Search Menu

Cecil of Wimbledon and Putney

Sponsored by William James Dalrymple West, Esq,. Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk

← Armorial Registry

England

Cecil of Wimbledon and Putney

Family / house
Cecil
Family / cadet branch
Cecil of Wimbledon and Putney, third-son branch of Exeter
Armiger / bearer
Edward Cecil, 1st Viscount Wimbledon
Entity type
cadet_branch
Social rank / class
peer
Heraldic authority
English armorial usage; Surrey county heraldic record
Record basis
recording
Issued / first recorded
1625
Until / superseded
1638-11-16
Historical period
Jacobean and Caroline
Grant / record reference
Created Baron Cecil of Putney and Viscount Wimbledon, 1625
Blazon
Barry of ten Argent and Azure, over all six escutcheons Sable, three, two and one, each charged with a lion rampant Argent. Crest: A garb Or supported by two lions, the dexter Argent and the sinister Azure. Motto: COR UNUM VIA UNA.
Plain-English description
Edward used the same hereditary Cecil shield as his father and elder brother, with the family crest of a golden sheaf supported by a silver lion and a blue lion. His title and residence created a distinct cadet identity centred on Wimbledon and Putney, although no shield difference is securely documented in the cited source.
Tinctures
Argent; Azure; Sable; Or
Charges / ordinaries
six escutcheons; six lions rampant; garb; two lions
Crest
A garb Or supported by two lions, the dexter Argent and the sinister Azure.
Motto
COR UNUM VIA UNA
Exterior ornaments
Viscount's coronet in full achievement; no securely evidenced inherited shield difference in the cited Surrey record.
Difference / variant
Distinct cadet-branch record for Edward as a titled younger son. The shield remains the Exeter Cecil design rather than a separately differenced coat in the cited evidence.
Source reference
Surrey Coats of Arms, A–H, Surrey County Council

Genealogical context

Father
Thomas Cecil, 1st Earl of Exeter
Mother
Dorothy Neville

Documented depiction

Open depiction source

Notes / sources

The cited county record supports the use of the undifferenced Cecil coat by Edward's titled branch. It should not be interpreted as proof that every later Cecil bearing the same shield belonged to this branch.