Deprecated: preg_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/u626884147/domains/manorialregistry.com/public_html/wp-includes/kses.php on line 2025
Search Menu

Watlington-West

Sponsored by William James Dalrymple West, Esq,. Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk

← Back to Manorial Registry

Manor & Lordship

Manor / site
Unknown
Associated lordship
Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk Associated
Lordship status
Active

Historical names: Trussbutts, Watlington-Colts, Watlington Hall

Location: Watlington, Norfolk

Location & Extent

GPS Location & Recorded Land Areas

Representative GPS point: 52.65174, 0.479792

Recorded boundary / extent: 7 coordinate points.

View boundary coordinates
  1. 52.653212, 0.47952
  2. 52.653131, 0.48336
  3. 52.651958, 0.483589
  4. 52.649972, 0.48392
  5. 52.649198, 0.48225
  6. 52.649991, 0.478747
  7. 52.651518, 0.478833

Separate recorded land areas

Batchelors Confirmed

Date / period: 1800

Documented

Polygon: 4 coordinate points.

  1. 52.652053, 0.47905
  2. 52.653212, 0.47952
  3. 52.653131, 0.48336
  4. 52.651958, 0.483589

Batchelors: just over 9 acres in 1633.
1843 name: Further Homestall.
Historic England correlates the northern field with Batchelors.

Capital Messuage / Colt's Close — Working

Documented

Polygon: 5 coordinate points.

  1. 52.651982, 0.482408
  2. 52.651081, 0.482505
  3. 52.651158, 0.478813
  4. 52.651518, 0.478833
  5. 52.652053, 0.47905

- "capitall messuage" and close called Colt's.
- 6 acres in 1633.

Alder Carr Working

Documented

Polygon: 4 coordinate points.

  1. 52.651151, 0.479182
  2. 52.65109, 0.482062
  3. 52.649653, 0.48198
  4. 52.649938, 0.479113

- nearly 7 acres.
- Historic England correlates low-lying western ground and adjoining plantation.

Appletons Working

Documented

Polygon: 5 coordinate points.

  1. 52.65109, 0.482062
  2. 52.651059, 0.483538
  3. 52.649972, 0.48392
  4. 52.649198, 0.48225
  5. 52.649653, 0.48198

- wooded close of 5 acres.
- Historic England correlates terraces and ground to south.

Four Tenements / Yards South of Colt's Provisional

Supported

Polygon: 4 coordinate points.

  1. 52.651158, 0.478813
  2. 52.651151, 0.479182
  3. 52.649938, 0.479113
  4. 52.649991, 0.478747

This is one provisional zone only. Do not divide into four invented property
polygons until the individual holdings can be identified.

Location / boundary notes:

Historic physical core of Watlington-Colts / Watlington-Trussbutts identified at Shouldham around Colt’s Hall / Colt’s Farm. A 1633 field book (NRO HARE 2495) describes the capital messuage and Colt’s Close (c.6 acres) south of Beerway and east of the street/market; Batchelors (>9 acres) north of Beerway, east of the street and west of the Abbey churchway; four tenements/yards east of the village green; Alder Carr (c.7 acres) further east; and Appletons (c.5 acres) east of Alder Carr. This represents the documented physical core, not necessarily the full historical manor extent. HARE 6832 (1811–1818 estate map) and the 1843 tithe map/apportionment are key sources for reconstructing the perimeter.

Representative point is Colts Hall, Eastgate Street, Shouldham, the documented physical centre/manor-house site of Colt's/Trussbutt's manor. Historic England NGR TF 67844 08887. The plotted extent is a reconstructed historical core rather than the complete legal manorial boundary. It encompasses the immediate Colt's/Trussbutt's complex described in the 1633 field book: the capital messuage and Colt's Close (c.6 acres), Batchelors (>9 acres), four tenements/yards, Alder Carr (c.7 acres) and Appletons (c.5 acres). Historic England identifies surviving earthworks north, east and south-east of Colts Hall with these parcels, and records the area as part of Colt's Farm on the 1811–1818 Hare estate map and as Homestall/Further Homestall in the 1843 tithe records. The wider historic Manor of Watlington Colts/Trussbutts extended beyond this core, including land in Watlington and Shouldham, so this polygon should be treated as the presently evidenced physical manorial nucleus, not a definitive perimeter of every historic manorial holding.

Date acquired: 2026

Method of acquisition: Transferred

About the Manor

The history of the manor is unusually rich, extending from the feudal landscape of medieval west Norfolk through the great Norfolk gentry families of the later Middle Ages and Tudor period, the dissolution of the monasteries, the consolidation of landed estates in the seventeenth century, and the survival of manorial courts into the nineteenth century.

Its history is also more complicated than its later name might suggest. Watlington-West, Watlington-Colts, Colt's, Watlington, Watlington Hall, or Trussbutt’s, Gawsells, the manor formerly belonging to Shouldham Priory, Shouldham Thorpe or Garboysthorpe, Foston Russells and a number of associated estates were not originally one single manor. They developed separately, passed through different families, and were at different periods united in common ownership.

This accumulation of estates explains the variety of names encountered in surviving documents. The same broad landed interest may appear in records under Colt’s, Trussbutt’s, Gawsells, Shouldham, Shouldham Thorpe, Garboysthorpe, Foston or Fodeston Russells, Tottenhill, Runcton Holme and Colts Farm, among others.

Medieval origins

The earliest history belongs to the feudal estates surrounding Shouldham Priory, whose tenants held lands by knight service.

Anglo-Saxon and Norman origins

The documented history of the estate begins before the Norman Conquest.

The earliest known holder was Ailid (Æthelgyth), a free woman of Anglo-Saxon England who held the estate before the redistribution of land which followed the Conquest. She had been deprived of the holding by the time of the Domesday Survey of 1086, when the estate was recorded in the hands of the Norman lord Ralph Baynard.

Ralph Baynard and the Domesday manor

Ralph Baynard, one of the substantial Norman landholders established in England after 1066, represents the first clearly identifiable post-Conquest lord in the surviving sequence.

His possession places the estate within the wider Baynard honour, part of the new Norman tenurial landscape imposed upon the older Anglo-Saxon pattern of landholding.

The estate subsequently descended to William Baynard.

William's involvement in rebellion against Henry I resulted in the forfeiture of his estates. That forfeiture marked a major change in the history of the property, removing it from Baynard possession and bringing it into the sphere of the powerful Clare family.

The Clare honour

The antiquarian descent records that the estate came “to the Earls of Clare.”

The wider Baynard forfeiture is known to have resulted in property passing to Robert fitz Richard, son of Richard fitz Gilbert de Clare, and he is therefore a strong candidate for the individual through whom this particular estate entered the Clare interest. 

Roger de Clare, Earl of Hertford, appears as the superior lord who confirmed the grant made by Geoffrey FitzPiers to Shouldham Priory, while Richard de Clare, Earl of Hertford, is recorded as the lord of whom Geoffrey FitzPiers held the relevant Watlington and Shouldham interests.

This is important because it reveals the feudal hierarchy behind the later manor.

The estate did not simply pass from one resident “lord of the manor” to another. At this stage different levels of interest existed simultaneously: the Clare earls as capital or superior lords, substantial tenants beneath them, and eventually the religious house at Shouldham holding its own endowed manorial and tenurial rights.

Geoffrey FitzPiers and the foundation of Shouldham Priory

The next major figure was Geoffrey FitzPiers, Earl of Essex, one of the most important royal administrators of his generation.

Geoffrey held the relevant interests under the honour of Clare and became closely connected with the establishment of Shouldham Priory. He endowed the priory with manorial, ecclesiastical and landed interests in the area.

This was a decisive moment in the development of the later estate.

Land which had previously formed part of a secular feudal holding was now brought into the endowment of a religious house. The Priory consequently became not merely a neighbouring institution but an important landlord and manorial authority in the Watlington–Shouldham landscape.

The Mandeville earls

The FitzPiers interest continued through Geoffrey's sons.

His son Geoffrey de Mandeville, Earl of Essex, succeeded to part of the inheritance and assumed the historic Mandeville name.

He was followed by his brother William de Mandeville, Earl of Essex, who confirmed his father's grant and conveyed further rights to Shouldham Priory, including remaining demesne, homages and services associated with the estate.

By the thirteenth century the Prior of Shouldham appears as a feudal lord receiving knight service from men holding lands within the estate. Those tenants were therefore entering a tenurial structure whose foundations had been laid generations earlier through the Clare, FitzPiers and Mandeville settlements.

Shouldham Priory as lord

Following the FitzPiers and Mandeville grants, Shouldham Priory became an institutional holder of substantial rights in both Shouldham and Watlington.

It is only at this point that the history reaches the early knight-service holders already described in the later section.

Among those holding lands of the Prior were:

  • Adam de Botefoy;
  • John, son of Adam;
  • Robert de Bokenham;
  • and members of the developing Trussbut interest.

These men should not all be treated as consecutive owners of one indivisible manor. They represent holders of interests within the broader feudal estate administered under the lordship of Shouldham Priory.

From here, the history begins to resolve into the line which eventually produced Trussbutt's Manor, and subsequently Colt's Manor, one of the principal components later absorbed into the wider Watlington estate, before its latter distributional splits, and leading to Watlington-West.

Ownership / Holder Account

Will Update

Objectives

Will Update

Manorial Rights & Privileges

Current manorial rights / privileges (35)

Assessment — Lordship / manorial title

Unverified

Right / Incident: Lordship / manorial title
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Modern chain accepted for project purposes; rights survival is a separate pre-1930 question.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: HMLR confirms lordship, manorial land and manorial rights can exist separately.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: User-supplied primary conveyance purports to convey Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts, so far as subsisting, with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances.
Current Combined Assessment: TITLE CHAIN / BENEFIT GATEWAY STRONG; no automatic proof of each individual right.
Connection to Colts: Core Colts title stream; keep Gawsels/Davis/Plestow/Coote identity questions record-specific.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Any contrary intention, reservation, severance or extinction before 12 Feb 1930; then modern priority/registration.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — 12 February 1930 conveyance gateway

Unverified

Right / Incident: 12 February 1930 conveyance gateway
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior rights project elevated this as the decisive modern rights bridge.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: LPA 1925 s.62(3) expressly treats compensation rights for extinguished manorial incidents as appertaining to a manor unless contrary intention appears.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Express wording: manor/lordship 'as far as the same respectively are subsisting' with 'rights royalties members and appurtenances'.
Current Combined Assessment: GENERAL RIGHTS PACKAGE EXPRESSLY INCLUDED AS A CLASS; the remaining problem is which specific rights were still legally subsisting.
Connection to Colts: Directly names Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts in the prior primary-instrument analysis.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Full deed clauses: exceptions/reservations, minerals, sporting/game, wastes, rents, fold, franchises, rights of entry, compensation, parcels and recitals.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — Manorial land / Colts Farm / capital messuage

Provisional

Right / Incident: Manorial land / Colts Farm / capital messuage
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Physical Colts estate strongly identifiable; later land can be severed from lordship/right package. PASS 51: HARE 2495/HE identifies the capital messuage/Colt's close (6a), four tenements/yards, alder carr (~7a), Appletons (5a) and Batchelors (>9a); early-19C Colt's Farm included the scheduled area and the 1843 tithe preserves Homestall/Further Homestall names.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: HARE 5466 keeps Colts Farm visible in Hare estate administration after the reported 1869 title-sale period. PASS 51 legal gate: s.62(3) can carry corporeal/reputed manor land still attached, while Comber/Delacherois confirms a prior distinct freehold conveyance severs it. HARE 5466 may therefore be either continuity of Colts land in Hare ownership or evidence it had already separated from the later lordship.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: If a candidate parcel was still legally/reputedly part/member of Watlington Colts and Humphreys had title, the 1930 manor conveyance could potentially carry it under the deed + s.62(3). If already severed, it could not.
Current Combined Assessment: PHYSICAL ESTATE EVIDENCE VERY STRONG; present ownership unresolved. Pass 51 opens a specific reputed-manor-land recovery route but proves no current parcel.
Connection to Colts: Strong historic Colts physical-estate connection.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Full HARE 2495; HARE 6832; 1843 tithe map/apportionment; HARE 5370 (1849 terrier); full HARE 5466 Colts Farm schedule; Hare physical-estate severance instruments including HARE 6374/6375 + HARE 6956; 16 Dec 1929 Green/Public Trustee -> Humphreys predecessor deed; 12 Feb 1930 manor deed ALREADY RECOVERED/ANALYSED (do not re-search); HMLR index/title history for each reconstructed parcel; NHER 4283 protection agreement.
Priority: Very High

Assessment — Free fold / fold liberties

Provisional

Right / Incident: Free fold / fold liberties
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Historically the strongest distinctive Colts/Trussbutts right: 1506 free fold; 1597 Colts/Trusbutts title material with fold liberty.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Later enclosure and land reorganisation make survival doubtful; Pass 39 keeps 1506 identity caution visible.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Would pass only if still subsisting and attached/reputedly attached in 1930.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC RIGHT STRONG; MODERN SURVIVAL UNPROVED / LOOKS WEAK.
Connection to Colts: Strongest historic Colts-specific rights candidate, but 1506 identity bridge still matters.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: 1749 Watlington inclosure award/map, later court/custumal evidence, 19th/20th-century severance files.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — 16 shillings rent

Unverified

Right / Incident: 16 shillings rent
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Historic 1506 rent proved; legal character unresolved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Ordinary quit/customary rents fall on the 1922 extinguishment/compensation side; a legally distinct rentcharge would need separate proof.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Only a still-subsisting legally transferable rent/compensation entitlement could pass.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC RENT PROVED; PRESENT CLAIM DOWNGRADED UNLESS LATER CHARACTER/CONTINUITY IS FOUND.
Connection to Colts: 1506 Watlyngton bundle; Colts identity not automatically assumed.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Later rentals, compensation agreements, 1749 award, proof of independent rentcharge character.
Priority: High

Assessment — Court baron / customary court

Unverified

Right / Incident: Court baron / customary court
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Long Watlington court/custom sequence identified; individual manor stream must be proved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Gawsels yearly courts leet/baron directly evidenced in 1845 and 1883; ordinary copyhold incidents were transformed by the reforms.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: A court-related right could pass only to extent still legally subsisting; extinct jurisdiction is not revived by general words.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC COURT FUNCTION PROVED; NOT A SAFE PRESENT EXERCISABLE RIGHT WITHOUT SPECIFIC SURVIVAL PROOF.
Connection to Colts: Some Watlington/Gawsels court evidence; generic Watlington records remain stream-sensitive.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Identify last courts/copyholders, statutory effect, compensation schedules and exact manor creator of each court record.
Priority: High

Assessment — Heriots / fines / reliefs / fealty / suit / admissions

Unverified

Right / Incident: Heriots / fines / reliefs / fealty / suit / admissions
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier ledger already classified these as ordinary copyhold/manorial incidents rather than serious present-right targets.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 39 proves arbitrary fines at Gawsels in 1845; Pass 38 maps the 1922 compensation machinery.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Any outstanding compensation entitlement could pass; the extinct incident itself does not revive.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC INCIDENTS; EXPECT EXTINGUISHMENT/COMPENSATION, NOT PRESENT EXERCISE.
Connection to Colts: Gawsels arbitrary fines proved; Colts-specific 1926 status unknown.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: MAF 13/27, manor-specific tenant schedules/agreements, last court/rental records.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — Mines / minerals / quarry / working rights

Unverified

Right / Incident: Mines / minerals / quarry / working rights
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Highest-value legally preservable category; no direct Colts mineral reservation previously found.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: HMLR PG65 confirms mineral ownership/working rights can remain severed from surface and can also be expressly extinguished.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Would fall within 1930 general rights wording only if still owned/appurtenant/reputedly enjoyed with the manor and not excluded.
Current Combined Assessment: LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL; NO DIRECT COLTS RESERVATION YET PROVED.
Connection to Colts: Unproved for Colts; wider estate/enclosure sources may allocate minerals separately.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: 1749 award/map, 1794/98 Shouldham award, 1943 lease, c.1900 exchanges, modern mineral registrations/notices.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — Sporting / hunting / shooting / fowling

Provisional

Right / Incident: Sporting / hunting / shooting / fowling
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier rights project found the strongest post-1926 factual survivor in the wider estate: Hare Estate sporting reservation.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Forestry plan states 1943 999-year lease from Hare Estate and sporting rights retained/exercised in Shouldham Sincks; 2022 Norfolk County Council independently states Forestry leased Shouldham Warren from the landowner.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: If a Colts sporting right was still attached to the manor in 1930, the deed wording could carry it; however the 1943 reservation is evidenced in the separate Hare/Stow landowner stream and is not identified as a Colts right.
Current Combined Assessment: POST-1926 SPORTING RIGHT VERIFIED IN WIDER HARE/STOW ESTATE; COLTS APPURTENANCE UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Shouldham/Hare Estate connection real; specific Colts title connection not proved.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Actual 1943 lease; current registered freehold/reversion; HARE 6962-86; c.1900 exchanges; map parcels against Colts Farm.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — Warren / chase

Provisional

Right / Incident: Warren / chase
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: 1634 Shouldham Warren lease is a genuine rights-bearing historical target; Colts ownership not proved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: 1922 regime preserves chase/warren as capable classes; later Hare sporting-right evidence increases importance.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Could pass in 1930 only if the relevant franchise/right belonged to Colts and still subsisted.
Current Combined Assessment: LEGALLY SURVIVABLE CATEGORY; REAL SHOULDHAM WARREN HISTORY; COLTS DEVOLUTION UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Shouldham/Hare stream, not yet Colts.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Recover 1634 lease: lessor, land, franchise wording, successors/assigns, game reservation, later lease chain.
Priority: Very High

Assessment — Piscary / fishing

Unverified

Right / Incident: Piscary / fishing
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier ledger downgraded Domesday fishery as wider Baynard/Shouldham evidence; no continuous Colts piscary proved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: HMLR PG16 confirms a piscary/profit can exist separately from ownership of lake/riverbed.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: 1930 wording could carry a subsisting piscary, but cannot create or restore one.
Current Combined Assessment: LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL; NO DIRECT CONTINUOUS COLTS FISHERY PROOF.
Connection to Colts: Wider Shouldham evidence only at present.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Later deeds/court customs, enclosure award, specific lake/water parcels, fishery grant/reservation, modern title protection.
Priority: High

Assessment — Market / fair / toll / stallage

Provisional

Right / Incident: Market / fair / toll / stallage
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Shouldham prescriptive market and later fairs are real; franchise ownership stream unresolved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Market/fair franchises are among preserved categories; 1633 'market place' is not ownership proof.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Could pass only if the franchise belonged to Colts and was still subsisting in 1930.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC FRANCHISE STREAM EXISTS; COLTS OWNERSHIP / MODERN SURVIVAL UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Could be Colts, Priory manor or another Shouldham component.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Franchise grants/custom, court/rental receipts, Hare consolidation deeds, later market/fair records.
Priority: High

Assessment — Commons / wastes / common-related rights

Unverified

Right / Incident: Commons / wastes / common-related rights
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier ledger treats these as heavily transformed by enclosure.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: 1749 Watlington inclosure and 1794–98 Shouldham enclosure are separate decisive transformation regimes.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Only residual waste/common rights surviving those awards could reach 1930.
Current Combined Assessment: SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON ENCLOSURE AWARDS / ALLOTMENTS / RESERVATIONS.
Connection to Colts: Territory-based tracing required; do not merge by manor label alone.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Full 1749 Watlington Act/award/map/claims; 1794–98 Shouldham award/map; later exchanges.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — Roads / ways / dykes / drains / protective works

Provisional

Right / Incident: Roads / ways / dykes / drains / protective works
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Certain obligations/rights are legally preservable; actual Colts basis unproved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: LPA 1922 Schedule 12 preserves certain works liabilities; enclosure likely reorganised roads/drains.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Only a specific subsisting right/liability would pass in 1930.
Current Combined Assessment: LEGAL CAPACITY EXISTS; FACTUAL COLTS RIGHT/LIABILITY UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Territory/parcel dependent.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: 1749/1798 awards, commissioners' papers, later drainage/highway instruments.
Priority: Medium-High

Assessment — Timber

Unverified

Right / Incident: Timber
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier ledger treated timber separately from minerals/sporting rights.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 38 identifies timber-related incidents within extinguishment/compensation framework; physical timber ownership can also follow land.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: 1930 passage depends on whether it was a surviving appurtenant right versus land ownership or an extinguished incident.
Current Combined Assessment: NO SIMPLE PRESENT MANORIAL TIMBER RIGHT PROVED.
Connection to Colts: Parcel/right character must be established.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Enfranchisement/compensation agreements, estate deeds, 1749/1798 awards, 1943 lease.
Priority: High

Assessment — Advowson / St Peter patronage

Unverified

Right / Incident: Advowson / St Peter patronage
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Historic 1506 advowson strong, but later patronage stream was separately owned and modern church law governs transfer.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 40 separation principles reinforce that a historical appurtenance may have been severed long before modern title transfer.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: 1930 general words do not restore a severed ecclesiastical patronage right.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC ADVOWSON PROVED; SEPARATE PATRONAGE STREAM; NOT A CURRENT MANOR-SALE RIGHT.
Connection to Colts: 1506 working Watlyngton bundle; later Colts identity/devolution unresolved.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Diocesan patronage register and historic presentation deeds.
Priority: Medium

Assessment — Castleward / waytefee / superior honour franchises

Unverified

Right / Incident: Castleward / waytefee / superior honour franchises
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Historic Watlington/Wormegay burdens and superior franchises proved in medieval records, but not Colts present rights.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Tenures Abolition Act 1660 / superior-honour structure remain controlling transformation context.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Not rescued by 1930 general words if already abolished, superior-only, or never Colts rights.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORICAL CONTEXT / BURDENS ONLY; NO PRESENT COLTS CLAIM.
Connection to Colts: Wormegay/Watlington predecessor or superior honour, not proved as Colts beneficial right.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Original fee/custom rolls, delegation/exercise evidence, chain-specific proof.
Priority: Low

Assessment — Mill / salthouse / early Baynard resources

Unverified

Right / Incident: Mill / salthouse / early Baynard resources
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier audit downgraded these as wider Baynard/Shouldham resource evidence, not Colts.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Current separation rules confirm physical/economic resources do not become modern manorial rights merely from early estate association.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Could not pass as Colts rights in 1930 without an intervening Colts-specific chain.
Current Combined Assessment: WIDER SHOULDHAM/BAYNARD LEADS ONLY; DO NOT PRESENT AS COLTS RIGHTS.
Connection to Colts: No direct Colts bridge.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Bridge estate/resource into Trussbutts/Colts through deeds/rentals/courts.
Priority: Low

Assessment — 1597 Colt -> Shouldham title anchor (HARE 2402)

Unverified

Right / Incident: 1597 Colt -> Shouldham title anchor (HARE 2402)
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior rights project established actual bargain and sale expressly naming Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Current main ledger now carries the exact NRO reference and scope.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Shows the named Colts/Trusbutts manor identity in an operative assurance well before the 1930 gateway.
Current Combined Assessment: DIRECT HISTORIC TITLE IDENTITY STRONG.
Connection to Colts: Direct Colts/Trusbutts wording.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Original HARE 2402 scan/full transcription, including reservations and appurtenances.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — 1597 fold liberty (HARE 2403)

Provisional

Right / Incident: 1597 fold liberty (HARE 2403)
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior rights project materially upgraded fold history beyond the 1506 generic Watlyngton free fold.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Current main ledger now carries the NRO title-exemplification record.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: A fold liberty can reach the 1930 general words only if it survived the 1749 inclosure and later estate changes.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC FOLD LIBERTY NOW TIED TO 1597 WATLYNGTON/COLTES TITLE PACKAGE; SURVIVAL STILL UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Strong Colts-title connection; exact allocation across several places requires original.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: HARE 2403 original + full 1749 award/map + later parcel/severance records.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — 1749 Watlington inclosure award extract (MS 7245, 7B4)

Unverified

Right / Incident: 1749 Watlington inclosure award extract (MS 7245, 7B4)
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier project located an exact surviving award fragment rather than merely the Act title.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 42 confirms the Act's statutory existence and restores the NRO extract into the main ledger.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: The inclosure is the principal transformation gate for fold, commons/waste, roads/drains and possible mineral reservations before 1930.
Current Combined Assessment: AWARD FRAGMENT EXISTS; FULL RIGHTS EFFECT STILL UNREAD.
Connection to Colts: Watlington parish/manor; precise manor stream of Elizabeth Roberts allotment unknown.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Order MS 7245, 7B4 and trace its parent award/map/claims/commissioners' papers.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — 16 Dec 1929 predecessor conveyance

Unverified

Right / Incident: 16 Dec 1929 predecessor conveyance
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier private deed analysis exposed this recited root immediately before Humphreys -> Edleston.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 42 restores it to the current title chain.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: It may contain the immediate pre-1930 reservations/severances defining what Humphreys could convey.
Current Combined Assessment: CRITICAL MISSING PREDECESSOR INSTRUMENT.
Connection to Colts: Directly recited in 12 Feb 1930 deed affecting the conveyed hereditaments.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Obtain full Green + Public Trustee -> Humphreys deed and schedule.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — 21 Dec 1977 two-deed vesting sequence

Documented

Right / Incident: 21 Dec 1977 two-deed vesting sequence
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior project had primary deed proof; current ledger had only chronology/secondary material.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 42 restores both deeds separately.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: First deed expressly schedules Watlington Colts/Trusbutts into Eric's executor capacity; second sweeps residual Sarah-estate lordships to Richard.
Current Combined Assessment: MODERN BENEFIT-SIDE CHAIN SUBSTANTIALLY PRIMARY-PROVED TO RICHARD.
Connection to Colts: Watlington Colts expressly named in first deed; second is residual sweep.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Inspect 30 Oct 1969 assent; then Richard's will/Olivia assent/current transfer.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — Shouldham Woods freehold/reversion vs Forestry lease

Provisional

Right / Incident: Shouldham Woods freehold/reversion vs Forestry lease
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier project had the 1943 sporting-right reservation but did not fully state the tenure consequence.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Forestry England currently says Shouldham is leasehold; its plan says the 999-year Hare Estate lease began in 1943; Norfolk County Council independently says Forestry leased Warren from the landowner. Only West Bilney is Forestry freehold.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: This proves a separate superior-landowner/leaseholder structure. [Inference] The superior/reversionary estate remains outside Forestry unless later transferred, but the exact legal proprietor must come from the lease/HMLR. No evidence ties that superior estate to the Watlington-Colts lordship.
Current Combined Assessment: LEASEHOLD STRUCTURE STRONGLY PROVED; CURRENT REGISTERED FREEHOLDER AND COLTS CONNECTION UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Hare/Stow estate, not automatically Watlington Colts.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Actual 1943 lease; current freehold/reversion and leasehold registers/title plans; HARE 6962-86/new Hare archive; compare parcels against Colts Farm.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — Shouldham Sincks ownership

Provisional

Right / Incident: Shouldham Sincks ownership
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier project knew Sincks as a sporting-right exercise area.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Shouldham Parish Council in 2021 expressly says Shouldham Sincks is owned by Stow Estates; Forestry's plan treats Sincks as part of the 372ha lease and says estate sporting rights are exercised there.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Any 1930 Colts right over Sincks would therefore need an independent chain as a burden/profit over land in the Stow estate stream; title ownership alone is insufficient.
Current Combined Assessment: PUBLIC OWNER STATEMENT EXISTS FOR SINCKS; REGISTERED PROPRIETOR/ENTITY AND COLTS CONNECTION UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Stow estate land stream.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: HMLR freehold register/title plan; actual 1943 lease; identify Stow Estates legal entity; historic parcel mapping.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — Shouldham minerals / silica sand

Provisional

Right / Incident: Shouldham minerals / silica sand
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Minerals were already identified as the highest-value legally preservable category, but no Colts reservation was found.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: BGS confirms extractable Leziate sands at Shouldham Warren/Sincks and historic working; Norfolk planning identifies the area as mineral-search territory.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Physical mineral existence makes the title question commercially/materially real, but the 1930 general words only carry minerals if they were then attached and not severed/reserved.
Current Combined Assessment: RESOURCE EXISTS PHYSICALLY; OWNERSHIP OF MINERAL ESTATE REMAINS UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Location overlaps wider Shouldham/Hare-Stow estate environment; Colts parcel connection still requires mapping.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: 1749/1798 awards; HARE 6374/6375/6956; 1943 lease mineral reservations; current mineral title/notices and operator agreements.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — Late-19th-century Stow ownership of Shouldham Woods

Unverified

Right / Incident: Late-19th-century Stow ownership of Shouldham Woods
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier rights work showed modern Hare/Stow sporting-right survival but the pre-1943 land ownership anchor was less explicit.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Forestry England now directly states that by the late 19th century the Stow Bardolph Estate owned Shouldham Woods.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Confirms the woodland freehold/estate stream existed independently before the 1930 Colts title conveyance.
Current Combined Assessment: PHYSICAL SHOULDHAM WOODLAND OWNERSHIP IN STOW/HARE STREAM STRONGLY PROVED BEFORE 1930.
Connection to Colts: Wider estate; no deed currently reconnects it to Colts.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Tithe/OS/HARE estate deeds and c.1900 exchange papers.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — c.1900 Hare ↔ Hoff exchange

Unverified

Right / Incident: c.1900 Hare ↔ Hoff exchange
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Legacy project already flagged HARE 6374/6375 as a possible severance point.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 44 promotes the exact HARE 6956/1-5 marked OS sheets into the main ledger.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Could identify precisely which Shouldham/Thorpe parcels left the Hare estate before Humphreys/Edleston acquired the title package.
Current Combined Assessment: CONCRETE PRE-1930 PARCEL-SEVERANCE EVENT; DETAILS UNREAD.
Connection to Colts: Potential Colts Farm/Shouldham relevance requires map matching.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: HARE 6374-5 + HARE 6956/1-5 originals.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — 2010 Stow Estate physical/sporting continuity

Unverified

Right / Incident: 2010 Stow Estate physical/sporting continuity
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior legacy analysis noted a modern shooting-estate stream.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Official council report records Hare family's Stow Estate as traditional farming and shooting estate, c.4,000 acres in 2010.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Strongly supports persistence of separate estate land and sporting interests long after the 1930 title conveyance.
Current Combined Assessment: MODERN WIDER-ESTATE LAND/SPORTING STREAM STRONG.
Connection to Colts: No Colts appurtenance proved.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Land Registry titles; estate trust/title documents; actual 1943 lease.
Priority: Very High

Assessment — Land severance does not itself decide rights

Unverified

Right / Incident: Land severance does not itself decide rights
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier project separated lordship, land and individual rights but some summaries risked implying retained rights automatically follow severance.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 45 adds a local 1845 control: Hare could be chief owner/lord in Shouldham Thorpe while Fodderston freehold belonged to Ely and was only leased to him with tithes.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: For each land sale/exchange/lease, the deed determines whether sporting/mineral/piscary/warren/timber rights were retained or transferred.
Current Combined Assessment: NO AUTOMATIC PRESUMPTION THAT RIGHTS REMAINED WITH THE LORD WHEN LAND WAS SEVERED.
Connection to Colts: Applies directly to interpreting Hare/Hoff c.1900 and Hare→Forestry 1943.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: HARE 6374/6375/6956; actual 1943 lease; registered titles; reservations/exceptions.
Priority: Critical

Assessment — 1845 Hare rabbit-warren landholding

Provisional

Right / Incident: 1845 Hare rabbit-warren landholding
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Warren history was previously a real Shouldham lead but specific Colts franchise continuity remained unproved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: White 1845 says Hare's 2,674 acres included a rabbit warren and names William Brighton as warrener.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Shows estate ownership/management of warren land; does not by itself prove a separately retained free-warren franchise.
Current Combined Assessment: HARE ESTATE WARREN LAND / MANAGEMENT STRONG; COLTS INCORPOREAL WARREN RIGHT STILL UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Shouldham/Hare estate.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: 1634 warren lease; 1798 enclosure; later shooting leases; 1943 lease reservations.
Priority: Very High

Assessment — 1779-1780 Shouldham gamekeeping enforcement

Provisional

Right / Incident: 1779-1780 Shouldham gamekeeping enforcement
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior work proved warren management and later sporting-right reservation but had less direct evidence of actual eighteenth-century game enforcement.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Joseph Forby is reported as appointed gamekeeper of Sir Thomas Hare's manor at Shouldham; ensuing legal case concerns seizure of guns on the property.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Strengthens historic sporting/game control in the wider Shouldham manor/estate stream but still does not establish Colts-specific appurtenance.
Current Combined Assessment: ACTIVE HISTORIC GAME CONTROL STRONGLY INDICATED; COLTS IDENTITY UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Hare/Shouldham.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Underlying Wentworth pleading; gamekeeper appointment/estate records; manor-specific court or shooting leases.
Priority: Very High

Assessment — Extraction and resource rights are beneficiary-specific

Unverified

Right / Incident: Extraction and resource rights are beneficiary-specific
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier minerals/common analysis already separated legal categories.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 46 added nine acres of digging ground and a fuel allotment where poor cut peat. Pass 47 fixes the fuel-allotment origin: Charity Commission identifies the 1794 Inclosure Award (P.R. 29.(1) p.520), while White 1845 gives a separate 95-acre Shouldham allotment and a 60-acre Shouldham Thorpe allotment.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Shows that extractive/resource entitlements were beneficiary- and parcel-specific; the poor-allotment stream cannot be converted into a lord's mineral right, and Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe allotments must remain separate.
Current Combined Assessment: FUEL-ALLOTMENT ORIGIN PROVED (1794); RESOURCE USE PROVED; LORD'S PROPRIETARY RIGHT NOT IMPLIED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Shouldham/Hare landscape.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Full 1794 Shouldham award P.R. 29.(1) p.520; full Shouldham Thorpe award; parcel maps; later charity schemes/title.
Priority: High

Assessment — 1943 Forestry Commission operational anchor

Documented

Right / Incident: 1943 Forestry Commission operational anchor
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier official Forest Plan evidence stated that Shouldham Woods management began in 1943 under a 999-year lease from the Hare Estate.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 47 adds a contemporary Forestry Commission administrative source: the Twenty-Fourth Annual Report lists '140. Shouldham, Norfolk' among Commission units for the year ending 30 September 1943.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Independently corroborates the 1943 transition into Forestry Commission administration without supplying the lease's proprietary/reservation clauses.
Current Combined Assessment: PRIMARY ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENCE PROVED BY SEP 1943; ACTUAL LEASE TERMS STILL UNREAD.
Connection to Colts: Wider Hare/Stow Shouldham Woods land stream; Colts appurtenance still unproved.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Actual 1943 lease; Forestry estate/acquisition file; registered freehold/leasehold titles; later variations.
Priority: Very High

Assessment — Forestry unit acreage is not title/lease acreage

Unverified

Right / Incident: Forestry unit acreage is not title/lease acreage
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Pass 49 identified a 1,290-acre Shouldham Forestry unit in 1959 and a modern 372ha Shouldham leasehold plan, leaving an apparent size discrepancy.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 50 adds the missing chronology: 1953 Shouldham was 956 acres; 1954 it rose to 1,290; 1960 the Commission expressly amalgamated Gaywood and Shouldham as Lynn Forest; later reports still call the site 'Lynn Forest, Shouldham'.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Administrative/operational forest acreage can change through acquisition, regrouping, disposal or re-survey without proving a corresponding change in the original 1943 legal demise.
Current Combined Assessment: CORRECTION: DO NOT USE 1,290 ACRES VS 372HA AS DIRECT PROOF THAT THE SHOULDHAM LEASE WAS PARTLY SURRENDERED OR SEVERED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Forestry/Hare-Stow land stream; no Colts appurtenance proved.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: F37 Lynn/Shouldham/Gaywood working plans; 1953-54 estate/acquisition files; 1943 lease and later variations; HMLR titles.
Priority: Critical

Historic manorial rights / privileges (31)

16 shillings rent

Unverified

Historic evidence/status: Direct 1506 rent remains proved. Earlier generic Watlyngton rent/court records may expose its origin or structure, but their contents and exact Colts identity are unread.

Subsequent treatment: LPA 1922 s.140 remains relevant if the 16s was a quit/chief/free rent or other manorial incident. PASS 8 downgrades HARE 2454 from a preferred Colts source and adds HARE 4058 plus F(M) roll 160 as earlier identity-controlled tests. PASS 10: same 1506 predecessor-title problem as the free fold; Pynkeney/Elizabeth -> Wyatt/Pegge must be bridged to the Trussbutts/Colts stream. PASS 12: PCC PROB 11/19/108 transcription records a separate 'Rent in Watlyngton called Parlettes' given in 1518 to Thomas Karvyle the younger. This strengthens the need to distinguish the 1506 16s rent from Kervile and other Watlington rent streams. PASS 13: if a valid rent still appertained to the manor on 12 Feb 1930, LPA 1925 s.62(3) is potentially relevant; however earlier statutory extinguishment, redemption, merger or severance must first be excluded. PASS 26 comparison: Holybreads is a concrete later land-charged Davis parcel linking Watlington and Tottenhill. It does not prove continuity of the 1506 16s rent, but demonstrates how named parcel rent streams can persist independently of manor labels.

Current stance: No present enforceable Colts rent is proved.

One free fold

Unverified

Historic evidence/status: Historic fold/fold-liberty case materially strengthened: 1506 direct Watlyngton free fold plus 1597 bundled-title fold liberty. Exact exclusivity to Colts still requires original deed allocation.

Subsequent treatment: 1749 enclosure is still the likely transformation point; 1926 copyhold abolition followed. PASS 8 adds HARE 4056 (uncertain 14th-century custumal), F(M) roll 160 and BL/MA 34 as custom/court tests, but none is internally identified as Colts. PASS 10: the 1506 fine expressly says the manor/free fold/advowson were acknowledged by Robert Pynkeney and Elizabeth as property Henry Wyatt, Richard Wyatt and Reynold Pegge had of their gift, with quitclaim from themselves and Elizabeth's heirs. PASS 11: HARE 2826 adds a 1440-41 Shouldham field-system source, but no fold/foldage wording from the original has been recovered. PASS 13: HARE 2402 expressly anchors Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes in the 1597 operative title; HARE 2403 follows with fold-liberty wording. Modern survival remains blocked by 1749 enclosure, pre-1926 estate dealings and the absence of the 1930 conveyance wording. PASS 15: 1930 deed expressly conveys then-subsisting rights/royalties/members/appurtenances with Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts. PASS 26: Fitton Inclosure Act 1807 and the 1808 Statement of Claims (58 claims) provide a new statutory source for Wiggenhall parcels within the extended historical Colts geography.

Current stance: The historic right is proved; survival of the same right is not. No substitute Colts allotment or modern property right has been identified.

Advowson of St Peter / Watlington patronage

Unverified

Historic evidence/status: Directly appurtenant in 1506; later patronage separately identifiable

Subsequent treatment: Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 s.32 severed any advowson then appendant to manor/land; s.3 bars sale for value PASS 9: White 1845 places the Watlington rectory in C.B. Plestow's gift while naming him lord of Gawsells; the 1870-72 Imperial Gazetteer names G. Barker as patron; White 1883 names Coote lord of Gawsells but Gilbert Barker patron. Thus patronage was separately owned from the named Gawsells lordship by this period. PASS 10: the 1506 fine's 'of their gift' wording and quitclaim from Elizabeth's heirs makes the Pynkeney/Elizabeth predecessor title a necessary identity test before the 1506 advowson is treated as continuous Colts evidence. PASS 13: Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 s.3 provides that a right of patronage cannot be sold and a transfer for valuable consideration is void.

Current stance: It is not a current incident passing on a sale of the Colts lordship.

Lordship / manorial title

Unverified

right_or_incident: Lordship / manorial title
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Historic title chain; HMLR PG22 framework
historic_status: Historic lordship capable of separate existence. PASS 8 separation correction: contemporary directories positively identify Plestow (1845) and Coote (1883) as lords of Gawsells in Watlington; they do not independently prove a Colts title chain.
key_change_or_survival_event: LRA 2002 framework remains relevant. PASS 8: the official MDR exposes a generic Watlington Manor record-creator series, but its undifferentiated metadata cannot merge Colts with the Davis/Plestow/Tottenhill stream. Plestow/Coote Colts ownership still requires an express conveyance or contemporaneous inventory. PASS 9: official Essex Archives D/P 214/25/11 corrects the later Colt generation: George Colt of Cavendish was son/heir of Henry Colt, son/heir of the elder Sir George Colt; the 2025 narrative's seller generation is therefore compressed/mistaken. PASS 10: the 2025 catalogue's alleged Domesday Watlington-Colts bundle is source-conflated; Open Domesday shows the £2 Baynard holding at Shouldham Thorpe and the mill/fishery/church package in a different Baynard Shouldham entry. PASS 12: 1403 Laurence Trussebute is recorded on both the main multi-place Watlington fee and a separate Watlington quarter-fee; by 1427 Thomas Trusbut holds the main fee while Robert Kervyle holds the quarter-fee. Generic Trussbut+Watlington evidence must therefore be stream-tested. PASS 13: supplied legal chronology places Humphreys -> Robert Holmes Edleston conveyance on 12 Feb 1930. LPA 1925 s.62(3) potentially carries then-existing appurtenant/reputed appurtenant manor rights unless contrary intention expressed. Subsequent supplied chain runs through estate administration and 1977 assents, Richard John Hanby Holmes, 2017 probate, Olivia Mary Holmes and the current Watlington-West endpoint. PASS 14: TNA HMC 5/6-8 identified as official 1920s government-derived lists of manors and title owners, a new pre-1930 corroboration target. HMLR current search route clarified: SIF searches registered manors/relating franchises; SIM does not. PASS 15: private 1930 deed and 1977 assents replace earlier public-search gaps. 1930 deed expressly conveys the named manors as far as subsisting with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances.
current_legal_category: Incorporeal hereditament; separate from land/rights
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Modern lordship chain is treated as sufficient for present-benefit transmission. PASS 16 removes the current executed transfer as a rights-survival bottleneck: the question is which Colts/Trussbutts rights were still subsisting by 1930.
connection_to_colts: Core Colts title stream; Gawsells/Davis/Plestow/Coote stream must remain separate unless expressly joined
present_claim_assessment: CURRENT LORDSHIP CHAIN ACCEPTED FOR PROJECT PURPOSES; RIGHTS ANALYSIS NOW ENTIRELY PRE-1930 SURVIVAL
next_decisive_document: 1749 Watlington award; 1798 Shouldham award; Colts-specific court/copyhold/enfranchisement records; c.1900 severance files
notes: Do not convert the generic NRO Watlington Manor authority record or the Gawsells directory entries into a Colts conveyance. Absence of the word Colts in a directory is not proof that the same person owned no second manor. Search the operative Colt assurance under George Colt/Colte/Coult of Cavendish, esquire, son/heir of Henry Colt; do not assume 'Sir George Colt, son of George'. PASS 10 requires the early Baynard/Shouldham estate to be bridged into the later Trussbutts/Colts stream before its Domesday resources are attributed to the manor. PASS 12: this dual-fee structure is a core identity-control rule for the whole rights reconstruction.

Manorial land / Colts Farm / capital messuage

Documented

right_or_incident: Manorial land / Colts Farm / capital messuage
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: HARE 2495; HARE 5466 and other estate evidence
historic_status: Physical estate historically identifiable
key_change_or_survival_event: Land may be severed from lordship. PASS 8: White's 1845 directory says Plestow owned most parish land and Watlington Hall while separately calling him lord of Gawsells. Estate ownership therefore does not itself prove ownership of Colts or its incorporeal rights. PASS 10: Historic England's HARE 2495 summary remains strong evidence that Colt's/Trussbutt's was a separately identifiable physical estate in 1633 with tenements, alder carr, Appletons and tenant occupation. PASS 11: NRO HARE 2826 is now identified as a Shouldham field book/draft survey of 1440-41 with diagrammatic field-strip maps at fols 16v and 34v. The producing manor is not yet identified. PASS 13: physical manorial land is legally distinct from the lordship and from incorporeal manorial rights. c.1900 HARE 6956/HARE 6374-5 exchanges are a key pre-1926 severance gate. PASS 14: physical land/parcel side must be searched through SIM/index-map and current/historic registers, separately from SIF manor/franchise search.
current_legal_category: Corporeal land, not automatically a manorial right
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Late physical Colts identity is now exceptionally useful for exclusion as well as inclusion: White 1845 separately lists a Colts Hall farmer, Abbey Farm farmer and warrener; HARE 5466 post-1874 separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm. Full HARE 5466 is now the key source for allocating minerals, sporting, timber and other estate rights to the correct unit.
connection_to_colts: Historic Colts estate connection strong; later Hall/Gawsells ownership is not automatic Colts proof
present_claim_assessment: LATE COLTS PHYSICAL ESTATE STRONGLY IDENTIFIABLE AND OPERATIONALLY SEPARATE FROM ABBEY/WARREN UNITS; USE AS PRIMARY PARCEL-ALLOCATION CONTROL
next_decisive_document: Complete HARE 5466 schedule/tenancy package; full Shouldham award/map; HARE 6832; tithe apportionment; HARE 6374/6375 and HARE 6956 exchange plans
notes: A person can own parish land, a hall and one named manor without that evidence proving title to every other local manor. Inspect all of HARE 2826, not merely mapped fols 16v/34v: scholarship says the maps cover only a tiny part of the written draft survey.

16 shillings rent

Provisional

right_or_incident: 16 shillings rent
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1506 CP 25/1/170/197 no.106; HARE 4058 (1411-1412) and F(M) roll 160 (1452-1453) are newly identified earlier rent/court tests, not yet matched to the 1506 rent
historic_status: Direct 1506 rent remains proved. Earlier generic Watlyngton rent/court records may expose its origin or structure, but their contents and exact Colts identity are unread.
key_change_or_survival_event: LPA 1922 s.140 remains relevant if the 16s was a quit/chief/free rent or other manorial incident. PASS 8 downgrades HARE 2454 from a preferred Colts source and adds HARE 4058 plus F(M) roll 160 as earlier identity-controlled tests. PASS 10: same 1506 predecessor-title problem as the free fold; Pynkeney/Elizabeth -> Wyatt/Pegge must be bridged to the Trussbutts/Colts stream. PASS 12: PCC PROB 11/19/108 transcription records a separate 'Rent in Watlyngton called Parlettes' given in 1518 to Thomas Karvyle the younger. This strengthens the need to distinguish the 1506 16s rent from Kervile and other Watlington rent streams. PASS 13: if a valid rent still appertained to the manor on 12 Feb 1930, LPA 1925 s.62(3) is potentially relevant; however earlier statutory extinguishment, redemption, merger or severance must first be excluded. PASS 66: direct Kervile probate-derived evidence now shows a separate early-Tudor Watlington estate carrying rents and services; Thomas Kervile elder's 1522/1535 will also bundles rents/reversions/suits/services with his capital messuage. This reinforces the need to keep Kervile rents, including Parlettes, separate from the Wyatt 1506 16s rent unless an instrument bridges them.
current_legal_category: Exact type unresolved
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic 1506 rent is direct for that Watlyngton transaction but its Colts identity and legal character remain uncertain. If it was a manorial quit/customary rent, the 1922 extinguishment/compensation regime is adverse to survival; no evidence currently shows an independent rentcharge surviving to 1930.
connection_to_colts: Direct in working 1506 manor bundle
present_claim_assessment: WEAK CURRENT CANDIDATE — LEGAL CHARACTER AND LATER CONTINUATION UNPROVED; ORDINARY MANORIAL RENT WOULD NOT SURVIVE AS CURRENT PRIVILEGE
next_decisive_document: Pre-1506 Pynkeney/Elizabeth title; HARE 2826 if it proves the relevant manor; HARE 4058 1411-12 rent account; Henry Wyatt 1537 IPM/will; later rentals/conveyances
notes: Do not call the rent extinguished until its type and chain are established; do not treat any generic Watlington rent account as Colts without internal identification. PASS 11: HARE 2826 may provide earlier survey/rent context, but no rent text has been read from the original. Do not equate Parlettes with the 1506 rent without an instrument or parcel/title bridge. PASS 66: the Kervile wills strengthen the competing-rent control but do not identify Parlettes with the capital messuage or with Wyatt's 16s rent.

One free fold

Unverified

right_or_incident: One free fold
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1506 CP25/1/170/197 no.106 records one free fold in Watlyngton; PASS 13 adds HARE 2403 (20 Oct 1597), a title exemplification for a package expressly including Watlyngton/Watlyngton Coltes and a liberty of a fold in Watlyngton and other places.
historic_status: Historic fold/fold-liberty case materially strengthened: 1506 direct Watlyngton free fold plus 1597 bundled-title fold liberty. Exact exclusivity to Colts still requires original deed allocation.
key_change_or_survival_event: 1749 enclosure is still the likely transformation point; 1926 copyhold abolition followed. PASS 8 adds HARE 4056 (uncertain 14th-century custumal), F(M) roll 160 and BL/MA 34 as custom/court tests, but none is internally identified as Colts. PASS 10: the 1506 fine expressly says the manor/free fold/advowson were acknowledged by Robert Pynkeney and Elizabeth as property Henry Wyatt, Richard Wyatt and Reynold Pegge had of their gift, with quitclaim from themselves and Elizabeth's heirs. PASS 11: HARE 2826 adds a 1440-41 Shouldham field-system source, but no fold/foldage wording from the original has been recovered. PASS 13: HARE 2402 expressly anchors Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes in the 1597 operative title; HARE 2403 follows with fold-liberty wording. Modern survival remains blocked by 1749 enclosure, pre-1926 estate dealings and the absence of the 1930 conveyance wording. PASS 15: 1930 deed expressly conveys then-subsisting rights/royalties/members/appurtenances with Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts. PASS 66: Thomas Kervile elder's will dated 31 Jan 1522 (proved 1535) directly gives the liberties of a foldcourse-and-a-half in Watlington with his capital-messuage estate. This proves that fold/foldcourse language occurred in a competing Kervile stream and cannot by itself identify the 1506 free fold as Colts/Trussbutts.
current_legal_category: Historic fold/foldcourse custom or proprietary interest; not one of the narrow Schedule-12 manorial-right categories expressly listed by HMLR PG66. Any modern survival requires proof of a separate proprietary/easement/profit/land route.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic Colts fold/fold-liberty remains one of the strongest specifically associated rights. PASS 19 adds no evidence of same-right survival and reinforces the need to distinguish Colts claims from Abbey Common/other parish rights in the enclosure award.
connection_to_colts: Direct in working 1506 manor bundle
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC COLTS FOLD RIGHT STRONG; NO PASS 18 EVIDENCE RESCUES SAME-RIGHT SURVIVAL — ENCLOSURE SUBSTITUTE REMAINS THE ONLY SERIOUS MODERN ROUTE
next_decisive_document: Full 1749 Watlington award/map; full 1798 Shouldham/Thorpe award/map; HARE 2403 original; parcel matching
notes: The custumal is the right document type to explain fold obligations, but its title is uncertain and top illegible. BL/MA 34 must be treated as a Gawsells/Tottenhill comparator unless Colts is expressly named. Do not infer a fold from field-strip mapping alone. PASS 66: Kervile foldcourse evidence does not extinguish or disprove the separate 1506 Wyatt free fold or the 1597 Colts fold liberty; it makes title-stream allocation more important.

Advowson of St Peter / Watlington patronage

Unverified

right_or_incident: Advowson of St Peter / Watlington patronage
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1506 CP 25/1/170/197 no.106
historic_status: Directly appurtenant in 1506; later patronage separately identifiable
key_change_or_survival_event: Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 s.32 severed any advowson then appendant to manor/land; s.3 bars sale for value PASS 9: White 1845 places the Watlington rectory in C.B. Plestow's gift while naming him lord of Gawsells; the 1870-72 Imperial Gazetteer names G. Barker as patron; White 1883 names Coote lord of Gawsells but Gilbert Barker patron. Thus patronage was separately owned from the named Gawsells lordship by this period. PASS 10: the 1506 fine's 'of their gift' wording and quitclaim from Elizabeth's heirs makes the Pynkeney/Elizabeth predecessor title a necessary identity test before the 1506 advowson is treated as continuous Colts evidence. PASS 13: Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 s.3 provides that a right of patronage cannot be sold and a transfer for valuable consideration is void.
current_legal_category: Separate ecclesiastical patronage right governed by church-law registration/transfer regime; not a saleable modern manorial appurtenance.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Private 1930 conveyance broadly transferred then-subsisting rights/appurtenances, but nineteenth-century evidence already shows Watlington patronage separately owned from the named manor stream, and current patronage is governed by separate ecclesiastical law. No present advowson passes merely with Watlington-West.
connection_to_colts: Direct in 1506 working Watlyngton bundle; later identity/devolution unproved. PASS 9 demonstrates that nineteenth-century Watlington patronage did not automatically accompany the named Gawsells lordship.
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC ADVOWSON PROVED; SEPARATE PATRONAGE STREAM; NOT A CURRENT MANOR-SALE RIGHT
next_decisive_document: Diocesan patronage register/current registered patron; historic Plestow->Barker transfer; intermediate presentation deeds
notes: Strongest resolved modern legal effect. The c.1930 inventory is catalogue-only and unread. PASS 9 narrows a nineteenth-century severance/transfer window: Plestow patron in 1845; Barker patron by 1870-72; Coote lord of Gawsells while Barker patron in 1883. PASS 11 found no new Pynkeney/Elizabeth or Henry Wyatt document bridging the 1506 advowson into the Colts stream. PASS 12: superior Wormegay held generic advowsons in 1441, but this does not bridge the specific 1506 St Peter advowson into Colts.

Court baron / customary court

Provisional

right_or_incident: Court baron / customary court
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Official MDR Watlington series: HARE 4056 custumal (14th c.); HARE 4058 rent account (1411-1412); F(M) roll 160 court roll (1452-1453); HARE 2454 court book (1554-1558); BL/MA 34 draft court book (1746-1767)
historic_status: A five-record Watlington court/custom/rent sequence is now identified across two archives. Every item remains identity-unresolved for Colts because the MDR uses an undifferentiated Watlington Manor creator name.
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 8 correction: HARE 2454 is no longer the strongest Colts candidate by chronology alone. F(M) roll 160 is the highest transition-era inspection priority, while BL/MA 34 is an enclosure-era comparator in a Davis/Tottenhill context likely associated with Gawsells. PASS 11: exact NRO refs WAL 1058, 285x2 (Dersingham Shouldham court rolls 1495-1509) and PD 603/197 (Dersingham Shouldham rental 1499/1500) are recorded as a separate comparator stream, not Colts. PASS 12: historic Public Records inventory expressly lists 'Watlington, manor. Roll of court baron and customary court, anno 14 Hen. VI' (1435-36). The current shelfmark and specific lord/manor stream are not yet identified.
current_legal_category: Historic jurisdiction/evidentiary institution; copyhold abolition ended the last meaningful land-tenure function of manorial courts.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: An actual Watlington court baron/customary court roll of 1435-36 is verified in the historic inventory, but it cannot yet be assigned to Colts/Trussbutts. If the original heading identifies the Trussbut manor, it could become direct evidence of its customs and incidents.
connection_to_colts: RECORD SET STRONG; PARTICULAR-MANOR IDENTITY UNPROVED
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC COURT/CUSTOM EVIDENCE TARGET; NOT A PRESENT EXERCISABLE FEUDAL JURISDICTION
next_decisive_document: Recover modern shelfmark and full 1435-36 Watlington court roll; identify lord/steward/manor and extract all customs, admissions, fines, rents, heriots, fold/common and court incidents
notes: HMLR requires custom of the particular manor. Generic creator metadata cannot merge multiple Watlington streams. PASS 10 rejected a tempting 1381-1930 court-roll series on the sale catalogue because page-boundary checking showed it belongs to Wivenhoe, not Watlington Colts. Do not import customs from 'Dersingham Shouldham' merely because the record title contains Shouldham.

Heriots / customary fines / reliefs / fealty / suit / copyhold admissions

Unverified

right_or_incident: Heriots / customary fines / reliefs / fealty / suit / copyhold admissions
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Potential evidence in HARE 4056, F(M) roll 160, HARE 2454 and BL/MA 34; no incident yet transcribed or identified as Colts
historic_status: Exact local incidents are now testable across a dated Watlington record set, but none may be assumed merely because such incidents were typical of manorial courts.
key_change_or_survival_event: LPA 1922 compulsory enfranchisement and s.140 extinguishment regime remains decisive for incidents that existed. PASS 8 adds earlier and enclosure-era evidence targets while increasing the particular-manor identity caution. PASS 13 current-period focus: ordinary copyhold/manorial incidents fall on the extinguishment/compensation side of the 1922-1926 reforms; any surviving compensation claim would need its own documentary chain.
current_legal_category: Extinguished/compensated manorial incidents if they existed
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Not treated as present privileges; historic Colts incidence remains unproved until an internally identified Colts record is read.
connection_to_colts: Generic Watlington evidentiary targets; exact Colts identity awaits inspection
present_claim_assessment: EXTINGUISHED / HISTORIC ONLY — NOT A CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST PRIVILEGE
next_decisive_document: F(M) roll 160; HARE 4056; HARE 2454; BL/MA 34; MAF 13/27
notes: BL/MA 34 may demonstrate Gawsells/Davis/Plestow court practice and must not be imported into Colts without an express joining instrument. PASS 11: WAL 1058 / PD 603/197 are preserved only as a separate Dersingham Shouldham comparator; no incident from them is attributed to Colts.

Mines / minerals

Unverified

right_or_incident: Mines / minerals
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet
historic_status: Possible historic manorial category
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserved category; PG65 says survival depends on manor custom/enfranchisement and later dealings PASS 13: expressly within the narrow manorial-right categories preserved through enfranchisement and recognised by HMLR PG66. If still appurtenant in 1930, LPA 1925 s.62(3) could potentially carry the benefit unless excluded; 2013 priority must then be checked parcel-by-parcel. PASS 14: official Norfolk planning material confirms significant silica-sand geology in the wider Shouldham/Marham/Tottenhill/Stow landscape, increasing practical value of the mineral-title question without proving ownership. PASS 17: nearby Tottenhill enclosure evidence shows local awards could expressly provide sand/gravel pits, while modern Watlington/Shouldham planning confirms substantial mineral resources. These are methodological/value evidence only, not Colts title. PASS 18: official local history records a nine-acre Shouldham digging ground feeding a lime kiln; BGS records an old sand pit at Shouldham Warren. These prove extraction/resource presence but not Colts ownership.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Legally capable of survival and real Shouldham extraction/resource evidence exists. PASS 19 cautions that the strongest identified pit/Warren/Abbey evidence is geographically and operationally outside the known Colts Hall core, while HARE 5466 separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm. No Colts-specific mineral title/reservation has been recovered.
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: HIGH-VALUE SURVIVABLE CLASS; LOCAL EXTRACTION PROVED BUT CURRENT EVIDENCE DOES NOT ATTRIBUTE IT TO COLTS — PARCEL/ENFRANCHISEMENT PROOF REQUIRED
next_decisive_document: HARE 5466 full Colts Farm schedules; Shouldham/Watlington enclosure awards; Colts copyhold/enfranchisement papers; MAF 9/13/27; c.1900 exchange deeds
notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.

Limestone / lime / clay / stone / gravel

Unverified

right_or_incident: Limestone / lime / clay / stone / gravel
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet
historic_status: Possible manorial category
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserved PASS 13: expressly within the narrow manorial-right categories preserved through enfranchisement and recognised by HMLR PG66. If still appurtenant in 1930, LPA 1925 s.62(3) could potentially carry the benefit unless excluded; 2013 priority must then be checked parcel-by-parcel. PASS 14: official Norfolk planning material confirms significant silica-sand geology in the wider Shouldham/Marham/Tottenhill/Stow landscape, increasing practical value of the mineral-title question without proving ownership. PASS 17: nearby Tottenhill enclosure evidence shows local awards could expressly provide sand/gravel pits, while modern Watlington/Shouldham planning confirms substantial mineral resources. These are methodological/value evidence only, not Colts title.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Legally capable of survival and real Shouldham extraction/resource evidence exists. PASS 19 cautions that the strongest identified pit/Warren/Abbey evidence is geographically and operationally outside the known Colts Hall core, while HARE 5466 separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm. No Colts-specific mineral title/reservation has been recovered.
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: HIGH-VALUE SURVIVABLE CLASS; LOCAL EXTRACTION PROVED BUT CURRENT EVIDENCE DOES NOT ATTRIBUTE IT TO COLTS — PARCEL/ENFRANCHISEMENT PROOF REQUIRED
next_decisive_document: HARE 5466 full Colts Farm schedules; Shouldham/Watlington enclosure awards; Colts copyhold/enfranchisement papers; MAF 9/13/27; c.1900 exchange deeds
notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.

Pits / quarries

Unverified

right_or_incident: Pits / quarries
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet
historic_status: Possible manorial category
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserved PASS 13: expressly within the narrow manorial-right categories preserved through enfranchisement and recognised by HMLR PG66. If still appurtenant in 1930, LPA 1925 s.62(3) could potentially carry the benefit unless excluded; 2013 priority must then be checked parcel-by-parcel. PASS 14: official Norfolk planning material confirms significant silica-sand geology in the wider Shouldham/Marham/Tottenhill/Stow landscape, increasing practical value of the mineral-title question without proving ownership. PASS 17: nearby Tottenhill enclosure evidence shows local awards could expressly provide sand/gravel pits, while modern Watlington/Shouldham planning confirms substantial mineral resources. These are methodological/value evidence only, not Colts title. PASS 18: official local history records a nine-acre Shouldham digging ground feeding a lime kiln; BGS records an old sand pit at Shouldham Warren. These prove extraction/resource presence but not Colts ownership.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Legally capable of survival and real Shouldham extraction/resource evidence exists. PASS 19 cautions that the strongest identified pit/Warren/Abbey evidence is geographically and operationally outside the known Colts Hall core, while HARE 5466 separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm. No Colts-specific mineral title/reservation has been recovered.
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: HIGH-VALUE SURVIVABLE CLASS; LOCAL EXTRACTION PROVED BUT CURRENT EVIDENCE DOES NOT ATTRIBUTE IT TO COLTS — PARCEL/ENFRANCHISEMENT PROOF REQUIRED
next_decisive_document: HARE 5466 full Colts Farm schedules; Shouldham/Watlington enclosure awards; Colts copyhold/enfranchisement papers; MAF 9/13/27; c.1900 exchange deeds
notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.

Mineral entry / search / working rights

Unverified

right_or_incident: Mineral entry / search / working rights
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet
historic_status: Possible ancillary rights
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserved ancillary powers/easements PASS 13: expressly within the narrow manorial-right categories preserved through enfranchisement and recognised by HMLR PG66. If still appurtenant in 1930, LPA 1925 s.62(3) could potentially carry the benefit unless excluded; 2013 priority must then be checked parcel-by-parcel. PASS 14: official Norfolk planning material confirms significant silica-sand geology in the wider Shouldham/Marham/Tottenhill/Stow landscape, increasing practical value of the mineral-title question without proving ownership. PASS 17: nearby Tottenhill enclosure evidence shows local awards could expressly provide sand/gravel pits, while modern Watlington/Shouldham planning confirms substantial mineral resources. These are methodological/value evidence only, not Colts title. PASS 18: official local history records a nine-acre Shouldham digging ground feeding a lime kiln; BGS records an old sand pit at Shouldham Warren. These prove extraction/resource presence but not Colts ownership.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival if underlying mineral right/custom survives
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Legally capable of survival and real Shouldham extraction/resource evidence exists. PASS 19 cautions that the strongest identified pit/Warren/Abbey evidence is geographically and operationally outside the known Colts Hall core, while HARE 5466 separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm. No Colts-specific mineral title/reservation has been recovered.
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: HIGH-VALUE SURVIVABLE CLASS; LOCAL EXTRACTION PROVED BUT CURRENT EVIDENCE DOES NOT ATTRIBUTE IT TO COLTS — PARCEL/ENFRANCHISEMENT PROOF REQUIRED
next_decisive_document: HARE 5466 full Colts Farm schedules; Shouldham/Watlington enclosure awards; Colts copyhold/enfranchisement papers; MAF 9/13/27; c.1900 exchange deeds
notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.

Sporting / hunting / shooting / fowling

Provisional

right_or_incident: Sporting / hunting / shooting / fowling
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Official Forestry England plan: 1943 Hare Estate 999-year lease context, sporting rights retained and exercised in Shouldham Sincks
historic_status: Post-1926 substantive estate sporting right positively evidenced
key_change_or_survival_event: 1943 reservation/exercise evidenced in the wider Hare Estate context. PASS 7: HARE 6374/1-4 and 6375/1-72 now identify the 1899-1905 Hare/Hoff exchange as a possible reservation/severance point, but no sporting clause or Colts parcel has been read. PASS 9: current Forestry England webpage continues to classify Shouldham as leasehold land, consistent with the historic long-lease framework, but does not identify current sporting-right ownership. PASS 11: Forestry plan states retained estate sporting rights were exercised in the Sincks; Shouldham Parish Council states Shouldham Sincks was owned by Stow Estates in 2021. PASS 13: this category is expressly capable of surviving within the modern Schedule-12/HMLR framework. Any valid Colts right still existing in 1930 could potentially pass under LPA 1925 s.62(3) unless excluded, but 2013 priority and present ownership must be proved. PASS 14: 2010 official local-authority report describes the Hare family's Stow Estate as a traditional Norfolk farming and shooting estate of about 4,000 acres at that time; Stow Estate Trust is a currently identifiable estate entity. PASS 15: supplied 1930 and 1977 deeds materially strengthen the modern benefit-side transmission of any such right that was still subsisting with Watlington Colts at 1930.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Modern Hare/Stow sporting-right survival remains real, but PASS 19 further separates the underlying estate streams. The physical Warren has a serious Priory/other-estate competing origin and cannot be treated as Colts sporting evidence without parcel/title linkage.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — modern wider-estate stream; Warren origin now has serious Priory/other-Hare competing hypothesis
present_claim_assessment: SURVIVING SPORTING STREAM PROVED OUTSIDE THE SPECIFIC COLTS TITLE; COLTS BENEFIT NOT YET PROVED
next_decisive_document: HARE 5466 complete Colts Farm schedule; c.1900 Hare exchange deeds; 1943 Forestry lease/plan; pre-1632/17th-century estate rentals distinguishing Colts from Abbey/Warren
notes: The exchange catalogue and MDR records are evidentiary routes, not proof of a sporting reservation or Colts title connection. Current leasehold classification is structural corroboration only; it is not proof that the 1943 sporting reservation is unchanged or appurtenant to Colts. Do not equate Stow Estates' landownership with sporting-right ownership.

Warren / chase

Documented

right_or_incident: Warren / chase
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: PASS 12 upgrade: calendar-derived 19 July 1254 royal charter grants William Bardolf and heirs free warren in demesne lands expressly including Watlington; 1441 Phelipp IPM also records warrens in the superior Wormegay franchise bundle.
historic_status: Free warren is historically verified in Watlington at the superior Bardolf/Wormegay level; no Trussbut/Colts subgrant or descent is yet proved.
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserves chase/warren PASS 13: this category is expressly capable of surviving within the modern Schedule-12/HMLR framework. Any valid Colts right still existing in 1930 could potentially pass under LPA 1925 s.62(3) unless excluded, but 2013 priority and present ownership must be proved. PASS 15: supplied 1930 and 1977 deeds materially strengthen the modern benefit-side transmission of any such right that was still subsisting with Watlington Colts at 1930.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Shouldham Warren survival into the Hare/modern sporting estate is strongly evidenced. PASS 19 materially weakens attribution to Colts: VCH records that Shouldham Priory possessed a Henry III free-warren franchise somewhere in its institutional estate; a 1425 IPM separately records the prior's Shouldham/Wereham/Stoke Ferry fee; 1845 separately lists a warrener, Abbey Farm farmer and Colts Hall farmer; HARE 5466 later separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm; and the Warren lies materially north of the known Colts Hall core. Exact Priory-warren locality and later Warren title remain unresolved.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED AND NOW MATERIALLY DOUBTFUL AS AN INFERENCE — Priory/other Hare-estate origin is a serious competing hypothesis
present_claim_assessment: SHOULDHAM WARREN SURVIVAL STRONGLY PROVED; WATLINGTON-COLTS OWNERSHIP NOT PROVED; PRIORY/OTHER-ESTATE ORIGIN MUST BE EXCLUDED
next_decisive_document: Hundred Rolls I pp458/519/532/538; Quo Warranto p489; Henry III warren charter; pre-1632 Warren records; 1634 lease; HARE 5466 full schedules; Shouldham award/map
notes: Do not confuse a land-name warren with a franchise. Use only internally identified Colts/Watlyngton entries; generic creator metadata is insufficient. PASS 11 did not recover the underlying 1634 Shouldham Warren lease reference or text. PASS 14: modern Stow shooting-estate evidence strengthens continuity of a wider sporting/warren landscape but is not a Colts title bridge.

Piscary / fishing

Unverified

right_or_incident: Piscary / fishing
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: PASS 10 correction: fishery is directly recorded in Ralph Baynard's separate Shouldham Domesday entry; the 2025 catalogue's attribution of it to a £2 'Watlington Colts' manor is not supported as one Domesday entry.
historic_status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham fishery resource proved; historic Watlington-Colts piscary not proved
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserves piscaries/fishing PASS 10 downgrades the auction narrative: the £2 Baynard Shouldham Thorpe entry has no fishery, while the Baynard Shouldham entry with the fishery is valued £15 6s. PASS 13: this category is expressly capable of surviving within the modern Schedule-12/HMLR framework. Any valid Colts right still existing in 1930 could potentially pass under LPA 1925 s.62(3) unless excluded, but 2013 priority and present ownership must be proved. PASS 15: supplied 1930 and 1977 deeds materially strengthen the modern benefit-side transmission of any such right that was still subsisting with Watlington Colts at 1930.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: No direct Colts piscary/fishing right or chain of devolution is proved. The Domesday fishery is a wider Shouldham/Baynard lead only until descent/recombination into Colts is demonstrated.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — wider Baynard/Shouldham evidence only
present_claim_assessment: LEGALLY SURVIVABLE CLASS, BUT CURRENT HISTORIC EVIDENCE IS BAYNARD/SHOULDHAM RATHER THAN COLTS
next_decisive_document: HMLR SIF/SIM as appropriate if a specific franchise/profit is identified; historic Colts bridge; 1930/current transfer; burdened-parcel register
notes: Do not cite the 2025 catalogue's combined £2 + fishery wording as direct Colts evidence.

Watlington market franchise

Provisional

right_or_incident: Watlington market franchise
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Gazetteer: prescriptive market noted 1252
historic_status: Historic Watlington market evidenced
key_change_or_survival_event: PG18: franchise separate from land; prescription/devolution/exercise evidence required PASS 13: fairs/markets are expressly listed by HMLR PG66 as a potentially surviving manorial-right category; title, exercise/devolution and 2013 protection remain unproved for Colts. PASS 15: if a Colts market/fair franchise was still subsisting/appurtenant in 1930, the private conveyance's rights/royalties/appurtenances wording materially strengthens transmission into the Edleston chain.
current_legal_category: Potential relating franchise
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Market/fair events are historically real and survived locally, but PASS 19 spatial evidence places Fair Stead northwest of Shouldham while the known Colts core is east of the village. Geography is not title, but no documentary or spatial evidence currently attributes the franchise to Colts.
connection_to_colts: Ownership by Colts not proved
present_claim_assessment: SURVIVABLE FRANCHISE CLASS / LOCAL EVENT CONTINUITY, BUT COLTS TITLE REMAINS ENTIRELY UNPROVED AND PRIORITY IS LOWER
next_decisive_document: Original source behind Dymond; F(M) roll 160 and HARE 2454 for evidence of exercise; title/devolution; franchise index
notes: Not a proved 1252 charter grant. A generic Watlington court reference could show local exercise but would not itself prove ownership by Colts or present survival.

Shouldham market / fairs

Provisional

right_or_incident: Shouldham market / fairs
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Prescriptive market by 1334 + later fairs
historic_status: Historic separate Shouldham stream
key_change_or_survival_event: Market/fair franchises can survive separately if title proven PASS 13: fairs/markets are expressly listed by HMLR PG66 as a potentially surviving manorial-right category; title, exercise/devolution and 2013 protection remain unproved for Colts. PASS 15: if a Colts market/fair franchise was still subsisting/appurtenant in 1930, the private conveyance's rights/royalties/appurtenances wording materially strengthens transmission into the Edleston chain.
current_legal_category: Potential franchise
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Market/fair events are historically real and survived locally, but PASS 19 spatial evidence places Fair Stead northwest of Shouldham while the known Colts core is east of the village. Geography is not title, but no documentary or spatial evidence currently attributes the franchise to Colts.
connection_to_colts: Not assigned to Colts
present_claim_assessment: SURVIVABLE FRANCHISE CLASS / LOCAL EVENT CONTINUITY, BUT COLTS TITLE REMAINS ENTIRELY UNPROVED AND PRIORITY IS LOWER
next_decisive_document: Original franchise/devolution records

Tolls / stallage

Unverified

right_or_incident: Tolls / stallage
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: HARE 2719 abstract, 1587, Shouldham Priory manor
historic_status: Historic separate manor rights lead
key_change_or_survival_event: HARE 2719 Shouldham Priory stream. PASS 6: 1611/1628 deeds demonstrate neighbouring manors continued to be separately named/legal packages.
current_legal_category: Separate stream
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic wider-estate/Priory toll and stallage evidence exists, but no current Colts franchise/title is proved. Any modern toll claim would require a surviving franchise/title, not common ownership alone.
connection_to_colts: Shouldham Priory stream
present_claim_assessment: EXCLUDE FROM COLTS UNTIL AN EXPRESS RECOMBINATION/RIGHT TRANSFER IS PROVED
next_decisive_document: HARE 2719 original plus any later deed expressly transferring/combining franchise rights with Colts
notes: Common Gawdy/Rich/Hare ownership is insufficient to merge rights.

Two fold liberties

Unverified

right_or_incident: Two fold liberties
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: HARE 2719 abstract, 1587
historic_status: Historic separate Shouldham Priory-manor rights
key_change_or_survival_event: HARE 2719 separate Shouldham Priory stream; PASS 6 1611/1628 deed evidence strengthens separate-manor treatment.
current_legal_category: Separate stream
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Not current Colts proof
connection_to_colts: Shouldham Priory stream
present_claim_assessment: EXCLUDE FROM COLTS UNTIL EXPRESS TITLE/RIGHT RECOMBINATION IS PROVED
next_decisive_document: HARE 2719 original and later consolidation/assurance deeds
notes: Remain distinct from the ONE FREE FOLD expressly conveyed with Watlyngton in 1506.

Commons / wastes / common rights

Unverified

right_or_incident: Commons / wastes / common rights
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1749 Watlington Inclosure Act; surviving award extract NRO MS 7245, 7B4 (Elizabeth Roberts allotment)
historic_status: Historic commons/waste definitively subject to enclosure legislation
key_change_or_survival_event: 1749 enclosure likely replaced/extinguished common rights with allotments/rules. PASS 8 adds BL/MA 34, whose Watlington section spans 1746-1767, as a before/after comparator; its Davis/Tottenhill context means it cannot be assigned to Colts without express identity evidence. PASS 11: 1798 Shouldham enclosure schedule provenance upgraded; it expressly covers allotments, roads, footpaths, drain, fences and rules. HARE 2826 also provides a 1440-41 field-system source, but neither is yet tied parcel-by-parcel to Colts. PASS 13: distinguish physical ownership of residual manorial waste from incorporeal common/manorial rights. LPA 1925 s.62(3) is relevant to a 1930 manor conveyance, but the 1749 award and later parcel deeds can have severed/transformed these interests.
current_legal_category: Post-enclosure land/right outcome depends on award
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Enclosure transformation of parish common rights remains strongly evidenced. PASS 19 adds a specifically named 'Abbey Common' in the 1796 Shouldham road notice, reinforcing that parish-level common landscapes must be allocated to the correct manor/estate before any Colts claim is made.
connection_to_colts: Watlington enclosure direct; particular manor/tenure outcome unresolved; BL/MA 34 likely Gawsells comparator
present_claim_assessment: OLD COMMON RIGHTS TRANSFORMED/EXTINGUISHED LOCALLY; COLTS SUBSTITUTE ALLOTMENT NOT FOUND; ABBEY-ASSOCIATED COMMON LANDSCAPE IS A COMPETING STREAM
next_decisive_document: Full Shouldham/Thorpe award and map using Charity Commission clue P.R. 29.(1) p.520; full 1749 Watlington award/map; parcel-match Colts
notes: Do not say the full award has been found and do not transfer an enclosure-era Gawsells court outcome to Colts without the operative award or an express consolidation.

Roads / ways / dykes / drains / protective works

Unverified

right_or_incident: Roads / ways / dykes / drains / protective works
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Enclosure regimes + Schedule 12 legal category
historic_status: Potential historic rights/liabilities
key_change_or_survival_event: Certain liabilities are capable of statutory preservation. PASS 8 adds a medieval custumal, transition court roll and enclosure-era draft court book as targets; no road, drainage or protective-work clause has been read. PASS 11: Heidelberg catalogue confirms the 1798 Shouldham schedule expressly covers public/private/bridle roads, footpaths, drain, fences, rules/orders; a local transcription also preserves 1796 commissioners' road-setting notices. PASS 13: certain liabilities for construction/maintenance/repair of dykes, ditches, canals and other works are within the modern HMLR-preserved manorial-right framework. Any Colts liability/right requires award/deed and parcel identification plus current priority analysis.
current_legal_category: Legally capable in certain forms
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic enclosure routes/drainage obligations are evidenced at parish/estate level. No individual Colts right or burden is yet identified without award/map and parcel matching.
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: LIMITED WORKS-LIABILITY CATEGORY CAN SURVIVE; NO COLTS-SPECIFIC CUSTOM OR OBLIGATION YET PROVED
next_decisive_document: Full 1749 Watlington award/map; full 1798 Shouldham award/map/schedule; parcel genealogy through HARE 2495/HARE 6832/tithe and modern titles
notes: Fenland geography and record type justify investigation but are not evidence of a right, liability or Colts ownership.

Timber

Provisional

right_or_incident: Timber
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1798 Shouldham timber licence is separate; no direct Colts timber reservation
historic_status: Historic estate category possible
key_change_or_survival_event: Old timber incidents subject to enfranchisement/compensation; ordinary ownership rules otherwise PASS 11: bibliographic record for the 1798 Shouldham enclosure schedule states that the surviving copy contains a manuscript 'License to fell timber' signed Thomas Hare between pp.8-9.
current_legal_category: No automatic manorial title right
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Estate-level timber control/licensing is evidenced in the surviving 1798 Shouldham enclosure copy, but no proprietary or manorial timber right specific to Colts is proved.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — common Hare ownership/estate context alone is insufficient
present_claim_assessment: ESTATE-LEVEL TIMBER DOCUMENT EXISTS; COLTS MANORIAL TIMBER RIGHT UNPROVED
next_decisive_document: Inspect manuscript timber licence and full 1798 schedule/award/map; identify parcels/manor; later Hare conveyances/reservations
notes: PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence.

Village green control

Unverified

right_or_incident: Village green control
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: No direct evidence
historic_status: Not inherent from lordship alone
key_change_or_survival_event: Commons/village green law separate
current_legal_category: Not automatic manorial right
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: No proof
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: NO PRESENT RIGHT PROVED
next_decisive_document: Commons register / land title

Modern access / wayleaves in Shouldham woodland estate

Unverified

right_or_incident: Modern access / wayleaves in Shouldham woodland estate
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Forestry England Shouldham/Bilney Forest Plan; 2021 Shouldham Sincks access notice
historic_status: Modern estate/leasehold access and wayleave context, not established as medieval/manorial rights
key_change_or_survival_event: Forest plan refers to access to private houses and utility wayleaves; 2021 access control involved Stow Estates PASS 9: Forestry England's current page expressly classifies Shouldham as leasehold land with permissive access granted by the landowner. PASS 11: 2021 Parish Council identifies Stow Estates as Sincks landowner and says access remains required for Stow Estates/residents; Forestry plan separately records private-house access and utility wayleaves.
current_legal_category: Ordinary easement/licence/wayleave/land-management rights unless contrary title evidence proves a manorial origin
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Modern access/wayleave arrangements exist in the wider Shouldham woodland estate. No evidence ties them to the historical Colts lordship.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED
present_claim_assessment: DO NOT PRESENT AS A MANORIAL RIGHT OF COLTS
next_decisive_document: 1943 lease and all later variations/assignments; current land title; permissive-access/wayleave instruments; any deed expressly linking these to Colts
notes: Included to prevent modern estate access arrangements being accidentally described as surviving manorial privileges.

Mill / milling interest

Unverified

right_or_incident: Mill / milling interest
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Ralph Baynard's Shouldham [All Saints and St Margaret]/other Shouldham Domesday entry: 0.8 mills
historic_status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham economic resource proved; no direct Watlington-Colts mill right proved
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 10 source audit shows the 2025 catalogue combines the £2 Shouldham Thorpe valuation with resources from a different Baynard Shouldham entry.
current_legal_category: A mill may be ordinary land/property or carry associated easements/profits; Domesday presence alone does not create a present manorial franchise.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: No mill, milling monopoly, multure or other milling right is proved in the Colts chain.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — wider Baynard/Shouldham evidence only
present_claim_assessment: DO NOT PRESENT AS A WATLINGTON-COLTS RIGHT
next_decisive_document: Instrument bridging the relevant Baynard Shouldham estate/resource into Trussbutts/Colts; later court/custom/rental evidence
notes: The 2025 catalogue's Domesday wording is insufficient. Distinguish physical mill property from any customary milling incident. PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence.

Salthouse / salt-working profit

Unverified

right_or_incident: Salthouse / salt-working profit
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Ralph Baynard's Shouldham Domesday entry records 1 salthouse
historic_status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham economic resource proved; not mentioned in the 2025 Watlington-Colts catalogue paragraph
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 10 exposes the salthouse while auditing the Baynard Shouldham resource package, but no descent into Colts is proved.
current_legal_category: Historic land/economic resource; no automatic surviving manorial privilege follows from Domesday description
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: No salt-working, salthouse or related profit is proved for Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — wider Baynard/Shouldham evidence only
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC SHOULDHAM LEAD ONLY; NO COLTS RIGHT PROVED
next_decisive_document: Evidence proving descent/recombination of the relevant Shouldham estate into Trussbutts/Colts; later rentals/deeds
notes: Recorded to preserve a potentially relevant historic profit without silently importing it into the Colts rights bundle. PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence.

Castleward / castle-guard rent

Provisional

right_or_incident: Castleward / castle-guard rent
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1329 Thomas Bardolf IPM/calendar material: Wormegay foreign tenants paid 2s 2d per full knight's fee at the end of every 24 weeks, called Castelwarde; multiple Watlington fee holdings expressly rendered it.
historic_status: VERIFIED historic feudal burden on specified Watlington/Wormegay knight's-fee holdings; exact later Trussbut/Colts predecessor not identified.
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 12 first separately tracks this burden. The 1329 schedule names Watlington/Longham manor and other Watlington-linked fee holdings paying Castelward. PASS 65 source-controls the split: Geoffrey Bryseyard holds the Watlington-and-Longham manor for one fee, while a separate tenant group holds another one-fee Watlington/Foston/Wallington/Setchey/Hardwick block. Later 1610-11 Longham Priors/Holkham evidence creates a competing Longham-Watlington-Priors stream; therefore the 1329 Bryseyard manor is no longer treated as the likely Trusbut antecedent without an explicit descent bridge.
current_legal_category: Historic charge tied to medieval knight-service tenure; Tenures Abolition Act 1660 is the relevant abolition/conversion framework.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic Wormegay/Watlington burden only; no present Watlington-West liability established.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — Wormegay/Watlington predecessor context only
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC WATLINGTON BURDEN VERIFIED; COLTS LINK UNPROVED; NO CURRENT LIABILITY ESTABLISHED
next_decisive_document: Edward I eleven-membrane Wormegay fee/custom roll; original 1329 IPM membrane; 1390/1403/1427 fee comparison; Trussbut deeds/custumals
notes: Do not turn a superior feudal burden into a present manorial privilege.

Waytefee / watch-fee

Provisional

right_or_incident: Waytefee / watch-fee
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1329 Thomas Bardolf IPM/calendar material: Wormegay foreign tenants rendered 12d yearly per full knight's fee, called Waytefee; multiple Watlington fee holdings expressly rendered it.
historic_status: VERIFIED historic feudal burden on specified Watlington/Wormegay knight's-fee holdings; exact later Trussbut/Colts predecessor not identified.
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 12 first separately tracks Waytefee alongside Castelward. PASS 65 applies the same identity control: multiple distinct 1329 Watlington-linked fee blocks owed the same superior-honour burden, so shared Waytefee/Castelward service cannot by itself prove they were the same subordinate manor or the later Colts/Trusbut fee.
current_legal_category: Historic charge tied to medieval knight-service tenure; Tenures Abolition Act 1660 is the relevant abolition/conversion framework.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic Wormegay/Watlington burden only; no present Watlington-West liability established.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — Wormegay/Watlington predecessor context only
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC WATLINGTON BURDEN VERIFIED; COLTS LINK UNPROVED; NO CURRENT LIABILITY ESTABLISHED
next_decisive_document: Edward I eleven-membrane Wormegay fee/custom roll; original 1329 IPM membrane; fee-chain comparison through 1403/1427
notes: Track as a historic burden, not as a modern beneficial right.

Superior honour franchises — waifs / strays / soc / toll / team / infangthief

Documented

right_or_incident: Superior honour franchises — waifs / strays / soc / toll / team / infangthief
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1441 William Phelipp IPM, E-CIPM 25-481: honour/manor of Wormegay held with escheats, waifs, strays, soc, toll, team (thema), infangthief and other franchises.
historic_status: VERIFIED at superior Wormegay honour level; not verified as franchises of the subordinate Trussbut/Colts manor.
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 12 records the superior franchise ceiling expressly so later sources can be tested for delegation/exercise at the Trussbut submanor.
current_legal_category: Historic honour/franchise categories; no present Colts entitlement is evidenced by the superior grant alone.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: No deed, court record or later conveyance found that grants/exercises these franchises specifically for Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — superior honour only
present_claim_assessment: SUPERIOR WORMEGAY FRANCHISE HISTORY ONLY; NO PRESENT COLTS/WATLINGTON-WEST CLAIM
next_decisive_document: 1435-36 Watlington court roll; Edward I Wormegay fee/custom roll; HARE 4056; HARE 2495; Colt/Shouldham conveyances
notes: Grouped here to preserve the full 1441 franchise lead without inflating the Colts rights bundle.

Manor Research Archive

Structured evidence and source trail supporting the manor's historical and rights research.

Research summary / closure
Project result
The lordship/title survives for project purposes. No substantive manorial right is presently proved to be attached to, owned with, or exercisable through the current Watlington Colts/Trussbutts lordship.
Current substantive rights proved
0
Core separation rule
Lordship, land and individual rights are separate elements and must be proved by their own title/evidence chains.
Closure rule
Reopen a right only when an operative instrument identifies it, ties it to the manor, identifies benefited/burdened property where relevant, and supplies the modern chain/priority position.
Evidence records
28
Source records
201
Lordship title
Right / Element: Lordship title
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: It is the lordship itself
What the Right Actually Means: An incorporeal hereditament/title; may have no land or rights attached
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Chain of title to the lordship
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Can be transferred as title; land/rights may have separated earlier
Modern Registration Point: New first registration of lordship titles unavailable since 13 Oct 2003; existing registered lordships can still be dealt with
Current Watlington Status: Title chain treated separately from land/right chains
Authority: HMLR PG22
Manorial land
Right / Element: Manorial land
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes — land can be sold independently
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: Physical freehold/leasehold land formerly forming the manor
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Current land title and historic parcel identity
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Can be sold parcel by parcel independently of lordship
Modern Registration Point: Normal land-registration rules
Current Watlington Status: Historic manor extent does not prove present ownership
Authority: HMLR PG22
Fishing / piscary
Right / Element: Fishing / piscary
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: A right to take fish; can be a profit à prendre in gross and separately owned
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Existence of fishery/piscary, affected water/land, chain of title, current protection
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — may be sold, released or expressly extinguished
Modern Registration Point: May be registered/noted; post-2013 protection matters
Current Watlington Status: Not yet proved for Watlington
Authority: HMLR PG16; PG22; LPA 1922 Sch 12
Mines / minerals
Right / Element: Mines / minerals
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: Ownership/right in minerals may be severed from surface; working/access rights may be separate
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Which minerals, which parcels, reservations, enfranchisement, compensation and access rights
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — can be sold or expressly extinguished in compensation agreement
Modern Registration Point: Separate mineral registration/notices may exist
Current Watlington Status: Not yet proved for Watlington
Authority: HMLR PG65; Historical Rights; LPA 1922
Sporting / game
Right / Element: Sporting / game
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: Right to hunt/shoot/fish/fowl/take game over specified land; can be separate from surface ownership
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Exact right, affected parcels, reservation/grant, chain of title and protection
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — can be assigned/released/expressly extinguished
Modern Registration Point: Manorial rights lost automatic overriding status after 12 Oct 2013
Current Watlington Status: Not yet proved for Watlington
Authority: HMLR PG22; PG66; LPA 1922 Sch 12
Fairs / markets / warren / franchises
Right / Element: Fairs / markets / warren / franchises
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: Separate franchise/manorial privileges where historically granted and still subsisting
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Original grant/custom, devolution, non-extinguishment and any registration/protection
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes, depending on the right and subsequent instruments/statute
Modern Registration Point: Franchise/manorial-right registration rules may apply
Current Watlington Status: Not yet proved for Watlington
Authority: HMLR PG22; PG66; LPA 1922 Sch 12
Arbitrary fines / ordinary incidents
Right / Element: Arbitrary fines / ordinary incidents
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Historically attached to manor, but reform changed them
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: Copyhold incidents such as fines/rents/heriots/dues; Gawsels arbitrary fines proved in 1845
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Whether still subsisting at 1 Jan 1926 and whether compensation was paid
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — central subject of 1922 extinguishment/compensation regime
Modern Registration Point: Historic incidents do not simply revive because lordship survives
Current Watlington Status: Gawsels arbitrary fines proved in 1845; 1926/1929 survival unknown
Authority: White 1845; LPA 1922
12 Feb 1930 deed / general rights gateway
Right / Element: 12 Feb 1930 deed / general rights gateway
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes — rights can exist separately from land
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No — but deed expressly includes rights as a class
What the Right Actually Means: Primary 12 Feb 1930 conveyance: Humphreys, as beneficial owner, sells for £100 four named lordships (Watlington; Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham; Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts; Tottenhill) so far as subsisting, with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances.
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Prove each claimed right survived to 12 Feb 1930; inspect 16 Dec 1929 predecessor deed and all exclusions/reservations.
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — prior extinction/severance defeats transmission
Modern Registration Point: Modern priority remains separate after historic survival is proved
Current Watlington Status: Gateway expressly proved; exact individual rights remain survival-specific.
Authority: User-supplied primary deed; LPA 1925 s.62(3)
Free fold / fold liberty
Right / Element: Free fold / fold liberty
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Historically could exist as a manorial/customary liberty
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: 1506 free fold plus later Colts/Trusbutts fold-liberty evidence in prior rights project
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Exact identity/continuity and effect of 1749 Watlington inclosure
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Could be extinguished/transformed by enclosure/customary-tenure changes
Modern Registration Point: No modern exercisable right assumed
Current Watlington Status: Historic Colts candidate strong; survival to 1930 unproved/weak
Authority: Prior Rights Survival Ledger; 1506 fine; 1597 title material
Hare Estate sporting reservation (1943)
Right / Element: Hare Estate sporting reservation (1943)
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: Sporting rights expressly retained by Hare Estate in official Forestry plan's 1943 lease context
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Whether right covered historic Colts parcels and was appurtenant to Colts or separately severed
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Could later be assigned/released/extinguished
Modern Registration Point: Current burden/priority must be checked parcel-by-parcel
Current Watlington Status: Wider estate right verified; Colts connection unproved
Authority: Forestry England Shouldham & Bilney Forest Plan
Shouldham Woods freehold/reversion
Right / Element: Shouldham Woods freehold/reversion
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes — freehold can remain while a 999-year lease is granted
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: Underlying freehold/reversion behind Forestry's leasehold woodland management
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Registered freeholder, lease parties, parcel extent, later transfers and any reserved rights
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — freehold/reversion can itself be sold subject to lease
Modern Registration Point: Registered freehold and leasehold titles may be separate
Current Watlington Status: Forestry leasehold status proved; current legal freeholder not yet proved from Land Registry
Authority: Forestry England current plan; 1943 lease summary
Silica sand / Leziate Beds at Shouldham
Right / Element: Silica sand / Leziate Beds at Shouldham
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Mineral estate can be separate from surface and leasehold
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: Physical sand/mineral resource capable of separate mineral ownership and working rights
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Mineral ownership, parcel, depth/material definition, access/working rights and any reservations
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — mineral title/rights can be reserved, sold or extinguished separately
Modern Registration Point: Mineral notices/registrations and surface titles must be checked
Current Watlington Status: Resource/workings proved; title to minerals unproved
Authority: BGS memoir; Norfolk minerals planning; HMLR PG65
Sale / severance of physical land
Right / Element: Sale / severance of physical land
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes — rights can remain separate from land
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: A sale/transfer of land does not itself answer whether a manorial/sporting/mineral/piscary right was retained, transferred, reserved, released or already separately owned
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: The actual conveyance/lease, reservation clause, affected parcels and the pre-existing ownership of the right
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — rights can be transferred with land, expressly reserved, released, extinguished or already separately severed
Modern Registration Point: Modern registered title and notices can determine present burden/priority
Current Watlington Status: No blanket presumption. Every severance event must be deed-tested.
Authority: HMLR PG22/PG65/PG66; local Hare/Fodderston control evidence
Rabbit warren in 1845 Shouldham
Right / Element: Rabbit warren in 1845 Shouldham
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Potentially — franchise/sporting rights and physical warren land are distinct concepts
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: White describes the rabbit warren within Sir Thomas Hare's 2,674-acre landholding and names a warrener
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Whether there was a separate franchise/right of free warren, sporting right or merely estate rabbit-warren land/management
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes
Modern Registration Point: Any modern sporting/right burden must be separately protected/traced
Current Watlington Status: Hare landholding/warren management proved in 1845; separate Colts warren franchise not proved
Authority: White 1845 Shouldham; Norfolk Heritage Explorer rabbit-warren article
Historic gamekeeping / sporting enforcement
Right / Element: Historic gamekeeping / sporting enforcement
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Potentially
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: Appointment of gamekeepers and enforcement against trespass/poaching may evidence active sporting/game control
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Which manor/estate appointed the keeper, source of authority, exact land, and whether the sporting right was retained or passed later
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — sporting rights can be separately transferred/reserved/released
Modern Registration Point: Modern sporting right requires parcel/title/priority proof
Current Watlington Status: Sir Thomas Hare's Shouldham gamekeeping evidenced in 1779/1780; Colts identity unproved
Authority: Fincham Local History Society citing Wentworth; HMLR sporting-right framework
Fuel allotment / peat cutting
Right / Element: Fuel allotment / peat cutting
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes — resource-taking entitlement can be allocated separately
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: Defined poor-benefit entitlement under 1794 Shouldham Inclosure Award; White 1845 records 95A; council later describes peat cutting
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Full award, exact parcel, trustees/beneficiary administration, later charity schemes and modern title/common status
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes
Modern Registration Point: Depends on modern common/profit/title position
Current Watlington Status: Shouldham origin now proved to 1794 Inclosure Award; 1836 is later-use/context evidence; not a lord's right
Authority: Charity Commission 207556; White 1845 Shouldham; Shouldham Conservation Area Statement
999-year lease expiry / reversion
Right / Element: 999-year lease expiry / reversion
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Yes — the superior/freehold interest exists separately during the lease
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: A long lease grants a time-limited leasehold estate. GOV.UK explains that when the term ends the leaseholder's interest ends and the freeholder/superior reversioner has the right to occupy again, subject to any extension, surrender, merger or other legal change.
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Identify the exact 1943 commencement date, parties, superior estate, any later assignments/variations/enlargement and current HMLR freehold/reversion title.
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — either the lease or reversion can be dealt with; lease can end or be varied before expiry.
Modern Registration Point: Registered freehold/reversion and leasehold titles should identify the current legal interests.
Current Watlington Status: The Watlington-Colts lordship does NOT automatically receive the woodland at lease expiry. That would require the lordship holder also to own the superior/freehold reversion; no such connection is currently proved.
Authority: GOV.UK leasehold guidance; HMRC CG70703/CG70224; HMLR PG26; Forestry England Shouldham plan
Forestry administrative forest/unit acreage
Right / Element: Forestry administrative forest/unit acreage
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: No — an administrative unit can include multiple legal interests or component forests
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: Annual-report forest-unit acreage is operational/administrative evidence, not automatically the acreage of one lease/freehold/title. Pass 50 proves Shouldham and Gaywood were amalgamated into Lynn Forest in 1960.
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: Working plan, component/compartment maps, acquisition/lease files and registered titles
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — component parcels/tenures may be added, removed, surrendered, purchased or simply regrouped administratively
Modern Registration Point: Modern title/lease registers remain decisive for proprietary boundaries
Current Watlington Status: Pass 50: 1953 Shouldham 956 acres; 1954/59 1,290; 1960 Lynn expressly comprises former Gaywood + Shouldham. Never infer legal lease shrinkage/expansion from forest-unit totals alone.
Authority: Forestry Commission annual reports 1949, 1953, 1954, 1959, 1960, 1965, 1966; TNA F37
Forgotten / reputed manor land
Right / Element: Forgotten / reputed manor land
Can Exist Without Manorial Land?: Not applicable — this is corporeal land that may still be conveyed with a manor if it remains legally/reputedly part of it
Does Bare Lordship Prove It?: No
What the Right Actually Means: LPA 1925 s.62(3) can carry the ground/soil and hereditaments appertaining or reputed to appertain to a manor, or reputed/known as part, parcel or member. A 1975 Norfolk Commons Commissioner decision provides a concrete example.
What Must Be Proved for Watlington: For each Colts parcel: historic manor connection; continuity/reputation at each conveyance; vendor's title in 1930; absence of earlier distinct severance; exact modern parcel/title.
Could It Have Been Extinguished / Sold?: Yes — a distinct freehold conveyance can sever land from the manor. Comber [2026] EWHC 1244 (Admin), citing Delacherois, confirms the principle.
Modern Registration Point: Use HMLR index-map/title plans and first-registration history only after historic parcel crosswalk. Commons-register files may also preserve forgotten ownership evidence.
Current Watlington Status: LEGALLY PLAUSIBLE CATEGORY. Strong historic Colts parcels are identified, but no present parcel has yet been proved still to belong to the Watlington-Colts title.
Authority: LPA 1925 s.62(3)-(5); Commons Commissioner Drabblegate 1975; Comber [2026] EWHC 1244 (Admin); Delacherois v Delacherois
17 Mar 1597 — George Colt conveyed the Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts manor with appurtenances in Watlington and, in the same bargain-and-sale, associated Colt messuages, lands and tenements in Runcton Holme, Thorpland, Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, the Wiggenhalls, Terrington and Marshland.
Date / Period: 17 Mar 1597
Physical Land / Estate Event: George Colt conveyed the Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts manor with appurtenances in Watlington and, in the same bargain-and-sale, associated Colt messuages, lands and tenements in Runcton Holme, Thorpland, Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, the Wiggenhalls, Terrington and Marshland.
Lordship / Title Event: George Colt -> Thomas Shouldham; Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes expressly named
Rights Event: General appurtenances conveyed; HARE 2403 later records liberty of a fold
Evidence / Record: HARE 2402 / HARE 2403
What It Shows: The 1597 transaction was geographically broader than the later Colt's Hall core. It proves a wide Colt estate package was conveyed together, but the catalogue abstract does not establish that every outlying parcel was technically a member/appurtenance of Watlington Colts.
Colts Connection: Direct
Current Interpretation: Historic bundled conveyance stage, now split for recovery analysis into (1) proven Colts core and (2) outlying Colt estate conveyed in the same deed.
Next Decisive Document: Full HARE 2402/2403 scans
1749 — Watlington commons/wastes subjected to inclosure; surviving award extract MS 7245, 7B4
Date / Period: 1749
Physical Land / Estate Event: Watlington commons/wastes subjected to inclosure; surviving award extract MS 7245, 7B4
Lordship / Title Event: No title transfer proved by the extract
Rights Event: Potential transformation of fold, common, waste, roads/drains and possible reservations
Evidence / Record: Watlington Inclosure Act / MS 7245, 7B4
What It Shows: Major rights/land transformation gate
Colts Connection: Watlington-specific; exact Colts/Gawsels allocation unresolved
Current Interpretation: Potential first major severance/transformation point
Next Decisive Document: Full award, map, claims and commissioners' papers
1794–1798 — Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe common fields, half-year lands, lammas, commons/wastes reorganised Pass 107 adds a quantified historical control: Cooke's enclosure table records the combined 'Shouldham and Garboiesthorpe' entry as 5,570 acres for 1794.
Date / Period: 1794–1798
Physical Land / Estate Event: Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe common fields, half-year lands, lammas, commons/wastes reorganised Pass 107 adds a quantified historical control: Cooke's enclosure table records the combined 'Shouldham and Garboiesthorpe' entry as 5,570 acres for 1794.
Lordship / Title Event: Hare estate remains major Shouldham landholder
Rights Event: Roads/drains/fences/allotments reorganised; surviving copy includes Thomas Hare timber licence
Evidence / Record: 1798 enclosure schedule + 1795/96 notices + Cooke/Arthur Young enclosure table (direct searchable transcription)
What It Shows: Separate Shouldham transformation regime The 5,570-acre figure gives the scale of the combined parliamentary-enclosure entry, not the acreage of the Colts estate or any proprietor's allotment.
Colts Connection: Wider Hare/Shouldham; do not auto-import into Colts
Current Interpretation: Potential land/right restructuring before 19th-century estate consolidation PASS 107: 5,570 acres is a landscape-scale enclosure control only; no Colts parcel allocation follows from it.
Next Decisive Document: Full facsimile/award/map Full 1798 schedule/award/map remains necessary for named allottees and parcel-level severance.
3 Oct 1871 / post-1874 + 1875 directory cross-control — Hare estate schedules expressly include Colts Farm in Shouldham. In the 1875 Court Directory Charles Lemmon is directly listed at Colts Hall; the 1875 Shouldham parish entry separately lists him as farmer.
Date / Period: 3 Oct 1871 / post-1874 + 1875 directory cross-control
Physical Land / Estate Event: Hare estate schedules expressly include Colts Farm in Shouldham. In the 1875 Court Directory Charles Lemmon is directly listed at Colts Hall; the 1875 Shouldham parish entry separately lists him as farmer.
Lordship / Title Event: Reported lordship-sale chronology places the Watlington/Gawsels title transition around 1869; Sir Thomas Hare is nevertheless still stated in the 1875 Shouldham directory to be lord of the manor of Shouldham. This is a different manor-title statement and must not be conflated with Watlington-Colts.
Rights Event: No surviving Colts-specific right/reservation wording has yet been read.
Evidence / Record: HARE 5466 222 x 5 + Kelly/Post Office Directory 1875 Shouldham parish page + Norfolk Court Directory p.563
What It Shows: This is the strongest same-period public alignment so far: Colts Farm is inside Hare estate schedule material post-1874; Hare/Stephen Allen are the parish's principal landowners; Charles Lemmon is separately a farmer and is specifically resident/located at Colts Hall.
Colts Connection: Direct to Colts Farm and Colts Hall.
Current Interpretation: [Inference] Strongly favours physical Colts Farm remaining in the Hare estate landholding/administrative stream with Lemmon as operator/occupier around 1875. If the separate reported 1869 Watlington-Colts lordship transfer is confirmed, this is strong evidence of land/title separation. It is not yet a legal freehold finding.
Next Decisive Document: Full HARE 5466 Colts Farm schedule; then 1843 tithe/HARE 5370/1910 valuation to prove owner, tenant, acreage and chain.
Late 19th century — Forestry England retrospectively states Stow Bardolph Estate owned Shouldham Woods
Date / Period: Late 19th century
Physical Land / Estate Event: Forestry England retrospectively states Stow Bardolph Estate owned Shouldham Woods
Lordship / Title Event: Separate Coote/Gawsels/Colts title chronology developing
Rights Event: Estate later known as farming and shooting estate
Evidence / Record: Forestry England Forest Plan p.10
What It Shows: Direct pre-1943 physical ownership anchor
Colts Connection: Wider Hare/Stow estate
Current Interpretation: Woodland freehold remained in estate stream
Next Decisive Document: Underlying estate deeds / tithe / OS parcel matching
c.1900 — Five OS sheets marked for land exchange between Hare and Hoff across Shouldham/Thorpe/Marham/Wormegay
Date / Period: c.1900
Physical Land / Estate Event: Five OS sheets marked for land exchange between Hare and Hoff across Shouldham/Thorpe/Marham/Wormegay
Lordship / Title Event: No lordship transfer stated
Rights Event: Possible reservation/severance of sporting/mineral/access/timber rights
Evidence / Record: HARE 6956/1-5; related HARE 6374-5
What It Shows: Concrete parcel exchange immediately before 20th-century title era
Colts Connection: Potentially affects Colts Farm/Shouldham parcels; not yet mapped
Current Interpretation: Critical severance event
Next Decisive Document: HARE 6374/6375 papers + coloured HARE 6956 plans
16 Dec 1929 — Hereditaments conveyed by Green + Public Trustee to Humphreys in fee simple
Date / Period: 16 Dec 1929
Physical Land / Estate Event: Hereditaments conveyed by Green + Public Trustee to Humphreys in fee simple
Lordship / Title Event: Immediate predecessor to 1930 four-lordship conveyance
Rights Event: Unknown reservations/exceptions
Evidence / Record: Recital in 12 Feb 1930 deed
What It Shows: Potential final pre-Edleston land/right severance point
Colts Connection: Direct to the later conveyed hereditaments
Current Interpretation: Critical missing predecessor deed
Next Decisive Document: Full 16 Dec 1929 conveyance
12 Feb 1930 — No broad physical estate acreage is expressly established by current abstract
Date / Period: 12 Feb 1930
Physical Land / Estate Event: No broad physical estate acreage is expressly established by current abstract
Lordship / Title Event: Humphreys -> Edleston: four manors/lordships including Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts
Rights Event: Then-subsisting rights, royalties, members and appurtenances expressly conveyed
Evidence / Record: Private 1930 deed
What It Shows: Strong incorporeal title/rights gateway but only for rights still subsisting
Colts Connection: Direct
Current Interpretation: Modern title/right stream clearly distinct from wider Hare/Stow physical estate unless parcel proof reconnects them
Next Decisive Document: Full predecessor/root deeds and parcel schedules
1943 — 372ha Shouldham Warren + Sincks leased for 999 years from Hare Estate at Stow Bardolph
Date / Period: 1943
Physical Land / Estate Event: 372ha Shouldham Warren + Sincks leased for 999 years from Hare Estate at Stow Bardolph
Lordship / Title Event: No Colts title transaction
Rights Event: Sporting rights retained by the estate
Evidence / Record: Forestry England Forest Plan + current plan webpage + Forestry Commission 1943 Annual Report + Norfolk County Council 2022 Topic Paper
What It Shows: Official sources establish that Forestry's Shouldham interest is leasehold/management, not Forestry freehold; a separate landowner existed and the estate retained sporting rights. [Inference] The superior/reversionary estate therefore remained outside Forestry, but its exact legal proprietor and the detailed reservations require the lease/HMLR titles.
Colts Connection: Wider Hare/Stow estate; no document found tying the 372ha Warren/Sincks demise to Watlington Colts/Trusbutts.
Current Interpretation: Forestry = long leaseholder/manager. Current public evidence names Stow Estates as owner of Sincks in 2021; current registered proprietor of Warren is not verified. No evidence shows the Watlington-Colts lordship receives or owns this land merely because the lease exists.
Next Decisive Document: Actual 1943 lease + current HMLR freehold/reversion and leasehold registers/title plans + filed lease
12 Jul 2010 — Stow Estate stated at c.4,000 acres and retaining Hall Farm property
Date / Period: 12 Jul 2010
Physical Land / Estate Event: Stow Estate stated at c.4,000 acres and retaining Hall Farm property
Lordship / Title Event: No Colts lordship statement
Rights Event: Estate expressly described as traditional farming and shooting estate
Evidence / Record: King's Lynn & West Norfolk planning report
What It Shows: Large Hare/Stow land/sporting estate still operational in modern era
Colts Connection: Wider estate only
Current Interpretation: Continuity of Stow physical/sporting estate strengthened
Next Decisive Document: Current registered titles / estate trust documents
23 Jan 2021 — Shouldham Parish Council says Shouldham Sincks is owned by Stow Estates
Date / Period: 23 Jan 2021
Physical Land / Estate Event: Shouldham Parish Council says Shouldham Sincks is owned by Stow Estates
Lordship / Title Event: No Colts title statement
Rights Event: Forestry plan says estate sporting rights exercised in Sincks
Evidence / Record: Shouldham Parish Council + Forestry England
What It Shows: Current landowner statement aligns geographically with retained sporting-right area
Colts Connection: Colts connection unproved
Current Interpretation: Strong current wider-estate land/right continuity
Next Decisive Document: Land Registry freehold + leasehold titles
1845 — Sir Thomas Hare owns 2,674 of Shouldham's 3,775 acres including a rabbit warren; Charles Lemmon occupies Colts Hall
Date / Period: 1845
Physical Land / Estate Event: Sir Thomas Hare owns 2,674 of Shouldham's 3,775 acres including a rabbit warren; Charles Lemmon occupies Colts Hall
Lordship / Title Event: Hare described as lord of the manor of Shouldham; exact manor style not specified
Rights Event: Warrener William Brighton separately manages rabbit warren
Evidence / Record: White 1845 Shouldham
What It Shows: Major estate land, warren management and Colts Hall occupation are visibly separable functions
Colts Connection: Colts Hall physical occupation direct; Colts lordship identity unproved from directory
Current Interpretation: Strong mid-19th-century land/occupation control
Next Decisive Document: Estate leases, HARE schedules, 1634 warren lease
1912 — Hare remains principal landowner/lord; Henry Hoff also appears as principal landowner; Walter Lemmon at Colts Hall
Date / Period: 1912
Physical Land / Estate Event: Hare remains principal landowner/lord; Henry Hoff also appears as principal landowner; Walter Lemmon at Colts Hall
Lordship / Title Event: Hare still described as lord of the manor
Rights Event: No reservations stated
Evidence / Record: Kelly directory scan + HARE 6956 c.1900 exchange
What It Shows: Post-exchange ownership pattern corroborates that Hoff acquired meaningful land while Colts Hall stayed separately occupied
Colts Connection: Potentially relevant to Colts parcels; exact exchanged plots unknown
Current Interpretation: Strong corroboration of c.1900 parcel severance
Next Decisive Document: HARE 6374/6375 + HARE 6956/1-5
1616–1634 — Shouldham Warren already exists; by 1634 a lease requires rabbits to be supplied to household
Date / Period: 1616–1634
Physical Land / Estate Event: Shouldham Warren already exists; by 1634 a lease requires rabbits to be supplied to household
Lordship / Title Event: Hare-era estate consolidation follows by 1632
Rights Event: Commercial rabbit-warren use / fixed-rent lease model
Evidence / Record: Explore West Norfolk + Norfolk Heritage Explorer
What It Shows: Warren is a real economic land use before later woodland
Colts Connection: Wider Shouldham; Colts connection unproved
Current Interpretation: Historic warren economy precedes later Hare sporting estate
Next Decisive Document: Exact 1634 lease
1779–1780 — Hare manor/estate at Shouldham actively policed for game
Date / Period: 1779–1780
Physical Land / Estate Event: Hare manor/estate at Shouldham actively policed for game
Lordship / Title Event: Sir Thomas Hare's manor at Shouldham
Rights Event: Joseph Forby appointed gamekeeper; gun-seizure litigation
Evidence / Record: Fincham Local History Society citing Wentworth
What It Shows: Active gamekeeping/enforcement rather than merely nominal sporting terminology
Colts Connection: Wider Shouldham; exact Colts manor identity unproved
Current Interpretation: Strong historic sporting-control stage
Next Decisive Document: Underlying pleading + estate gamekeeper records
1794 award; use/status recorded 1836/1845 — Shouldham Poors' Land and Fuel Allotment created under 1794 Inclosure Award; 95A recorded in 1845; poor cut peat/turf
Date / Period: 1794 award; use/status recorded 1836/1845
Physical Land / Estate Event: Shouldham Poors' Land and Fuel Allotment created under 1794 Inclosure Award; 95A recorded in 1845; poor cut peat/turf
Lordship / Title Event: No title change
Rights Event: Separate poor-benefit resource entitlement created by enclosure award
Evidence / Record: Charity Commission 207556 + White 1845 + Shouldham Conservation Area Statement
What It Shows: Resource/common rights could be allocated to non-lord beneficiaries under a specific award
Colts Connection: Wider Shouldham only; not Colts title evidence
Current Interpretation: Legal origin fixed to 1794; 1836 is later-use/context, not creation
Next Decisive Document: Full P.R. 29.(1) p.520 / 1794 award, map, trustees and later charity schemes
1847–1890 — Extensive tree planting converts former warren landscape toward woodland estate
Date / Period: 1847–1890
Physical Land / Estate Event: Extensive tree planting converts former warren landscape toward woodland estate
Lordship / Title Event: Hare estate remains dominant landholder
Rights Event: Economic land use shifts from rabbit warren toward forestry while sporting uses continue later
Evidence / Record: Explore West Norfolk
What It Shows: Physical land use changes without itself determining incorporeal rights
Colts Connection: Wider Hare/Shouldham
Current Interpretation: Transition toward woodland later leased to Forestry
Next Decisive Document: Estate planting/wood books; later lease
1845–1896 title/land divergence control — 1845 Sir Thomas Hare owns 2,674 acres of Shouldham including rabbit warren; 1871/post-1874 Hare schedules list Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm as separate estate units; 1896 Hare remains lord/principal landowner in Shouldham.
Date / Period: 1845–1896 title/land divergence control
Physical Land / Estate Event: 1845 Sir Thomas Hare owns 2,674 acres of Shouldham including rabbit warren; 1871/post-1874 Hare schedules list Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm as separate estate units; 1896 Hare remains lord/principal landowner in Shouldham.
Lordship / Title Event: 1845 Charles Berners Plestow is lord of Gawsels in Watlington; by 1883 George Coote is lord of Gawsels while Rev. Canon Birch owns most Watlington soil/Hall.
Rights Event: Shows lordship, surface land, farm tenancies and sporting/warren land could and did follow different ownership/administrative streams.
Evidence / Record: White 1845 Shouldham; White 1845/1883 Watlington; HARE 5466; Kelly 1896 Shouldham
What It Shows: Direct period evidence of land/title separation before the 1930 Edleston title conveyance and 1943 Forestry lease.
Colts Connection: Physical Colts land proved, but Warren/Sincks not proved as Colts land.
Current Interpretation: Strong evidence against assuming the 1943 Hare Estate woodland was automatically land of the Watlington-Colts lordship.
Next Decisive Document: Parcel-level HARE estate maps/exchanges + 1930 predecessor deed + 1943 lease + HMLR titles
1941–1943 — National Farm Survey captures farms/holdings and mapped boundaries immediately before/around the 1943 Forestry lease.
Date / Period: 1941–1943
Physical Land / Estate Event: National Farm Survey captures farms/holdings and mapped boundaries immediately before/around the 1943 Forestry lease.
Lordship / Title Event: No lordship transfer established by the survey route.
Rights Event: Can identify owner-versus-tenant status, rent/occupancy and exact holding boundaries; potentially separates Hare/Stow physical estate from other Shouldham holdings.
Evidence / Record: TNA MAF 32 individual farm records + MAF 73 maps
What It Shows: Independent government snapshot of land ownership/occupation just before the lease, outside the Hare archive.
Colts Connection: To be tested by matching Colts Farm, Warren/Sincks and surrounding holdings.
Current Interpretation: Critical pre-lease ownership control; stronger than relying only on later estate narrative.
Next Decisive Document: Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe MAF 73 map sheets + corresponding MAF 32 forms
1904 / 1905 publication — 25-inch OS sheet LVII.7 records detailed Shouldham physical boundaries after the HARE 5466 estate-schedule period.
Date / Period: 1904 / 1905 publication
Physical Land / Estate Event: 25-inch OS sheet LVII.7 records detailed Shouldham physical boundaries after the HARE 5466 estate-schedule period.
Lordship / Title Event: No lordship/title disposition recorded by OS.
Rights Event: No proprietary rights recorded.
Evidence / Record: Ordnance Survey Norfolk LVII.7, depicted 1904 / published 1905
What It Shows: High-resolution pre-1930 parcel geometry for crosswalking the Colts core.
Colts Connection: Direct geographic coverage of Shouldham; Colts ownership is not inferred from map alone.
Current Interpretation: Important physical-boundary bridge between late-Hare estate records and 1930.
Next Decisive Document: MAF 50/F estate files, Forestry maps/working plans, lease variations/surrenders, HMLR titles
1910–1915 — Valuation Office survey mapped hereditaments and linked them to field books recording owners, occupiers, interests, area and rent/value.
Date / Period: 1910–1915
Physical Land / Estate Event: Valuation Office survey mapped hereditaments and linked them to field books recording owners, occupiers, interests, area and rent/value.
Lordship / Title Event: Could directly identify whether Colt's Hall/Farm was freehold/copyhold and who held it before 1930 once exact assessment is found.
Rights Event: May record easements/ways or other valuation deductions, but not a substitute for title deeds.
Evidence / Record: TNA Valuation Office Survey — annotated plans + IR 58 field books
What It Shows: Potentially decisive ownership/extent snapshot between 1904 OS and 1929/1930 deeds.
Colts Connection: Targeted specifically to Colt's Hall/Farm; exact assessment not yet found.
Current Interpretation: CRITICAL unresolved pre-1930 ownership bridge.
Next Decisive Document: Actual 1943 lease + post-1945 title/vesting record + HMLR leasehold register
1927 / 1928 publication — Revised 25-inch OS sheet LVII.7 supplies near-contemporaneous physical boundaries shortly before the 1929 and 1930 deeds.
Date / Period: 1927 / 1928 publication
Physical Land / Estate Event: Revised 25-inch OS sheet LVII.7 supplies near-contemporaneous physical boundaries shortly before the 1929 and 1930 deeds.
Lordship / Title Event: No title ownership recorded.
Rights Event: No proprietary rights recorded.
Evidence / Record: Ordnance Survey Norfolk LVII.7, depicted 1927 / published 1928
What It Shows: Lets the audit distinguish physical continuity from legal continuity at the exact pre-conveyance stage.
Colts Connection: Direct geographic coverage; proprietary Colts status requires valuation/title records.
Current Interpretation: Final cartographic boundary gate before modern title instruments.
Next Decisive Document: F37 working plans / unit histories
30 Sep 1953 -> 30 Sep 1954 — Shouldham Forestry unit increases from 956 acres to 1,290 acres (+334 acres).
Date / Period: 30 Sep 1953 -> 30 Sep 1954
Physical Land / Estate Event: Shouldham Forestry unit increases from 956 acres to 1,290 acres (+334 acres).
Lordship / Title Event: No lordship event proved.
Rights Event: A measurable addition/reclassification occurred within one reporting year; precise legal mechanism unverified.
Evidence / Record: Forestry Commission 34th and 35th Annual Reports
What It Shows: Could reflect acquisition by lease/purchase, supplemental land, administrative inclusion or re-survey; report does not localize mechanism.
Colts Connection: No Colts connection.
Current Interpretation: NARROWS KEY CHANGE WINDOW TO 1953-54.
Next Decisive Document: F37 Shouldham working plan; MAF50/F estate files; supplemental lease/title
30 Sep 1960 — Former Gaywood and Shouldham Forests are amalgamated into Lynn Forest; combined total 2,858 acres.
Date / Period: 30 Sep 1960
Physical Land / Estate Event: Former Gaywood and Shouldham Forests are amalgamated into Lynn Forest; combined total 2,858 acres.
Lordship / Title Event: No lordship event.
Rights Event: Administrative merger expressly proved; later Lynn acreage is combined, not Shouldham-only.
Evidence / Record: Forestry Commission 41st Annual Report, Table 28 footnote
What It Shows: Corrects direct unit-to-modern-lease comparisons.
Colts Connection: No Colts connection.
Current Interpretation: DO NOT TREAT LYNN UNIT ACREAGE AS THE 1943 SHOULDHAM LEASE AREA.
Next Decisive Document: F37 Lynn/Shouldham/Gaywood working plans; lease/title maps
30 Sep 1965 -> 30 Sep 1966; persists to 1970/71 — Combined Lynn Forest falls from 2,698 to 2,474 acres (-224); official research still identifies 'Lynn Forest, Shouldham'.
Date / Period: 30 Sep 1965 -> 30 Sep 1966; persists to 1970/71
Physical Land / Estate Event: Combined Lynn Forest falls from 2,698 to 2,474 acres (-224); official research still identifies 'Lynn Forest, Shouldham'.
Lordship / Title Event: No lordship event.
Rights Event: Some combined-unit adjustment occurred but Shouldham site identity continues.
Evidence / Record: Forestry Commission annual reports + Forest Research reports
What It Shows: Cannot allocate the 224-acre change to Shouldham/Gaywood or identify it as disposal/surrender without file-level evidence.
Colts Connection: No Colts connection.
Current Interpretation: Operational continuity survives the acreage change; legal parcel effect unresolved.
Next Decisive Document: F37 working plans; estate disposal/adjustment files; lease variations; titles
1633 — HARE 2495 field book identifies a corporeal Colts estate: capital messuage + Colt's close (6a), four tenements/yards, alder carr nearly 7a, Appletons 5a, Batchelors just over 9a
Date / Period: 1633
Physical Land / Estate Event: HARE 2495 field book identifies a corporeal Colts estate: capital messuage + Colt's close (6a), four tenements/yards, alder carr nearly 7a, Appletons 5a, Batchelors just over 9a
Lordship / Title Event: Colts/Trussbutts manor identifiable in Shouldham
Rights Event: Tenure of parts split among tenant farmer and two others; proprietary lordship/estate still documented together
Evidence / Record: Historic England citing NRO HARE 2495
What It Shows: Positive parcel-level starting inventory for land-recovery audit
Colts Connection: Direct
Current Interpretation: These are candidate historic Colts parcels, not automatically present manor land
Next Decisive Document: Full HARE 2495 field book + contemporary plan if any
1811–1818 — Estate map shows Colt's Farm including the whole later scheduled monument area
Date / Period: 1811–1818
Physical Land / Estate Event: Estate map shows Colt's Farm including the whole later scheduled monument area
Lordship / Title Event: Hare estate era
Rights Event: Physical estate continuity visible despite later possibility of lordship/land separation
Evidence / Record: Historic England cites HARE 6832 ('Map of Estates of Sir Thomas Hare', 1811); CBTM separately catalogues HARE 5185 231x2 (Wiggins 1811-1818) as a broader Hare estate map
What It Shows: Bridges 1633 Colts parcels into early-19C estate geography through Historic England. Pass 87 separates the map references: the CBTM downloadable HARE 5185 PDF is only a Downham Market crop, so it is NOT direct visual evidence of the Shouldham section.
Colts Connection: Direct physical-land continuity
Current Interpretation: Critical parcel crosswalk before 1843 tithe; source references now separated rather than merged
Next Decisive Document: Obtain full Shouldham sections of HARE 6832 and HARE 5185; compare legends/plot geometry and determine whether they are distinct maps, copies or revisions
1843 — Tithe apportionment calls area east/southeast of Colt's Hall the farm Homestall; Batchelors is Further Homestall
Date / Period: 1843
Physical Land / Estate Event: Tithe apportionment calls area east/southeast of Colt's Hall the farm Homestall; Batchelors is Further Homestall
Lordship / Title Event: No title transfer established by tithe terminology
Rights Event: No separate-right conclusion
Evidence / Record: Historic England summary of 1843 tithe + Norfolk County Council Historic Maps tithe service/apportionment guidance
What It Shows: Confirms Colt's Farm field identity after 1811 mapping. Pass 87 supplies the exact ownership-recovery method: read the numbered Shouldham tithe-map plots digitally, then request the undigitised NRO apportionment entries for owner, occupier, field name, cultivation and acreage.
Colts Connection: Direct to Colt's Farm land
Current Interpretation: Strongest pre-1869 mapped-name continuity currently public; owner/occupier extraction now has an exact two-stage route
Next Decisive Document: Read Shouldham plot numbers at Colt's Hall/Homestall/Further Homestall from NCC map -> request those plot entries from NRO tithe apportionment
1849 — John Wiggins survey, terrier and valuation exists as NRO HARE 5370 221 X 6
Date / Period: 1849
Physical Land / Estate Event: John Wiggins survey, terrier and valuation exists as NRO HARE 5370 221 X 6
Lordship / Title Event: Hare estate survey era
Rights Event: Unknown until terrier read
Evidence / Record: Agricultural History Review exact archive citation
What It Shows: Potentially supplies estate owner/tenant/acreage/value immediately after tithe and before HARE 5466
Colts Connection: Target; Colts occurrence not yet verified
Current Interpretation: Critical missing bridge
Next Decisive Document: Full HARE 5370 221 X 6
15 Jul 1977 — Shouldham Village Green had no registered owner and no claimant after public notice; Commissioner ordered registration to Parish Council
Date / Period: 15 Jul 1977
Physical Land / Estate Event: Shouldham Village Green had no registered owner and no claimant after public notice; Commissioner ordered registration to Parish Council
Lordship / Title Event: No Colts title finding
Rights Event: No Colts rights finding
Evidence / Record: Commons Commissioner VG.168 decision
What It Shows: Demonstrates real local loss of ownership memory and supplies a boundary control beside historic Colts tenements
Colts Connection: Adjacent to known Colts tenements; Green itself unproved Colts
Current Interpretation: Forgotten ownership is factually possible locally, but this statutory vesting is not theft evidence
Next Decisive Document: VG168 register map/file + overlay with HARE 2495/1843 tithe
1794 (34 Geo.3 c.85 Pr.) -> 1796 -> 1798 — The exact private Act, 34 Geo.3 c.85 Pr. (royal assent 23 May 1794), authorised division/allotment/enclosure of common fields, half-year lands, lammas meadows, commons and waste in Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe/Garboise Thorpe. The 1796 road notice then sets roads over named greens/commons and beside Thomas Hare parcels; the 1798 printed schedule covers public allotments, roads, footpaths, drain, fences and rules.
Date / Period: 1794 (34 Geo.3 c.85 Pr.) -> 1796 -> 1798
Physical Land / Estate Event: The exact private Act, 34 Geo.3 c.85 Pr. (royal assent 23 May 1794), authorised division/allotment/enclosure of common fields, half-year lands, lammas meadows, commons and waste in Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe/Garboise Thorpe. The 1796 road notice then sets roads over named greens/commons and beside Thomas Hare parcels; the 1798 printed schedule covers public allotments, roads, footpaths, drain, fences and rules.
Lordship / Title Event: No Watlington-Colts lordship transfer proved by these enclosure records.
Rights Event: Potential conversion/reallocation of common, waste, road, drainage and boundary land; exact private allotments/reservations not yet read.
Evidence / Record: Commons Journal 1794 + 34 Geo.3 c.85 Pr. statutory citation + 1796 commissioners' notice + 1798 schedule metadata
What It Shows: Provides a concrete mechanism by which old common/waste geography could be allocated into new private parcels while also creating road, verge, drain and boundary residue that requires later title tracing.
Colts Connection: Indirect until the enclosure schedule/map is overlaid against proven Colts parcels and Hare 1633/1811 evidence.
Current Interpretation: CRITICAL TRANSFORMATION LAYER — strengthens the residual-fragment audit but proves no surviving Colts parcel by itself.
Next Decisive Document: Obtain full 1798 schedule and any award/map; test exact Colts names/parcels against HARE 2495/HARE 2826/HARE 6832 and the 1843 tithe. The 1796 notice yielded no direct Batchelors/Appletons/Beerway/Colts-name match.
1845 micro-parcel control — White records a 95-acre Shouldham Fuel Allotment and separately 'one rood of old poor's land' let for 12s.
Date / Period: 1845 micro-parcel control
Physical Land / Estate Event: White records a 95-acre Shouldham Fuel Allotment and separately 'one rood of old poor's land' let for 12s.
Lordship / Title Event: No Colts/lordship transfer shown
Rights Event: Tiny distinct poor-land holding survives alongside larger allotment and Hare estate
Evidence / Record: White 1845 Shouldham
What It Shows: Local proof that a very small historically distinct parcel could remain separately identifiable rather than being absorbed into a surrounding estate.
Colts Connection: Wider Shouldham only; not Colts land
Current Interpretation: Important residual-parcel control; strengthens search method, not claimant title.
Next Decisive Document: Trace old poor's land in later charity/enclosure records and HMLR.
1962–2024/current charity-land continuity control — Charity 207556 remains registered; Commission says it owns and/or leases land/property; council says Shouldham Poors Charity offered allotment land at Mill Road for a community orchard.
Date / Period: 1962–2024/current charity-land continuity control
Physical Land / Estate Event: Charity 207556 remains registered; Commission says it owns and/or leases land/property; council says Shouldham Poors Charity offered allotment land at Mill Road for a community orchard.
Lordship / Title Event: No Watlington-Colts title change
Rights Event: Special-purpose land/property stream remains identifiable in modern administration
Evidence / Record: Charity Commission 207556 + West Norfolk CIL FY24_2
What It Shows: Shows that old enclosure/poor-land institutions can retain or lease identifiable land into the modern period.
Colts Connection: Exact link between Mill Road parcel, charity 207556 and the original 1794 95A/one-rood land not yet proved.
Current Interpretation: Strong modern local control; not Colts ownership evidence.
Next Decisive Document: Confirm charity identity; obtain parcel/title/site plan; compare 1794 award, 1845 directory and ACC 2022/153 fuel papers.
2009 Trussbot Lodge correction — Official conservation statement treats erection of Trussbot Lodge as twentieth-century/post-war development and calls Trussbot a modern suburban-type house.
Date / Period: 2009 Trussbot Lodge correction
Physical Land / Estate Event: Official conservation statement treats erection of Trussbot Lodge as twentieth-century/post-war development and calls Trussbot a modern suburban-type house.
Lordship / Title Event: None
Rights Event: Modern commemorative/place-name use can mimic historic manor names without parcel continuity
Evidence / Record: West Norfolk Shouldham Conservation Area Character Statement
What It Shows: Prevents a false parcel-continuity inference from the modern Trussbot/Trussbut name beside The Green.
Colts Connection: Not a severance event; negative evidential control.
Current Interpretation: Historic-name lead closed; retain only as modern locator.
Next Decisive Document: Do not prioritise Trussbot Lodge unless independent historic deeds/map labels surface.
7 Apr 1911 — Norfolk County Council sought to acquire a 30-acre Shouldham field for small holdings; the Board refused confirmation because of hardship to the owner-occupier, who offered another 16-acre field adjoining other small holdings.
Date / Period: 7 Apr 1911
Physical Land / Estate Event: Norfolk County Council sought to acquire a 30-acre Shouldham field for small holdings; the Board refused confirmation because of hardship to the owner-occupier, who offered another 16-acre field adjoining other small holdings.
Lordship / Title Event: No lordship/title transfer stated.
Rights Event: Potential statutory/tenurial reorganisation; actual 30-acre acquisition did not proceed under this order.
Evidence / Record: UK Parliament Hansard — Small Holdings
What It Shows: Directly proves early-20th-century Shouldham farm land was being considered for subdivision/reallocation under small-holdings legislation.
Colts Connection: No Colts connection stated.
Current Interpretation: LOCAL FRAGMENTATION CONTROL — important immediately before the 1929/1930 title period, but not a Colts severance finding.
Next Decisive Document: Norfolk County Small Holdings Committee minutes; Board of Agriculture order/commissioner report; identify farm/owner and 30A/16A maps.
15 Jan 1985 — Alfred G. Pearce (Farms) Ltd mortgaged a distinct 10-acre freehold parcel described as 'near the hall' in Shouldham; charge satisfied 2009 and a release statement was filed in 1992.
Date / Period: 15 Jan 1985
Physical Land / Estate Event: Alfred G. Pearce (Farms) Ltd mortgaged a distinct 10-acre freehold parcel described as 'near the hall' in Shouldham; charge satisfied 2009 and a release statement was filed in 1992.
Lordship / Title Event: No manorial-title transfer stated.
Rights Event: Modern distinct-freehold treatment of the 10-acre parcel is proved for the company's mortgage security; earlier origin and later ownership remain unknown.
Evidence / Record: Companies House legal mortgage, company 01313998
What It Shows: Provides a concrete modern 10-acre freehold parcel in Shouldham to geolocate. The same charge register separately identifies other farm acreage, reinforcing that this was treated as a distinct asset.
Colts Connection: [Inference] Potentially relevant because Alfred George Pearce used Colts Hall as Companies House correspondence address, but 'the hall' is not identified and no Colts link is proved.
Current Interpretation: VERY HIGH MODERN PARCEL LEAD — must not be called Colts land until mapped/title-traced.
Next Decisive Document: Obtain charge/release filing if possible; historical HMLR title/index-map search; map 10 acres against Colts Hall/1633/1811/1843/HARE 5466.
2002 -> 2023 — A Pearce of Colts Hall applied in 2002 over land rear of Blackhorse Cottage to Newlands, Westgate Street; 2023 council material maps the allocated site east of 52–60 Westgate Street at 0.3ha with New Road/public-footpath context.
Date / Period: 2002 -> 2023
Physical Land / Estate Event: A Pearce of Colts Hall applied in 2002 over land rear of Blackhorse Cottage to Newlands, Westgate Street; 2023 council material maps the allocated site east of 52–60 Westgate Street at 0.3ha with New Road/public-footpath context.
Lordship / Title Event: No lordship event.
Rights Event: Planning history only; applicant identity and later development do not prove legal title.
Evidence / Record: West Norfolk 2/02/1587/O + 23/00056/F planning PDFs
What It Shows: Supplies modern geometry that can be overlaid with the historic four-tenements/Batchelors/Colts landscape and used to target HMLR searches.
Colts Connection: [Inference] Pearce/Colts Hall association makes this a practical localisation lead, not ownership evidence.
Current Interpretation: MODERN GEOMETRY BRIDGE — exact 2002/2023 overlap still to confirm.
Next Decisive Document: Retrieve both full red-line plans/ownership certificates; compare site geometry; HMLR SIM/register/plan; crosswalk 1811/tithe.
1884–1885 — OS Norfolk XLV.16 provides a second 25-inch Shouldham sheet close to the 1883 pound and after HARE 5466.
Date / Period: 1884–1885
Physical Land / Estate Event: OS Norfolk XLV.16 provides a second 25-inch Shouldham sheet close to the 1883 pound and after HARE 5466.
Lordship / Title Event: No lordship transfer shown.
Rights Event: No rights transfer shown.
Evidence / Record: OS Norfolk XLV.16, 1884/85
What It Shows: Corrects the map-crosswalk assumption: the Shouldham landscape is split across more than one 25-inch sheet, so microparcel continuity must be reconstructed across LVII.7 and XLV.16.
Colts Connection: Directly relevant to Shouldham geography; exact Colts-core placement still to plot.
Current Interpretation: CARTOGRAPHIC CORRECTION / BOUNDARY GATE — not severance evidence by itself.
Next Decisive Document: Overlay Colts Hall NGR + scheduled monument; compare XLV.16/LVII.7; then trace each parcel through tithe/valuation.
1910–1915 — Valuation Office ownership survey can be narrowed to East Anglia Peterborough (King's Lynn) District IR 127/8; Shouldham must be tested on both Norfolk LVII.7 and XLV.16.
Date / Period: 1910–1915
Physical Land / Estate Event: Valuation Office ownership survey can be narrowed to East Anglia Peterborough (King's Lynn) District IR 127/8; Shouldham must be tested on both Norfolk LVII.7 and XLV.16.
Lordship / Title Event: No lordship event.
Rights Event: Field books can state freehold/copyhold interest, owner/occupier, tenancy/rent, area and valuation.
Evidence / Record: The National Archives Valuation Office Survey guide
What It Shows: Creates the strongest immediate pre-1930 ownership crosswalk now identified and gives the exact workflow from OS sheet -> assessment number -> IR 58 field book.
Colts Connection: Direct search route for Colt's Hall / Colt's Farm; actual assessment(s) not yet retrieved.
Current Interpretation: CRITICAL PRE-1930 OWNERSHIP GATE — no owner yet proved.
Next Decisive Document: Find IR 127/8 plans for both sheet numbers; record assessment/income-tax parish; retrieve IR 58 field book(s).
16 Jun 1992 — Alfred G. Pearce (Farms) Ltd filed form 403b declaring a mortgage charge released/ceased.
Date / Period: 16 Jun 1992
Physical Land / Estate Event: Alfred G. Pearce (Farms) Ltd filed form 403b declaring a mortgage charge released/ceased.
Lordship / Title Event: No manorial-title event shown.
Rights Event: Potential release of charged property/security; exact affected charge/extent not visible in metadata.
Evidence / Record: Companies House filing history
What It Shows: Introduces a precise legal event between the 1985 10-acre mortgage and 2009 satisfaction that could explain a parcel release or charge restructuring.
Colts Connection: Possible relevance to the 10-acre 'near the hall' lead; connection not proved until the document identifies the charge/property.
Current Interpretation: VERY HIGH RELEASE-DOCUMENT TARGET — do not treat as 10-acre severance without the filing.
Next Decisive Document: Order/read 403b; identify charge number/property; then trace historic HMLR title/plan.
8 Jul 1506 -> 5 Jun 1512 — 1506 fine describes a Watlington manor package with 1 messuage, 200a land, 20a meadow, 40a pasture and 10a wood. Six years later SL26/6/CR/1 records multiple customary holding transfers at a general court of a Manor of Watlington. The exact 1512 holdings are not yet named.
Date / Period: 8 Jul 1506 -> 5 Jun 1512
Physical Land / Estate Event: 1506 fine describes a Watlington manor package with 1 messuage, 200a land, 20a meadow, 40a pasture and 10a wood. Six years later SL26/6/CR/1 records multiple customary holding transfers at a general court of a Manor of Watlington. The exact 1512 holdings are not yet named.
Lordship / Title Event: 1506 final concord acknowledges the manor/estate to Henry Wyatt, Richard Wyatt and Reynold Pegge, to Henry's heirs; the 1512 draft court's lord is not securely named in the surviving scan.
Rights Event: 1506 package includes 16s rent, one free fold and St Peter advowson. The 1512 court proves customary services, entry fines, fealty and admissions/seisin, but no secure free-fold or advowson reference has yet been read from it.
Evidence / Record: CP 25/1/170/197 no.106 + SL26/6/CR/1 + Steven Gunn (2016), ch.13
What It Shows: Creates a six-year chronological bridge between Wyatt's 1506 Watlington manor acquisition and a functioning Watlington customary court in 1512, but Pass 63 materially strengthens the competing-identity control. An official archival inventory identifies a Ramsey Abbey 'Watlington, manor' court baron/customary court roll in 1435-36, proving that a generic Watlington court style cannot itself identify a single manor stream. Separately, the Fincham compilation now links John Fyncham's pre-1506 estate/testament context (Shuldham Thorpe; Walyngton; Watlington; 'magistro Symeon Fyncham') to its later secondary statement that Simon was rector of Watlington with a Norwich will in 1512.
Colts Connection: UNPROVED. Neither the 1506 generic Watlington manor nor the 1512 generic Watlington court is yet internally tied to Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts.
Current Interpretation: IDENTITY / TENURE / ADVOWSON BRIDGE CANDIDATE — still unproved. [Inference] The Fyncham family/property material makes Simon a more coherent candidate for the St Peter vacancy test, while the Ramsey Abbey 1435-36 court makes manor-name matching less reliable. Neither development identifies the lord of SL26/6 or connects Wyatt's manor to Colts/Trussbutts.
Next Decisive Document: Priority 1: recover the Ramsey 1435-36 court roll modern shelfmark and inspect its lord/steward/tenant stream. Priority 2: recover John Fyncham's 1496 primary testament/IPM and Simon's 1512 Norwich probate register/folio. Priority 3: identify the first St Peter presentation after the candidate vacancy. Priority 4: recover HARE 1870-1 / 1875-6 and resolve SL26/6 names.
22 May 1506 -> 8 Jul 1506 — CP 25/1/170/197 no.102 records 3 messuages and 30 acres in Wallyngton' and Thorplond'. Only seven weeks later, no.106 records the Manor of Watlyngton' with its estate package, free fold and St Peter advowson.
Date / Period: 22 May 1506 -> 8 Jul 1506
Physical Land / Estate Event: CP 25/1/170/197 no.102 records 3 messuages and 30 acres in Wallyngton' and Thorplond'. Only seven weeks later, no.106 records the Manor of Watlyngton' with its estate package, free fold and St Peter advowson.
Lordship / Title Event: No.102 is a land concord in Wallington/Thorpland; no.106 is the separate Watlyngton manor concord to Henry Wyatt, Richard Wyatt and Reynold Pegge.
Rights Event: No.102 states no manor/advowson. No.106 expressly includes a free fold and the advowson of St Peter of Watlyngton.
Evidence / Record: CP 25/1/170/197 nos.102 and 106 — direct full-text Feet of Fines abstracts; linked AALT endpoints IMG_0155 and IMG_0159
What It Shows: This is a very strong same-series legal place-name control. Contemporary clerks/transcribers distinguish Wallyngton' + Thorplond' from Watlyngton' rather than treating them as interchangeable forms. It materially protects the Wyatt/1512 investigation from the historic Wallington-cum-Thorpland conflation.
Colts Connection: Directly relevant to identity control only. It does not identify the Wyatt manor as Colts/Trussbutts.
Current Interpretation: PLACE-NAME / TITLE-STREAM CONTROL — NOT A SEVERANCE EVENT.
Next Decisive Document: Keep no.102 and no.106 paired in every Tudor identity test. Next: resolve 1512 lord/steward/tenants and the St Peter presentation stream; recover HARE 1870–1 / 1875–6.
14 Hen VI (1435-1436) — Public Records Commission inventory identifies 'Watlington, manor. Roll of court baron and customary court, anno 14 Hen. VI' within Ramsey Abbey's Norfolk manorial records.
Date / Period: 14 Hen VI (1435-1436)
Physical Land / Estate Event: Public Records Commission inventory identifies 'Watlington, manor. Roll of court baron and customary court, anno 14 Hen. VI' within Ramsey Abbey's Norfolk manorial records.
Lordship / Title Event: Ramsey Abbey collection context only; underlying lord/steward and title clauses are not visible in the inventory entry.
Rights Event: A functioning court baron/customary court is evidenced by the archival inventory; no St Peter advowson clause is stated in this specific entry.
Evidence / Record: Public Records Commission digitised inventory — search-indexed official archival finding aid
What It Shows: Demonstrates an earlier generic Watlington manorial court stream associated in the archival inventory with Ramsey Abbey. This materially strengthens the multiple-Watlington control and prevents the 1512 SL26/6 court from being assigned to Wyatt/Colts solely because it is styled Watlington.
Colts Connection: No bridge to Colts/Trussbutts, Wyatt, Gawsell or Shuldham is proved.
Current Interpretation: VERY HIGH IDENTITY-CONTROL EVENT — NOT A SEVERANCE FINDING.
Next Decisive Document: Recover the modern archival reference and underlying 1435-36 roll; extract lord/steward/tenants/holdings; compare names and institutional style with SL26/6, the 1506 Wyatt fine, St Peter advowson evidence and later HARE material.
1540-1566 -> 1786-1909 — Searchable catalogue metadata names 'Manor of Watlington-with-West Dereham. Court (Norfolk)' and a court-roll series beginning in 1540, resuming 1786-1909.
Date / Period: 1540-1566 -> 1786-1909
Physical Land / Estate Event: Searchable catalogue metadata names 'Manor of Watlington-with-West Dereham. Court (Norfolk)' and a court-roll series beginning in 1540, resuming 1786-1909.
Lordship / Title Event: [Inference] Possible post-Dissolution West Dereham Abbey Watlington stream; first roll/lord not yet inspected.
Rights Event: Court-roll existence only; rights/incidents must be extracted from originals.
Evidence / Record: WeRelate catalogue reproduction + FamilySearch catalog ID 438436; FHL film 1472612 item 10 and 1702188 item 14; WCT-DIG-0058 antiquarian court-roll extracts
What It Shows: The exact catalogue/film route is now resolved. The 1540 series start still aligns with the reported first William Butts court in 32 Hen VIII for the former West Dereham Abbey manor in Watlington, but [Inference] the identity remains unproved until the opening roll is read.
Colts Connection: No documentary bridge to Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts or SL26/6 yet.
Current Interpretation: CRITICAL MANOR-IDENTITY BRANCH — FILM/CATALOG ROUTE RESOLVED; NOT A SEVERANCE FINDING.
Next Decisive Document: Use FamilySearch catalog 438436 / FHL films 1472612 item 10 and 1702188 item 14 to locate the first 1540 roll; transcribe manor heading, lord/capacity, steward, tenants and holdings; obtain modern NRO shelfmark and compare with SL26/6.
1622-1785 — TNA official accession metadata identifies 'Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall manor' court book, ACC 2002/145.
Date / Period: 1622-1785
Physical Land / Estate Event: TNA official accession metadata identifies 'Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall manor' court book, ACC 2002/145.
Lordship / Title Event: Distinct/collateral Trusbut manor stream unless expressly bridged.
Rights Event: Court book may record fines, rents, admissions, heriots, wastes and other incidents; not yet inspected.
Evidence / Record: TNA Norfolk Record Office 2002 accessions / manorial digest
What It Shows: Provides a long court-book comparator in the exact Runcton Holme/Tottenhall landscape and may help distinguish repeated Trusbut manor names.
Colts Connection: No proof this is Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts. Vision of Britain identifies Tittleshall as a manor within Runcton Holme.
Current Interpretation: COLLATERAL TRUSBUT IDENTITY CONTROL — NOT TARGET-MANOR SEVERANCE.
Next Decisive Document: Resolve NRO item-level reference; inspect first/last courts and tenant/property indexes; compare exact manor title with 1597 Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes wording.
29 Jan 1330 — Thomas Bardolf IPM separately lists a manor in Watlington and Longham held by Geoffrey Bryseyard for 1 knight's fee, and another 1-fee Watlington/Foston/Wallington/Setchey/Hardwick block held by a different tenant group.
Date / Period: 29 Jan 1330
Physical Land / Estate Event: Thomas Bardolf IPM separately lists a manor in Watlington and Longham held by Geoffrey Bryseyard for 1 knight's fee, and another 1-fee Watlington/Foston/Wallington/Setchey/Hardwick block held by a different tenant group.
Lordship / Title Event: Superior tenure under the honour of Wormegay; no Colts/Trusbut holder named in these specific 1330 blocks.
Rights Event: Both fee blocks render Castelward and Waytefee; these are superior-honour burdens, not proof of one subordinate manor.
Evidence / Record: Thomas Bardolf IPM/calendar transcription
What It Shows: Pushes the multiple-Watlington structure back to 1330. [Inference] The later 1427 Trusbut fee cannot be assigned to the Bryseyard block without a tenant/descent bridge.
Colts Connection: No direct bridge to Colts/Trussbutts yet.
Current Interpretation: MEDIEVAL MULTIPLE-FEE IDENTITY CONTROL — NOT A SEVERANCE EVENT.
Next Decisive Document: Trace Geoffrey Bryseyard and the separate Watlington fee block through 14th-century deeds/IPMs; compare 1390/1403/1427 tenant names and localities.
28 Sep 1610 -> 1611 — Scholarship cites Coke's acquisition of Longham Priors from Futter on 28 Sep 1610; Tawney lists 1611 Holkham/Tittleshall Book 62 records 'Longham and Watlington' and 'Watlington and Priors'.
Date / Period: 28 Sep 1610 -> 1611
Physical Land / Estate Event: Scholarship cites Coke's acquisition of Longham Priors from Futter on 28 Sep 1610; Tawney lists 1611 Holkham/Tittleshall Book 62 records 'Longham and Watlington' and 'Watlington and Priors'.
Lordship / Title Event: Coke/Holkham Longham-Priors estate stream.
Rights Event: Rights/incidents not extracted from the underlying Holkham manuscripts.
Evidence / Record: Holkham Estate Catalogue citation via Coke scholarship + Tawney source list
What It Shows: [Inference] Strongly supports a distinct Longham-Watlington-Priors complex and provides a plausible forward continuation for the older Watlington-and-Longham manor stream.
Colts Connection: Does not prove identity with or severance from Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts.
Current Interpretation: COMPETING LONGHAM/PRIORS TITLE STREAM — EXCLUSION CONTROL, NOT TARGET SEVERANCE.
Next Decisive Document: Recover Holkham vol.5 doc.650 and Tittleshall Book 62; extract manor title, tenants, foldcourse, boundaries and any earlier title recitals.
4 May 1427 -> 19 Nov 1434 / proved 12 Jul 1435 -> Richard succession unresolved -> Geoffrey separately established at Islington -> later Thomas returns to Watlington -> 1522/1535 -> 1567 — 1427: Robert Kervyle holds a Watlington quarter-fee. 1434/35: Robert directly gives his Manor of Watlington to eldest son Richard, his heirs and assigns. The same will separately orders Geoffrey to be enfeoffed in fee simple in Robert's messuage and named lands at Islington. Gurney's later Watlington pedigr...
Date / Period: 4 May 1427 -> 19 Nov 1434 / proved 12 Jul 1435 -> Richard succession unresolved -> Geoffrey separately established at Islington -> later Thomas returns to Watlington -> 1522/1535 -> 1567
Physical Land / Estate Event: 1427: Robert Kervyle holds a Watlington quarter-fee. 1434/35: Robert directly gives his Manor of Watlington to eldest son Richard, his heirs and assigns. The same will separately orders Geoffrey to be enfeoffed in fee simple in Robert's messuage and named lands at Islington. Gurney's later Watlington pedigree marks Richard 'obiit s.p.', but Pass 71 corrects the source attribution: Gurney's explicit reliance on Islington Court Rolls is stated for his corrected Wiggenhall St Mary's pedigree, not expressly for Richard's Watlington entry. Geoffrey's son Thomas is later styled of Watlington.
Lordship / Title Event: Robert Kervyle; Richard Kervyle (direct manor devisee; d.s.p. only secondary/unresolved-source statement); Geoffrey Kervyle (direct separate Islington devisee); Thomas Kervile of Watlington; later Tudor Kerviles.
Rights Event: Direct Watlington manor to Richard; separate Islington messuage plus named lands to Geoffrey in fee simple; Kreykyscroft separate remainder structure; later capital messuage/foldcourse estate at Watlington.
Evidence / Record: Register Surflete will; Gurney Watlington pedigree; Harl.1552 visitation; British Library Add Roll 67553-67556 later Islington account-roll route; E-CIPM 22-799; NCC wills; CP40/1253.
What It Shows: Pass 71 separates two questions that Pass 70 blurred: (1) Geoffrey's Islington estate is directly proved by Robert's will; (2) Richard's death without issue is stated in Gurney's Watlington pedigree, but the underlying source is unidentified. The Islington Court Rolls are therefore relevant to Geoffrey's branch but cannot presently be cited as proof of Richard's d.s.p. status.
Colts Connection: No primary Richard death/heirship instrument or manor transfer has been found. No proof links the Kervile manor to the generic 1435-36 court, Wyatt, SL26/6, West Dereham, Gawsells or Colts.
Current Interpretation: DIRECT KERVILE MANOR STREAM — SOURCE CONTROL CORRECTED; RICHARD D.S.P. REMAINS SECONDARY, MANOR SUCCESSION UNPROVED.
Next Decisive Document: Priority order corrected: recover 1435-36 Watlington court roll and primary Richard death/heirship/deeds first; separately trace Geoffrey's named Islington fee-simple holdings and locate older Islington rolls; use BL 1496-1506 compotus as later branch evidence, not as Richard proof.
1340 -> 1361 — 1340: two acres in Thorplond had been acquired by the prioress of Crabhous from Adam son of John de Watlyngton by royal licence. 1361: John de Watlyngton and Edmund Kervyle are jointly named among alienors of a substantial west-Norfolk property package to Blackborough Priory.
Date / Period: 1340 -> 1361
Physical Land / Estate Event: 1340: two acres in Thorplond had been acquired by the prioress of Crabhous from Adam son of John de Watlyngton by royal licence. 1361: John de Watlyngton and Edmund Kervyle are jointly named among alienors of a substantial west-Norfolk property package to Blackborough Priory.
Lordship / Title Event: Adam de Watlyngton; John de Watlyngton; Edmund Kervyle; prioress/convent of Crabhous/Blackborough.
Rights Event: Two acres in Thorpland; separate 1361 messuages/land/meadow/pasture in Clenchwarton, Tilney, Wiggenhall, South Lynn, Middleton and West Lynn. No Watlington manor is named.
Evidence / Record: Inquisitions Miscellaneous 1340; Close Roll 26 Oct 1340; Patent Roll 16 Nov 1361 / C 66 membrane 11
What It Shows: [Inference] These records make a de Watlyngton-to-Kervyle social/property network in west Norfolk chronologically plausible before Robert's 1434 manor, and they give concrete individuals to test against the will's earlier de Watlington provenance.
Colts Connection: They do not prove that the 1340/1361 John is John son of William son of Thomas de Wathlington; Thorpland is not Watlington; the 1361 lands are not the Watlington manor.
Current Interpretation: PRE-KERVILE PROVENANCE CONTROL — DIRECT NETWORK EVIDENCE, NOT TITLE DESCENT.
Next Decisive Document: Trace Adam/John de Watlyngton through Norfolk fines/deeds; recover original C 54/C 66 images; search for William/Thomas de Watlyngton parentage; compare dates with the 1434 provenance formula.
20 Edw III (1346-47) -> 1373/1386 coheir-family Trussbut crossover -> 1425/1427 -> 1435-36 court test -> 1443-44 -> 1451 -> Thomas Shuldham — John Bartholomew held this Manor of Watlington in 20 Edw III. His daughters included Margaret, who married John Glemsford and carried the manor to him, and Agnes, who married William de Shuldham. That same William/Agnes couple dealt in 1373/1386 with Thomas son of Nicholas Trussbut over land in Shuldham. The active possession line continued through Marg...
Date / Period: 20 Edw III (1346-47) -> 1373/1386 coheir-family Trussbut crossover -> 1425/1427 -> 1435-36 court test -> 1443-44 -> 1451 -> Thomas Shuldham
Physical Land / Estate Event: John Bartholomew held this Manor of Watlington in 20 Edw III. His daughters included Margaret, who married John Glemsford and carried the manor to him, and Agnes, who married William de Shuldham. That same William/Agnes couple dealt in 1373/1386 with Thomas son of Nicholas Trussbut over land in Shuldham. The active possession line continued through Margaret -> Katherine Hawdekyn, with patronage in 1425/1427, then Katherine Curteys livery in 1443-44 and presentation 1451. Thomas Shuldham later appears as the next coheir/title claimant through the Agnes-Shuldham branch.
Lordship / Title Event: John Bartholomew; Margaret Bartholomew/Glemsford; Agnes Bartholomew/Shuldham; William de Shuldham; Thomas son Nicholas Trussbut; Katherine Hawdekyn; Katherine Curteys; John Shuldham; Thomas Shuldham.
Rights Event: Manor/advowson title plus a separate parcel of land in Shuldham transferred/released to Trussbut. The Shuldham parcel is not identified as manor land.
Evidence / Record: Norfolk Archaeology VI pp.300-303, medieval pedigree/title entry and deed notes from Stow Bardolph muniments.
What It Shows: Pass 73 materially strengthens the network: the 1373/1386 Trussbut transaction is inside a coheir family branch of the same Watlington title pedigree. [Inference] This raises the possibility of parcel-level interaction between Watlington-coheir family property and Trussbut holdings, but no Watlington parcel is identified in the deeds.
Colts Connection: Margaret is expressly said to have carried the manor to Glemsford; Agnes's coheir descent does not prove the Shuldham parcel formed part of that manor. The 1435-36 court identity remains unresolved.
Current Interpretation: CRITICAL TITLE-FAMILY/TRUSSBUT CROSSOVER — FAMILY BRIDGE PROVED, WATLINGTON PARCEL/MANOR MERGER NOT PROVED.
Next Decisive Document: Recover original 1373/1386 deeds/bounds and modern HARE refs; recover Curteys livery; recover John Shuldham 1425 probate and Thomas succession instrument; compare against 1435-36 court.
1373 -> 26 Jul 1386 — William de Shuldham, husband of Agnes daughter of John Bartholomew in the Watlington-manor coheir pedigree, secured a parcel of land in Shuldham to Thomas son of Nicholas Trussbut in 1373; Agnes, William's widow, released the land to Trussbut in 1386.
Date / Period: 1373 -> 26 Jul 1386
Physical Land / Estate Event: William de Shuldham, husband of Agnes daughter of John Bartholomew in the Watlington-manor coheir pedigree, secured a parcel of land in Shuldham to Thomas son of Nicholas Trussbut in 1373; Agnes, William's widow, released the land to Trussbut in 1386.
Lordship / Title Event: William de Shuldham; Agnes Bartholomew/Shuldham; Thomas son of Nicholas Trussbut.
Rights Event: Parcel of land in Shuldham/Shouldham; exact acreage, bounds, tenure and source of Agnes's potential claim unrecovered.
Evidence / Record: Norfolk Archaeology VI p.303 citing Stow Bardolph deeds; pedigree on preceding pages supplies Agnes's Bartholomew coheir identity.
What It Shows: This is now direct proof that a Trussbut land transaction involved a branch of the exact family entitled as coheirs in the competing Manor of Watlington pedigree.
Colts Connection: Still no statement that the transferred parcel was in Watlington, belonged to the Watlington manor, or was Colts/Trussbutts. No manor merger shown.
Current Interpretation: DIRECT TITLE-FAMILY/TRUSSBUT CROSSOVER — PARCEL IDENTITY UNRESOLVED.
Next Decisive Document: Recover originals and determine parcel bounds/title source; test whether the land appears in later Trussbut/Colt or Shuldham estate schedules.
17 Ric II (1393-94) -> 4 Jul 1403 — Secondary Fincham pedigree evidence cites a 17 Ric II marriage settlement for Alicia Fyncham and Laurence Trusbutt of Shouldham. Ten years later a royal IPM fee schedule directly records Lawrence Trussebute holding a separate Watlington quarter-fee and a larger one-fee block across Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, Shouldham Thorpe and Langham; the same schedule separately records John de Fyncham holding a Foston/Shouldham Thorpe quarter-fee and a Fincham/We...
Date / Period: 17 Ric II (1393-94) -> 4 Jul 1403
Physical Land / Estate Event: Secondary Fincham pedigree evidence cites a 17 Ric II marriage settlement for Alicia Fyncham and Laurence Trusbutt of Shouldham. Ten years later a royal IPM fee schedule directly records Lawrence Trussebute holding a separate Watlington quarter-fee and a larger one-fee block across Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, Shouldham Thorpe and Langham; the same schedule separately records John de Fyncham holding a Foston/Shouldham Thorpe quarter-fee and a Fincham/West Dereham/Roxham/Fordham fee.
Lordship / Title Event: Alicia Fyncham; Laurence/Lawrence Trusbutt/Trussebute; John de Fyncham.
Rights Event: Trusbut: Watlington 1/4 fee plus one-fee multi-place block. Fyncham: Foston/Shouldham Thorpe 1/4 fee plus Fincham/West Dereham/Roxham/Fordham fee. Marriage property schedule unknown.
Evidence / Record: Fyncham compilation citing Marr. Sett. 17 Ric II; E-CIPM 18-793 / TNA C 137/37/39 mm.9-10; E 149/81/3 m.3.
What It Shows: Pass 74 places a Fyncham-Trusbut marriage immediately before primary proof of Laurence's Watlington tenure and alongside a separate Fyncham Shouldham-Thorpe fee. [Inference] The marriage may be relevant to local property consolidation, but there is no evidence yet that Alicia brought the Watlington fee or that the Fyncham fee became Trusbut property.
Colts Connection: Original marriage settlement missing. The 1403 fee schedule expressly distinguishes the fee entries and gives no acquisition mechanism.
Current Interpretation: DIRECT TRUSBUT WATLINGTON TENURE + TIGHT FINCHAM MARRIAGE NETWORK — TITLE MECHANISM UNPROVED.
Next Decisive Document: Recover 17 Ric II marriage settlement; trace Laurence's 1403 full fee and quarter-fee backward/forward; trace John Fyncham's Shouldham-Thorpe quarter-fee separately; compare later Trusbut/Shouldham deeds.
1467 -> 5 Oct 1474 -> 1494/1496 — Thomas Shuldham's 1467 testamentary summary grouped Watlington, Shouldham and Burnham Deepdale as life interests for widow Margaret. By 5 Oct 1474 a charter transcription shows Margaret, now widow of Thomas Shuldham senior, receiving a life annuity of 8 marks 6s.8d. charged on the manor of Depdale called Holkhammes from John Fyncham and feoffees. Fincham material says John purchased Burnham Deepdale in 1474; his 1494 will names his manor of Depdale and the of...
Date / Period: 1467 -> 5 Oct 1474 -> 1494/1496
Physical Land / Estate Event: Thomas Shuldham's 1467 testamentary summary grouped Watlington, Shouldham and Burnham Deepdale as life interests for widow Margaret. By 5 Oct 1474 a charter transcription shows Margaret, now widow of Thomas Shuldham senior, receiving a life annuity of 8 marks 6s.8d. charged on the manor of Depdale called Holkhammes from John Fyncham and feoffees. Fincham material says John purchased Burnham Deepdale in 1474; his 1494 will names his manor of Depdale and the official 1496 IPM confirms a manor in Depdale and Brankastir.
Lordship / Title Event: Thomas Shuldham senior; Margaret Shuldham; John Fyncham and feoffees.
Rights Event: Burnham Deepdale/Depdale manor; Margaret's prior life interest; 1474 annual rent/annuity with distraint. Watlington and Shouldham disposition after this event not shown.
Evidence / Record: Norfolk Archaeology VI Shuldham will summary; 1474 charter derivative transcription; Fincham compilation; NRO Hare 2026 193 x 5 official IPM metadata.
What It Shows: [Inference] This is the strongest current indication that Thomas Shuldham's grouped three-manor estate was being fragmented by 1474: Deepdale appears under Fyncham control while Margaret's economic interest is preserved as an annuity. It may represent purchase plus commutation/protection of her life estate.
Colts Connection: The operative 1474 purchase/conveyance is missing. Do not state Margaret sold Deepdale, released her entire life estate, or that Watlington/Shouldham passed with Deepdale.
Current Interpretation: PROBABLE DEEPDALE SEVERANCE/RESTRUCTURING FROM SHULDHAM GROUP — OPERATIVE DEED NOT YET RECOVERED.
Next Decisive Document: Recover original 1474 annuity charter and purchase deed; compare Thomas Shuldham 1467 will; determine what happened separately to Watlington and Shouldham after Deepdale left the group.
4 Jul 1403 -> by Easter 1418 -> 4 May 1427 — 1403: Lawrence Trussebute and others hold one knight's fee across Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, Shouldham Thorpe and Langham, plus a separate Watlington quarter-fee. Modern archival scholarship places Lawrence's death by Easter 1418. 1427: Thomas Trusbut and parceners hold one knight's fee across Watlington, Tottenhill, Garbodesthorp, Setchey and ?Longham.
Date / Period: 4 Jul 1403 -> by Easter 1418 -> 4 May 1427
Physical Land / Estate Event: 1403: Lawrence Trussebute and others hold one knight's fee across Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, Shouldham Thorpe and Langham, plus a separate Watlington quarter-fee. Modern archival scholarship places Lawrence's death by Easter 1418. 1427: Thomas Trusbut and parceners hold one knight's fee across Watlington, Tottenhill, Garbodesthorp, Setchey and ?Longham.
Lordship / Title Event: Lawrence Trussebute; Thomas Trusbut and parceners.
Rights Event: One-fee Trusbut block with exact Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey overlap; probable Shouldham Thorpe/Garbodesthorp alias continuity; fifth place unresolved. Lawrence also had a separate Watlington quarter-fee in 1403.
Evidence / Record: E-CIPM 18-793 / C 137/37/39 mm.9-10 / E 149/81/3 m.3; Maddock archival synthesis; E-CIPM 22-799 / C 139/30/56 mm.13,15.
What It Shows: [Inference] Same fee quantity, same Trusbut surname and highly overlapping locality-set strongly indicate continuity of the feudal fee block from Lawrence's generation to Thomas's by 1427. The transition window is now approximately 1418-1427.
Colts Connection: No source yet states Thomas's relationship to Lawrence, the legal transfer, or that 1403 Langham = 1427 ?Longham. No automatic identity with later Colts/Trusbuttes manor.
Current Interpretation: VERY HIGH TRUSBUT CONTINUITY ANCHOR — FEE BLOCK STRONGLY CONTINUOUS, HOLDER DESCENT STILL UNPROVED.
Next Decisive Document: Find Lawrence probate/death instrument; Thomas parentage/heirship; inspect HARE 2683-4 and HARE 2493; resolve Garbodesthorp and Langham/Longham; push fee block forward to 1451/Colt transition.
1 Hen V (1413-14) -> by Easter 1418 -> 1597 comparison — Christ's College MR7 item 53(1) describes a 60-year Bromehill Priory lease to Laurence ?Trussebut [Gressebut] of all lands, tenements, rents and tithes in Runcton Holme, annual rent 20s, with catalogue total about 4a 3r 20p. Lawrence is dead by Easter 1418. In 1597 the Colt estate sale expressly includes Colt lands/tenements in Runcton Holme alongside Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes.
Date / Period: 1 Hen V (1413-14) -> by Easter 1418 -> 1597 comparison
Physical Land / Estate Event: Christ's College MR7 item 53(1) describes a 60-year Bromehill Priory lease to Laurence ?Trussebut [Gressebut] of all lands, tenements, rents and tithes in Runcton Holme, annual rent 20s, with catalogue total about 4a 3r 20p. Lawrence is dead by Easter 1418. In 1597 the Colt estate sale expressly includes Colt lands/tenements in Runcton Holme alongside Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes.
Lordship / Title Event: Laurence ?Trussebut; Bromehill Priory; much later George Colt/Thomas Shouldham estate parties.
Rights Event: 1413-14 leased Runcton property; exact parcels unnamed/partially illegible in catalogue. 1597 Colt Runcton-Holme lands are separately documented but no parcel equation is proved.
Evidence / Record: Christ's College Muniments Inventory MR7 item 53(1); HARE 2402/2403 1597 catalogue evidence.
What It Shows: [Inference] Runcton Holme is now a direct locality-continuity marker on both the early Lawrence-era Trusbut side and the later Colt estate side. This materially strengthens the route to test physical continuity, especially if the original lease yields parcel names.
Colts Connection: Catalogue surname is queried; lease is not a manor; 1413 parcels are not yet shown to be the 1597 Colt parcels. Runcton also contained distinct manorial interests.
Current Interpretation: DIRECT EARLY RUNCTON-HOLME LAND BRIDGE — LOCALITY CONTINUITY STRONG, PARCEL CONTINUITY UNPROVED.
Next Decisive Document: Obtain original MR7 item 53(1); inspect MR4,6 Runcton rolls/rental; compare parcel/tenant names with HARE 2493, 1597 HARE2402 and later estate maps.
Trusbut heiress -> Thomas Colt -> Joan d. probable 4 Aug 1473 -> IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 -> John heir/ward — Visitation proves Jane/Joan as Norfolk Trusbut heiress married Thomas Colt and John as son/heir. Copinger gives probable death 4 Aug 1473 and exact IPM reference 15 Edw IV no.34. Pass 78 adds Lysons' use of that same IPM for Joan's seisin of Clayhall, Barking, descending to John, showing the IPM trail covers substantive estate property beyond the Cavendish narrative.
Date / Period: Trusbut heiress -> Thomas Colt -> Joan d. probable 4 Aug 1473 -> IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 -> John heir/ward
Physical Land / Estate Event: Visitation proves Jane/Joan as Norfolk Trusbut heiress married Thomas Colt and John as son/heir. Copinger gives probable death 4 Aug 1473 and exact IPM reference 15 Edw IV no.34. Pass 78 adds Lysons' use of that same IPM for Joan's seisin of Clayhall, Barking, descending to John, showing the IPM trail covers substantive estate property beyond the Cavendish narrative.
Lordship / Title Event: Jane/Joan Trusbut; Thomas Colt; Sir William Parr; John Colt.
Rights Event: Known inherited/succession contexts now include Cavendish and Clayhall. Exact Norfolk Trusbut estate remains missing.
Evidence / Record: Harvey Visitation; DNB; Copinger; Lysons.
What It Shows: The legal chain is increasingly concrete. The original IPM could now plausibly resolve whether John inherited Norfolk Trusbut property alongside Suffolk/Essex holdings.
Colts Connection: Clayhall origin is unproved; do not label it Trusbut property. Original IPM/livery not yet recovered.
Current Interpretation: VERY HIGH HEIRESS/IPM BRIDGE — ACTUAL SECOND MANOR NOW IDENTIFIED, NORFOLK SCHEDULE STILL MISSING.
Next Decisive Document: Original IPM/C140 -> all county returns -> 5 Nov 1485 livery -> compare Norfolk entries to 1403/1427 fee and 1597 Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes.
13 Edw IV death -> 15 Edw IV IPM -> 1 Hen VII wardship / reported 5 Nov 1485 livery — Joan dies, John succeeds as heir in known estate contexts, and John is later described as Parr's ward in 1 Hen VII. Modern BP2003 material reports livery 5 Nov 1485. Pass 79 adds official TNA method: post-IPM livery and wardship records can often be found in Patent Rolls C66; this should now be searched before treating Fine Rolls as the only route.
Date / Period: 13 Edw IV death -> 15 Edw IV IPM -> 1 Hen VII wardship / reported 5 Nov 1485 livery
Physical Land / Estate Event: Joan dies, John succeeds as heir in known estate contexts, and John is later described as Parr's ward in 1 Hen VII. Modern BP2003 material reports livery 5 Nov 1485. Pass 79 adds official TNA method: post-IPM livery and wardship records can often be found in Patent Rolls C66; this should now be searched before treating Fine Rolls as the only route.
Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut Colt Parr; Sir William Parr; John Colt.
Rights Event: Known inherited estate hooks now include Cavendish, Clayhall and Suffolks; property released by livery remains unknown.
Evidence / Record: Copinger; Lysons; Robinson; BP2003 derivative; TNA IPM research guide.
What It Shows: [Inference] The known estate names should materially improve Patent Roll searching for John Colt around 5 Nov 1485.
Colts Connection: No primary livery entry found. Date remains secondary. Do not infer Norfolk land without record text.
Current Interpretation: LIVERY SEARCH ROUTE CORRECTED — PRIORITISE C66 PATENT ROLLS.
Next Decisive Document: Search CPR Henry VII 1485-1494 and C66 around 5 Nov 1485 using John Colt/Colte + Clayhall/Cavendish/Suffolks; then county escheator returns.
4 Aug 1473 [reconstructed] -> 15 Edw IV IPM -> John Colt — Copinger's death formula resolves to 4 Aug 1473 and says Cavendish passed to son/heir John. Lysons independently cites the same 15 Edw IV no.34 escheat/IPM for Joan dying seised of the Manor of Clayhall in Barking and its descent to John Colte. Thus the Joan IPM trail now demonstrably touches at least a Suffolk succession context and an Essex manor.
Date / Period: 4 Aug 1473 [reconstructed] -> 15 Edw IV IPM -> John Colt
Physical Land / Estate Event: Copinger's death formula resolves to 4 Aug 1473 and says Cavendish passed to son/heir John. Lysons independently cites the same 15 Edw IV no.34 escheat/IPM for Joan dying seised of the Manor of Clayhall in Barking and its descent to John Colte. Thus the Joan IPM trail now demonstrably touches at least a Suffolk succession context and an Essex manor.
Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut Colt Parr; Thomas Colt; Sir William Parr; John Colt/Colte.
Rights Event: Known estate points: Cavendish/Colt's Hall succession context; Manor of Clayhall, Barking. Norfolk Trusbut estate still unknown.
Evidence / Record: Copinger, Manors of Suffolk; Lysons, Environs of London; DNB chronology control.
What It Shows: The same IPM number appearing independently for different estates sharply increases the likelihood that the original return contains a broader multi-property schedule. [Inference] This makes a county-by-county search of the IPM more promising than livery searching alone.
Colts Connection: Clayhall is not proved Trusbut-derived. Copinger may cite the IPM for heir/death rather than every Cavendish detail. Original IPM still controls.
Current Interpretation: MULTI-ESTATE JOAN IPM TRAIL — FIRST NON-CAVENDISH MANOR RECOVERED; NORFOLK CONTENT UNKNOWN.
Next Decisive Document: Locate C 140 modern shelfmark for 15 Edw IV no.34; search county histories for additional properties; trace Clayhall pre-Joan title; then compare any Norfolk entries with Trusbut fee geography.
Joan d. probable 4 Aug 1473 -> IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 -> three known estate contexts — The exact Joan IPM reference is now independently tied to three property contexts: Cavendish/Colt's Hall succession (Copinger), Clayhall in Barking descending to John Colte (Lysons), and the Manor of Suffolks in Enfield inherited by John Colt (Robinson). Robinson's family narrative is corrupted, but his property paragraph explicitly cites the same Esch. 15 Edw IV no.34.
Date / Period: Joan d. probable 4 Aug 1473 -> IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 -> three known estate contexts
Physical Land / Estate Event: The exact Joan IPM reference is now independently tied to three property contexts: Cavendish/Colt's Hall succession (Copinger), Clayhall in Barking descending to John Colte (Lysons), and the Manor of Suffolks in Enfield inherited by John Colt (Robinson). Robinson's family narrative is corrupted, but his property paragraph explicitly cites the same Esch. 15 Edw IV no.34.
Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut Colt Parr; John Colt; Thomas Colt; Sir William Parr.
Rights Event: Known contexts: Cavendish/Colt's Hall, Suffolk; Clayhall, Barking, Essex; Suffolks, Enfield, Middlesex. Norfolk holdings remain unknown.
Evidence / Record: Copinger; Lysons; Robinson; all independently citing 15 Edw IV no.34. TNA method points to C140/E149 and Calendarium IV.
What It Shows: Three separate estate contexts using the same numbered IPM make a multi-county/multi-property return highly plausible. [Inference] A full C140/E149 extraction has a realistic chance of exposing additional Norfolk estates if Joan held them.
Colts Connection: Robinson misstates marriage order/husband/date. No Norfolk holding is yet found. The original return controls.
Current Interpretation: THREE-ESTATE JOAN IPM RECONSTRUCTION — ORIGINAL C140/E149 NOW CRITICAL.
Next Decisive Document: Read Calendarium IV 15 Edw IV no.34 -> map to C140 modern file/item -> check E149 counterpart -> extract all counties/properties -> then C66 livery for John Colt.
15 Edw IV inquisition — Rogers NORFOLK wording visually verified; exact manor names missing — Pass 81 visually inspected the original printed Rogers pages. The page itself states that Johanna's fifteenth-year inquisition contained an extensive list of possessions in Berkshire, Middlesex, Norfolk, Essex and Suffolk. The printed footnote itself says 'Cal. Inquis. post mortem, Richard II., p.72', proving the source defect is not OCR.
Date / Period: 15 Edw IV inquisition — Rogers NORFOLK wording visually verified; exact manor names missing
Physical Land / Estate Event: Pass 81 visually inspected the original printed Rogers pages. The page itself states that Johanna's fifteenth-year inquisition contained an extensive list of possessions in Berkshire, Middlesex, Norfolk, Essex and Suffolk. The printed footnote itself says 'Cal. Inquis. post mortem, Richard II., p.72', proving the source defect is not OCR.
Lordship / Title Event: Joan/Johanna Trusbut Colt Parr; John Colt.
Rights Event: Norfolk property is explicitly reported by Rogers at county level; no exact Norfolk manor/lands extracted. Known other estate contexts remain Cavendish, Clayhall and Suffolks.
Evidence / Record: Rogers 1879 direct scanned page; Copinger; Lysons; Robinson; TNA C140/E149/Calendarium route.
What It Shows: The evidential status is clearer: the Norfolk assertion is certainly Rogers' printed statement, while its printed citation is demonstrably anomalous. This strengthens the statement-as-source but not the unidentified underlying medieval record.
Colts Connection: No exact Norfolk place. Do not repair the Richard-II citation by assumption. Rogers' separate Materials Henry VII p127 pointer has now been identified as Thomas Colt/Roger Thorpe litigation, not John Colt livery.
Current Interpretation: NORFOLK STATEMENT VISUALLY VERIFIED — UNDERLYING IPM LAND LIST STILL THE DECISIVE TARGET.
Next Decisive Document: Calendarium 15 Edw IV no.34 -> C140/E149 -> all Norfolk places; keep John Colt livery search in C66/Patent Rolls.
Late 15th-century heiress seat — source ladder: NORFOLK -> SHINGHAM / HOLME / RUNCTON HOLME — The 1561 Suffolk visitation gives only a Norfolk Trusbut heiress. Gough's much earlier monumental account names father John Trusbut of Shingham. A separate modern pedigree says John 'of Holme, Norfolk'. BP2003-derived sites expand the seat to Runcton Holme.
Date / Period: Late 15th-century heiress seat — source ladder: NORFOLK -> SHINGHAM / HOLME / RUNCTON HOLME
Physical Land / Estate Event: The 1561 Suffolk visitation gives only a Norfolk Trusbut heiress. Gough's much earlier monumental account names father John Trusbut of Shingham. A separate modern pedigree says John 'of Holme, Norfolk'. BP2003-derived sites expand the seat to Runcton Holme.
Lordship / Title Event: John Trusbut; Joan/Jane Trusbut; Thomas Colt; Sir William Parr.
Rights Event: Competing seat descriptions: generic Norfolk; Shingham; Holme; Runcton Holme. No primary estate schedule yet attaches Joan to a particular one.
Evidence / Record: Harvey Suffolk Visitation 1561; Gough; Powys-Lybbe; BP2003-derived ThePeerage.
What It Shows: Pass 81 shows the modern evidence is not one uniform Runcton tradition. 'Holme' exists as a less specific intermediate form, making editorial/source expansion a live possibility. Gough's Shingham remains the earliest specific seat found.
Colts Connection: No claim-specific source is exposed for Powys-Lybbe's Holme wording; Gough is antiquarian; BP2003 derivative is modern. Do not merge places or select a seat.
Current Interpretation: SEAT CONFLICT REFINED — GENERIC NORFOLK / SHINGHAM / HOLME / RUNCTON HOLME ALL KEPT DISTINCT.
Next Decisive Document: Joan Norfolk IPM return; John/Thomas Trusbut wills; Shingham records; Runcton MR4/6; Harley MS1177 and other visitation copies.
15 Edw IV no.34 -> VCH source-specific C 140/52/13 citation -> five known estate contexts; 28 Jan 1478 Bodleian writ — Joan's same numbered IPM is now explicitly tied in published record-based sources to Cavendish/Colt's Hall, Clayhall, Suffolks, Boxstead Manor and 'Peytones'/Peyton Hall. VCH additionally supplies C 140/52/13 for the Clayhall/Joan passage. Bodleian MS. Ch. Norfolk 339 [corrected Pass 83] preserves a later 28 Jan 1478 commission/writ to take an inquisition of Joan's lands.
Date / Period: 15 Edw IV no.34 -> VCH source-specific C 140/52/13 citation -> five known estate contexts; 28 Jan 1478 Bodleian writ
Physical Land / Estate Event: Joan's same numbered IPM is now explicitly tied in published record-based sources to Cavendish/Colt's Hall, Clayhall, Suffolks, Boxstead Manor and 'Peytones'/Peyton Hall. VCH additionally supplies C 140/52/13 for the Clayhall/Joan passage. Bodleian MS. Ch. Norfolk 339 [corrected Pass 83] preserves a later 28 Jan 1478 commission/writ to take an inquisition of Joan's lands.
Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut Colt Parr; Sir William Parr; John Colt/Colte; Thomas Colt.
Rights Event: Inheritance/IPM packet across Suffolk, Essex and Middlesex; Rogers separately states the fifteenth-year inquisition also included Norfolk, Berkshire and the other counties. Exact Norfolk places remain unknown.
Evidence / Record: VCH Essex/Barking; Copinger County of Suffolk; Copinger Manors of Suffolk; existing Copinger/Lysons/Robinson/Rogers; Bodleian Charters Catalogue.
What It Shows: The old-reference bottleneck is materially reduced: a precise modern Chancery target now exists and two further Suffolk manor contexts are tied to the same IPM number. The original C140/E149 content still controls.
Colts Connection: Very high heiress/title-identity relevance. No new Norfolk/Watlington parcel is claimed from Boxstead or Peyton; the Bodleian collection label is not treated as land-location proof.
Current Interpretation: MAJOR IPM RECONSTRUCTION UPGRADE — C 140/52 IS SAFE MODERN PIECE; /13 REMAINS UNRESOLVED; FIVE KNOWN ESTATE CONTEXTS; NORFOLK PLACE LIST STILL MISSING.
Next Decisive Document: Obtain/read all C 140/52 constituent returns/items for Joan (including source-cited /13, status unresolved) -> compare Calendarium 15 Edw IV no.34 -> E149/E152 counterparts -> extract every Norfolk property -> inspect MS. Ch. Norfolk 339 -> then search John Colt C66 livery.
15 Edw IV assignment -> 28 Jan 17 Edw IV enforcement writ (Ch./MS. Ch. Norfolk 339) — Pass 83 corrects the Bodleian target to Ch./MS. Ch. Norfolk 339. Edward IV's writ to the sheriff of London and Middlesex names John Tymperley junior as escheator of Norfolk and Suffolk and says he had been assigned in 15 Edw IV to take Joan's inquisition. VCH Roydon independently fixes the Chancery retrieval form as C 140/52, no.34; Pass-82 /13 is now treated as an unresolved sub-item/citation form rather th...
Date / Period: 15 Edw IV assignment -> 28 Jan 17 Edw IV enforcement writ (Ch./MS. Ch. Norfolk 339)
Physical Land / Estate Event: Pass 83 corrects the Bodleian target to Ch./MS. Ch. Norfolk 339. Edward IV's writ to the sheriff of London and Middlesex names John Tymperley junior as escheator of Norfolk and Suffolk and says he had been assigned in 15 Edw IV to take Joan's inquisition. VCH Roydon independently fixes the Chancery retrieval form as C 140/52, no.34; Pass-82 /13 is now treated as an unresolved sub-item/citation form rather than the final whole-packet reference.
Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut-Colt-Parr; Sir William Parr; John Tymperley junior; John Colt/Colte.
Rights Event: No Norfolk manor is named by the writ. The new value is procedural: Joan's post-mortem inquiry was explicitly assigned to the joint Norfolk/Suffolk escheator.
Evidence / Record: Bodleian Calendar of Charters and Rolls (1878), Ch.339; current Bodleian catalogue MS. Ch. Norfolk 339; VCH Essex Roydon; CIPM editorial two-county procedure control.
What It Shows: [Inference] A joint Norfolk/Suffolk assignment is compatible with separate county inquisitions and uneven survival; this materially strengthens the search for a missing Norfolk return but does not prove that such a return survives.
Colts Connection: No Watlington/Shouldham/Shingham/Holme/Runcton Holme parcel is named. C 140/52 sub-item numbering remains unresolved; do not promote /13 or /34 as a modern item number without TNA confirmation.
Current Interpretation: PRIMARY-DERIVED NORFOLK/SUFFOLK IPM PROCESS NOW PROVED — EXACT NORFOLK LAND LIST STILL MISSING.
Next Decisive Document: Order/retrieve MS. Ch. Norfolk 339; request TNA C 140/52 material for Joan wife of William Parre / old 15 Edw IV no.34; search E149 by Joan + John Tymperley; extract county returns separately.
Edward-IV Joan IPM recovery strategy — Pass 84 archive-survival expansion — No new physical-land event is asserted. Pass 84 concerns survival/retrieval of the missing Norfolk county return and its evidence trail.
Date / Period: Edward-IV Joan IPM recovery strategy — Pass 84 archive-survival expansion
Physical Land / Estate Event: No new physical-land event is asserted. Pass 84 concerns survival/retrieval of the missing Norfolk county return and its evidence trail.
Lordship / Title Event: No change to the Joan -> John Colt inheritance conclusion. C 140/52 remains the safe Chancery piece-level target; exact constituent item is unresolved.
Rights Event: No new manorial right is asserted.
Evidence / Record: CIPM New Series XXVI editorial conventions; TNA IPM research guide; Mapping the Medieval Countryside E-CIPM 25-400/401 and reference table.
What It Shows: The retrieval ladder must now include E 152 enrolments, E 153 residual escheators' files, and E 136/E 357 account material in addition to C 140 and E 149. A concrete 1440 Norfolk/Suffolk packet shows one joint writ producing two county inquisitions while only the Suffolk return has a listed E149 duplicate.
Colts Connection: Indirect but very high identity significance: a negative E149 Norfolk search would not prove that no Norfolk return existed or survives elsewhere.
Current Interpretation: ARCHIVAL-SURVIVAL CONTROL UPGRADE — SEARCH EACH RECORD CLASS AND COUNTY RETURN INDEPENDENTLY; DO NOT EQUATE MISSING E149 DUPLICATE WITH MISSING NORFOLK IPM.
Next Decisive Document: C 140/52 all constituents -> E 149 -> E 152 -> E 153 -> E 136/E 357; use Joan Parre + John Tymperley junior + Norfolk/Suffolk + 15 Edw IV.
15 Edw IV no.34 -> [Inference] leading exact modern item C 140/52/34 + early archive-index routes — Pass 85 adds no physical-land transfer. The gain is source control: CIPM XXV explicitly shows that an old Calendarium item number is retained as the final number in the modern C-series reference (16 Hen VI no.35 -> C 139/86/35). With Joan independently fixed to C 140/52, no.34, [Inference] C 140/52/34 is now the leading exact item. Separate early inventories at Trinity College Oxford MSS 61–62 ...
Date / Period: 15 Edw IV no.34 -> [Inference] leading exact modern item C 140/52/34 + early archive-index routes
Physical Land / Estate Event: Pass 85 adds no physical-land transfer. The gain is source control: CIPM XXV explicitly shows that an old Calendarium item number is retained as the final number in the modern C-series reference (16 Hen VI no.35 -> C 139/86/35). With Joan independently fixed to C 140/52, no.34, [Inference] C 140/52/34 is now the leading exact item. Separate early inventories at Trinity College Oxford MSS 61–62 and Bodleian Rawlinson B.231 add independent archive-index routes.
Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut-Colt-Parr; Sir William Parr; John Colt; John Tymperley junior only as existing target identifiers — no new person.
Rights Event: No new Norfolk property name. Existing five named non-Norfolk estate contexts remain unchanged; exact Norfolk return remains missing.
Evidence / Record: CIPM New Series XXV editorial introduction; VCH Roydon/Barking; Mapping the Medieval Countryside Chancery-archive history.
What It Shows: The modern item target is materially narrowed and the search now includes pre-modern archive inventories plus E 501/15–18. This improves retrieval precision without asserting any new severance or ownership event.
Colts Connection: Very high title-identity/recovery relevance; no direct modern parcel consequence until the Norfolk land schedule is recovered.
Current Interpretation: SOURCE-CONTROL UPGRADE — C 140/52/34 LEADING EXACT MAPPING [INFERENCE]; /13 CONFLICT RETAINED; EARLY INVENTORIES ADDED.
Next Decisive Document: Check/request C 140/52/34 and ask TNA to resolve /13 -> E 501/15–18 -> Trinity MSS 61–62 -> Rawlinson B.231 -> then E149/E152/E153/E136/E357 as needed.
1427 Trusbut fee -> 1451 Thomas Trussbut will -> John/William -> Jane heiress -> Thomas Colt — 1427 primary-derived IPM places Thomas Trusbut and parceners on a one-fee Watlington/Tottenhill/Garbodesthorp/Setchey/?Longham block. Parkin's 1451 will account then gives Thomas's Tittleshall lordship plus lands/foldcourses in Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey and adjacent places to son John, with Shouldham/Marham lands to William. Parkin's Shouldham descent says William died s.p., so the manor came to...
Date / Period: 1427 Trusbut fee -> 1451 Thomas Trussbut will -> John/William -> Jane heiress -> Thomas Colt
Physical Land / Estate Event: 1427 primary-derived IPM places Thomas Trusbut and parceners on a one-fee Watlington/Tottenhill/Garbodesthorp/Setchey/?Longham block. Parkin's 1451 will account then gives Thomas's Tittleshall lordship plus lands/foldcourses in Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey and adjacent places to son John, with Shouldham/Marham lands to William. Parkin's Shouldham descent says William died s.p., so the manor came to Jane, daughter/heir of elder brother John, who married Thomas Colt.
Lordship / Title Event: Thomas Trusbut; John Trusbut; William Trusbut; Jane/Joan Trusbut; Thomas Colt; John Colt.
Rights Event: Watlington; Tottenhill; Setchey; Garbodesthorp/Shouldham-Thorpe context; Tittleshall/Holme; Shouldham; Thorpland; Fincham.
Evidence / Record: E-CIPM 22-799; Parkin/Blomefield vol. VII; Historic England List Entry 1020446; probate target Register Aleyn fol.163.
What It Shows: [Inference] The exact 1427 fee parcels are not proved identical parcel-for-parcel with the 1451 testamentary estate, but the same holder plus overlapping Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey geography and the explicit Thomas->John/Jane->Colt succession materially closes the medieval transmission route.
Colts Connection: Very high title-identity significance; no modern parcel survival conclusion by itself.
Current Interpretation: MEDIEVAL TRUSBUT -> COLT TITLE/HEIRESS BRIDGE CLOSED AT PRIMARY-DERIVED LEVEL; ORIGINAL WILL STILL REQUIRED FOR MANUSCRIPT-LEVEL PROOF.
Next Decisive Document: Retrieve Aleyn fol.163 -> compare exact will wording with 1427 fee -> then use 1597 HARE 2402 premises to crosswalk surviving Tudor estate geography.
Joan 15 Edw IV no.34 — supposed Norfolk return downgraded / non-blocking — Rogers' printed statement that no.34 included Norfolk is retained, but Walter Rye's dedicated Norfolk inquisition index includes real 15 Edw IV entries no.33/no.63 and does not expose no.34, Parr/Parre, Colt or Trusbut.
Date / Period: Joan 15 Edw IV no.34 — supposed Norfolk return downgraded / non-blocking
Physical Land / Estate Event: Rogers' printed statement that no.34 included Norfolk is retained, but Walter Rye's dedicated Norfolk inquisition index includes real 15 Edw IV entries no.33/no.63 and does not expose no.34, Parr/Parre, Colt or Trusbut.
Lordship / Title Event: No new person; Joan/Parr/Colt names are source-control targets only.
Rights Event: No Norfolk parcel is now inferred from Joan no.34.
Evidence / Record: Rogers 1879; Walter Rye, Norfolk Records vol. II (1892); C140/VCH citation controls.
What It Shows: [Inference] The evidence now leans against treating Joan no.34 as a Norfolk county return. The direct Trusbut->Colt inheritance is independently evidenced through Parkin/Historic England, so the Joan-IPM Norfolk theory is no longer required.
Colts Connection: No modern parcel consequence.
Current Interpretation: FALSE-LEAD CONTROL — MISSING JOAN NORFOLK RETURN NO LONGER A REQUIRED LINK; C140 RETAINED FOR SOURCE CLEANUP ONLY.
Next Decisive Document: Check actual C140 item only to resolve /13 versus /34 and Rogers' error; do not keep the title chain open pending a hypothetical Norfolk return.
7 Jun 1930 -> 18 Mar 2024 current-title control — Historic England places the modern Shouldham Village Hall on the eastern end of an approximately 87m x 25m enclosure in the field corresponding to the greater part of the >9-acre Batchelors close, later Further Homestall and within early-19C Colt's Farm. A Village Hall Trust Declaration is dated 7 Jun 1930.
Date / Period: 7 Jun 1930 -> 18 Mar 2024 current-title control
Physical Land / Estate Event: Historic England places the modern Shouldham Village Hall on the eastern end of an approximately 87m x 25m enclosure in the field corresponding to the greater part of the >9-acre Batchelors close, later Further Homestall and within early-19C Colt's Farm. A Village Hall Trust Declaration is dated 7 Jun 1930.
Lordship / Title Event: No Watlington-Colts lordship transfer is stated in the Village Hall public records. The trust event occurs about four months after the 12 Feb 1930 Humphreys->Edleston lordship conveyance, but no connection between the two instruments is proved.
Rights Event: The 1930 declaration may concern land tenure/charitable use, but full terms are unread. Current Charity Commission data says the Trust owns/leases no land/property; 2024 Parish Council minutes show the Council sought the Governance Deed and Land Registry record to understand land ownership/lease.
Evidence / Record: Historic England NHLE 1020446 + Charity Commission 304061 + Shouldham Parish Council minutes 18 Mar 2024 + NRO PD 356/129 locator
What It Shows: First precise twentieth-century legal-instrument candidate attached to a physically identified historic Colts fragment. Modern public records still require the actual deed and HMLR record to explain the legal estate.
Colts Connection: Direct to Batchelors/Further Homestall eastern fragment; not evidence for the whole close.
Current Interpretation: [Inference] POTENTIAL VALID SEVERANCE / LEASE / TRUST EVENT, NOT YET PROVED. If the 1930 deed contains an operative grant/lease from the then physical-estate owner, it may close this fragment. If governance-only, ownership must be traced elsewhere. No ownerless or stolen-land finding.
Next Decisive Document: Full 7 Jun 1930 declaration/governance deed + NRO PD 356/129 + HMLR current/historic register and title plan.
Capital messuage / Colt's close / Colt's Hall core
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Capital messuage / Colt's close / Colt's Hall core
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: HARE 2495 (1633) via Historic England
Historic Description / Extent: Capital messuage/manor house + close called Colt's; 6 acres
Later Continuity Evidence: Early-19C estate map; 1843 Homestall east/southeast of Colt's Hall Pass 102 adds a pre-tithe electoral control: 'Lemmon Charles, Shouldham' appears in the 1835 West Norfolk poll-book index. Pass 107 contextualises the preceding landscape transformation: the 1794 Shouldham + Garboiesthorpe enclosure is listed at 5,570 acres in Cooke's Arthur Young-derived table.
Present Physical Survival: Colt's Hall survives; scheduled earthworks survive around it
Current Registered Owner: Not verified from HMLR
Known Severance Evidence: No operative severance deed yet recovered; later HARE estate administration must be tested
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Yes, if still a legally/reputed part/member of Watlington Colts and within Humphreys's title in 1930; no if already distinctly conveyed away
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: TOP RECOVERY CANDIDATE — exact 1843 machine-map target now calculated (L12/R61436/C85456). Pass 95 adds an exact current parcel-facing address lead: Colts Hall, 21 The Green, Shouldham, PE33 0BY, with a 20 Nov 2025 conservation-area tree-works planning entry. [Inference] Hare-owner / Lemmon-occupier remains the strongest current 1843 model, but neither the 2025 planning entry nor the directory word 'farmer' proves freehold ownership. Actual tithe owner/occupier and HMLR title remain unresolved. Pass 99 targeted searches again exposed only Historic England's Homestall/Further Homestall summary and the parish planning aggregate page; neither the exact tithe owner/occupier/plot data nor the Colts Hall application reference surfaced. Pass 101 adds only a secondary modern administrative address/building control: Colts Hall appears at 21 The Green in public council-tax/EPC indexes (Band F; EPC G/potential E, score 15). This does not alter the unresolved owner/title position. Pass 102: the 1835 entry strengthens Charles Lemmon's pre-1843 Shouldham continuity only; it does not identify Colts Hall or the qualifying property. Pass 103 corrects the modern planning retrieval route: West Norfolk uses TREECA for Shouldham conservation-area tree notifications, and ordinary delegated reports exclude this application type. Pass 104 removes an evidential shortcut: the post-1840 Charles Lemmon household identity is not secure enough to infer the 1843 proprietor/occupier from later directories or the Downham property study. Pass 105 materially narrows the archive route: the Norfolk TNA map/apportionment pair is now known to be IR 30/23/[item] ↔ IR 29/23/[same item]; only Shouldham's final item and parcel data remain missing. Pass 106 removes the final-reference discovery bottleneck: Shouldham can be searched directly in the tithe collection, with the TNA item exposed by the returned record/map. The 5,570-acre figure is deliberately excluded from Colts-core acreage calculations because it is the combined enclosure entry.
Next Decisive Evidence: Immediate modern test: retrieve the full 20 Nov 2025 Borough Council Colts Hall conservation-area tree-work file by exact address/date -> record the actual application reference, applicant and plan/any ownership-related declarations actually present -> use exact address 'Colts Hall, 21 The Green, Shouldham, PE33 0BY' plus Eastgate Street form for HMLR title/index-map search. In parallel: NCC tithe tile L12/R61436/C85456 (+ adjacent tiles) -> exact Shouldham plot numbers -> TNA IR 30/IR 29 or NRO apportionment. HARE 5466 / Hare-Hoff public searching is frozen pending original bundle images. Pass 99 negative control: do not use 2/TPO/00673 for Colts Hall, and do not guess the Shouldham IR 29/IR 30 reference from other parish numbering. Pass 101 hard limit: do not use council-tax/EPC data as a title substitute; HMLR and the actual 2025 application remain decisive. Retrieve the actual 1835 qualification line/page alongside the 1843 tithe image/apportionment. Direct TREECA/tree-notification register retrieval is now the required planning step; exact 2025 reference still must be recovered rather than inferred. Actual tithe plot/apportionment remains mandatory; Lemmon family reconstruction is supporting evidence only. PASS 105: TNA county reference is now fixed as IR 30/23/[SHOULDHAM ITEM] map ↔ IR 29/23/[same item] apportionment. Recover the final item, then cross-read against NCC L12/R61436/C85456. PASS 106: bypass prior item-number discovery by searching the tithe collection directly with County=Norfolk / Parish=Shouldham and no personal name; read the returned transcript/original/map and capture the TNA piece/sub-piece from the result.
Four tenements with yards east side of Village Green south of Colts
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Four tenements with yards east side of Village Green south of Colts
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: HARE 2495 (1633) via Historic England
Historic Description / Extent: Four tenements with yards
Later Continuity Evidence: Need 1811/1843 parcel-number crosswalk; may now be fragmented village plots
Present Physical Survival: Modern plots/buildings likely occupy this strip, but exact historic-to-modern boundaries unverified
Current Registered Owner: Not verified from HMLR
Known Severance Evidence: Unknown; likely parcel-by-parcel conveyances over centuries but not yet documented
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Only any parcel never separately severed could have followed 1930 manor conveyance
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: HIGH-VALUE RESIDUAL-PARCEL / FRAGMENTATION AUDIT — only a fragment never separately transferred and proved through the current title chain can remain a recovery candidate
Next Decisive Evidence: NCC tithe tile L12/R61436/C85456 (+ adjacent tiles) -> read Shouldham plot numbers -> TNA IR 30/IR 29 via TheGenealogist OR NRO apportionment; NCC Shouldham tithe map plot number -> TNA IR 30/IR 29 via TheGenealogist OR NRO apportionment owner/occupier/field/acreage; Full HARE 2495 + HARE 6832 + tithe + modern cadastral/title-plan overlay PASS 105: TNA county reference is now fixed as IR 30/23/[SHOULDHAM ITEM] map ↔ IR 29/23/[same item] apportionment. Recover the final item, then cross-read against NCC L12/R61436/C85456. PASS 106: bypass prior item-number discovery by searching the tithe collection directly with County=Norfolk / Parish=Shouldham and no personal name; read the returned transcript/original/map and capture the TNA piece/sub-piece from the result.
Alder carr east of the four tenements
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Alder carr east of the four tenements
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: HARE 2495 (1633) via Historic England
Historic Description / Extent: Nearly 7 acres / c.2.8 ha
Later Continuity Evidence: Historic England locates the low-lying area and adjoining plantation corresponding to the carr
Present Physical Survival: Landscape feature/low ground survives within scheduled-area geography; exact title parcel unverified
Current Registered Owner: Not verified from HMLR
Known Severance Evidence: No specific conveyance found
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Potential only if no later severance and still reputed/member of manor in 1930
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: RECOVERY CANDIDATE — historic parcel clear; devolution after 1633 unclear
Next Decisive Evidence: NCC tithe tile L12/R61436/C85456 (+ adjacent tiles) -> read Shouldham plot numbers -> TNA IR 30/IR 29 via TheGenealogist OR NRO apportionment; NCC Shouldham tithe map plot number -> TNA IR 30/IR 29 via TheGenealogist OR NRO apportionment owner/occupier/field/acreage; 1811 map; 1843 tithe; 1849 terrier; HARE 5466; HMLR PASS 105: TNA county reference is now fixed as IR 30/23/[SHOULDHAM ITEM] map ↔ IR 29/23/[same item] apportionment. Recover the final item, then cross-read against NCC L12/R61436/C85456. PASS 106: bypass prior item-number discovery by searching the tithe collection directly with County=Norfolk / Parish=Shouldham and no personal name; read the returned transcript/original/map and capture the TNA piece/sub-piece from the result.
Appletons wooded close
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Appletons wooded close
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: HARE 2495 (1633) via Historic England
Historic Description / Extent: 5 acres / c.2 ha east of alder carr
Later Continuity Evidence: Historic England correlates surviving terraces/ground to Appletons
Present Physical Survival: Archaeological landform survives; current proprietary parcel unverified
Current Registered Owner: Not verified from HMLR
Known Severance Evidence: No specific conveyance found
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Potential only if continuous/reputed manor membership survived to 1930
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: RECOVERY CANDIDATE — physical correlation strong; title chain missing
Next Decisive Evidence: NCC tithe tile L12/R61436/C85456 (+ adjacent tiles) -> read Shouldham plot numbers -> TNA IR 30/IR 29 via TheGenealogist OR NRO apportionment; NCC Shouldham tithe map plot number -> TNA IR 30/IR 29 via TheGenealogist OR NRO apportionment owner/occupier/field/acreage; HARE 6832 + tithe + HARE 5370 + HMLR PASS 105: TNA county reference is now fixed as IR 30/23/[SHOULDHAM ITEM] map ↔ IR 29/23/[same item] apportionment. Recover the final item, then cross-read against NCC L12/R61436/C85456. PASS 106: bypass prior item-number discovery by searching the tithe collection directly with County=Norfolk / Parish=Shouldham and no personal name; read the returned transcript/original/map and capture the TNA piece/sub-piece from the result.
Batchelors / Further Homestall
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Batchelors / Further Homestall
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: HARE 2495 (1633); 1843 tithe via Historic England; Charity Commission 304061; Shouldham Parish Council minutes 18 Mar 2024; exact NRO locator PD 356/129.
Historic Description / Extent: Just over 9 acres north of Beerway; later 'Further Homestall'. Historic England says the first surviving rectangular enclosure is about 87m E-W by 25m and its eastern end is occupied by the modern village hall, outside the scheduling.
Later Continuity Evidence: Early-19C Colt's Farm included the scheduled area; 1843 preserves the field identity as Further Homestall. A Declaration of Trust for Shouldham Village Hall is dated 7 Jun 1930, creating a precisely dated legal-document event for the hall fragment. The 1835 poll-book index now places Charles Lemmon at Shouldham before the tithe, complementing the existing parish-register farmer sequence and 1845 Colts Hall directory evidence. Pass 104: early Charles Lemmon + Mary farmer evidence is consistent with the Discover Downham identification of Mary Winearls as first wife, but later 1850s Mary baptisms conflict with that study's Hannah-by-1840 second-wife chronology. Pass 107 adds a pre-1811 scale control of 5,570 acres for the combined 1794 Shouldham/Garboiesthorpe enclosure.
Present Physical Survival: Historic earthwork/toft area survives partly as protected pasture; the village hall occupies the eastern end of one identifiable former enclosure. The Charity Commission currently says the Village Hall Trust does not own and/or lease land/property.
Current Registered Owner: Current registered proprietor/title not yet verified. In Mar 2024 the Parish Council itself resolved to obtain the Land Registry record while investigating the background of land ownership and lease.
Known Severance Evidence: A 7 Jun 1930 trust instrument is now proved to exist, but its public metadata does NOT show whether it conveyed, gifted, leased or merely governed the hall site. It is the leading candidate severance/tenure instrument for the eastern Batchelors fragment, not yet proof of severance.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] This is now the strongest parcel-specific 'show me the severance instrument' test. If the 1930 deed validly transferred/leased the hall footprint from the then Colts/Hare physical-estate owner, that fragment can be closed accordingly. If it did not transfer the legal estate, the modern title/lessor chain must explain who owns it. No conclusion about the remainder of Batchelors follows from the hall fragment.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found; no ownerless/unclaimed status proved.
Current Audit Status: TOP SEVERANCE-INSTRUMENT TEST — historic Colts parcel geometry + exact 1930 trust date + current public ownership/lease uncertainty. The existence of the trust does not itself prove disposal. PASS 102: continuity is stronger, but ownership remains unproved because the poll qualification/property and tithe owner/occupier are unread. IDENTITY CAUTION: do not treat the full 1822–1859 baptism run as proven one-household continuity until the Mary/Hannah chronology is resolved. PASS 105: the owner/occupier question is now an exact paired-record retrieval problem rather than an unidentified TNA-series problem. PASS 106: actual owner/occupier evidence is now one direct parish-result read away; no person-name hypothesis is required to search. CONTEXT ONLY: this does not establish the extent or ownership of Colt's Farm within the enclosed landscape.
Next Decisive Evidence: Obtain full 7 Jun 1930 Trust/Governance Deed -> NRO PD 356/129 -> 2024-referenced HMLR register/title plan -> identify grantor/donor/lessor and legal estate -> overlay against HE 87m x 25m enclosure + 1843 tithe -> determine whether only hall footprint or any larger Batchelors area was validly severed. 1835 poll qualification -> 1843 tithe owner/occupier -> 1849 HARE 5370 -> HARE 5466 remains the clean sequence. Primary 1841/1851 census + marriage/death/original-register check can clean the Lemmon identity control, but it cannot replace tithe/HARE parcel evidence. PASS 105: TNA county reference is now fixed as IR 30/23/[SHOULDHAM ITEM] map ↔ IR 29/23/[same item] apportionment. Recover the final item, then cross-read against NCC L12/R61436/C85456. PASS 106: bypass prior item-number discovery by searching the tithe collection directly with County=Norfolk / Parish=Shouldham and no personal name; read the returned transcript/original/map and capture the TNA piece/sub-piece from the result.
Whole Colt's Farm / Homestall estate unit
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Whole Colt's Farm / Homestall estate unit
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Early-19C HARE estate map + 1843 tithe; HARE 5466 later names 'Colts Farm in Shouldham'. Pass 92 adds a same-period 1875 role split: Kelly names Hare/Stephen Allen as principal landowners, Charles Lemmon as farmer, and the Court Directory gives Lemmon's exact address as Colts Hall.
Historic Description / Extent: Farm unit incorporating the scheduled former manorial core by early 19C; HARE 5466 names the whole farm, but its acreage/field schedule remains unread.
Later Continuity Evidence: HARE 5466 still lists Colts Farm in Hare estate schedules in 1871/post-1874. The 1875 Court Directory directly places Charles Lemmon at Colts Hall; the parish directory separately categorises him as farmer while Hare/Allen are principal landowners. 25-inch OS LVII.7/XLV.16 and later 1912 Kelly continue the Colts Hall/Farm identity.
Present Physical Survival: Colt's Hall/farm landscape survives physically; current farm-title extent unknown.
Current Registered Owner: Not verified from HMLR.
Known Severance Evidence: HARE 5466 is now a substantially stronger indicator that physical Colts Farm remained in the Hare estate administrative/landholding stream after the reported 1869 lordship transition, because the same-period 1875 directory independently separates the principal-landowner class from Lemmon's farming role at Colts Hall.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Strongest current model: around 1875 Charles Lemmon operated/occupied Colts Hall/Farm while the physical farm remained in the Hare estate landholding/administrative sphere. If the reported 1869 lordship transfer is independently confirmed, this becomes strong chronological evidence that physical Colts Farm and the lordship/title had separated. Exact legal freehold still requires HARE 5466/tithe/valuation/deeds.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: MOST IMPORTANT SEVERANCE QUESTION — SAME-PERIOD EVIDENCE NOW STRONGLY SUPPORTS LANDLORD/OPERATOR SEPARATION AROUND 1875, BUT EXACT FREEHOLD WORDING IS STILL UNREAD.
Next Decisive Evidence: Priority now: full HARE 5466 Colts Farm sheet -> tenant/rent/acreage/proprietary wording; 1843 tithe owner/occupier; HARE 5370; 1910 valuation; then 1929/1930 deeds and HMLR.
Commons / wastes / Shouldham Village Green control
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Commons / wastes / Shouldham Village Green control
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Colts tenements bordered east side of the Green in 1633; no source yet says the Green itself was Colts land
Historic Description / Extent: Village Green VG.168; ownership unclaimed in 1977
Later Continuity Evidence: Commons Commissioner registered Shouldham Parish Council after no claimant or ownership evidence emerged
Present Physical Survival: Village Green survives and is publicly managed
Current Registered Owner: Shouldham Parish Council by 1977 statutory registration decision; current register should be checked
Known Severance Evidence: Statutory ownership resolution in 1977; not shown to derive from Colts
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No Colts basis currently proved
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None; 1977 process is evidence of lost ownership memory, not theft
Current Audit Status: LOCAL FORGOTTEN-OWNERSHIP CONTROL — EXCLUDE FROM COLTS CLAIM unless earlier proprietary evidence is found
Next Decisive Evidence: VG168 register map/file; 1749/1794 enclosure material; HARE 2495/6832 overlay
Protected pasture / scheduled medieval settlement immediately behind Colt's Hall
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Protected pasture / scheduled medieval settlement immediately behind Colt's Hall
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Historic England links the scheduled area to the 1633 Colt's/Trussbutt's estate and says early-19C Colt's Farm included the whole scheduled settlement area
Historic Description / Extent: Surviving tofts, enclosures, hollow way and field earthworks within the former Colt's Farm/Homestall landscape
Later Continuity Evidence: Norfolk Heritage Explorer says the earthworks remain beneath untouched pasture and have been under a protection agreement since 2001
Present Physical Survival: Strong physical survival; exact modern cadastral boundary/proprietor still unverified
Current Registered Owner: Not verified from HMLR
Known Severance Evidence: No deed severing this surviving pasture from Colt's Farm/manor has yet been recovered; protection agreement may identify a modern owner/occupier
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Potentially, but only the portion still legally/reputedly part of the manor in 1930 could have passed; unchanged landscape is not proof of unchanged title
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: TOP MODERN PARCEL-TITLE TARGET — overlay scheduled boundary against HMLR INSPIRE, then obtain register/plan and 1910 valuation entry
Colts Hall / Colts Hall Farm farmstead title footprint
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Colts Hall / Colts Hall Farm farmstead title footprint
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Historic Colts capital-messuage/farm core; surviving Hall at NGR TF6784408887; 1843 Homestall; 1912 Kelly; 20 Nov 2025 conservation-area lime-tree planning entry at Colts Hall, 21 The Green; Borough Council listed-buildings schedule.
Historic Description / Extent: Modern Hall is c.1830; adjacent listed barn uses re-used medieval/C16 fabric; exact relationship to 1633 building footprint must not be assumed. Official address controls now include both 'Colts Hall, 21 The Green, PE33 0BY' and Council-listed '21 Colts Hall' under Eastgate Street.
Later Continuity Evidence: Walter Lemmon is at Colts Hall / Colts Hall Farm in 1912. PASS 98 restores the correct 2025 event: T1/T2 lime-tree conservation-area works at Colts Hall. Application 2/TPO/00673 / T6 Grey Poplar is King George Playing Field and is not a Colts Hall title lead. Pass 101 adds independent secondary administrative-property presence at the same exact postal address: Council Tax Band F and an EPC-index house entry (G; potential E; score 15). Pass 102 places Charles Lemmon at Shouldham in the 1835 electoral index, ten years before White's direct 1845 Colts Hall association.
Present Physical Survival: Hall and barn survive; precise modern property identity is now well controlled across NGR, Eastgate Street and 21 The Green address forms. The current exact postal/building identity is therefore independently reproduced across planning, listed-building and public property-data sources.
Current Registered Owner: Not verified from HMLR. Exact Colts Hall planning application reference/full file not yet recovered; applicant/proprietor unknown. Council-tax/EPC classification does not establish the current freehold proprietor.
Known Severance Evidence: No modern freehold conveyance chain retrieved; building survival/occupation does not identify proprietor. The TPO application is an ownership-clue route only, not a severance instrument.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] The standard tree-work form can identify whether the applicant claims to own the tree(s) and, if not, may name the tree owner. This can narrow the current proprietor search but cannot by itself prove the whole Colts Hall freehold or historic manor-land extent.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: HIGH-PRIORITY FARMSTEAD CROSSWALK — EXACT TPO REF + DUAL OFFICIAL ADDRESS CONTROL; CURRENT HMLR TITLE STILL MISSING. PASS 101: administrative-property cross-check strengthens address identity only; legal title remains open. PASS 102: this improves chronological continuity but still does not establish the freehold owner of the farmstead. Pass 103 corrects the modern planning retrieval route: West Norfolk uses TREECA for Shouldham conservation-area tree notifications, and ordinary delegated reports exclude this application type. Pass 104: the Lemmon family chronology is explicitly quarantined from title inference because the wife-name sequence after 1840 is internally unresolved.
Next Decisive Evidence: Retrieve the full Borough Council Colts Hall conservation-area tree-work file by address/date -> identify its true reference, applicant, site/tree plan and any ownership-related declaration actually present -> search HMLR using both 21 The Green and Eastgate Street/21 Colts Hall -> obtain register/title plan -> overlay against HE NGR, scheduled boundary, 1843 Homestall and historic maps. Use the address controls only to retrieve the Borough file/HMLR result; do not infer owner or boundary from Band/EPC data. Direct TREECA/tree-notification register retrieval is now the required planning step; exact 2025 reference still must be recovered rather than inferred. Continue to use 1845 'Lemmon Charles — Colts Hall' as direct address/occupation evidence only; resolve household identity separately. PASS 105: TNA county reference is now fixed as IR 30/23/[SHOULDHAM ITEM] map ↔ IR 29/23/[same item] apportionment. Recover the final item, then cross-read against NCC L12/R61436/C85456. PASS 106: bypass prior item-number discovery by searching the tithe collection directly with County=Norfolk / Parish=Shouldham and no personal name; read the returned transcript/original/map and capture the TNA piece/sub-piece from the result.
1597 outlying Colt estate package — Runcton Holme / Thorpland / Tottenhill / Setchey / Wiggenhalls / Terrington / Marshland
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1597 outlying Colt estate package — Runcton Holme / Thorpland / Tottenhill / Setchey / Wiggenhalls / Terrington / Marshland
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: HARE 2402 official NRO catalogue description says George Colt's 17 Mar 1597 bargain-and-sale included associated messuages, lands and tenements in these places alongside the expressly named Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes manor
Historic Description / Extent: No acreages or individual parcel names recovered from the catalogue abstract
Later Continuity Evidence: Later parcel continuity not yet reconstructed; several places underwent enclosure, estate exchange and registration changes
Present Physical Survival: Unknown parcel-by-parcel
Current Registered Owner: Not identified
Known Severance Evidence: Unknown; the full deed and later conveyances are needed to see which parcels were sold independently
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Potential only if a parcel remained legally/reputedly part/member of the manor or otherwise stayed in the same vendor title through 1930. Being in the same 1597 deed is not enough by itself.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: NEW OUTLYING-ESTATE AUDIT — high historic relevance, but manor-membership and modern successor parcels unproved
1597 Watlington / Tottenhill / Setchey subcluster
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1597 Watlington / Tottenhill / Setchey subcluster
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: HARE 2402 includes Colt lands in Watlington, Tottenhill and Setchey; medieval Watlington fee evidence also links Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey but identities and parcel descent must be controlled
Historic Description / Extent: Unspecified messuages, lands and tenements in the 1597 catalogue abstract
Later Continuity Evidence: 1930 deed independently names Watlington, Watlington Colts/Trusbutts and Tottenhill among the four lordship package; no physical parcel schedule yet recovered
Present Physical Survival: Unknown
Current Registered Owner: Not identified
Known Severance Evidence: 1749 Watlington inclosure and other later conveyances are major possible severance/transformation points
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] This subcluster deserves priority because both 1597 and 1930 instruments name overlapping territorial/title interests, but no present land ownership follows without parcel-level continuity.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: PRIORITY OUTLYING CLUSTER — crosswalk HARE 2402, 1749 award, 1910 valuation, 1929/1930 deeds and HMLR
Unregistered / residual manorial fragment — general legal recovery class
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Unregistered / residual manorial fragment — general legal recovery class
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: HMLR PG22: physical manorial land can consist of scattered small pieces only where not transferred separately; PG10/PG1/PG2 govern modern status and proof
Historic Description / Extent: Any specifically reconstructed Colts parcel whose historic identity is proved and whose separate severance is not proved
Later Continuity Evidence: Must be traced through estate maps, deeds, assents, occupation/rent evidence and the 1929/1930 Watlington title instruments
Present Physical Survival: Parcel-dependent; physical survival alone is not title evidence
Current Registered Owner: Unknown until official SIM/title search. If SIM confirms unregistered, that still means owned by somebody, not ownerless.
Known Severance Evidence: A distinct freehold transfer defeats this class for the transferred parcel; absence of a found deed is not itself proof no transfer occurred
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Potentially yes only if the specific parcel remained in the vendor's title in 1930 and devolved through the later legal chain to the present claimant
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: LEGAL RECOVERY CLASS — NOT A PROVED PRESENT PARCEL OR PRESENT OWNERSHIP
Next Decisive Evidence: Reconstruct parcel plan → HMLR SIM → obtain affected registered titles/cautions → prove root/devolution from 1929/1930 deeds and assents → use PG2 reconstruction only if title deeds are genuinely lost
Trussbut Lodge, 22 The Green — modern place-name lead
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Trussbut Lodge, 22 The Green — modern place-name lead
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Current secondary property-address page uses 'Trussbut Lodge' at 22 The Green while listing Colts Hall at 21 The Green
Historic Description / Extent: Modern named residential property; historic origin/date of the name not yet found
Later Continuity Evidence: Official 2009 council statement shows Trussbot Lodge is modern/post-war development; no historical continuity survives from the name itself.
Present Physical Survival: Current address exists in public property data; exact cadastral relationship to Colts Hall/historic tenements not yet proved
Current Registered Owner: Not verified from HMLR
Known Severance Evidence: Not applicable as a historic-severance clue; the modern house/name post-dates the historic Trussbut estate.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No. The modern name cannot support a 1930 devolution inference.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: HISTORIC-CONTINUITY LEAD CLOSED / DOWNGRADED — retain only as modern location control
Next Decisive Evidence: No further title priority from the name alone. Re-open only if a pre-modern deed/map independently uses Trussbot/Trussbut for this exact parcel.
Shouldham enclosure residual strips — former greens / commons / road verges / drains / waste
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Shouldham enclosure residual strips — former greens / commons / road verges / drains / waste
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: 1796 enclosure notice proves named Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe greens, commons, fen/waste and roads were being formally reorganised; several crossed or adjoined Thomas Hare land. No specific Colts ownership of these features is yet proved.
Historic Description / Extent: Pound/Found Green; Seaff Green; Abbey Common; South Green; Hengate/Finchley/Thorpe/Fedderston Greens; Button Fen; roads, lanes and drain/fence infrastructure covered by the 1798 schedule.
Later Continuity Evidence: 1798 allotment schedule exists; later HARE 6832 (1811) and 1843 tithe should show what became of each feature.
Present Physical Survival: Many road/green corridors likely survive physically in altered form; exact legal parcels are unverified.
Current Registered Owner: Not verified from HMLR. Highway surface ownership and underlying/subsoil title may differ.
Known Severance Evidence: The 1794–98 enclosure itself is a major transformation/allotment event, but the exact awards and proprietary allocations have not yet been read.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Only a specific strip shown by the enclosure/title chain to remain with the relevant manor/estate and not separately conveyed could potentially descend through the later title chain.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: NEW HIGH-PRIORITY ENCLOSURE-RESIDUE AUDIT — NOT PROVED COLTS LAND
Next Decisive Evidence: Full 1798 schedule/award/map → 1811 HARE 6832 → 1843 tithe → 1871 HARE 5466 → 1910 valuation/modern maps → HMLR SIM/title plans.
Road subsoil / verge / hedge-and-ditch / stream or water-bed micro-fragments
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Road subsoil / verge / hedge-and-ditch / stream or water-bed micro-fragments
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts-specific modern fragment is yet proved. HMLR PG40 confirms legal presumptions can place roadway soil, ditches, stream beds or lake beds within adjoining ownership, subject to contrary evidence.
Historic Description / Extent: Potential slivers beneath/along old roads, lanes, verges, ditches, banks, non-tidal streams or enclosed water adjoining proven historic Colts parcels.
Later Continuity Evidence: Requires parcel-by-parcel deed and boundary-plan tracing; general-boundary registration can leave exact legal lines unresolved.
Present Physical Survival: Physical features may survive while ownership differs from surface use/maintenance.
Current Registered Owner: Not verified. A highway authority may hold the highway surface while underlying soil may have a different title; presumptions are rebuttable.
Known Severance Evidence: Any conveyance, enclosure allotment, statutory vesting, determined boundary or contrary deed wording can defeat the residual-title hypothesis.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Potential only where a specific micro-parcel can be tied to the historic Colts holding and shown never to have been separately transferred out of the claimant's devolution.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: LEGAL MICRO-PARCEL CONTROL — useful search class, not an ownership finding
Next Decisive Evidence: Map historic abuttals/roads → establish highway/feature status → inspect pre-registration deeds → SIM/adjoining registers → resolve any apparent unregistered sliver.
1512 Watlington court-roll holding set — five customary transactions, parcel names unresolved
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1512 Watlington court-roll holding set — five customary transactions, parcel names unresolved
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: SL26/6/CR/1 now establishes a functioning 1512 general court of a Manor of Watlington with repeated customary surrender/admission transactions. It does NOT yet identify the manor as Colts/Trussbutts.
Historic Description / Extent: At least five transaction blocks. Formulae show surrender into the lord's hands, admission of a recipient, tenant/heirs, manor custom, services formerly due and accustomed, entry fines, fealty and full seisin by the rod in at least one entry. Personal names, exact holding descriptions, quantities and boundaries remain unresolved.
Later Continuity Evidence: Immediate comparison remains the 8 Jul 1506 Wyatt/Pynkeney fine, but Pass 65 further expands the competing medieval streams. The 1329/30 Bardolf IPM separately records a Geoffrey Bryseyard 'Watlington and Longham' manor and another Watlington-linked one-fee block. Later scholarship and Tawney point to a distinct 1610-11 Coke/Holkham Longham-Priors-Watlington complex. [Inference] This makes the Bryseyard/Longham stream a weaker candidate for the Shouldham-centred Trusbut fee and strengthens the need to identify SL26/6 internally rather than by place-name.
Present Physical Survival: Unknown until the individual 1512 holdings can be named and mapped.
Current Registered Owner: Not applicable / not identifiable until a specific holding is reconstructed.
Known Severance Evidence: Unknown. A customary tenant holding may later have been surrendered, inherited, enfranchised or separately conveyed; the court roll alone does not establish the later freehold chain.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Valuable as a parcel-genealogy source, but the holdings recorded are tenant/customary estates rather than automatically the lord's demesne. Only a specific parcel/right shown to remain in the relevant manor-owner's title could feed into the 1930 conveyance; the 1512 admissions themselves do not make those tenant holdings present lordship land.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found
Current Audit Status: PRIMARY PARCEL-GENEALOGY SOURCE — CONTENT SUBSTANTIALLY READ; COLTS IDENTITY AND FACT-SPECIFIC PARCELS STILL UNRESOLVED. RAMSEY ABBEY 1435-36 GENERIC WATLINGTON COURT NOW ADDED AS A COMPETING IDENTITY CONTROL; FYNCHAM CLERICAL/FAMILY BRIDGE REMAINS SECONDARY.
Next Decisive Evidence: Priority comparison order: recover first 1540 Watlington-with-West Dereham roll; recover Simon Fyncham probate/institution and St Peter presentation; recover Ramsey 1435-36 roll; trace the 1330 Bryseyard Watlington-and-Longham block into the 1610-11 Longham/Priors/Coke material; compare the separate Trusbut 1403/1427 fee; continue HARE 1870-1 / 1875-6. Do not merge streams absent documentary crossover.
One rood of 'old poor's land' — 1845 micro-parcel control
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: One rood of 'old poor's land' — 1845 micro-parcel control
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts evidence. White 1845 separately identifies one rood of old poor's land.
Historic Description / Extent: 1 rood (quarter acre), let for 12s in 1845; separate from the 95-acre Fuel Allotment.
Later Continuity Evidence: Later status not yet traced. 1912 directory still refers generally to poor's land and fuel allotment.
Present Physical Survival: Unknown; exact parcel not yet located.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: None identified; this is a control parcel, not a Colts claim.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No Colts basis. Its importance is demonstrating that a tiny separately identified historic landholding could survive locally.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: LOCAL MICRO-PARCEL SURVIVAL CONTROL — EXCLUDE FROM COLTS CLAIM unless an independent Colts link is found.
Next Decisive Evidence: Trace through 1794 award/poor-land papers, later charity schemes, ACC 2022/153 and HMLR.
Shouldham Poors Charity / Mill Road allotment — modern surviving special-purpose land lead
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Shouldham Poors Charity / Mill Road allotment — modern surviving special-purpose land lead
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts evidence. Charity Commission roots charity 207556 in 1794 Inclosure Award; council says Shouldham Poors Charity offered allotment land at Mill Road.
Historic Description / Extent: Modern allotment/community-orchard land at entry to village from Mill Road; acreage not stated.
Later Continuity Evidence: Charity 207556 remains registered and Commission says it owns and/or leases land/property; council project material gives modern parcel location.
Present Physical Survival: Land is in current community-orchard use/project context; exact cadastral extent not retrieved.
Current Registered Owner: Not verified. Charity may own or lease; council source does not state title number.
Known Severance Evidence: Unknown. Relationship to original 95A fuel allotment / one-rood poor's land not yet proved.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No Colts basis. This is a modern control proving that an old special-purpose land stream can still have an identifiable parcel.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: VERY HIGH LOCAL CONTINUITY CONTROL — NOT COLTS LAND; exact charity/title chain now traceable.
Next Decisive Evidence: Confirm charity identity 207556 → obtain site plan/agreement → HMLR title/SIM → compare 1794 award, 1845 and ACC 2022/153.
ACC 2022/153 possible Shouldham extent — late 15th/early 16th-century holding landscape
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: ACC 2022/153 possible Shouldham extent — late 15th/early 16th-century holding landscape
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Potential contextual overlap only; TNA says ?Shouldham, or possibly Fincham/Runcton Holme.
Historic Description / Extent: Part of an extent; exact holdings/acreages/tenants not yet known.
Later Continuity Evidence: Could be compared directly with SL26/6/CR/1 (1512), HARE 2402/2403 (1597) and HARE 2495 (1633) if the place proves to be Shouldham.
Present Physical Survival: Not applicable until transcription.
Current Registered Owner: Not applicable.
Known Severance Evidence: Unknown.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] If it is genuinely a Shouldham extent and names holdings later identifiable as Colts/Trussbutts, it could materially extend parcel continuity backward toward 1512.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: CRITICAL EARLY-PARCEL RETRIEVAL TARGET — identity explicitly uncertain.
Next Decisive Evidence: Obtain ACC 2022/153 extent images/item description; transcribe; compare every person/place/abuttal to 1512 court roll and later Colts records.
HMLR INSPIRE apparent-gap screen — current freehold geometry
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: HMLR INSPIRE apparent-gap screen — current freehold geometry
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No ownership evidence by itself; method applied only after historic Colts geometry is reconstructed.
Historic Description / Extent: Any historic Colts candidate polygon or micro-strip lacking/partly lacking current INSPIRE freehold coverage.
Later Continuity Evidence: August 2026 current freehold polygon dataset + new INSPIRE-ID lookup can identify candidate registered-freehold coverage and apparent gaps.
Present Physical Survival: Parcel-dependent.
Current Registered Owner: Not established by INSPIRE. SIM/register/plan required.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance conclusion from polygon presence/absence alone.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] An apparent gap is worth prioritising, but only a proven unregistered parcel with an unbroken claimant title chain could become a recovery candidate.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: SCREENING CLASS ONLY — apparent gap ≠ unregistered ≠ ownerless ≠ Colts.
Next Decisive Evidence: Download King's Lynn & West Norfolk GML → clip to historic parcel polygons → log INSPIRE IDs/gaps → run SIM on every serious gap.
1985 10-acre freehold 'near the hall', Shouldham — Pearce Farms mortgage
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1985 10-acre freehold 'near the hall', Shouldham — Pearce Farms mortgage
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No direct Colts title evidence. Official Companies House proves a distinct 10-acre freehold parcel at Shouldham; Alfred George Pearce's company/officer correspondence was at Colts Hall.
Historic Description / Extent: 10 acres freehold; described only as 'near the hall shouldham kings lynn norfolk'.
Later Continuity Evidence: Charge created 15 Jan 1985; official filing history now confirms a 403b 'Declaration of mortgage charge released/ceased' filed 16 Jun 1992; charges were later satisfied 13 Aug 2009. Separate company charges covered Mill Farm and Sutton Fen Farm acreage.
Present Physical Survival: Unknown until mortgage/title geometry is recovered.
Current Registered Owner: Not verified from HMLR.
Known Severance Evidence: The 1985 mortgage proves separate freehold treatment at that date. The 16 Jun 1992 403b is a possible release/restructuring event, but the public metadata does not identify which charge/property it affected; it cannot yet be treated as severance of the 10-acre parcel.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Only if the parcel can be matched to proven Colts land and its chain reconciled with the 1930 manor conveyance. At present this is a modern identification lead, not a recovery conclusion.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: VERY HIGH MODERN PARCEL IDENTIFICATION LEAD — HALL IDENTITY AND COLTS LINK UNPROVED.
Next Decisive Evidence: Request/read the 16 Jun 1992 403b first → identify charge/property/extent → recover historic HMLR title number/plan → geolocate the 10 acres → overlay 1633 HARE 2495, 1811 map, tithe, HARE 5466 and pre-1930 OS/Valuation Office plans → trace conveyances both directions.
1883 livestock pound site within scheduled Colts-farm landscape
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1883 livestock pound site within scheduled Colts-farm landscape
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Historic England places the pound platform within the scheduled settlement landscape around Colt's Hall and derives surrounding Colts components from HARE 2495; it does not state that the pound itself was owned by the manor.
Historic Description / Extent: Low sub-rectangular platform about 38m WNW–ESE x 28m in south-west corner bordering the road; pound marked on 1883 OS.
Later Continuity Evidence: 1883 OS mark survives as identifiable archaeological platform in Historic England description.
Present Physical Survival: Platform/earthwork survives within scheduled monument landscape.
Current Registered Owner: Not verified from HMLR.
Known Severance Evidence: Unknown. Pound function/site may have been parish, manor, estate or other land depending on title history.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Potential only if enclosure/tithe/deeds show the pound soil remained part of Colts/reputed manor land and was not separately vested/conveyed.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: HIGH-PRIORITY MICROPARCEL / MANORIAL-FUNCTION TEST — FUNCTION DOES NOT EQUAL OWNERSHIP.
Next Decisive Evidence: Plot exact 1883 OS pound → 1798 enclosure schedule/map → 1811 HARE map → 1843 tithe parcel/owner → 1910 valuation → modern SIM/title.
1911 Shouldham small-holdings 30A/16A fields — statutory fragmentation control
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1911 Shouldham small-holdings 30A/16A fields — statutory fragmentation control
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts-specific evidence in Hansard.
Historic Description / Extent: 30-acre proposed acquisition field; alternative 16-acre field adjoining other small holdings.
Later Continuity Evidence: Hansard proves the acquisition proposal and refusal/alternative offer; farm and later outcome unverified.
Present Physical Survival: Unknown.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: Potential statutory acquisition/lease/reorganisation process, but the 30-acre order was not confirmed and no completion of the 16-acre alternative is stated.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No direct route to the 1930 manor without identifying the farm/parcels.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: HIGH-VALUE LOCAL FRAGMENTATION CONTROL — NOT A COLTS CLAIM PARCEL.
Next Decisive Evidence: Norfolk County Small Holdings Committee / Board of Agriculture files → farm/owner → maps → compare to Hare/Colts estate schedules.
1910–15 Valuation Office dual-route bridge — TNA IR 127/8 / IR 58 + NRO P/DLV/1
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1910–15 Valuation Office dual-route bridge — TNA IR 127/8 / IR 58 + NRO P/DLV/1
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No new Colts ownership finding yet. Historic Colts geometry is already anchored by HARE 2495/HARE 6832/tithe; the valuation records can attach Edwardian owner/occupier/legal-interest data to the matching assessment parcels.
Historic Description / Extent: Annotated 25-inch plans for Norfolk LVII.7 and XLV.16 in Peterborough (King's Lynn) District IR 127/8; Pass 90 identifies IR 127/8/450–458 as an exact accessioned plan run to test. Local NRO valuation-book/schedule reference remains unknown.
Later Continuity Evidence: 1904/05 OS editions bracket the survey; 1927/28 editions provide immediate pre-1930 geometry. Both Shouldham sheets must be tested. Current TheGenealogist Lloyd George coverage does not yet include Norfolk.
Present Physical Survival: Physical landscape/map coverage survives digitally; national annotated plans/IR58 and local P/DLV records still need retrieval.
Current Registered Owner: Not yet identified; IR 58 field books and local valuation books can name owner/occupier and legal interest.
Known Severance Evidence: Unknown until assessment/field-book/local valuation records and subsequent deeds are read.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] If the same proprietor/estate appears on the proven Colts parcel immediately before 1929/1930, continuity strengthens. A distinct freeholder would identify a potential earlier severance. The local and national records should be cross-checked rather than relying on one series.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: CRITICAL PRE-1930 OWNERSHIP CROSSWALK — TWO INDEPENDENT RECORD ROUTES NOW DEFINED; OWNER STILL UNREAD.
Next Decisive Evidence: Test IR 127/8/450–458 for BOTH LVII.7 and XLV.16 -> assessment/hereditament no. + income-tax parish -> IR 58 field book. In parallel locate NRO P/DLV/1 Shouldham/income-tax-parish valuation book -> compare owner/occupier/area -> 1929/1930 deeds.
2001 protection agreement + 2002 scheduling file — Colts-farm earthworks owner/parcel identification route
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 2001 protection agreement + 2002 scheduling file — Colts-farm earthworks owner/parcel identification route
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Historic England ties the scheduled area to the 1633 Colts components and later Colt's Farm; Norfolk Heritage Explorer says the surviving pasture earthworks have been under a protection agreement since 2001.
Historic Description / Extent: Scheduled monument 1020446, NGR TF6798808844, legacy RSM 30601; landscape north/east/southeast of Colt's Hall. Exact protection-agreement cadastral parcel/title is not public.
Later Continuity Evidence: Protection agreement since 2001; monument first scheduled 11 Feb 2002. Historic England says the official list copy derives from an original held by DCMS.
Present Physical Survival: Earthworks survive beneath pasture; scheduled-monument map exists.
Current Registered Owner: Not stated on the public heritage records.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance deed identified. Protection/scheduling is not itself a transfer of ownership.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] The administrative files may identify the then owner/occupier and definitive protected boundary, providing a modern-title bridge; they do not themselves establish devolution with the lordship.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: VERY HIGH MODERN OWNER/PARCEL IDENTIFICATION ROUTE — NOT TITLE EVIDENCE UNTIL FILES ARE READ.
Next Decisive Evidence: Request NHER 4283 protection agreement + plan and Historic England/DCMS designation file under RSM 30601 / NHLE 1020446 → extract owner/occupier only if present → identify HMLR title(s) → crosswalk historic Colts parcels.
1506 Wallington/Thorpland comparator — CP 25/1/170/197 no.102
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1506 Wallington/Thorpland comparator — CP 25/1/170/197 no.102
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts ownership evidence. Direct legal comparator seven weeks before the Wyatt Watlyngton manor concord.
Historic Description / Extent: 3 messuages + 30 acres in Wallyngton' and Thorplond'; parties William and Robert Amfles v Thomas and Ellen Holdyche.
Later Continuity Evidence: Same Feet of Fines series: no.102 on 22 May 1506; no.106 on 8 Jul 1506 separately records the Manor of Watlyngton', free fold and St Peter advowson.
Present Physical Survival: Historic geography survives as Wallington cum Thorpland; this row is not a candidate Colts parcel.
Current Registered Owner: Not applicable.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event. It is a distinct legal-property stream.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No. Its value is to prevent a false merger of Wallington/Thorpland into Watlington when reconstructing the Tudor title and 1512 court.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: VERY HIGH IDENTITY / PLACE-NAME CONTROL — EXCLUDE FROM COLTS CLAIM PARCELS.
Next Decisive Evidence: Use as a mandatory comparator whenever a Tudor source says Wallington/Walyngton/Watlington; require record-specific proof before normalising.
Ramsey Abbey Watlington manor court — 14 Hen VI (1435-1436) identity comparator
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Ramsey Abbey Watlington manor court — 14 Hen VI (1435-1436) identity comparator
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts ownership evidence. Official archival inventory places a Watlington manor court baron/customary court roll within Ramsey Abbey's Norfolk estate records.
Historic Description / Extent: Underlying court roll not yet retrieved; exact tenants, parcels, lord and steward unknown.
Later Continuity Evidence: Predates Wyatt's 1506 Watlington manor by ~70 years and SL26/6 by ~76 years; provides a distinct possible generic-Watlington institutional stream.
Present Physical Survival: Not a modern parcel candidate.
Current Registered Owner: Not applicable.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event shown.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No. Its value is identity control: it demonstrates that a generic Watlington manorial court existed in another archival/estate context.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: CRITICAL MULTIPLE-MANOR IDENTITY CONTROL — EXCLUDE FROM COLTS CLAIM UNLESS A DOCUMENTARY BRIDGE IS FOUND.
Next Decisive Evidence: Recover modern shelfmark/original roll → transcribe lord/steward/tenants/holdings → compare with 1506 Wyatt, 1512 SL26/6, St Peter patronage, Gawsell/Shuldham and HARE records.
Watlington-with-West Dereham court-roll series — 1540-1566, 1786-1909
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Watlington-with-West Dereham court-roll series — 1540-1566, 1786-1909
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts ownership evidence yet. Named catalogue series for a distinct Watlington-with-West Dereham manor court.
Historic Description / Extent: Underlying holdings unknown until rolls are read.
Later Continuity Evidence: Begins in 1540; [Inference] candidate for William Butts's first court for the former West Dereham Abbey manor in Watlington. Later series resumes 1786.
Present Physical Survival: Not a modern parcel candidate until holdings are extracted and mapped.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: Unknown; court continuity does not itself prove land-title continuity.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] If 1540 tenants/holdings recur in SL26/6, this could identify the 1512 manor stream; if they do not, it can eliminate a major candidate.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: CRITICAL 1512 MANOR-IDENTIFICATION / ELIMINATION SERIES — NOT COLTS UNTIL BRIDGED.
Next Decisive Evidence: Direct catalogue/film/shelfmark -> first 1540 court -> transcribe all names/holdings -> compare 1512 -> trace through 1566 and later 1786+ records.
Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall — court book 1622-1785
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall — court book 1622-1785
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No target Colts ownership evidence. TNA official accession describes a separate named manor in the same broader landscape.
Historic Description / Extent: Underlying tenants/holdings/incidents unknown until court book inspection.
Later Continuity Evidence: ACC 2002/145 supplies a long continuous court-book target; Vision of Britain places Tittleshall manor within Runcton Holme.
Present Physical Survival: Not a present Colts parcel candidate.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No target severance event shown.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No. Its immediate role is to distinguish collateral Trusbut/Tittleshall property from Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts and prevent surname/title conflation.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: COLLATERAL TRUSBUT COMPARATOR — EXCLUDE FROM TARGET CLAIM ABSENT EXPRESS BRIDGE.
Next Decisive Evidence: Resolve NRO subreference -> extract manor title/lord/steward/tenant index -> compare 1597 Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes deed and Runcton Holme holdings.
1330 Geoffrey Bryseyard — manor in Watlington and Longham
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1330 Geoffrey Bryseyard — manor in Watlington and Longham
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts ownership evidence. Bardolf IPM places a distinct manor/fee under the Wormegay honour.
Historic Description / Extent: Manor in Watlington and Longham, held for 1 knight's fee; exact parcels/acreage not itemised in the calendar clause.
Later Continuity Evidence: Distinct from another contemporary one-fee Watlington/Foston/Wallington/Setchey/Hardwick block. Later 1403/1427 Trusbut fee must be bridged, not assumed.
Present Physical Survival: Not a modern parcel candidate.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event shown.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] A possible competing antecedent to later Longham/Priors/Coke material; not currently the preferred Trusbut antecedent.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: CRITICAL MEDIEVAL IDENTITY CONTROL — EXCLUDE FROM COLTS UNTIL A DESCENT BRIDGE IS FOUND.
Next Decisive Evidence: Trace Bryseyard/Brisyerd title -> Longham/Priors records -> Coke/Holkham; independently trace Trusbut fee -> compare tenants, services and places.
Longham-Priors-Coke / Holkham 1610-1611 stream
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Longham-Priors-Coke / Holkham 1610-1611 stream
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts ownership evidence. Separate Longham Priors purchase and Holkham manuscript labels involving Longham/Watlington/Priors.
Historic Description / Extent: Underlying 1611 holdings not yet extracted.
Later Continuity Evidence: Coke purchase 28 Sep 1610; Tawney source list identifies 1611 Longham and Watlington / Watlington and Priors records.
Present Physical Survival: Not a present Colts parcel candidate.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No target severance event shown.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No. Its role is to provide a competing Longham/Watlington title stream and prevent the 1330 Longham manor from being silently folded into Trusbut/Colts.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: COMPETING LONGHAM/PRIORS STREAM — EXCLUDE FROM TARGET CLAIM ABSENT EXPRESS CROSSOVER.
Next Decisive Evidence: Recover Holkham manuscript/catalogue originals -> extract tenants/parcels/foldcourse -> compare 1330 Bryseyard and 1427 Trusbut clusters.
Kervile Manor of Watlington / Richard succession / Geoffrey Islington estate — 1427-1567+ comparator
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Kervile Manor of Watlington / Richard succession / Geoffrey Islington estate — 1427-1567+ comparator
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts ownership evidence. Robert's 1434 will directly gives the Watlington manor to Richard and separately gives Geoffrey a fee-simple messuage and named lands in Islington. Gurney's Watlington pedigree says Richard died without issue, but Pass 71 identifies no stated underlying source for that claim.
Historic Description / Extent: Watlington manor; Monys; Kreykyscroft; Geoffrey's Islington messuage and named Derebougth, Andrewys, Oldrobbyslond, Reynhaldeslond, Bulweryslond, Goldmeysacre, Palmeryscroft and Rokys; later Watlington capital messuage, rents/services, windmills, foldcourse-and-a-half.
Later Continuity Evidence: Pass 71 correction: Gurney explicitly says Islington Court Rolls contributed to corrections of the Wiggenhall St Mary's pedigree, not expressly to the separate Watlington pedigree. Thus Richard d.s.p. is not yet court-roll-grounded. Geoffrey's Islington holdings, however, are directly grounded in Robert's will and can be pursued independently.
Present Physical Survival: Exact Watlington manor boundaries and modern parcel correlation not mapped; Geoffrey's Islington parcels also not mapped.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No Colts severance event shown. The missing Watlington event remains the legal fate of Richard's manor.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No. This remains a separate competing Kervile manor stream and a distinct collateral Islington estate.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: SOURCE CONTROL CORRECTED — DIRECT MANOR TO RICHARD / DIRECT ISLINGTON ESTATE TO GEOFFREY; RICHARD D.S.P. PRIMARY BASIS UNKNOWN.
Next Decisive Evidence: 1435-36 Watlington court -> Richard death/heirship/deeds/fines -> original Register Surflete -> Geoffrey named Islington parcels -> locate older Islington rolls -> BL 1496-1506 accounts -> Thomas return to Watlington.
Pre-Kervile de Watlyngton provenance — 1340 Thorpland / 1361 Kervyle association
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Pre-Kervile de Watlyngton provenance — 1340 Thorpland / 1361 Kervyle association
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts ownership evidence. Direct royal records place Adam son of John de Watlyngton in a Thorpland land transaction in 1340 and John de Watlyngton together with Edmund Kervyle in a 1361 west-Norfolk mortmain conveyance.
Historic Description / Extent: 1340: two acres in Thorplond. 1361: four messuages, 180 acres land, six acres meadow and fourteen acres pasture across Clenchwarton, Tilney, Wiggenhall, South Lynn, Middleton and West Lynn.
Later Continuity Evidence: These records are earlier than Robert Kervyle's 1434 will and therefore provide concrete de Watlyngton/Kervyle network leads for the will's prior-provenance clause. Exact identity with John son of William son of Thomas de Wathlington is not established.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped to the Kervile manor or any modern Watlington parcel.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event shown.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No. This is provenance research only and must not be used to import Thorpland or the 1361 property package into Watlington-Colts.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: PRE-KERVILE PROVENANCE / NETWORK CONTROL — NOT A PARCEL CLAIM.
Next Decisive Evidence: Identify Adam/John de Watlyngton family; locate William and Thomas; search deeds/fines for Watlington manor; recover original royal-roll images; test whether any lineage reaches the John named in Robert's 1434 will.
Shuldham-line Manor of Watlington — Bartholomew coheirs / Hawdekyn-Curteys / Shuldham
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Shuldham-line Manor of Watlington — Bartholomew coheirs / Hawdekyn-Curteys / Shuldham
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts ownership proof. John Bartholomew held this manor; his elder daughter Margaret carried the manor into Glemsford/Hawdekyn, while daughter Agnes married William de Shuldham and forms the Shuldham coheir branch ultimately associated with Thomas Shuldham.
Historic Description / Extent: Manor/title/advowson rights; exact land schedule not stated. Separate 1373/1386 Shuldham land parcel dealt with Thomas son Nicholas Trussbut.
Later Continuity Evidence: Pass 73 refines the succession: Thomas Shuldham's later claim is genealogically inside the Bartholomew coheir family through Agnes, not an unrelated acquisition. Dashwood's specific 'would succeed' wording remains inference as to the operative transition after Curteys.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No Colts severance event shown.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: No. Stronger family/title-network contact with Trussbut is now proved, but no Watlington manor parcel crossed to Trussbut in the evidence found.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: COMPETING MANOR WITH DIRECT COHEIR-FAMILY/TRUSSBUT CONTACT — MERGER NOT PROVED.
Next Decisive Evidence: Primary coheir/title instruments -> Curteys livery -> Thomas succession -> 1373/1386 deed bounds -> 1435-36 court identity.
1373/1386 Bartholomew-Shuldham coheir branch -> Trussbut land crossover
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1373/1386 Bartholomew-Shuldham coheir branch -> Trussbut land crossover
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: William de Shuldham and wife Agnes, a daughter of John Bartholomew in the Watlington-manor coheir pedigree, directly dealt with Thomas son of Nicholas Trussbut over land in Shuldham.
Historic Description / Extent: One parcel of land in Shuldham/Shouldham; exact bounds/acreage/tenure unrecovered.
Later Continuity Evidence: 1373 security/protection deed and 1386 widow's release cited from Stow Bardolph deeds. Pass 73 establishes Agnes's place inside the Watlington title family.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No Watlington severance event shown.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Potentially important parcel-level crossover, but it cannot be treated as Colts land or manor land until the original deed and later parcel chain are recovered.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: DIRECT TITLE-FAMILY/TRUSSBUT PROPERTY CROSSOVER — NO WATLINGTON PARCEL IDENTITY YET.
Next Decisive Evidence: Modern HARE/NRO refs -> full deed bounds/tenure -> later Trussbut/Colt/Shouldham schedules -> map if identifiable.
1393-94 Fyncham-Trusbut marriage -> 1403 Lawrence Trussebute Watlington fees
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1393-94 Fyncham-Trusbut marriage -> 1403 Lawrence Trussebute Watlington fees
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Direct Trusbut Watlington fee tenure is proved in 1403; a secondary pedigree cites Alicia Fyncham's marriage settlement to Laurence Trusbutt of Shouldham in 1393-94. Same 1403 schedule shows separate John de Fyncham interests in Foston/Shouldham Thorpe and Fincham/West Dereham.
Historic Description / Extent: Lawrence: Watlington quarter-fee plus full fee across Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey/Shouldham Thorpe/Langham. John Fyncham: separate Foston/Shouldham Thorpe quarter-fee and another broader fee.
Later Continuity Evidence: Chronology and marriage make a close family/property network; acquisition path remains unknown.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped to modern parcels.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No later Colts severance event shown here.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Potentially important direct antecedent of the Trusbut Watlington title/fee stream; cannot establish manor identity from knight's-fee evidence alone.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: VERY HIGH PRIORITY MEDIEVAL TRUSBUT TENURE NETWORK — MARRIAGE SETTLEMENT MISSING.
Next Decisive Evidence: Original 17 Ric II settlement -> 1403 fee extents -> 1427 fee schedule -> 1451 Trusbut testament -> 1597 Colts/Trusbuttes identity bridge.
Burnham Deepdale component of Thomas Shuldham grouped estate — 1467 to Fyncham by 1474/1496
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Burnham Deepdale component of Thomas Shuldham grouped estate — 1467 to Fyncham by 1474/1496
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No direct Colts parcel. Thomas Shuldham's 1467 title context grouped Watlington, Shouldham and Deepdale for widow Margaret's life. A 1474 annuity charter and later Fyncham title evidence indicate Deepdale separated from that group.
Historic Description / Extent: Manor of Depdale/Deepdale alias Holkhammes; annual rent 8 marks 6s.8d.; later Fyncham manor in Depdale and Brancaster.
Later Continuity Evidence: [Inference] Same-year 1474 annuity and reported Fyncham purchase strongly indicate restructuring of Margaret's life interest as Deepdale transferred into the Fyncham estate. Official 1496 IPM confirms Fyncham possession by the end of the century.
Present Physical Survival: Deepdale, not a present Watlington parcel.
Current Registered Owner: By 1496 Fyncham title/possession is officially catalogued.
Known Severance Evidence: Likely 1474 Deepdale severance from the Shuldham three-manor grouping; exact instrument unproved.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Indirectly useful: demonstrates that grouped manors in Thomas Shuldham's estate could be legally separated, so Watlington must be traced independently after 1467 rather than assuming Shouldham/Deepdale shared its later descent.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: STRONG HISTORIC SEVERANCE MODEL — DEEPDALE, NOT COLTS; OPERATIVE PURCHASE DEED MISSING.
Next Decisive Evidence: 1474 purchase/annuity originals -> Thomas 1467 will -> Margaret later records -> Watlington-specific post-1467 title -> Shouldham-specific post-1467 title.
1403 Lawrence -> 1427 Thomas Trusbut recurring Watlington one-fee block
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1403 Lawrence -> 1427 Thomas Trusbut recurring Watlington one-fee block
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Direct primary-derived fee records now show a highly similar one-knight-fee block under Lawrence Trussebute in 1403 and Thomas Trusbut in 1427.
Historic Description / Extent: 1403: Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey/Shouldham Thorpe/Langham one fee + separate Watlington quarter-fee. 1427: Watlington/Tottenhill/Garbodesthorp/Setchey/?Longham one fee.
Later Continuity Evidence: Three exact localities recur; Shouldham Thorpe/Garbodesthorp is strongly supported as an alias-family match by later official NRO records; fifth locality remains unresolved. Lawrence died by Easter 1418, narrowing holder transition to before May 1427.
Present Physical Survival: No modern parcel map yet; HARE 2493 is exact archive target for Lawrence's 330+ physical acres.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event: this is continuity evidence.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Yes as a medieval target stream: this is one of the strongest direct antecedent chains for the Trusbut side, but still not enough by itself to identify every later Colts parcel/title.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: VERY HIGH MEDIEVAL CONTINUITY — PRIORITISE PHYSICAL PARCEL EXTRACTION FROM HARE 2493.
Next Decisive Evidence: HARE 2493 parcel extraction -> HARE 2683-4 1386 additions -> Lawrence/Thomas succession -> 1427 forward fee chain -> 1451 Trusbut inheritance -> Colt estate schedules.
1413-14 Laurence ?Trussebut Runcton Holme lease
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1413-14 Laurence ?Trussebut Runcton Holme lease
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Institutional archive inventory directly describes a surviving 60-year Bromehill Priory lease to Laurence ?Trussebut of all lands/tenements/rents/tithes in Runcton Holme.
Historic Description / Extent: Catalogue attempts total c.4a 3r 20p; rent 20s p.a.; component measurements partly illegible. Exact parcel names/bounds not extracted.
Later Continuity Evidence: Runcton Holme later recurs among 1597 Colt estate lands. Separate Christ's College MR4,6 court rolls/rental provide an archive route for the locality.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped; original lease required.
Current Registered Owner: Leasehold interest for 60 years from 1413-14, if catalogue reading is correct.
Known Severance Evidence: Lease would expire in the fifteenth century absent renewal/other title; it is evidence of occupation/estate geography, not permanent title.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Yes as an early physical-land lead because Runcton Holme persists in later Trusbut/Colt geography, but no modern/current parcel claim follows.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: HIGH-VALUE EARLY LAND TARGET — ORIGINAL INDENTURE NEEDED FOR PARCEL MATCHING.
Next Decisive Evidence: MR7 item53(1) original -> MR4,6 rolls/rental -> HARE2493 -> HARE2402 1597 -> enclosure/Hare maps.
Jane/Joan Trusbut heiress -> Thomas Colt -> Joan IPM -> John Colt heir/ward
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Jane/Joan Trusbut heiress -> Thomas Colt -> Joan IPM -> John Colt heir/ward
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Heraldic pedigree proves Norfolk Trusbut heiress marriage and John as heir. Pass 78 adds substantive property from Joan's exact IPM trail: Lysons cites 15 Edw IV no.34 for Clayhall manor descending to John.
Historic Description / Extent: Known succession contexts: Cavendish/Colt's Hall and Clayhall, Barking. Exact Norfolk inherited estate remains unlisted.
Later Continuity Evidence: The IPM is now proven useful at estate level rather than merely a bibliographic reference. Its missing Norfolk return/content is the most valuable next target.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped for Watlington until Norfolk property appears.
Current Registered Owner: John succeeds Clayhall and Cavendish according to antiquarian histories.
Known Severance Evidence: Inheritance rather than severance; no Watlington event yet.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Extremely relevant as legal inheritance-package control. Still insufficient to equate medieval Trusbut fee with later Watlington-Colts.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: VERY HIGH IPM-BASED HEIRESS BRIDGE — SECOND MANOR IDENTIFIED, TARGET NORFOLK RETURN.
Next Decisive Evidence: C140/IPM full text -> Norfolk holdings -> John livery -> father/Runcton proof -> compare to 1403/1427 and 1597.
John Colt 1 Hen VII wardship / reported 5 Nov 1485 livery
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: John Colt 1 Hen VII wardship / reported 5 Nov 1485 livery
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Copinger reports John as Parr's ward in 1 Hen VII; BP2003-derived material reports livery 5 Nov 1485. TNA officially states records of livery of lands and sale of wardship after IPMs can often be found in Patent Rolls C66.
Historic Description / Extent: Property released remains unknown. Search hooks now include Cavendish, Clayhall and Suffolks plus Norfolk Trusbut localities.
Later Continuity Evidence: Pass 79 corrects retrieval strategy: prioritize Calendar of Patent Rolls Henry VII 1485-1494 / C66, while retaining Fine Rolls and escheator material as supplemental routes.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown until livery instrument recovered.
Known Severance Evidence: Potential termination of wardship/custody, not severance.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Critical to identify Joan-to-John inherited estate. No Norfolk land can be inferred from the secondary date alone.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: PRIMARY C66 LIVERY RECORD MISSING — SEARCH METHOD NOW OFFICIALLY GROUNDED.
Next Decisive Evidence: CPR Henry VII vol.1 / C66 around 5 Nov 1485 -> John Colt/Colte + Clayhall/Cavendish/Suffolks -> Norfolk escheator returns.
Joan Parr IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 — Clayhall property recovered
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Joan Parr IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 — Clayhall property recovered
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Independent antiquarian source explicitly ties Joan's 15 Edw IV no.34 escheat/IPM to the Manor of Clayhall in Barking and succession to John Colte.
Historic Description / Extent: Manor of Clayhall, Essex; held under Barking Abbey with quit-rent 15s.3d. and distinctive services. Cavendish is separately tied to Joan/John succession by Copinger.
Later Continuity Evidence: This proves the missing Joan-IPM trail contains substantive estate information beyond the Cavendish narrative and gives a second known manor to use as a search hook.
Present Physical Survival: Clayhall, Barking, Essex; not relevant to present Watlington parcel mapping.
Current Registered Owner: John Colte succeeds after Joan according to Lysons.
Known Severance Evidence: No Watlington severance event. This is inheritance-package reconstruction.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Indirect but strategically important: if the same IPM also lists Norfolk Trusbut estates, it can close the heiress-to-Colt identity chain.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: FIRST ACTUAL PROPERTY EXTRACT FROM JOAN-IPM TRAIL — NORFOLK RETURN STILL UNRECOVERED.
Next Decisive Evidence: Find modern C140 reference -> complete IPM transcript -> Norfolk county return -> livery 1485 -> compare to Trusbut/Colt estate.
Joan IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 — three known estate contexts
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Joan IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 — three known estate contexts
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Three independent antiquarian works tie the same exact medieval IPM reference to Joan/John succession at Cavendish, Clayhall and Suffolks.
Historic Description / Extent: Cavendish/Colt's Hall (Suffolk); Clayhall (Barking, Essex); Suffolks (Enfield, Middlesex). No Norfolk parcel yet recovered.
Later Continuity Evidence: This strongly demonstrates a multi-estate inheritance package and provides multiple hooks for recovering the original C140/E149 return.
Present Physical Survival: Non-Norfolk known estates; no Watlington mapping yet.
Current Registered Owner: John Colt succeeds in all three carrier narratives, though Robinson's genealogy/date is otherwise unreliable.
Known Severance Evidence: Inheritance-package reconstruction, not a Watlington severance event.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Very high strategic relevance: the complete IPM could directly reveal whether the Trusbut heiress transmitted the Watlington/Runcton/Shouldham estate complex into Colt.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: THREE KNOWN ESTATE CONTEXTS — ORIGINAL IPM IS NOW THE DECISIVE IDENTITY DOCUMENT.
Next Decisive Evidence: Calendarium IV scan -> C140 modern reference -> E149 counterpart -> complete county/property extraction -> John Colt C66 livery.
Joan fifteenth-year inquisition — NORFOLK estate presence visually verified in Rogers print
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Joan fifteenth-year inquisition — NORFOLK estate presence visually verified in Rogers print
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: The original scanned Rogers page itself states an extensive possession list in Berkshire, Middlesex, Norfolk, Essex and Suffolk; the printed Richard-II p72 footnote anomaly is also visibly confirmed.
Historic Description / Extent: Exact Norfolk manors/parcels still not extracted. Candidate places: Watlington, Shingham, Holme/Runcton Holme, Shouldham, Tottenhill, Setchey, Fincham, Wiggenhall, Thorpland.
Later Continuity Evidence: Pass 81 raises confidence that Norfolk was genuinely asserted by Rogers while simultaneously lowering confidence in his cited source reference. The actual C140/E149/Calendarium land list is therefore even more important.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped until exact Norfolk names are recovered.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: Inheritance package, not severance.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Extremely high relevance. The county presence is no longer OCR-dependent.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: NORFOLK ASSERTION DIRECTLY VERIFIED IN PRINT — EXACT MEDIEVAL RETURN STILL MISSING.
Next Decisive Evidence: Calendarium no.34 -> C140/E149 -> Norfolk place list -> John Colt C66 livery -> compare against medieval fee and 1597 Colt estate.
John Trusbut father/seat — source ladder and conflict
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: John Trusbut father/seat — source ladder and conflict
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Direct visitation says only Trusbut of Norfolk; Gough says John of Shingham; Powys-Lybbe says John of Holme; BP2003-derived material says John of Runcton Holme.
Historic Description / Extent: No exact inherited parcel presently attributable to any of the three specific seat forms.
Later Continuity Evidence: The evidence now suggests possible later source expansion from generic 'Holme' to 'Runcton Holme', but this is only a source-history hypothesis. Shingham remains an independent early antiquarian tradition.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Very high relevance because the correct seat may identify the Norfolk property transferred to Colt.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: FOUR-TIER SOURCE CONFLICT — DO NOT COLLAPSE OR NORMALISE THE SEAT.
Next Decisive Evidence: Original IPM/will/deeds/courts + Harley MS1177 -> compare Shingham, unspecified Holme and Runcton Holme independently.
Joan IPM no.34 / C 140/52 piece-level target; source-specific /13 citation — five known estate contexts
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Joan IPM no.34 / C 140/52 piece-level target; source-specific /13 citation — five known estate contexts
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: VCH gives C 140/52/13 for Joan's Clayhall succession passage; Copinger independently adds Boxstead Manor and Peyton/'Peytones' Hall to I.P.M. 15 Edw IV no.34. Existing evidence already supplied Cavendish/Colt's Hall, Clayhall and Suffolks.
Historic Description / Extent: Known property contexts now: Cavendish/Colt's Hall (Suffolk); Clayhall (Barking, Essex); Suffolks (Enfield, Middlesex); Boxstead Manor (Suffolk); Peyton/'Peytones' Hall, Ramsholt (Suffolk). Rogers also expressly reports Norfolk among the counties, but no Norfolk manor name is yet extracted.
Later Continuity Evidence: The estate packet can now be reconstructed through five named contexts; Bodleian MS. Ch. Norfolk 339 [corrected Pass 83] adds a surviving 1478 inquisition commission/writ target.
Present Physical Survival: Non-Watlington known contexts; modern physical survival is not used as evidence for Colts recovery.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown / not relevant to the unresolved Norfolk parcel until original return is read.
Known Severance Evidence: No Watlington severance event established; this is medieval inheritance/title-identity reconstruction.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Not directly a 1930 parcel claim. Its recovery value is that the full C140 return may identify the Norfolk lands inherited through Joan into Colt, which can then be compared with the later Colt estate and 1597 conveyance.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: VERY HIGH TITLE-IDENTITY TARGET — MODERN C140 REFERENCE NARROWED; FIVE ESTATE CONTEXTS; EXACT NORFOLK RETURN OUTSTANDING.
Next Decisive Evidence: Retrieve/read C 140/52 complete constituent returns/items (including source-cited /13, status unresolved) -> E149 counterpart -> Norfolk place list -> inspect Bodleian MS Ch Norfolk 339 [corrected Pass 83] -> John Colt C66 livery -> crosswalk to Trusbut fee geography and 1597 Colt estate.
Joan IPM process — corrected Bodleian Ch.339 / John Tymperley Norfolk-Suffolk escheator
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Joan IPM process — corrected Bodleian Ch.339 / John Tymperley Norfolk-Suffolk escheator
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: The 1878 Bodleian calendar and current catalogue correct the Joan writ to Ch./MS. Ch. Norfolk 339 and name John Tymperley junior, escheator of Norfolk and Suffolk, assigned in 15 Edw IV to take the inquisition.
Historic Description / Extent: No Norfolk parcel names in the writ. Existing known IPM property contexts remain Cavendish/Colt's Hall, Clayhall, Suffolks, Boxstead and Peyton/Peytones.
Later Continuity Evidence: VCH Roydon independently cites P.R.O. C 140/52, no.34; Pass-82 C 140/52/13 is no longer treated as final whole-packet mapping. Modern CIPM methodology confirms a joint Norfolk/Suffolk escheator writ can lead to two county inquisitions with uneven survival.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped: exact Norfolk return/estate list still required.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event; this is medieval inheritance/IPM process reconstruction.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: Very high strategic relevance because the new escheator name and corrected shelfmark provide evidence-led routes to the Norfolk/Suffolk returns without repeating genealogy.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: VERY HIGH IPM-PROCESS ADVANCE — NORFOLK/SUFFOLK ESCHEATOR ASSIGNMENT PROVED; LAND LIST UNRESOLVED.
Next Decisive Evidence: MS. Ch. Norfolk 339 -> C 140/52 old no.34 packet -> E149 by John Tymperley/Joan Parre -> separate Norfolk/Suffolk return extraction -> compare Norfolk names to Trusbut fee geography.
Joan Norfolk-return recovery ladder — E152/E153/E136/E357 added
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Joan Norfolk-return recovery ladder — E152/E153/E136/E357 added
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No new Colts parcel is asserted. The gain is evidential: modern IPM editorial practice and TNA guidance identify additional Exchequer/escheator series capable of preserving or reconstructing material missing from Chancery.
Historic Description / Extent: Exact Norfolk land list still unknown. Pass 84 does not add Watlington, Shouldham, Shingham, Holme, Runcton Holme or any other candidate place to Joan's holdings.
Later Continuity Evidence: Concrete control: C 139/99/38 generated separate Suffolk and Norfolk returns under one joint writ; the reference table shows an E149 duplicate for Suffolk but none for Norfolk.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped until Joan's actual Norfolk return/property names are recovered.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event; this is medieval source-survival and inheritance reconstruction.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] High strategic value: if C140 material is incomplete or E149 is negative, E152/E153 and E136/E357 may preserve or reconstruct evidence needed to identify the Norfolk estate transmitted into the Colt line.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: VERY HIGH SOURCE-RECOVERY UPGRADE — NEGATIVE E149 ALONE IS NOT A NORFOLK-RETURN DISPROOF.
Next Decisive Evidence: Request all C 140/52 Joan constituents; search E149 and E152 independently; examine E153 residual files; use E136/E357 escheator account material for John Tymperley junior / 15 Edw IV Norfolk-Suffolk.
Joan IPM exact-item recovery — leading C 140/52/34 mapping + E501/15–18 + early Chancery inventories
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Joan IPM exact-item recovery — leading C 140/52/34 mapping + E501/15–18 + early Chancery inventories
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Published CIPM methodology explicitly maps old Calendarium document numbers into modern file/document references; old 16 Hen VI no.35 becomes C139/86/35. Joan is independently cited as old 15 Edw IV no.34 in piece C140/52. [Inference] C140/52/34 is therefore the leading exact modern item. The same editorial source gives E501/15–18 as the first finding-aid route for E149/E152/E153; archive scholarship adds Trinity MSS61–62 and Rawlinson B.231.
Historic Description / Extent: No new parcel names. Candidate Norfolk places remain unproved: Watlington, Shouldham, Shingham, Holme/Runcton Holme, Tottenhill, Setchey, Fincham, Wiggenhall, Thorpland.
Later Continuity Evidence: This changes the retrieval precision, not the inheritance conclusion: recover the Joan county return first, then compare exact medieval place spellings with the Trusbut fee geography and later Colt estate.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown until the actual county return/title chain is recovered.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event; medieval source-identity reconstruction only.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Very high strategic value because the probable exact C140 item can now be tested directly, while E501 and the early inventories supply independent fallback indexes if Discovery or Exchequer searches fail.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: LEADING EXACT C140 ITEM NARROWED — DIRECT TNA CONFIRMATION STILL REQUIRED; /13 CONFLICT NOT DELETED.
Next Decisive Evidence: Request/check C140/52/34 plus all Joan constituents -> identify what /13 is -> inspect E501/15–18 -> search Trinity MSS61–62 and Rawlinson B.231 -> then E149/E152/E153/E136/E357 -> extract Norfolk land list.
Medieval Trusbut -> Colt bridge — closure at primary-derived level
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Medieval Trusbut -> Colt bridge — closure at primary-derived level
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: 1427 IPM: Thomas Trusbut holds Watlington/Tottenhill/Garbodesthorp/Setchey/?Longham fee. Parkin: Thomas son/heir of Laurence; 1451 will gives Tittleshall and Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey-linked estate to John; Shouldham/Marham to William; William dies s.p.; Jane daughter/heir of John succeeds and marries Thomas Colt; John Colt later has livery of Tittleshall in 1 Hen VII.
Historic Description / Extent: Strong overlapping medieval geography: Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, Shouldham/Garbodesthorp context, Thorpland, Fincham, Holme.
Later Continuity Evidence: Historic England independently states Colt's manor/Trussbutt's was held by the Trussbutts and passed by marriage to Thomas Colt. 1597 HARE 2402 later expressly styles the target Manor of Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped to current cadastral parcels by this medieval chain alone.
Current Registered Owner: Jane/Joan -> Thomas Colt -> John Colt succession materially established at primary-derived level.
Known Severance Evidence: No medieval severance event; this is inheritance/title transmission.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] The 1427 fee and 1451 will estate are not proved parcel-identical, but the transmission into Colt is no longer an unsupported hypothesis.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: CLOSED FOR WORKING TITLE DESCENT — ORIGINAL ALEYN FOL.163 IS THE REMAINING MANUSCRIPT-LEVEL CHECK, NOT A MISSING GENERATIONAL LINK.
Next Decisive Evidence: Order Aleyn fol.163; then compare 1451 premises to HARE 2402/2403 and later parcel records. Do not reopen Joan's IPM as the required inheritance bridge.
Joan no.34 Norfolk-return theory — closed as non-critical / probably false lead
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: Joan no.34 Norfolk-return theory — closed as non-critical / probably false lead
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Rogers genuinely prints Norfolk, but his citation is defective. Rye's Norfolk master index does not expose old 15 Edw IV no.34 or Parr/Colt/Trusbut, while it does contain other genuine 15 Edw IV Norfolk entries.
Historic Description / Extent: No Norfolk parcel from Joan no.34 is accepted.
Later Continuity Evidence: C140/52 /13-versus-/34 remains a source-reference problem only.
Present Physical Survival: Not mapped.
Current Registered Owner: Not needed to prove Jane/Joan's Trusbut-to-Colt inheritance because the 1451/Parkin/HE route supplies it independently.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Best current conclusion: do not presume a lost Norfolk return. If C140 later proves Norfolk content, add it; otherwise the title chain remains closed without it.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: CLOSED AS A BLOCKING ISSUE — NEGATIVE/CONTRADICTED, NOT PROVED NORFOLK.
Next Decisive Evidence: Optional cleanup: inspect C140/52/34 and /13; priority shifts to Aleyn fol.163 and parcel crosswalk rather than further Joan-IPM hunting.
HARE 2826 — Shouldham field book 1440-1 / diagrammatic field-strip maps
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: HARE 2826 — Shouldham field book 1440-1 / diagrammatic field-strip maps
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: Scholarly source identifies HARE 2826 fols.16v,34v as 1440-41 Shouldham plans; NRO institutional report confirms physical field book survives and was conserved.
Historic Description / Extent: Two diagrammatic plans show small groups of field strips; the draft written survey covers substantially more land than the mapped folios.
Later Continuity Evidence: Chronologically contemporary with the Thomas Trusbut era and just before the 1451 testamentary estate; no direct Colts/Trusbut label has yet been extracted from the manuscript.
Present Physical Survival: Original volume physically preserved at Norfolk Record Office; images not yet obtained.
Current Registered Owner: Not applicable / medieval source.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event; spatial identity/source-control only.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Potentially very high value if the written survey or mapped strips name Watlington-linked Trusbut tenants/fields or can be located against later Shouldham parcels; currently not a Colts parcel claim.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: MEDIEVAL SPATIAL CONTROL — SOURCE PHYSICALLY CONFIRMED, MANOR/TENANT IDENTITY UNREAD.
Next Decisive Evidence: Obtain COMPLETE HARE 2826 digital copy including fols.16v/34v and surrounding written survey -> transcribe lord/tenant/field/abuttal names -> compare 1427/1451 Trusbut geography -> then overlay against 1633 HARE 2495 and later maps.
NRO Duties on Land Values local valuation-book route — P/DLV/1 Shouldham target
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: NRO Duties on Land Values local valuation-book route — P/DLV/1 Shouldham target
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts-specific entry read. The evidence is archival: NRO currently uses Duties on Land Values field/valuation books for former-owner/property research, and a separate Norfolk house history demonstrates exact NRO shelfmark form P/DLV/1/52.
Historic Description / Extent: Target should be a c.1910 valuation/Domesday book or schedule for the income-tax parish covering Shouldham, recording hereditament/assessment numbers and property data.
Later Continuity Evidence: Should cross-reference the same Edwardian properties captured by the national IR 127/8 plans and IR 58 field books.
Present Physical Survival: Archive series survives in Norfolk examples; exact Shouldham volume/item not yet identified.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown.
Known Severance Evidence: No severance event is established by the route itself.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] High value because a local valuation book may identify owner/occupier/map reference even before the exact national field book is recovered; any property conclusion requires the actual Shouldham entry.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: CRITICAL LOCAL 1910 OWNERSHIP ROUTE — SERIES FORM PROVED, SHOULDHAM ITEM UNLOCATED.
Next Decisive Evidence: Locate P/DLV/1 item for Shouldham or its income-tax parish -> extract assessment no., owner, occupier, description, map ref, area/value -> match to LVII.7/XLV.16 -> IR 58 -> later HARE/1929-1930 title chain.
1767–1832 Land Tax bridge — Clackclose C/Scd 2 + national IR 23 / redemption follow-through
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 1767–1832 Land Tax bridge — Clackclose C/Scd 2 + national IR 23 / redemption follow-through
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: No Colts-specific assessment entry has yet been read. The new evidence is the survival/retrieval structure: local Clackclose assessments begin in 1767 under NRO C/Scd 2, while TNA IR 23 supplies the near-nationally complete 1798 proprietor/main-tenant return. PASS 108: direct digital access is now verified through Ancestry's IR 23 image collection, with Forebears specifically indexing Land Tax Redemption under Shouldham.
Historic Description / Extent: Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe annual assessment entries; exact property descriptions may be limited. IR 22/IR 24 may add property/tenant detail if tax was redeemed.
Later Continuity Evidence: Directly bridges the 1794–98 enclosure period to the 1811 Hare estate mapping and can then be compared with the 1843 tithe. The 1798 owner/occupier test can now be run directly online before archive-item numbering is solved.
Present Physical Survival: Primary records survive; exact Shouldham entries not yet extracted.
Current Registered Owner: Unknown until the assessment is read.
Known Severance Evidence: The series can reveal proprietor/occupier changes but does not itself prove legal conveyance dates or manor-title ownership.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] If the same Hare proprietor/estate and an identifiable principal tenant persist across 1794–1811 on land that can be matched to Colts Farm, physical-estate continuity strengthens. A different proprietor/occupier pattern may expose an earlier severance or distinct holding.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: CRITICAL PRE-1811 OWNERSHIP/OCCUPATION CROSSWALK — SERIES LOCATED + DIRECT DIGITAL ACCESS VERIFIED; SHOULDHAM ROWS UNREAD.
Next Decisive Evidence: NRO C/Scd 2 Clackclose: extract Shouldham/Thorpe key years 1794–1812 -> TNA IR 23 1798 cross-check -> any IR 22/IR 24 redemption -> HARE 6832 1811 map -> 1843 tithe. PASS 108: search Ancestry UK Land Tax Redemption 1798 directly for Shouldham / Shouldham Thorpe; record proprietor, occupier, assessment and any redemption detail, then cross-check HARE 6832 and 1843 tithe.
2018 Shouldham TPO 2/TPO/00575 — Lynn Road / Westgate Street open-land control
Candidate Parcel / Land Class: 2018 Shouldham TPO 2/TPO/00575 — Lynn Road / Westgate Street open-land control
Positive Colts / Trussbutts Evidence: None. The official record does not name Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts and is retained only as a modern locality/map control.
Historic Description / Extent: Open land north of Lynn Road, south of 10 and east of Westgate Street; two Lime trees covered by the TPO.
Later Continuity Evidence: No historic Colts continuity proved. The council record supplies a modern fixed locality to compare against enclosure, Hare-estate, tithe and valuation mapping.
Present Physical Survival: Modern open-land locality identified by official council committee record; linked map/report route exists.
Current Registered Owner: Not identified in the public committee record.
Known Severance Evidence: None established by this TPO record.
Could It Have Passed in 1930?: [Inference] Only relevant to a 1930 parcel question if an independent historic-map crosswalk later shows that this exact land was a surviving Colts component and remained in the relevant title chain.
Theft / Fraud Evidence: None found.
Current Audit Status: CONTEXT-ONLY MODERN PARCEL CONTROL — NO COLTS OVERLAP OR OWNERSHIP PROVED.
Next Decisive Evidence: Use the official TPO map/report only as a modern geometry layer -> compare with 1794-98 enclosure, HARE 6832, 1843 tithe, 1910 valuation and modern HMLR. Do not promote to a Colts parcel without that crosswalk.
12 Feb 1930 Humphreys -> Edleston conveyance
Record / Parcel: 12 Feb 1930 Humphreys -> Edleston conveyance
Actual record status: RECOVERED — PRIMARY
Evidence recovered: User-supplied deed images analysed in Pass 42/rights project
What it conclusively proves: Humphreys, as beneficial owner for £100, conveyed Watlington; Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham; Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts; and Tottenhill, 'as far as ... subsisting', with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances, in fee simple.
What it does NOT prove: Does not prove that every historic Colts field remained in Humphreys's title or was still a member/appurtenance in 1930.
Remaining exact missing item: None for the deed itself. The genuine predecessor gap is the 16 Dec 1929 deed and the pre-1930 physical parcel chain.
Priority: CLOSED / core evidence
Loop status: CLOSED — DO NOT RE-SEARCH
Source / project evidence: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_5_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0310; Pass 42/77 cumulative handover.
16 Dec 1929 Green + Public Trustee -> Humphreys
Record / Parcel: 16 Dec 1929 Green + Public Trustee -> Humphreys
Actual record status: RECITAL RECOVERED; SEPARATE ORIGINAL NOT SURFACED IN CURRENT PROJECT SEARCH
Evidence recovered: Express recital inside the 12 Feb 1930 primary deed; Pass 97 independent contemporary controls establish J.H.T. Green as a Weatherall & Green property professional; Pass 99 adds a 31 Jul 1897 Morning Post indexed will report naming the exact J.H.T. Green and an Edward Humphreys as separate legatees in the same will. The Edward identity is unresolved. Pass 100 indexed conversation+Library searches using exact parties/date and PDF/image-only filters again did not surface the separate original. Pass 101 title-only Library searching for the Batch-5 project name, the 16 Dec 1929 date and exact parties still did not surface the underlying image/ZIP/conveyance artifact; only cumulative/derived references surfaced. Pass 102 exact public-web searching using the date plus Watlington Gawsells / Trusbutts / Tottenhill / Public Trustee did not surface the separate instrument.
What it conclusively proves: The 1930 recital proves Green + Public Trustee granted to Humphreys in fee simple the hereditaments later conveyed to Edleston, together with other hereditaments. Pass 97 independently proves Green's professional identity/capacity in property work, not his 1929 ownership.
What it does NOT prove: Does not expose the 1929 schedule, parcel descriptions, reservations, root of title, consideration or party capacities. The 1897 newspaper clue does not prove that its Edward Humphreys is the solicitor in the 1913 Spooner/Coote probate network, Mary Rhoda's husband/relative, or connected to Watlington. The fresh negative search does not establish that the user never uploaded the instrument in an earlier unsurfaced image/ZIP batch. Pass 101's negative Library result remains a retrieval limitation, not evidence that the original was never uploaded. This repeated public-index negative is not evidence that the deed is lost or was never supplied privately.
Remaining exact missing item: First re-check prior user image/ZIP/conveyance batches if accessible. If still absent, recover the separate 16 Dec 1929 conveyance. In parallel, identify the 1897 testatrix and the Edward Humphreys legatee before using that network clue for capacity/root-of-title analysis. Do not repeat title-only/index searches unless a new file surface or archive source becomes available.
Priority: CRITICAL
Loop status: OPEN — VERIFY PRIOR UPLOADS BEFORE EXTERNAL RE-RESEARCH
Source / project evidence: WCT-DIG-0316; private 1930 deed recital; WCT-DIG-0469/0470; WCT-DIG-0471; current conversation/library search. Pass 100 current-index negative control added.
27 May 1954 Sarah Edleston personal-representative assent
Record / Parcel: 27 May 1954 Sarah Edleston personal-representative assent
Actual record status: RECOVERED — PRIMARY
Evidence recovered: User-supplied primary assent
What it conclusively proves: Selected Yorkshire manors were assented; Watlington was not included in this selected-manor document.
What it does NOT prove: Does not transfer or define Watlington Colts physical land.
Remaining exact missing item: None for this assent itself.
Priority: CLOSED / negative control
Loop status: CLOSED — DO NOT RE-SEARCH
Source / project evidence: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_1_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0317.
31 May 1966 administration de bonis non
Record / Parcel: 31 May 1966 administration de bonis non
Actual record status: PRIMARY FACT RECITED IN 1977 ASSENT
Evidence recovered: 21 Dec 1977 primary assent expressly recites Eric Holmes + Raine receiving administration of Robert's remaining estate
What it conclusively proves: Establishes the probate-administration gateway used in the 1977 Watlington-Colts assent.
What it does NOT prove: Not a physical-parcel schedule; separate grant image is not required to decide pre-1930 Colts land.
Remaining exact missing item: Separate grant only if probate-file completeness is desired.
Priority: NON-BLOCKING
Loop status: SUBSTANTIVELY CLOSED FOR CURRENT PURPOSE
Source / project evidence: WCT-DIG-0318; 1977 supplied assent.
30 Oct 1969 assent to Richard John Hanby Holmes
Record / Parcel: 30 Oct 1969 assent to Richard John Hanby Holmes
Actual record status: NOT SEPARATELY RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Referenced by second 21 Dec 1977 vesting assent
What it conclusively proves: Shows there was an earlier Sarah-estate vesting step before the residual 1977 sweep.
What it does NOT prove: Does not currently identify which manors were in the 1969 schedule.
Remaining exact missing item: Actual 30 Oct 1969 assent.
Priority: MEDIUM / chain cleanup
Loop status: OPEN BUT NON-BLOCKING FOR LAND
Source / project evidence: Referenced in WCT-DIG-0319 / supplied 1977 vesting assent.
21 Dec 1977 first assent — Robert unadministered estate
Record / Parcel: 21 Dec 1977 first assent — Robert unadministered estate
Actual record status: RECOVERED — PRIMARY
Evidence recovered: User-supplied primary assent
What it conclusively proves: Expressly schedules 'Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts' within the Tottenhill/Watlington manor group and moves it into Eric's Sarah-executor capacity.
What it does NOT prove: Does not identify historic Colts physical parcels or prove they were still attached in 1930.
Remaining exact missing item: None for this assent itself.
Priority: CLOSED / core chain
Loop status: CLOSED — DO NOT RE-SEARCH
Source / project evidence: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_2_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0318.
21 Dec 1977 second vesting assent -> Richard J.H. Holmes
Record / Parcel: 21 Dec 1977 second vesting assent -> Richard J.H. Holmes
Actual record status: RECOVERED — PRIMARY
Evidence recovered: User-supplied primary vesting assent
What it conclusively proves: Vests Cranwich and residual Sarah-estate manors/lordships not already included in the 1969 assent in Richard in fee simple.
What it does NOT prove: Does not identify surviving physical Colts land.
Remaining exact missing item: None for this deed itself; 1969 assent only for completeness.
Priority: CLOSED / core chain
Loop status: CLOSED — DO NOT RE-SEARCH
Source / project evidence: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_4_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0319.
22 May 2017 probate grant — Richard -> Olivia executor authority
Record / Parcel: 22 May 2017 probate grant — Richard -> Olivia executor authority
Actual record status: RECOVERED — PRIMARY
Evidence recovered: User-supplied High Court probate grant
What it conclusively proves: Richard died 20 Nov 2016 and Olivia Mary Holmes received executor/personal-representative authority.
What it does NOT prove: Probate authority alone does not prove beneficial ownership of a physical Colts parcel.
Remaining exact missing item: No probate record needed for the pre-1930 parcel issue. Current transfer is treated under the user's later working premise, not independently re-proved here.
Priority: CLOSED AS AUTHORITY
Loop status: CLOSED — DO NOT RE-SEARCH
Source / project evidence: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_3_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0320.
Current Watlington-West transfer
Record / Parcel: Current Watlington-West transfer
Actual record status: WORKING PREMISE — NOT INDEPENDENTLY RECOVERED HERE
Evidence recovered: User instructed project to treat current transfer as conveying everything still historically associated with Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts
What it conclusively proves: Removes current executed transfer as the project's rights-survival bottleneck.
What it does NOT prove: Does not prove any disputed physical parcel was still attached to the manor in 1930 or today.
Remaining exact missing item: Executed transfer only if independent modern-title proof is later required.
Priority: NON-BLOCKING BY USER INSTRUCTION
Loop status: DO NOT REOPEN UNLESS USER CHANGES PREMISE
Source / project evidence: Pass 16 working-premise section preserved in cumulative handover.
HARE 2495 — 1633 Field Book
Record / Parcel: HARE 2495 — 1633 Field Book
Actual record status: PARTIAL CONTENT RECOVERED VIA HISTORIC ENGLAND; ORIGINAL NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: HE summary identifies capital messuage/Colt's close, four tenements/yards, Alder Carr, Appletons, Batchelors and acreages/relative locations
What it conclusively proves: Establishes a strong positive historic Colts physical parcel inventory.
What it does NOT prove: Does not give complete tenant/abuttal/rent/tenure wording for every parcel.
Remaining exact missing item: Full HARE 2495 original/complete copy if needed for exact parcel boundaries and tenure.
Priority: HIGH
Loop status: OPEN — BUT HISTORIC IDENTITY ALREADY STRONG
Source / project evidence: Historic England NHLE 1020446; NRO HARE 2495.
HARE 6832 — 1811 Map of Estates of Sir Thomas Hare
Record / Parcel: HARE 6832 — 1811 Map of Estates of Sir Thomas Hare
Actual record status: NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Historic England cites it and uses it to state early-19C Colt's Farm included the whole scheduled area Pass 107 adds a quantified predecessor landscape control: the Cooke/Arthur Young enclosure table records Shouldham + Garboiesthorpe at 5,570 acres in 1794. Pass 108 verifies direct digital access to the 1798 Shouldham Land Tax Redemption/IR 23 owner-occupier return, providing a new pre-1811 control immediately before HARE 6832.
What it conclusively proves: Provides published/official evidence of Colt's Farm continuity into early 19C. This helps frame the scale of the landscape restructuring before the 1811 estate map. If the actual 1798 return identifies the same estate proprietor/tenant seen around Colt's Farm, it will materially constrain the 1794->1811 continuity question.
What it does NOT prove: No parcel colours, numbers, field boundaries or ownership legend have been read directly. It does not identify any Hare or Colts allotment and cannot substitute for HARE 6832.
Remaining exact missing item: Actual Shouldham/Colt's Farm section of HARE 6832. Also extract the actual 1798 Shouldham IR 23 owner/occupier rows before interpreting the 1811 estate map.
Priority: CRITICAL
Loop status: OPEN — REAL MISSING RECORD
Source / project evidence: Historic England NHLE 1020446; NRO HARE 6832.
1843 Shouldham tithe map + apportionment
Record / Parcel: 1843 Shouldham tithe map + apportionment
Actual record status: PARCEL NAMES KNOWN; NORFOLK SERIES FIXED; DIRECT SHOULDHAM PARISH-SEARCH ROUTE VERIFIED; ACTUAL PLOT/OWNER/OCCUPIER STILL NOT READ
Evidence recovered: Historic England: Homestall east/southeast of Colt's Hall; Batchelors = Further Homestall. Pass 99 targeted public/TNA searches again failed to surface the exact Shouldham IR 30/IR 29 reference, plot numbers, owner or occupier. Pass 100 independently reverified the live Norfolk County Council ncc_tithe cache architecture/parameters used by WCT-DIG-0450. Pass 101 exact-name searching again independently reached Historic England's 1843 'Homestall' / 'Further Homestall' statement but did not expose the plot number, owner, occupier or exact IR reference. Pass 102 adds a near-date control: the 1835 West Norfolk poll-book index independently records 'Lemmon Charles, Shouldham'. Pass 104 corrects the Lemmon identity control: Discover Downham says Mary Winearls was Charles's first wife (m. Shouldham 1821) and Hannah Dean his second wife, while the Shouldham baptism transcription continues to show farmer Charles + Mary in later 1850s entries. Pass 105 official TNA catalogue controls prove Norfolk apportionments are IR 29/23/[item] and corresponding maps IR 30/23/[same item]. Pass 106 verifies that the current tithe interface permits County/Parish-only searching without a personal name and exposes transcript, original apportionment, map and the TNA piece/sub-piece reference from the result. Pass 107 adds the 1794 combined-enclosure scale of 5,570 acres as a predecessor control. Pass 108 adds a directly searchable 1798 Shouldham owner/occupier control from digitised IR 23, giving an independent predecessor checkpoint before the 1843 tithe.
What it conclusively proves: Creates real 1633 -> 1811 -> 1843 parcel genealogy. It strengthens the dated pre-1843 presence of Charles Lemmon at Shouldham, but not his title to a particular parcel. The early Charles + Mary farmer sequence is now better contextualised, but the post-1840 family identity is not secure enough to substitute for the tithe apportionment. The archive-reference uncertainty is now narrowed from the entire TNA tithe system to Shouldham's final Norfolk item number. The final Shouldham IR item is no longer a prerequisite to accessing the tithe; it can be learned from the returned parish record/map. The quantified enclosure context can be used to sanity-check later parish/farm acreages but supplies no tithe proprietor or plot identity. A 1798 proprietor/main-tenant match cannot replace the tithe but can test whether the later Hare/Lemmon model is already visible before 1811.
What it does NOT prove: No exact tithe plot number, owner, occupier, acreage or use has yet been extracted. The actual target tile image still has not been read, so no plot number or apportionment identity is claimed. Pass 101 did not obtain or read the target tithe tile itself, so the plot number remains unverified. The 1835 poll index does not expose the qualifying property and therefore cannot identify the tithe owner/occupier or prove Colts Hall ownership. No wife chronology, directory label or poll-book entry proves who owned or occupied Homestall/Further Homestall in the 1843 tithe. The later Mary/Hannah conflict prevents treating every Lemmon entry as one continuous household without further primary evidence. It still does not supply Shouldham's final item number or any Colt's Hall/Homestall plot, owner, occupier, acreage or use. Pass 106 still has not opened the actual Shouldham result, so owner/occupier/plot data remain unproved. No part of the 5,570-acre combined enclosure figure is assigned to Colt's Hall, Homestall or Further Homestall without the award/map/apportionment.
Remaining exact missing item: Search the tithe collection directly by County=Norfolk / Parish=Shouldham with personal names blank; inspect transcript/original/map for Colt's Hall, Homestall and Further Homestall; record the returned IR 29/23/[item] and IR 30/23/[same item], exact plot numbers, owner, occupier, acreage and cultivation. Cross-check with NCC L12/R61436/C85456.
Priority: CRITICAL
Loop status: OPEN — REAL MISSING RECORD
Source / project evidence: Historic England + TNA/NRO tithe route. WCT-DIG-0449/0450; Pass 100 current NCC MapServer validation.
HARE 5370 221 X 6 — Wiggins 1849 survey/terrier/valuation
Record / Parcel: HARE 5370 221 X 6 — Wiggins 1849 survey/terrier/valuation
Actual record status: NOT RECOVERED FOR COLTS
Evidence recovered: Exact archive citation independently established
What it conclusively proves: Shows a surviving 1849 Hare-estate terrier/valuation exists at the right date.
What it does NOT prove: No public evidence yet proves Colts Farm is actually listed or gives its tenant/acreage/rent.
Remaining exact missing item: Actual Colts entry, if any, from HARE 5370.
Priority: CRITICAL
Loop status: OPEN — REAL MISSING RECORD
Source / project evidence: NRO HARE 5370 221 X 6; Agricultural History Review citation.
HARE 5466 222 X 5 — Colts Farm schedule
Record / Parcel: HARE 5466 222 X 5 — Colts Farm schedule
Actual record status: COLTS FARM NAME RECOVERED; FULL SCHEDULE NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Official catalogue expressly lists 'Colts Farm in Shouldham' among Hare estate schedules, post-1874 material
What it conclusively proves: Proves a property named Colts Farm remained in Hare estate administration after the reported later title-transition period.
What it does NOT prove: Does not expose tenant, acreage, rent, field list, legal estate or proprietary wording.
Remaining exact missing item: Actual Colts Farm schedule inside HARE 5466.
Priority: ARCHIVE ACCESS
Loop status: FROZEN — PUBLIC/CATALOGUE RESEARCH COMPLETE; REOPEN ONLY WITH ORIGINAL BUNDLE IMAGES/TRANSCRIPT
Source / project evidence: NRO/TNA Discovery HARE 5466 222 X 5.
HARE 6374/6375 + HARE 6956/1-5 — Hare/Hoff exchange
Record / Parcel: HARE 6374/6375 + HARE 6956/1-5 — Hare/Hoff exchange
Actual record status: EXCHANGE EVENT/MAPS IDENTIFIED; OPERATIVE DETAILS NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Catalogue evidence: c.1900 OS sheets marked for land exchange across Shouldham/Thorpe/Marham/Wormegay
What it conclusively proves: Proves a concrete pre-1930 land-exchange/severance event exists in the Hare estate.
What it does NOT prove: Does not show whether any Colts parcel was exchanged or what rights were reserved.
Remaining exact missing item: Full exchange instruments + coloured plans, then overlay Colts/Homestall parcels.
Priority: ARCHIVE ACCESS
Loop status: FROZEN — PUBLIC/CATALOGUE RESEARCH COMPLETE; REOPEN ONLY WITH ORIGINAL EXCHANGE INSTRUMENTS/PLANS
Source / project evidence: NRO HARE 6374/6375; HARE 6956/1-5.
Batchelors / Further Homestall — Village Hall fragment
Record / Parcel: Batchelors / Further Homestall — Village Hall fragment
Actual record status: 1930 TRUST METADATA RECOVERED; OPERATIVE DEED NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Charity Commission: Declaration of Trust dated 7 Jun 1930; HE places Village Hall on eastern end of historic Batchelors-area enclosure; 2024 PC minutes sought deed + LR record
What it conclusively proves: Identifies a precise 1930 legal-document event on a physically matched historic Colts fragment.
What it does NOT prove: Does not show whether the deed conveyed, gifted, leased or merely governed the land.
Remaining exact missing item: Full 7 Jun 1930 trust/governance deed + NRO PD 356/129 + HMLR title/register.
Priority: CRITICAL
Loop status: OPEN — REAL PARCEL-SPECIFIC TEST
Source / project evidence: Charity 304061; NRO PD 356/129; Shouldham PC 18 Mar 2024.
Current HMLR freehold/title coverage of Colts core parcels
Record / Parcel: Current HMLR freehold/title coverage of Colts core parcels
Actual record status: NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Official INSPIRE/SIM/title-search methods identified. WCT-DIG-0467 correctly records the 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall, 21 The Green conservation-area lime-tree entry; WCT-DIG-0468 adds the Borough Council address form '21 Colts Hall' under Eastgate Street (IDox 1480). Pass 101 adds a secondary administrative cross-check: public property indexes independently list the exact postal property as Council Tax Band F and as a house with EPC rating G / potential E / score 15. Pass 102 exact phrase/address searching still did not expose the Borough reference for the separate 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall T1/T2 lime-pollarding entry. Pass 103 establishes the Borough record class/search-channel control: an official Shouldham example is 24/00135/TREECA, while current Planning Committee delegated reports expressly exclude Works to Trees in a Conservation Area from ordinary delegated lists. Pass 104 adds the exact 6 Nov 2025 Shouldham control 25/00257/TREECA (Orchard House, 3 Lynn Road) plus surrounding late-November Borough TREECA examples, confirming the numbering system is active in the correct period.
What it conclusively proves: The modern property is searchable through two official address formulations plus a dated Borough planning event. PASS 98 confirms that 2/TPO/00673 / Grey Poplar is King George Playing Field, not Colts Hall; the exact Colts Hall planning reference is still to be retrieved. The exact modern postal property is independently present in multiple administrative/property datasets. The 2025 Colts Hall entry is therefore properly targeted as a direct tree-notification/TREECA planning-register record rather than an ordinary delegated-planning-list item. The exact Colts Hall number is now tightly targeted to the correct 2025 TREECA data stream, but it remains omitted from the surfaced parish result.
What it does NOT prove: No current legal proprietor, HMLR title number, registration boundary or unregistered gap is proved. The planning index does not itself prove title or identify the proprietor. Council-tax/EPC records do not identify the legal proprietor or freehold boundary. Pass 103 does not recover or infer the exact 2025 TREECA number, applicant, owner or plan. Neighbouring TREECA numbers cannot safely be used to deduce the Colts Hall number.
Remaining exact missing item: Full Borough Council file for the 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall conservation-area lime-tree entry, retrieved by address/date: actual application reference, applicant, plan and any ownership-related declaration actually present; then HMLR register/title plan/index-map search against both 'Colts Hall, 21 The Green, Shouldham, PE33 0BY' and '21 Colts Hall, Eastgate Street, Shouldham'. The secondary administrative address control does not replace HMLR or the full Borough planning file. Exact Borough application reference/full file remains required before any applicant/ownership-certificate inference. Search/request the direct TREECA/tree-notification register by Colts Hall + 21 The Green + 20 Nov 2025 + exact lime-pollarding description; do not repeat ordinary Planning Committee delegated-list searches. Retrieve/click the underlying direct 'View application' target for the 20 Nov 2025 parish entry or query the Borough register directly by exact address/date/description.
Priority: HIGHEST
Loop status: OPEN — REQUIRED TO END MODERN OWNERSHIP QUESTION
Source / project evidence: HM Land Registry INSPIRE/SIM/register/title-plan workflow; WCT-DIG-0467 corrected Pass 98; WCT-DIG-0468.
NHER 4283 / 2001 protection agreement
Record / Parcel: NHER 4283 / 2001 protection agreement
Actual record status: EXISTENCE KNOWN; AGREEMENT/PARTIES NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Norfolk Heritage Explorer says surviving earthworks have been under protection agreement since 2001
What it conclusively proves: Shows protected surviving pasture within the historic Colts landscape.
What it does NOT prove: Does not identify proprietor, occupier, title number or agreement plan publicly.
Remaining exact missing item: Protection agreement + plan + parties; cross-check HMLR.
Priority: HIGH
Loop status: OPEN — MODERN OWNER LEAD
Source / project evidence: Norfolk Heritage Explorer / Historic England designation context.
Total records
Metric: Total records
Value: 480
Very High relevance
Metric: Very High relevance
Value: 134
High relevance
Metric: High relevance
Value: 250
Primary-derived / primary visual
Metric: Primary-derived / primary visual
Value: 326
Direct-access records
Metric: Direct-access records
Value: 480
Current pass
Metric: Current pass
Value: 111
Scope rule: surviving digital copies, full digital texts, scans, or official/substantive digital records that actually mention Watlington–Colts, Trussbutts/Trusbut/Trussebut, Colts, or directly relevant holders/sites. Archive catalogue entries that merely say where a document can be ordered are excluded. Context-only rows are labelled so they cannot be mistaken for direct manor evidence. PLACE-NAME CONTROL: Wallington cum Thorpland is a distinct Norfolk place and must never be normalised to W...
Metric: Scope rule: surviving digital copies, full digital texts, scans, or official/substantive digital records that actually mention Watlington–Colts, Trussbutts/Trusbut/Trussebut, Colts, or directly relevant holders/sites. Archive catalogue entries that merely say where a document can be ordered are excluded. Context-only rows are labelled so they cannot be mistaken for direct manor evidence. PLACE-NAME CONTROL: Wallington cum Thorpland is a distinct Norfolk place and must never be normalised to Watlington without record-specific proof. A source saying only 'Manor of Watlington' is not automatically identified with Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts without independent evidence.
Watlington Colts
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Colts
Notes: Modern/common form
Pass Added: 1
Watlington-Colts
Variant / Search Form: Watlington-Colts
Notes: Modern hyphenated form
Pass Added: 1
Watlington Coltes
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Coltes
Notes: Recorded early-modern form
Pass Added: 1
Watlington Trusbuttes
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Trusbuttes
Notes: Recorded early-modern alias
Pass Added: 1
Watlington Trussbutts
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Trussbutts
Notes: Modernized alias
Pass Added: 1
Watlington Trussbuts
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Trussbuts
Notes: Variant
Pass Added: 1
Watlington Trusbut
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Trusbut
Notes: Variant
Pass Added: 1
Watlington Trussebut
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Trussebut
Notes: Variant
Pass Added: 1
Watlington Trussebute
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Trussebute
Notes: Variant
Pass Added: 1
Watlyngton
Variant / Search Form: Watlyngton
Notes: Medieval spelling; pair with Trusbut/Trussebut/Shouldham/Tottenhill etc. to avoid false positives
Pass Added: 1
Wallyngton
Variant / Search Form: Wallyngton
Notes: Medieval/early-modern form sometimes encountered in Watlington searches. STRICT CAUTION: Norfolk also has the distinct place Wallington cum Thorpland. Treat Wallyngton/Wallington as Watlington only where record-specific context proves it.
Pass Added: 1
Colt's Manor
Variant / Search Form: Colt's Manor
Notes: Shouldham manor form
Pass Added: 1
Colts Manor
Variant / Search Form: Colts Manor
Notes: Variant
Pass Added: 1
Trussbutt's Manor
Variant / Search Form: Trussbutt's Manor
Notes: Shouldham manor form
Pass Added: 1
Trussbuts and Colts Manor
Variant / Search Form: Trussbuts and Colts Manor
Notes: Form appearing in later family-history text
Pass Added: 1
Colt's / Colts
Variant / Search Form: Colt's / Colts
Notes: Capital messuage / close / farm form in field-book and later landscape records
Pass Added: 1
Colts Hall
Variant / Search Form: Colts Hall
Notes: Physical estate/site continuity
Pass Added: 1
Colt's Hall Barn
Variant / Search Form: Colt's Hall Barn
Notes: Physical estate/site continuity
Pass Added: 1
Shuldham
Variant / Search Form: Shuldham
Notes: Tudor spelling appearing in 1587 Royal Letters Patent transcription
Pass Added: 4
Sholdham
Variant / Search Form: Sholdham
Notes: Tudor spelling appearing in 1586 feoffment transcription
Pass Added: 4
Shuldhamthorpe
Variant / Search Form: Shuldhamthorpe
Notes: Tudor concatenated form
Pass Added: 4
Sholdhamthorpe
Variant / Search Form: Sholdhamthorpe
Notes: Tudor concatenated form
Pass Added: 4
Garboysthorpe / Garboise Thorpe
Variant / Search Form: Garboysthorpe / Garboise Thorpe
Notes: Alias of Shouldham Thorpe used in Tudor and enclosure records
Pass Added: 4
Rowghtonholme / Roungton / Runcton Holme
Variant / Search Form: Rowghtonholme / Roungton / Runcton Holme
Notes: Runcton Holme variants in Tudor and later estate records
Pass Added: 4
Thorpeland / Thorpland
Variant / Search Form: Thorpeland / Thorpland
Notes: Territorial variant repeatedly associated with Trusbut/Gawsell estate material
Pass Added: 4
Trusbutes
Variant / Search Form: Trusbutes
Notes: Form used for Tittleshall/Tyttleshall Hall or Trusbutes in 1611 transcript; may be a separate related Trusbut manor
Pass Added: 4
Walyngton
Variant / Search Form: Walyngton
Notes: Spelling in the 1500 and 1504/1507 Gawsell wills
Pass Added: 5
Gawsells M. in Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Gawsells M. in Watlington
Notes: Exact 1857 published court-roll-note wording for the manor held jure uxoris by William Butts
Pass Added: 5
Garbesthorp
Variant / Search Form: Garbesthorp
Notes: Alias Shouldham Thorpe in the 1857 Notes and Queries court-roll notes
Pass Added: 5
Watliugton
Variant / Search Form: Watliugton
Notes: OCR form appearing in the digitised Notes and Queries scan; search-only OCR variant
Pass Added: 5
Gawsel / Gawcell
Variant / Search Form: Gawsel / Gawcell
Notes: Seventeenth-century and variant forms worth searching alongside Gawsell
Pass Added: 5
Thorpelonde / Thorplond
Variant / Search Form: Thorpelonde / Thorplond
Notes: Forms in Gawsell wills for the manor/estate repeatedly linked with Walyngton
Pass Added: 5
Woodlevys / Woodleves
Variant / Search Form: Woodlevys / Woodleves
Notes: Estate element paired with Thorpelonde/Walyngton in Ellen and Thomas Gawsell wills
Pass Added: 5
Wallington cum Thorpland
Variant / Search Form: Wallington cum Thorpland
Notes: DISTINCT Norfolk place from Watlington; never normalise automatically. Important because Gawsell records can mention both.
Pass Added: 6
Garbois-Thorpe
Variant / Search Form: Garbois-Thorpe
Notes: 1845 directory says Shouldham Thorpe was anciently called Garbois-Thorpe; compare Garbesthorp/Garboysthorpe forms.
Pass Added: 6
[Shouldham] Thorpe
Variant / Search Form: [Shouldham] Thorpe
Notes: Open Domesday modern identification used for Domesday entry; search alongside Shouldham Thorpe.
Pass Added: 6
Hare 2826
Variant / Search Form: Hare 2826
Notes: Muniment reference for the 1440–41 Shouldham draft survey/plans cited in History of Cartography.
Pass Added: 6
Gawsels
Variant / Search Form: Gawsels
Notes: Exact manor spelling in White's 1845 and 1883 Watlington entries; search alongside Gawsell/Gawsel but preserve the source spelling.
Pass Added: 7
manor of Gawsels
Variant / Search Form: manor of Gawsels
Notes: Exact 1845/1883 directory phrase for the Watlington lordship and yearly courts leet and baron.
Pass Added: 7
Watlington Hall
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Hall
Notes: Late eighteenth-/nineteenth-century estate-seat search form. Do not treat Hall ownership as automatically identical to manorial lordship.
Pass Added: 7
Thomas Plestow
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Plestow
Notes: 1781 Norfolk Chronicle transcription places Thomas Plestow at Watlington Hall.
Pass Added: 7
Thomas Berners Plestow
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Berners Plestow
Notes: 1818 knighthood and 1819 death records use T. B. / Sir Thomas Berners Plestow of Watlington Hall.
Pass Added: 7
John Davis Plestow
Variant / Search Form: John Davis Plestow
Notes: Alumni Oxonienses: rector and patron of Watlington, 1791–1824; father of Charles Berners Plestow.
Pass Added: 7
Charles Berners Plestow
Variant / Search Form: Charles Berners Plestow
Notes: Before-1830 Watlington Hall provenance; White 1845 names him lord of Gawsels manor.
Pass Added: 7
George Coote / G. Coote
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / G. Coote
Notes: White 1883 names G. Coote of Sudbury as lord of Gawsels in Watlington while the Hall was separately owned.
Pass Added: 7
Watlington Inclosure Act 1748 / 1749
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Inclosure Act 1748 / 1749
Notes: Search both conventional Act year (1748) and the 1749 passing/enclosure chronology; do not confuse title-year with event-year.
Pass Added: 7
Gawecell / Gawesell
Variant / Search Form: Gawecell / Gawesell
Notes: Exact AALT CP40/971 forms in 1505 for Thomas Gawecell of Watlyngton and his executors.
Pass Added: 8
Iwayn / Ewayn
Variant / Search Form: Iwayn / Ewayn
Notes: Dashwood's transcription identifies Ellen Gawsell as daughter of William Iwayn/Ewayn; associated property is in Wallington/Thorpland, not automatically Watlington.
Pass Added: 8
Thomas Shuldham & coparceners
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Shuldham & coparceners
Notes: Exact Henry VI field-book title phrase for a Manor of Watlington; keep separate from Colts/Trussbutts unless independently linked.
Pass Added: 8
Albert Edward Henry Birch / A. E. H. Birch
Variant / Search Form: Albert Edward Henry Birch / A. E. H. Birch
Notes: 1899 Gazette and 1912 Kelly forms for Watlington Hall.
Pass Added: 8
Norfolk LVII.1
Variant / Search Form: Norfolk LVII.1
Notes: OS 25-inch sheet covering Runcton Holme, Watlington and Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen; editions 1884/85, 1904/05 and 1927/28.
Pass Added: 8
Wallyngton + Thorplond
Variant / Search Form: Wallyngton + Thorplond
Notes: When these forms occur together, treat them as the distinct Wallington cum Thorpland context unless independent record-specific evidence proves otherwise.
Pass Added: 8
Gregory Gawsell / Gawsell of Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Gregory Gawsell / Gawsell of Watlington
Notes: 1649–51 deed-enrolments and 1649 sheriffship; search both exact surname and 'of Watlington' styling.
Pass Added: 9
Wattlington + Gregory Gawsell
Variant / Search Form: Wattlington + Gregory Gawsell
Notes: Exact 1651 deed-enrolment spelling; retain as Watlington variant but do not use for Wallington.
Pass Added: 9
Sir Robert Gawsell / Susan Gawsell
Variant / Search Form: Sir Robert Gawsell / Susan Gawsell
Notes: Mid-17th-century Braham baronetage kinship; Sir Robert explicitly styled of Watlington.
Pass Added: 9
Edward Shouldham 1646
Variant / Search Form: Edward Shouldham 1646
Notes: Two-acre charitable close at Watlington; identity with visitation Edward Shuldham remains unproved.
Pass Added: 9
Schuldham of Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Schuldham of Watlington
Notes: Exact spelling/title used by the 1664 Norfolk Visitation extraction; search alongside Shuldham/Shouldham.
Pass Added: 9
Stradsett + Gawsell
Variant / Search Form: Stradsett + Gawsell
Notes: 1649–51 enrolled bargain-and-sale series involving Gregory Gawsell of Watlington.
Pass Added: 9
GAWSELL + Visitation 1563
Variant / Search Form: GAWSELL + Visitation 1563
Notes: Digitised Volume II has 35 indexed GAWSELL occurrences; page-level extraction remains open.
Pass Added: 9
Walyngton + Watlyngton
Variant / Search Form: Walyngton + Watlyngton
Notes: Exact pair occurring in the same 1498 Norfolk final concord; strong control proving the two forms must not be automatically normalised together.
Pass Added: 10
Henry Wyatt / Robert Pynkeney / Watlyngton
Variant / Search Form: Henry Wyatt / Robert Pynkeney / Watlyngton
Notes: 1506 Feet of Fines route for an unnamed Manor of Watlyngton with free fold and St Peter advowson; keep separate from Colts/Gawsels unless independently linked.
Pass Added: 10
Thomas Howard / William Howard / Watlyngton
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Howard / William Howard / Watlyngton
Notes: 1380 Foot of Fine contextual settlement showing independent Howard-associated land at Watlington.
Pass Added: 10
Hare 5185 / Hare 5186 / John Wiggins
Variant / Search Form: Hare 5185 / Hare 5186 / John Wiggins
Notes: 1818 and 1851 Hare estate-plan route covering Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe; direct catalogue map extracts located.
Pass Added: 10
Ricus Gawsett / Watlyngton
Variant / Search Form: Ricus Gawsett / Watlyngton
Notes: Exact Walter Rye subsidy wording, superseding the later 'Hatlington' OCR rendering.
Pass Added: 10
HARE 3080/7 / Easter Term 28 Eliz
Variant / Search Form: HARE 3080/7 / Easter Term 28 Eliz
Notes: 1586 fine: Thomas Gawsell and Richard Godbould plaintiffs; Garboysthorpe and associated lands.
Pass Added: 11
Garboysthorpe + Thomas Gawsell + Richard Godbould
Variant / Search Form: Garboysthorpe + Thomas Gawsell + Richard Godbould
Notes: Search route for the 20 Apr 1586 fine; Garboysthorpe is Shouldham Thorpe context.
Pass Added: 11
Gawsell, at Watlington / Spelman
Variant / Search Form: Gawsell, at Watlington / Spelman
Notes: Exact wording preserved in the digitised House of Gournay quotation of Spelman's History of Sacrilege.
Pass Added: 11
John Betts / Thomas Gawswell / Irmingland 1595
Variant / Search Form: John Betts / Thomas Gawswell / Irmingland 1595
Notes: Secondary digital quotation of a 1595 trust settlement naming Thomas Gawswell of Watlington; underlying instrument remains to be pinned.
Pass Added: 11
Stephen John Pope / Watlington Hall 1966
Variant / Search Form: Stephen John Pope / Watlington Hall 1966
Notes: Official London Gazette name/address form for the 1966 High Sheriff of Norfolk.
Pass Added: 11
E179/238/111 / Watlington rot 2
Variant / Search Form: E179/238/111 / Watlington rot 2
Notes: 1336 fifteenth-and-tenth assessment; official TNA E179 page exposes manuscript image for Watlington and separate Shouldham Thorpe / Wallington-Thorpland entries.
Pass Added: 12
E179/253/35A / Watlington rot 30
Variant / Search Form: E179/253/35A / Watlington rot 30
Notes: 1546 Free and Voluntary Contribution; official TNA E179 page exposes Watlington and Shouldham Thorpe manuscript images.
Pass Added: 12
Thomas Cawsel / Thomas Gawsel monument 1600
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Cawsel / Thomas Gawsel monument 1600
Notes: Historic England uses 'Cawsel'; White 1845/1883 uses 'Gawsel'. Preserve both exact spellings.
Pass Added: 12
Leonardus Buttrs / Leonard Butts / Bromley 1619
Variant / Search Form: Leonardus Buttrs / Leonard Butts / Bromley 1619
Notes: Exact Kent Visitation OCR forms for the Leonard Butts pedigree on p.116.
Pass Added: 12
William Butts / 36 Hele / Garboysthorpe 1626
Variant / Search Form: William Butts / 36 Hele / Garboysthorpe 1626
Notes: PCC probate-calendar route for William Butts, gent., of Thorpe alias Shouldham Thorpe alias Garboysthorpe.
Pass Added: 12
VRSVLA / Ursula Gawsell / Dersingham 1645
Variant / Search Form: VRSVLA / Ursula Gawsell / Dersingham 1645
Notes: Surviving memorial inscription explicitly calls her daughter of Thomas Gawsell of Watlington, armiger.
Pass Added: 12
Wallington & Thorpland / Watlington / Poll 1768
Variant / Search Form: Wallington & Thorpland / Watlington / Poll 1768
Notes: Same poll book prints the two as separate Clackclose sections; strong later place-name control.
Pass Added: 12
William But / Butte / Butts + Gaibesthorp / Garbesthorp
Variant / Search Form: William But / Butte / Butts + Gaibesthorp / Garbesthorp
Notes: Early Butts spellings and Shouldham Thorpe alias forms in the 1857 deed/court-roll notes.
Pass Added: 13
24 Hen VI William But Gaibesthorp
Variant / Search Form: 24 Hen VI William But Gaibesthorp
Notes: Mid-fifteenth-century deed-note route; earliest But/Garbesthorp occurrence currently in the digital ledger.
Pass Added: 13
Foston C.R. + William But
Variant / Search Form: Foston C.R. + William But
Notes: Court-roll route for 21 Edward IV amercement and 3 Henry VIII fealty for a messuage and 12 acres.
Pass Added: 13
John Godesou / Thomas Harple / Edmund Whyte / William Butte
Variant / Search Form: John Godesou / Thomas Harple / Edmund Whyte / William Butte
Notes: 16 Henry VII deed-note concerning three roods of land.
Pass Added: 13
M. of Russell / Garbesthorp / 1612
Variant / Search Form: M. of Russell / Garbesthorp / 1612
Notes: First-court note for a later William Butts; keep Russell distinct from Colts/Gawsells unless independently linked.
Pass Added: 13
Gregory Gawsell / Providence Island / 4 Dec 1630
Variant / Search Form: Gregory Gawsell / Providence Island / 4 Dec 1630
Notes: Grant/patent calendar route placing Gregory in the Providence Island Company.
Pass Added: 13
Edmond Gawsell / mark 105 / alive 1600
Variant / Search Form: Edmond Gawsell / mark 105 / alive 1600
Notes: Separate swan-mark evidence for a son of Thomas Gawsell of Watlington.
Pass Added: 13
Thomas Trussebut / la Trinite / Lynn 1400
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trussebut / la Trinite / Lynn 1400
Notes: Patent Roll licence naming Thomas Trussebut as owner of a Lynn ship; identity with manor holder requires contextual proof.
Pass Added: 14
SC 6/943/13-15 / Watlyngton customary works
Variant / Search Form: SC 6/943/13-15 / Watlyngton customary works
Notes: 1426–29 Stow Bardolph account-roll route recording works from Downham, Wimbotsham and Watlington.
Pass Added: 14
Thomas Trussebutte / 18 Feb 1434 commission
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trussebutte / 18 Feb 1434 commission
Notes: Norfolk Patent Roll inquiry into customs, alien priories, royal lands, fees and advowsons.
Pass Added: 14
Thomas Trusbut esquire / 2 Mar 1442
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trusbut esquire / 2 Mar 1442
Notes: Exact Patent Roll status wording; commission with Heydon, Fyncham and Kervyle.
Pass Added: 14
Thomas Trusbut / Marham to Wygenhale / 1443
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trusbut / Marham to Wygenhale / 1443
Notes: Walls-and-ditches commission in the relevant west-Norfolk Fenland geography.
Pass Added: 14
Thomas Trusbut / Shuldham servauntez / Paston 1450
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trusbut / Shuldham servauntez / Paston 1450
Notes: Original Paston-letter wording tying Trusbut, Kervile and Shuldham servants into the Roydon dispute network.
Pass Added: 14
Sir Robert Riche of Wallington / 1609
Variant / Search Form: Sir Robert Riche of Wallington / 1609
Notes: Contemporary deed quotation; strict Wallington place control, not Watlington.
Pass Added: 14
William Butts of Garbristhorpe / manor of Russell / Godbould will
Variant / Search Form: William Butts of Garbristhorpe / manor of Russell / Godbould will
Notes: 1612/13 probate-transcription route independently corroborating Russell as a separately named Garbristhorpe manor.
Pass Added: 14
Francis Gawdy / swan mark 88 / Earl of Warwick
Variant / Search Form: Francis Gawdy / swan mark 88 / Earl of Warwick
Notes: Material-culture succession statement in the West Norfolk swan-mark study; Wallington context.
Pass Added: 14
Thomas Colt / Henry Sotehill / Warwick 1450 1466
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Colt / Henry Sotehill / Warwick 1450 1466
Notes: Feet of Fines CP 25/1/294/74 no.41; major Neville-Warwick feoffment/legal network.
Pass Added: 15
Thomas Colt / keeper rolls Chancery Ireland / 10 Sep 1464
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Colt / keeper rolls Chancery Ireland / 10 Sep 1464
Notes: Direct Patent Roll office grant; use alongside 1467 William Norys successor entry.
Pass Added: 15
Thomas Herbert / William Norys / Thomas Colt / 1467
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Herbert / William Norys / Thomas Colt / 1467
Notes: Successor-office route tightening Thomas Colt's death/termination-of-office chronology.
Pass Added: 15
Joan Colt Parr / IPM 15 Edw IV 34
Variant / Search Form: Joan Colt Parr / IPM 15 Edw IV 34
Notes: Primary-record route cited by Manors of Suffolk for Joan's death/succession; actual IPM remains to be pinned digitally.
Pass Added: 15
John Colt / manor of Netherhall / mannor of Greyes / 1521
Variant / Search Form: John Colt / manor of Netherhall / mannor of Greyes / 1521
Notes: Exact will-transcription property phrases; do not automatically equate Greyes with Watlington-Colts.
Pass Added: 15
George Colt / Colt Hall / Elizabeth I / 2 Aug 1578
Variant / Search Form: George Colt / Colt Hall / Elizabeth I / 2 Aug 1578
Notes: Folger royal-progress route documenting the Cavendish Colt seat and knighting.
Pass Added: 15
Thomas Colt brass 1467 / MC quater semel
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Colt brass 1467 / MC quater semel
Notes: Modern Essex Archaeology re-reading correcting the traditional 1471 brass date.
Pass Added: 15
Lawrence Trusbut / William Bardolf / 28 Oct 1389
Variant / Search Form: Lawrence Trusbut / William Bardolf / 28 Oct 1389
Notes: Close Roll oath in Chancery; pre-1390 Bardolf–Trusbut administrative connection.
Pass Added: 16
Laurence Trussebut / manor of Westle / 6 Nov 1396
Variant / Search Form: Laurence Trussebut / manor of Westle / 6 Nov 1396
Notes: Fine Roll mainprise for royal custody; separate-manor holder context.
Pass Added: 16
Laurence Trusbut / under-stewardship / September 1397
Variant / Search Form: Laurence Trusbut / under-stewardship / September 1397
Notes: Eight and a Half Hundreds liberty; scholarly PDF cites Cotton manuscript.
Pass Added: 16
Laurence Trussebut / commission of array / Norfolk / 9 Sep 1402
Variant / Search Form: Laurence Trussebut / commission of array / Norfolk / 9 Sep 1402
Notes: Patent Roll royal commission with county elite.
Pass Added: 16
Laurence Trussebut / Elizabeth Scales / Haslingfield / 16 Jul 1403
Variant / Search Form: Laurence Trussebut / Elizabeth Scales / Haslingfield / 16 Jul 1403
Notes: Fine Roll custody of Scales estate and minor heir.
Pass Added: 16
Laurence Trussebut / Dalham / enfeoff / 6 Feb 1404
Variant / Search Form: Laurence Trussebut / Dalham / enfeoff / 6 Feb 1404
Notes: Patent Roll licence for two parts of Dalham manor and advowson.
Pass Added: 16
George Colt / Thomas Shouldham / 1587
Variant / Search Form: George Colt / Thomas Shouldham / 1587
Notes: Historic England official descent date; conflicts with modern 1596 narrative and must remain unresolved until deed located.
Pass Added: 16
Laurence Trussebut / HARE 2683–4 / Shouldham / 1386
Variant / Search Form: Laurence Trussebut / HARE 2683–4 / Shouldham / 1386
Notes: Susan Maddock identifies additions to Trussebut estates in Shouldham; John de Brunham acted as feoffee with several Trussebuts.
Pass Added: 18
Laurence Trussebut / Lynn justice / bishop's steward / 1414
Variant / Search Form: Laurence Trussebut / Lynn justice / bishop's steward / 1414
Notes: Peer-reviewed synthesis adds Lynn justice 1395–1415, bishop's steward by 1414 and borough retainer in the 1390s.
Pass Added: 18
Margery Lok / Trussebut / Shouldham / BL-O-O7
Variant / Search Form: Margery Lok / Trussebut / Shouldham / BL-O-O7
Notes: 1410 will/testament route showing Margery Lok was a Trussebut from Shouldham; Laurence an executor.
Pass Added: 18
HARE 2493 / Laurence Trussebut / 330 acres / Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2493 / Laurence Trussebut / 330 acres / Shouldham
Notes: Estate-extent route: more than 330 acres plus the Trussebut manor at Shouldham.
Pass Added: 18
Robert Trusbut / Worlington / Doke 121 / 1440
Variant / Search Form: Robert Trusbut / Worlington / Doke 121 / 1440
Notes: Testament route for a Trusbut of the Shouldham–Lynn family, made at Lynn 17 May 1440.
Pass Added: 18
George Colt / Elizabeth I / knighted / 1578 / Blomefield
Variant / Search Form: George Colt / Elizabeth I / knighted / 1578 / Blomefield
Notes: Independent digitised progress narrative corroborating George Colt's knighting.
Pass Added: 18
George Colt / Cavendish monument / 1570
Variant / Search Form: George Colt / Cavendish monument / 1570
Notes: 1893 Suffolk Institute transcription of the altar-tomb; conflicts with Folger's 1579 will chronology.
Pass Added: 19
George Colt / Cavendish / Sheriff of Suffolk / 1586
Variant / Search Form: George Colt / Cavendish / Sheriff of Suffolk / 1586
Notes: Suckling sheriff-list route for the later George generation.
Pass Added: 19
George Colt / Netherhall / Rushe Pasture / 1595
Variant / Search Form: George Colt / Netherhall / Rushe Pasture / 1595
Notes: Copinger cites Exchequer deposition, Bury St Edmunds, 38 Elizabeth.
Pass Added: 19
D/P 214/25/11 / George Colt / Henry Colt / Sir George Colt
Variant / Search Form: D/P 214/25/11 / George Colt / Henry Colt / Sir George Colt
Notes: Essex Archives 1601/2 feoffment explicitly explains the later George's descent through Henry from Sir George.
Pass Added: 19
Francis Gawdy / Inner Temple / Chief Justice / DNB
Variant / Search Form: Francis Gawdy / Inner Temple / Chief Justice / DNB
Notes: Digitised national-biography route for Gawdy's legal career and Gawdy–Hatton–Rich family bridge.
Pass Added: 19
Thomas Trusbutt / Thomas Shuldham / peace oath / 1 May 1434
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trusbutt / Thomas Shuldham / peace oath / 1 May 1434
Notes: Patent Roll county list places both names in the same Norfolk statutory peace-oath framework.
Pass Added: 20
Thomas Shuldham / Thomas Depden / Katharine Curteys / Wyrmegey / 1445
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Shuldham / Thomas Depden / Katharine Curteys / Wyrmegey / 1445
Notes: Fine Roll marriage commitment tied to knight service of the honour of Wormegay.
Pass Added: 20
Ela Narburgh / Thomas Shuldham / Henry Spelman / Wyrmegey
Variant / Search Form: Ela Narburgh / Thomas Shuldham / Henry Spelman / Wyrmegey
Notes: Henry VII IPM traces Narburgh inheritance to Thomas Shuldham and states Bardolf/Wormegay tenure.
Pass Added: 20
Charles Shouldham / Thomas Schouldham / Caius / 13 Oct 1595
Variant / Search Form: Charles Shouldham / Thomas Schouldham / Caius / 13 Oct 1595
Notes: Gonville and Caius register: Charles, son of Thomas Schouldham gent., born Shouldham, age 16.
Pass Added: 20
Philip Gawdy / letters / 1579–1616
Variant / Search Form: Philip Gawdy / letters / 1579–1616
Notes: Full digitised Gawdy family correspondence corpus from West Harling/London.
Pass Added: 20
Robert Rich / Frances Hatton / 24 Feb 1605
Variant / Search Form: Robert Rich / Frances Hatton / 24 Feb 1605
Notes: DNB marriage route for the Hatton–Rich stage of the Gawdy family bridge.
Pass Added: 20
D/HH 8/2/86 / R.H. Edleston / manors advowsons / c.1930
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/2/86 / R.H. Edleston / manors advowsons / c.1930
Notes: Durham official catalogue: dedicated typescript listing Edleston's manorial/advowson portfolio near the 1929 Watlington acquisition date.
Pass Added: 21
D/Ed 10/5/163-354 / E.R. Hanby Holmes steward / manorial rights
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/5/163-354 / E.R. Hanby Holmes steward / manorial rights
Notes: 239-folio correspondence series: Holmes as steward to R.H. and Alice Edleston over properties and purchases of manors/manorial rights, 1918-1952.
Pass Added: 21
D/Ed 10/5/355-402 / R.H. Edleston estate / Alice Edleston
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/5/355-402 / R.H. Edleston estate / Alice Edleston
Notes: Post-death estate papers, 1953-55, including solicitor correspondence to Alice about disposal of Robert's shares/property.
Pass Added: 21
D/HH 8/3/139 / executors of Miss Edleston / Holmes Raine
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/3/139 / executors of Miss Edleston / Holmes Raine
Notes: 1956 Durham instrument explicitly names E.R. Hanby Holmes and B.S.L.S. Raine as executors of Miss Edleston.
Pass Added: 21
Bertram Stephen Liddon Surtees Raine / 16 Jun 1971 / Gazette
Variant / Search Form: Bertram Stephen Liddon Surtees Raine / 16 Jun 1971 / Gazette
Notes: Official London Gazette estate notice; endpoint for Sarah Edleston's co-executor.
Pass Added: 21
Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / 16 Feb 1981 / Richard John Hanby Holmes / Gazette
Variant / Search Form: Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / 16 Feb 1981 / Richard John Hanby Holmes / Gazette
Notes: Official London Gazette notice names Richard John Hanby Holmes among Eric's personal representatives.
Pass Added: 21
Richard John Hanby Holmes / Cleatlam / Stainton / 1 Aug 1972
Variant / Search Form: Richard John Hanby Holmes / Cleatlam / Stainton / 1 Aug 1972
Notes: 2016 public-register-derived report documents Richard's other manorial/village-green ownership and Andrew Hanby Holmes's title sale.
Pass Added: 21
D/HH 8/2/39 / Edleston / five Norfolk manors / £75 / 6 Jan 1925
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/2/39 / Edleston / five Norfolk manors / £75 / 6 Jan 1925
Notes: Exact Durham parchment conveyance immediately preceding the reported 1929 Watlington acquisition.
Pass Added: 22
D/HH 8/2/40-42 / George Richard Gent / Mundford courts / 1925
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/2/40-42 / George Richard Gent / Mundford courts / 1925
Notes: Steward appointment and printed court notices showing Edleston operating newly purchased Norfolk manors.
Pass Added: 22
D/HH 8/2/51-83 / Lynford plan / purchase manorial rights / 1924-1928
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/2/51-83 / Lynford plan / purchase manorial rights / 1924-1928
Notes: Colour estate plan plus 35 papers of Edleston-Hanby Holmes-solicitor correspondence.
Pass Added: 22
D/Ed 10/3/187-212 / North Runcton Hardwick Setchley
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/187-212 / North Runcton Hardwick Setchley
Notes: Edleston administration correspondence, 1921 admission and 1749 copy court roll in nearby west Norfolk.
Pass Added: 22
D/HH 2/7/2041 / North Runcton / R.H. Edleston trustee
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 2/7/2041 / North Runcton / R.H. Edleston trustee
Notes: Estate book with will, deed schedules, accounts and valuations, 1913-1934.
Pass Added: 22
D/Ed 10/3/265-267 / Wiggenhall Old Vicarage
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/265-267 / Wiggenhall Old Vicarage
Notes: 1945-47 rent/letting papers for Wiggenhall St Peter in the Edleston collection.
Pass Added: 22
D/Ed 18/9/1-131 / R.H. Edleston / Alice Edleston portraits
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 18/9/1-131 / R.H. Edleston / Alice Edleston portraits
Notes: 131 surviving family photographs; online metadata, individual remote image files not yet verified.
Pass Added: 22
D/Ed 18/9/381-403 / Ivy House North Runcton
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 18/9/381-403 / Ivy House North Runcton
Notes: 23 photographs including Edleston family/friends at Ivy House, North Runcton.
Pass Added: 22
D/Ed 18/9/1194-1237 / Norfolk photographs / North Runcton
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 18/9/1194-1237 / Norfolk photographs / North Runcton
Notes: 44 place photographs including North Runcton, Sandringham, Ringstead, Hunstanton and others.
Pass Added: 22
D/Ed 18/9/1378-1386 / R.H. Edleston glass negatives
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 18/9/1378-1386 / R.H. Edleston glass negatives
Notes: Nine glass negatives; catalogue specifically mentions R.H. Edleston and a lady by memorial.
Pass Added: 22
D/Ed 16/49-259 / R.H. Edleston diaries / 1929
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 16/49-259 / R.H. Edleston diaries / 1929
Notes: 1887-1952 diary corpus; priority target for contemporary Watlington acquisition evidence.
Pass Added: 22
D/HH 8/2/18-20 / Manor Ellington / Edleston / Hanby Holmes / £20 / 1950
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/2/18-20 / Manor Ellington / Edleston / Hanby Holmes / £20 / 1950
Notes: Late Edleston manor purchase: conveyance, Hanby Holmes bill of costs and 1838-1950 deed schedule.
Pass Added: 23
D/HH 8/2/43-50 / Mundford manor courts / common rights / Lynford rental
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/2/43-50 / Mundford manor courts / common rights / Lynford rental
Notes: Operational Norfolk manorial notes, agendas, rights notes and 1925-26 court newspaper cuttings.
Pass Added: 23
D/HH 8/3/397 / late R.H. Edleston / fee farm rents / 3 Mar 1966
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/3/397 / late R.H. Edleston / fee farm rents / 3 Mar 1966
Notes: 68-paper correspondence file continuing estate administration to weeks before the May 1966 transition.
Pass Added: 23
D/HH 8/3/50 / Hanby Holmes / Raine / 1957 conveyance
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/3/50 / Hanby Holmes / Raine / 1957 conveyance
Notes: Post-Sarah joint property disposal by the same pair independently documented as her executors.
Pass Added: 23
Robert Holmes Edleston / Riedelski-Piast / photograph
Variant / Search Form: Robert Holmes Edleston / Riedelski-Piast / photograph
Notes: Actual online historical photograph; Edleston identified on the right.
Pass Added: 23
D/Ed 16/260-267 / R.H. Edleston expenditure / 1929
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 16/260-267 / R.H. Edleston expenditure / 1929
Notes: 373 folios, 1920-45; critical target for 1929 acquisition payment/legal costs.
Pass Added: 23
D/Ed 16/268-276 / Alice Edleston notebooks / 1929
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 16/268-276 / Alice Edleston notebooks / 1929
Notes: Nine diary/memorandum/account volumes spanning the reported Watlington acquisition.
Pass Added: 23
North Runcton Parish Council / John Hanby Holmes / former Lord / Dec 2016
Variant / Search Form: North Runcton Parish Council / John Hanby Holmes / former Lord / Dec 2016
Notes: Official 2017 minutes; preserve exact name as printed and do not assume identity.
Pass Added: 23
Edleston Archive at Durham / Monumental Brass Society Bulletin 122
Variant / Search Form: Edleston Archive at Durham / Monumental Brass Society Bulletin 122
Notes: Direct downloadable PDF describing D/Ed 15/7 archive material and item ranges.
Pass Added: 24
D/Ed 15/7/268-309 / Norfolk with Suffolk / Edleston
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 15/7/268-309 / Norfolk with Suffolk / Edleston
Notes: Explicit Norfolk/Suffolk monumental-inscription block in the surviving Edleston research archive.
Pass Added: 24
Society of Antiquaries / Robert Holmes Edleston / 1902
Variant / Search Form: Society of Antiquaries / Robert Holmes Edleston / 1902
Notes: Direct public-domain Proceedings PDF recording his election.
Pass Added: 24
Society of Antiquaries / Edleston / Gainford / Bishopthorpe / 1914
Variant / Search Form: Society of Antiquaries / Edleston / Gainford / Bishopthorpe / 1914
Notes: Direct scanned membership list and contemporary address.
Pass Added: 24
Society of Antiquaries / Edleston / Gainford / Bishopthorpe / 1919
Variant / Search Form: Society of Antiquaries / Edleston / Gainford / Bishopthorpe / 1919
Notes: Direct scanned membership list immediately before Buckden acquisition phase.
Pass Added: 24
Napoleon III and Italy / Robert Holmes Edleston / free ebook
Variant / Search Form: Napoleon III and Italy / Robert Holmes Edleston / free ebook
Notes: Digitised Google Books/Google Play content authored by Edleston.
Pass Added: 24
Friends of Buckden Towers / Edleston / old pictures
Variant / Search Form: Friends of Buckden Towers / Edleston / old pictures
Notes: Actual historical gallery including pre-restoration view tied to Edleston's reconstruction.
Pass Added: 24
Buckden Brittens / Robert Holmes Edleston / 1920 / court rolls
Variant / Search Form: Buckden Brittens / Robert Holmes Edleston / 1920 / court rolls
Notes: Digital local history: Edleston lordship and manor courts; surviving rolls in Huntingdonshire Archives.
Pass Added: 24
D/Ed 10/4/35-673 / Buckden estate / 677 folios
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/4/35-673 / Buckden estate / 677 folios
Notes: Massive Buckden administration correspondence corpus, 1919-1954.
Pass Added: 25
D/Ed 10/4/704-705 / Hail Weston court roll / 1928 / 1929
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/4/704-705 / Hail Weston court roll / 1928 / 1929
Notes: Four-folio rough manor-court roll including 3 Dec 1929.
Pass Added: 25
KHAC1/1300 / Edleston papers / Hail Weston / Buckden Brittens / Eynesbury
Variant / Search Form: KHAC1/1300 / Edleston papers / Hail Weston / Buckden Brittens / Eynesbury
Notes: Independent Cambridgeshire Archives Edleston manorial-paper deposit.
Pass Added: 25
Alice Edleston / Buckden Towers / gift / 1952 / parish council
Variant / Search Form: Alice Edleston / Buckden Towers / gift / 1952 / parish council
Notes: Direct downloadable local-government PDF documenting post-Robert property disposition.
Pass Added: 25
EAW050885 / Buckden Palace / 1953
Variant / Search Form: EAW050885 / Buckden Palace / 1953
Notes: Britain from Above actual aerial image at the Edleston estate transition.
Pass Added: 25
Robert Holmes Edleston / Napoleon platinotype / 1899 / handwritten
Variant / Search Form: Robert Holmes Edleston / Napoleon platinotype / 1899 / handwritten
Notes: Actual photographed object carrying Edleston's autograph provenance statement.
Pass Added: 25
Hail Weston / Robert Holmes Edleston / bought manor / 1920
Variant / Search Form: Hail Weston / Robert Holmes Edleston / bought manor / 1920
Notes: Official parish-council acquisition statement.
Pass Added: 25
D/HH 8/2/84-85 / Chesterton / extinguishment manorial incidents
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/2/84-85 / Chesterton / extinguishment manorial incidents
Notes: Rights/incident extinguishment schedule and Hanby Holmes correspondence.
Pass Added: 25
D/HH 8/2/2-16 / Pertenhall / purchase / Hanby Holmes
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/2/2-16 / Pertenhall / purchase / Hanby Holmes
Notes: 15-paper Edleston-Hanby Holmes manor acquisition file, 1923-25.
Pass Added: 25
D/Ed 14/5/1-127 / Teesdale Record Society group photograph / Edleston Holmes Raine
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 14/5/1-127 / Teesdale Record Society group photograph / Edleston Holmes Raine
Notes: One surviving named photograph contains R.H. Edleston, Miss Edleston, E.R. Hanby Holmes and B. Surtees Raine together.
Pass Added: 26
D/X 332/582 / Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston obituary / 1956
Variant / Search Form: D/X 332/582 / Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston obituary / 1956
Notes: Raine manuscript prepared at Society of Antiquaries Newcastle request for 1956 publication.
Pass Added: 26
D/X 332/584 / Alice Edleston notebook / photographs
Variant / Search Form: D/X 332/584 / Alice Edleston notebook / photographs
Notes: Leather notebook with document transcripts, monumental inscriptions and photographs.
Pass Added: 26
GB-0033-SRA / Surtees Raine manuscripts / Alice Edleston
Variant / Search Form: GB-0033-SRA / Surtees Raine manuscripts / Alice Edleston
Notes: Durham University collection; Alice gave some manuscripts and bequeathed Raine his Gainford house.
Pass Added: 26
D/HH 4/1/536 / Hanby Holmes / extinguishment manorial incidents / 1933
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 4/1/536 / Hanby Holmes / extinguishment manorial incidents / 1933
Notes: Item-level legal record for compensation on extinguished customary manorial incidents.
Pass Added: 26
D/MOB 1/39 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / steward / c1918
Variant / Search Form: D/MOB 1/39 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / steward / c1918
Notes: Formal appointment/minutes for Holmes as manorial steward.
Pass Added: 26
D/Ed 10/3/289-311 / Court Leet Court Baron / Bowes
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/289-311 / Court Leet Court Baron / Bowes
Notes: 23 printed manor-court notices with income/expenditure, 1923-1952.
Pass Added: 26
NAM 2010-02-1 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes papers
Variant / Search Form: NAM 2010-02-1 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes papers
Notes: Separate National Army Museum primary-paper archive, 1913-1941.
Pass Added: 26
NAM 2010-02-8 / Eric Hanby Holmes photographs / 2010-02-2 maps
Variant / Search Form: NAM 2010-02-8 / Eric Hanby Holmes photographs / 2010-02-2 maps
Notes: Independent visual/cartographic archive: photographs plus 32 maps.
Pass Added: 26
NAM 2005-04-59 / Eric Hanby Holmes jerkin
Variant / Search Form: NAM 2005-04-59 / Eric Hanby Holmes jerkin
Notes: Surviving museum object associated with Holmes.
Pass Added: 26
Robert Holmes Edleston / probate / £58,241 15s 5d / Sarah Alice
Variant / Search Form: Robert Holmes Edleston / probate / £58,241 15s 5d / Sarah Alice
Notes: Probate-derived digital estate value and beneficiary marker.
Pass Added: 27
Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston / probate / £131,675
Variant / Search Form: Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston / probate / £131,675
Notes: Probate-derived estate-value marker for the 1956 Holmes/Raine administration.
Pass Added: 27
D/Ed 14/2/1-132 / 33 photographs / Society Antiquaries Newcastle / Edleston
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 14/2/1-132 / 33 photographs / Society Antiquaries Newcastle / Edleston
Notes: Correspondence to Robert/Alice plus 33 outing photographs.
Pass Added: 27
D/DLI 7/288/1-13 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / report / uniform estimate
Variant / Search Form: D/DLI 7/288/1-13 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / report / uniform estimate
Notes: Item-level The Story pages for Eric's surviving military papers.
Pass Added: 27
NAM 2005-03-11 to 2005-03-18 / Richard John Hanby Holmes
Variant / Search Form: NAM 2005-03-11 to 2005-03-18 / Richard John Hanby Holmes
Notes: National Service helmet, respirator, nets, kitbag, webbing, anklets and spectacles.
Pass Added: 27
NAM 2007-02-53 / Richard John Hanby Holmes / Chilworth
Variant / Search Form: NAM 2007-02-53 / Richard John Hanby Holmes / Chilworth
Notes: RAOC brass buttons and service detail that Richard ran a depot at Chilworth.
Pass Added: 27
Teesdale Record Society Volume 8 / Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston
Variant / Search Form: Teesdale Record Society Volume 8 / Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston
Notes: Who Was Who in Teesdale biographical article, 2000.
Pass Added: 27
Teesdale Record Society Volume 9 / Robert Holmes Edleston
Variant / Search Form: Teesdale Record Society Volume 9 / Robert Holmes Edleston
Notes: Who Was Who in Teesdale biographical article, 2001.
Pass Added: 27
Richard John Hanby Holmes / Olivia Mary Carruthers / 1961
Variant / Search Form: Richard John Hanby Holmes / Olivia Mary Carruthers / 1961
Notes: Secondary digital family bridge and children.
Pass Added: 27
Companies House / Richard John Hanby Holmes / solicitor
Variant / Search Form: Companies House / Richard John Hanby Holmes / solicitor
Notes: Official modern identity/professional record.
Pass Added: 27
D/MOB 3/3 / E.R. Hanby Holmes estate book / 1925
Variant / Search Form: D/MOB 3/3 / E.R. Hanby Holmes estate book / 1925
Notes: Detailed steward's estate book: properties, boundaries, bye-laws, encroachments, stints, tithes and document lists.
Pass Added: 28
D/MOB 3/195 / E.R. Hanby Holmes diary attendance / 1926-1964
Variant / Search Form: D/MOB 3/195 / E.R. Hanby Holmes diary attendance / 1926-1964
Notes: Professional steward diary/attendance files spanning Robert and Sarah Edleston succession years.
Pass Added: 28
D/MOB 3/197-198 / Hanby Holmes steward letter books
Variant / Search Form: D/MOB 3/197-198 / Hanby Holmes steward letter books
Notes: Two outgoing letter books, 1930-1940.
Pass Added: 28
D/MOB 1/42 / successor steward / 20 Sep 1966
Variant / Search Form: D/MOB 1/42 / successor steward / 20 Sep 1966
Notes: Appointment of John Carlisle Nanson Donald provides terminus for Eric's formal Bowes stewardship.
Pass Added: 28
D/HH 8/3/22-27 / Bolam / Edleston / Hanby Holmes costs / 1928
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/3/22-27 / Bolam / Edleston / Hanby Holmes costs / 1928
Notes: Complete acquisition-pattern file immediately before 1929.
Pass Added: 28
D/HH 8/3/375-378 / 1929 fee farm purchase / requisitions title
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/3/375-378 / 1929 fee farm purchase / requisitions title
Notes: Purchase agreement, conveyance, completion statement, Eric's costs and title requisitions in 1929.
Pass Added: 28
D/HH 8/3/382-397 / fee farm rents / 1965 / 1969-1976
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/3/382-397 / fee farm rents / 1965 / 1969-1976
Notes: Critical surviving post-Edleston administrative records crossing 1966 and 1969 and nearing 1977.
Pass Added: 28
D/Ed 10/3/213-228 / Chesterton / manorial incidents / 1927-1929
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/213-228 / Chesterton / manorial incidents / 1927-1929
Notes: 27 folios of Edleston-Hanby Holmes rights correspondence terminating in acquisition year.
Pass Added: 28
Law Directory 1915 / Hanby-Holmes Eric Richard / GPO
Variant / Search Form: Law Directory 1915 / Hanby-Holmes Eric Richard / GPO
Notes: Actual scanned professional listing.
Pass Added: 28
Gazette 1939 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / sole executor
Variant / Search Form: Gazette 1939 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / sole executor
Notes: Direct official probate notice.
Pass Added: 28
Gazette 1941 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / John Hall probate
Variant / Search Form: Gazette 1941 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / John Hall probate
Notes: Direct official probate notice naming Eric as co-executor.
Pass Added: 28
Gazette 1968 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / personal representative
Variant / Search Form: Gazette 1968 / Eric Richard Hanby Holmes / personal representative
Notes: Direct official evidence Eric remained active after 1966.
Pass Added: 28
John Hanby Holmes / 28-4-1934 / 20-11-2016
Variant / Search Form: John Hanby Holmes / 28-4-1934 / 20-11-2016
Notes: Exact-date identity control linking parish-council 'John' with Richard John Hanby Holmes.
Pass Added: 28
D/HH 8/3/70-102 / Sarah Alice Edleston / title requisitions / 1923
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/3/70-102 / Sarah Alice Edleston / title requisitions / 1923
Notes: Full independent Sarah acquisition file with conveyance, plan, abstract, requisitions, completion, costs and correspondence.
Pass Added: 29
D/HH 8/3/108-119 / Sarah Alice Edleston / deeds / 1937-1938
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/3/108-119 / Sarah Alice Edleston / deeds / 1937-1938
Notes: Further Sarah acquisitions, title requisitions, costs, solicitor letters and deed schedule.
Pass Added: 29
D/HH 8/3/120-121 / Sarah Alice / title / 1953-1954
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/3/120-121 / Sarah Alice / title / 1953-1954
Notes: Post-Robert title requisitions and conveyance in Sarah's name.
Pass Added: 29
D/HH 8/3/138 / Gainford House / Feb-May 1956
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 8/3/138 / Gainford House / Feb-May 1956
Notes: Immediate post-Sarah letting correspondence, property description and plan.
Pass Added: 29
D/Ed 10/3/275 / Alice Edleston / Wakefield / manorial incidents
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/275 / Alice Edleston / Wakefield / manorial incidents
Notes: Direct letter to Alice concerning extinguishment of manorial incidents.
Pass Added: 29
D/Ed 10/3/288 / miscellaneous rough notes concerning manors
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/288 / miscellaneous rough notes concerning manors
Notes: Twelve unindexed folios; critical hidden-Watlington search target.
Pass Added: 29
D/Ed 10/3/231-236 / Burgh Hall / purchase / 1927
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/231-236 / Burgh Hall / purchase / 1927
Notes: Six-folio Edleston-Hanby Holmes manor-purchase correspondence.
Pass Added: 29
D/Ed 10/3/237-247 / Glatton Holme / manorial incidents
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/237-247 / Glatton Holme / manorial incidents
Notes: Fifteen-folio rights-extinguishment correspondence, 1930-38.
Pass Added: 29
D/Ed 10/3/320-341 / profits paid to Edlestons / 1931-1955
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/320-341 / profits paid to Edlestons / 1931-1955
Notes: Twenty-two printed folios showing continuing manorial profits through Sarah's last full year.
Pass Added: 29
D/Ed 10/3/342-354 / R.H. Edleston / jury summonses
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/342-354 / R.H. Edleston / jury summonses
Notes: Thirteen surviving manor-court jury summonses, 1923-43.
Pass Added: 29
D/Ed 10/3/357-373 / Hanby Holmes Edleston / Bowes / 1952
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/357-373 / Hanby Holmes Edleston / Bowes / 1952
Notes: Direct manor correspondence through 3 Sep 1952, immediately before Robert's death.
Pass Added: 29
Bowes Museum / Alice Edleston / estate clearance / 1953
Variant / Search Form: Bowes Museum / Alice Edleston / estate clearance / 1953
Notes: Museum images plus Alice's quoted letter while clearing Robert's estate.
Pass Added: 29
Bowes Museum / CST.140 / Alice Edleston / 1954
Variant / Search Form: Bowes Museum / CST.140 / Alice Edleston / 1954
Notes: Actual photographs of surviving carriage boots donated by Alice.
Pass Added: 29
E-CIPM 18-793 / Laurence Trussebute / Watlington / Wallington
Variant / Search Form: E-CIPM 18-793 / Laurence Trussebute / Watlington / Wallington
Notes: 1403 same-record tenure and place-name-control search; yielded separate Watlington and Wallington/Thorpland fee lines.
Pass Added: 30
John Trusbut / mercer / 1437 / Stow / Mercers Hall
Variant / Search Form: John Trusbut / mercer / 1437 / Stow / Mercers Hall
Notes: Direct Stow scan + MoEML index; retained only as identity-unproved Trusbut mercantile context.
Pass Added: 30
Trusbot Trusbut / Borromei / 1437-1439 / London mercer
Variant / Search Form: Trusbot Trusbut / Borromei / 1437-1439 / London mercer
Notes: Digitised scholarly account-ledger analysis; £108.13 turnover with Robert Baron; identity to Norfolk family unproved.
Pass Added: 30
Watlington Hall Estate / sale particulars / 1869 / forty-eight lots
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Hall Estate / sale particulars / 1869 / forty-eight lots
Notes: Cambridge ArchiveSearch exact surviving 1869 sale-particulars target; current index surfaces 4 Aug 1869, while Pass 30 captured 29 Sep 1869. Date conflict retained.
Pass Added: 30
Watlington Hall Estate / Plestow / Coote / 1869
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Hall Estate / Plestow / Coote / 1869
Notes: No substantive digital result yet naming purchaser; 1869 sale particulars remain the priority retrieval document.
Pass Added: 30
R.H. Edleston / Watlington / 1929 / manor
Variant / Search Form: R.H. Edleston / Watlington / 1929 / manor
Notes: No new independent public digital Watlington-specific acquisition instrument located in Pass 30.
Pass Added: 30
George Reid senior / Watlington Hall / rented / UCL
Variant / Search Form: George Reid senior / Watlington Hall / rented / UCL
Notes: UCL LBS profile explicitly states George Reid senior rented Watlington Hall; retained as tenancy/occupancy control, not title evidence.
Pass Added: 31
George Reid junior / Watlington Hall / 1805 / Louisa Oakeley
Variant / Search Form: George Reid junior / Watlington Hall / 1805 / Louisa Oakeley
Notes: UCL LBS profile gives 1805 marriage/source bridge and identifies him as son of George Reid of Watlington Hall.
Pass Added: 31
George Reid 1808-1845 / Watlington Hall / Westminster / 1821
Variant / Search Form: George Reid 1808-1845 / Watlington Hall / Westminster / 1821
Notes: Official Westminster School authority record independently styles his father George Reid of Watlington Hall.
Pass Added: 31
Georgina Anne Reid / Watlington Hall / Gresley / 1831
Variant / Search Form: Georgina Anne Reid / Watlington Hall / Gresley / 1831
Notes: Scan-backed historical peerage corroborates the Reid family Watlington Hall designation; posthumous style, not 1831 occupancy proof.
Pass Added: 31
Greg Gansel / Watlington / Sir Ralph Hare / 1660 / Thorowgood / Restituta
Variant / Search Form: Greg Gansel / Watlington / Sir Ralph Hare / 1660 / Thorowgood / Restituta
Notes: Internet Archive full text reproduces 25 Jun 1660 dedication listing Sir Ralph Hare and Greg. Gansel of Watlington together.
Pass Added: 31
Hare / Plestow / Watlington / 1760-1781 / Gawsels
Variant / Search Form: Hare / Plestow / Watlington / 1760-1781 / Gawsels
Notes: Focused renewal did not locate a substantive public digital conveyance establishing the exact Hare-estate → Plestow transfer; remains a critical gap.
Pass Added: 31
George Coote / Watlington / 1869-1883 / Gawsels
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / Watlington / 1869-1883 / Gawsels
Notes: No new pre-1883 digital instrument naming Coote as purchaser/lord located; the 1869 sale particulars remain the priority retrieval target, with 4 Aug / 29 Sep 1869 date conflict retained.
Pass Added: 31
R.H. Edleston / Watlington / 1929 / manor / conveyance
Variant / Search Form: R.H. Edleston / Watlington / 1929 / manor / conveyance
Notes: Focused renewal did not locate a new independent public Watlington-specific purchase instrument; Durham 1929 analogues and hidden-manor targets remain priorities.
Pass Added: 31
Sir Thomas Berners Plestow / lord manor Watlington Tottenhill / Church Heraldry Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: Sir Thomas Berners Plestow / lord manor Watlington Tottenhill / Church Heraldry Norfolk
Notes: Farrer scan explicitly transcribes the Watlington memorial styling Sir Thomas 'many years Lord of the manor of Watlington and Tottenhill'; 17 Feb 1819 memorial date retained alongside the 18 Feb chronology.
Pass Added: 32
RIBA31589 / Watlington Hall / Charles Berners Plestow / front elevation proposed
Variant / Search Form: RIBA31589 / Watlington Hall / Charles Berners Plestow / front elevation proposed
Notes: RIBA indexes the surviving proposed front elevation; exact indexed subject date was not surfaced.
Pass Added: 32
RIBA31591 / Watlington Hall / Charles Berners Plestow / front elevation executed
Variant / Search Form: RIBA31591 / Watlington Hall / Charles Berners Plestow / front elevation executed
Notes: RIBA indexes the surviving executed front elevation; exact indexed subject date was not surfaced.
Pass Added: 32
RIBA95188 / Watlington Hall / stables / 1825
Variant / Search Form: RIBA95188 / Watlington Hall / stables / 1825
Notes: RIBA indexes the ground-floor stables plan with Subject Date 1825.
Pass Added: 32
W J Donthorn / Watlington Hall / Charles Berners Plestow / 1825
Variant / Search Form: W J Donthorn / Watlington Hall / Charles Berners Plestow / 1825
Notes: Discover Downham gives the Donthorn attribution; RIBA independently confirms surviving Plestow Hall drawings.
Pass Added: 32
Charles Berners Plestow / Morning Post / Watlington Hall / 1849
Variant / Search Form: Charles Berners Plestow / Morning Post / Watlington Hall / 1849
Notes: Direct newspaper clipping mirror states death 30 May 1849 at his seat, Watlington Hall.
Pass Added: 32
Charles Berners Plestow / Downham Union / 24 Aug 1836
Variant / Search Form: Charles Berners Plestow / Downham Union / 24 Aug 1836
Notes: Discover Downham PDF transcribes his unanimous election as first chairman of the Board of Guardians.
Pass Added: 32
Watlington Hall Estate / Cambridge ArchiveSearch / 1869-08-04 / forty-eight lots
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Hall Estate / Cambridge ArchiveSearch / 1869-08-04 / forty-eight lots
Notes: Current Cambridge indexed result for the exact sale-particulars object surfaces 4 Aug 1869.
Pass Added: 32
Watlington Hall Estate / 29 Sep 1869 / date conflict
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Hall Estate / 29 Sep 1869 / date conflict
Notes: Pass 30 captured 29 Sep 1869 for the same target; both dates retained pending direct inspection.
Pass Added: 32
George Coote / Watlington / 1869-1883 / purchase / lord
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / Watlington / 1869-1883 / purchase / lord
Notes: Renewed search still did not locate a pre-1883 substantive public purchase/title instrument naming Coote.
Pass Added: 32
Mary Humphreys / George Coote / Robert Holmes Edleston / Watlington / 1929
Variant / Search Form: Mary Humphreys / George Coote / Robert Holmes Edleston / Watlington / 1929
Notes: Renewed search still did not locate the original Watlington-specific 1929 conveyance.
Pass Added: 32
Hare / Plestow / Watlington / 1760s-1781 / conveyance
Variant / Search Form: Hare / Plestow / Watlington / 1760s-1781 / conveyance
Notes: Renewed search still did not locate a substantive public digital Hare-estate → Plestow transfer deed.
Pass Added: 32
George Colt / Thomas Shouldham / 1587 / 1596 / conveyance
Variant / Search Form: George Colt / Thomas Shouldham / 1587 / 1596 / conveyance
Notes: Renewed search did not resolve the 1587/1596 conflict from the underlying conveyance; conflict remains open.
Pass Added: 32
Watlington Hall Park / 1839 / 1869 / 1885 / Neighbourhood Plan
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Hall Park / 1839 / 1869 / 1885 / Neighbourhood Plan
Notes: Official Watlington Neighbourhood Plan repeats the historic-park chronology and points to the Norfolk HER record.
Pass Added: 32
Hare 3085 201 x 6 / Leonard Buttes / Johanna / Sir John Hare / Gawsells / 1628
Variant / Search Form: Hare 3085 201 x 6 / Leonard Buttes / Johanna / Sir John Hare / Gawsells / 1628
Notes: Exact NRO recovery instrument target naming Gawsells, Shouldham Thorpe/Garboysthorpe and Foston Russels; catalogue-only but critical.
Pass Added: 33
Leonard Buttes / Bromley / Gawsells / Shouldham Thorpe / Foston Russels / Sir John Hare
Variant / Search Form: Leonard Buttes / Bromley / Gawsells / Shouldham Thorpe / Foston Russels / Sir John Hare
Notes: Use to locate enrolments, recovery proceedings or duplicates of the 11 Apr 1628 deed.
Pass Added: 33
HARE 1965 193X2 / John Godbold / John Hare / Thurstons / Fincham / 1636
Variant / Search Form: HARE 1965 193X2 / John Godbold / John Hare / Thurstons / Fincham / 1636
Notes: Open Godbould PDF gives exact deed transcription/reference; original deed image remains a potential retrieval target.
Pass Added: 33
Hare 5466 222 x 5 / Colts Farm / Shouldham / Sir Thomas Hare / 1871
Variant / Search Form: Hare 5466 222 x 5 / Colts Farm / Shouldham / Sir Thomas Hare / 1871
Notes: Exact NRO estate-schedule target explicitly naming Colts Farm in Shouldham after the claimed 1869 lordship-sale date.
Pass Added: 33
Colts Farm / Shouldham / Hare estate / post 1869 / tenancy schedules
Variant / Search Form: Colts Farm / Shouldham / Hare estate / post 1869 / tenancy schedules
Notes: Search land/farm administration separately from incorporeal lordship/title succession.
Pass Added: 33
Colts Hall / Charles Lemmon / Sir Thomas Hare / White 1845 Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: Colts Hall / Charles Lemmon / Sir Thomas Hare / White 1845 Shouldham
Notes: Same contemporary directory page pairs Hare's published manorial lordship/major acreage with Lemmon farming Colts Hall.
Pass Added: 33
Watlington Colts / 1869 / George Coote / Colts Farm / Hare estate
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Colts / 1869 / George Coote / Colts Farm / Hare estate
Notes: Renewed distinction test: no substantive digital instrument yet found proving what estate land versus lordship passed to Coote in 1869.
Pass Added: 33
Hare 3085 / recovery / Common Pleas / 1628 / Whitfeld / Spelman
Variant / Search Form: Hare 3085 / recovery / Common Pleas / 1628 / Whitfeld / Spelman
Notes: Search for the enrolled/common-recovery counterpart or subsequent deed showing uses and beneficial destination.
Pass Added: 33
Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / Eliza Coote / probate / Cheltenham
Variant / Search Form: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / Eliza Coote / probate / Cheltenham
Notes: Toms Wills exact co-grantee wording; current rendered page does not expose the deceased/testator or estate tied to the pair.
Pass Added: 34
Mary Rhoda Spooner / COOTE / Bulmer / FreeREG
Variant / Search Form: Mary Rhoda Spooner / COOTE / Bulmer / FreeREG
Notes: FreeREG St Andrew Bulmer unique-names page independently contains the forename string 'Mary Rhoda Spooner' and surname COOTE, but does not pair them in one event; search-control only.
Pass Added: 34
Margaret Spooner / George Coote / Smeetham Hall / Edward Humphreys
Variant / Search Form: Margaret Spooner / George Coote / Smeetham Hall / Edward Humphreys
Notes: Bulmer PDF places Margaret with sister Eliza and brother-in-law George Coote at Smeetham Hall in 1861 and reproduces her 1913 probate to Rebecca Hurrell Coote and Edward Humphreys solicitor.
Pass Added: 34
Rebecca Hurrell Coote / Edward Humphreys / Margaret Spooner probate
Variant / Search Form: Rebecca Hurrell Coote / Edward Humphreys / Margaret Spooner probate
Notes: Exact probate-calendar image visible in the Bulmer PDF; Edward Humphreys's precise relationship to Mary Rhoda remains unproved.
Pass Added: 34
George Coote / Smeetham Hall / Copthall Buildings / 1871
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / Smeetham Hall / Copthall Buildings / 1871
Notes: Official 22 Feb 1871 parliamentary correspondence fixes George Coote's Smeetham Hall/Sudbury and London addresses.
Pass Added: 34
George Coote / Eliza Coote / Bulmer grave / 1899 / 1877
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / Eliza Coote / Bulmer grave / 1899 / 1877
Notes: Bulmer graveyard list records shared plot 35: Eliza 4 Oct 1877 and George 8 Jun 1899; distinguish separate George d. 13 May 1878, plot 33.
Pass Added: 34
Misses Coote / Chilton Lodge / 1908 / late George Coote
Variant / Search Form: Misses Coote / Chilton Lodge / 1908 / late George Coote
Notes: Suffolk Free Press transcription gives post-George family/property continuity but does not identify the Misses Coote individually.
Pass Added: 34
George Coote / Chilton Lodge / Smeetham Hall / Kelly 1902
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / Chilton Lodge / Smeetham Hall / Kelly 1902
Notes: Search surfaced a 1902 directory transcription styling George Coote lord of Smeetham Hall after the graveyard's 1899 death date; treat as stale/different-George conflict until resolved.
Pass Added: 34
Mary Humphreys / Watlington / Edleston / 1929 / original conveyance
Variant / Search Form: Mary Humphreys / Watlington / Edleston / 1929 / original conveyance
Notes: Renewed focused search still did not locate the original Watlington-specific 1929 conveyance.
Pass Added: 34
Edward Humphreys / Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / relationship
Variant / Search Form: Edward Humphreys / Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / relationship
Notes: No direct source found in this pass establishing Edward Humphreys's exact relationship to Mary Rhoda.
Pass Added: 34
George Coote / Watlington / 1869 / purchaser
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / Watlington / 1869 / purchaser
Notes: No original 1869 Watlington purchaser/title instrument located in this pass; Cambridge sale particulars remain the critical target.
Pass Added: 34
Hare / Plestow / Watlington / conveyance
Variant / Search Form: Hare / Plestow / Watlington / conveyance
Notes: No new substantive public digital Hare→Plestow conveyance located in this pass.
Pass Added: 34
Thomas Plestow / Elizabeth Berners / Watlington / 1795 / 1781
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Plestow / Elizabeth Berners / Watlington / 1795 / 1781
Notes: Farrer Watlington memorial gives Thomas d. 4 Sep 1795 aged 79 and Elizabeth, daughter of W. Berners, d. 30 Apr 1781 aged 58.
Pass Added: 35
Elizabeth Plestow / Norfolk Chronicle / Monday last / 5 May 1781
Variant / Search Form: Elizabeth Plestow / Norfolk Chronicle / Monday last / 5 May 1781
Notes: Memorial date 30 Apr 1781 exactly reconciles the newspaper's 'Monday last' wording.
Pass Added: 35
Mary Rhoda Spooner Coote / George Coote / 1891 / Great Cornard
Variant / Search Form: Mary Rhoda Spooner Coote / George Coote / 1891 / Great Cornard
Notes: Indexed 1891 census extraction explicitly gives George Coote, 69, Head and Mary Rhoda Spooner, 35, Daughter.
Pass Added: 35
Mary Rhoda Spooner Coote / Witham / daughter / Great Cornard
Variant / Search Form: Mary Rhoda Spooner Coote / Witham / daughter / Great Cornard
Notes: Use exact census identity to hunt marriage, probate and 1929 conveyancing records.
Pass Added: 35
Mary Rhoda Spooner Coote / Humphreys / marriage
Variant / Search Form: Mary Rhoda Spooner Coote / Humphreys / marriage
Notes: Focused search did not locate a substantive public marriage record in this pass.
Pass Added: 35
Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / 1929 / Watlington / conveyance
Variant / Search Form: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / 1929 / Watlington / conveyance
Notes: Father–daughter identity is now independently strengthened, but the Watlington-specific 1929 conveyance remains unfound.
Pass Added: 35
Hare / Plestow / Thomas Plestow / Watlington / pre-1781 transfer
Variant / Search Form: Hare / Plestow / Thomas Plestow / Watlington / pre-1781 transfer
Notes: Memorial and newspaper now fix Thomas/Elizabeth at Watlington by 1781, but no original Hare→Plestow transfer deed was located.
Pass Added: 35
Watlington Hall Estate / George Coote / 1869 / purchaser
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Hall Estate / George Coote / 1869 / purchaser
Notes: No new original purchaser/title instrument located; Cambridge 48-lot sale particulars remain the critical retrieval target.
Pass Added: 35
George Coote / auctioneer / estate agent / Smeetham Hall / 1871
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / auctioneer / estate agent / Smeetham Hall / 1871
Notes: Bulmer Smeetham Hall PDF explicitly describes him as a Sudbury auctioneer and estate agent as well as farmer.
Pass Added: 36
George Coote / Overhall Estate / manor / Gestingthorpe / 1869
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / Overhall Estate / manor / Gestingthorpe / 1869
Notes: Contemporary newspaper transcription proves he was auctioning a manorial estate in early 1869.
Pass Added: 36
George Coote / Maplestead Cock / September 1869 / auction
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / Maplestead Cock / September 1869 / auction
Notes: 2 Sep 1869 report says the public house was sold by Geo. Coote; purchaser was the tenant Samuel Richbell.
Pass Added: 36
George Coote / Pound Farm / Gestingthorpe / 16 Sep 1869
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / Pound Farm / Gestingthorpe / 16 Sep 1869
Notes: Contemporary sale notice places Coote conducting auctions during the disputed Watlington-sale period.
Pass Added: 36
Watlington Hall Estate / George Coote / auctioneer versus purchaser / 1869
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Hall Estate / George Coote / auctioneer versus purchaser / 1869
Notes: Critical interpretive control: Coote's profession means his name in sale material would not itself establish buyer status.
Pass Added: 36
Watlington Hall Estate / 4 Aug 1869 / 29 Sep 1869 / purchaser
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Hall Estate / 4 Aug 1869 / 29 Sep 1869 / purchaser
Notes: No public substantive copy of the original 48-lot sale particulars located in Pass 36; date conflict and purchaser remain unresolved.
Pass Added: 36
Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / Watlington / 1929 / conveyance
Variant / Search Form: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / Watlington / 1929 / conveyance
Notes: No original Watlington-specific 1929 conveyance located in Pass 36.
Pass Added: 36
Hare / Plestow / Watlington / pre-1781 conveyance
Variant / Search Form: Hare / Plestow / Watlington / pre-1781 conveyance
Notes: No new substantive digital Hare→Plestow transfer instrument located in Pass 36.
Pass Added: 36
George Coote / Tasmanian Main Line Railway / Smeetham Hall / 1870
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / Tasmanian Main Line Railway / Smeetham Hall / 1870
Notes: Official Tasmanian parliamentary paper names George Coote of Smeetham Hall and describes him as director of large insurance companies.
Pass Added: 37
George Coote / £1,000,000 / Tasmanian Main Line Railway Company
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / £1,000,000 / Tasmanian Main Line Railway Company
Notes: Official company/financial context; use only for holder biography and capacity, not Watlington title proof.
Pass Added: 37
Margaret Coote / eldest daughter / George Coote / Smeetham Hall / 1877
Variant / Search Form: Margaret Coote / eldest daughter / George Coote / Smeetham Hall / 1877
Notes: Bury Free Press transcription gives exact family-order wording and marriage to Henry Stanton Oliver.
Pass Added: 37
Rebecca Messent / George Coote / Smeetham Hall farm / 1860
Variant / Search Form: Rebecca Messent / George Coote / Smeetham Hall farm / 1860
Notes: Pre-1869 operational evidence for George's Smeetham Hall farming concern.
Pass Added: 37
Alfred Clarke / farm steward / George Coote / Smeetham Hall / 1868
Variant / Search Form: Alfred Clarke / farm steward / George Coote / Smeetham Hall / 1868
Notes: Immediate pre-1869 operational evidence showing a staffed Smeetham Hall estate.
Pass Added: 37
George Coote / Overhall / Bury and Norwich Post / 8 Jun 1869
Variant / Search Form: George Coote / Overhall / Bury and Norwich Post / 8 Jun 1869
Notes: Independent British Newspaper Archive indexed result corroborates the Foxearth Overhall auction transcription.
Pass Added: 37
Watlington Hall Estate / George Coote / purchaser / auctioneer / 1869
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Hall Estate / George Coote / purchaser / auctioneer / 1869
Notes: Pass 37 still found no explicit purchaser wording from the original Watlington sale particulars.
Pass Added: 37
Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / Watlington / 1929 / deed
Variant / Search Form: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / Watlington / 1929 / deed
Notes: No original Watlington-specific 1929 conveyance surfaced in Pass 37.
Pass Added: 37
Law of Property Act 1922 / manorial incidents / quit rents / fines / heriots / timber
Variant / Search Form: Law of Property Act 1922 / manorial incidents / quit rents / fines / heriots / timber
Notes: Statutory checklist for identifying which Edleston rights were compensable/extinguished.
Pass Added: 38
Twelfth Schedule / minerals / sporting rights / fairs / markets / chase / warren / piscary
Variant / Search Form: Twelfth Schedule / minerals / sporting rights / fairs / markets / chase / warren / piscary
Notes: Preserved rights not automatically extinguished by copyhold enfranchisement; could be included only by express agreement.
Pass Added: 38
D/Ed 10/3/1-186 / Alconbury Weston / extinguishment / compensation
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/1-186 / Alconbury Weston / extinguishment / compensation
Notes: 223-folio Edleston corpus mainly concerning extinguishment of manorial incidents.
Pass Added: 38
D/Ed 10/3/213-228 / Chesterton / compensation agreements / incidents
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/213-228 / Chesterton / compensation agreements / incidents
Notes: 27 folios of Edleston-Holmes extinguishment correspondence; combine with D/HH 8/2/84-85 tenant schedule.
Pass Added: 38
D/Ed 10/3/237-247 / Glatton with Holme / compensation / incidents
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/237-247 / Glatton with Holme / compensation / incidents
Notes: 15-folio 1930-38 rights-extinguishment correspondence.
Pass Added: 38
D/Ed 10/3/248-264 / Eynesbury / manorial extinguishments
Variant / Search Form: D/Ed 10/3/248-264 / Eynesbury / manorial extinguishments
Notes: Direct Edleston corpus, 1932-40; exact rights/amounts not exposed in catalogue.
Pass Added: 38
D/HH 4/1/536 / Eric Hanby Holmes / £38 6s 8d / Earl of Strathmore
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 4/1/536 / Eric Hanby Holmes / £38 6s 8d / Earl of Strathmore
Notes: Correction control: compensation paid to Earl of Strathmore as lord; Holmes was on payer/tenant side.
Pass Added: 38
D/HH 4/1/533 / £75 / James Iceton / compensation
Variant / Search Form: D/HH 4/1/533 / £75 / James Iceton / compensation
Notes: Separate £75 compensation payment to Earl of Strathmore; must not be confused with Edleston's £75 purchase of five Norfolk manors.
Pass Added: 38
Watlington Colts / Edleston / manorial incidents / 1929-1950 / compensation
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Colts / Edleston / manorial incidents / 1929-1950 / compensation
Notes: Critical unresolved search: no Watlington-specific compensation agreement or award located yet.
Pass Added: 38
Watlington Colts / minerals / timber / sporting / rents / fines / heriots
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Colts / minerals / timber / sporting / rents / fines / heriots
Notes: Rights-status search should distinguish ordinary extinguished incidents from preserved substantive rights.
Pass Added: 38
Gawsels / Watlington / arbitrary fines / 1845 / manorial incidents
Variant / Search Form: Gawsels / Watlington / arbitrary fines / 1845 / manorial incidents
Notes: Manor-specific historical incident: White 1845 explicitly says yearly courts leet/baron and fines arbitrary.
Pass Added: 39
Gawsels / Watlington / courts leet baron / 1883 / George Coote
Variant / Search Form: Gawsels / Watlington / courts leet baron / 1883 / George Coote
Notes: Yearly courts still reported in 1883; source does not repeat arbitrary-fines wording.
Pass Added: 39
Law of Property Act 1925 section 62(3) / conveyance manor / compensation right
Variant / Search Form: Law of Property Act 1925 section 62(3) / conveyance manor / compensation right
Notes: Critical 1929-deed interpretation rule: conveyance presumptively carries appurtenant rights and compensation rights subject to contrary intention.
Pass Added: 39
MAF 13 / Watlington / Gawsels / Gawsells / Colts / Trussbutts
Variant / Search Form: MAF 13 / Watlington / Gawsels / Gawsells / Colts / Trussbutts
Notes: National compensation-agreement series; no manor-specific hit located in public index this pass.
Pass Added: 39
MAF 27 / Watlington / Gawsels / Gawsells / Colts / Trussbutts
Variant / Search Form: MAF 27 / Watlington / Gawsels / Gawsells / Colts / Trussbutts
Notes: National compensation-determination series; no manor-specific hit located in public index this pass.
Pass Added: 39
Bowes Manorial Rights / Edleston / 1928 / £19 5s / £50
Variant / Search Form: Bowes Manorial Rights / Edleston / 1928 / £19 5s / £50
Notes: Post-reform quantified manorial-right acquisition comparator.
Pass Added: 39
Bowes Manorial Rights / Edleston / 1931 / £82 5s 5d / £140
Variant / Search Form: Bowes Manorial Rights / Edleston / 1931 / £82 5s 5d / £140
Notes: Post-reform quantified manorial-right acquisition comparator.
Pass Added: 39
Bowes Manorial Rights / Edleston / 1934 / £21 6s 6d / £47
Variant / Search Form: Bowes Manorial Rights / Edleston / 1934 / £21 6s 6d / £47
Notes: Post-reform quantified manorial-right acquisition comparator.
Pass Added: 39
Bowes sporting rights / stints / Edleston / Hanby Holmes
Variant / Search Form: Bowes sporting rights / stints / Edleston / Hanby Holmes
Notes: Substantive sporting/common-related rights survived and generated income in the Edleston/Holmes environment.
Pass Added: 39
Watlington Gawsels / last court / last fine / 1883-1926
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Gawsels / last court / last fine / 1883-1926
Notes: New priority: identify last court, last arbitrary fine/rental and any pre-1926 enfranchisement before the Edleston acquisition.
Pass Added: 39
HM Land Registry Practice Guide 22 / lordship land rights separate
Variant / Search Form: HM Land Registry Practice Guide 22 / lordship land rights separate
Notes: Lordship may exist without land/rights; rights and manorial land can be severed.
Pass Added: 40
profit a prendre / fishing / piscary / in gross
Variant / Search Form: profit a prendre / fishing / piscary / in gross
Notes: Fishing can be a separately owned right to take fish from another person's land/water.
Pass Added: 40
Watlington / lake / fishing rights / piscary
Variant / Search Form: Watlington / lake / fishing rights / piscary
Notes: Do not infer lord owns fish or lake simply because water lies within historic manor extent.
Pass Added: 40
Watlington / mines minerals / former copyhold / reservation
Variant / Search Form: Watlington / mines minerals / former copyhold / reservation
Notes: Mineral estate can be severed; prove parcel-specific reservation and current title/protection.
Pass Added: 40
Watlington / sporting game rights / shooting / manor
Variant / Search Form: Watlington / sporting game rights / shooting / manor
Notes: Sporting rights can survive separately but require specific grant/reservation and affected parcels.
Pass Added: 40
manorial rights / 13 October 2013 / notice / Watlington
Variant / Search Form: manorial rights / 13 October 2013 / notice / Watlington
Notes: Existing rights did not automatically cease, but post-2013 purchaser/registration chronology may defeat unprotected rights.
Pass Added: 40
Watlington / HM Land Registry titles / manorial rights notice
Variant / Search Form: Watlington / HM Land Registry titles / manorial rights notice
Notes: Future parcel-by-parcel task: identify modern titles covering historic manor and check notices/cautions.
Pass Added: 40
Law of Property Act 1925 62(3) / contrary intention / manor
Variant / Search Form: Law of Property Act 1925 62(3) / contrary intention / manor
Notes: Default conveyance language is not proof of existence of every listed right; deed terms control.
Pass Added: 40
12 Feb 1930 / Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / Robert Holmes Edleston / Watlington Colts
Variant / Search Form: 12 Feb 1930 / Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / Robert Holmes Edleston / Watlington Colts
Notes: Restored decisive primary-conveyance gateway from prior rights project.
Pass Added: 41
"rights royalties members and appurtenances" / Watlington Colts / 1930
Variant / Search Form: "rights royalties members and appurtenances" / Watlington Colts / 1930
Notes: Exact operative wording restored to cumulative rights analysis.
Pass Added: 41
"as far as the same respectively are subsisting" / Watlington Colts
Variant / Search Form: "as far as the same respectively are subsisting" / Watlington Colts
Notes: Survival qualifier: deed carries only then-subsisting interests.
Pass Added: 41
Shouldham Forest / 1943 / Hare Estate / sporting rights retained
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Forest / 1943 / Hare Estate / sporting rights retained
Notes: Official Forestry England plan; wider-estate sporting right, Colts connection unproved.
Pass Added: 41
Watlington 1749 inclosure / free fold / commons / wastes / minerals
Variant / Search Form: Watlington 1749 inclosure / free fold / commons / wastes / minerals
Notes: Critical pre-1930 transformation gate for fold/common/waste/mineral candidates.
Pass Added: 41
Rights Survival Ledger / 28 rights / Pass 19
Variant / Search Form: Rights Survival Ledger / 28 rights / Pass 19
Notes: Legacy 28-right analysis imported verbatim to new Rights Survival Legacy sheet.
Pass Added: 41
HARE 4065 / 30 Sep 1587 / Watlyngton alias Watlyngton Coltes / recovery
Variant / Search Form: HARE 4065 / 30 Sep 1587 / Watlyngton alias Watlyngton Coltes / recovery
Notes: Restored exact assurance step; not final bargain and sale.
Pass Added: 42
HARE 2402 / 17 Mar 1597 / Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2402 / 17 Mar 1597 / Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes
Notes: Key operative bargain-and-sale title anchor; original scan still required.
Pass Added: 42
HARE 2403 / 20 Oct 1597 / liberty of a fold / Watlyngton Coltes
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2403 / 20 Oct 1597 / liberty of a fold / Watlyngton Coltes
Notes: Strong fold-liberty evidence tied to 1597 title package; survival still depends on 1749 and later events.
Pass Added: 42
MS 7245 7B4 / Elizabeth Roberts / Watlington Inclosure Award / 1749
Variant / Search Form: MS 7245 7B4 / Elizabeth Roberts / Watlington Inclosure Award / 1749
Notes: Exact surviving award extract; full award/map/claims remain missing.
Pass Added: 42
16 Dec 1929 / James Henry Townsend Green / Public Trustee / Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys
Variant / Search Form: 16 Dec 1929 / James Henry Townsend Green / Public Trustee / Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys
Notes: Immediate predecessor title recited in 1930 deed; obtain full conveyance.
Pass Added: 42
12 Feb 1930 / £100 / beneficial owner / four Watlington lordships
Variant / Search Form: 12 Feb 1930 / £100 / beneficial owner / four Watlington lordships
Notes: Full primary-deed details restored to current main ledger.
Pass Added: 42
21 Dec 1977 / administrator de bonis non / Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts
Variant / Search Form: 21 Dec 1977 / administrator de bonis non / Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts
Notes: First 1977 assent expressly schedules Watlington title package.
Pass Added: 42
21 Dec 1977 / vesting assent / Eric Holmes / Richard John Hanby Holmes
Variant / Search Form: 21 Dec 1977 / vesting assent / Eric Holmes / Richard John Hanby Holmes
Notes: Second deed is distinct residual sweep into Richard in fee simple.
Pass Added: 42
30 Oct 1969 assent / Richard John Hanby Holmes / Sarah estate
Variant / Search Form: 30 Oct 1969 assent / Richard John Hanby Holmes / Sarah estate
Notes: Still decisive for determining what had already vested before 1977.
Pass Added: 42
Shouldham / current Forestry England / leasehold land / landowner
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / current Forestry England / leasehold land / landowner
Notes: Current official tenure control.
Pass Added: 43
Shouldham Woods / 372ha / 999-year lease / Hare Estate / 1943
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Woods / 372ha / 999-year lease / Hare Estate / 1943
Notes: Exact forest-plan ownership/lease terms.
Pass Added: 43
Shouldham Sincks / Stow Estates / owned / 2021
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Sincks / Stow Estates / owned / 2021
Notes: Parish Council current ownership statement.
Pass Added: 43
Stow Estate Trust / Home Farm / Stow Bardolph / current
Variant / Search Form: Stow Estate Trust / Home Farm / Stow Bardolph / current
Notes: Current estate entity; legal identity with 'Stow Estates' remains unproved.
Pass Added: 43
Shouldham Warren / Leziate Beds / sand pit / BGS
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Warren / Leziate Beds / sand pit / BGS
Notes: Physical mineral occurrence and historic extraction.
Pass Added: 43
AOS E / Shouldham / silica sand / landowner Forestry access
Variant / Search Form: AOS E / Shouldham / silica sand / landowner Forestry access
Notes: County planning evidence separating manager from landowner and confirming mineral-search context.
Pass Added: 43
1943 Hare Estate Forestry Commission lease / actual deed / title
Variant / Search Form: 1943 Hare Estate Forestry Commission lease / actual deed / title
Notes: No public lease copy located; critical retrieval target.
Pass Added: 43
Shouldham Warren / Sincks / Land Registry / freehold leasehold title
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Warren / Sincks / Land Registry / freehold leasehold title
Notes: Current registered-title search target.
Pass Added: 43
Forestry England / late 19th century / Stow Bardolph Estate owner of Shouldham woods
Variant / Search Form: Forestry England / late 19th century / Stow Bardolph Estate owner of Shouldham woods
Notes: Direct pre-1943 physical woodland ownership statement.
Pass Added: 44
HARE 6956/1-5 / exchange Hare Hoff / Shouldham Thorpe / c1900
Variant / Search Form: HARE 6956/1-5 / exchange Hare Hoff / Shouldham Thorpe / c1900
Notes: Five marked OS plans; prime parcel-severance target.
Pass Added: 44
HARE 6374-5 / Hare Hoff exchange / related papers
Variant / Search Form: HARE 6374-5 / Hare Hoff exchange / related papers
Notes: Related conveyances/papers expressly cross-referenced from HARE 6956.
Pass Added: 44
Stow Estate / 2010 / 4,000 acres / farming and shooting estate / Hare family
Variant / Search Form: Stow Estate / 2010 / 4,000 acres / farming and shooting estate / Hare family
Notes: Official planning report confirms modern physical/sporting estate continuity.
Pass Added: 44
Shouldham and Shouldham-Thorpe Inclosure / 1798 / Thomas Hare / license to fell timber
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham and Shouldham-Thorpe Inclosure / 1798 / Thomas Hare / license to fell timber
Notes: 11-page Kress schedule with manuscript timber licence.
Pass Added: 44
Shouldham enclosure / 1796 / South Green / Pound Green / Back Street / roads
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham enclosure / 1796 / South Green / Pound Green / Back Street / roads
Notes: Contemporary notice transcription documenting physical road reorganisation.
Pass Added: 44
White 1845 Shouldham / 2,674 acres / rabbit warren / Sir Thomas Hare / William Brighton
Variant / Search Form: White 1845 Shouldham / 2,674 acres / rabbit warren / Sir Thomas Hare / William Brighton
Notes: Upgraded existing 1845 record with land/warren-management evidence.
Pass Added: 45
Shouldham Conservation Area / 65% / Hare Estate / present day / warrener
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Conservation Area / 65% / Hare Estate / present day / warrener
Notes: Official 2009 land-continuity statement.
Pass Added: 45
Shouldham Thorpe 1845 / Fodderston / Dean Chapter Ely / leased to Hare / tithes
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Thorpe 1845 / Fodderston / Dean Chapter Ely / leased to Hare / tithes
Notes: Local control proving ownership and leasehold/lordship interests can split.
Pass Added: 45
Kelly 1912 Shouldham / Henry Hoff principal landowner / Walter Lemmon Colts Hall
Variant / Search Form: Kelly 1912 Shouldham / Henry Hoff principal landowner / Walter Lemmon Colts Hall
Notes: Post-c.1900 exchange corroboration.
Pass Added: 45
land severance / rights retained / Hare Hoff / reservation
Variant / Search Form: land severance / rights retained / Hare Hoff / reservation
Notes: Do not presume; deed-specific reservation test.
Pass Added: 45
1634 Shouldham Warren lease / rabbit quota / Hare / reservation
Variant / Search Form: 1634 Shouldham Warren lease / rabbit quota / Hare / reservation
Notes: Priority target to distinguish warren land from incorporeal right.
Pass Added: 45
Joseph Forby / gamekeeper / Sir Thomas Hare / Shouldham / 1779 1780
Variant / Search Form: Joseph Forby / gamekeeper / Sir Thomas Hare / Shouldham / 1779 1780
Notes: Historic sporting/game enforcement route.
Pass Added: 46
Jonathan Morris / Forby / Overland / Wentworth / gun seizure
Variant / Search Form: Jonathan Morris / Forby / Overland / Wentworth / gun seizure
Notes: Underlying legal pleading target.
Pass Added: 46
Shouldham / nine acres / digging ground / lime kiln
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / nine acres / digging ground / lime kiln
Notes: Actual extraction/resource-use evidence.
Pass Added: 46
Shouldham / fuel allotment / poor / cut peat / 1836
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / fuel allotment / poor / cut peat / 1836
Notes: Separate beneficiary resource-right evidence.
Pass Added: 46
Shouldham Warren / existed 1616 / tree planting 1847 1890
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Warren / existed 1616 / tree planting 1847 1890
Notes: Warren-to-woodland land-use transition.
Pass Added: 46
resource right / beneficiary / land severance / manor
Variant / Search Form: resource right / beneficiary / land severance / manor
Notes: Control against treating all extractive uses as lord's rights.
Pass Added: 46
Shouldham / Poors' Land and Fuel Allotment / charity 207556 / Inclosure Award 1794
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / Poors' Land and Fuel Allotment / charity 207556 / Inclosure Award 1794
Notes: Official statutory-charity route fixing creation date and beneficiary class.
Pass Added: 47
"P.R. 29.(1) p.520" / Shouldham / Inclosure Award / fuel
Variant / Search Form: "P.R. 29.(1) p.520" / Shouldham / Inclosure Award / fuel
Notes: Exact governing-instrument cross-reference supplied by Charity Commission.
Pass Added: 47
Shouldham / Forestry Commission / Twenty-Fourth Annual Report / 1943 / unit 140
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / Forestry Commission / Twenty-Fourth Annual Report / 1943 / unit 140
Notes: Primary administrative confirmation of Forestry Commission presence by Sep 1943.
Pass Added: 47
Wentworth / Forby / Morris / Overland / volume 2 / trespass / citation control
Variant / Search Form: Wentworth / Forby / Morris / Overland / volume 2 / trespass / citation control
Notes: Resolve mismatch between Fincham citation and currently surfaced Vol. II scans.
Pass Added: 47
Shouldham Warren / 1943 / leased from the landowner / 999 years / Norfolk County Council
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Warren / 1943 / leased from the landowner / 999 years / Norfolk County Council
Notes: Independent official wording of 1943 leasehold transaction; use to separate Forestry from superior landowner.
Pass Added: 48
HARE 6962-86 / Hare Stow Hall / maps surveys valuations estate papers 1845-1958
Variant / Search Form: HARE 6962-86 / Hare Stow Hall / maps surveys valuations estate papers 1845-1958
Notes: Exact NRO accession block spanning 1943; search for lease counterpart and reservations.
Pass Added: 48
Hare family archive / Stow Bardolph / c.1100-1985 / deeds estate maps rentals / Norfolk Record Office
Variant / Search Form: Hare family archive / Stow Bardolph / c.1100-1985 / deeds estate maps rentals / Norfolk Record Office
Notes: Newly retained major archive; request item-level finding aid for 1943 Forestry/Shouldham material.
Pass Added: 48
MAF 50 / Shouldham / Forestry Commission / Treasury Solicitor / Hare Estate / Stow Bardolph
Variant / Search Form: MAF 50 / Shouldham / Forestry Commission / Treasury Solicitor / Hare Estate / Stow Bardolph
Notes: Primary legal-casework route for lease drafting, title advice, disputes, covenants or compensation.
Pass Added: 49
MAF 32 / Shouldham / Shouldham Thorpe / Hare / Stow / landowner / 1941 1943
Variant / Search Form: MAF 32 / Shouldham / Shouldham Thorpe / Hare / Stow / landowner / 1941 1943
Notes: National Farm Survey individual holding forms immediately before the Forestry lease.
Pass Added: 49
MAF 73 / Shouldham / Shouldham Thorpe / Warren / Sincks / National Farm Survey map
Variant / Search Form: MAF 73 / Shouldham / Shouldham Thorpe / Warren / Sincks / National Farm Survey map
Notes: Map-first route to exact wartime holding boundaries and farm codes.
Pass Added: 49
Shouldham / Forestry Commission / 1290 acres / 1959 / lease variation / disposal
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / Forestry Commission / 1290 acres / 1959 / lease variation / disposal
Notes: Explain why the 1959 Forestry unit exceeded the modern 372ha leasehold forest area.
Pass Added: 49
Shouldham Warren / Hare Estate / Forestry Commission / action / claim / covenant / trespass / sporting rights / High Court
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Warren / Hare Estate / Forestry Commission / action / claim / covenant / trespass / sporting rights / High Court
Notes: Continue search for reported or unreported litigation and rights enforcement outside NRO.
Pass Added: 49
Shouldham / Forestry Act 1945 / Minister of Agriculture / vesting / lease / Forestry Commissioners
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / Forestry Act 1945 / Minister of Agriculture / vesting / lease / Forestry Commissioners
Notes: Trace statutory vesting of the 1943 leasehold interest and identify the legal government-side proprietor after 1945.
Pass Added: 49
Lynn Forest / Shouldham / Gaywood / 1960 amalgamation / working plan
Variant / Search Form: Lynn Forest / Shouldham / Gaywood / 1960 amalgamation / working plan
Notes: Find the exact working-plan/forest-history files explaining the merger and component boundaries.
Pass Added: 50
Shouldham Forest / 956 acres / 1953 / 1290 acres / 1954
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Forest / 956 acres / 1953 / 1290 acres / 1954
Notes: Narrow the 334-acre increase to a supplemental lease, acquisition, inclusion or re-survey.
Pass Added: 50
Shouldham / Forestry Commission / 1953 1954 / additional land / lease / purchase / entry secured
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / Forestry Commission / 1953 1954 / additional land / lease / purchase / entry secured
Notes: Search Forestry estate/legal records for the one-year change window.
Pass Added: 50
Lynn Forest / 2698 acres / 2474 acres / 1965 1966 / disposal / adjustment / resurvey
Variant / Search Form: Lynn Forest / 2698 acres / 2474 acres / 1965 1966 / disposal / adjustment / resurvey
Notes: Identify the exact 224-acre combined-unit change and affected forest/parcels.
Pass Added: 50
F 37 / Lynn / Shouldham / Gaywood / Forest Histories / Working Plans
Variant / Search Form: F 37 / Lynn / Shouldham / Gaywood / Forest Histories / Working Plans
Notes: Piece-level TNA retrieval route for maps, compartment histories and boundary changes.
Pass Added: 50
MAF 50 / Lynn Forest / Shouldham / Gaywood / lease variation / surrender / supplemental lease
Variant / Search Form: MAF 50 / Lynn Forest / Shouldham / Gaywood / lease variation / surrender / supplemental lease
Notes: Cross-search Treasury Solicitor legal casework using the later administrative name.
Pass Added: 50
Lynn Forest Shouldham / compartment / working plan / estate map / tenure
Variant / Search Form: Lynn Forest Shouldham / compartment / working plan / estate map / tenure
Notes: Trace Shouldham's distinct compartments inside the merged Lynn unit.
Pass Added: 50
Shouldham Warren / 1943 lease / 1954 expansion / Stow Bardolph / Hare Estate
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Warren / 1943 lease / 1954 expansion / Stow Bardolph / Hare Estate
Notes: Test whether the 334-acre change involved the same superior owner or another tenure stream.
Pass Added: 50
HARE 5370 221 X 6 Colts Farm
Variant / Search Form: HARE 5370 221 X 6 Colts Farm
Notes: 1849 Wiggins survey/terrier/valuation; test whether Colts Farm is scheduled
Pass Added: 51
Colts Farm 1849 terrier John Wiggins
Variant / Search Form: Colts Farm 1849 terrier John Wiggins
Notes: Mid-century acreage/tenant/valuation bridge
Pass Added: 51
Shouldham VG 168 Village Green Commons Commissioner
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham VG 168 Village Green Commons Commissioner
Notes: Local unclaimed-ownership / statutory vesting control
Pass Added: 51
NHER 4283 protection agreement owner
Variant / Search Form: NHER 4283 protection agreement owner
Notes: Identify parties to 2001 protection agreement and exact protected parcel
Pass Added: 51
Watlington Colts reputed manor land section 62
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Colts reputed manor land section 62
Notes: Test corporeal land passing with manor under LPA 1925 s.62(3)
Pass Added: 51
Colts Homestall Batchelors Appletons alder carr
Variant / Search Form: Colts Homestall Batchelors Appletons alder carr
Notes: Parcel-name reconstruction from 1633 / 1843 evidence
Pass Added: 51
HARE 2495 HARE 6832 parcel ownership
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2495 HARE 6832 parcel ownership
Notes: Crosswalk 1633 field book to 1811 estate map
Pass Added: 51
unregistered land Colts Hall Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: unregistered land Colts Hall Shouldham
Notes: HMLR index-map / unregistered-title audit phrase
Pass Added: 51
Norfolk LVII.7 / Shouldham / 1904 / 25 inch / Colts Hall
Variant / Search Form: Norfolk LVII.7 / Shouldham / 1904 / 25 inch / Colts Hall
Notes: Pre-1930 OS parcel-boundary crosswalk; physical geography only.
Pass Added: 52
Norfolk LVII.7 / Shouldham / 1927 / 25 inch / Colts Hall
Variant / Search Form: Norfolk LVII.7 / Shouldham / 1927 / 25 inch / Colts Hall
Notes: Near-1930 OS revision; compare with 1904 and 1929/1930 deeds.
Pass Added: 52
Colts Hall Farm / Shouldham / Valuation Office / 1910 / IR 58
Variant / Search Form: Colts Hall Farm / Shouldham / Valuation Office / 1910 / IR 58
Notes: Find annotated plan assessment number, then matching field book.
Pass Added: 52
Colts Farm / Shouldham / Finance Act 1910 / owner occupier
Variant / Search Form: Colts Farm / Shouldham / Finance Act 1910 / owner occupier
Notes: Edwardian ownership/tenancy/acreage route.
Pass Added: 52
Colts Hall / Shouldham / INSPIRE ID / freehold title
Variant / Search Form: Colts Hall / Shouldham / INSPIRE ID / freehold title
Notes: Modern HMLR polygon screening; follow ID to register and plan.
Pass Added: 52
TF6784408887 / Colts Hall / HMLR index map
Variant / Search Form: TF6784408887 / Colts Hall / HMLR index map
Notes: Coordinate-led present-title screening; exact legal extent requires title plan/SIM.
Pass Added: 52
HARE 2402 / Runcton Holme / Colt lands / 1597
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2402 / Runcton Holme / Colt lands / 1597
Notes: Outlying parcel recovery: conveyed in same deed; manor-membership unproved.
Pass Added: 53
HARE 2402 / Thorpland / Colt lands / 1597
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2402 / Thorpland / Colt lands / 1597
Notes: Outlying parcel recovery; keep distinct from Wallington cum Thorpland identity issue.
Pass Added: 53
HARE 2402 / Tottenhill / Setchey / Colt messuages lands tenements
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2402 / Tottenhill / Setchey / Colt messuages lands tenements
Notes: Search later conveyances, enclosure and valuation records for the 1597 Colt package.
Pass Added: 53
HARE 2402 / Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen / St Peter / St Germans / St Mary / Colt
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2402 / Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen / St Peter / St Germans / St Mary / Colt
Notes: Fen/Marshland outlying-estate recovery cluster.
Pass Added: 53
HARE 2402 / Terrington / Marshland / Colt lands
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2402 / Terrington / Marshland / Colt lands
Notes: Search later estate sales, enclosure, tithe and valuation records.
Pass Added: 53
A Pearce / Colts Hall / 2/02/1587/O / Certificate A / Certificate B
Variant / Search Form: A Pearce / Colts Hall / 2/02/1587/O / Certificate A / Certificate B
Notes: Retrieve 2002 planning ownership certificate; applicant status alone is not ownership.
Pass Added: 53
Alfred George Pearce / Colts Hall / Companies House / title
Variant / Search Form: Alfred George Pearce / Colts Hall / Companies House / title
Notes: Late-modern occupant/address lead only; cross-check HMLR independently.
Pass Added: 53
unregistered land / Colts Hall / adjoining titles / other land / deed
Variant / Search Form: unregistered land / Colts Hall / adjoining titles / other land / deed
Notes: HMLR-recommended route for any gap not resolved by direct registered title.
Pass Added: 53
Form SIM / Colts Hall / Shouldham / index map / unregistered
Variant / Search Form: Form SIM / Colts Hall / Shouldham / index map / unregistered
Notes: Parcel-by-parcel HMLR status test using mapped reconstructed historic boundaries.
Pass Added: 54
PG10 / official search index map / Colts / Batchelors / Appletons / Alder Carr
Variant / Search Form: PG10 / official search index map / Colts / Batchelors / Appletons / Alder Carr
Notes: Check registered title numbers, pending first registrations and cautions for each candidate.
Pass Added: 54
unregistered freehold / Colts / root of title / deed / assent
Variant / Search Form: unregistered freehold / Colts / root of title / deed / assent
Notes: Trace specific parcel through deed chain; do not treat unregistered as ownerless.
Pass Added: 54
PG1 / good root of title / possession / rents and profits / Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: PG1 / good root of title / possession / rents and profits / Shouldham
Notes: First-registration proof standard for any confirmed unregistered residue.
Pass Added: 54
PG2 / lost deeds / reconstructed title / Colts / Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: PG2 / lost deeds / reconstructed title / Colts / Shouldham
Notes: Use only if a specific unregistered parcel is traced to claimant but original deeds are missing.
Pass Added: 54
Land Charges / Colts / Shouldham / previous owner / 1925
Variant / Search Form: Land Charges / Colts / Shouldham / previous owner / 1925
Notes: Search burdens/interests; not ownership proof.
Pass Added: 54
scattered small pieces / manorial land / transferred separately / PG22
Variant / Search Form: scattered small pieces / manorial land / transferred separately / PG22
Notes: Residual-fragment test: only land not separately transferred remains manorial land.
Pass Added: 54
residual manorial fragment / 1930 conveyance / Humphreys / Edleston / SIM
Variant / Search Form: residual manorial fragment / 1930 conveyance / Humphreys / Edleston / SIM
Notes: Crosswalk historic parcel → 1929/1930 title → modern registration status.
Pass Added: 54
Trussbut Lodge / 22 The Green / Shouldham / PE33 0BY
Variant / Search Form: Trussbut Lodge / 22 The Green / Shouldham / PE33 0BY
Notes: Test current property name against planning history, OS/address history, HMLR and historic Colts parcel geometry; naming date unknown.
Pass Added: 54
Colts Hall 21 The Green / Trussbut Lodge 22 The Green / parcel crosswalk
Variant / Search Form: Colts Hall 21 The Green / Trussbut Lodge 22 The Green / parcel crosswalk
Notes: Consecutive address/name cluster is a lead only; prove physical adjacency and historical continuity before any title inference.
Pass Added: 54
SL26/6/CR/1 / Watlington / 1512 / court roll / transcription
Variant / Search Form: SL26/6/CR/1 / Watlington / 1512 / court roll / transcription
Notes: Primary scan now received; transcribe lord, steward, court type, tenants and every land entry.
Pass Added: 55
SL26/6 / Manor of Watlington in Norfolk / 1512 / Oxfordshire History Centre
Variant / Search Form: SL26/6 / Manor of Watlington in Norfolk / 1512 / Oxfordshire History Centre
Notes: Use parent catalogue for provenance; do not assume Colts identity until internal evidence is read.
Pass Added: 55
1512 Watlington court roll / waste / common / encroachment / road / ditch / fold
Variant / Search Form: 1512 Watlington court roll / waste / common / encroachment / road / ditch / fold
Notes: Extract land/custom clues that can be crosswalked to 1597, 1633 and enclosure records.
Pass Added: 55
1512 Watlington court roll / admission / surrender / heriot / fine / rent / tenant
Variant / Search Form: 1512 Watlington court roll / admission / surrender / heriot / fine / rent / tenant
Notes: Build a holding-by-holding title ledger from the manuscript after palaeographic transcription.
Pass Added: 55
1796 Shouldham enclosure / Pound Green / Abbey Common / South Green / Thomas Hare
Variant / Search Form: 1796 Shouldham enclosure / Pound Green / Abbey Common / South Green / Thomas Hare
Notes: Map named greens/commons and Hare parcels against HARE 6832 and the 1843 tithe.
Pass Added: 55
1796 Shouldham Thorpe enclosure / Rogers Corner / Fedderston Green / road to Watlington
Variant / Search Form: 1796 Shouldham Thorpe enclosure / Rogers Corner / Fedderston Green / road to Watlington
Notes: Test whether the enclosure road network intersects the historic Colts/Trussbutts parcel cluster.
Pass Added: 55
Bowel Wood / Cherry Close / New Close / Oxtorths / Button Fen / Thomas Hare
Variant / Search Form: Bowel Wood / Cherry Close / New Close / Oxtorths / Button Fen / Thomas Hare
Notes: Identify 1796 Hare estate parcels and determine which, if any, overlap Colts rather than other Hare interests.
Pass Added: 55
Shouldham and Shouldham-Thorpe Inclosure / 1798 / Goldsmiths-Kress 17267.1
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham and Shouldham-Thorpe Inclosure / 1798 / Goldsmiths-Kress 17267.1
Notes: Retrieve the complete 11-page schedule/reproduction, not just catalogue metadata.
Pass Added: 55
"License to fell timber" / Thomas Hare / Shouldham / 1798 inclosure
Variant / Search Form: "License to fell timber" / Thomas Hare / Shouldham / 1798 inclosure
Notes: Inspect mounted manuscript between pp. 8-9; determine land named and relationship to allotments.
Pass Added: 55
ad medium filum / Shouldham / road subsoil / Colts / HMLR PG40
Variant / Search Form: ad medium filum / Shouldham / road subsoil / Colts / HMLR PG40
Notes: Audit tiny road-soil strips only after deed/title and road-status checks; presumption is rebuttable.
Pass Added: 55
hedge and ditch / stream bed / lake bed / Colts / residual parcel
Variant / Search Form: hedge and ditch / stream bed / lake bed / Colts / residual parcel
Notes: Use HMLR boundary presumptions as micro-parcel controls, never as automatic title claims.
Pass Added: 55
1798 enclosure schedule / HARE 6832 / 1843 tithe / HMLR SIM / residual strip
Variant / Search Form: 1798 enclosure schedule / HARE 6832 / 1843 tithe / HMLR SIM / residual strip
Notes: Crosswalk enclosure allotments and roads to modern title geometry to find any genuinely unsevered residue.
Pass Added: 55
Shouldham / "one rood of old poor's land" / 12s / 1845
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / "one rood of old poor's land" / 12s / 1845
Notes: Trace the one-rood micro-parcel forward through later directories, charity records, enclosure papers and HMLR; do not assume Colts ownership.
Pass Added: 56
Shouldham / charity 207556 / owns or leases land or property
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / charity 207556 / owns or leases land or property
Notes: Identify exact current land/property held or leased by the Poors' Land and Fuel Allotment charity.
Pass Added: 56
Shouldham Poors Charity / Mill Road / community orchard / allotment land
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Poors Charity / Mill Road / community orchard / allotment land
Notes: Obtain site plan, charity authority/lease/licence and title number for the land offered for the community orchard.
Pass Added: 56
ACC 2022/153 / ?Shouldham extent / Hare MSS / Janet Hammond
Variant / Search Form: ACC 2022/153 / ?Shouldham extent / Hare MSS / Janet Hammond
Notes: Inspect the late-15th/early-16th-century extent and test all names/places against the 1512 Watlington court roll.
Pass Added: 56
ACC 2022/153 / fuel allotment papers / 1470-2020
Variant / Search Form: ACC 2022/153 / fuel allotment papers / 1470-2020
Notes: Ask NRO for the digital-image list, file descriptions and any Shouldham enclosure/poor-land deeds or maps.
Pass Added: 56
HMLR / INSPIRE ID lookup / Shouldham / no INSPIRE ID
Variant / Search Form: HMLR / INSPIRE ID lookup / Shouldham / no INSPIRE ID
Notes: Use only as a candidate-gap screen; follow every apparent gap with SIM because leasehold/other tenure can also lack an INSPIRE polygon.
Pass Added: 56
King's Lynn and West Norfolk / INSPIRE GML / Shouldham / Colts Hall
Variant / Search Form: King's Lynn and West Norfolk / INSPIRE GML / Shouldham / Colts Hall
Notes: Download current local-authority freehold polygons and clip to reconstructed Colts/Homestall/Batchelors geometry.
Pass Added: 56
Trussbot Lodge / modern suburban-type house / Shouldham Conservation Area
Variant / Search Form: Trussbot Lodge / modern suburban-type house / Shouldham Conservation Area
Notes: Closed historic-name lead: use only as a modern address/map locator; do not treat name as Trussbut continuity.
Pass Added: 56
Goldsmiths-Kress 17267.1 / Reel 1619 / Shouldham Inclosure 1798
Variant / Search Form: Goldsmiths-Kress 17267.1 / Reel 1619 / Shouldham Inclosure 1798
Notes: Retrieve the full 11-page primary schedule from Gale/Kress/Harvard or another licensed/open reproduction.
Pass Added: 56
Alfred G. Pearce (Farms) Limited / 01313998 / 10 acres / near the hall / Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: Alfred G. Pearce (Farms) Limited / 01313998 / 10 acres / near the hall / Shouldham
Notes: Trace the 1985 freehold mortgage parcel to a title number and map geometry.
Pass Added: 57
5mDdbZnzVDZjAgW1lBTATDZZYqc / 15 January 1985 / Lloyds / Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: 5mDdbZnzVDZjAgW1lBTATDZZYqc / 15 January 1985 / Lloyds / Shouldham
Notes: Exact Companies House charge identifier and creation date.
Pass Added: 57
403b / 16 June 1992 / Pearce Farms / Shouldham / release
Variant / Search Form: 403b / 16 June 1992 / Pearce Farms / Shouldham / release
Notes: Find the unavailable release statement or equivalent HMLR/company filing to learn whether part/all of the 10-acre security was released.
Pass Added: 57
Shouldham / Small Holdings / 1911 / 30 acres / 16 acres
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / Small Holdings / 1911 / 30 acres / 16 acres
Notes: Identify the farm, owner-occupier and maps behind the Hansard question.
Pass Added: 57
Norfolk County Small Holdings Committee / Shouldham / 1910 / 1911
Variant / Search Form: Norfolk County Small Holdings Committee / Shouldham / 1910 / 1911
Notes: Search committee minutes, county estate papers and Board of Agriculture correspondence.
Pass Added: 57
Board of Agriculture / Shouldham / acquisition order / Small Holdings Act
Variant / Search Form: Board of Agriculture / Shouldham / acquisition order / Small Holdings Act
Notes: Find the underlying statutory order and commissioner report.
Pass Added: 57
Shouldham / 22 landowners / four principal fields / Medlar
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / 22 landowners / four principal fields / Medlar
Notes: Recover Medlar 2001 thesis or its cited primary schedules for parcel-distribution detail.
Pass Added: 57
Shouldham / 1883 pound / 38m / 28m / Colt's Hall
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham / 1883 pound / 38m / 28m / Colt's Hall
Notes: Locate the pound precisely on OS and trace it back through tithe/enclosure and forward into modern title.
Pass Added: 57
2/02/1587/O / 23/00056/F / Westgate Street / A Pearce / Colts Hall
Variant / Search Form: 2/02/1587/O / 23/00056/F / Westgate Street / A Pearce / Colts Hall
Notes: Compare red-line plans to determine whether the 2002 and 2023 sites are identical/overlapping and then run title-map tests.
Pass Added: 57
IR 127/8 / Peterborough King's Lynn / Shouldham / Norfolk XLV.16 / 1910
Variant / Search Form: IR 127/8 / Peterborough King's Lynn / Shouldham / Norfolk XLV.16 / 1910
Notes: Find the Valuation Office annotated plan for the second Shouldham 25-inch sheet and obtain its assessment numbers.
Pass Added: 58
IR 127/8 / Peterborough King's Lynn / Shouldham / Norfolk LVII.7 / 1910
Variant / Search Form: IR 127/8 / Peterborough King's Lynn / Shouldham / Norfolk LVII.7 / 1910
Notes: Run the companion Valuation Office search on LVII.7; do not assume one sheet covers the Colts core.
Pass Added: 58
Norfolk XLV.16 / Shouldham / 1884 / 1885 / 25 inch
Variant / Search Form: Norfolk XLV.16 / Shouldham / 1884 / 1885 / 25 inch
Notes: Use the late-19th-century second-sheet edition to locate pound/Colts-adjacent features after HARE 5466.
Pass Added: 58
Norfolk XLV.16 / Shouldham / 1904 / 1905 / 25 inch
Variant / Search Form: Norfolk XLV.16 / Shouldham / 1904 / 1905 / 25 inch
Notes: Pair with LVII.7 for the Edwardian parcel crosswalk and 1910 Valuation Office search.
Pass Added: 58
Norfolk XLV.16 / Shouldham / 1927 / 1928 / 25 inch
Variant / Search Form: Norfolk XLV.16 / Shouldham / 1927 / 1928 / 25 inch
Notes: Pair with LVII.7 immediately before the 1929/1930 title instruments.
Pass Added: 58
Colts Hall / TF6784408887 / XLV.16 / LVII.7 / sheet boundary
Variant / Search Form: Colts Hall / TF6784408887 / XLV.16 / LVII.7 / sheet boundary
Notes: Plot the listed-building grid reference against the county-series sheet grid before assigning any parcel to a sheet.
Pass Added: 58
01313998 / 403b / 16 June 1992 / mortgage charge released ceased
Variant / Search Form: 01313998 / 403b / 16 June 1992 / mortgage charge released ceased
Notes: Order/recover the unavailable release document and identify the affected charge/property.
Pass Added: 58
RSM 30601 / 1020446 / Shouldham / scheduling file / owner occupier
Variant / Search Form: RSM 30601 / 1020446 / Shouldham / scheduling file / owner occupier
Notes: Use the legacy scheduled-monument identifier to seek the 2001–2002 designation/protection file and plan.
Pass Added: 58
NHER 4283 / 2001 protection agreement / landowner occupier / plan
Variant / Search Form: NHER 4283 / 2001 protection agreement / landowner occupier / plan
Notes: Seek the protection-agreement parties and exact parcel geometry for the surviving Colts-farm earthworks.
Pass Added: 58
"court rowles of watlington" / SL26/6 / 1512
Variant / Search Form: "court rowles of watlington" / SL26/6 / 1512
Notes: Use the exact endorsement wording to find duplicate/parallel cataloguing or an engrossed roll.
Pass Added: 59
5 June 1512 / Watlington / general court / Henry Wyatt
Variant / Search Form: 5 June 1512 / Watlington / general court / Henry Wyatt
Notes: Test whether any parallel court record, account, steward paper or Wyatt estate document names the lord for the same sitting.
Pass Added: 59
Henry Wyatt / Watlington / Ashill / Fincham / NRO Hare 1870 / 1871 / 1875 / 1876
Variant / Search Form: Henry Wyatt / Watlington / Ashill / Fincham / NRO Hare 1870 / 1871 / 1875 / 1876
Notes: Follow Gunn's archival citations and recover the exact Hare item titles/content.
Pass Added: 59
Hare 1870-1 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Hare 1870-1 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington
Notes: Primary-source retrieval target cited by Gunn; exact modern catalogue identity not yet recovered.
Pass Added: 59
Hare 1875-6 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Hare 1875-6 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington
Notes: Companion primary-source retrieval target cited by Gunn; exact contents unverified.
Pass Added: 59
SL26/6 / engrossed court roll / 5 Jun 1512 / Watlington
Variant / Search Form: SL26/6 / engrossed court roll / 5 Jun 1512 / Watlington
Notes: Seek the clean/engrossed version or court book for the same sitting to resolve names and parcels.
Pass Added: 59
Watlington 1512 / surrender / admission / plena seisina / per virgam / Richard
Variant / Search Form: Watlington 1512 / surrender / admission / plena seisina / per virgam / Richard
Notes: Use secure legal formula plus the possible Ric[ardus?] to search indexed/transcribed parallels without forcing the surname.
Pass Added: 59
Pynkeney / Wyatt / Pegge / Watlington / 1506 / court 1512
Variant / Search Form: Pynkeney / Wyatt / Pegge / Watlington / 1506 / court 1512
Notes: Test whether any 1512 tenant/officer name overlaps the 1506 transaction or Wyatt estate personnel.
Pass Added: 59
British Library Add MS 62135 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington / Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: British Library Add MS 62135 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington / Norfolk
Notes: Search the Wyatt Papers for Watlington acquisitions, estate administration, letters or abstracts around 1506–1512.
Pass Added: 59
Watlington Norfolk / Watlington Oxon / Steven Gunn / pages 231 232 / footnote 51
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Norfolk / Watlington Oxon / Steven Gunn / pages 231 232 / footnote 51
Notes: Audit the exact place-name disambiguation and archival footnote behind the Wyatt/Watlington passage; Pass 60 confirms the Norfolk index entry and footnote anchor.
Pass Added: 60
Watlington St Peter / advowson / Henry Wyatt / patron / institution / 1506 / 1512
Variant / Search Form: Watlington St Peter / advowson / Henry Wyatt / patron / institution / 1506 / 1512
Notes: Highest-priority independent identity test: trace the advowson conveyed in the 1506 fine through the next ecclesiastical presentation/institution.
Pass Added: 60
Norwich episcopal register / Richard Nykke / Watlington / presentation / institution / 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512
Variant / Search Form: Norwich episcopal register / Richard Nykke / Watlington / presentation / institution / 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512
Notes: Locate diocesan institution/patronage evidence for St Peter, Watlington during the Wyatt-to-court interval without assuming the patron.
Pass Added: 60
Robert Pynkeney / Elizabeth Pynkeney / Watlington / St Peter / advowson / patron
Variant / Search Form: Robert Pynkeney / Elizabeth Pynkeney / Watlington / St Peter / advowson / patron
Notes: Trace the predecessor advowson/title stream and test whether Pynkeney patronage records lead directly into Wyatt's 1506 acquisition.
Pass Added: 60
John Gawsell / Wallington and Watlington / viv. 1504 / swan marks
Variant / Search Form: John Gawsell / Wallington and Watlington / viv. 1504 / swan marks
Notes: Contemporaneous multiple-interest control: exact institutional-PDF wording now verified; use to prevent automatic merger of bare Watlington references.
Pass Added: 60
Manor of Watlington / Thomas Shuldham / Norfolk Archaeology VI page 300 / Henry Wyatt
Variant / Search Form: Manor of Watlington / Thomas Shuldham / Norfolk Archaeology VI page 300 / Henry Wyatt
Notes: Compare the existing Shuldham generic Watlington title pedigree against the Wyatt stream; do not merge absent a documentary bridge.
Pass Added: 60
HARE 1870 / HARE 1871 / HARE 1875 / HARE 1876 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington / catalogue
Variant / Search Form: HARE 1870 / HARE 1871 / HARE 1875 / HARE 1876 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington / catalogue
Notes: Broaden reference-format searching for Gunn's HARE 1870–1 and 1875–6 while preserving the exact cited form as the control.
Pass Added: 60
St Peter Watlington Norfolk / rector / vacancy / patron / 1510 / 1511 / 1512 / 1513
Variant / Search Form: St Peter Watlington Norfolk / rector / vacancy / patron / 1510 / 1511 / 1512 / 1513
Notes: Search for the vacancy/institution event that would activate the advowson and reveal a patron, without inserting an unverified incumbent name.
Pass Added: 60
Simon Fincham / Watlington rector / 1512 / Norwich will
Variant / Search Form: Simon Fincham / Watlington rector / 1512 / Norwich will
Notes: Candidate incumbent source-finder only. Verify the exact Norwich probate index entry and Watlington incumbency before using the name as evidence.
Simon Fyncham / Watlington rector / 1512 / Norwich will
Variant / Search Form: Simon Fyncham / Watlington rector / 1512 / Norwich will
Notes: Spelling-control search for the same candidate rector/probate lead; do not assume Fincham/Fyncham forms are interchangeable without record control.
Consistory Court of Norwich / Simon Fincham / 1512 / Farrow volume 16
Variant / Search Form: Consistory Court of Norwich / Simon Fincham / 1512 / Farrow volume 16
Notes: Search the published 1370–1550 Consistory Court will index for an exact Simon Fincham/Fyncham entry, register and folio.
Watlington St Peter / vacancy / presentation / 1512 / 1513 / Richard Nykke
Variant / Search Form: Watlington St Peter / vacancy / presentation / 1512 / 1513 / Richard Nykke
Notes: If the candidate incumbent died in 1512, locate the first post-vacancy institution/presentation in the Norwich episcopal register and identify the patron/turn.
Henry Wyatt / St Peter Watlington / advowson / presentation / 1512 / 1513
Variant / Search Form: Henry Wyatt / St Peter Watlington / advowson / presentation / 1512 / 1513
Notes: Test whether Henry Wyatt or his feoffees exercised the advowson after the 1506 final concord; preserve lapse/turn/grant/trustee alternatives.
Robert Pynkeney / St Peter Watlington / incumbent / presentation before 1506
Variant / Search Form: Robert Pynkeney / St Peter Watlington / incumbent / presentation before 1506
Notes: Establish the pre-1506 patron/incumbent stream and whether the 1506 conveyance transferred an advowson whose then incumbent remained in office.
Blyth 1863 / Historical Notices Fincham / Simon / Watlington / rector / will
Variant / Search Form: Blyth 1863 / Historical Notices Fincham / Simon / Watlington / rector / will
Notes: Locate the exact page and wording in the digitised Blyth book; current web metadata verifies the book, not the specific rector statement.
HARE 1870-1 / HARE 1875-6 / NRO / Wyatt / Watlington exact item hierarchy
Variant / Search Form: HARE 1870-1 / HARE 1875-6 / NRO / Wyatt / Watlington exact item hierarchy
Notes: Continue exact-reference recovery through the Norfolk Record Office catalogue hierarchy; current web indexing still has not exposed the item titles/content.
CP 25/1/170/197 no.102 / Wallyngton / Thorplond / 22 May 1506 / IMG_0155
Variant / Search Form: CP 25/1/170/197 no.102 / Wallyngton / Thorplond / 22 May 1506 / IMG_0155
Notes: Same-series Wallington-cum-Thorpland control; exact AALT link corrected in Pass 62.
CP 25/1/170/197 no.106 / Watlyngton / St Peter / 8 July 1506 / IMG_0159
Variant / Search Form: CP 25/1/170/197 no.106 / Watlyngton / St Peter / 8 July 1506 / IMG_0159
Notes: Pair with no.102 to preserve the legal distinction between Wallington/Thorpland and Watlington.
Simon Fyncham / Rector of Watlington / Bl. / Will at Norwich 1512
Variant / Search Form: Simon Fyncham / Rector of Watlington / Bl. / Will at Norwich 1512
Notes: Exact secondary wording now surfaced; trace ‘Bl.’ to its precise Blyth page and then to the underlying probate record.
Simon Fincham / Consistory Court Norwich / 1512 / will index / Fyn
Variant / Search Form: Simon Fincham / Consistory Court Norwich / 1512 / will index / Fyn
Notes: Search spelling variants in the 1370–1550 Norwich Consistory Court will index and recover register/folio.
Watlington / institution / presentation / 1512 / Richard Nix / Norwich
Variant / Search Form: Watlington / institution / presentation / 1512 / Richard Nix / Norwich
Notes: Locate the first institution after the candidate 1512 vacancy; identify patron, presenter and reason for vacancy.
Institution Book XIV 1507-1511 / Norwich / next Institution Book / 1512
Variant / Search Form: Institution Book XIV 1507-1511 / Norwich / next Institution Book / 1512
Notes: Institution Book XIV is independently cited for 1507–11; identify the exact succeeding volume/reference before citing a 1512 entry.
HARE 1870-1 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington / Norfolk Record Office exact title
Variant / Search Form: HARE 1870-1 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington / Norfolk Record Office exact title
Notes: Continue exact catalogue-hierarchy recovery; do not expand the reference beyond Gunn's citation until found.
HARE 1875-6 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington / Norfolk Record Office exact title
Variant / Search Form: HARE 1875-6 / Henry Wyatt / Watlington / Norfolk Record Office exact title
Notes: Continue exact catalogue-hierarchy recovery; do not expand the reference beyond Gunn's citation until found.
Ramsey Abbey / Watlington manor / court baron / customary court / 14 Hen VI / 1435 1436
Variant / Search Form: Ramsey Abbey / Watlington manor / court baron / customary court / 14 Hen VI / 1435 1436
Notes: Recover the underlying medieval court roll and its modern archival shelfmark from the Public Records Commission inventory entry.
“Watlington, manor” / “Roll of court baron and customary court” / Ramsey / modern TNA reference
Variant / Search Form: “Watlington, manor” / “Roll of court baron and customary court” / Ramsey / modern TNA reference
Notes: Exact-phrase route for migrating the nineteenth-century Chapter House/Public Records inventory into the modern catalogue.
SC 2 / Ramsey Abbey / Watlington Norfolk / 1435 / 1436
Variant / Search Form: SC 2 / Ramsey Abbey / Watlington Norfolk / 1435 / 1436
Notes: Test manorial court-roll series without assuming the modern reference; exclude Oxfordshire Watlington false hits.
E 315 / Ramsey Abbey / Watlington Norfolk / court roll
Variant / Search Form: E 315 / Ramsey Abbey / Watlington Norfolk / court roll
Notes: Test ex-monastic/augmentation-office custodial routes suggested by Ramsey Abbey provenance; do not infer series until matched.
John Fyncham / Hare 2026 193 x 5 / 4 Nov 1496 / IPM
Variant / Search Form: John Fyncham / Hare 2026 193 x 5 / 4 Nov 1496 / IPM
Notes: Retrieve the official Norfolk Record Office IPM on John Fyncham and inspect the full inquisition for any unindexed Watlington/Shouldham holdings.
John Fyncham / magistro Symeon Fyncham / Walyngton / Watlington / Shuldham Thorpe / 1496
Variant / Search Form: John Fyncham / magistro Symeon Fyncham / Walyngton / Watlington / Shuldham Thorpe / 1496
Notes: Trace the secondary testament transcription back to the PCC register and determine whether the clerical Symeon is the 1512 rector candidate.
Simon Fyncham / Norwich Consistory Court / 1512 / register / folio / Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Simon Fyncham / Norwich Consistory Court / 1512 / register / folio / Watlington
Notes: Recover exact probate index data and primary register entry; distinguish later same-name Fynchams including the 1538 testator.
Watlington St Peter / rector / presentation / 1512 1513 / patron / Ramsey / Wyatt / Pynkeney
Variant / Search Form: Watlington St Peter / rector / presentation / 1512 1513 / patron / Ramsey / Wyatt / Pynkeney
Notes: Use the first post-vacancy presentation as an independent title-stream test while allowing for lapse, alternate turn or feoffee arrangements.
Watlington-with-West Dereham / first court / 1540 / William Butts / farmer of the King
Variant / Search Form: Watlington-with-West Dereham / first court / 1540 / William Butts / farmer of the King
Notes: Highest-priority identity test: recover the first surviving roll and compare its heading with the 32 Hen VIII Butts court note.
Manor of Watlington-with-West Dereham / FamilySearch / film / Norfolk Record Office shelfmark
Variant / Search Form: Manor of Watlington-with-West Dereham / FamilySearch / film / Norfolk Record Office shelfmark
Notes: Resolve the mirror metadata to the direct catalogue object, film number and modern NRO reference.
Watlington West Dereham / 1540 / Firmarii Domini Regis / Butts
Variant / Search Form: Watlington West Dereham / 1540 / Firmarii Domini Regis / Butts
Notes: Search the original/antiquarian Latin formula and spelling variants for the first post-Dissolution court.
West Dereham Abbey chartulary / Add MS 46353 / Watlington / Watlyngton
Variant / Search Form: West Dereham Abbey chartulary / Add MS 46353 / Watlington / Watlyngton
Notes: British Library chartulary is arranged topographically; test whether a Watlington section/deed exists rather than assuming one.
Tittleshall alias Trusbutts / ACC 2002/145 / NRO item reference
Variant / Search Form: Tittleshall alias Trusbutts / ACC 2002/145 / NRO item reference
Notes: Resolve TNA accession-level metadata to the modern item-level NRO catalogue entry and images/order route.
Tittleshall alias Trusbutts / 1622 / first court / Runcton Holme / Tottenhall
Variant / Search Form: Tittleshall alias Trusbutts / 1622 / first court / Runcton Holme / Tottenhall
Notes: Extract opening court heading, lord/steward, tenants and manor members for comparison with Colts/Trussbutts.
Tittleshall alias Trusbutts / Watlington Coltes or Trusbuttes / 1597 / compare
Variant / Search Form: Tittleshall alias Trusbutts / Watlington Coltes or Trusbuttes / 1597 / compare
Notes: Explicitly test whether the two 'Trusbutts' manor names ever cross in the same deed/court record; do not infer from surname alone.
West Dereham manor court / 1792-1856 / ACC 2002/145 / Watlington-with-West Dereham 1786-1909
Variant / Search Form: West Dereham manor court / 1792-1856 / ACC 2002/145 / Watlington-with-West Dereham 1786-1909
Notes: Overlapping date ranges require record-level comparison; do not assume the TNA West Dereham minutes and FamilySearch Watlington-with-West Dereham rolls are the same series.
Watlington / Gawsels / Charles Berners Plestow / advowson / 1845 / George Coote / Gilbert Barker / 1883
Variant / Search Form: Watlington / Gawsels / Charles Berners Plestow / advowson / 1845 / George Coote / Gilbert Barker / 1883
Notes: Use the 1845->1883 split of soil/Hall, Gawsels lordship and rectory patronage as a later severance-control model.
HARE 1870-1 / HARE 1875-6 / Wyatt / Watlington / Add Ch 75893-75992
Variant / Search Form: HARE 1870-1 / HARE 1875-6 / Wyatt / Watlington / Add Ch 75893-75992
Notes: Continue exact HARE reference recovery and cross-check Wyatt-family deed collections without inventing item content.
Thomas Bardolf IPM / 29 Jan 1330 / Watlington and Longham / Geoffrey Bryseyard
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Bardolf IPM / 29 Jan 1330 / Watlington and Longham / Geoffrey Bryseyard
Notes: Trace the exact medieval 'Watlington and Longham' manor forward without assuming it becomes the Trusbut fee.
Geoffrey Bryseyard / Brisyerd / Longham / Watlington / Norfolk / 1330
Variant / Search Form: Geoffrey Bryseyard / Brisyerd / Longham / Watlington / Norfolk / 1330
Notes: Recover independent deeds/IPMs for the Bryseyard title and test Longham/Priors continuity.
Longham Priors / Robert de Watlington / Brussyard / Scarlet / Priors fold
Variant / Search Form: Longham Priors / Robert de Watlington / Brussyard / Scarlet / Priors fold
Notes: Recover the older Longham title history in a scan-backed source; do not rely on an unverified topographical paraphrase.
Holkham Estate Catalogue vol 5 doc 650 / Longham Priors / 28 Sep 1610
Variant / Search Form: Holkham Estate Catalogue vol 5 doc 650 / Longham Priors / 28 Sep 1610
Notes: Locate the underlying Holkham catalogue or manuscript description for Coke's purchase from Futter.
Tittleshall Book 62 / Longham and Watlington / Watlington and Priors / 1611
Variant / Search Form: Tittleshall Book 62 / Longham and Watlington / Watlington and Priors / 1611
Notes: Resolve Tawney's manuscript labels to the Holkham Estate catalogue and inspect the actual survey/rental contents.
Longham and Watlington / 1611 / Sir Edward Coke / rental / survey
Variant / Search Form: Longham and Watlington / 1611 / Sir Edward Coke / rental / survey
Notes: Test whether the 1611 record contains tenants or boundaries that distinguish it from the Shouldham-centred Trusbut fee.
Watlington and Priors / 1611 / foldcourse / Holkham
Variant / Search Form: Watlington and Priors / 1611 / foldcourse / Holkham
Notes: Test whether 'Priors' is a Longham Priors/foldcourse label and map its geographic relationship to Watlington.
Watlington Tottenhill Garbodesthorp Setchey Longham / Thomas Trusbut / 1427 / compare 1330
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Tottenhill Garbodesthorp Setchey Longham / Thomas Trusbut / 1427 / compare 1330
Notes: Run a generation-by-generation fee comparison to identify which 1330 tenant block, if any, becomes the 1427 Trusbut fee.
Wormegay fees / Castelward / Waytefee / Geoffrey Bryseyard / Laurence Trussebute
Variant / Search Form: Wormegay fees / Castelward / Waytefee / Geoffrey Bryseyard / Laurence Trussebute
Notes: Compare feudal burdens and superior-honour wording; same superior service is not enough to prove identical sub-fee.
Longham Priors / Trusbut / Colts / Shouldham / negative control
Variant / Search Form: Longham Priors / Trusbut / Colts / Shouldham / negative control
Notes: Search specifically for any documentary crossover; absent one, preserve Longham/Priors as a competing stream rather than target property.
"NCC Alblaster 156" Thomas Kervyle Watlyngton 1522
Variant / Search Form: "NCC Alblaster 156" Thomas Kervyle Watlyngton 1522
Notes: Recover parallel indexes/copies and independently verify the 1522 younger Kervyle will and property clause.
Pass Added: 66
"NCC Attmere 251" Thomas Kervile Watlington 1535
Variant / Search Form: "NCC Attmere 251" Thomas Kervile Watlington 1535
Notes: Recover parallel indexes/copies and independently verify the elder Kervile will/probate and capital-messuage clause.
Pass Added: 66
"capital messuage" Watlington Kervile "fold cowrse"
Variant / Search Form: "capital messuage" Watlington Kervile "fold cowrse"
Notes: Trace the exact capital messuage and foldcourse wording into deeds, rentals, courts and later estate records.
Pass Added: 66
Parlettes Watlyngton Kervile capital messuage
Variant / Search Form: Parlettes Watlyngton Kervile capital messuage
Notes: Test whether the 1518 Parlettes rent belonged to or was charged on the 1522/1535 Kervile estate; do not assume identity.
Pass Added: 66
Robert Kervyle Watlington 1427 Thomas Kervile 1522 descent
Variant / Search Form: Robert Kervyle Watlington 1427 Thomas Kervile 1522 descent
Notes: Find a generation-by-generation title/family bridge from the 1427 quarter-fee to the Tudor Kervile estate.
Pass Added: 66
Thomas Kervile Watlington Roughton Holme Seche Wiggenhall South Lynn
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Kervile Watlington Roughton Holme Seche Wiggenhall South Lynn
Notes: Search the multi-place estate cluster for fines, deeds, IPMs, rentals and court material.
Pass Added: 66
Kervile fold course and a half Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Kervile fold course and a half Watlington
Notes: Trace Kervile foldcourse rights separately from the 1506 Wyatt free fold and 1597 Colts fold liberty.
Pass Added: 66
Martennes hemppittes Watlington Kervile
Variant / Search Form: Martennes hemppittes Watlington Kervile
Notes: Map the reserved rood/free and copyhold pieces near the hemppittes and identify the relevant court/manor.
Pass Added: 66
SL26/6 Kervile Parlettes Valenger Watlington 1512
Variant / Search Form: SL26/6 Kervile Parlettes Valenger Watlington 1512
Notes: Compare personal/holding names in the 1512 roll against Kervile/Valenger/Parlettes material without presuming a match.
Pass Added: 66
FamilySearch 438436 1472612 Item 10 1702188 Item 14 Watlington-with-West Dereham
Variant / Search Form: FamilySearch 438436 1472612 Item 10 1702188 Item 14 Watlington-with-West Dereham
Notes: Resolve the film segment containing the 1540 opening court and any modern NRO shelfmark/catalogue cross-reference.
Pass Added: 66
Geoffrey Kervyle 1440 Norfolk C 139/98/28
Variant / Search Form: Geoffrey Kervyle 1440 Norfolk C 139/98/28
Notes: Trace the 1440 juror into deeds, fines, probate and residence evidence; test whether he is the secondary-pedigree Geoffrey of Islington/Marshland.
Pass Added: 67
Geoffrey Kervyle Islington Marshland Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Geoffrey Kervyle Islington Marshland Watlington
Notes: Find a primary document explicitly linking Geoffrey to Islington/Marshland and to Robert Kervyle of Watlington or Thomas Kervile.
Pass Added: 67
Robert Kervyle Humphrey Kervyle Watlyngton CP40/1253 1567
Variant / Search Form: Robert Kervyle Humphrey Kervyle Watlyngton CP40/1253 1567
Notes: Recover the underlying Common Pleas membrane/image and determine the full plea, aliases, attorneys and any relationship language.
Pass Added: 67
CP40/1253 d 280 Kervyle Watlyngton
Variant / Search Form: CP40/1253 d 280 Kervyle Watlyngton
Notes: Locate direct AALT/TNA imagery for the Hilary 1567 Kervile debt entry.
Pass Added: 67
Robert Kervyle Watlington 1535 1567 Ann Bennett
Variant / Search Form: Robert Kervyle Watlington 1535 1567 Ann Bennett
Notes: Test whether the 1567 Robert can be linked by primary evidence to the grandson/heir-designate Robert in Thomas Kervile's 1535 will.
Pass Added: 67
Humphrey Kervyle Watlington 1535 1567 Lynn swan mark
Variant / Search Form: Humphrey Kervyle Watlington 1535 1567 Lynn swan mark
Notes: Resolve the multiple Humphrey Kervyles and identify which, if any, is defendant in CP40/1253 d.280.
Pass Added: 67
Kervyle Watlington capital messuage 1567
Variant / Search Form: Kervyle Watlington capital messuage 1567
Notes: Search later deeds/fines/court records to see whether the 1535 capital messuage persists under Robert or Humphrey.
Pass Added: 67
Kervyle Watlington foldcourse 1567
Variant / Search Form: Kervyle Watlington foldcourse 1567
Notes: Trace the foldcourse-and-a-half after the 1535 will; keep separate from Wyatt free fold and Colts fold liberty.
Pass Added: 67
SL26/6 Robert Kervyle Humphrey Kervyle Geoffrey Kervyle
Variant / Search Form: SL26/6 Robert Kervyle Humphrey Kervyle Geoffrey Kervyle
Notes: Re-test the 1512 court-roll names against the denser Kervile chronology without presuming an identity.
Pass Added: 67
Simon Fyncham Fincham West Dereham Roxham Fordham 1427
Variant / Search Form: Simon Fyncham Fincham West Dereham Roxham Fordham 1427
Notes: Use the exact 1427 fee cluster as a control when testing the later Fyncham rector and West Dereham court stream.
Pass Added: 67
Robert Kervyle Watlington Register Surflete 1434 1435
Variant / Search Form: Robert Kervyle Watlington Register Surflete 1434 1435
Notes: Recover the original Norwich register entry/folio and any probate act/image behind the Gurney transcription.
Pass Added: 68
Richard Kervyle manor Watlington 1435 1436
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle manor Watlington 1435 1436
Notes: Trace Richard's possession after Robert's 1435 probate; search court rolls, deeds, fines and death/issue evidence.
Pass Added: 68
John son William son Thomas de Wathlington manor Watlington
Variant / Search Form: John son William son Thomas de Wathlington manor Watlington
Notes: Identify the pre-Kervile de Watlington title sequence named in Robert's 1434 last will.
Pass Added: 68
John filius Willelmi filii Thomae de Wathlington
Variant / Search Form: John filius Willelmi filii Thomae de Wathlington
Notes: Search Latin deed/fine/charter indexes for the precise provenance formula in Robert Kervyle's will.
Pass Added: 68
Richard Kervyle 14 Henry VI Watlington court
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle 14 Henry VI Watlington court
Notes: Test whether Richard appears as lord or tenant in the generic 1435-36 Watlington court baron/customary court roll.
Pass Added: 68
Kervile manor Watlington court baron 1435 1436
Variant / Search Form: Kervile manor Watlington court baron 1435 1436
Notes: Locate the modern shelfmark and opening heading for the 14 Hen VI court roll; compare with Robert's probate and Richard's devise.
Pass Added: 68
Kervile Gawsell Watlington conveyance 1563 1568
Variant / Search Form: Kervile Gawsell Watlington conveyance 1563 1568
Notes: Find the operative deed behind Gurney's qualified post-1563 Kervile-to-Gawsell estate-transfer claim.
Pass Added: 68
Henry Kervile Watlington estate Gawsell 1568
Variant / Search Form: Henry Kervile Watlington estate Gawsell 1568
Notes: Trace Henry's Watlington title/status after the Visitation and identify when the estate leaves the Kervile line.
Pass Added: 68
Walter de Kerville Watlington Edward II
Variant / Search Form: Walter de Kerville Watlington Edward II
Notes: Verify Gurney's secondary statement that Walter de Kerville held land at Watlington under Edward II.
Pass Added: 68
Robert de Kerville Watlington 4 Edward III
Variant / Search Form: Robert de Kerville Watlington 4 Edward III
Notes: Verify the pre-1434 Kervile Watlington landholding statement and determine whether it relates to the later manor.
Pass Added: 68
Richard Kervyle eldest son Robert Watlington Harl 1552
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle eldest son Robert Watlington Harl 1552
Notes: Trace Richard after the 12 Jul 1435 probate and determine when/how the manor left his hands.
Pass Added: 69
Richard Kervyle Geoffrey Kervyle Watlington manor reversion
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle Geoffrey Kervyle Watlington manor reversion
Notes: Search for death without issue, reversion, surrender, settlement or collateral inheritance into Geoffrey's line.
Pass Added: 69
Geoffrey Kervyle Islington Marshland Thomas Watlington court rolls
Variant / Search Form: Geoffrey Kervyle Islington Marshland Thomas Watlington court rolls
Notes: Use Islington/Marshland court material to prove Geoffrey's family and any transfer of Watlington property to son Thomas.
Pass Added: 69
Harl 1552 Kervyle Watlington folio 99 105
Variant / Search Form: Harl 1552 Kervyle Watlington folio 99 105
Notes: Locate the underlying Harleian manuscript images/folios behind the printed Kervyle pedigree.
Pass Added: 69
Adam son John de Watlyngton Thorplond 1340
Variant / Search Form: Adam son John de Watlyngton Thorplond 1340
Notes: Trace Adam and John in Norfolk deeds/fines and test connection to the de Watlington provenance in Robert Kervyle's will.
Pass Added: 69
John de Watlyngton Edmund Kervyle 1361 Blackborough
Variant / Search Form: John de Watlyngton Edmund Kervyle 1361 Blackborough
Notes: Find the underlying C 66 membrane/AALT image and identify whether the named John has other west-Norfolk local records.
Pass Added: 69
John son William son Thomas de Watlington Thorpland
Variant / Search Form: John son William son Thomas de Watlington Thorpland
Notes: Test whether the 1340/1361 de Watlyngton actors can be aligned with the three-generation provenance formula in the 1434 will.
Pass Added: 69
Kervile Gawsell Watlington after 1563 additional estate
Variant / Search Form: Kervile Gawsell Watlington after 1563 additional estate
Notes: Search for a later conveyance as an augmentation/merger rather than origin of Gawsells Manor.
Pass Added: 69
Gawsells Manor 1542 Kervile manor 1563 conveyance
Variant / Search Form: Gawsells Manor 1542 Kervile manor 1563 conveyance
Notes: Search fines, recoveries and deeds for two parallel Watlington manors and any later union.
Pass Added: 69
Richard Kervyle 1435 Watlington 14 Hen VI court
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle 1435 Watlington 14 Hen VI court
Notes: Priority identity test: recover the 1435-36 court roll and search specifically for Richard as lord, tenant or juror.
Pass Added: 69
Richard Kervyle obiit s.p. Watlington Islington Court Rolls
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle obiit s.p. Watlington Islington Court Rolls
Notes: Find the specific Islington court-roll entry/source behind Gurney's statement that Richard died without issue.
Pass Added: 70
Richard Kervyle death without issue Norfolk 1435 1460
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle death without issue Norfolk 1435 1460
Notes: Locate a primary death, probate, court, fine or heirship record establishing Richard's death and estate position.
Pass Added: 70
Richard Kervyle manor Watlington Geoffrey collateral heir
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle manor Watlington Geoffrey collateral heir
Notes: Search for an operative deed, fine, surrender, recovery, inquisition or court entry transferring Robert's manor after Richard.
Pass Added: 70
Kreykyscroft Watlington Kervyle Richard Geoffrey
Variant / Search Form: Kreykyscroft Watlington Kervyle Richard Geoffrey
Notes: Trace the separate 20-acre holding whose will remainder explicitly names Geoffrey.
Pass Added: 70
Creykyscroft Kreykescroft Kervyle Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Creykyscroft Kreykescroft Kervyle Watlington
Notes: Search spelling variants for the 20-acre parcel in deeds, court rolls, rentals, surveys and later estate papers.
Pass Added: 70
Islington Marshland court rolls Kervyle Geoffrey Richard
Variant / Search Form: Islington Marshland court rolls Kervyle Geoffrey Richard
Notes: Recover court-roll references used by Gurney to correct the Kervile pedigree and test collateral succession.
Pass Added: 70
Islington manor Norfolk Kervyle court book Geoffrey
Variant / Search Form: Islington manor Norfolk Kervyle court book Geoffrey
Notes: Find catalogue entries, manuscript references or digitised extracts for the Kervile-associated Islington manor court.
Pass Added: 70
1435 1436 Watlington court Richard Kervyle Geoffrey Kervyle
Variant / Search Form: 1435 1436 Watlington court Richard Kervyle Geoffrey Kervyle
Notes: Search the 14 Hen VI Watlington court roll specifically for Richard/Geoffrey names and capacity.
Pass Added: 70
Robert Kervyle first of family held manor Watlington Walter lands
Variant / Search Form: Robert Kervyle first of family held manor Watlington Walter lands
Notes: Verify Gurney's distinction between earlier Kervile parish landholding and Robert as first Kervile manor-holder from underlying primary records.
Pass Added: 70
Richard Kervyle heirs assigns manor Watlington 1434
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle heirs assigns manor Watlington 1434
Notes: Search legal records for alienation by Richard; Robert's will gave him fee-simple-style wording with heirs and assigns.
Pass Added: 70
Richard Kervyle Watlington obiit s.p. source
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle Watlington obiit s.p. source
Notes: Find the actual source behind Gurney's Watlington-pedigree statement that Richard died without issue; do not assume Islington Court Rolls.
Pass Added: 71
Richard Kervyle Watlington death heir probate court 1435 1500
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle Watlington death heir probate court 1435 1500
Notes: Search independent primary death/heirship evidence for Robert's manor devisee.
Pass Added: 71
Richard Kervyle Watlington court roll 14 Henry VI
Variant / Search Form: Richard Kervyle Watlington court roll 14 Henry VI
Notes: Continue the strongest direct manor-identity test against the 1435-36 generic Watlington court roll.
Pass Added: 71
Geoffrey Kervyle Islington Derebougth Andrewys Oldrobbyslond
Variant / Search Form: Geoffrey Kervyle Islington Derebougth Andrewys Oldrobbyslond
Notes: Trace the named Islington parcels directly devised to Geoffrey in 1434.
Pass Added: 71
Reynhaldeslond Bulweryslond Goldmeysacre Palmeryscroft Rokys Kervyle
Variant / Search Form: Reynhaldeslond Bulweryslond Goldmeysacre Palmeryscroft Rokys Kervyle
Notes: Search Geoffrey's named Islington holdings through manorial accounts, rentals, court rolls and deeds.
Pass Added: 71
Add Roll 67553 67556 Kervyle Islington
Variant / Search Form: Add Roll 67553 67556 Kervyle Islington
Notes: Inspect/order the British Library 1496-1506 Tilney-with-Islington compotus rolls for Kervile names and inherited parcels.
Pass Added: 71
Tilney Islington compotus 1496 1506 Kervyle
Variant / Search Form: Tilney Islington compotus 1496 1506 Kervyle
Notes: Find transcriptions, abstracts or references to Kervile tenants/holdings in the BL account rolls.
Pass Added: 71
Islington Court Rolls Norfolk Kervyle 15th century location
Variant / Search Form: Islington Court Rolls Norfolk Kervyle 15th century location
Notes: Locate the earlier rolls Gurney had access to, without assuming they are the source for Richard d.s.p.
Pass Added: 71
Gurney papers Islington court rolls Norfolk archive
Variant / Search Form: Gurney papers Islington court rolls Norfolk archive
Notes: Trace provenance/dispersal of Daniel Gurney's Islington court-roll material into NRO, BL, Cholmondeley/Houghton or private collections.
Pass Added: 71
Geoffrey Kervyle fee simple Islington 1434 Thomas Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Geoffrey Kervyle fee simple Islington 1434 Thomas Watlington
Notes: Build the separate Geoffrey Islington title chain and test when his son Thomas returns to Watlington.
Pass Added: 71
Katherine Hawdekyn Watlington 1435 1436 manor court
Variant / Search Form: Katherine Hawdekyn Watlington 1435 1436 manor court
Notes: Test the 1435-36 court identity against the Hawdekyn/Bartholomew-descended manor stream.
Pass Added: 72
Thomas Hawdekyn Watlington court baron 14 Hen VI
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Hawdekyn Watlington court baron 14 Hen VI
Notes: Search variants Hardekyn/Hawdekyn for lord/steward/title references in the anonymous court period.
Pass Added: 72
Katherine Curteys Watlington livery 22 Henry VI
Variant / Search Form: Katherine Curteys Watlington livery 22 Henry VI
Notes: Recover the underlying livery/heirship record behind Dashwood's statement.
Pass Added: 72
Katherine Curteys Watlington presentation 1451
Variant / Search Form: Katherine Curteys Watlington presentation 1451
Notes: Recover diocesan institution/presentation evidence and identify the patronal manor/title wording.
Pass Added: 72
Thomas Hawdekyn Watlington presentation 1425 1427
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Hawdekyn Watlington presentation 1425 1427
Notes: Recover the primary ecclesiastical presentation records proving patronage in right of wife.
Pass Added: 72
John Bartholomew Watlington 20 Edward III manor
Variant / Search Form: John Bartholomew Watlington 20 Edward III manor
Notes: Recover the primary instrument showing John Bartholomew holding this manor in 1346-47.
Pass Added: 72
Margaret Glemsford Watlington manor Hawdekyn
Variant / Search Form: Margaret Glemsford Watlington manor Hawdekyn
Notes: Trace the Bartholomew -> Glemsford -> Hawdekyn transfer with fines/deeds.
Pass Added: 72
William de Shuldham Thomas son Nicholas Trussbut 1373
Variant / Search Form: William de Shuldham Thomas son Nicholas Trussbut 1373
Notes: Locate the underlying Stow Bardolph deed or modern NRO HARE shelfmark.
Pass Added: 72
Agnes widow William de Shuldham Trussbut 1386
Variant / Search Form: Agnes widow William de Shuldham Trussbut 1386
Notes: Locate the 26 Jul 10 Ric II release and its modern archive reference.
Pass Added: 72
Thomas Shuldham Watlington will 30 August 1467 Margaret
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Shuldham Watlington will 30 August 1467 Margaret
Notes: Recover the probate/will text confirming life interests in Shouldham, Burnham Deepdale and Watlington.
Pass Added: 72
John Bartholomew Agnes William Shuldham Watlington
Variant / Search Form: John Bartholomew Agnes William Shuldham Watlington
Notes: Trace the exact coheir branch through original deeds/fines rather than relying only on the field-book pedigree.
Pass Added: 73
Agnes Bartholomew William Shuldham Trussbut 1373
Variant / Search Form: Agnes Bartholomew William Shuldham Trussbut 1373
Notes: Locate the original 1373 deed and determine why Agnes's potential claim required protection.
Pass Added: 73
John Shuldham will 28 July 1425 probate 15 October
Variant / Search Form: John Shuldham will 28 July 1425 probate 15 October
Notes: Recover the original probate/register entry and property/heir clauses.
Pass Added: 73
Thomas Shuldham second cousin Katherine Curteys Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Shuldham second cousin Katherine Curteys Watlington
Notes: Find a primary heirship/livery/deed establishing Thomas's actual succession after Curteys.
Pass Added: 73
Thomas Sholdham esquyere 1454 Paston Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Sholdham esquyere 1454 Paston Watlington
Notes: Seek corroborating records that identify the 1454 Paston esquire specifically with Thomas of Watlington.
Pass Added: 73
HARE William de Shuldham Nicholas Trussbut 1373
Variant / Search Form: HARE William de Shuldham Nicholas Trussbut 1373
Notes: Recover the modern NRO/HARE shelfmark for the Stow Bardolph deed cited by Dashwood.
Pass Added: 73
HARE Agnes widow Shuldham Trussbut 26 July 1386
Variant / Search Form: HARE Agnes widow Shuldham Trussbut 26 July 1386
Notes: Recover the modern NRO/HARE shelfmark and full release wording/bounds.
Pass Added: 73
Bartholomew Glemsford Hawdekyn Curteys Shuldham Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Bartholomew Glemsford Hawdekyn Curteys Shuldham Watlington
Notes: Trace the full coheir title chain through primary fines, presentations, liveries and deeds.
Pass Added: 73
title Thomas Shuldham coparceners Manor Watlington field book Fyncham
Variant / Search Form: title Thomas Shuldham coparceners Manor Watlington field book Fyncham
Notes: Locate the original Simeon Fyncham field book or its modern archive reference.
Pass Added: 73
Katherine Curteys livery 22 Hen VI manor Watlington primary
Variant / Search Form: Katherine Curteys livery 22 Hen VI manor Watlington primary
Notes: Recover the actual livery/heirship instrument behind Dashwood's statement.
Pass Added: 73
Alicia Fyncham Laurence Trusbutt marriage settlement 17 Richard II
Variant / Search Form: Alicia Fyncham Laurence Trusbutt marriage settlement 17 Richard II
Notes: Recover the original 1393-94 marriage settlement and exact parties/property schedule.
Pass Added: 74
Laurence Trusbutt Shouldham Alicia Fyncham 1393 1394 deed
Variant / Search Form: Laurence Trusbutt Shouldham Alicia Fyncham 1393 1394 deed
Notes: Search Norfolk deeds, fines, marriage settlements and Stow Bardolph/HARE muniments.
Pass Added: 74
Lawrence Trussebute Watlington quarter fee 1403 John Fyncham Shouldham Thorpe
Variant / Search Form: Lawrence Trussebute Watlington quarter fee 1403 John Fyncham Shouldham Thorpe
Notes: Trace whether marriage/property instruments explain the juxtaposed fee holdings in the Bardolf schedule.
Pass Added: 74
Foston Shouldham Thorpe quarter fee John de Fyncham 1403
Variant / Search Form: Foston Shouldham Thorpe quarter fee John de Fyncham 1403
Notes: Trace the Fyncham quarter-fee independently and compare later Trussbut/Shouldham holdings.
Pass Added: 74
Watlington Tottenhill Setchey Shouldham Thorpe Langham Lawrence Trussebute
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Tottenhill Setchey Shouldham Thorpe Langham Lawrence Trussebute
Notes: Trace the full one-fee block forward and backward, keeping it separate from the additional Watlington quarter-fee.
Pass Added: 74
Margaret widow Thomas Shuldham senior Deepdale Holkhammes 1474
Variant / Search Form: Margaret widow Thomas Shuldham senior Deepdale Holkhammes 1474
Notes: Recover the original 5 Oct 1474 charter or archive catalogue reference.
Pass Added: 74
John Fyncham purchase Burnham Deepdale 1474 Margaret Shuldham
Variant / Search Form: John Fyncham purchase Burnham Deepdale 1474 Margaret Shuldham
Notes: Find the operative purchase/conveyance and determine whether Margaret's life interest was released, commuted or protected.
Pass Added: 74
Deepdale Holkhammes 8 marks 6s 8d Margaret Shuldham charter
Variant / Search Form: Deepdale Holkhammes 8 marks 6s 8d Margaret Shuldham charter
Notes: Search exact rent/annuity wording and feoffee names for the original deed.
Pass Added: 74
Hare 2026 193 x 5 John Fyncham Depdale Brankastir
Variant / Search Form: Hare 2026 193 x 5 John Fyncham Depdale Brankastir
Notes: Use official 1496 IPM to reconstruct Fyncham's later title and look for acquisition recitals.
Pass Added: 74
Thomas Shuldham will 1467 Deepdale Margaret annuity 1474
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Shuldham will 1467 Deepdale Margaret annuity 1474
Notes: Compare the 1467 life-interest wording with the 1474 annuity to identify the legal restructuring.
Pass Added: 74
Burnham Deepdale manor 1474 Fyncham feoffees William Cobbe Bachecroft
Variant / Search Form: Burnham Deepdale manor 1474 Fyncham feoffees William Cobbe Bachecroft
Notes: Trace associated feoffees across surviving Flitcham/Stow Bardolph deeds for the purchase instrument.
Pass Added: 74
Edmund Fyncham of Watlington Laurence Trusbutt family network
Variant / Search Form: Edmund Fyncham of Watlington Laurence Trusbutt family network
Notes: Test the compiled Fincham branch 'of Watlington' against primary deeds and the 1403 fee structure.
Pass Added: 74
Lawrence Trussebute Thomas Trusbut 1418 1427 succession
Variant / Search Form: Lawrence Trussebute Thomas Trusbut 1418 1427 succession
Notes: Find the actual hereditary/conveyancing mechanism between Lawrence's death and Thomas's 1427 fee holding.
Pass Added: 75
HARE 2683 2684 Trussebut Shouldham 1386 feoffment
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2683 2684 Trussebut Shouldham 1386 feoffment
Notes: Obtain manuscript images/catalogue detail and extract every party, parcel, tenure, bound and feoffee.
Pass Added: 75
HARE 2493 Trussebut 330 acres Shouldham Thorpe Fincham
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2493 Trussebut 330 acres Shouldham Thorpe Fincham
Notes: Obtain the estate record and extract the physical parcels behind the 330+ acre total.
Pass Added: 75
Garbodesthorp Garboysthorpe Shouldham Thorpe medieval
Variant / Search Form: Garbodesthorp Garboysthorpe Shouldham Thorpe medieval
Notes: Prove the medieval form/alias chain from 1427 Garbodesthorp to later official Shouldham Thorpe alias Garboysthorpe.
Pass Added: 75
Langham Longham Trusbut Watlington 1403 1427
Variant / Search Form: Langham Longham Trusbut Watlington 1403 1427
Notes: Resolve whether the fifth locality changed, was mistranscribed, or represents two distinct places.
Pass Added: 75
Thomas Trusbut heir Lawrence Trusbut Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trusbut heir Lawrence Trusbut Norfolk
Notes: Search wills, deeds, fines and court records for an explicit kinship/heir statement.
Pass Added: 75
Trusbut one knight fee Watlington Tottenhill Setchey 1418 1427
Variant / Search Form: Trusbut one knight fee Watlington Tottenhill Setchey 1418 1427
Notes: Trace the same one-fee block in intervening and later IPMs/court records.
Pass Added: 75
Watlington Tottenhill Garbodesthorp Setchey Longham Trusbut 1427 1450
Variant / Search Form: Watlington Tottenhill Garbodesthorp Setchey Longham Trusbut 1427 1450
Notes: Push the fee block forward toward the 1450s Trusbut succession and Colt inheritance.
Pass Added: 75
Shouldham Trussebut manor 330 acres HARE 2493 parcel names
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Trussebut manor 330 acres HARE 2493 parcel names
Notes: Recover parcel names capable of matching later Colts Farm / Shouldham / Watlington estate schedules.
Pass Added: 75
Trussebut estates Shouldham 1386 John de Brunham HARE 2683
Variant / Search Form: Trussebut estates Shouldham 1386 John de Brunham HARE 2683
Notes: Recover the feoffment structure and determine whether Laurence's additions included land later appearing in the 1403 fee or Colt schedules.
Pass Added: 75
Bromhill MR7 item 53 Runcton Holme Laurence Trussebut
Variant / Search Form: Bromhill MR7 item 53 Runcton Holme Laurence Trussebut
Notes: Obtain the actual indenture behind the Christ's College catalogue and resolve surname, acreage, parcel descriptions and witnesses.
Pass Added: 76
Christ's College MR4 MR6 Runcton Holme court rolls rental
Variant / Search Form: Christ's College MR4 MR6 Runcton Holme court rolls rental
Notes: Inspect the surviving Runcton manorial corpus for Trusbut names, tenants, parcel names, rents and Wallington/Thorpland holdings.
Pass Added: 76
Runcton Holme Laurence Trussebut 1413 1414 parcel names
Variant / Search Form: Runcton Holme Laurence Trussebut 1413 1414 parcel names
Notes: Test whether the lease parcels recur in HARE 2493, later Trusbut deeds or the 1597 Colt estate.
Pass Added: 76
Thomas Cowlte Jane Trusbut Norfolk heiress 1561
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Cowlte Jane Trusbut Norfolk heiress 1561
Notes: Use the heraldic pedigree as the direct heiress bridge while seeking the operative marriage/inheritance instrument.
Pass Added: 76
Harley MS 1177 Colt Trusbut folio
Variant / Search Form: Harley MS 1177 Colt Trusbut folio
Notes: Locate the exact Colt pedigree folio in the British Library manuscript and inspect the tricked quartered arms.
Pass Added: 76
Jane Joan Trusbut father John Runcton Holme primary
Variant / Search Form: Jane Joan Trusbut father John Runcton Holme primary
Notes: Replace Burke/modern secondary identification with a primary or early heraldic source naming her father and seat.
Pass Added: 76
Joan wife William Parr IPM 15 Edward IV 34
Variant / Search Form: Joan wife William Parr IPM 15 Edward IV 34
Notes: Recover the inquisition post mortem cited by Copinger and extract every manor, land, heir and tenure.
Pass Added: 76
John Colt livery 5 November 1485 Norfolk Trusbut lands
Variant / Search Form: John Colt livery 5 November 1485 Norfolk Trusbut lands
Notes: Find the primary livery/wardship record and determine whether Norfolk Trusbut estates are expressly listed.
Pass Added: 76
Thomas Colt Jane Trusbut marriage settlement Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Colt Jane Trusbut marriage settlement Norfolk
Notes: Search marriage settlements, fines, feoffments and Chancery for the actual heiress-property transmission.
Pass Added: 76
1413 Runcton Holme lease 1597 Watlington Coltes Trusbuttes
Variant / Search Form: 1413 Runcton Holme lease 1597 Watlington Coltes Trusbuttes
Notes: Test locality continuity from Laurence's Runcton holding to the Colt estate without assuming parcel identity.
Pass Added: 76
John Trusbut Runcton Holme Jane heiress Thomas Colt
Variant / Search Form: John Trusbut Runcton Holme Jane heiress Thomas Colt
Notes: Target the missing father-daughter-heiress proof and estate schedule.
Pass Added: 76
Nicholas Colt Thomas Colt Trusbut correction primary
Variant / Search Form: Nicholas Colt Thomas Colt Trusbut correction primary
Notes: Resolve the later Nicholas-vs-Thomas conflict from operative records; visitation presently favours Thomas.
Pass Added: 76
Joan wife Sir William Parre 15 Edward IV 34 IPM
Variant / Search Form: Joan wife Sir William Parre 15 Edward IV 34 IPM
Notes: Recover the actual IPM/calendar entry and extract every manor, land, county, tenure, heir and age.
Pass Added: 77
Inquisition 15 Edw IV no 34 Joan Parr Colt
Variant / Search Form: Inquisition 15 Edw IV no 34 Joan Parr Colt
Notes: Search old Calendarium/CIPM indexes and TNA C 140 files for the specific numbered inquisition.
Pass Added: 77
John Colt ward Sir William Parr 1 Henry VII
Variant / Search Form: John Colt ward Sir William Parr 1 Henry VII
Notes: Recover the wardship grant/account showing the legal custody immediately before livery.
Pass Added: 77
John Colt 5 November 1485 livery Fine Roll
Variant / Search Form: John Colt 5 November 1485 livery Fine Roll
Notes: Find the Fine Roll/Chancery order giving livery and identify all counties/property released.
Pass Added: 77
John Colt livery 1 Henry VII escheator Norfolk Suffolk Essex
Variant / Search Form: John Colt livery 1 Henry VII escheator Norfolk Suffolk Essex
Notes: Search county escheator orders following the reported 5 Nov 1485 livery.
Pass Added: 77
John Trusbut Runcton Holme Burke Peerage source
Variant / Search Form: John Trusbut Runcton Holme Burke Peerage source
Notes: Trace BP2003 p.862 backwards to the older heraldic/genealogical source for Joan's father and seat.
Pass Added: 77
Johanna Trusbut daughter John Trusbut Holme early pedigree
Variant / Search Form: Johanna Trusbut daughter John Trusbut Holme early pedigree
Notes: Find a pre-modern or manuscript pedigree explicitly naming John and Holme/Runcton Holme.
Pass Added: 77
Joan Trusbut IPM Norfolk Watlington Runcton Holme
Variant / Search Form: Joan Trusbut IPM Norfolk Watlington Runcton Holme
Notes: Test whether Joan's IPM contains the Norfolk estate needed to link the medieval fee to Colt.
Pass Added: 77
John Colt heir Joan Parr Cavendish 13 Edward IV
Variant / Search Form: John Colt heir Joan Parr Cavendish 13 Edward IV
Notes: Recover independent heirship/wardship evidence around Joan's death, not merely Copinger's summary.
Pass Added: 77
John Colt ward Parr Elrington transfer wardship 1470s
Variant / Search Form: John Colt ward Parr Elrington transfer wardship 1470s
Notes: Search for the claimed later transfer/sale of John Colt's wardship from Parr to John Elrington.
Pass Added: 77
C 140 Joan Parr 15 Edward IV Colt
Variant / Search Form: C 140 Joan Parr 15 Edward IV Colt
Notes: Target Chancery IPM series/shelfmark conversion from the old numbered reference.
Pass Added: 77
5 Nov 1485 John Colt Norfolk estate livery Trusbut
Variant / Search Form: 5 Nov 1485 John Colt Norfolk estate livery Trusbut
Notes: Use exact date plus Norfolk locality terms to locate any royal order or escheator return.
Pass Added: 77
Joan Parre 15 Edward IV 34 Watlington Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre 15 Edward IV 34 Watlington Norfolk
Notes: Search the same IPM number with the critical Norfolk place-name rather than only Joan's name.
Pass Added: 78
Joan Parre 15 Edward IV 34 Runcton Holme
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre 15 Edward IV 34 Runcton Holme
Notes: Test whether Runcton Holme appears in independent abstracts of the same IPM.
Pass Added: 78
Joan Parre 15 Edward IV 34 Shouldham Tottenhill Setchey
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre 15 Edward IV 34 Shouldham Tottenhill Setchey
Notes: Search the recurring Trusbut fee localities against the exact IPM reference.
Pass Added: 78
Joan wife William Parre Clayhall Cavendish IPM
Variant / Search Form: Joan wife William Parre Clayhall Cavendish IPM
Notes: Find additional county histories quoting other estates from the same IPM.
Pass Added: 78
Esch 15 Edw IV no 34 Joan Parre manor
Variant / Search Form: Esch 15 Edw IV no 34 Joan Parre manor
Notes: Recover other manor-by-manor quotations from antiquarian county histories.
Pass Added: 78
C 140 Joan Parre Clayhall 15 Edw IV 34
Variant / Search Form: C 140 Joan Parre Clayhall 15 Edw IV 34
Notes: Convert the old escheat/IPM citation to a modern TNA C 140 piece and membrane.
Pass Added: 78
John Colte Clayhall 1475 heir Joan Parr
Variant / Search Form: John Colte Clayhall 1475 heir Joan Parr
Notes: Trace Clayhall title before Joan to determine whether it came through Thomas Colt, Joan herself, or another route.
Pass Added: 78
Joan Trusbut Clayhall title acquisition Thomas Colt
Variant / Search Form: Joan Trusbut Clayhall title acquisition Thomas Colt
Notes: Avoid assuming Clayhall was Trusbut-derived; identify its pre-1473 conveyance chain.
Pass Added: 78
John Colt 5 Nov 1485 Clayhall livery
Variant / Search Form: John Colt 5 Nov 1485 Clayhall livery
Notes: Test whether the reported royal livery includes the Essex manor now known from Joan's IPM trail.
Pass Added: 78
John Colt 5 Nov 1485 Cavendish Clayhall Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: John Colt 5 Nov 1485 Cavendish Clayhall Norfolk
Notes: Search the reported livery using the two now-established inherited estate names plus Norfolk.
Pass Added: 78
Monday before St Lawrence 13 Edward IV Joan Parr
Variant / Search Form: Monday before St Lawrence 13 Edward IV Joan Parr
Notes: Confirm the 4 Aug 1473 death-date reconstruction from independent calendrical/genealogical sources.
Pass Added: 78
Joan Parr IPM 1475 Clayhall Norfolk estate schedule
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parr IPM 1475 Clayhall Norfolk estate schedule
Notes: Use Clayhall as a unique hook for locating a fuller transcript/index of the same IPM.
Pass Added: 78
Joan Parre Calendarium IV 15 Edward IV 34
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre Calendarium IV 15 Edward IV 34
Notes: Read the actual Record Commission land-list entry in the scanned Calendarium, not just later county histories.
Pass Added: 79
Calendarium vol 4 Joan Parre Colte 15 Edw IV no 34
Variant / Search Form: Calendarium vol 4 Joan Parre Colte 15 Edw IV no 34
Notes: Search spelling variants across Google Books/HathiTrust/scan OCR and index pages.
Pass Added: 79
C 140 Joan Parre 15 Edward IV no 34 modern reference
Variant / Search Form: C 140 Joan Parre 15 Edward IV no 34 modern reference
Notes: Convert the old Calendarium number to the modern C140 file/item and retrieve the original.
Pass Added: 79
E 149 Joan Parre 15 Edward IV 34
Variant / Search Form: E 149 Joan Parre 15 Edward IV 34
Notes: Search for any Exchequer duplicate/counterpart if the Chancery return is difficult or incomplete.
Pass Added: 79
Joan Parre Suffolks Clayhall Cavendish 15 Edw IV 34
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre Suffolks Clayhall Cavendish 15 Edw IV 34
Notes: Use all three known estates as hooks to locate a fuller abstract/transcript of the same IPM.
Pass Added: 79
Joan Parre Watlington Runcton Holme C140
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre Watlington Runcton Holme C140
Notes: Search Norfolk localities against Joan's name in the correct Edward-IV Chancery series.
Pass Added: 79
Joan Parre Shouldham Tottenhill Setchey C140 E149
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre Shouldham Tottenhill Setchey C140 E149
Notes: Test recurring Trusbut localities against both surviving IPM series.
Pass Added: 79
John Colt 5 November 1485 Patent Roll C66
Variant / Search Form: John Colt 5 November 1485 Patent Roll C66
Notes: Corrected livery priority per TNA: search Patent Rolls for the reported delivery of lands.
Pass Added: 79
John Colte livery 1 Henry VII Patent Rolls 1485 1494
Variant / Search Form: John Colte livery 1 Henry VII Patent Rolls 1485 1494
Notes: Search spelling and regnal-year variants in CPR Henry VII vol.1.
Pass Added: 79
John Colt Clayhall Cavendish Patent Roll 1485
Variant / Search Form: John Colt Clayhall Cavendish Patent Roll 1485
Notes: Use two known inherited estates as hooks in Patent Roll calendars for the livery entry.
Pass Added: 79
John Colt wardship Sir William Parr C66 1 Henry VII
Variant / Search Form: John Colt wardship Sir William Parr C66 1 Henry VII
Notes: Search sale/termination of wardship and livery records in Patent Rolls after Joan's IPM.
Pass Added: 79
List and Index Society 268 Joan Parre C140
Variant / Search Form: List and Index Society 268 Joan Parre C140
Notes: Use the later name/shelfmark list for 1447-1485 to map Joan's old no.34 to modern C140 reference.
Pass Added: 79
Joan Parre 15 Edward IV Norfolk possessions Rogers
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre 15 Edward IV Norfolk possessions Rogers
Notes: Trace Rogers' underlying source for the explicit Norfolk county list and identify the actual Norfolk manors.
Pass Added: 80
Johanna wife William Parre fifteenth year Norfolk Berkshire Middlesex Essex Suffolk
Variant / Search Form: Johanna wife William Parre fifteenth year Norfolk Berkshire Middlesex Essex Suffolk
Notes: Search exact Rogers wording across Google Books, HathiTrust, Calendarium and old county histories.
Pass Added: 80
Calendarium 15 Edw IV 34 Norfolk Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: Calendarium 15 Edw IV 34 Norfolk Joan Parre
Notes: Extract the exact no.34 entry and all Norfolk place names from the scanned 1828 volume.
Pass Added: 80
C140 Joan Parre Norfolk 15 Edward IV 34
Variant / Search Form: C140 Joan Parre Norfolk 15 Edward IV 34
Notes: Map the fifteenth-year record to modern Chancery IPM piece/item and recover the Norfolk return.
Pass Added: 80
E149 Joan Parre Norfolk 15 Edward IV
Variant / Search Form: E149 Joan Parre Norfolk 15 Edward IV
Notes: Check Exchequer counterpart for county returns omitted/unclear in C140.
Pass Added: 80
John Trusbut Shingham Norfolk Joan Colt
Variant / Search Form: John Trusbut Shingham Norfolk Joan Colt
Notes: Find pre-modern or primary evidence for Gough's Shingham father/seat attribution.
Pass Added: 80
John Trusbut Runcton Holme Shingham conflict
Variant / Search Form: John Trusbut Runcton Holme Shingham conflict
Notes: Resolve whether one man held both places, whether sources refer to different Johns, or whether one seat attribution is erroneous.
Pass Added: 80
Thomas Trusbut Shingham will 1451 Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trusbut Shingham will 1451 Norfolk
Notes: Target the missing will/probate/title bridge that may explain the Shingham seat and Joan's father.
Pass Added: 80
Shingham Trusbut Tittleshall Shouldham 15th century
Variant / Search Form: Shingham Trusbut Tittleshall Shouldham 15th century
Notes: Trace Trusbut land/title connections among Shingham, Shouldham and Tittleshall without assuming identity.
Pass Added: 80
Roydon brass Colt impaling Trusbut John Trusbut Shingham
Variant / Search Form: Roydon brass Colt impaling Trusbut John Trusbut Shingham
Notes: Find earlier rubbings, church notes, heraldic visitations or monument transcripts to corroborate Gough.
Pass Added: 80
John Colt livery 5 Nov 1485 Norfolk C66 Patent Roll
Variant / Search Form: John Colt livery 5 Nov 1485 Norfolk C66 Patent Roll
Notes: Continue livery search now that Norfolk presence in Joan's fifteenth-year inquisition is explicitly stated.
Pass Added: 80
Materials History Henry VII vol 1 p 127 Thomas Colt
Variant / Search Form: Materials History Henry VII vol 1 p 127 Thomas Colt
Notes: Follow Rogers' specific Rolls Series retrieval lead for Thomas/John Colt notices and possible estate/livery records.
Pass Added: 80
Raughton Cumberland Joan Parr Runcton Holme control
Variant / Search Form: Raughton Cumberland Joan Parr Runcton Holme control
Notes: Keep the 13 Edw IV Raughton Cumberland property separate from Runcton Holme Norfolk in all future searches.
Pass Added: 80
Joan Parr IPM Norfolk Watlington Shouldham Runcton Shingham
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parr IPM Norfolk Watlington Shouldham Runcton Shingham
Notes: Use all four Norfolk candidate localities against C140/E149/Calendarium and old county histories.
Pass Added: 80
Calendarium IV 15 Edward IV no 34 Joan Parre Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: Calendarium IV 15 Edward IV no 34 Joan Parre Norfolk
Notes: Highest priority unchanged: extract the actual printed land list and all Norfolk names.
Pass Added: 81
C140 Joan wife William Parre Norfolk no 34
Variant / Search Form: C140 Joan wife William Parre Norfolk no 34
Notes: Map old numbered entry to modern C140 piece/item and obtain original Norfolk return.
Pass Added: 81
E149 Joan Parre Norfolk Colt
Variant / Search Form: E149 Joan Parre Norfolk Colt
Notes: Check Exchequer counterpart for duplicate/additional Norfolk detail.
Pass Added: 81
Joan Parre Norfolk Shingham IPM
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre Norfolk Shingham IPM
Notes: Test Gough's Shingham seat directly against the fifteenth-year estate return.
Pass Added: 81
Joan Parre Norfolk Holme IPM
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre Norfolk Holme IPM
Notes: Test the unspecific Holme tradition without presuming Runcton.
Pass Added: 81
Joan Parre Norfolk Runcton Holme IPM
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre Norfolk Runcton Holme IPM
Notes: Test BP2003-derived Runcton wording independently.
Pass Added: 81
John Trusbut Shingham Holme Runcton will
Variant / Search Form: John Trusbut Shingham Holme Runcton will
Notes: Search one query with all competing seat forms for a will/probate/deed that resolves the conflict.
Pass Added: 81
John Colt 5 November 1485 C66 Patent Rolls
Variant / Search Form: John Colt 5 November 1485 C66 Patent Rolls
Notes: Continue primary livery search; Rogers Materials p127 route is now closed as unrelated.
Pass Added: 81
John Colte Clayhall Suffolks Cavendish Patent Roll 1485
Variant / Search Form: John Colte Clayhall Suffolks Cavendish Patent Roll 1485
Notes: Use known inherited estate hooks to find livery/wardship termination.
Pass Added: 81
Thomas Colt Roger Thorpe Campbell Materials 127
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Colt Roger Thorpe Campbell Materials 127
Notes: Source-control only: reconstruct Thomas Colt's political career if needed, not the Joan/John estate bridge.
Pass Added: 81
Suffolk visitation 1561 Trusbut Norfolk Shingham Holme
Variant / Search Form: Suffolk visitation 1561 Trusbut Norfolk Shingham Holme
Notes: Check manuscript/variant copies for any marginal father or seat omitted in Metcalfe print.
Pass Added: 81
Harley MS 1177 Trusbut Shingham Holme Runcton
Variant / Search Form: Harley MS 1177 Trusbut Shingham Holme Runcton
Notes: Inspect the manuscript visitation copy for wording beyond generic 'of Norfolk'.
Pass Added: 81
C 140/52/13 Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52/13 Joan Parre
Notes: Exact modern Chancery-reference search fixed by VCH; seek Discovery metadata, images, transcripts or citations.
Pass Added: 82
C140/52/13 Joan Colt Clayhall
Variant / Search Form: C140/52/13 Joan Colt Clayhall
Notes: Cross-check VCH's archival reference against Joan/Clayhall/Colt forms.
Pass Added: 82
Joan Parre Boxstead 15 Edw IV 34
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre Boxstead 15 Edw IV 34
Notes: Recover further references/transcriptions for the new Boxstead Manor estate context.
Pass Added: 82
Joan Parre Peytones Peyton Hall 15 Edw IV 34
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre Peytones Peyton Hall 15 Edw IV 34
Notes: Recover further references/transcriptions for Copinger's Peyton/Peytones Manor context.
Pass Added: 82
MS Ch Norfolk 340 Joan Parre [REJECTED — Pass 83]
Variant / Search Form: MS Ch Norfolk 340 Joan Parre [REJECTED — Pass 83]
Notes: Pass 82 search-result concatenation error. MS. Ch. Norfolk 340 is a later Corbett indenture; Joan's writ is Ch./MS. Ch. Norfolk 339.
Pass Added: 82
"28 January" "17 Edward IV" Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: "28 January" "17 Edward IV" Joan Parre
Notes: Search the later Joan inquisition commission/writ independently of shelfmark.
Pass Added: 82
C 140/52/13 Shingham
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52/13 Shingham
Notes: Test the modern Chancery target against Gough's specific seat form without normalising it.
Pass Added: 82
C 140/52/13 Holme Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52/13 Holme Norfolk
Notes: Test generic Holme independently from Runcton Holme.
Pass Added: 82
C 140/52/13 Runcton Holme
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52/13 Runcton Holme
Notes: Test modern Runcton-Holme tradition against the fixed Chancery target.
Pass Added: 82
C 140/52/13 Watlington
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52/13 Watlington
Notes: Test Watlington independently against Joan's modern Chancery target.
Pass Added: 82
C 140/52/13 Shouldham Tottenhill Setchey
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52/13 Shouldham Tottenhill Setchey
Notes: Test core Trusbut territorial places against the fixed Chancery target.
Pass Added: 82
C 140/52/13 Norfolk E 149 Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52/13 Norfolk E 149 Joan Parre
Notes: Search for Norfolk return and Exchequer counterpart once modern Chancery target is fixed.
Pass Added: 82
MS Ch Norfolk 339 Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: MS Ch Norfolk 339 Joan Parre
Notes: Corrected Bodleian shelfmark; retrieve/order exact 1478 writ.
Pass Added: 83
Ch 339 John Tymperley Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: Ch 339 John Tymperley Joan Parre
Notes: Use the 1878 calendar's exact old charter number and named escheator.
Pass Added: 83
John Tymperley escheator Norfolk Suffolk Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: John Tymperley escheator Norfolk Suffolk Joan Parre
Notes: Search administrative/escheator records rather than repeat family biographies.
Pass Added: 83
C 140/52 no. 34 Joan Parre Colte
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52 no. 34 Joan Parre Colte
Notes: Safe VCH Roydon retrieval form; do not assume /13 is the complete packet.
Pass Added: 83
C 140/52/13 Joan Parre source conflict
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52/13 Joan Parre source conflict
Notes: Resolve whether /13 is a specific return/sub-item, citation issue, or separate arrangement.
Pass Added: 83
E 149 Joan Parre John Tymperley Norfolk Suffolk
Variant / Search Form: E 149 Joan Parre John Tymperley Norfolk Suffolk
Notes: Search Exchequer counterpart using the newly recovered escheator name.
Pass Added: 83
15 Edw IV Joan Parre Norfolk Suffolk escheator return
Variant / Search Form: 15 Edw IV Joan Parre Norfolk Suffolk escheator return
Notes: Target separate county returns under joint Norfolk/Suffolk escheatry.
Pass Added: 83
John Tymperley 15 Edw IV inquisition return Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: John Tymperley 15 Edw IV inquisition return Norfolk
Notes: Look for return/endorsement evidence and not general Tymperley genealogy.
Pass Added: 83
E 152 Joan Parre Norfolk 15 Edw IV
Variant / Search Form: E 152 Joan Parre Norfolk 15 Edw IV
Notes: New Pass-84 Exchequer-enrolment route for a damaged/missing Norfolk return.
Pass Added: 84
E 153 Joan Parre John Tymperley Norfolk Suffolk
Variant / Search Form: E 153 Joan Parre John Tymperley Norfolk Suffolk
Notes: Search residual escheators' files; do not assume all IPM material was removed to E149/E152.
Pass Added: 84
E 136 John Tymperley escheator 15 Edw IV Norfolk Suffolk
Variant / Search Form: E 136 John Tymperley escheator 15 Edw IV Norfolk Suffolk
Notes: Search particulars of account for return/account clues or damaged-text reconstruction.
Pass Added: 84
E 357 John Tymperley escheator account 1475 Norfolk Suffolk
Variant / Search Form: E 357 John Tymperley escheator account 1475 Norfolk Suffolk
Notes: Search enrolled escheator accounts as a secondary reconstruction/control route.
Pass Added: 84
C 140/52 E 152 Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52 E 152 Joan Parre
Notes: Cross-search the safe Chancery piece with Exchequer enrolments.
Pass Added: 84
C 140/52 E 153 Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52 E 153 Joan Parre
Notes: Cross-search residual escheator files after C140/E149.
Pass Added: 84
C 140/52 Norfolk return E 149 E 152
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52 Norfolk return E 149 E 152
Notes: Treat Norfolk and Suffolk returns separately; an E149 duplicate may survive for only one county.
Pass Added: 84
C 139/99/38 Norfolk Suffolk Tymperle
Variant / Search Form: C 139/99/38 Norfolk Suffolk Tymperle
Notes: Pass-84 procedural comparator: one joint writ produced separate county returns.
Pass Added: 84
E 149/167/6 m.3 Norfolk Suffolk comparator
Variant / Search Form: E 149/167/6 m.3 Norfolk Suffolk comparator
Notes: Reference-table control: Suffolk duplicate exists while the paired Norfolk return has no listed E149 duplicate.
Pass Added: 84
Joan Parre missing Norfolk return E149 E152 E153 E136 E357
Variant / Search Form: Joan Parre missing Norfolk return E149 E152 E153 E136 E357
Notes: Expanded archive ladder; evidence-led retrieval rather than repeated genealogy searching.
Pass Added: 84
C 140/52/34 Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52/34 Joan Parre
Notes: Leading exact modern item mapping inferred from documented old-to-modern numbering scheme; direct TNA item still to verify.
Pass Added: 85
C 140/52/34 Joan Colte Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52/34 Joan Colte Norfolk
Notes: Search the leading exact item with widow/relict surname form and Norfolk.
Pass Added: 85
15 Edw IV no.34 C 140/52/34
Variant / Search Form: 15 Edw IV no.34 C 140/52/34
Notes: Old Calendarium number crosswalk to the leading modern three-part reference.
Pass Added: 85
C 140/52/13 versus C 140/52/34
Variant / Search Form: C 140/52/13 versus C 140/52/34
Notes: Resolve VCH Barking /13 against Roydon no.34 and the documented modern numbering convention.
Pass Added: 85
E 501/15-18 Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: E 501/15-18 Joan Parre
Notes: Exact TNA Index Nominum shelfmark route for E149/E152/E153 duplicate identification.
Pass Added: 85
Index Nominum Escheators Inquisitions Joan Parre Colte
Variant / Search Form: Index Nominum Escheators Inquisitions Joan Parre Colte
Notes: Search the four-volume finding aid under surname and marital variants.
Pass Added: 85
Trinity College Oxford MSS 61-62 Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: Trinity College Oxford MSS 61-62 Joan Parre
Notes: Early IPM inventory terminating at 15 Edward IV; check crown-held property/heir summary.
Pass Added: 85
Trinity MSS 61 62 15 Edward IV Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: Trinity MSS 61 62 15 Edward IV Norfolk
Notes: County/property route into the c.1476-era Chancery archive inventory.
Pass Added: 85
Rawlinson B.231 Joan Parre
Variant / Search Form: Rawlinson B.231 Joan Parre
Notes: Early Bodleian IPM-survival inventory; check tenant and county entries.
Pass Added: 85
Rawlinson B.231 Norfolk 15 Edward IV
Variant / Search Form: Rawlinson B.231 Norfolk 15 Edward IV
Notes: Search independent county-coverage evidence for the Joan-period IPM packet.
Pass Added: 85
Walter Rye Norfolk inquisitions 15 Edw IV no34 Joan Parr
Variant / Search Form: Walter Rye Norfolk inquisitions 15 Edw IV no34 Joan Parr
Notes: Norfolk-specific index test; no34 is absent while no33/no63 are present.
Pass Added: 86
Norfolk Records 15 Edw IV no34 Parr Colt Trusbut
Variant / Search Form: Norfolk Records 15 Edw IV no34 Parr Colt Trusbut
Notes: Negative-control search across Rye's collected Norfolk IPM index.
Pass Added: 86
Thomas Trussbut Register Aleyn fol 163
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trussbut Register Aleyn fol 163
Notes: Exact probate-register citation recovered from Parkin.
Pass Added: 86
NRO Norwich Consistory Court Aleyn 163 Thomas Trussbut
Variant / Search Form: NRO Norwich Consistory Court Aleyn 163 Thomas Trussbut
Notes: Order/retrieve the original will/register entry.
Pass Added: 86
Thomas Trussbut 31 Dec 1451 Tytelsale Hall Shingham
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trussbut 31 Dec 1451 Tytelsale Hall Shingham
Notes: Detailed will-extract form; preserve Shingham conflict.
Pass Added: 86
Thomas Trussbut will Watlington Thorpland Tottenhill Setchey Fincham
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trussbut will Watlington Thorpland Tottenhill Setchey Fincham
Notes: Broader estate wording tying the 1451 succession to the Watlington-linked geography.
Pass Added: 86
William Trussbut Shouldham died s.p. Jane niece
Variant / Search Form: William Trussbut Shouldham died s.p. Jane niece
Notes: Exact Shouldham succession mechanism.
Pass Added: 86
Jane daughter heir John Trussbut Thomas Colt
Variant / Search Form: Jane daughter heir John Trussbut Thomas Colt
Notes: Heiress-to-Colt marriage bridge.
Pass Added: 86
John Colt livery Tittleshall Holme 1 Henry VII
Variant / Search Form: John Colt livery Tittleshall Holme 1 Henry VII
Notes: Primary-derived livery occurrence and inherited manor identity.
Pass Added: 86
John Colt 5 Nov 1485 C66 Tittleshall
Variant / Search Form: John Colt 5 Nov 1485 C66 Tittleshall
Notes: Exact date remains secondary-only; continue royal-record check if desired.
Pass Added: 86
Parkin Shingham John William Trussbut conflict
Variant / Search Form: Parkin Shingham John William Trussbut conflict
Notes: Internal source conflict: detailed will extract says John, Shingham narrative says William.
Pass Added: 86
Tittleshall alias Trusbutts Watlington Colts inheritance package
Variant / Search Form: Tittleshall alias Trusbutts Watlington Colts inheritance package
Notes: Compare separate manor identities inside the same Trusbut/Colt estate package without conflation.
Pass Added: 86
NCC will register Aleyn 163 Thomas Trussbut
Variant / Search Form: NCC will register Aleyn 163 Thomas Trussbut
Notes: Leading NRO catalogue-form target inferred from documented Aleyn row naming; exact row still to verify.
Pass Added: 87
FamilySearch DGS 008076270 Aleyn folio 163
Variant / Search Form: FamilySearch DGS 008076270 Aleyn folio 163
Notes: Browse/search Aleyn-period digital images for Thomas's exact folio; do not reuse image 261 from unrelated fol.19v.
Pass Added: 87
Thomas Trussbut Aleyn 163 DGS 008076270
Variant / Search Form: Thomas Trussbut Aleyn 163 DGS 008076270
Notes: Exact manuscript retrieval combination.
Pass Added: 87
Shouldham tithe map Colts Hall plot number
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham tithe map Colts Hall plot number
Notes: Read plot numbers at Colts Hall/Homestall/Further Homestall from NCC digital tithe map.
Pass Added: 87
Shouldham 1843 tithe Homestall Further Homestall apportionment
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham 1843 tithe Homestall Further Homestall apportionment
Notes: After plot-number extraction, order owner/occupier/field/acreage entries from NRO.
Pass Added: 87
Norfolk tithe apportionment Shouldham Colt's Hall
Variant / Search Form: Norfolk tithe apportionment Shouldham Colt's Hall
Notes: Official apportionment is not digitised; parish + plot number required.
Pass Added: 87
HARE 6832 versus HARE 5185 Shouldham map
Variant / Search Form: HARE 6832 versus HARE 5185 Shouldham map
Notes: Keep Historic England's HARE 6832 and CBTM's HARE 5185 231x2 as separate archive references until compared.
Pass Added: 87
HARE 5185 231x2 Downham Market extract Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: HARE 5185 231x2 Downham Market extract Shouldham
Notes: Source-control: CBTM downloadable PDF is a Downham Market extract, not visual proof of the Shouldham section.
Pass Added: 87
ncc_tithe tile 12 61436 85456
Variant / Search Form: ncc_tithe tile 12 61436 85456
Notes: Exact cached 1:500 tithe tile containing Colt's Hall from official BNG coordinate/service parameters.
Pass Added: 88
Shouldham tithe row 61436 col 85456
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham tithe row 61436 col 85456
Notes: Machine retrieval route for reading the map plot numbers around Colt's Hall/Homestall.
Pass Added: 88
ncc_tithe 61435 61436 61437 85455 85456 85457
Variant / Search Form: ncc_tithe 61435 61436 61437 85455 85456 85457
Notes: 3x3 neighbouring-tile grid for the broader Colts core if the Hall tile alone is insufficient.
Pass Added: 88
Charles Lemmon Shouldham tithe Sir Thomas Hare
Variant / Search Form: Charles Lemmon Shouldham tithe Sir Thomas Hare
Notes: Test the strongest current owner/occupier model against the actual 1843 apportionment.
Pass Added: 88
Charles Lemmon Colts Hall owner occupier 1843
Variant / Search Form: Charles Lemmon Colts Hall owner occupier 1843
Notes: Do not infer tenure from directory wording; locate the tithe entry.
Pass Added: 88
HARE 2826 full digital copy Shouldham field book 1440 1441
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2826 full digital copy Shouldham field book 1440 1441
Notes: Obtain the complete conserved field book, not merely the two map folios.
Pass Added: 88
HARE 2826 fol 16v 34v diagrammatic field strips
Variant / Search Form: HARE 2826 fol 16v 34v diagrammatic field strips
Notes: Exact medieval map folios confirmed by scholarship and NRO conservation report.
Pass Added: 88
Shouldham field book 1440-1 conservation Norfolk Record Office
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham field book 1440-1 conservation Norfolk Record Office
Notes: Institutional physical-survival/control route.
Pass Added: 88
Shouldham Inclosure Act 1794 34 Geo 3 c 85 Pr
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Inclosure Act 1794 34 Geo 3 c 85 Pr
Notes: Exact statutory citation now attached to the existing parliamentary/enclosure record.
Pass Added: 88
Shouldham 1796 Cherry Close New Close Thomas Hare road Watlington
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham 1796 Cherry Close New Close Thomas Hare road Watlington
Notes: Existing enclosure record enrichment only; do not recount as a new source.
Pass Added: 88
Shouldham IR 30 tithe map
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham IR 30 tithe map
Notes: Locate the exact TNA commissioner-copy map reference for Shouldham; then use the numbered plot around Colt's Hall/Homestall.
Pass Added: 89
Shouldham IR 29 tithe apportionment
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham IR 29 tithe apportionment
Notes: Locate the exact TNA commissioner-copy apportionment reference and retrieve owner/occupier/field/acreage for the Colts plot numbers.
Pass Added: 89
Shouldham TheGenealogist tithe 1843
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham TheGenealogist tithe 1843
Notes: Alternative online image route confirmed by TNA; use only after locating the correct Shouldham record/plot.
Pass Added: 89
Shouldham IR 18 tithe file
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham IR 18 tithe file
Notes: Fallback administrative file route if map/apportionment access or coverage is incomplete; may explain survey limitations or commutation details.
Pass Added: 89
IR 127/8/450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 Norfolk LVII.7
Variant / Search Form: IR 127/8/450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 Norfolk LVII.7
Notes: Test the newly identified King's Lynn accessioned plan run against the first Shouldham 25-inch sheet; do not assume match.
Pass Added: 90
IR 127/8/450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 Norfolk XLV.16
Variant / Search Form: IR 127/8/450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 Norfolk XLV.16
Notes: Test the newly identified King's Lynn accessioned plan run against the second Shouldham 25-inch sheet; do not assume match.
Pass Added: 90
IR 127/8 450-458 Shouldham King's Lynn valuation plan
Variant / Search Form: IR 127/8 450-458 Shouldham King's Lynn valuation plan
Notes: Piece-range cross-check; if negative continue through the full IR 127/8 hierarchy.
Pass Added: 90
Shouldham P/DLV/1 Duties on Land Values
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham P/DLV/1 Duties on Land Values
Notes: Locate Norfolk Record Office local valuation/precis schedule for the income-tax parish covering Shouldham.
Pass Added: 90
Shouldham Thorpe P/DLV/1 valuation 1910
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Thorpe P/DLV/1 valuation 1910
Notes: Test whether Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe were indexed separately or within another income-tax parish.
Pass Added: 90
Colts Hall P/DLV valuation book 1910
Variant / Search Form: Colts Hall P/DLV valuation book 1910
Notes: Property-name search only; a negative result does not replace parish/sheet search.
Pass Added: 90
Shouldham income tax parish Valuation Office IR58
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham income tax parish Valuation Office IR58
Notes: Identify the survey's income-tax parish name before field-book retrieval.
Pass Added: 90
TheGenealogist Lloyd George Norfolk current coverage
Variant / Search Form: TheGenealogist Lloyd George Norfolk current coverage
Notes: Recheck future release status before later passes; Pass 90 confirms Norfolk is not currently released.
Pass Added: 90
Shouldham IR 23 1798 Land Tax assessment
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham IR 23 1798 Land Tax assessment
Notes: Locate the exact TNA item/folio and read proprietor + principal tenant entries.
Pass Added: 91
Shouldham Thorpe Garboise Thorpe IR 23 1798
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham Thorpe Garboise Thorpe IR 23 1798
Notes: Search the Thorpe parish separately; old place-name forms may index independently.
Pass Added: 91
Clackclose C/Scd 2 Shouldham 1767 1832
Variant / Search Form: Clackclose C/Scd 2 Shouldham 1767 1832
Notes: Locate the exact NRO division/bundle sub-reference rather than guessing the sequence number.
Pass Added: 91
Shouldham land tax 1767 1772 1780 1794 1798 1811 1822 1832
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham land tax 1767 1772 1780 1794 1798 1811 1822 1832
Notes: Build a longitudinal proprietor/occupier change table across enclosure and early estate mapping.
Pass Added: 91
Shouldham IR 22 Parish Book Redemptions Hare
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham IR 22 Parish Book Redemptions Hare
Notes: If IR 23 shows a redemption/register number, trace it into IR 22.
Pass Added: 91
Shouldham IR 24 Redemption Certificate Hare
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham IR 24 Redemption Certificate Hare
Notes: Retrieve fuller property/tenant description only if a matching redemption contract exists.
Pass Added: 91
Norfolk Family History Society 1798 Clackclose Land Tax typescript Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: Norfolk Family History Society 1798 Clackclose Land Tax typescript Shouldham
Notes: Use the reported indexed typescript as a rapid name/index route, then verify against original assessment.
Pass Added: 91
Charles Lemmon Shouldham farmer parish register 1822 1859
Variant / Search Form: Charles Lemmon Shouldham farmer parish register 1822 1859
Notes: Occupation continuity only; do not turn parish farming into Colts Hall ownership.
Pass Added: 91
HARE 5466 Charles Lemmon Colts Farm 1875
Variant / Search Form: HARE 5466 Charles Lemmon Colts Farm 1875
Notes: Test the newly established 1875 Charles-Lemmon-at-Colts-Hall evidence against the original Colts Farm schedule; extract tenant, acreage, rent and proprietary wording.
Pass Added: 92
Colts Farm Shouldham 1875 Sir Thomas Hare Charles Lemmon
Variant / Search Form: Colts Farm Shouldham 1875 Sir Thomas Hare Charles Lemmon
Notes: Same-period synthesis search only; do not count directory repetition as new unless it supplies a new parcel/title fact.
Pass Added: 92
"PD 356/129" Shouldham Village Hall
Variant / Search Form: "PD 356/129" Shouldham Village Hall
Notes: Resolve exact NRO item title/date/parties; determine whether it is deed, minutes, plan, faculty, lease or other parish record.
Pass Added: 93
"Shouldham Village Hall" "7 June 1930" declaration trust donor
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham Village Hall" "7 June 1930" declaration trust donor
Notes: Find grantor/donor/lessor and property description from full trust deed.
Pass Added: 93
"Shouldham Village Hall Trust" "Land Registry" title
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham Village Hall Trust" "Land Registry" title
Notes: Recover current title number/proprietor/lease if publicly indexed; otherwise target official register/plan.
Pass Added: 93
"Further Homestall" Shouldham Village Hall 1930
Variant / Search Form: "Further Homestall" Shouldham Village Hall 1930
Notes: Crosswalk trust/hall footprint to the Batchelors/Further Homestall historic parcel rather than assuming the whole close was transferred.
Pass Added: 93
"Colts Hall" "21 The Green" Shouldham planning
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "21 The Green" Shouldham planning
Notes: Exact current address + planning-file route
Pass Added: 95
"Colts Hall 21 The Green Shouldham" ownership certificate
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall 21 The Green Shouldham" ownership certificate
Notes: Planning Certificate A/B owner-tracing route
Pass Added: 95
site:west-norfolk.gov.uk "Colts Hall" Shouldham planning
Variant / Search Form: site:west-norfolk.gov.uk "Colts Hall" Shouldham planning
Notes: Official Borough Council application-search route
Pass Added: 95
"Colts Hall" Shouldham "Trees in a Conservation Area"
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" Shouldham "Trees in a Conservation Area"
Notes: Exact 20 Nov 2025 tree-notice wording route
Pass Added: 95
"Colts Hall" Shouldham HMLR title
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" Shouldham HMLR title
Notes: Exact-address HMLR/title-search route
Pass Added: 95
"21 The Green" Shouldham Land Registry
Variant / Search Form: "21 The Green" Shouldham Land Registry
Notes: Address-only modern title/index-map route
Pass Added: 95
2/TPO/00673 / King George Playing Field / Grey Poplar
Variant / Search Form: 2/TPO/00673 / King George Playing Field / Grey Poplar
Notes: PASS 98 CORRECTION CONTROL: this application belongs to King George Playing Field, Fairstead Drove, Shouldham — NOT Colts Hall. Do not reuse 2/TPO/00673 as a Colts Hall reference.
Pass Added: 98
Colts Hall / 21 The Green / T1 T2 lime trees / conservation area / 20 Nov 2025
Variant / Search Form: Colts Hall / 21 The Green / T1 T2 lime trees / conservation area / 20 Nov 2025
Notes: Correct live-row form for WCT-DIG-0467. Planning index records reduction of two lime trees back to previous pollarding points; exact application reference/applicant not surfaced in current indexed view.
Pass Added: 98
Colts Hall / 20 Nov 2025 / full Borough planning file / application reference
Variant / Search Form: Colts Hall / 20 Nov 2025 / full Borough planning file / application reference
Notes: Retrieve by exact address/date before using applicant, owner, plan or tree-ownership material. Current search does not verify the exact Colts Hall reference.
Pass Added: 98
"21 Colts Hall" "Eastgate Street" Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: "21 Colts Hall" "Eastgate Street" Shouldham
Notes: Official listed-building/address alias control; Council IDox 1480.
Pass Added: 96
"Colts Hall" "21 The Green" "Eastgate Street" HMLR
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "21 The Green" "Eastgate Street" HMLR
Notes: Dual-address modern title/index-map search so address variation does not hide a title result.
Pass Added: 96
"James Henry Townsend Green" "Weatherall and Green"
Variant / Search Form: "James Henry Townsend Green" "Weatherall and Green"
Notes: Exact full-name / firm search for predecessor-deed party and professional capacity.
Pass Added: 97
"James Henry Townsend Green" "Public Trustee"
Variant / Search Form: "James Henry Townsend Green" "Public Trustee"
Notes: Target exact 1929 co-grantor relationship; no direct 1929 instrument surfaced in Pass 97.
Pass Added: 97
"James Henry Townsend Green" "Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys"
Variant / Search Form: "James Henry Townsend Green" "Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys"
Notes: Target exact 16 Dec 1929 grantee relationship; no independent deed copy surfaced in Pass 97.
Pass Added: 97
"Green James Henry Townsend" "auctioneer" surveyor
Variant / Search Form: "Green James Henry Townsend" "auctioneer" surveyor
Notes: Contemporary directory identity/profession search; 1910 Post Office directory recovered.
Pass Added: 97
"Weatherall & Green" Norfolk property auction
Variant / Search Form: "Weatherall & Green" Norfolk property auction
Notes: Test whether Green's firm had wider Norfolk property-sale activity; contextual only unless tied to Watlington.
Pass Added: 97
Kelly Norfolk 1922 / 1925 / 1929 / Tottenhill / trustees of George Coote
Variant / Search Form: Kelly Norfolk 1922 / 1925 / 1929 / Tottenhill / trustees of George Coote
Notes: Digital-access routes for these directory years were identified, but the actual Tottenhill page text was not recovered in Pass 98. Do not promote to title evidence until the page is read.
Pass Added: 98
16 Dec 1929 Green + Public Trustee -> Humphreys / prior image batches
Variant / Search Form: 16 Dec 1929 Green + Public Trustee -> Humphreys / prior image batches
Notes: Current conversation/library search surfaces the 1930 deed recital but not a separately indexed 1929 instrument. This does NOT prove the user never uploaded the 1929 deed; re-check prior image/ZIP batches if accessible before external re-research.
Pass Added: 98
"James Henry Townsend Green" "Edward Humphreys" "31 July 1897" Morning Post
Variant / Search Form: "James Henry Townsend Green" "Edward Humphreys" "31 July 1897" Morning Post
Notes: New Pass 99 probate-network lead: BNA indexed Wills and Bequests snippet names exact J.H.T. Green and an Edward Humphreys as separate legatees in the same will. Testatrix and Edward identity remain unresolved; no Watlington connection is asserted.
Pass Added: 99
"Edward Humphreys" "Grover, Humphreys & Son" "4 King's Bench Walk"
Variant / Search Form: "Edward Humphreys" "Grover, Humphreys & Son" "4 King's Bench Walk"
Notes: Identity-control candidate only. A 1914 Law Directory independently records solicitor Edward Humphreys at Grover, Humphreys & Son, 4 King's Bench Walk, Temple; a UCL/British History source places an Edward Humphreys of that firm in property development in 1893-94. Same-person link to the 1913 Spooner probate or 1897 BNA legatee is NOT proved.
Pass Added: 99
"Colts Hall" "21 The Green" Shouldham "20 November 2025" application reference
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "21 The Green" Shouldham "20 November 2025" application reference
Notes: Targeted Pass 99 search again exposes the exact Colts Hall lime-tree conservation-area entry but not its application reference. 2/TPO/00673 remains King George Playing Field and must not be reused for Colts Hall.
Pass Added: 99
Shouldham 1843 tithe Homestall Further Homestall Charles Lemmon owner occupier plot IR 29 IR 30
Variant / Search Form: Shouldham 1843 tithe Homestall Further Homestall Charles Lemmon owner occupier plot IR 29 IR 30
Notes: Historic England again confirms Homestall/Further Homestall names, but Pass 99 targeted TNA/web search did not surface the exact Shouldham tithe plot numbers, owner, occupier, acreage/use or exact IR 29/IR 30 reference. Do not guess the reference from neighbouring parishes.
Pass Added: 99
HARE 5185 HARE 5186 Shouldham estate maps
Variant / Search Form: HARE 5185 HARE 5186 Shouldham estate maps
Notes: Hard dedupe: surfaced again in Pass 99 but already handled in Pass 87, including correction of misleading Downham-only downloadable extracts. Not new; do not reopen as a public-web discovery.
Pass Added: 99
ACC 2022/153 Janet Hammond ?Shouldham extent
Variant / Search Form: ACC 2022/153 Janet Hammond ?Shouldham extent
Notes: Hard dedupe: surfaced again in Pass 99 but already logged in the earlier extent/court-roll workstream (including RL-017). Not new; item remains an archive-access/source-identification target only.
Pass Added: 99
"2/TPO/00575" Shouldham "Land north of Lynn Road" "Westgate Street"
Variant / Search Form: "2/TPO/00575" Shouldham "Land north of Lynn Road" "Westgate Street"
Notes: NEW official council locality-control record. Two Lime trees on open land; TPO confirmed without modification. Added as WCT-DIG-0472 / ADA-213. No Colts title/parcel overlap is inferred.
Pass Added: 100
"23/00056/F" "J Cribb" Shouldham "Land east of 52 to 60 Westgate Street"
Variant / Search Form: "23/00056/F" "J Cribb" Shouldham "Land east of 52 to 60 Westgate Street"
Notes: Pass 100 refines existing WCT-DIG-0365: official council committee text identifies J Cribb as applicant for the later 2023 five-house scheme on 0.3ha land east of 52-60 Westgate Street. Applicant does not equal owner; exact overlap with the 2002 Pearce red-line site and any historic Colts parcel remains unproved.
Pass Added: 100
ncc_tithe MapServer "level 12" "61436" "85456" Colts Hall Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: ncc_tithe MapServer "level 12" "61436" "85456" Colts Hall Shouldham
Notes: Current Norfolk County Council ArcGIS service metadata independently confirms the live ncc_tithe cache uses EPSG:27700, 512x512 tiles, level 12 resolution 0.13229193125052918 and scale 1:500 with the published origin. This validates the existing WCT-DIG-0450 machine-address calculation, but the tile image/1843 plot number still has not been read.
Pass Added: 100
"16 December 1929" "James Henry Townsend Green" "Public Trustee" Humphreys file image PDF
Variant / Search Form: "16 December 1929" "James Henry Townsend Green" "Public Trustee" Humphreys file image PDF
Notes: Fresh indexed conversation+Library searches, including PDF/image-only searches and exact party/date combinations, did not surface the separate 16 Dec 1929 original. This is a CURRENT-INDEX negative control only and does not establish that an earlier user image/ZIP batch never contained it.
Pass Added: 100
"Colts Hall" "21 The Green" Shouldham "20 November 2025" application reference
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "21 The Green" Shouldham "20 November 2025" application reference
Notes: Pass 100 targeted recheck still exposes the exact Colts Hall conservation-area lime-tree entry but not its Borough application reference. 2/TPO/00673 remains the separate King George Playing Field Grey Poplar case.
Pass Added: 100
"James Henry Townsend Green" "Edward Humphreys" 1897 will testatrix
Variant / Search Form: "James Henry Townsend Green" "Edward Humphreys" 1897 will testatrix
Notes: Pass 100 follow-up did not identify the unnamed 1897 testatrix from the indexed legatee cluster. No same-person link between that Edward Humphreys and the 1913 Spooner/Coote solicitor is asserted.
Pass Added: 100
"Colts Hall" "21 The Green" PE33 0BY EPC council tax
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "21 The Green" PE33 0BY EPC council tax
Notes: NEW context-only administrative property control. Current public indexes expose exact Colts Hall postal address; council-tax Band F; EPC G / potential E / score 15 / house. Added as WCT-DIG-0473 / ADA-214. Not title or ownership proof.
Pass Added: 101
site:gov.uk "Colts Hall" "21 The Green" EPC council tax
Variant / Search Form: site:gov.uk "Colts Hall" "21 The Green" EPC council tax
Notes: Pass 101 did not surface a direct GOV.UK property-specific EPC or VOA/council-tax record for Colts Hall. The new record therefore remains explicitly secondary/index-derived and is not promoted to primary official status.
Pass Added: 101
"Shouldham" "Homestall" "Further Homestall" 1843 tithe plot Charles Lemmon
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham" "Homestall" "Further Homestall" 1843 tithe plot Charles Lemmon
Notes: Historic England again supplies the exact 1843 field names Homestall and Further Homestall, but no public search result exposed the plot number, owner, occupier, acreage/use or exact IR 29/IR 30 reference. No owner/occupier inference made.
Pass Added: 101
"Shouldham" "IR 29/23/" OR "IR 30/23/" tithe
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham" "IR 29/23/" OR "IR 30/23/" tithe
Notes: No exact Shouldham TNA IR 29/IR 30 reference surfaced in Pass 101. Do not infer the number from neighbouring Norfolk parishes.
Pass Added: 101
"James Green" "James Henry Townsend Green" "Edward Humphreys" "Charles James Ball" will 1897
Variant / Search Form: "James Green" "James Henry Townsend Green" "Edward Humphreys" "Charles James Ball" will 1897
Notes: Exact legatee-cluster search still surfaces the 31 Jul 1897 Morning Post indexed Wills and Bequests snippet but not the testatrix name. Edward Humphreys identity remains unresolved; no merge.
Pass Added: 101
Watlington-Colts_Batch_5_Enhanced_Ordered title-only Library search / 16 Dec 1929 Green Public Trustee Humphreys
Variant / Search Form: Watlington-Colts_Batch_5_Enhanced_Ordered title-only Library search / 16 Dec 1929 Green Public Trustee Humphreys
Notes: Pass 101 title-only Library search did not surface the underlying Batch-5 image/ZIP/conveyance artifact; results were unrelated or cumulative handovers. This does NOT prove the original was never supplied in an earlier unsurfaced batch.
Pass Added: 101
"Colts Hall" "21 The Green" "20 November 2025" application reference
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "21 The Green" "20 November 2025" application reference
Notes: Pass 101 still surfaces the parish index entry for T1/T2 lime pollarding but no exact Borough application reference. 2/TPO/00673 remains the separate King George Playing Field Grey Poplar case.
Pass Added: 101
"Lemmon Charles, Shouldham" 1835 poll Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: "Lemmon Charles, Shouldham" 1835 poll Norfolk
Notes: NEW. Indexed 1835 West Norfolk poll-book entry exposes exact 'Lemmon Charles, Shouldham'. Added WCT-DIG-0474 / ADA-215. Qualification property/page remains unread; no ownership inference.
Pass Added: 102
"Charles Lemmon" Shouldham 1835 elector qualification property
Variant / Search Form: "Charles Lemmon" Shouldham 1835 elector qualification property
Notes: Parent poll book and exact indexed name/place are surfaced, but Pass 102 did not recover the actual qualification/property line. Do not classify the vote as Colts Hall/freehold without that page.
Pass Added: 102
"Shouldham" "Homestall" "Further Homestall" 1843 tithe plot owner occupier
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham" "Homestall" "Further Homestall" 1843 tithe plot owner occupier
Notes: Pass 102 again confirms only the Historic England field-name bridge. Exact tithe plot number, owner, occupier, acreage/use and IR 29/IR 30 reference remain unsurfaced.
Pass Added: 102
"Colts Hall" "21 The Green" "20 November 2025" T1 T2 lime application
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "21 The Green" "20 November 2025" T1 T2 lime application
Notes: Pass 102 still reaches the parish index wording but not the exact Borough application reference/file. 2/TPO/00673 remains the separate King George Playing Field Grey Poplar case.
Pass Added: 102
"16 December 1929" Watlington Gawsells Trusbutts Tottenhill "Public Trustee"
Variant / Search Form: "16 December 1929" Watlington Gawsells Trusbutts Tottenhill "Public Trustee"
Notes: No public copy of the predecessor conveyance surfaced in Pass 102. Existing 1930 recital remains the operative evidence; no schedule/capacity/root-title detail is inferred.
Pass Added: 102
"James Green" "James Henry Townsend Green" "Edward Humphreys" "Charles James Ball" 1897 will
Variant / Search Form: "James Green" "James Henry Townsend Green" "Edward Humphreys" "Charles James Ball" 1897 will
Notes: Exact legatee-cluster searching still did not identify the 1897 testatrix. No Edward Humphreys identity merge and no Watlington link are asserted.
Pass Added: 102
"TREECA" Shouldham "Bodgers Barn" 24/00135
Variant / Search Form: "TREECA" Shouldham "Bodgers Barn" 24/00135
Notes: NEW exact Borough class control. Official 2024 Shouldham record = 24/00135/TREECA, Tree Application - No objection. Added WCT-DIG-0475 / ADA-216. This establishes the local TREECA reference class, not the 2025 Colts Hall number.
Pass Added: 103
"Works to Trees in a Conservation Area" "delegated powers" West Norfolk
Variant / Search Form: "Works to Trees in a Conservation Area" "delegated powers" West Norfolk
Notes: Official 2026 Planning Committee report expressly excludes TPO and Works to Trees in a Conservation Area from its ordinary delegated application list. Stop using that report series to hunt the Colts Hall file; use direct tree/planning register route.
Pass Added: 103
"Colts Hall" Shouldham TREECA 2025
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" Shouldham TREECA 2025
Notes: Pass 103 now has the correct Borough application CLASS but exact 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall TREECA reference still did not surface. Do not infer the number from neighbouring cases.
Pass Added: 103
"Lemmon Charles, Shouldham" 1835 qualification property
Variant / Search Form: "Lemmon Charles, Shouldham" 1835 qualification property
Notes: Pass 103 did not recover the actual poll-book qualification line/page. WCT-DIG-0474 remains a residence/electoral control only; no freehold/Colts Hall inference.
Pass Added: 103
"Shouldham" Homestall Further Homestall 1843 tithe owner occupier
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham" Homestall Further Homestall 1843 tithe owner occupier
Notes: No change: exact 1843 plot number, owner, occupier, acreage/use and IR 29/IR 30 reference remain unrecovered. Do not duplicate Historic England's already logged field-name evidence.
Pass Added: 103
"16 December 1929" Green Public Trustee Humphreys Watlington Colts
Variant / Search Form: "16 December 1929" Green Public Trustee Humphreys Watlington Colts
Notes: No new public route surfaced. Existing 1930 primary recital remains the evidence; separate predecessor instrument remains an archive/private-file retrieval target.
Pass Added: 103
"Charles Lemmon" "Mary Winearls" "Hannah Dean" Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: "Charles Lemmon" "Mary Winearls" "Hannah Dean" Shouldham
Notes: Pass 104 data-integrity correction. Discover Downham explicitly says Mary Winearls was Charles Lemmon's first wife (m. Shouldham 1821) and Hannah Dean his second wife, with Charles + Hannah at Shouldham by 1840. Early baptism entries with Mary fit the first stage; later Mary entries create an unresolved chronology conflict.
Pass Added: 104
"Charles Lemmon" farmer Mary Shouldham 1822 1824 1826 1828 1836
Variant / Search Form: "Charles Lemmon" farmer Mary Shouldham 1822 1824 1826 1828 1836
Notes: Primary-derived baptism transcription repeatedly names farmer Charles Lemmon + Mary before the 1843 tithe. This supports an early Charles/Mary farming presence but not ownership.
Pass Added: 104
"Charles Lemmon" farmer Mary Shouldham 1850 1852 1853 1855 1859
Variant / Search Form: "Charles Lemmon" farmer Mary Shouldham 1850 1852 1853 1855 1859
Notes: Later baptism entries still name farmer Charles + Mary, conflicting with the secondary reconstruction's Hannah-by-1840 chronology. Identity/couple continuity is placed on hold pending primary marriage/death/census/original-register resolution.
Pass Added: 104
"25/00257/TREECA" Shouldham Orchard House 3 Lynn Road
Variant / Search Form: "25/00257/TREECA" Shouldham Orchard House 3 Lynn Road
Notes: Pass 104 exact sequence control: third-party planning index identifies the 6 Nov 2025 Shouldham Orchard House walnut case as 25/00257/TREECA; parish index independently confirms the same event wording/date/address.
Pass Added: 104
"25/00278/TREECA" OR "25/00284/TREECA" OR "25/00289/TREECA" November 2025 Kings Lynn
Variant / Search Form: "25/00278/TREECA" OR "25/00284/TREECA" OR "25/00289/TREECA" November 2025 Kings Lynn
Notes: Late-November Borough-area TREECA sequence controls recovered. Useful for search targeting only; they do not justify deriving the omitted Colts Hall reference.
Pass Added: 104
"Colts Hall" "previous pollarding points" "20 November 2025"
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "previous pollarding points" "20 November 2025"
Notes: Exact phrase search continues to return the Shouldham parish entry but no visible application reference. The underlying direct 'View application' destination remains the preferred target; do not guess the number.
Pass Added: 104
"Shouldham" Homestall 1843 Charles Lemmon Mary Hannah
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham" Homestall 1843 Charles Lemmon Mary Hannah
Notes: No exact tithe owner/occupier/plot surfaced. Pass 104 specifically prevents wife/identity assumptions from being used to fill that gap.
Pass Added: 104
"IR 29/23/274" Hemblington tithe apportionment
Variant / Search Form: "IR 29/23/274" Hemblington tithe apportionment
Notes: NEW official TNA control: Hemblington apportionment = IR 29/23/274, paired map = IR 30/23/274. Establishes Norfolk subseries architecture, not Shouldham's final item.
Pass Added: 105
"IR 30/23/389" Neatishead tithe map
Variant / Search Form: "IR 30/23/389" Neatishead tithe map
Notes: NEW independent official TNA control: Neatishead map = IR 30/23/389 and paired apportionment = IR 29/23/389. Confirms same final item number is shared across Norfolk map/apportionment pair.
Pass Added: 105
"Tithe apportionment of Shouldham" "IR 29/23"
Variant / Search Form: "Tithe apportionment of Shouldham" "IR 29/23"
Notes: Pass 105 exact-title/reference searching still did not surface Shouldham's final TNA item number. County subseries is now fixed; final item remains open and must not be guessed.
Pass Added: 105
"Tithe map of Shouldham" "IR 30/23"
Variant / Search Form: "Tithe map of Shouldham" "IR 30/23"
Notes: Pass 105 exact map-title searching did not expose the final Shouldham item number. Once recovered, the paired apportionment must use the same final item in IR 29/23.
Pass Added: 105
"Lemmon Charles, Shouldham" 1835 poll qualification
Variant / Search Form: "Lemmon Charles, Shouldham" 1835 poll qualification
Notes: No actual poll-book qualification/property line surfaced in Pass 105. Elector status remains residence/qualification context only.
Pass Added: 105
"Colts Hall" "20 November 2025" TREECA "View application"
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "20 November 2025" TREECA "View application"
Notes: Underlying direct planning-register destination still did not surface through current indexed/cache routes. Exact TREECA number remains open; no sequential inference.
Pass Added: 105
"Charles Lemmon" "Mary Winearls" "Hannah Dean" census 1841 1851
Variant / Search Form: "Charles Lemmon" "Mary Winearls" "Hannah Dean" census 1841 1851
Notes: No primary census/marriage source was recovered in Pass 105 that resolves the post-1840 Mary/Hannah conflict. Pass 104 identity quarantine remains in force.
Pass Added: 105
TheGenealogist tithe County Parish alone no surname
Variant / Search Form: TheGenealogist tithe County Parish alone no surname
Notes: NEW operational route. Current provider guidance explicitly permits County/Parish-only tithe search with no forename/surname, then transcript/original/map access. Added WCT-DIG-0477 / ADA-218.
Pass Added: 106
TheGenealogist tithe piece sub-piece same as TNA Discovery reference
Variant / Search Form: TheGenealogist tithe piece sub-piece same as TNA Discovery reference
Notes: Current provider guidance says the map page exposes piece and sub-piece selectors matching the TNA Discovery reference. This can recover Shouldham's final IR item from the result rather than before it.
Pass Added: 106
Forebears Shouldham Tithe Apportionments 1836-1856
Variant / Search Form: Forebears Shouldham Tithe Apportionments 1836-1856
Notes: Parish-specific external index confirms Tithe Apportionments are surfaced under Shouldham land/property records; useful collection-presence control only, not parcel evidence.
Pass Added: 106
"Shouldham" "IR 29/23/"
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham" "IR 29/23/"
Notes: Exact final Shouldham TNA item still did not surface through ordinary indexed web search. Pass 106 changes workflow: direct parish search first, item number from returned record.
Pass Added: 106
"Shouldham" "IR 30/23/"
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham" "IR 30/23/"
Notes: Exact final Shouldham map item still unsurfaced via ordinary indexing. No interpolation used.
Pass Added: 106
"Colts Hall" "Homestall" tithe owner occupier
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "Homestall" tithe owner occupier
Notes: No indexed public snippet exposed the 1843 owner/occupier. Actual parish result/apportionment remains required.
Pass Added: 106
"Further Homestall" Shouldham tithe owner
Variant / Search Form: "Further Homestall" Shouldham tithe owner
Notes: No new owner/occupier result surfaced outside the actual tithe collection. Historic England field-name evidence remains already logged.
Pass Added: 106
"Shouldham and Garboiesthorpe" 1794 5570
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham and Garboiesthorpe" 1794 5570
Notes: NEW. Direct searchable enclosure table gives place/year/acres = Shouldham and Garboiesthorpe / 1794 / 5570. Added WCT-DIG-0478 / ADA-219. Context only; not Colts/Hare acreage.
Pass Added: 107
"Topography of Great Britain" Cooke Norfolk Suffolk Internet Archive
Variant / Search Form: "Topography of Great Britain" Cooke Norfolk Suffolk Internet Archive
Notes: Full digitized Cooke Norfolk/Suffolk volume independently located at Internet Archive. Exact Pass 107 table wording was verified from the searchable transcription rather than inferred from the scan.
Pass Added: 107
"Hare 3083/2" 26 Nov 1611 Riche Battes
Variant / Search Form: "Hare 3083/2" 26 Nov 1611 Riche Battes
Notes: Official catalogue re-confirms Sir Robert Riche + Dame Frances -> William Battes, Shouldham Thorpe/Garboysthorpe, Foston and Russells. NOT added as a Digital Record because earlier passes explicitly excluded this catalogue-only deed pending substantive scan/transcription.
Pass Added: 107
ncc_tithe MapServer export Colt's Hall bbox 567650 308700 568050 309100
Variant / Search Form: ncc_tithe MapServer export Colt's Hall bbox 567650 308700 568050 309100
Notes: Norfolk ArcGIS Export Map operation is live and supports large image export, but Pass 107 did not successfully retrieve/read the returned tithe image through the current tool path. No plot number is claimed.
Pass Added: 107
"Shouldham" "IR 29/23/" tithe
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham" "IR 29/23/" tithe
Notes: Exact final Shouldham TNA item remains unsurfaced in ordinary indexing. Pass 106 parish-only direct collection route remains preferred.
Pass Added: 107
"Colts Hall" "20 November 2025" TREECA
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "20 November 2025" TREECA
Notes: No exact Colts Hall TREECA reference surfaced in Pass 107. Existing class/sequence controls remain; no number guessed.
Pass Added: 107
"Shouldham" 1798 land tax owner occupier Hare Lemmon
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham" 1798 land tax owner occupier Hare Lemmon
Notes: No actual Shouldham 1798 proprietor/occupier rows surfaced in Pass 107. IR 23 / C/Scd 2 route remains open.
Pass Added: 107
Ancestry UK Land Tax Redemption 1798 TNA IR23 Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: Ancestry UK Land Tax Redemption 1798 TNA IR23 Shouldham
Notes: NEW direct-access route. Ancestry states the collection is imaged from TNA IR 23 and lists owners/occupants; added WCT-DIG-0479 / ADA-220.
Pass Added: 108
Forebears Shouldham Land Tax Redemption 1798-1811
Variant / Search Form: Forebears Shouldham Land Tax Redemption 1798-1811
Notes: NEW Shouldham-specific collection presence control. Forebears lists Land Tax Redemption under Shouldham taxation and land/property records and describes owner/occupier/assessment fields.
Pass Added: 108
"Shouldham" "Land Tax Redemption" Hare
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham" "Land Tax Redemption" Hare
Notes: No actual Shouldham proprietor/occupier row surfaced through ordinary web indexing in Pass 108; direct database search remains required.
Pass Added: 108
"Shouldham" "Land Tax Redemption" Lemmon
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham" "Land Tax Redemption" Lemmon
Notes: No Lemmon result was promoted. Charles Lemmon's documented Shouldham farming starts later; do not back-project him into 1798.
Pass Added: 108
"Trussbut Lodge" "22 The Green" Shouldham
Variant / Search Form: "Trussbut Lodge" "22 The Green" Shouldham
Notes: New modern place-name clue surfaced adjacent to Colts Hall in property-address data, but no historical/planning evidence yet establishes when or why the house acquired the Trussbut name. Held as context-only search lead; not counted.
Pass Added: 108
"Colts Hall" "20 November 2025" planning.org.uk TREECA
Variant / Search Form: "Colts Hall" "20 November 2025" planning.org.uk TREECA
Notes: Exact Colts Hall TREECA number still did not surface. No neighbouring-number deduction made.
Pass Added: 108
"Homestall" Shouldham tithe owner occupier
Variant / Search Form: "Homestall" Shouldham tithe owner occupier
Notes: No new actual tithe owner/occupier row surfaced. Historic England field-name evidence remains the control; direct tithe database/image still required.
Pass Added: 108
"Shouldham and Shouldham-Thorpe Inclosure" Reel 1619 17267.1
Variant / Search Form: "Shouldham and Shouldham-Thorpe Inclosure" Reel 1619 17267.1
Notes: Hard dedupe: exact Goldsmiths'-Kress reel/item was already captured in earlier passes; not recounted.
Pass Added: 108
"Notes and Queries" "Butts family" 24 Jan 1857 G.H.D.
Variant / Search Form: "Notes and Queries" "Butts family" 24 Jan 1857 G.H.D.
Notes: CORRECTION, not new evidence. Main cumulative had 1867/3rd Series; actual source is 2nd Series vol. III, no.56, 24 Jan 1857, signed G.H.D.
Pass Added: 109
"D. (G. H.) on the Butts family, 74"
Variant / Search Form: "D. (G. H.) on the Butts family, 74"
Notes: Internal volume-index control for the same 1857 article. Already solved in Court Rolls Pass 10/11; integrated into main ledger only.
Pass Added: 109
George Henry Dashwood G.H.D. Butts family Stow Bardolph
Variant / Search Form: George Henry Dashwood G.H.D. Butts family Stow Bardolph
Notes: HARD DEDUPE. Dashwood identification/provenance was already present in the Court Rolls workbook (RL-014/RL-024/RL-026). Do not count again.
Pass Added: 109
George Henry Dashwood Stow Hall muniment room Sir Thomas Hare
Variant / Search Form: George Henry Dashwood Stow Hall muniment room Sir Thomas Hare
Notes: HARD DEDUPE. Prior Court Rolls research had already redirected the 'private collector' lead to Stow/Hare muniment provenance. Integrated into main cumulative as a correction only.
Pass Added: 109
Hare family archive 7570 items Norfolk Record Office Acceptance in Lieu
Variant / Search Form: Hare family archive 7570 items Norfolk Record Office Acceptance in Lieu
Notes: HARD DEDUPE. Already present in main Digital Records row WCT-DIG-0341 / current archive-custody work. Not a Pass 109 discovery.
Pass Added: 109
Goldsmiths-Kress 17267.1 Reel 1619 Shouldham enclosure
Variant / Search Form: Goldsmiths-Kress 17267.1 Reel 1619 Shouldham enclosure
Notes: HARD DEDUPE. Already established in earlier passes; no further count unless actual 11-page content is opened/read.
Pass Added: 109
1985 Pearce 10 acres near the hall / 1911 Shouldham 30 acre 16 acre small holdings
Variant / Search Form: 1985 Pearce 10 acres near the hall / 1911 Shouldham 30 acre 16 acre small holdings
Notes: HARD DEDUPE. Both were fully worked in earlier handovers; do not revisit as new parcel evidence without a new plan/title/owner identity.
Pass Added: 109
FamilySearch catalog 438436 FHL 1472612 item 10 1702188 item 14
Variant / Search Form: FamilySearch catalog 438436 FHL 1472612 item 10 1702188 item 14
Notes: HARD DEDUPE. Exact catalog ID and both film/item references were already established in Pass 66/67 and are present in WCT-DIG-0392 / ADA-142. Do not count again.
Pass Added: 110
"Manor of Watlington-with-West Dereham" modern Norfolk Record Office shelfmark
Variant / Search Form: "Manor of Watlington-with-West Dereham" modern Norfolk Record Office shelfmark
Notes: Pass 110 public-index search still did not expose the modern NRO shelfmark. This remains a real open identifier, not a reason to add another access-route record.
Pass Added: 110
"Add MS 46411" "Deed Room Stow Bardolph"
Variant / Search Form: "Add MS 46411" "Deed Room Stow Bardolph"
Notes: HARD DEDUPE from specialist Court Rolls work. Confirms a Hare/Stow muniment left the family archive and is now at British Library; integrated into main WCT-DIG-0341 only.
Pass Added: 110
"Add Ch 74436" Sir Thomas Hare Mrs Charles Howard
Variant / Search Form: "Add Ch 74436" Sir Thomas Hare Mrs Charles Howard
Notes: NEW custody-control detail but not counted as a separate Watlington Digital Record: British Library catalogue says the Ramsey Abbey charter belonged to Sir Thomas Hare, 2nd Bt., and was presented by Mrs Charles Howard in 1947.
Pass Added: 110
Dashwood 1857 Gawsells West Dereham Watlington modern HARE shelfmark
Variant / Search Form: Dashwood 1857 Gawsells West Dereham Watlington modern HARE shelfmark
Notes: No exact item-level HARE match surfaced in Pass 110. Continue item matching only; generic Dashwood/Stow/Hare provenance is already solved.
Pass Added: 110
"Manorial court rolls, 1540-1566, 1786-1909" film
Variant / Search Form: "Manorial court rolls, 1540-1566, 1786-1909" film
Notes: No new source beyond existing FamilySearch/WeRelate metadata. Opening roll remains unread; no new record counted.
Pass Added: 110
"Gawsells M. in Watlington" 34 Henry VIII HARE
Variant / Search Form: "Gawsells M. in Watlington" 34 Henry VIII HARE
Notes: No modern shelfmark surfaced publicly. Exact 1542-43 court-roll item remains unresolved and must be matched against surviving HARE/other dispersed muniments.
Pass Added: 110
"Extracts from manor court rolls and parish registers, 1540-1793" "West Dereham"
Variant / Search Form: "Extracts from manor court rolls and parish registers, 1540-1793" "West Dereham"
Notes: NEW NON-DUPLICATE LEAD. FamilySearch-derived West Dereham listing exposes this exact source title/date range. Added as WCT-DIG-0480. Underlying extract/film/catalog ID still unread.
Pass Added: 111
"Extracts from manor court rolls and parish registers, 1540-1793" FamilySearch
Variant / Search Form: "Extracts from manor court rolls and parish registers, 1540-1793" FamilySearch
Notes: Exact FamilySearch catalogue ID and FHL film number did not surface in current public indexing. Do not invent them.
Pass Added: 111
"890188" "West Dereham"
Variant / Search Form: "890188" "West Dereham"
Notes: NO VERIFIED CROSSWALK. WeRelate's separate 'Extracts from manor court rolls and parish registers, 1297-1782' is FHL 890188 item 6, but no evidence currently identifies that source with the West Dereham 1540-1793 listing.
Pass Added: 111
"West Dereham manor court: minutes 1792-1856" "ACC 2002/145"
Variant / Search Form: "West Dereham manor court: minutes 1792-1856" "ACC 2002/145"
Notes: HARD DEDUPE. TNA 2002 accession evidence was already captured in the Pass 65 workbook log; not counted again in Pass 111.
Pass Added: 111
"West Dereham" "BL/MA" manor 1792 1856
Variant / Search Form: "West Dereham" "BL/MA" manor 1792 1856
Notes: No post-accession BL/MA item-level shelfmark for the ACC 2002/145 West Dereham minutes surfaced publicly in Pass 111.
Pass Added: 111
"Manor of Watlington-with-West Dereham" modern Norfolk Record Office shelfmark
Variant / Search Form: "Manor of Watlington-with-West Dereham" modern Norfolk Record Office shelfmark
Notes: Still unresolved. FamilySearch catalog 438436 and both FHL film/item references remain solved; modern NRO item match and opening 1540 roll remain unread.
Pass Added: 111
Pass 1 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 1
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 28
New rows this pass: 28
Research focus: Seed prior findings + expanded broader digital-survivals search
Notes: Cumulative workbook initiated. Archive-order-only catalogue references excluded. New finds include Rouen heraldic roll PDF, Battle Abbey Roll PDF, Buckenham/Bokenham family-history PDF, modern Watlington Colts article PDF, direct Michigan Close Rolls and additional verified E-CIPM records.
Pass 2 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 2
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 36
New rows this pass: 8
Research focus: Medieval Trussebut economic/legal records + Colt succession + early Tudor Shouldham context
Notes: Added 8 records. Strongest new direct-access items: 1413–14 Runcton Holm indenture description; 1561 Colt visitation naming Jane as Thursbotte heiress and later Leonard Smythe of Shuldham; 1391 Lynn rental; 1389 Close Roll oath; 1471 Colt/Trusbut memorial record; 1543 Smyth will. Identity links are explicitly cautioned where not independently proved.
Pass 3 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 3
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 44
New rows this pass: 8
Research focus: Shouldham–Gawdy kinship, Hare estate evidence, enclosure landscape, later Colts Hall occupancy
Notes: Added 8 records. Key additions: 1621 REED probate transcript linking the Shouldham and Gawdy kin networks; 1634 Shouldham Warren lease reference; Parkin's 1735 letter describing direct examination of Sir Thomas Hare's evidences and the Shouldham seal; 1795–96 enclosure notices with roads to Watlington and Runston Holme across Hare land; 1883 White directory; 1896 Kelly lordship statement; direct 1912 Kelly scan pairing Sir Thomas Leigh Hare with Walter Lemmon at Colts Hall; Companies House legal address record. Catalogue-only NRO/TNA hits were deliberately excluded.
Pass 4 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 4
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 54
New rows this pass: 10
Research focus: Tudor Gawsell/Gawdy legal estate layer, manorial gamekeeping litigation, enclosure legislation, historic mapping
Notes: Added 10 records. Major additions include 1566 Shouldham Thorpe court activity; 1586 Gawsell of Watlington feoffment; 1587 Royal Letters Patent for the manor of Shuldham with foldage/tolls/stallage and the Tottenhill–Setchey–Wallington–Thorpland–Runcton Holme cluster; 1590 Gawsell-to-Gawdy feoffment; a related 1611 'Trusbutes' indenture; Morris v. Forby (1780); the 1794 Commons enclosure proceedings; Blyth's 1863 full scan; and two NLS 25-inch OS map viewers. Transcription-only items and map-viewer access limitations are explicitly labelled.
Pass 5 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 5
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 64
New rows this pass: 10
Research focus: Direct Gawsell probate records; Butts court succession; Shuldham title article; 17th-c. holder network
Notes: Added 10 records. Major gains are full online transcriptions plus FamilySearch images for Thomas Gawsell (1500), Ellen Gawsell (1507) and Richard Gawsell (1538); Notes and Queries court-roll notes explicitly naming 'Gawsells M. in Watlington' and William Butts holding court jure uxoris; 1520s subsidy evidence; the Gawsell→Butts marriage bridge; dedicated Norfolk Archaeology articles on the Gawsell pedigree and Thomas Shuldham's title to a manor of Watlington; a 1651 primary printed Act naming Sir Ralph Hare and Gregory Gawsel in the same Norfolk commission; and Gawsell swan-mark evidence. Catalogue-only hits remain excluded.
Pass 6 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 6
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 73
New rows this pass: 9
Research focus: Domesday originals, 1440–41 Shouldham plans, Gawsell/Buttes material evidence, Hare-era landscape and place-name controls
Notes: Added 9 new records and materially enriched WCT-DIG-0064. Major gains: Open Domesday Shouldham Thorpe with actual folio image and Baynard tenure; folio 166 territorial context; PASE estate network; scholarly identification of two Shouldham plans dated 1440–41; E-CIPM Shouldham Priory advowson timeline; official Shouldham Thorpe conservation evidence; 1870–72 Hare lordship; 1845 Garbois-Thorpe continuity; and a scanned 1664 Clackclose warrant/list. A critical correction is now built into the variants sheet: Wallington cum Thorpland is distinct from Watlington and must not be normalised into it without record-specific proof.
Pass 7 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 7
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 84
New rows this pass: 11
Research focus: Watlington enclosure; Plestow Hall chronology; Gawsels courts; Hall/park map evidence
Notes: Added 11 records. Strongest gains: the 1748/49 Watlington Inclosure Act title and digitised 1749 enclosure notice (without mislabelling it as a full Act scan); Thomas Plestow at Watlington Hall by 1781; John Davis Plestow as rector/patron 1791–1824; Sir Thomas Berners Plestow's 1818 knighthood and 1819 death; Charles Berners Plestow at the Hall before 1830; White 1845 explicitly naming him lord of Gawsels with yearly courts leet and baron; official Hall/park map evidence; and White 1883 naming George Coote as lord of Gawsels while the Hall was separately owned. Wallington cum Thorpland remains strictly distinct from Watlington.
Pass 8 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 8
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 96
New rows this pass: 12
Research focus: Full Dashwood extraction; medieval title/deed layer; Gawsell place controls; Birch/Coote/Tottenhill chronology; Watlington OS mapping
Notes: Added 12 new records and materially upgraded WCT-DIG-0061/0062, while correcting WCT-DIG-0014. Major gains: the actual digitised Dashwood texts now yield a Henry VI field-book title entry for Thomas Shuldham and coparceners to a Manor of Watlington, a 33 Henry VI Gawsell–Iwayn marriage settlement, and William Iwayn's 1459 will. These records strongly reinforce that a Gawsell 'of Watlington' can coexist with separate Wallington/Thorpland property. Added the 1505 AALT Common Pleas executor entries for Thomas Gawecell of Watlyngton, an 1812 Plestow-at-Watlington notice that separately names Wallington, separate Tottenhill lordship markers (Mrs Plestow → George Coote → Coote trustees), a 1899 official Birch-at-Watlington-Hall occurrence, and three Watlington OS LVII.1 editions. Commercial/derivative claims about 1869/1929 Colts transfers remain uncorroborated and were not promoted as evidence.
Pass 9 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 9
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 105
New rows this pass: 9
Research focus: Gawsell deed enrolments and county office; Sir Robert Gawsell; Shouldham charity; 1664/1563 heraldic pedigree layer
Notes: Added 9 records. Strongest gains are three separate 1649–51 enrolled bargain-and-sale entries naming Gregory Gawsell of Watlington; a corroborated 1649 Sheriff of Norfolk marker; direct public-domain baronetage text naming Sir Robert Gawsell of Watlington and daughter Susan; Edward Shouldham's 1646 two-acre Watlington charitable close; the 1664 'Schuldham of Watlington' pedigree extracted from the digitised visitation; a cautiously labelled secondary early Shuldham–Watlington descent framework; and a full-view 1563 Visitation source indexed for 35 GAWSELL occurrences. No 'of Watlington' reference is treated as proof of Watlington-Colts/Gawsels title without separate evidence.
Pass 10 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 10
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 109
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Feet of Fines place-name/manor controls; direct Rye subsidy; Hare estate-map digitisation
Notes: Added 4 non-duplicate records and materially upgraded WCT-DIG-0011, WCT-DIG-0016 and WCT-DIG-0059. Major gains: a 1380 Howard-associated Watlington land settlement; a 1498 final concord that explicitly lists Walyngton and Watlyngton together (strong Wallington ≠ Watlington control); a 1506 final concord for an unnamed manor of Watlyngton with free fold and St Peter advowson; and a direct 1851 Hare estate-map PDF extract. The 1427 IPM now explicitly records the parallel Trusbut Watlington fee, Robert Kervyle quarter-fee and separate Wallington/Thorpland fee groups. Rye's direct digitised subsidy transcription now replaces reliance on the later 'Hatlington' OCR.
Pass 11 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 11
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 113
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Tudor Gawsell fine; Spelman landed-family testimony; 1595 legal-trust lead; 1966 Watlington Hall official continuity
Notes: Added 4 non-duplicate records. Strongest new legal item is NRO HARE 3080/7 as directly transcribed in the Godbould PDF: a 20 Apr 1586 fine with Thomas Gawsell and Richard Godbould as plaintiffs over a messuage, gardens and lands including Garboysthorpe. Added the digitised House of Gournay quotation of Spelman's early antiquarian description 'Gawsell, at Watlington' as a long-established landed-family marker; a cautiously labelled secondary quotation of a 1595 Betts settlement naming Thomas Gawswell of Watlington as trustee; and the official 11 Mar 1966 London Gazette naming Major Stephen John Pope of Watlington Hall. No source is treated as proof of Watlington-Colts title unless it actually establishes that identity.
Pass 12 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 12
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 120
New rows this pass: 7
Research focus: Original E179 parish images; Gawsell monuments; Butts visitation/probate; eighteenth-century place control
Notes: Added 7 non-duplicate records. Major gains: official TNA E179 pages exposing original assessment images for Watlington and Shouldham Thorpe in the 1336/38 fifteenth-and-tenth and 1546 Free and Voluntary Contribution; Historic England's official description of the 1600 Thomas Cawsel/Gawsel monument with arms at Watlington; the directly scanned 1619 Kent Visitation pedigree of Leonard Butts; a scanned PCC calendar entry for William Butts of Thorpe alias Shouldham Thorpe alias Garboysthorpe (1626, 36 Hele); a direct photograph of Ursula Gawsell's 1645 memorial naming her father Thomas Gawsell of Watlington; and the 1768 Clackclose poll-book transcription separately listing Wallington & Thorpland and Watlington. The 1628 Leonard Buttes→Sir John Hare deed naming Gawsells was found only as an archive catalogue description and was deliberately excluded pending a substantive digital copy/transcription.
Pass 13 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 13
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 129
New rows this pass: 9
Research focus: Pre-1540 Butts deed/court-roll chronology; Russell manor court; Gregory Gawsell public network; additional swan-mark evidence
Notes: Added 9 non-duplicate records. The strongest gain is a sequence of published extracts from deeds and court rolls extending the But/Butts presence around Garbesthorp and Foston from 24 Henry VI through 7 Henry VIII: deed occurrence, deed witness, Foston amercement, a three-rood conveyance, fealty for a messuage and 12 acres, and a Garbesthorp deed party. Added the later 1612 first court for the separately named manor of Russell in Garbesthorp; a directly digitised 1630 state-grant compilation naming Gregory Gawsell in the Providence Island Company; and swan-mark no.105 for Edmond Gawsell, second son of Thomas of Watlington. The 1628 Leonard Buttes→Sir John Hare deed remains excluded because only an archive catalogue description is currently available, and the 1596 commercial/derivative Colts-Trusbuttes narrative has not been promoted.
Pass 14 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 14
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 138
New rows this pass: 9
Research focus: Trusbut royal/public records and Paston letter; Watlington customary works; Rich/Gawdy/Butts succession context
Notes: Added 9 non-duplicate records. Major gains: a 1400 Patent Roll entry naming Thomas Trussebut as owner of the Lynn ship la Trinite; Stow Bardolph account-roll comparisons (1426–29) valuing customary works from Watlington; separate 1434, 1442 and 1443 royal commissions involving Thomas Trusbut/Trussebutte, including explicit 'esquire' status and the Marham-to-Wiggenhall water-management district; a 4 Oct 1450 Paston letter naming Thomas Trusbut with Thomas Kervile and Shuldham servants; a 1609 deed quotation styling Sir Robert Riche of Wallington; independent 1612/13 Godbould-will material naming William Butts of Garbristhorpe with the separate manor of Russell; and swan-mark no.88 passing from Francis Gawdy of Wallington to the Earl of Warwick. Catalogue-only 1611 Rich→Battes and 1628 Buttes→Hare deeds remain deliberately excluded pending substantive digital copies/transcriptions.
Pass 15 — 2026-08-30
Pass: 15
Date: 2026-08-30
Rows after pass: 144
New rows this pass: 6
Research focus: Colt/Trusbut succession: Warwick fine, royal offices, Joan→John inheritance, John Colt will, Elizabethan Colt's Hall; brass chronology corrected
Notes: Added 6 non-duplicate records and materially upgraded WCT-DIG-0034. Major gains: CP 25/1/294/74 no.41 placing Thomas Colt and Henry Sotehill in Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick's 1450/1466 estate settlement; Edward IV's 10 Sep 1464 grant making Thomas Colt keeper of the Chancery rolls in Ireland; 1467 successor-office entries that independently support the revised 1467 death chronology; Copinger's digitised Cavendish manor history explicitly tracing Joan [Trusbut] Colt Parr to son/heir John Colt and citing Joan's IPM (15 Edw IV no.34); a substantive digital transcription of John Colt's 1521 will naming the manors of Netherhall and Greyes; and the Folger 2 Aug 1578 record of Elizabeth I dining at George Colt's Colt Hall. The existing Roydon-brass row is upgraded with modern Essex Archaeology scholarship showing the traditional 1471 date should be read as 1467. None of these records is used to validate the derivative 1581 lease/1596 Watlington-Colts sale claim.
Pass 16 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 16
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 150
New rows this pass: 6
Research focus: Laurence Trussebut royal/administrative record seam; Bardolf and Scales network; 1587/1596 Colt→Shouldham date conflict
Notes: Added 6 non-duplicate substantive digital records. Major gains: a 28 Oct 1389 Close Roll oath directly linking Lawrence Trusbut with William Bardolf's Norfolk commission; a 1396 Fine Roll showing Laurence as mainpernor for custody of a Hastings manor; a September 1397 commission of the under-stewardship of the Eight and a Half Hundreds; a 9 Sep 1402 Norfolk commission of array; a 16 Jul 1403 Fine Roll placing Laurence in direct custody of Scales estate interests and the minor heir; and a 6 Feb 1404 Patent Roll licence for a Dalham manor feoffment. WCT-DIG-0015 and WCT-DIG-0025 were also upgraded to flag a source conflict: Historic England gives 1587 for George Colt → Thomas Shouldham, while Manorial Services/Feudal Titles gives 1596. The underlying 1581 lease/1596 conveyance remains unverified from a substantive digital deed.
Pass 17 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 17
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 160
New rows this pass: 10
Research focus: Laurence Trussebut legal/royal administration; Trussebut–Shuldham 1438 jury; Lynn merchant context; Watlington/Shouldham archaeology
Notes: Added 10 non-duplicate substantive digital records. Major gains: a 1392 Close Roll mainprise; a directly verified 1405 Patent Roll trespass suit; 1407 wardship-concealment, 1410 Crabhouse licence and 1411 oyer-and-terminer entries from the Henry IV calendars; a 24 Jun 1438 Norfolk IPM placing Thomas Shuldham and Thomas Trussebut on the same Bishop's Lynn jury; ORB's record-based biography of Thomas Trussebut as a Lynn merchant; ADS archaeological reports at 19 Church Road and Watlington Quarry; and East Anglian Archaeology 8's medieval roof-tile kiln at Shouldham. The 1581 lease / 1596 conveyance wording remains unverified from the underlying deed. Summary counts were reconciled to the row classifications, correcting the stale primary-derived/primary-visual metric.
Pass 18 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 18
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 167
New rows this pass: 7
Research focus: Shouldham Trussebut estate scale/expansion; Lok–Trussebut probate network; Lynn civic context; Robert Trusbut testament; George Colt royal-status corroboration
Notes: Added 7 non-duplicate substantive digital records. Major gains come from Susan Maddock's peer-reviewed archival reassessment: a 1386 feoffment adding to the Trussebut estates at Shouldham (NRO HARE 2683–4); Laurence Trussebut's Lynn justice/bishop's-steward/borough-retainer framework; Margery Lok's 1410 testament identifying her as a Trussebut from Shouldham and naming Laurence in the executor/family network; a quantitative statement that Laurence held more than 330 acres in Shouldham, Thorpe and Fincham in addition to the Trussebut manor at Shouldham (NRO HARE 2493); Laurence's precisely dated 12 Dec 1412 Guildhall appearance; and Robert Trusbut's 17 May 1440 testament (NRO NCC Doke 121). Added an independent digitised historical account corroborating George Colt's 1578 knighting. Catalogue-only manuscripts remain distinguished from substantive online texts.
Pass 19 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 19
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 172
New rows this pass: 5
Research focus: Colt generation control around 1570–1601; 1586 sheriffship; 1595 Netherhall litigation; explicit 1601/2 Colt descent; Francis Gawdy legal biography
Notes: Added 5 non-duplicate substantive digital records and materially upgraded WCT-DIG-0144. Major gains: the 1893 scanned transcription of George Colt's Cavendish monument reading 1570; Suckling's 1586 sheriff list naming George Colt of Cavendish; Copinger's citation of a 1595 Exchequer deposition involving George Colt and Netherhall; and, most importantly, Essex Archives D/P 214/25/11 (25 Jan 1601/2), which explicitly identifies George Colt of Cavendish as heir of Sir George Colt through his father Henry Colt and names the younger George's own son/heir Henry. Added a digitised DNB legal biography for Sir Francis Gawdy. The Folger 1578 row is now cautioned because its March 1579 will/age identification conflicts with the published Cavendish monument date; no forced identification has been made.
Pass 20 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 20
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 178
New rows this pass: 6
Research focus: Trusbut–Shuldham 1434 peace-oath link; 1445 Shuldham Wormegay wardship; Narburgh/Bardolf inheritance; Charles Shouldham admission; Philip Gawdy letters; Rich–Hatton bridge
Notes: Added 6 non-duplicate substantive digital records. Major gains: a 1 May 1434 Patent Roll list naming Thomas Trusbutt and Thomas Shuldham in the same Norfolk statutory peace-oath framework; a 13 Mar 1445 Fine Roll committing the marriage of Katharine Curteys, whose father held of the honour of Wyrmegey, to Thomas Shuldham and Thomas Depden; Henry Spelman's Henry VII IPM tracing the manor of Narburgh through Ela Narburgh to her son Thomas Shuldham and noting Bardolf/Wyrmegey tenure; a 1595 Gonville and Caius register identifying Charles Shouldham as the 16-year-old son of Thomas Schouldham, gent., born at Shouldham; the fully digitised 1579–1616 Philip Gawdy correspondence corpus; and the digitised DNB biography of Robert Rich recording his 24 Feb 1605 marriage to Frances Hatton. Catalogue-only Francis Gawdy letters and the 1611/1628 Norfolk deeds remain excluded because no substantive digital copy was verified.
Pass 21 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 21
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 185
New rows this pass: 7
Research focus: Coote→Edleston interpretation clarified; Edleston manorial portfolio; Holmes/Raine executor transition; Eric→Richard Hanby Holmes official record
Notes: Added 7 non-duplicate modern succession-context records and materially clarified WCT-DIG-0025. The title-chain treatment is Coote → Robert Holmes Edleston; Mary Humphreys remains the vendor/provenance bridge named by the 1929 secondary account, not a separately inserted lord without direct proof. Major gains: Durham D/HH 8/2/86 ('Details of R.H. Edleston, his manors, advowsons etc.' c.1930); the 1918-52 E.R. Hanby Holmes steward correspondence over Edleston properties and purchases of manors/manorial rights; 1953-55 papers administering R.H. Edleston's estate through Alice Edleston; Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston's 24 Jan 1956 death plus the 1956 instrument explicitly naming E.R. Hanby Holmes and B.S.L.S. Raine as her executors; Raine's official 1971 Gazette death notice; Eric Hanby Holmes's official 1981 Gazette notice naming Richard John Hanby Holmes among his personal representatives; and independent 2016 evidence of Richard/Andrew Hanby Holmes handling other manorial titles. The exact Watlington-specific 1957 probate, 1966 de bonis non, 1969 assent, 1977 vesting assent and 2017 transfer were searched for but not promoted because substantive public digital copies were not located in this pass.
Pass 22 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 22
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 195
New rows this pass: 10
Research focus: Durham Edleston deep-dive: 1925 Norfolk manor purchase; plans/court papers; North Runcton/Wiggenhall; diaries and photographs
Notes: Added 10 non-duplicate Durham/Edleston records and created a dedicated 'Durham Retrieval Targets' sheet. Strongest gains: D/HH 8/2/39, the 6 Jan 1925 parchment conveyance by which R.H. and Sarah Alice Edleston acquired five Norfolk manors for £75; D/HH 8/2/40-42, steward appointment and printed court notices; D/HH 8/2/51-83, a 1924 colour-wash Lynford estate plan plus 35 papers of 1924-28 correspondence specifically about purchase of manorial rights; D/Ed 10/3/187-212, North Runcton/Hardwick/Setchley administration papers, admission and copy court roll; D/HH 2/7/2041, North Runcton estate book naming R.H. Edleston as trustee; Wiggenhall property papers; and exact photograph/negative references for R.H./Alice Edleston and Norfolk locations. D/Ed 16/49-259 (1887-1952 diaries) and D/Ed 16/260-267 (1920-45 expenditure) are now flagged as critical 1929 retrieval targets. The public Durham/The Story pages verify these physical records but do not expose downloadable scans for the targeted items, so metadata is explicitly distinguished from actual digital copies.
Pass 23 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 23
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 203
New rows this pass: 8
Research focus: Edleston/Hanby Holmes 1950 acquisition mechanics; post-death administration to Mar 1966; 1957 Holmes-Raine conveyance; actual Edleston photo; modern Norfolk manor record
Notes: Added 8 non-duplicate records and expanded Durham Retrieval Targets. Strongest gains: D/HH 8/2/18-20, a 25 Feb 1950 £20 purchase of the Manor of Ellington by R.H. Edleston with E.R. Hanby Holmes's bill of costs and deed schedule; D/HH 8/2/43-50, operational Norfolk manor-court/common-rights working papers; D/HH 8/3/397, 68 papers administering the late R.H. Edleston's fee farm rents through 3 Mar 1966; and D/HH 8/3/50, a 1957 conveyance jointly by Hanby Holmes and Raine. Added an actual directly accessible period photograph of R.H. Edleston, plus the 373-folio 1920-45 expenditure series and Alice Edleston's nine notebooks as priority 1929 targets. Official North Runcton Parish Council minutes from Feb 2017 were also added as direct modern evidence of Hanby Holmes family manorial activity in Norfolk, preserving the source's exact wording 'John Hanby Holmes'.
Pass 24 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 24
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 211
New rows this pass: 8
Research focus: Actual digital asset discovery: Edleston archive PDF, institutional scans, digitised books, Buckden images, Norfolk archive block
Notes: Added 8 non-duplicate records focused on content that can actually be opened online and created a new 'Actual Digital Assets' sheet. Confirmed real public files/images include the directly accessible R.H. Edleston period photograph; Monumental Brass Society Bulletin 122 with 'The Edleston Archive at Durham'; a public-domain 1902 Society of Antiquaries Proceedings PDF; 1914 and 1919 Antiquaries membership-list PDFs; digitised Edleston books on Google Books/Google Play; and historical Buckden image galleries tied to Edleston's restoration. Critically, the downloadable archive survey and Durham catalogue identify D/Ed 15/7/268-309 as a Norfolk-with-Suffolk block within Edleston's monumental-inscription research. The Durham Retrieval Targets sheet was expanded with exact negative-to-print mappings for D/Ed 18/9/1378-1382 so the archive can be asked for the matching digital images rather than a vague photo search.
Pass 25 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 25
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 220
New rows this pass: 9
Research focus: More actual content + second archive: Buckden 677-folio series; Hail Weston 1928/29 court roll; Cambridgeshire Edleston papers; Alice 1952 PDF; aerial/photo/autograph assets
Notes: Added 9 non-duplicate records and expanded both the Actual Digital Assets and Retrieval Targets sheets. Strongest gains: D/Ed 10/4/35-673, a 677-folio Buckden estate-administration correspondence corpus; D/Ed 10/4/704-705, the surviving four-folio Hail Weston manor-court roll draft for 14 Dec 1928 and 3 Dec 1929; Cambridgeshire Archives KHAC1/1300, a separate structured Edleston manorial-paper deposit for Buckden Brittens, Hail Weston and Eynesbury; an actual Buckden Parish Council PDF stating Alice Edleston gifted The Towers in 1952; a 1953 Britain from Above aerial image; and actual online photographs of an 1899 Napoleon platinotype carrying Robert Holmes Edleston's handwritten provenance statement. Added the Chesterton manorial-incident extinguishment papers and Pertenhall purchase correspondence as high-priority legal analogues for the missing Watlington file.
Pass 26 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 26
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 230
New rows this pass: 10
Research focus: Key modern-chain image + Sarah obituary + Alice notebook; Holmes steward/manorial-rights records; National Army Museum Holmes archive
Notes: Added 10 non-duplicate modern records and expanded Actual Digital Assets/Retrieval Targets. Major visual gain: D/Ed 14/5/1-127 contains a single named Teesdale Record Society group photograph showing Bertram Surtees Raine, E.R. Hanby Holmes, R.H. Edleston and Miss Edleston together. Added D/X 332/582, Raine's one-paper obituary of Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston prepared for the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle upon Tyne in 1956, and D/X 332/584, Alice's own historical notebook with photographs. Added direct evidence of E.R. Hanby Holmes as a formal manorial steward c.1918-19 and as a party in a 1933 compensation agreement for extinguished manorial incidents, plus 23 printed Bowes Court Leet/Court Baron notices from the Edleston collection. A separate National Army Museum corpus was identified: Holmes papers (2010-02-1), 32 maps (2010-02-2), photographs (2010-02-8), and a surviving jerkin (2005-04-59). SANT's public digitised Proceedings Dropbox route through 1956 was added as an actual digital asset, but the Sarah obituary has not yet been pinned to a specific PDF/page.
Pass 27 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 27
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 240
New rows this pass: 10
Research focus: Probate-value markers; Edleston Antiquaries photo corpus; item-level Eric papers; Richard NAM objects; published Edleston biographies; Richard→Olivia bridge
Notes: Added 10 non-duplicate records and corrected the Sarah obituary row to flag the two parallel Durham catalogue entries D/X 332/414 and D/X 332/582. New gains include probate-derived estate values (£58,241 15s 5d for Robert Holmes Edleston, reportedly left to Sarah Alice; £131,675 for Sarah Alice), D/Ed 14/2/1-132 with 33 Society of Antiquaries outing photographs and correspondence to both Edlestons, item-level The Story pages for Eric Hanby Holmes's 1907 equipment estimate and his own two-paper 1908 military exercise report, and a substantial National Army Museum material group belonging to Richard John Hanby Holmes from his 1952-54 National Service. Added focused Teesdale Record Society biographical publication routes for Sarah (vol.8, 2000) and Robert (vol.9, 2001), a cautious Richard→Olivia family bridge, and Richard's official Companies House identity record.
Pass 28 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 28
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 253
New rows this pass: 13
Research focus: Critical 1965-76 Edleston-origin records; 1929 transaction analogues; Eric steward diaries/letter books; actual Gazette/Law Directory files; John/Richard identity control
Notes: Added 13 non-duplicate records. Most important modern-chain gain: D/HH 8/3/382-397 preserves Edleston-origin fee-farm records across 1954-66, 1965 and 1969-1976, creating a surviving administrative paper trail through the 1966 and 1969 Watlington transition years and nearly to the 1977 vesting point. Added D/HH 8/3/375-378, a complete March-April 1929 Edleston purchase file containing agreement, conveyance, completion statement, E.R. Hanby Holmes costs and title requisitions, plus the closely preceding 1928 Bolam purchase file and D/Ed 10/3/213-228 manorial-rights correspondence to May 1929. Added Eric's 1925 estate book, professional diary/attendance files (1926-64), steward letter books (1930-40) and the September 1966 appointment of his Bowes successor. Actual downloadable digital assets added: 1915 Law Directory and official Gazette PDFs from 1939, 1941 and 1968. A Trees for Life memorial gives 'John Hanby Holmes' exactly the same 28 Apr 1934-20 Nov 2016 dates independently attributed to Richard John Hanby Holmes, strongly reconciling the wording of the 2017 North Runcton manor minute.
Pass 29 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 29
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 266
New rows this pass: 13
Research focus: Sarah's own title/manorial activity; hidden-manor notes target; late Robert–Holmes correspondence; actual Bowes Museum Edleston estate images
Notes: Added 13 non-duplicate records. The key interpretive gain is that Sarah Alice was independently handling property and manorial-rights matters long before and after Robert's death: D/HH 8/3/70-102 is a complete 1923 acquisition/title file in her own name; D/HH 8/3/108-119 adds further 1937-38 acquisitions and deed schedules; D/HH 8/3/120-121 captures post-Robert title requisitions and a January 1954 conveyance; and D/Ed 10/3/275 is a letter directly to Alice about extinguishing manorial incidents in Wakefield. Added D/Ed 10/3/288, twelve generic 'miscellaneous rough notes concerning manors', as a Critical hidden-Watlington retrieval target because the published D/Ed 10 catalogue has no Watlington keyword hit. Added Burgh Hall purchase correspondence, Glatton manorial-incident correspondence, Bowes profit schedules through 1955, R.H. Edleston jury summonses and direct R.H.–E.R. Hanby Holmes Bowes Manor correspondence through September 1952. Actual digital content added from The Bowes Museum: multiple photographs of objects Alice donated while clearing Robert's estate, including CST.140 carriage boots, plus Alice's quoted contemporary estate-clearance statement.
Pass 30 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 30
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 270
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: 1403 same-record Watlington/Wallington control; fifteenth-century Trusbut mercantile records; exact 1869 Watlington Hall sale-particulars target
Notes: Added 4 non-duplicate records. Strongest direct manor gain: E-CIPM 18-793 (Shouldham, 4 Jul 1403) records Laurence Trussebute holding both a knight's fee across Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey/Shouldham Thorpe/Langham and a separate quarter-fee in Watlington, while the same inquisition separately records Thorpland and Wallington under different tenants. This materially strengthens both Laurence's Watlington tenure chronology and the Wallington ≠ Watlington control. Added an actual scanned Stow Survey notice for John Trusbut, mercer (1437) and a digitised scholarly Borromei-ledger analysis placing John Trusbot [Trusbut] with Robert Baron at £108.13 turnover in 1437–39; both are explicitly labelled identity-unproved London mercantile context. The key late-estate gain is Cambridge ArchiveSearch's exact surviving 'Watlington Hall Estate' sale-particulars target, forty-eight lots, dated 29 Sep 1869; it may resolve the claimed Plestow→Coote sale but does not itself identify the buyer in the indexed description. No new independent public digital 1929 Watlington purchase instrument was located.
Pass 31 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 31
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 275
New rows this pass: 5
Research focus: Reid-family Watlington Hall tenancy/occupancy controls; 1660 Hare–Gansel public network; renewed succession-gap searches
Notes: Added 5 non-duplicate records. UCL's Legacies of British Slavery database now supplies the crucial structural distinction that George Reid senior rented Watlington Hall, while its George Reid junior profile gives the 1805 father–son Hall styling; Westminster School Archives independently identifies the 1808-born George Reid as son of George Reid of Watlington Hall in the 1821 admission context. A scan-backed 1831 peerage entry further corroborates the family designation but is posthumous and is not treated as 1831 occupancy or title evidence. These records create a controlled Reid Hall-occupancy layer without inserting the family into the lordship chain. Separately, an Internet Archive full-text copy of Restituta reproduces a 25 Jun 1660 Norfolk dedication list placing Sir Ralph Hare and 'Greg. Gansel of Watlington, Esq.' together; this strengthens the public-network chronology but is not a conveyance. Renewed searches still did not locate the Hare→Plestow transfer deed, a pre-1883 Coote purchase/title instrument, or the original 1929 Watlington→Edleston conveyance.
Pass 32 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 32
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 281
New rows this pass: 6
Research focus: Plestow manorial memorial and RIBA Hall drawings; 1836/1849 direct Plestow evidence; 1869 sale-date control
Notes: Added 6 non-duplicate records. Strongest title-context gain: Farrer's digitised Church Heraldry of Norfolk transcribes the Watlington memorial styling Sir Thomas Berners Plestow 'many years Lord of the manor of Watlington and Tottenhill', with death date 17 Feb 1819; this is retained as direct manorial-status evidence but 'manor of Watlington' is not automatically equated with Colts/Trussbutts, and the 17 Feb memorial date conflicts with the 18 Feb Norfolk Annals chronology already in the ledger. Added three RIBA Collections drawings for Watlington Hall commissioned for Charles Berners Plestow: proposed front elevation (RIBA31589), executed front elevation (RIBA31591), and the ground-floor stables plan (RIBA95188, Subject Date 1825). Added a directly viewable Morning Post 1 Jun 1849 death clipping stating Charles Berners Plestow died on 30 May at his seat, Watlington Hall, plus the Discover Downham PDF transcribing his unanimous election as Downham Union chairman on 24 Aug 1836 and giving the secondary Donthorn Hall-design attribution. A re-check of the exact Cambridge ArchiveSearch 1869 sale-particulars item now surfaces 4 Aug 1869, whereas Pass 30 recorded 29 Sep 1869; both dates are retained pending direct inspection. No purchaser/title transfer is named by the indexed Cambridge description, and no new original Hare→Plestow, 1869→Coote, or 1929→Edleston conveyance was located.
Pass 33 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 33
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 284
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: 1628 Buttes–Hare Gawsells recovery; 1636 Godbould→Hare deed; 1871 Hare schedule naming Colts Farm
Notes: Added 3 non-duplicate records, one new Actual Digital Asset, and materially upgraded the 1845 White directory row. The strongest early transfer target is NRO Hare 3085 201 x 6, an 11 Apr 1628 sealed deed to lead the uses of a recovery involving Leonard and Johanna Buttes and Sir John Hare over the manors of Shouldham Thorpe/Garboysthorpe, Foston Russels and Gawsells. It is retained as a Very High exact retrieval target because no manuscript scan is public; it is not silently equated with the separate 1632 Colts/Priory-to-Hare statement. The open Godbould PDF adds a directly readable 16 Oct 1636 deed reference (HARE 1965) from John Godbold to John Hare for Thurstons in Fincham and is now logged as ADA-043. The major late-estate control is NRO Hare 5466 222 x 5: its 1871/post-1874 estate schedules explicitly include 'Colts Farm in Shouldham'. This establishes the named farm within Hare estate administration after the claimed 1869 lordship-sale date, but does not prove retention of the lordship and may instead reflect separation of land/farm from title. White's 1845 Shouldham row was upgraded because the same contemporary page names Sir Thomas Hare as lord/major landowner and Charles Lemmon as farmer at Colts Hall.
Pass 34 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 34
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 289
New rows this pass: 5
Research focus: Coote–Spooner–Humphreys identity/probate bridge; George Coote 1871 identity; death and post-Coote family controls
Notes: Added 5 non-duplicate records and 5 Actual Digital Assets. A primary contemporary 22 Feb 1871 official letter fixes George Coote at Smeetham Hall, Sudbury, and Copthall Buildings, London, providing a strong identity control close to the reported 1869 Watlington acquisition without proving that purchase. The Bulmer graveyard index gives Eliza Coote's death as 4 Oct 1877 and George Coote's as 8 Jun 1899 in shared plot 35. The Margaret Spooner PDF independently places her with sister Eliza and brother-in-law George Coote at Smeetham Hall in 1861 and reproduces the 1913 probate-calendar entry granting probate to Rebecca Hurrell Coote and Edward Humphreys, solicitor. Most importantly, Toms Wills independently gives the exact co-grantee wording 'Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys widow and Eliza Coote spinster', materially strengthening the Coote/Spooner/Humphreys provenance identity bridge. A 1908 Suffolk Free Press transcription adds post-George continuity at Chilton Lodge for the Misses Coote and George's surviving collection. None of these records proves the 1929 Watlington conveyance or a separate Mary Humphreys lordship. Edward Humphreys's exact relationship to Mary Rhoda is also not established. The original Hare→Plestow, 1869→Coote title instrument and 1929→Edleston conveyance remain unresolved.
Pass 35 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 35
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 291
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Mary Rhoda explicitly identified as George Coote's daughter in 1891 census extraction; first Plestow generation memorial chronology
Notes: Added 2 non-duplicate records, 1 Actual Digital Asset, and materially upgraded WCT-DIG-0076. The strongest modern-chain gain is a current indexed 1891 census extraction explicitly placing George Coote, aged 69, as head at Great Cornard and Mary Rhoda Spooner Coote, aged 35, as his daughter, both born Witham. This independently strengthens the father→daughter identity behind the modern Mary Humphreys provenance claim, but does not prove inheritance of the lordship or the 1929 Watlington conveyance. On the earlier transition, Farrer's Watlington memorial transcription gives Thomas Plestow's death as 4 Sep 1795 aged 79 and his wife Elizabeth, daughter of W. Berners, as dying 30 Apr 1781 aged 58. That date exactly reconciles the Norfolk Chronicle notice published 5 May 1781 saying Mrs Plestow died 'Monday last'. The first Plestow generation is therefore more precisely anchored at Watlington, while the underlying Hare→Plestow transfer instrument remains missing. No new 1869 Coote purchase deed or Watlington-specific 1929 Edleston conveyance was located.
Pass 36 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 36
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 294
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: George Coote professional/auctioneer control during 1869 Watlington-sale window
Notes: Added 3 non-duplicate records and 2 Actual Digital Assets. The main interpretive gain is that George Coote is now directly documented in the Smeetham Hall history as a Sudbury auctioneer and estate agent as well as farmer, with a substantial household and acreage. Contemporary Suffolk & Essex Free Press transcriptions show him conducting the sale of the Overhall Estate, including copyhold of the manor of Overhall, in early 1869, and conducting further sales at the Maplestead Cock and Pound Farm in September 1869. Those September entries fall within the exact period covered by the conflicting 4 Aug / 29 Sep 1869 dates for the Watlington Hall Estate particulars. This does not disprove the reported Coote purchase; it establishes a crucial evidential control: Coote's appearance in sale material could represent his professional role as auctioneer/agent rather than buyer. The original Watlington sale particulars/conveyance therefore remain essential. No new original Hare→Plestow instrument or 1929 Watlington→Edleston conveyance was located.
Pass 37 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 37
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 298
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: George Coote official commercial profile; Coote daughter order; pre-1869 Smeetham operational records
Notes: Added 4 non-duplicate records, 3 Actual Digital Assets, and upgraded the 1869 Overhall auction row with independent British Newspaper Archive indexing. The strongest new holder-profile source is Tasmanian Parliamentary Paper LC 1870 No.24, which names George Coote of Smeetham Hall as part of the Tasmanian Main Line Railway Company syndicate, describes him as a director of several large insurance companies, and places him inside a company capitalised at £1,000,000. The Bury Free Press transcription of 26 May 1877 identifies Margaret Coote as George's eldest daughter and records her marriage to Henry Stanton Oliver, improving the ordering of the Coote daughters relevant to Mary Rhoda's identification. Two further free newspaper transcriptions document George's Smeetham Hall farm operation in 1860 and his farm steward in 1868. These records strengthen identity, business capacity and family structure but do not resolve the legal 1869 Watlington purchase. No explicit purchaser wording from the 48-lot Watlington sale particulars and no original 1929 Watlington→Edleston conveyance were located.
Pass 38 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 38
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 301
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: Edleston manorial-rights extinguishment: £75 purchase correction, statutory rights checklist, Alconbury/Eynesbury corpora
Notes: Added 3 non-duplicate records, 1 Actual Digital Asset, a new 'Rights Extinguishment' sheet, and 6 critical Durham retrieval targets. The key correction is that the 6 Jan 1925 £75 transaction was the purchase price paid by R.H. and Sarah Edleston for five Norfolk manors, not compensation for extinguished incidents. The separate 28 Nov 1933 D/HH 4/1/536 agreement records Eric R. Hanby Holmes and another on the payer/tenant side, with £38 6s.8d. compensation paid to the Earl of Strathmore as Lord. The Law of Property Act 1922 now supplies an exact rights checklist: ordinary compensable incidents included quit/chief rents, fines, reliefs, heriots, dues/steward fees, certain forfeitures and timber rights, while minerals, sporting rights, fairs/markets, chase/warren, piscary and related substantive rights were preserved unless expressly brought into the agreement. Durham's Edleston archive proves systematic extinguishment activity at Alconbury Weston, Chesterton, Glatton with Holme, Eynesbury and Wakefield, but the public catalogue does not itemise the exact incident(s) or compensation per holding. Watlington-specific extinguishment/compensation remains a critical unresolved question and is now explicitly tracked.
Pass 39 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 39
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 305
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Watlington/Gawsels manor-specific rights; LPA 1925 conveyance rule; MAF 13/27 compensation route; Bowes surviving-right comparators
Notes: Added 4 non-duplicate records, 2 Actual Digital Assets, 7 Rights Extinguishment rows and 3 retrieval targets, and upgraded the 1845/1883 Gawsels rows. The most important Watlington-specific gain is that White 1845 expressly records yearly courts leet and baron at Gawsels with 'fines arbitrary'; White 1883 still reports yearly courts under George Coote. This gives a historically proven incident class — arbitrary fines — that can now be tested against the 1922 compensation machinery, although there is no evidence yet that the fine survived to 1926/1929. Law of Property Act 1925 s.62(3) adds a crucial deed-reading rule: subject to contrary intention, conveyance of a manor carries courts, reliefs, heriots, fines, chief/quit rents, royalties/franchises and the right to compensation for manorial incidents. The National Archives guide identifies MAF 13 (compensation agreements/certificates) and MAF 27 (compensation determinations) as the government-side record series; no Watlington-specific indexed hit was located, so both are now Critical search targets. Finally, Bowes records prove Edleston bought quantified 'Manorial Rights' in 1928, 1931 and 1934 and continued receiving/managing rights-related income, while Holmes administered sporting and stint rights. These Bowes records are deliberately treated as comparators because Bowes had an exceptional trust/freeholder structure.
Pass 40 — 2026-08-31
Pass: 40
Date: 2026-08-31
Rows after pass: 309
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Clarified legal separation of lordship/land/rights; fishing, minerals, sporting rights and post-2013 enforceability
Notes: Added 4 non-duplicate legal-status records, 4 Actual Digital Assets, 5 Rights Extinguishment rows and a new 'Rights Status Guide' sheet. HM Land Registry confirms that lordship title, manorial land and manorial rights are separate elements: a lordship can survive with no land or rights attached, while rights can be severed and owned separately. Fishing/piscary can exist as a profit à prendre in gross — a separately owned right to take fish from another person's land/water — so a lord with a valid retained piscary need not own the lake bed, but the bare lordship does not automatically confer the fishery. Mines/minerals likewise can remain severed from surface ownership; PG65 confirms former-copyhold mineral and sporting rights could survive until expressly extinguished by compensation agreement. Modern enforceability is a separate issue: manorial rights did not automatically cease in October 2013, but loss of overriding status means an unprotected right can be defeated by later registered acquisitions for value. For Watlington the practical test is therefore parcel-by-parcel: prove the historical right, prove it remained with the relevant title/right-holder, prove it burdens the modern land/water, and check whether it was sold, released, extinguished or lost against a later purchaser.
Pass 41 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 41
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 311
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Lossless merge of prior 28-right survival ledger and Pass 27 final rights conclusions into current cumulative workbook
Notes: Preserved every Pass 40 sheet/record and imported the earlier 28-row Rights Survival Ledger verbatim into a new 'Rights Survival Legacy' sheet. Added a new 'Rights Integrated' sheet combining the earlier right-by-right survival conclusions with the newer Pass 38–40 compensation/HMLR evidence without deleting either stream. Restored the crucial 12 Feb 1930 Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys -> Robert Holmes Edleston primary conveyance to the main Digital Records ledger: Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts was conveyed so far as subsisting with 'rights royalties members and appurtenances'. This changes the modern-rights question from whether rights were conveyed at all to which specific rights actually survived to 1930. Also restored the official 1943 Hare Estate sporting-right reservation at Shouldham Forest/Sincks as wider-estate evidence, explicitly preserving the caution that appurtenance to Colts is unproved. Existing Pass 38–40 compensation, statutory, registration and Gawsels evidence remains intact.
Pass 42 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 42
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 320
New rows this pass: 9
Research focus: Restored exact 1587/1597 assurance set, 1749 award extract, full 1930 deed terms and primary 1954/1977/2017 estate chain
Notes: Added 9 non-duplicate records and upgraded WCT-DIG-0310 with the full private 1930 conveyance analysis. HARE 4065 (30 Sep 1587) is the recovery covenant; HARE 2402 (17 Mar 1597) is the actual bargain and sale expressly naming the manor of Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes; HARE 2403 (20 Oct 1597) is a title exemplification that expressly includes a liberty of a fold in Watlyngton and other places. Restored NRO MS 7245, 7B4 as an exact surviving extract of the 1749 Watlington inclosure award. The 12 Feb 1930 private deed is now recorded in full: Humphreys conveys as beneficial owner for £100 four lordships—Watlington; Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham; Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts; and Tottenhill—so far as subsisting, with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances. It recites a 16 Dec 1929 Green/Public Trustee -> Humphreys fee-simple conveyance, now a Critical predecessor-title target. Primary private documents also restore the 1954 selected-manor assent, the two distinct 21 Dec 1977 assents (the first expressly schedules Watlington Colts/Trusbutts; the second vests residual lordships in Richard John Hanby Holmes), and the 22 May 2017 probate grant to Olivia Mary Holmes. No existing Pass 41 material was removed.
Pass 43 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 43
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 325
New rows this pass: 5
Research focus: Shouldham land/title severance: current leasehold status, Sincks ownership, Stow estate context and mineral-resource evidence
Notes: Added 5 non-duplicate records, 4 digital assets, 3 integrated-rights rows, 2 Rights Status Guide rows, 2 rights-status rows and 3 critical retrieval targets. Forestry England's current plan page confirms Shouldham remains leasehold land while West Bilney is freehold. The visually checked forest plan states that a 372ha 999-year lease from the Hare Estate at Stow Bardolph began in 1943 and that sporting rights are retained by the estate and exercised in the Sincks. Shouldham Parish Council independently states in 2021 that Shouldham Sincks is owned by 'Stow Estates'. Current Stow Bardolph estate sites identify an active Stow Estate Trust at Home Farm, but no legal identity bridge between 'Stow Estates' and Stow Estate Trust is assumed. Norfolk minerals planning again separates the landowner from Forestry management and places Shouldham Warren within a silica-sand search area. BGS confirms Leziate sand actually crops out at Shouldham Warren/Sincks and has been worked at the Warren. The result is a much stronger land/right-severance model: Forestry is leaseholder/manager; a separate estate freehold/reversion exists; sporting rights were reserved to the estate; mineral resources physically exist; but none of those facts yet proves a Colts/Trusbutts appurtenance. The actual 1943 lease and current Land Registry freehold/leasehold titles are now Critical.
Pass 44 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 44
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 330
New rows this pass: 5
Research focus: Pre-1930 land severance: Stow ownership of Shouldham Woods, Hare-Hoff c.1900 exchange, 2010 estate continuity, 1798 enclosure/timber evidence
Notes: Added 5 non-duplicate Digital Records, 2 Actual Digital Assets, a new 'Land Severance Timeline' sheet, 3 integrated-rights rows, 2 rights-status rows and 2 retrieval targets. The Forestry England plan now supplies a direct late-19th-century ownership anchor: Stow Bardolph Estate owned Shouldham Woods before the 1943 Forestry lease; the Sincks were substantially wooded by the 1850s and much of the later forest area by the 1880s. NRO HARE 6956/1-5 consists of five c.1900 OS sheets marked for exchange between Hare and Hoff across Shouldham, Shouldham Thorpe, Marham and Wormegay, with HARE 6374-5 expressly related; this is now the strongest concrete pre-1930 parcel-severance event. A visually verified 2010 King's Lynn & West Norfolk planning report describes Hall Farm at Shouldham Thorpe as integral to the Hare family's Stow Estate, a traditional farming and shooting estate of about 11,000 acres in the mid-19th century and about 4,000 acres in 2010. The 1798 Shouldham/Shouldham-Thorpe enclosure schedule is confirmed as an 11-page online-resource reproduction covering allotments, roads, paths, drain, fences and rules, with a manuscript Thomas Hare 'License to fell timber' mounted between pp.8-9. Contemporary 1795-96 enclosure notices also document road reorganisation. None of this is used to merge the Stow/Hare land stream into the Colts lordship without a parcel/right-specific bridge.
Pass 45 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 45
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 332
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Refined land-severance rule; Hare rabbit-warren ownership; 2009 Hare Estate continuity; Fodderston lease-control example; post-Hoff-exchange corroboration
Notes: Added 2 non-duplicate Digital Records, 2 Actual Digital Assets, 2 Rights Status Guide rows, 2 integrated-rights rows, 2 rights-status rows, 2 Land Severance Timeline rows and 2 retrieval targets; also upgraded the existing 1845 Shouldham and 1912 Kelly records. White 1845 now records that Sir Thomas Hare's 2,674 acres included a rabbit warren, names William Brighton as warrener and Charles Lemmon at Colts Hall. The 2009 council conservation statement says Sir John Hare historically held 65% of village fields excluding commons and that much of the parish had remained in the Hare Estate to the document's present day. A particularly useful local control is White 1845 Shouldham Thorpe: Hare was chief owner/lord, yet Fodderston was owned by the Dean and Chapter of Ely and merely leased to Hare with the tithes. This demonstrates why severance of land does NOT automatically mean all rights stayed with the lord: ownership, leasehold control, lordship and income rights could be separated. The 1912 directory was upgraded because Henry Hoff appears as a principal landowner alongside Hare, corroborating that the c.1900 Hare-Hoff exchange produced real ownership consequences while Walter Lemmon remained at Colts Hall. Current rule: every Hare-Hoff sale/exchange and the 1943 Forestry lease must be read for explicit reservations; no blanket assumption that rights were retained or transferred.
Pass 46 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 46
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 336
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Historic sporting enforcement and beneficiary-specific resource rights: Forby gamekeeping, lime digging, peat fuel allotment, warren-to-woodland transition
Notes: Added 4 non-duplicate Digital Records, 2 Actual Digital Assets, 2 Rights Status Guide rows, 2 integrated-rights rows, 2 rights-status rows, 4 Land Severance Timeline rows and 2 retrieval targets. A digital local-history source citing Wentworth's 1799 pleading records Joseph Forby appointed in 1779 as gamekeeper of Sir Thomas Hare's manor at Shouldham and a 1780 gun-seizure dispute, materially strengthening historic active game/sporting control in the wider Hare/Shouldham stream. The visually verified 2009 council statement adds nine acres of 'digging ground' feeding a lime kiln and an 1836 'fuel allotment' where the poor could cut peat, demonstrating that extraction/resource interests could belong to different beneficiaries and cannot all be treated as lord's rights. Explore West Norfolk records Shouldham Warren in existence by 1616 and extensive tree planting over the former warren between 1847 and 1890, clarifying the transition from commercial rabbit-warren landscape to woodland estate later leased to Forestry. No prior records or appendices were removed.
Pass 47 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 47
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 338
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Fuel-allotment legal origin corrected to 1794; 1943 Forestry Commission primary operational anchor; Wentworth citation controlled
Notes: Added 2 non-duplicate Digital Records and 2 Actual Digital Assets while preserving all Pass 46 material. The Charity Commission now identifies Shouldham's Poors' Land and Fuel Allotment governing document as the 1794 Inclosure Award, P.R. 29.(1) p.520, for the general benefit/fuel of poor persons in the parish. White 1845 independently records a 95-acre Shouldham fuel allotment awarded in 1794 and a separate 60-acre Shouldham Thorpe allotment where the poor cut turf and the herbage yielded £7. This corrects Pass 46's shorthand: 1836 is a later village-context/use date, not the creation date. The Forestry Commission's Twenty-Fourth Annual Report independently lists '140. Shouldham, Norfolk' among Commission units for the year ending 30 Sep 1943, primary-corroborating the later Forest Plan's 1943 start date but not substituting for the actual 999-year lease. Citation control on the Forby/Morris gamekeeper case found that direct Vol. II Wentworth scans currently surfaced are headed Assumpsit Special and OCR does not surface Forby/Overland/Jonathan Morris, so the exact primary pleading remains unresolved rather than being falsely elevated. No prior records or appendices were removed.
Pass 48 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 48
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 341
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: 1943 leasehold/freehold/title separation resolved as far as public records allow; archive routes expanded
Notes: Added 3 non-duplicate Digital Records and 3 Actual Digital Assets; added 2 critical retrieval routes and a lease-expiry/reversion guide row. Norfolk County Council now independently states Forestry leased Shouldham Warren from the landowner in 1943 for 999 years. Combined with Forestry England's own plan/current page, the public evidence proves a separate landowner-versus-Forestry leasehold structure and an estate-retained sporting-right stream, but not the present registered freeholder or any Watlington-Colts appurtenance. Historic England proves physical Colts/Trussbutts manor land existed (capital messuage, close, tenements, alder carr, Appletons and later Colts Farm), while 1845-1896 evidence places the Warren/large Shouldham landholding in the Hare/Shouldham stream and the Watlington/Gawsels title in a different stream. The 1930 Edleston deed conveys lordships plus then-subsisting rights/appurtenances but the known wording does not identify the 372ha Shouldham woods. [Inference] Unless a missing deed reconnects them, the evidence strongly points to the 1943 woodland/freehold stream being separate from the Watlington-Colts title stream. Exact current proprietor and lease clauses remain HMLR/original-lease questions.
Pass 49 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 49
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 345
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Non-Norfolk legal/government trail expanded: MAF 50 Treasury Solicitor casework; 1941-43 National Farm Survey ownership/maps; 1959 Forestry acreage; 1945 statutory vesting control
Notes: Added 4 non-duplicate Digital Records, 4 Actual Digital Assets, 6 Search Variants and 3 Land Severance Timeline rows. TNA expressly directs Forestry Commission legal casework undertaken by the Treasury Solicitor to MAF 50, providing a verified national legal-record route for the 1943 lease and related advice/dispute/covenant work. The 1941-43 National Farm Survey (MAF 32 + MAF 73) provides an almost exactly contemporaneous independent route to landowner/occupier status and mapped holding boundaries. Forestry Commission Table 28 for 1959 records the Shouldham unit at 1,290 acres, materially larger than the modern 372ha (~919 acre) Warren/Sincks figure, creating a later boundary/tenure-change question. A further statutory control is now added: the Forestry Act 1945 moved forestry land-holding from the Commissioners to the appropriate Minister while later transitional legislation preserved continuing terms and lease/instrument construction. [Inference] Its precise application to the 1943 Shouldham lease depends on the original lessee wording/title. No reported Shouldham/Hare v Forestry judgment has yet been located in the public indexes searched; absence of a hit is not proof no litigation or unreported casework exists.
Pass 50 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 50
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 352
New rows this pass: 7
Research focus: Forestry acreage chronology corrected/refined: 1949 separate units; 1953 956 acres; 1954 1,290 acres; 1960 Lynn amalgamation; 1965-66 reduction; F37 working-plan route
Notes: Added 7 non-duplicate Digital Records, 7 Actual Digital Assets, 8 Search Variants, 4 Land Severance Timeline rows, 1 Rights Status Guide row and 1 Rights Integrated control. Crucial correction: the 1,290-acre 1959 Shouldham figure is an administrative forest-unit figure and should not be compared directly with the modern 372ha leasehold block. The 1953 report gives 956 acres; the 1954 report gives 1,290, narrowing a 334-acre increase to 1953-54. The 1960 report expressly says 'Lynn Forest comprises the former Gaywood and Shouldham Forests', proving later Lynn totals are combined administrative acreage. Official Forest Research reports continue to identify 'Lynn Forest, Shouldham', proving Shouldham remained a distinct operational/site identity. F37 Forest Histories and Working Plans is elevated to Critical for the exact boundary/tenure history. No exact 1943 lease, supplemental 1953-54 instrument or Lynn/Shouldham F37 piece number has yet been found.
Pass 51 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 51
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 357
New rows this pass: 5
Research focus: Parcel-recovery audit: reputed manor land; local forgotten ownership; 1633-1849 Colts parcel continuity; severance law
Notes: Added 5 non-duplicate Digital Records, 5 Actual Digital Assets, 8 Search Variants, 3 retrieval targets, 5 Land Severance Timeline rows, 1 Rights Status Guide row and a new Land Recovery Audit sheet; upgraded WCT-DIG-0302 and the integrated manorial-land conclusion. Pass 51 establishes a legally real 'forgotten/reputed manor land' route without alleging theft. LPA 1925 s.62(3) expressly includes ground/soil and hereditaments appertaining/reputed to appertain or known as part/member of a manor, while s.62(4)-(5) preserves contrary intention and the transferor's actual title. The 1975 Drabblegate Commons decision is a Norfolk comparator where about six acres reputed to be manor land passed under a manor conveyance/assent. Conversely, Comber [2026] EWHC 1244 (Admin), citing Delacherois, confirms land distinctly conveyed away ceases to form part of the manor. For Colts, the positive parcel inventory now starts with the 1633 capital messuage/close, four tenements, alder carr, Appletons and Batchelors, bridged by the 1811 estate map and 1843 Homestall/Further Homestall terminology. A new exact 1849 HARE 5370 terrier target sits between the tithe and HARE 5466. The 1977 Shouldham Village Green decision proves local ownership could genuinely become unclaimed/forgotten, but there is no evidence the Green was Colts land and no evidence of theft/fraud.
Pass 52 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 52
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 361
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Parcel recovery tightened: 1904/1927 25-inch OS boundary gates; 1910–15 Valuation Office ownership route; HMLR INSPIRE screening
Notes: Added 4 non-duplicate Digital Records, 4 Actual Digital Assets, 6 Search Variants, 3 Land Severance Timeline rows, 2 Land Recovery Audit rows and 2 retrieval targets; upgraded the whole-Colts-Farm audit and HMLR target. The 1904/05 and 1927/28 OS LVII.7 maps now bracket the Edwardian period and place a detailed parcel-geometry snapshot immediately before the 1929/1930 deeds. TNA's Valuation Office Survey is elevated to Critical because its annotated plans and field books can identify owner, occupier, legal interest, tenancy/rent and acreage for Colt's Hall/Farm if the assessment number is recovered. HMLR INSPIRE now supplies a systematic current registered-freehold screening route, but it is explicitly not treated as proprietor or exact-title proof. Existing 1912 Kelly evidence is integrated rather than duplicated: Walter Lemmon remains at Colts Hall and is listed as farmer of Colts Hall Farm while Hare/Hoff are principal landowners. No theft or fraud evidence was found.
Pass 53 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 53
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 365
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Land-recovery scope expanded beyond Colt's Hall: 1597 outlying Colt estate package; unregistered-land method; Lemmon/Pearce occupation and planning-file routes
Notes: Added 4 non-duplicate Digital Records, 4 Actual Digital Assets, 8 Search Variants, 2 Land Recovery Audit rows and 2 retrieval targets; upgraded HARE 2402 and the 1597 Land Severance Timeline row. The principal conceptual gain is that HARE 2402 proves the 1597 Colt→Shouldham bargain-and-sale was geographically broader than the six-acre Colt's Hall core: associated Colt messuages, lands and tenements were conveyed in Runcton Holme, Thorpland, Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, the Wiggenhalls, Terrington and Marshland. These are now treated as an outlying Colt-estate recovery class, NOT automatically as manorial land. HMLR guidance confirms unregistered land is not ownerless and provides a recovery method using adjoining titles and planning ownership certificates. The council conservation statement strengthens multi-generational Lemmon occupation of Colts Hall; Companies House extends the Colts Hall address trail through Alfred George Pearce into the modern period; a 2002 planning decision creates a targeted Certificate A/B ownership-file lead. No theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 54 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 54
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 370
New rows this pass: 5
Research focus: Unregistered/fragmented land clarified: residual manorial-fragment rule; SIM status test; first-registration/lost-deed routes; Trussbut Lodge place-name lead
Notes: Added 5 non-duplicate Digital Records, 5 Actual Digital Assets and 10 Search Variants; upgraded WCT-DIG-0306 (PG22) and tightened the Land Recovery Audit terminology. HMLR PG22 supplies the decisive fragmentation control: manorial land is historic manor land that has not been transferred separately from the lordship and may consist of scattered small pieces. Therefore 'fragmentation' is not shorthand for unclaimed bits belonging to the present lord; only an unsevered residual fragment whose chain reaches the present claimant is a recovery candidate. PG10 makes Form SIM the first modern parcel-status test. PG1 confirms unregistered ownership remains a documentary/root-of-title question, PG2 supplies a reconstruction route if deeds are lost, and PG63 confirms Land Charges is not an ownership register. A separate current-address lead was also found: a property-data page lists 'Trussbut Lodge, 22 The Green' in the same Shouldham street/postcode list as 'Colts Hall, 21 The Green'. The Trussbut name is potentially useful for parcel localisation but its origin/date/title relationship is wholly unproved and it is not treated as manorial-title evidence. No present Colts parcel is yet proved to belong to the current lordship, and no theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 55 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 55
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 375
New rows this pass: 5
Research focus: Residual-soil / enclosure audit + 1512 Watlington court roll received
Notes: Added 5 Digital Records, 5 Actual Digital Assets, 12 Search Variants, 1 Land Severance Timeline row and 3 Land Recovery Audit controls. The newly received SL26/6/CR/1 images upgrade the 1512 Draft Court Roll of the Manor of Watlington from a catalogue-only retrieval target to primary visual material received; its substantive entries are not yet transcribed and the generic Watlington styling is not automatically equated with Colts/Trussbutts. A 1796 Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe enclosure notice now supplies a detailed transformation layer over greens, commons, fen/waste, roads and named Thomas Hare parcels, while bibliographic metadata identifies the 11-page 1798 printed allotment/roads/drain/fences schedule as a critical retrieval target. HMLR PG40 adds the micro-parcel controls for roadway soil, verges/ditches, stream beds and lake beds: small residual pieces are legally possible but the presumptions are rebuttable and do not create Colts ownership. Current conclusion remains that it is not necessary for every historic square yard to have been absorbed into a later registered estate, but no present residual parcel is yet proved to have descended with the Watlington-Colts title. No theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 56 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 56
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 380
New rows this pass: 5
Research focus: Micro-parcel survival strengthened: one-rood poor's land; current charity land; ACC 2022/153; INSPIRE gap refinement; Trussbot lead corrected
Notes: Added 5 non-duplicate Digital Records, 5 Actual Digital Assets, 9 Search Variants, 4 retrieval targets, 3 Land Severance Timeline controls and 4 Land Recovery Audit rows; also upgraded White 1845 and corrected/downgraded the Pass 54 Trussbut Lodge lead without deleting prior history. The strongest new local control is White 1845's separate one-rood 'old poor's land': a quarter-acre historic parcel remained separately identifiable alongside the 95-acre fuel allotment. The Charity Commission now confirms charity 207556 owns and/or leases land/property, while Borough Council FY24_2 material identifies Shouldham Poors Charity allotment land at the village entry from Mill Road as the community-orchard site. These are not Colts land, but they are concrete local examples showing small/special-purpose land streams can persist. TNA ACC 2022/153 adds a potentially major late-15th/early-16th-century extent (?Shouldham, or Fincham/Runcton Holme) plus fuel-allotment digital images, providing a new 1512-adjacent target. HMLR's 28 Aug 2026 INSPIRE-ID lookup sharpens current gap screening but expressly leaves leasehold/other-tenure explanations, so SIM remains decisive. The official 2009 conservation statement closes the modern Trussbot/Trussbut Lodge name as historic continuity evidence: it is a modern/post-war house/name. No present Colts parcel is yet proved to belong to the current lordship and no theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 57 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 57
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 384
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Modern parcel identification: 1985 10-acre freehold 'near the hall'; 1911 small-holdings fragmentation; 1883 pound microparcel; Westgate geometry
Notes: Added 4 Digital Records, 4 Actual Digital Assets, 9 Search Variants, 3 Land Severance Timeline rows and 3 Land Recovery Audit rows; enriched the existing Historic England Colts landscape record with the 1883 livestock-pound microparcel without deleting prior evidence. Strongest new lead: Companies House proves Alfred G. Pearce (Farms) Ltd mortgaged 10 acres of freehold land 'near the hall' in Shouldham in 1985, separately from the company's Mill Farm and Sutton Fen Farm acreage. Alfred George Pearce later used Colts Hall as Companies House correspondence address, making this a very high-priority localisation/title lead, but the mortgage does not identify which hall and does not prove any Colts/manorial connection. Hansard 7 Apr 1911 proves a 30-acre Shouldham field was proposed for small-holdings acquisition and an alternative 16-acre field was offered, adding a direct local fragmentation/reorganisation control. Historic England's 1883 pound site supplies another precise microparcel to trace, while official 2002/2023 planning records provide a Westgate Street geometry bridge for the Pearce/Colts Hall locality. No present residual Colts parcel is yet proved and no theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 58 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 58
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 388
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Dual-sheet Valuation Office correction + 1992 mortgage-release target + protected-core owner-file route
Notes: Added 4 Digital Records, 4 Actual Digital Assets, 9 Search Variants, 2 retrieval targets, 3 Land Severance Timeline rows and 2 Land Recovery Audit rows; enriched existing OS, Valuation Office, Historic England and 1985 mortgage entries without deleting prior evidence. The strongest practical advance is the pre-1930 ownership search: TNA identifies Peterborough (King's Lynn) as IR 127/8 and instructs researchers to move from OS sheet to annotated assessment number to IR 58 field book; Pass 58 corrects the earlier single-sheet assumption because both Norfolk LVII.7 and XLV.16 contain Shouldham. XLV.16 is now captured in 1884/85, 1904/05 and 1927/28 editions. Companies House also fixes an exact 16 Jun 1992 form 403b release/cessation filing in the Pearce Farms charge history, but the public metadata does not identify the affected charge, so it is a retrieval target rather than evidence that the 10-acre parcel was released. Historic England's RSM 30601 / NHLE 1020446 scheduling metadata, paired with the 2001 protection agreement, supplies a new owner/parcel-file route for the surviving Colts-farm earthworks. No present residual Colts parcel is yet proved and no theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 59 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 59
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 389
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: 1512 court roll substantially read + Henry Wyatt/Watlington estate-context bridge
Notes: Added 1 non-duplicate Digital Record and 1 Actual Digital Asset, 9 Search Variants and 1 Land Severance/identity-control row; substantially upgraded the existing 1512 manuscript, TNA-methodology and Land Recovery Audit entries rather than duplicating them. The improved 18-page SL26/6/CR/1 PDF now establishes a general Watlington manorial court on 5 Jun 1512 with at least five customary conveyancing entries. The repeated structure includes surrender into the lord's hands, admission to the recipient, hereditary customary tenure, previously due/accustomed services, entry fines, fealty and full seisin by the rod. This makes the roll a genuine holding-level parcel/title source, while personal names and property clauses remain too uncertain to certify. A new scholarly bridge is Steven Gunn's OUP study of Sir Henry Wyatt's land market: it independently places Watlington within Wyatt's Norfolk acquisitions and later consolidation around Ashill and Watlington, supported by CP 25/1/170/197/106 and citations to NRO Hare 1870–1 and 1875–6. That strengthens Wyatt as the candidate estate context for the 1512 court but does not prove the court is Wyatt's or that either generic Watlington manor is Colts/Trussbutts. TNA's copyhold guidance also sharpens the land-recovery control: the admissions evidence tenant/customary estates, not automatically lord-owned demesne. No present residual Colts parcel is proved and no theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 60 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 60
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 389
New rows this pass: 0
Research focus: Wyatt Norfolk verification + multiple-Watlington identity controls + St Peter advowson test
Notes: Added 0 duplicate/new Digital Records deliberately. Pass 60 materially upgrades existing WCT-DIG-0389, WCT-DIG-0064 and ADA-132; adds 8 Search Variants; and strengthens the 1506->1512 Land Severance identity row and the 1512 Land Recovery Audit. Gunn's searchable text is now more tightly source-controlled: its index explicitly separates Watlington, Norfolk (231-2) from Watlington, Oxon (149), while the Norfolk land-market sentence places Wyatt's purchases northwards to Ashill, Fincham and Watlington and footnote 51 cites NRO Hare 1870-1, Hare 1875-6 and CP25/1/170/197/106. This removes the Oxfordshire ambiguity from the Pass 59 Gunn bridge but still does not identify the 1512 court or connect Wyatt's generic Watlington manor to Colts/Trussbutts. Existing WCT-DIG-0064 is tightened to the exact wording 'John Gawsell, of Wallington and Watlington, viv. 1504', while WCT-DIG-0062 remains a separate generic Manor of Watlington title stream to Thomas Shuldham; together these reinforce the multiple-interest control. The exact HARE item titles/content remain unrecovered. The new decisive research route is the 1506 fine's St Peter advowson: diocesan presentation/institution records around 1506-1512 may independently track the Wyatt/Pynkeney stream. No present residual Colts parcel is proved and no theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 61 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 61
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 389
New rows this pass: 0
Research focus: St Peter advowson vacancy test + Simon Fincham rector/probate source-finder + HARE exact-reference search
Notes: Added 0 new Digital Records deliberately. Pass 61 adds 8 targeted Search Variants and 1 Actual Digital Asset (the digitised 1863 William Blyth Fincham monograph as a source-finder), and tightens the existing 1506->1512 identity-control row and 1512 Land Recovery Audit rather than duplicating evidence. The direct 1506 final concord remains CP 25/1/170/197 no.106: Henry Wyatt, Richard Wyatt and Reynold Pegge acquired the Manor of Watlyngton with land, rent, a free fold and the advowson of St Peter. A later Fincham-history source-finder appears to identify a Simon Fincham/Fyncham as Rector of Watlington with a Norwich will in 1512, but the exact page/index entry has not been independently recovered in a citable primary/index form, so that identity is NOT promoted to evidence. Norfolk Record Society confirms its published Consistory Court will index covers 1370-1550, creating a precise verification route. [Inference] If Simon's Watlington incumbency and 1512 death/probate are confirmed, the first institution/presentation after his vacancy becomes the strongest advowson identity test: identify the presenter/patron and compare that stream with Wyatt/Pynkeney and the 5 Jun 1512 court, while allowing for lapse, alternate turns, grants or feoffees. Exact HARE 1870-1 / 1875-6 catalogue titles/content remain unrecovered. No present residual Colts parcel is proved and no theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 62 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 62
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 390
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: Same-series Wallington/Watlington control + Simon Fyncham rector statement verification + AALT link correction
Notes: Added 1 non-duplicate Digital Record (WCT-DIG-0390), 1 Actual Digital Asset (ADA-134), 8 Search Variants, 1 Land Severance identity-control row and 1 Land Recovery comparator row; upgraded existing rows without deleting prior evidence. The strongest direct-source correction is WCT-DIG-0014: CP25/1/170/197 no.102 (22 May 1506) is confirmed as 3 messuages and 30 acres in Wallyngton' and Thorplond', and its linked AALT endpoint is IMG_0155. The old workbook link IMG_0159 belongs to no.106, the separate 8 Jul 1506 Manor of Watlyngton' / free-fold / St Peter advowson concord, and is corrected. This produces a clean same-series, seven-week Wallington-cum-Thorpland versus Watlington identity control. WCT-DIG-0107 was also directly rechecked: the 13 May 1498 Nicholas Fyncham concord is correctly no.48 and links to IMG_0081; it separately lists Walyngton' and Watlyngton'. A new secondary digital source, WCT-DIG-0390, now verifies the exact compiled statement ‘Simon, Rector of Watlington’ and ‘Will, at Norwich, 1512’, citing ‘Bl.’. This upgrades the rector lead as a recoverable secondary statement only: the underlying Norwich will/register/folio, exact Blyth page and diocesan institution/presentation remain unverified. [Inference] If those are confirmed, the first post-vacancy St Peter presentation becomes a strong independent test of the advowson acquired by Henry Wyatt in 1506. Exact HARE 1870-1 / 1875-6 titles/content remain unrecovered. No present residual Colts parcel is proved and no theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 63 — 2026-09-01
Pass: 63
Date: 2026-09-01
Rows after pass: 391
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: Ramsey Abbey 1435-36 Watlington court identity control + Fyncham family/property bridge
Notes: Added 1 non-duplicate Digital Record (WCT-DIG-0391), 1 Actual Digital Asset (ADA-135), 8 Search Variants, 1 Land Severance identity-control row and 1 Land Recovery comparator row; materially upgraded WCT-DIG-0390 and the 1506->1512/1512-court audit rows without deleting prior evidence. The major new identity control is a search-indexed official Public Records Commission inventory entry within Ramsey Abbey's Norfolk records: 'Watlington, manor. Roll of court baron and customary court, anno 14 Hen. VI' (1435-36). The underlying medieval roll and its modern shelfmark remain unrecovered, but the inventory proves that a generic Watlington manor/customary court existed in a separate Ramsey archival estate context, so the 1512 SL26/6 court cannot be assigned to Wyatt or Colts by manor-name alone. The FINCHAM compilation is also upgraded: John Fyncham's 1494/95-1496 testament/property context includes Shuldham Thorpe, Walyngton and Watlington and names 'magistro Symeon Fyncham'; the related child-list states Simon was Rector of Watlington with a Norwich will in 1512. This is a stronger secondary family/property/clerical bridge, but the same-person identity and underlying probate/institution evidence remain unproved, especially because multiple Simeon Fynchams occur in adjacent generations. TNA/NRO also exposes a precise 4 Nov 1496 John Fyncham IPM target, Hare 2026 193 x 5, but its catalogue description does not itself mention Watlington and it is retained as a retrieval target rather than promoted as direct Watlington evidence. Exact HARE 1870-1 / 1875-6 titles/content remain unrecovered. No present residual Colts parcel is proved and no theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 64 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 64
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 393
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Watlington-with-West Dereham court-series bridge + collateral Tittleshall/Trusbutts court-book split
Notes: Checkpoint only; research continued beyond this pass. Added WCT-DIG-0392 and WCT-DIG-0393, ADA-136/137, 10 search variants, 2 Land Severance identity rows and 2 Land Recovery comparator rows; materially upgraded WCT-DIG-0058 and the 1512 audit. Searchable catalogue metadata now names a 'Manor of Watlington-with-West Dereham. Court (Norfolk)' series for 1540-1566 and 1786-1909. [Inference] Its 1540 start closely matches the independently logged antiquarian statement that William Butts held his first court in 32 Hen VIII for the former West Dereham Abbey manor in Watlington as farmer of the King, making the first roll a critical identity test against SL26/6. TNA's official 2002 NRO accessions also verify ACC 2002/145: 'Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall manor: court book 1622-1785', plus separate West Dereham manor court minutes 1792-1856. Tittleshall alias Trusbutts is deliberately treated as a collateral Runcton Holme/Tottenhall comparator, not Watlington-Colts proof. The Public Records inventory's separate 'Watlington, maner' et advoc'' OCR phrase remains heading-ambiguous and is not assigned to Ramsey. HARE 1870-1 / 1875-6 remain unresolved; no present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 65 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 65
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 395
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: 1330 Bryseyard Watlington-and-Longham split + Longham-Priors-Coke/Holkham competing stream
Notes: Checkpoint after continuing past Pass 64. Added WCT-DIG-0394/0395, ADA-138/139, 10 Search Variants, 2 Land Severance identity rows and 2 Land Recovery comparator rows; updated the 1512 audit and Rights Survival Legacy without deleting earlier evidence. The 1329/30 Thomas Bardolf IPM is now separately source-controlled: Geoffrey Bryseyard holds a manor in Watlington and Longham for one knight's fee, while another tenant group holds a separate one-fee Watlington/Foston/Wallington/Setchey/Hardwick block; both owe Castelward/Waytefee, demonstrating that common superior-honour service does not identify one subordinate manor. Modern scholarship citing Holkham Estate Catalogue vol.5 doc.650 states Coke bought Longham Priors from Futter on 28 Sep 1610, and Tawney lists 1611 Tittleshall Book 62 material for 'Longham and Watlington' and 'Watlington and Priors'. [Inference] This creates a strong competing Longham-Priors-Coke stream and weakens the hypothesis that the 1330 Bryseyard manor is the direct antecedent of the Shouldham-centred Trusbut fee. The actual medieval descent bridge and Holkham manuscripts remain unrecovered. HARE 1870-1 / 1875-6, Simon Fyncham's primary 1512 probate/institution, the first 1540 Watlington-with-West Dereham roll, and the lord/steward identities in SL26/6 remain unresolved. No present residual Colts parcel is proved and no theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 66 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 66
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 397
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Kervile Watlington capital-messuage/foldcourse stream + exact West Dereham court film references
Notes: Added 2 non-duplicate Digital Records (WCT-DIG-0396/0397), ADA-140/141/142, 10 Search Variants, 1 Land Severance identity-control row and 1 Land Recovery comparator; materially upgraded WCT-DIG-0011 and WCT-DIG-0392 and backfilled Pass Added for WCT-DIG-0392-0395. Direct NCC probate transcriptions now expose Thomas Kervyle the younger's 1522 multi-place Watlington estate and Thomas Kervile elder's will dated 31 Jan 1522/proved 1535 with a capital messuage, rents/reversions/suits/services/wards/marriages/reliefs/escheats, windmills and liberties of a foldcourse-and-a-half in Watlington. This is a critical competing Kervile property/rights stream, not proof of a Kervile manor or Colts identity. The exact catalogue route for Watlington-with-West Dereham is now FamilySearch catalog 438436, with FHL films 1472612 item 10 and 1702188 item 14, but the 1540 opening roll remains uninspected. The 1427 Trusbut/Kervyle split is source-controlled to E-CIPM 22-799, TNA C 139/30/56 mm.13,15. [Inference] continuity from Robert Kervyle's 1427 quarter-fee into the Tudor Kervile estate is possible but unproved. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 67 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 67
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 400
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: Kervile continuity test: 1440 Geoffrey anchor + 1567 Robert/Humphrey of Watlyngton + swan-mark branch control
Notes: Added 3 non-duplicate Digital Records (WCT-DIG-0398-0400), ADA-143/144/145 and 10 Search Variants; upgraded WCT-DIG-0011 and the existing Kervile Land Severance / Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. Mapping the Medieval Countryside directly names Geoffrey Kervyle as a Norfolk juror at Thetford on 19 Feb 1440 (TNA C 139/98/28 mm.11-12), providing a new primary-derived chronological bridge candidate after the secondary Robert Kerville d.1434 notice. More importantly, the Hilary 1567 Common Pleas index CP40/1253 d.280 directly styles both Robert Kervyle and Humphrey Kervyle as gentlemen of Watlyngton, independently proving persistence of a Kervile Watlington gentry stream after the 1522/1535 capital-messuage/foldcourse wills and before the 1597 Colts deed. A digitised west-Norfolk swan-mark study separately names Humphrey Kervyle of Watlington as son of Humphrey Kervyle of Lynn, alive in 1535, reinforcing the need to distinguish same-name branches. [Inference] Long Kervile continuity at Watlington is now materially stronger, but the generation-by-generation descent of the 1427 quarter-fee into the Tudor estate and then into the 1567 men remains unproved. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 68 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 68
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 403
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: Direct 1434/35 Kervile Manor of Watlington will + de Watlington provenance + post-1563 Gawsell transfer lead
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0401-0403, ADA-146-148 and 10 Search Variants; upgraded WCT-DIG-0012 and the Kervile Land Severance / Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. The decisive new source is Daniel Gurney's 1858 printed transcription of Robert Kervyle of Watlington's will, expressly stated to be taken from the Bishop of Norwich's Register Surflete. Robert's last will dated 19 Nov 1434, proved Norwich 12 Jul 1435, directly devises to son Richard 'my manor' in Watlington, formerly associated with John son of William son of Thomas de Watlington, together with its lands, tenements and appurtenances. This upgrades the Kervile branch from a quarter-fee/property comparator to a directly evidenced competing MANOR OF WATLINGTON stream. [Inference] Because probate falls immediately before the generic 14 Hen VI (1435-36) Watlington court roll, Richard Kervyle is now a prime lord/tenant name to test when that roll is recovered, but no identity is asserted. Added a 2 Sep 1402 Robert ?Keruyle junior Norfolk-juror control and the qualified 1858 statement that the Kerviles appear to have conveyed their Watlington estate to the Gawsels shortly after the 1563 Visitation; the latter is retained strictly as a missing-deed retrieval bridge, not transfer proof. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 69 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 69
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 406
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: Kervile succession narrowed: Richard eldest -> Geoffrey line + 1340/1361 de Watlyngton provenance network + Gawsells-origin correction
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0404-0406, ADA-149-151 and 10 Search Variants; upgraded WCT-DIG-0401, WCT-DIG-0403 and WCT-DIG-0058; rewrote the Kervile Land Severance / Land Recovery rows and added separate de Watlyngton provenance-control rows without deleting prior evidence. The Norfolk Visitation (Harl. 1552) directly names Robert Kervyle of Watlington, Richard as eldest son, Geoffrey as second son of Islington/Marshland, and Geoffrey's son Thomas as of Watlington. Read with Robert's 1434 will, which directly devised the manor to Richard, this narrows the missing succession to a specific Richard -> Geoffrey/Geoffrey-line event; the actual death/reversion/surrender/settlement remains unfound. Two new royal-record controls push the provenance backward: in 1340 Adam son of John de Watlyngton is directly tied to two acres in Thorpland, and in 1361 John de Watlyngton and Edmund Kervyle are jointly named in a Blackborough mortmain licence covering west-Norfolk property. These do not prove identity with the will's John son of William son of Thomas de Wathlington but establish a real pre-1434 de Watlyngton/Kervyle network. Correction/control: existing 1867 court-roll notes already place Gawsells Manor in Watlington under William Butts jure uxoris in 1542-43, so Gurney's qualified post-1563 Kervile->Gawsell conveyance cannot explain the origin of Gawsells Manor; if real, it would be a later additional transfer/merger/augmentation. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 70 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 70
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 408
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Richard Kervyle d.s.p. sourced + manor/Kreykyscroft remainder distinction + Islington Court Rolls priority
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0407/0408 and 10 Search Variants; upgraded WCT-DIG-0401, WCT-DIG-0404, WCT-DIG-0391 and ADA-146; rewrote the Kervile Land Severance / Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. Gurney's corrected dedicated Watlington pedigree explicitly marks Richard Kervyle, Robert's eldest son and 1434 manor devisee, 'obiit s.p.' (died without issue), and the Supplement explains that Kerville pedigree corrections were chiefly taken from the 1563 and 1612 Visitations and the Islington Court Rolls. This sharply elevates the Islington court rolls as the best next source for the succession. The more important legal correction comes from Robert's actual 1434 will: the Watlington manor is devised to Richard, his heirs and assigns, while the separate 20-acre Kreykyscroft holding has an express conditional remainder to Geoffrey if Richard dies without bodily heirs before Elizabeth. No equivalent Geoffrey remainder is stated for the manor. Therefore Richard's childlessness alone does not prove that the manor passed to Geoffrey. [Inference] Collateral inheritance remains possible only if Richard died seised without intervening alienation and Geoffrey was the relevant heir; those facts remain unproved. The 1435-36 Watlington court roll remains a critical Richard-name test, and its exact modern shelfmark is still unrecovered. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 71 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 71
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 410
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Source-control correction: Islington Court Rolls not proved source for Richard d.s.p. + direct Geoffrey Islington fee-simple estate
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0409/0410, ADA-152/153/154 and 10 Search Variants; corrected WCT-DIG-0407 and WCT-DIG-0404 plus the Kervile Land Severance / Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. The central Pass 71 correction is source attribution: Gurney's explicit statement that pedigree corrections were chiefly taken from the 1563 and 1612 Visitations and the Islington Court Rolls introduces his corrected WIGGENHALL ST MARY'S Kervile pedigree. The separate Watlington pedigree appears later and marks Richard, Robert's eldest son, 'obiit s.p.' without an equivalent statement identifying the Islington rolls as its source. Pass 70 therefore over-attributed the evidence basis. Richard d.s.p. remains a secondary Gurney statement whose primary source is unidentified. Separately, Robert's actual 1434 will directly orders Geoffrey to be enfeoffed in fee simple in a messuage at Islington plus named parcels, proving Geoffrey had an independent Islington estate apart from Richard's Watlington manor. Official British Library metadata identifies Tilney-with-Islington manorial compotus rolls for 1496-1506 (Add Roll 67553-67556), a useful later branch retrieval route but too late to prove Richard's immediate succession. The public NRA inventory also locates an Islington court book of 1823, confirming later survival but not Gurney's earlier rolls. No primary Richard death/heirship or manor-transfer instrument has yet been found. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 72 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 72
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 412
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Shuldham-line Watlington title chronology identifies 1435-36 court candidate + 1373/1386 Shuldham-Trussbut property crossover
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0411/0412, ADA-155/156 and 10 Search Variants; materially upgraded WCT-DIG-0062, WCT-DIG-0085 and WCT-DIG-0391; added two Land Severance and two Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. The key new extraction from Norfolk Archaeology VI pp.300-303 is the exact title chronology for a distinct Manor of Watlington: Thomas Hawdekyn presented to Watlington church in right of his wife Katherine in 1425 and 1427; Katherine Curteys, her niece and heir, received livery of the manor in 22 Hen VI (1443-44) and presented in 1451; Thomas Shuldham likely succeeded thereafter, and his 1467 will left the manors of Shouldham, Burnham Deepdale and Watlington to wife Margaret for life. [Inference] This makes the Hawdekyn/Bartholomew-descended manor a strong candidate for the otherwise anonymous 1435-36 Watlington court, because that court falls inside the documented 1427-to-1443 title window; the court heading is still required. The same article also cites a 1373 deed by William de Shuldham securing land in Shuldham to Thomas son of Nicholas Trussbut and a 26 Jul 1386 release by Agnes, William's widow, to Trussbut. This is direct Shuldham-Trussbut property interaction, but the land is in Shuldham and is not proved to be Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 73 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 73
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 414
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Bartholomew coheir -> Shuldham branch proves Trussbut deed sits inside Watlington title family + 1454 Thomas Sholdham esquire control
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0413/0414, ADA-157/158 and 10 Search Variants; materially upgraded WCT-DIG-0104, WCT-DIG-0411 and WCT-DIG-0412 plus the Shuldham Land Severance / Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. The major result is that the 1373/1386 Shuldham-Trussbut land transaction is not merely between two unrelated local families: the Henry-VI Watlington title pedigree states that John Bartholomew held the Manor of Watlington and that his daughters included Margaret, who married John Glemsford and carried the manor to him, and Agnes, who married William de Shuldham. The same William/Agnes couple are the parties whose 1373/1386 deeds protected and then released land in Shuldham to Thomas son of Nicholas Trussbut. Thus Trussbut directly transacted with a coheir family branch of this Watlington-manor title pedigree. The land remains expressly in Shuldham, so no Watlington parcel or manor merger is proved. The Shuldham route to later Thomas is also refined as a coheir-family route through Agnes rather than an unrelated later acquisition; Dashwood's statement that Thomas 'would succeed' after Katherine Curteys remains inference about the operative transition. A contemporary Paston petition draft dated 1454? independently names Thomas Sholdham, esquire, supplying a post-1451 status/date control but not styling him of Watlington. Modern HARE references for the 1373/1386 deeds, Curteys livery, Thomas's exact succession instrument and the 1435-36 court roll remain unresolved. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 74 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 74
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 416
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Fyncham-Trusbut marriage immediately precedes 1403 Watlington fee + probable 1474 Deepdale severance from Shuldham grouped estate
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0415/0416, ADA-159/160/161 and 12 Search Variants; materially upgraded existing WCT-DIG-0008 instead of duplicating the already-ledgered 1403 Lawrence Trussebute record; added two Land Severance and two Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. Re-verification of E-CIPM 18-793 (Norfolk inquisition at Shouldham, 4 Jul 1403; TNA C 137/37/39 mm.9-10, E 149/81/3 m.3) shows Lawrence Trussebute holding both a separate Watlington quarter-fee and a full fee across Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, Shouldham Thorpe and Langham. The same schedule separately puts a Foston/Shouldham Thorpe quarter-fee and a Fincham/West Dereham/Roxham/Fordham fee with John de Fyncham and others. A digitised Fincham pedigree, checked by page image, states Alicia Fyncham married Laurence Trusbutt of Shouldham, Esquire, citing a marriage settlement in 17 Ric II (1393-94). This is a tight family/tenure network but the original settlement and acquisition mechanism are missing, so no claim is made that Alicia brought Laurence's Watlington fee. Separately, a derivative charter transcription dated 5 Oct 1474 gives Margaret widow of Thomas Shuldham senior a life annuity of 8 marks 6s.8d. from the manor of Depdale called Holkhammes, from John Fyncham and feoffees; Fincham material says John purchased Burnham Deepdale in 1474, while his 1494 will names Depdale and NRO Hare 2026 193 x 5 (4 Nov 1496) officially confirms a manor in Depdale and Brankastir. [Inference] This strongly indicates Deepdale was being severed/restructured from Thomas Shuldham's 1467 grouped Watlington/Shouldham/Deepdale estate, but the operative purchase deed is still missing. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 75 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 75
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 418
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: 1403->1427 recurring Trusbut one-fee block + exact HARE 2683-4 / HARE 2493 archive-target confirmation
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0417/0418, ADA-162/163 and 10 Search Variants; corrected the earlier WCT-DIG-0011 shorthand 'direct continuity from Laurence to Thomas' to the stricter conclusion 'strong recurring fee-block continuity; holder relationship unproved'; upgraded WCT-DIG-0008, WCT-DIG-0161 and WCT-DIG-0164; added one Land Severance and one Land Recovery row without deleting prior evidence. Direct comparison now shows Lawrence Trussebute's 1403 one-fee block (Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, Shouldham Thorpe, Langham) and Thomas Trusbut's 1427 one-fee block (Watlington, Tottenhill, Garbodesthorp, Setchey, ?Longham) share the same fee quantity and three exact places; later official NRO records prove the alias 'Shouldham Thorpe alias Garboysthorpe', making Garbodesthorp a strong likely historical form of the same locality. The fifth element remains unresolved and is not forced: Langham != automatically ?Longham. Modern scholarship places Lawrence dead by Easter 1418, narrowing the holder transition to c.1418-1427. The same chapter's source notes are now explicitly re-controlled: footnote 29 = NRO HARE 2683-4 for 1386 additions to the Trussebut estates in Shouldham; footnote 42 = NRO HARE 2493 for Lawrence's 330+ acres in Shouldham, Thorpe and Fincham in addition to the Trussebut manor at Shouldham. These exact manuscripts are now the highest-priority physical-parcel and succession targets. No source yet proves Thomas's kinship to Lawrence or automatic identity of the fee with later Watlington-Colts/Trusbuttes. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 76 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 76
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 420
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Runcton-Holme lease re-extracted + direct Trusbut-heiress-to-Thomas-Colt visitation bridge + Runcton archive corpus
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0419/0420, ADA-164/165/166 and 12 Search Variants; materially upgraded existing WCT-DIG-0033 (1413-14 Runcton Holme lease), WCT-DIG-0035 (1561 Colt/Trusbut visitation), WCT-DIG-0026 (Nicholas-vs-Thomas Colt correction) and WCT-DIG-0142 (Joan/John Colt succession), and added two Land Severance plus two Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. Pass 76 visually rechecked Christ's College Muniments Inventory page 47: Bromhill Site MR7 item 53(1) is a 1 Hen V, 60-year lease to Laurence ?Trussebut [alternative catalogue reading Gressebut] of all lands, tenements, rents and tithes in Runcton Holme, rent 20s p.a., with catalogue total about 4a 3r 20p. The surname and measurements remain explicitly uncertain. The same institutional catalogue separately exposes Barnham/Runcton Holme MR4,6 writings, court rolls and rental of the Manor of Runcton, including Wallington/Thorpeland material — a new exact archive corpus for parcel/tenant recovery. The 1561 Suffolk Visitation was re-extracted from Metcalfe's full text: Thomas Cowlte married Jane, daughter and heir of a Trusbut of Norfolk, and John was son/heir; the arms quarter Colt with Trusbut. This is the strongest accessible heraldic heiress bridge into Colt and supersedes later Battle Abbey Roll wording that says Nicholas Colt. BL Harley MS 1177 is now fixed as the 1618 Samuel Lennard manuscript copy target for Harvey's Suffolk 1561/Norfolk 1563 visitation books. DNB independently identifies Joan Trusbut as Thomas Colt's widow and later Sir William Parr's wife. The decisive remaining gap is not whether a Trusbut heiress entered Colt — that is now strongly/directly evidenced — but WHAT Norfolk estate she inherited: recover Joan wife of Parr's IPM (15 Edw IV no.34), John Colt's reported 1485 livery and primary proof naming her father/seat, then compare that estate with the 1403/1427 Trusbut fee and 1597 Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 77 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 77
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 422
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Joan Parr IPM exact reference fixed + John Colt heir/wardship sequence + 1485 livery source ceiling
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0421/0422, ADA-167/168 and 12 Search Variants; upgraded WCT-DIG-0142 and WCT-DIG-0420 and rewrote the Trusbut-heiress Land Severance/Land Recovery rows plus added focused wardship/livery rows without deleting prior evidence. The strongest Pass 77 gain is Copinger's exact source note: the Cavendish account states Joan, widow of Thomas Colt and wife of Sir William Parr, died in 13 Edw IV; the manor then passed to her son and heir John Colt; footnote 1 explicitly identifies 'Inquisition p.m. ... Joan wife of Sir William Parre, 15 Edw. IV. 34'; and John is stated to have been Parr's ward in 1 Hen VII. This fixes the exact medieval IPM retrieval target and the heir/wardship sequence, although the actual IPM estate schedule remains unseen. Modern BP2003-derived ThePeerage entries separately report that Joan was daughter of John Trusbut of Runcton Holme and that John Colt had livery of his lands on 5 Nov 1485. Those two claims are retained as precise retrieval coordinates only: no primary father/seat source or livery instrument was recovered in this pass. The livery date falls within 1 Hen VII and is chronologically consistent with the wardship statement, making Fine Roll/Chancery/escheator searches on that exact date the next step. The decisive question remains whether Joan's IPM or John's livery lists Norfolk Trusbut property at Watlington, Runcton Holme, Shouldham, Tottenhill, Setchey or related places. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 78 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 78
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 424
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Joan Parr IPM yields actual Clayhall manor + death-date reconciliation to 4 Aug 1473
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0423/0424, ADA-169/170 and 12 Search Variants; upgraded WCT-DIG-0421, WCT-DIG-0142 and WCT-DIG-0420; sharpened the heiress/IPM Land Severance and Land Recovery rows and added a new multi-estate IPM row without deleting prior evidence. The major breakthrough is Daniel Lysons' Barking account, which states that Joan, relict of Thomas Colt/Coke and wife of Sir William Parre, died seised of the Manor of Clayhall and that it descended to John Colte, her son by her first husband; Lysons explicitly cites 'Esch. 15 Edw. IV. No. 34', the same Joan IPM number independently cited by Copinger for the Cavendish succession. Thus the missing IPM trail now yields an actual second manor, not merely a record number. A separate Essex history independently corroborates Joan holding Clayhall in 1475 under Barking Abbey by knight service, rent 15s.3d. and distinctive services. Chronology is also corrected: Copinger's 'Monday before the feast of St Lawrence, 13 Edw IV' resolves to 4 Aug 1473, matching DNB's 1473 death year. Lysons' statement that Joan died in 1475 likely conflates the later 15 Edw IV IPM year with death; this is labelled inference pending the original IPM. Clayhall is Essex property and is NOT assumed to be Trusbut-derived. The decisive target remains the complete 15 Edw IV no.34 IPM/C140 return to see whether Norfolk holdings at Watlington, Runcton Holme, Shouldham, Tottenhill or Setchey were included. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 79 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 79
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 426
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Third manor Suffolks tied to Joan's same IPM + scanned Calendarium IV/C140/C66 retrieval route
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0425/0426, ADA-171/172/173 and 12 Search Variants; upgraded WCT-DIG-0423 and WCT-DIG-0421; expanded the Joan-IPM and John-livery Land Severance / Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. The substantive title gain is a third estate tied to exactly 'Esch. 15 Edw. IV. No. 34': William Robinson's 1823 Enfield history states that Joan died seised of the Manor of Suffolks in Enfield and that it was inherited by John Colt. Robinson's surrounding genealogy is demonstrably corrupted — he reverses the Thomas Colt/Sir Parr marriage order, calls Parr 'Sir Richard', and gives 1476 — so Pass 79 preserves only the property/source citation and rejects those genealogy/date statements. We now have three independent property contexts using the same IPM number: Cavendish/Colt's Hall (Copinger), Clayhall/Barking (Lysons), and Suffolks/Enfield (Robinson). Official TNA guidance confirms that Edward IV Chancery IPMs are in C140, Exchequer counterparts in E149, and that for 1447-1485 land lists the 1828 Calendarium vol.IV should be consulted; a full 756-page public-domain scan of that volume is now fixed as an actual digital asset. TNA also explicitly states that post-IPM livery/wardship records can often be found in Patent Rolls C66, correcting the John Colt search priority from Fine-Roll-heavy searching to C66/Calendar of Patent Rolls Henry VII 1485-1494 first. The actual Calendarium Joan entry and modern C140 file/item are not yet extracted, and no Norfolk property appears in the three recovered estate contexts. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 80 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 80
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 429
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: Joan fifteenth-year inquisition explicitly includes NORFOLK + Gough Shingham father/seat conflict + 13 Edw IV Raughton control
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0427/0428/0429, ADA-174/175 and 14 Search Variants; upgraded WCT-DIG-0421, 0423, 0425, 0035 and Historic England WCT-DIG-0015/row16; added two Land Severance and two Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. The Pass 80 breakthrough is Charles Rogers' explicit statement that a fifteenth-year inquisition for the same Johanna, wife of William Parre and formerly married Thomas Colt, contained an extensive list of possessions in Berkshire, Middlesex, NORFOLK, Essex and Suffolk. Norfolk is therefore no longer merely a hoped-for return: its presence is explicitly reported by an old IPM-based secondary source, although the exact Norfolk manors/parcels remain missing and Rogers' adjacent Richard-II footnote is anomalous. Rogers separately describes a 13 Edw IV inquisition concerning tofts at Carlisle and Raughton in Cumberland; Pass 80 creates a strict Raughton-Cumberland != Runcton-Holme-Norfolk control. Richard Gough's earlier Roydon monumental-brass survey records Trusbut gyronny arms over Joan, Colt impaling Trusbut, and states she was daughter of John Trusbut of SHINGHAM, Norfolk; this conflicts with modern BP2003-derived RUNCTON HOLME and formally opens a father/seat source conflict. Gough's 1475 death date is not adopted. The next target is now exact Norfolk-place extraction from Calendarium/C140/E149, with Watlington, Runcton Holme, Shingham, Shouldham, Tottenhill and Setchey all tested independently. PASS80 also appends the previously pending Pass66 TXT correction: ADA-142 is Watlington-with-West Dereham catalogue/film metadata; the 1427 Mapping IPM was an upgrade of an existing Digital Record, not ADA-142. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 81 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 81
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 432
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: Rogers Norfolk statement visually verified + Richard-II footnote proven printed + Materials p127 false livery lead closed
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0430/0431/0432, ADA-176/177/178 and 12 Search Variants; upgraded WCT-DIG-0427 and WCT-DIG-0429 plus the Norfolk-IPM and seat-conflict Land Severance / Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. Pass 81 directly opened and visually inspected Rogers' scanned printed pages: the fifteenth-year sentence itself says 'an extensive list of possessions in Berkshire, Middlesex, Norfolk, Essex, and Suffolk', while the printed footnote itself visibly says 'Cal. Inquis. post mortem, Richard II., p.72.' This proves both the Norfolk wording and the citation defect are genuinely in the 1879 source rather than OCR. A second source-control result closes a misleading path: Rogers' suggestion to see Materials for History of Henry VII vol.I p.127 etc. corresponds to Thomas Colt's Yorkist legal dispute with Roger Thorpe after Wakefield; History of Parliament and DNB point Campbell I 127-129 to those proceedings. It is therefore NOT evidence for John Colt's reported 5 Nov 1485 livery, and livery searching remains prioritized in C66/Patent Rolls. Finally, the father/seat conflict is refined: the 1561 visitation says only Trusbut of Norfolk; Gough says John Trusbut of Shingham; Powys-Lybbe preserves 'John Trusbut of Holme, Norfolk'; BP2003-derived sites say Runcton Holme. 'Holme' must not be silently expanded to Runcton. The actual 15 Edw IV no.34 Norfolk place list has still not been extracted from Calendarium/C140/E149, so no Watlington/Shouldham/Runcton/Shingham holding is yet claimed from Joan's IPM. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 82 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 82
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 436
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: C 140/52/13 modern target + Boxstead and Peyton/Peytones added to Joan IPM + Bodleian 1478 writ
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0433/0434/0435/0436, ADA-179/180/181/182 and 12 Search Variants; upgraded WCT-DIG-0426 and appended cumulative Land Severance / Land Recovery rows without deleting prior evidence. Pass 82 breaks the modern-reference bottleneck at the finding-aid level: VCH Barking explicitly cites C 140/52/13 for its Joan wife of William Parre / relict of Thomas Colte Clayhall passage. [Inference] C 140/52/13 is therefore the leading modern Chancery mapping for the old 15 Edw IV no.34 trail, but the actual membranes still must be read before the mapping is declared final. Copinger supplies two additional estate contexts using exactly I.P.M. 15 Edw IV. 34: BOXSTEAD MANOR and 'Pey tones'/Peyton Hall Manor in Suffolk. The reconstructed numbered-IPM packet now has five named property contexts: Cavendish/Colt's Hall, Clayhall, Suffolks, Boxstead and Peyton/Peytones, while Rogers' source-verified statement still reports Norfolk among the counties. Bodleian Charters Catalogue also identifies MS. Ch. Norfolk 340, dated Westminster 28 Jan 17 Edw IV (1478), a surviving commission/writ to take an inquisition of the lands of Joan late wife of Sir William Parre and noting death in 13 Edw IV. The Bodleian collection name is not treated as proof that those lands were in Norfolk. Exact Norfolk manors/parcels remain unextracted; no Watlington/Shouldham/Shingham/Runcton holding is claimed from Joan's IPM yet. No present residual Colts parcel or theft/fraud is proved.
Pass 83 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 83
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 438
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Strict-dedupe source-control: Bodleian Joan writ corrected to Ch.339 + John Tymperley Norfolk/Suffolk escheator + C140 citation conflict narrowed
Notes: No previously covered Joan/John Colt/Rogers/Copinger biography was counted as new. Corrected WCT-DIG-0436 and ADA-182 from MS. Ch. Norfolk 340 to MS. Ch. Norfolk 339; upgraded WCT-DIG-0433/ADA-179 so C 140/52 + old no.34 is the safe retrieval form while Pass-82 /13 is retained only as an unresolved source-specific sub-item/citation form. Added WCT-DIG-0437 and ADA-183 for the 1878 Bodleian Calendar entry Ch.339, which names John Tymperley junior, escheator of Norfolk and Suffolk, as the officer assigned in 15 Edw IV to take Joan's inquisition and records the later 28 Jan 17 Edw IV writ to the sheriff of London/Middlesex to distrain him. Added WCT-DIG-0438 and ADA-184 as a procedural control from the modern CIPM editorial introduction: one joint Norfolk/Suffolk escheator writ can generate two county inquisitions and survival can be uneven. This gives a documentary explanation for pursuing a separate Norfolk return and a new named administrative search hook without recycling family profiles. Exact Norfolk manors/parcels remain unextracted; no Watlington/Shouldham/Shingham/Holme/Runcton holding is claimed from Joan's IPM.
Pass 84 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 84
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 440
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Strict-dedupe archival expansion: E152/E153/E136/E357 recovery routes + concrete Norfolk/Suffolk split-return asymmetry
Notes: No previously covered Colt/Parr/Trusbut/Tymperley biography was counted again. Added WCT-DIG-0439/0440 and ADA-185/186. Pass 84 expands the missing Joan-Norfolk return search beyond C140/E149: CIPM XXVI and TNA guidance identify E152 enrolments, residual E153 escheator files, and E136/E357 escheator accounts as additional recovery/reconstruction routes. A fully transcribed 1440 Norfolk/Suffolk IPM packet (C139/99/38) then provides a concrete control: one joint writ produced separate Suffolk and Norfolk inquisitions, while the reference table lists an E149 duplicate for the Suffolk return but none for the Norfolk return. Therefore a negative E149 Norfolk search must not be treated as proof that Joan had no Norfolk Chancery return. Existing Pass-82-derived Land Severance/Land Recovery references to Bodleian MS Ch Norfolk 340 were reconciled to the Pass-83 correction MS Ch Norfolk 339. Exact Joan Norfolk property names remain unrecovered.
Pass 85 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 85
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 443
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: Strict-dedupe exact-reference pass: C140/52/34 leading mapping + E501/15–18 Index Nominum + early Chancery inventories
Notes: No previously covered Colt/Parr/Trusbut/Tymperley biography was counted again. Added WCT-DIG-0441/0442/0443 and ADA-187; upgraded WCT-DIG-0426, WCT-DIG-0433, ADA-179 and ADA-184. CIPM XXV explicitly explains that the old Record Commission item number remains the final document number inside the modern numbered C-series file (example 16 Hen VI no.35 -> C139/86/35). VCH Roydon independently cites Joan as C140/52, no.34, so [Inference] C140/52/34 is now the leading exact modern item target. VCH Barking's /13 is retained as an unresolved source conflict; the actual Joan manuscript has not been opened. The same editorial introduction supplies a precise physical finding-aid route, Index Nominum E501/15–18, for E149/E152/E153 duplicates/related returns. Mapping the Medieval Countryside also identifies early Chancery inventories at Trinity College Oxford MSS61–62 (coverage terminating at 15 Edw IV, with crown-held property/tenure/heir summaries) and Bodleian Rawlinson B.231 (surviving IPMs, often counties). Exact Joan Norfolk property names remain unrecovered; no new person, present parcel, or theft/fraud finding is asserted.
Pass 86 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 86
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 447
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Closure pass: 1427 Trusbut fee -> 1451 will -> Jane heiress -> Thomas Colt; Joan no.34 Norfolk-return theory downgraded by Rye
Notes: Hard dedupe retained: no previously researched person counted as new. Added WCT-DIG-0444-0447 and ADA-188-190; upgraded WCT-DIG-0011, 0015, 0393, 0422, 0426, 0429, 0430 and 0433 plus Land Severance/Land Recovery closure rows. Walter Rye's 1892 collected index to NORFOLK inquisitions contains real 15 Edw IV entries no.33 and no.63 but exposes no exact no.34 and no Parr/Parre/Colt/Trusbut entry, so [Inference] Rogers' printed Norfolk assertion is no longer a safe premise for a hypothetical missing Joan return. More importantly, Parkin/Blomefield vol. VII supplies the direct medieval transmission route: Thomas Trussbut, son/heir of Laurence, by will dated 31 Dec 1451 gives Tittleshall/Holme and Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey-linked property to son John, Shouldham lands to William; the Shouldham descent then says William died s.p. and the manor passed to Jane, daughter/heir of elder brother John, who married Thomas Colt. Parkin cites Norwich Register Aleyn fol.163 and says John Colt had livery of Tittleshall in Holme in 1 Hen VII. Historic England independently states Colt's manor/Trussbutt's passed by marriage to Thomas Colt. Thus the medieval Trusbut->Colt bridge is closed at primary-derived level; the remaining manuscript-level check is Aleyn fol.163. Exact 5 Nov 1485 livery date remains secondary-only. Parkin's internal John-vs-William Shingham inconsistency is preserved.
Pass 87 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 87
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 449
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Post-closure source precision: Aleyn digital-film route + exact 1843 tithe owner/occupier workflow + CBTM map-extract correction
Notes: Hard dedupe retained: zero people counted as new. Added WCT-DIG-0448/0449 and ADA-191/192; upgraded WCT-DIG-0016, WCT-DIG-0109, WCT-DIG-0447 and ADA-190 plus the existing 1811/1843 Land Severance rows and core Land Recovery next-evidence fields. A recent manuscript-source study documents the NRO catalogue-row form 'NCC will register Aleyn 19' and identifies Aleyn-period FamilySearch DGS 008076270. Combined with Parkin's Thomas Trussbut citation 'Register Aleyn fol.163', [Inference] the leading digital/catalogue target is 'NCC will register Aleyn 163' within/browsed via DGS 008076270; no Thomas image number is invented. Norfolk County Council's official Historic Maps guidance now supplies the exact 1843 ownership route: every numbered tithe-map plot maps to an apportionment entry giving owner, occupier, field name, cultivation, acreage and valuation, but apportionments are not digitised and must be requested from NRO using parish + plot number. The official ncc_tithe ArcGIS service confirms digitised map coverage in EPSG:27700. Source-control correction: CBTM's HARE 5185 (1811-1818) and HARE 5186 (1851) catalogue metadata describe broad estate maps including Shouldham, but their downloadable 22535/22536 PDFs are Downham Market town-map extracts, not visual Shouldham/Colts maps; Historic England separately cites HARE 6832 for its 1811 Colts continuity. No previously known HARE 5466, ACC 2022/153, Lemmon, or parcel-continuity material was recounted as new. Exact 1843 Shouldham plot numbers and apportionment owners remain to be extracted; modern HMLR ownership remains unproved.
Pass 88 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 88
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 452
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: Parcel-closure pass: exact Colt's Hall tithe tile + Lemmon tenure control + physical survival of medieval HARE 2826 field-book maps
Notes: Hard dedupe retained: zero new people. Added WCT-DIG-0450/0451/0452 and ADA-193/194/195; upgraded WCT-DIG-0018, 0051, 0068, 0372 and 0449 plus the 1794-98 Land Severance row and core Land Recovery targets. From Historic England's Colt's Hall NGR TF6784408887 and Norfolk County Council's published ncc_tithe cache parameters, the exact 1:500 tile containing Colt's Hall is calculated as level 12 / row 61436 / column 85456 (bbox approx E567831.31–567899.04, N308858.88–308926.61). The image could not be visually fetched through the current web interface, so no 1843 plot number is invented. A separate Downham property reconstruction establishes that Charles Lemmon owned two substantial blocks of property there while living/farming at Shouldham by 1840; this proves White's 'farmer at Colts Hall' cannot be silently read as 'tenant', and the Shouldham tithe apportionment remains decisive. An official Norfolk Records Committee report independently confirms that the Shouldham field book 1440-1 physically survives at NRO and was conserved, incorporating diagrammatic maps of field strips; scholarship fixes the source as HARE 2826 fols.16v,34v. Exact private Act citation also added to the existing enclosure record: 34 Geo.3 c.85 Pr., royal assent 23 May 1794. No Colts-specific Batchelors/Appletons/Beerway name was recovered from the 1796 road notice. Present HMLR ownership remains unverified; no theft/fraud evidence found.
Pass 89 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 89
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 453
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: HARE-originals status check + tithe-access correction: no prior HARE 2495/6832/5370/5466 originals found; TNA IR29/IR30 online route added
Notes: Prior-chat/library review found references, catalogue metadata and secondary/public summaries for HARE 2495, HARE 6832, HARE 5370 and HARE 5466, but no actual uploaded/original scans of those four decisive HARE documents. Pass 88 itself still leaves HARE 5370 unread, HARE 5466's full Colts Farm schedule unread, and the actual Shouldham sections of HARE 6832/related estate mapping outstanding. Pass 89 adds WCT-DIG-0453 and ADA-196 from The National Archives' current Tithes guide and corrects WCT-DIG-0449/ADA-192: Norfolk's Historic Maps site does not digitise its apportionments, but TNA's commissioner-copy IR 29 apportionments and IR 30 tithe maps can be viewed online via TheGenealogist. IR 29 contains owner/occupier, plot size/use and rentcharge; IR 30 supplies the numbered map; IR 18 is the administrative file fallback. Exact Shouldham IR references and the actual Colts plot number remain unrecovered, so no owner/occupier is inferred. HARE 5466 catalogue metadata was rechecked only as a status control, not recounted as a new record. Zero new people; no present HMLR ownership or theft/fraud finding.
Pass 90 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 90
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 457
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Large Edwardian/WWII ownership block: King's Lynn IR127/8 plan run narrowed; Norfolk 1910 online-access correction; NRO P/DLV local route; Farm Survey digitisation updated
Notes: Hard dedupe retained: zero people counted as new and no previously logged HARE/MAF material recounted. Added WCT-DIG-0454–0457 and ADA-197–200, eight search variants, one new NRO P/DLV retrieval target and one Land Recovery Audit route; upgraded WCT-DIG-0361/ADA-104 and WCT-DIG-0343/ADA-086 plus the existing Valuation Office target/audit row. The strongest Edwardian advance is archival precision: an official TNA accession report identifies IR 127/8 pieces 450–458 as Finance Act 1910 record-sheet plans for the East Anglia Peterborough (King's Lynn) District. Those pieces are now a concrete first test for Norfolk LVII.7 and XLV.16, but are NOT assumed to contain Shouldham or exhaust the district. Current TheGenealogist Lloyd George coverage explicitly says Norfolk/Suffolk remain future East Anglia releases, correcting any impression that the 1910 Shouldham survey can already be searched there online. A second independent Norfolk-local path is now established: NRO currently teaches use of Duties on Land Values field/valuation books, and an exact local citation P/DLV/1/52 demonstrates the NRO shelfmark family; exact Shouldham P/DLV item is still missing. The 1941–43 MAF 32/MAF 73 route was not recounted, but current TNA guidance confirms full digitisation is underway to March 2027 and county publication is progressive; no exact Shouldham farm code surfaced in this pass. HARE 2495/6832/5370/5466 originals remain unread, exact 1843 owner/occupier remains unresolved, current HMLR proprietor/title remains unverified, and no theft/fraud evidence was found.
Pass 91 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 91
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 461
New rows this pass: 4
Research focus: Large pre-1843 ownership block: Clackclose Land Tax 1767–1832 + TNA IR23/IR22/IR24 routes + Lemmon farming continuity
Notes: Hard dedupe retained: no HARE 5466, Pearce mortgage, conservation statement, directory or previously logged Hare/Hoff material was recounted. Added WCT-DIG-0458–0461 and ADA-201–204, eight search variants, two retrieval targets and one Land Recovery Audit row. The strongest new route is the pre-1811 land-ownership bridge: TNA states IR 23 contains the nationwide 1798 Land Tax assessments listing most landowners and main tenants; Norfolk's specialist finding aid independently places the county Quarter Sessions assessments in NRO C/Scd 2 and states Clackclose coverage begins in 1767 within the 1767–1832 annual-bundle system. This supplies a longitudinal Shouldham proprietor/occupier test across the 1794 enclosure and immediately before HARE 6832's 1811 estate map. TNA's IR 22/IR 24 redemption route was also added because, where a 1798 holding was redeemed, certificates can give fuller property descriptions, tenants/leaseholders and occasionally plans. The exact Shouldham IR 23 item, exact Clackclose C/Scd 2 sub-reference, and any Hare/Shouldham redemption contract remain unidentified, so no owner or tenant is invented. A separate parish-register sequence now independently shows Charles Lemmon repeatedly styled farmer in Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe from 1822 through 1859, materially bracketing White 1845's direct Colts Hall occupation evidence but not proving Colts ownership. Exact 1843 tithe owner/occupier, 1910 owner, HARE originals and current HMLR ownership remain unresolved; no theft/fraud evidence found.
Pass 92 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 92
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 463
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: Concrete 1875 Colts result: same-period Hare/Allen landowner role split + Charles Lemmon farmer and directly at Colts Hall; HARE 5466 severance inference materially strengthened
Notes: This pass deliberately stopped counting generic record routes and added only two concrete non-duplicate findings. WCT-DIG-0462 records the 1875 Shouldham parish entry: Sir Thomas Hare is lord, Hare and Rev. Stephen Allen are the principal landowners, and Charles Lemmon is separately listed as farmer. WCT-DIG-0463 records the same directory's Norfolk Court Directory p.563, which directly states 'Lemmon Charles, Colts hall, Shouldham, Downham'. Bibliographic control identifies the Kelly/Post Office volume as the 1875 edition. These facts align almost exactly with HARE 5466's post-1874 Hare-estate schedules expressly naming 'Colts Farm in Shouldham'. [Inference] This is now the strongest public same-period evidence that Charles Lemmon operated/occupied Colts Hall/Farm while the physical farm remained in the Hare estate landholding/administrative sphere. It does not yet legally prove Hare's exact freehold parcel because the original HARE 5466 Colts schedule, 1843 apportionment and 1910 valuation remain unread. If the reported 1869 Watlington-Colts lordship transfer is independently confirmed, the 1875/HARE 5466 alignment becomes strong chronological evidence of physical-land/title separation. No current HMLR owner or theft/fraud finding.
Pass 93 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 93
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 466
New rows this pass: 3
Research focus: First parcel-specific severance-instrument candidate: Batchelors/Further Homestall village-hall fragment — 7 Jun 1930 trust deed + 2024 ownership/LR investigation + NRO PD 356/129
Notes: Pass 93 applies the user's exact test: for a surviving historic Colts parcel, identify the instrument by which it supposedly left the chain. Historic England already fixes the modern village hall on the eastern end of an approximately 87m x 25m enclosure within the field corresponding to the greater part of the >9-acre Batchelors close, later Further Homestall and part of early-19C Colt's Farm. New WCT-DIG-0464 proves the Shouldham Village Hall Trust's governing instrument is a Declaration of Trust dated 7 Jun 1930; the current Charity Commission record unexpectedly states that the charity does not own and/or lease land/property. New WCT-DIG-0465 proves that in Mar 2024 Shouldham Parish Council explicitly discussed the background of the hall land ownership/lease and resolved to request the Trust Governance Deed and obtain the Land Registry record before considering sole-trustee status. New WCT-DIG-0466 identifies exact NRO source PD 356/129, cited in UEA scholarship for Shouldham village hall at TF 673 087. [Inference] The 1930 trust instrument is now the leading parcel-specific severance/tenure event for the eastern Batchelors fragment, but its full terms are unread: it may be an operative conveyance/gift/lease or only a governance instrument. No ownerless, unregistered, stolen or current-Colts ownership finding is made. Existing D/HH 8/2/86 and D/Ed manor-purchase material was rechecked and not recounted; a broader D/HH 8 East Anglia property container was added only as a retrieval target.
Pass 94 — 2026-09-02
Pass: 94
Date: 2026-09-02
Rows after pass: 466
New rows this pass: 0
Research focus: Loop-closure / prior-record recovery audit — stale 'missing' statuses corrected; authoritative Record Closure matrix added
Notes: No new Digital Record IDs were manufactured. Prior-chat/file recovery proved that several items repeatedly being treated as missing were already supplied and analysed: the full 12 Feb 1930 Humphreys->Edleston conveyance; the 1954 selected-manor assent; both distinct 21 Dec 1977 assents; and the 22 May 2017 probate grant. WCT-DIG-0310/0318/0319/0320 issue notes were corrected to CLOSED for those record-recovery purposes. Rights Integrated was corrected so the 1930 deed is no longer listed as a missing decisive document. A new Record Closure sheet now separates CLOSED primary records from genuine open gaps. The true physical-land bottlenecks are reduced to: actual 16 Dec 1929 predecessor deed; exact 1843 tithe plot/apportionment entries; actual HARE 6832 map section; HARE 5370 Colts entry; full HARE 5466 Colts Farm schedule; Hare/Hoff exchange instruments/plans; Batchelors 7 Jun 1930 operative trust/title documents; current HMLR parcel titles; and NHER 2001 protection agreement. The 30 Oct 1969 assent is downgraded to non-blocking modern-chain cleanup. No theft, ownerless-land or current residual-Colts parcel finding is asserted.
Pass 95 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 95
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 467
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: Modern Colts Hall parcel targeting — exact 2025 planning/address lead; HMLR route tightened without inventing ownership
Notes: Hard dedupe retained: the Charity Commission 7 Jun 1930 Village Hall trust date and 2024 Parish Council Land Registry investigation were already WCT-DIG-0464/0465 and were not recounted. New WCT-DIG-0467 records a 20 Nov 2025 planning index entry for conservation-area lime-tree works at Colts Hall, 21 The Green, Shouldham, PE33 0BY. This does not prove ownership, but it turns the Colts Hall core from a generic place-name into an exact current address-based planning/HMLR target. Because existing WCT-DIG-0362 records HMLR's guidance that planning Certificate A/B material can assist owner tracing, the next public-record test is now the full Borough Council application file: identify application reference/applicant and inspect any ownership certificate or owner notice, then use the exact address for HMLR title/index-map work. No current proprietor/title number, ownerless parcel, theft/fraud, or present residual-Colts ownership is asserted.
Pass 96 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 96
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 468
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: SUPERSEDED BY PASS 98 — erroneous planning-row alignment correction (historical audit trail retained)
Notes: SUPERSEDED BY PASS 98. Pass 96 incorrectly aligned the King George Playing Field row (2/TPO/00673 / T6 Grey Poplar) with Colts Hall. The live planning page shows Colts Hall, 21 The Green as the separate 20 Nov 2025 TREES IN A CONSERVATION AREA entry for T1/T2 lime-tree pollarding. WCT-DIG-0468, the official Eastgate Street/IDox address control, remains valid. See Pass 98 for the corrected current route.
Pass 97 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 97
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 470
New rows this pass: 2
Research focus: 1929 predecessor-deed party capacity control — J.H.T. Green independently confirmed as Weatherall & Green property professional
Notes: Hard dedupe retained. New WCT-DIG-0469 uses the official London Gazette of 17 Jul 1906: James Henry Townsend Green, of Weatherall and Green, was the person appointed by Mr Justice Swinfen Eady to conduct a High Court Chancery estate sale. New WCT-DIG-0470 uses the 1910 Post Office London Commercial Directory, which independently names the exact James Henry Townsend Green as auctioneer, surveyor and brewery valuer, with cross-reference to Weatherall & Green. These records do not recover the Watlington deed and do not prove beneficial ownership. They materially strengthen the capacity-control: the 1930 deed already describes Green of 22 Chancery Lane as land agent/surveyor, so the missing 16 Dec 1929 conveyance must be read for Green's stated legal capacity, the Public Trustee's capacity, root-of-title recitals, consideration, schedule/plan and reservations before assigning ownership. Actual 16 Dec 1929 deed remains CRITICAL; no current proprietor/title, ownerless parcel, theft/fraud or residual-Colts ownership finding is asserted.
Pass 98 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 98
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 470
New rows this pass: 0
Research focus: Data-integrity correction + hard-dedupe freeze — restore correct Colts Hall planning row; park exhausted HARE public research; tighten 1929 predecessor status
Notes: No new Digital Record IDs were manufactured. Pass 98 corrects the Pass 96 planning-row parsing error throughout the live workbook: 2/TPO/00673 / T6 Grey Poplar belongs to King George Playing Field, while Colts Hall, 21 The Green is the separate 20 Nov 2025 conservation-area application for T1/T2 lime-tree pollarding. The exact Colts Hall application reference/full file is not currently surfaced, so no applicant/ownership inference is made. HARE 5466 and HARE 6374/6375 + 6956 public/catalogue research is frozen as already exhausted; those questions now reopen only on receipt of original bundle images/transcripts, not by repeating web/catalogue searches. The 12 Feb 1930 Humphreys->Edleston conveyance remains CLOSED/PRIMARY. The 16 Dec 1929 Green + Public Trustee -> Humphreys item is restated more carefully as RECITAL RECOVERED; SEPARATE ORIGINAL NOT SURFACED IN CURRENT PROJECT SEARCH — this does not prove the user never supplied it in an earlier image/ZIP batch. Record count intentionally remains 470.
Pass 99 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 99
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 471
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: 1929 network lead + 1843 tithe / Colts Hall exact-reference hard-dedupe
Notes: Added one genuinely new contextual record only: WCT-DIG-0471, the British Newspaper Archive indexed Morning Post Wills and Bequests item of 31 Jul 1897, which names exact J.H.T. Green and an Edward Humphreys as separate legatees in the same reported will. This creates a specific identity/network test but does not prove that Edward is the 1913 Spooner/Coote solicitor or any Watlington connection. A 1914 Law Directory and 1893-94 property-history source identify an Edward Humphreys of Grover, Humphreys & Son, 4 King's Bench Walk, but that remains an unproved identity candidate and was not padded into a separate Digital Record. Targeted searches again failed to surface the exact Colts Hall 20 Nov 2025 planning application reference or the exact 1843 Shouldham tithe plot/owner/occupier/IR reference. HARE 5185/5186 and ACC 2022/153 were hard-deduped as prior work. The 16 Dec 1929 original remains CRITICAL; HARE 5466 and Hare/Hoff remain frozen archive-access dependencies.
Pass 100 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 100
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 472
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: Modern Shouldham parcel-control + 2023 geometry refinement + indexed-library/tithe-service validation
Notes: Added one new context-only record, WCT-DIG-0472 / ADA-213: official Borough Council committee record 2/TPO/00575 for two Lime trees on open land north of Lynn Road, south of 10 and east of Westgate Street, confirmed without modification. It is explicitly NOT a Colts ownership or boundary finding. Existing WCT-DIG-0365 was refined with the official 2023 Planning Committee identification of J Cribb as applicant for 23/00056/F at Land east of 52-60 Westgate Street; applicant status remains non-title evidence and exact 2002/2023 overlap is unproved. Existing WCT-DIG-0450 was current-checked against Norfolk County Council's live ncc_tithe MapServer, validating the cache parameters used for the exact tile calculation, but no 1843 plot number was read. Fresh indexed conversation+Library searches did not surface the separate 16 Dec 1929 original; this is only a current-index negative control and does not prove prior upload absence. The exact 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall Borough application reference remains unsurfaced; 2/TPO/00673 remains the separate King George Playing Field entry. HARE frozen items were not reopened.
Pass 101 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 101
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 473
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: Hard-dedupe continuation — modern Colts Hall administrative-property control; critical gaps rechecked without speculation
Notes: Added one new context-only record only: WCT-DIG-0473 / ADA-214. Two current public property-data indexes independently expose the exact postal property Colts Hall, 21 The Green, Shouldham, PE33 0BY; one places it in Council Tax Band F and the other lists an EPC rating G, potential E, score 15/100, property type house. These administrative/building facts do NOT prove freehold ownership, title number, parcel extent or historic Colts continuity. The 1843 tithe search again reached Historic England's Homestall/Further Homestall description but no plot number/owner/occupier/IR reference; the validated NCC machine target remains unread. A title-only Library search again did not surface the underlying Batch-5/1929 conveyance artifact, which remains an unsurfaced-source issue rather than proof of absence. Exact legatee-cluster searching still did not identify the 1897 testatrix, and exact searches still did not expose the 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall Borough application reference. HARE frozen items were not reopened.
Pass 102 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 102
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 474
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: 1835 Charles Lemmon electoral control + hard-dedupe continuation on tithe / 2025 planning / 1929 deed
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0474 / ADA-215 only. A digitised/indexed 1835 poll book for the Western Division of Norfolk exposes the exact entry 'Lemmon Charles, Shouldham', independently fixing that name/place eight years before the 1843 tithe and between existing parish-register farmer evidence. The actual voting qualification/property line was not recovered, so elector status is not treated as freehold ownership and no Colts Hall/title inference is made. Exact 1843 tithe plot/owner/occupier/IR reference remains unresolved; the 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall Borough reference remains unsurfaced; no public copy of the 16 Dec 1929 Green + Public Trustee -> Humphreys deed surfaced; the 1897 testatrix remains unidentified. Frozen HARE public/catalogue loops were not reopened.
Pass 103 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 103
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 475
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: TREECA retrieval-route correction for the 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall tree file
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0475 / ADA-216 only. Official Borough material proves that Shouldham conservation-area tree notifications use the TREECA application class: 24/00135/TREECA at Bodgers Barn, 8 Lynn Road, Shouldham is recorded as a tree application with no objection. A current 1 Jun 2026 Planning Committee delegated-powers report expressly states that ordinary delegated lists exclude TPO and Works to Trees in a Conservation Area; the Tree Matters section treats conservation-area notifications as a separate six-week process. This explains why repeated ordinary delegated-list searching did not expose the 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall lime-pollarding file. The correct next route is direct TREECA/tree-notification planning-register retrieval by exact address/date/description. The exact Colts Hall 2025 reference remains unresolved and was not guessed. 1835 Lemmon qualification, 1843 tithe owner/occupier and 16 Dec 1929 predecessor deed remain open. HARE frozen loops were not reopened.
Pass 104 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 104
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 475
New rows this pass: 0
Research focus: Data-integrity correction — Lemmon wife/identity chronology + late-November TREECA sequence targeting
Notes: No new Digital Record ID was manufactured. Existing WCT-DIG-0451 and WCT-DIG-0461 were corrected after a closer cross-read: Discover Downham says the Downham-born Charles Lemmon's first wife was Mary Winearls (married at Shouldham in 1821) and Hannah Dean was his second wife, placing Charles + Hannah at Shouldham by 1840. The Shouldham baptism transcription securely supports an early farmer Charles + Mary stage, but later entries continue to name farmer Charles + Mary through the 1850s. That conflict is now explicitly quarantined: the entire 1822-1859 baptism run is not treated as proven one-household continuity, and Downham property ownership is not used as proof of the 1843 Colts freehold. Existing WCT-DIG-0475 was also refined: the separate 6 Nov 2025 Orchard House Shouldham notification is independently indexed as 25/00257/TREECA, while other Borough-area TREECA examples around 15-25 Nov narrow the correct search stream. The exact 20 Nov Colts Hall reference still was not surfaced and is not guessed. The 1843 tithe plot/owner/occupier and 1929 deed remain open. HARE frozen loops were not reopened.
Pass 105 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 105
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 476
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: Norfolk tithe series fixed — IR 29/23 apportionment ↔ IR 30/23 paired map; Shouldham final item still open
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0476 / ADA-217. Official National Archives Discovery records now prove the exact Norfolk tithe-reference architecture: apportionments use IR 29/23/[item] and corresponding maps use IR 30/23/[same item]. Hemblington (274) and Neatishead (389) independently demonstrate the paired same-item structure. This materially closes part of the 1843 retrieval gap: the project no longer needs to identify the county series, only Shouldham's final item number, after which the map and apportionment can be directly paired with the existing NCC tile L12/R61436/C85456. No Shouldham item number, plot number, owner, occupier, acreage or use is guessed. Exact 1835 Lemmon qualification, exact 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall TREECA reference, and 16 Dec 1929 predecessor deed remain open. Pass 104's Lemmon Mary/Hannah identity quarantine remains in force. Frozen HARE public/catalogue loops were not reopened.
Pass 106 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 106
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 477
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: Direct Shouldham tithe retrieval bypass — parish-only search can expose record, map and TNA item
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0477 / ADA-218. Pass 105 had fixed the Norfolk TNA architecture but left Shouldham's final IR 29/23 and IR 30/23 item number unresolved. Pass 106 verifies from current TheGenealogist guidance that tithe records can be searched by County and Parish alone with no personal name; each result can open the transcript, original apportionment image and parish map, and the map controls expose the piece/sub-piece stated to match the TNA Discovery reference. TNA independently instructs parish searching, and Forebears' live Shouldham page specifically surfaces Tithe Apportionments under Shouldham land/property records. This changes the workflow materially: the final TNA item number no longer has to be discovered first through public indexing; it can be captured from the returned Shouldham tithe result. The actual Colts/Homestall result is still unread, so no plot number, owner, occupier, acreage or cultivation is asserted. No new 1835 poll qualification, 2025 Colts Hall TREECA number or 1929 predecessor deed surfaced. Frozen HARE loops were not reopened.
Pass 107 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 107
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 478
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: 1794 enclosure quantified — Shouldham + Garboiesthorpe 5,570-acre landscape control; tithe-image route pushed without false plot claims
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0478 / ADA-219 only. A directly searchable historical enclosure table in Cooke's Norfolk topographical text records 'Shouldham and Garboiesthorpe | 1794 | 5570' under place/year/acres, with the surrounding text attributing the list to Arthur Young. This is a useful quantified landscape-scale control immediately before HARE 6832 (1811) and the 1843 tithe, but is explicitly NOT Colts Farm acreage, Hare-estate acreage, or an allotment/proprietor schedule. The existing 1794-1798 Land Severance Timeline row was refined rather than duplicated. Pass 107 also re-confirmed the official catalogue-only 26 Nov 1611 Rich/Frances -> William Battes deed (HARE 3083/2) but did not count it because earlier project policy explicitly excluded that deed pending a substantive digital copy/transcription. Norfolk's ncc_tithe ArcGIS Export Map operation was pushed as a direct image route, but no actual returned 1843 image was successfully read in the current tool path, so no plot number was invented. Exact 1843 owner/occupier, exact 2025 Colts Hall TREECA reference and the 16 Dec 1929 predecessor deed remain open. Frozen HARE loops were not reopened.
Pass 108 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 108
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 479
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: Direct 1798 Shouldham owner/occupier database route verified — digitised TNA IR 23 before HARE 6832
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0479 / ADA-220. Pass 91 had already established TNA IR 23 as the correct national 1798 Land Tax route, but the exact Shouldham item and actual proprietor/occupier rows remained unread. Pass 108 verifies that Ancestry's 'UK, Land Tax Redemption, 1798' database is imaged directly from TNA IR 23 and lists owners and occupants, while Forebears' live Shouldham page independently indexes Land Tax Redemption (1798-1811) specifically under Shouldham taxation/land-property records. This materially removes another archive-number bottleneck: the 1798 Shouldham owner/occupier test can be searched directly online and used as a predecessor control immediately after the 1794 enclosure and before HARE 6832 (1811). No Hare/Lemmon owner or tenant is inferred because the actual Shouldham rows were not opened/read in this pass. The 1843 tithe owner/occupier, exact 2025 Colts Hall TREECA number and 16 Dec 1929 predecessor deed remain open. A modern address 'Trussbut Lodge, 22 The Green' surfaced next to Colts Hall but is held as a context-only lead pending evidence for the origin/date of the name.
Pass 109 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 109
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 479
New rows this pass: 0
Research focus: Main-cumulative dedupe correction — Notes & Queries 1867→1857; prior Dashwood/Stow-Hare provenance integrated
Notes: Zero new Digital Records. A conversation+Library dedupe sweep confirmed that several recent access routes and leads had already been worked in earlier cumulative or specialist files, including Goldsmiths'-Kress 17267.1/Reel 1619, the basic IR 23/IR 29/IR 30 routes, the 1911 Shouldham 30-acre/16-acre Small Holdings case, the 1985 Pearce 10-acre 'near the hall' mortgage, the Chicago Bacon/Butts collection, John Trussbut PROB 11/3, and the George Henry Dashwood/Stow-Hare muniment provenance. The main workbook itself contained a substantive stale error: WCT-DIG-0058 and dependent Butts rows called the Notes & Queries article '1867 / 3rd Series'. Pass 109 corrects this to Notes & Queries, 2nd Series vol. III, no.56, 24 Jan 1857. The article is signed G.H.D. and the volume index records 'D. (G. H.) on the Butts family, 74.' Prior Court Rolls Pass 10/11 had already identified Rev. George Henry Dashwood as the strong G.H.D. candidate and redirected the provenance from an unexplained generic private collection to the Stow Hall / Hare muniment context. That earlier result is now integrated into the main cumulative record but not recounted. Exact item-level matching of the cited deeds/court rolls to present HARE references remains open.
Pass 110 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 110
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 479
New rows this pass: 0
Research focus: Handover closure — Watlington-with-West Dereham film route deduped; NRO shelfmark still unresolved; Hare dispersal qualification integrated
Notes: Zero new Digital Records. The user correctly required a cumulative handover for the in-progress custody/shelfmark investigation. Pass 110 first dedupes the Watlington-with-West Dereham route: FamilySearch catalog 438436 and FHL films 1472612 item 10 + 1702188 item 14 were already solved in Pass 66/67 and are already present in WCT-DIG-0392 / ADA-142, so they are not recounted. A fresh public-index search still did not expose the modern Norfolk Record Office shelfmark or the opening 1540 roll. Pass 110 also integrates the specialist Court Rolls custody work into WCT-DIG-0341: British Library Add MS 46411 is already-proved Stow Hall/Hare dispersal evidence (former pressmark 13 E.1; 'Deed Room Stow Bardolph'; Dashwood exhibited it in 1861; sold by Mrs Charles Howard in 1947). A newly verified supporting custody detail, BL Add Ch 74436, also belonged to Sir Thomas Hare, 2nd Bt., and was presented by Mrs Charles Howard in 1947, but it is a Ramsey Abbey charter and is not counted as a Watlington record. Current conclusion: the main Hare archive is at NRO, but the Stow corpus was partly dispersed; exact Dashwood 1857 court-roll notices still require item-level matching to modern HARE or dispersed shelfmarks.
Pass 111 — 2026-09-03
Pass: 111
Date: 2026-09-03
Rows after pass: 480
New rows this pass: 1
Research focus: New West Dereham 1540-1793 extract-source route — opening-year target separated from known court-roll series
Notes: Added WCT-DIG-0480 only. Pass 111 first hard-dedupes the TNA 2002 accession 'West Dereham manor court: minutes 1792-1856 (ACC 2002/145)': that fact was already present in the Pass 65 workbook log and is not new progress. A genuinely absent FamilySearch-derived West Dereham source listing then surfaced: 'Extracts from manor court rolls and parish registers, 1540-1793'. It is listed separately from 'Manor of Watlington-with-West Dereham. Court (Norfolk) — Manorial court rolls, 1540-1566, 1786-1909'. The exact 1540 start makes the extracts source a new high-value route to the unresolved opening-year identity test, but no identity between the two sources is asserted. The exact FamilySearch catalogue ID, FHL film number, author/compiler, manuscript source and first 1540 extract remain unsurfaced. A separate WeRelate source 'Extracts from manor court rolls and parish registers, 1297-1782' (FHL 890188 item 6) was found only as a similar GSU source-control example and is explicitly NOT merged with the West Dereham item. Modern NRO shelfmark for FamilySearch 438436, actual 1540 opening heading, actual 1542-43 Gawsells court, 1843 tithe owner/occupier, 1798 Land Tax rows, exact 2025 Colts Hall TREECA and 16 Dec 1929 deed remain open. Frozen HARE catalogue loops were not reopened.
Rights evidence & survival analysis (123)
Lordship / manorial title

Historic status: Historic lordship capable of separate existence. PASS 8 separation correction: contemporary directories positively identify Plestow (1845) and Coote (1883) as lords of Gawsells in Watlington; they do not independently prove a Colts title chain.

Current legal category: Incorporeal hereditament; separate from land/rights

Current stance: The lordship itself is accepted for project purposes. That acceptance proves no land, mineral, sporting, market, fishery, fold, rent or other substantive incident.

Evidence: Historic title chain; HMLR PG22 framework

Notes: Do not convert the generic NRO Watlington Manor authority record or the Gawsells directory entries into a Colts conveyance. Absence of the word Colts in a directory is not proof that the same person owned no second manor. Search the operative Colt assurance under George Colt/Colte/Coult of Cavendish, esquire, son/heir of Henry Colt; do not assume 'Sir George Colt, son of George'. PASS 10 requires the early Baynard/Shouldham estate to be bridged into the later Trussbutts/Colts stream before its Domesday resources are attributed to the manor. PASS 12: this dual-fee structure is a core identity-control rule for the whole rights reconstruction. PASS 22: do not convert generic "manor and estate of Shouldham" in a scholarly note into proved Colts/Priory identity before reading the deed. PASS 24 spelling control: the scholarly HARE 2723 note names Sir William MARSHAM, not Masham.

Manorial land / Colts Farm / capital messuage

Historic status: Physical estate historically identifiable

Current legal category: Corporeal land, not automatically a manorial right

Current stance: Historic Colts land is proved as an estate identity; present ownership of any parcel is not proved by ownership of the lordship.

Evidence: HARE 2495; HARE 5466 and other estate evidence

Notes: A person can own parish land, a hall and one named manor without that evidence proving title to every other local manor. Inspect all of HARE 2826, not merely mapped fols 16v/34v: scholarship says the maps cover only a tiny part of the written draft survey. Overlay the 1828 Plestow Wiggenhall boundary with 1597 extended Colts parcels, Fitton 1808 claims, drainage land, tithe and land-tax maps.

16 shillings rent

Historic status: Direct 1506 rent remains proved. Earlier generic Watlyngton rent/court records may expose its origin or structure, but their contents and exact Colts identity are unread.

Current legal category: Exact type unresolved

Current stance: No present enforceable Colts rent is proved.

Evidence: 1506 CP 25/1/170/197 no.106; HARE 4058 (1411-1412) and F(M) roll 160 (1452-1453) are newly identified earlier rent/court tests, not yet matched to the 1506 rent

Notes: Do not call the rent extinguished until its type and chain are established; do not treat any generic Watlington rent account as Colts without internal identification. PASS 11: HARE 2826 may provide earlier survey/rent context, but no rent text has been read from the original. Do not equate Parlettes with the 1506 rent without an instrument or parcel/title bridge. PASS 21: no later continuation or legal character of the 1506 16s rent recovered.

One free fold

Historic status: Historic fold/fold-liberty case materially strengthened: 1506 direct Watlyngton free fold plus 1597 bundled-title fold liberty. Exact exclusivity to Colts still requires original deed allocation.

Current legal category: Historic fold/foldcourse custom or proprietary interest; not one of the narrow Schedule-12 manorial-right categories expressly listed by HMLR PG66. Any modern survival requires proof of a separate proprietary/easement/profit/land route.

Current stance: The historic right is proved; survival of the same right is not. No substitute Colts allotment or modern property right has been identified.

Evidence: 1506 CP25/1/170/197 no.106 records one free fold in Watlyngton; PASS 13 adds HARE 2403 (20 Oct 1597), a title exemplification for a package expressly including Watlyngton/Watlyngton Coltes and a liberty of a fold in Watlyngton and other places.

Notes: The custumal is the right document type to explain fold obligations, but its title is uncertain and top illegible. BL/MA 34 must be treated as a Gawsells/Tottenhill comparator unless Colts is expressly named. Do not infer a fold from field-strip mapping alone. PASS 20: continue to search for substituted allotment/property rather than assuming the ancient fold survives unchanged. PASS 21: no survival rescue. The new Buttes/Gawsells/Russells chain is a separate manor stream and must not be used to supplement the Colts fold evidence. Enclosure award/substitute allotment remains decisive. PASS 23 found no Norfolk 1749 full award/map; same-right survival remains unproved and substitute allotment/property remains the relevant route. PASS 25 territorial correction: after enclosure, search substitute allotments by parcel/estate succession through the Plestow/Hare split, not only by manor label.

Advowson of St Peter / Watlington patronage

Historic status: Directly appurtenant in 1506; later patronage separately identifiable

Current legal category: Separate ecclesiastical patronage right governed by church-law registration/transfer regime; not a saleable modern manorial appurtenance.

Current stance: It is not a current incident passing on a sale of the Colts lordship.

Evidence: 1506 CP 25/1/170/197 no.106

Notes: Strongest resolved modern legal effect. The c.1930 inventory is catalogue-only and unread. PASS 9 narrows a nineteenth-century severance/transfer window: Plestow patron in 1845; Barker patron by 1870-72; Coote lord of Gawsells while Barker patron in 1883. PASS 11 found no new Pynkeney/Elizabeth or Henry Wyatt document bridging the 1506 advowson into the Colts stream. PASS 12: superior Wormegay held generic advowsons in 1441, but this does not bridge the specific 1506 St Peter advowson into Colts.

Court baron / customary court

Historic status: A five-record Watlington court/custom/rent sequence is now identified across two archives. Every item remains identity-unresolved for Colts because the MDR uses an undifferentiated Watlington Manor creator name.

Current legal category: Historic jurisdiction/evidentiary institution; copyhold abolition ended the last meaningful land-tenure function of manorial courts.

Current stance: No present exercisable feudal or customary jurisdiction is proved.

Evidence: Official MDR Watlington series: HARE 4056 custumal (14th c.); HARE 4058 rent account (1411-1412); F(M) roll 160 court roll (1452-1453); HARE 2454 court book (1554-1558); BL/MA 34 draft court book (1746-1767)

Notes: HMLR requires custom of the particular manor. Generic creator metadata cannot merge multiple Watlington streams. PASS 10 rejected a tempting 1381-1930 court-roll series on the sale catalogue because page-boundary checking showed it belongs to Wivenhoe, not Watlington Colts. Do not import customs from 'Dersingham Shouldham' merely because the record title contains Shouldham. PASS 26: 1721 parallel Watlington proprietors materially increase the need to identify each BL/MA 34 / BL/CS 4/57 court heading and lord, rather than retrospectively assigning generic Watlington to Gawsells or Colts.

Heriots / customary fines / reliefs / fealty / suit / copyhold admissions

Historic status: Exact local incidents are now testable across a dated Watlington record set, but none may be assumed merely because such incidents were typical of manorial courts.

Current legal category: Extinguished/compensated manorial incidents if they existed

Current stance: Historic only; no current Colts privilege or charge.

Evidence: Potential evidence in HARE 4056, F(M) roll 160, HARE 2454 and BL/MA 34; no incident yet transcribed or identified as Colts

Notes: BL/MA 34 may demonstrate Gawsells/Davis/Plestow court practice and must not be imported into Colts without an express joining instrument. PASS 11: WAL 1058 / PD 603/197 are preserved only as a separate Dersingham Shouldham comparator; no incident from them is attributed to Colts.

Mines / minerals

Historic status: Possible historic manorial category

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance: No Colts-specific mineral title, reservation, burdened parcel, present benefit chain or priority position is proved.

Evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet

Notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority. PASS 20: broad web searching is no longer the efficient route; use HARE 5466, enclosure parcel mapping, former copyholder names and MAF/enfranchisement files. PASS 21: no direct Colts mineral reservation found. Incremental early-17th-century estate assembly reinforces the need for parcel/manor-specific provenance before using wider Hare mineral evidence. PASS 22 HARE 2723 becomes a new 1632 instrument to test for minerals/reservations, but no mineral clause is yet known. Use as an exclusion/control example: local subsurface exploitation must be tied to exact parcels/title before being treated as Colts evidence. PASS 24: HARE 5466's newly exposed tenancy-agreement character makes the full 1871/post-1874 bundle an even higher-value place to inspect for landlord mineral/quarry/entry reservations across named estate units, including Colts Farm.

Limestone / lime / clay / stone / gravel

Historic status: Possible manorial category

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance: No present Colts ownership or right to work these substances is proved.

Evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet

Notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority. PASS 20: broad web searching is no longer the efficient route; use HARE 5466, enclosure parcel mapping, former copyholder names and MAF/enfranchisement files. PASS 24: HARE 5466's newly exposed tenancy-agreement character makes the full 1871/post-1874 bundle an even higher-value place to inspect for landlord mineral/quarry/entry reservations across named estate units, including Colts Farm.

Pits / quarries

Historic status: Possible manorial category

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance: No present Colts pit or quarry right is proved.

Evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet

Notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority. PASS 20: broad web searching is no longer the efficient route; use HARE 5466, enclosure parcel mapping, former copyholder names and MAF/enfranchisement files. PASS 24: HARE 5466's newly exposed tenancy-agreement character makes the full 1871/post-1874 bundle an even higher-value place to inspect for landlord mineral/quarry/entry reservations across named estate units, including Colts Farm.

Mineral entry / search / working rights

Historic status: Possible ancillary rights

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival if underlying mineral right/custom survives

Current stance: Neither the underlying Colts mineral right nor associated entry/search/working powers are proved.

Evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet

Notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority. PASS 20: broad web searching is no longer the efficient route; use HARE 5466, enclosure parcel mapping, former copyholder names and MAF/enfranchisement files. Use as an exclusion/control example: local subsurface exploitation must be tied to exact parcels/title before being treated as Colts evidence. PASS 24: HARE 5466's newly exposed tenancy-agreement character makes the full 1871/post-1874 bundle an even higher-value place to inspect for landlord mineral/quarry/entry reservations across named estate units, including Colts Farm.

Sporting / hunting / shooting / fowling

Historic status: Post-1926 substantive estate sporting right positively evidenced

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance: A sporting right survives somewhere in the wider estate evidence, but present Colts ownership is not proved and must not be claimed.

Evidence: Official Forestry England plan: 1943 Hare Estate 999-year lease context, sporting rights retained and exercised in Shouldham Sincks PASS 24: Norfolk Chronicle 9 Nov 1782 transcription records game on several manors belonging to Mrs Moore and Lady Harris in parishes including Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe, with sporting requiring leave and trespassers threatened with prosecution.

Notes: The exchange catalogue and MDR records are evidentiary routes, not proof of a sporting reservation or Colts title connection. Current leasehold classification is structural corroboration only; it is not proof that the 1943 sporting reservation is unchanged or appurtenant to Colts. Do not equate Stow Estates' landownership with sporting-right ownership. Do not treat permission/activity records as proof of proprietary sporting-right title. PASS 21: no Colts-specific sporting clause found. Incremental Hare assembly by 1628 increases the need to prove which acquired manor/parcel generated the later estate sporting reservation. PASS 22 HARE 2723 should be tested for game/sporting reservation, but no such clause is yet evidenced. This strengthens the 1943 operational chronology only; it does not replace the missing Hare -> Forestry lease or prove Colts origin of retained sporting rights.

Warren / chase

Historic status: Free warren is historically verified in Watlington at the superior Bardolf/Wormegay level; no Trussbut/Colts subgrant or descent is yet proved.

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance: Warren survival is strongly evidenced outside the specific Colts title; a present Colts warren/chase right is not proved.

Evidence: PASS 12 upgrade: calendar-derived 19 July 1254 royal charter grants William Bardolf and heirs free warren in demesne lands expressly including Watlington; 1441 Phelipp IPM also records warrens in the superior Wormegay franchise bundle.

Notes: Do not confuse a land-name warren with a franchise. Use only internally identified Colts/Watlyngton entries; generic creator metadata is insufficient. PASS 11 did not recover the underlying 1634 Shouldham Warren lease reference or text. PASS 14: modern Stow shooting-estate evidence strengthens continuity of a wider sporting/warren landscape but is not a Colts title bridge. PASS 20 de-duplication: HARE 6956/1-5 and HARE 6374-75 were re-confirmed but were already earlier-pass discoveries, not new evidence. PASS 22 found no new Colts-warren bridge; HARE 2723 must be inspected for any warren/game clause but none is present in the recovered scholarly description.

Piscary / fishing

Historic status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham fishery resource proved; historic Watlington-Colts piscary not proved

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance: The legal class can survive, but no current Colts piscary is proved.

Evidence: PASS 10 correction: fishery is directly recorded in Ralph Baynard's separate Shouldham Domesday entry; the 2025 catalogue's attribution of it to a £2 'Watlington Colts' manor is not supported as one Domesday entry.

Notes: Do not cite the 2025 catalogue's combined £2 + fishery wording as direct Colts evidence.

Watlington market franchise

Historic status: Historic Watlington market evidenced

Current legal category: Potential relating franchise

Current stance: No Crown grant, prescription, Colts attribution, devolution or present exercisability is proved.

Evidence: Gazetteer: prescriptive market noted 1252

Notes: Not a proved 1252 charter grant. A generic Watlington court reference could show local exercise but would not itself prove ownership by Colts or present survival. PASS 21 adds an exclusion lesson from the Priory: VCH records a 1248 Henry III market/fair grant to the Prior of Shouldham located at Stoke Ferry. Institutional holder name therefore cannot be used to infer franchise locality. No analogous Colts market grant is proved.

Shouldham market / fairs

Historic status: Historic separate Shouldham stream

Current legal category: Potential franchise

Current stance: It is not a proved Colts franchise.

Evidence: Prescriptive market by 1334 + later fairs

Tolls / stallage

Historic status: Historic separate manor rights lead

Current legal category: Separate stream

Current stance: No present Colts toll or stallage right is proved.

Evidence: HARE 2719 abstract, 1587, Shouldham Priory manor

Notes: Common Gawdy/Rich/Hare ownership is insufficient to merge rights.

Two fold liberties

Historic status: Historic separate Shouldham Priory-manor rights

Current legal category: Separate stream

Current stance: They must not be treated as Colts rights.

Evidence: HARE 2719 abstract, 1587

Notes: Remain distinct from the ONE FREE FOLD expressly conveyed with Watlyngton in 1506. PASS 23 found no Norfolk 1749 full award/map; same-right survival remains unproved and substitute allotment/property remains the relevant route. PASS 25 territorial correction: after enclosure, search substitute allotments by parcel/estate succession through the Plestow/Hare split, not only by manor label.

Commons / wastes / common rights

Historic status: Historic commons/waste definitively subject to enclosure legislation

Current legal category: Post-enclosure land/right outcome depends on award

Current stance: No old common right is proved to remain with the lordship; no substitute Colts allotment has been identified.

Evidence: 1749 Watlington Inclosure Act; surviving award extract NRO MS 7245, 7B4 (Elizabeth Roberts allotment)

Notes: Do not say the full award has been found and do not transfer an enclosure-era Gawsells court outcome to Colts without the operative award or an express consolidation. PASS 21: no new Colts allotment found. Continue searching for substituted land/property under 1749/1794-98 enclosure rather than assuming old common rights survived unchanged. PASS 23 found no Norfolk 1749 full award/map; same-right survival remains unproved and substitute allotment/property remains the relevant route. PASS 25 territorial correction: after enclosure, search substitute allotments by parcel/estate succession through the Plestow/Hare split, not only by manor label.

Roads / ways / dykes / drains / protective works

Historic status: Potential historic rights/liabilities

Current legal category: Legally capable in certain forms

Current stance: No Colts-specific surviving benefit, liability, custom or affected parcel is proved.

Evidence: Enclosure regimes + Schedule 12 legal category PASS 23 enclosure-transcription additions: Rogers Corner, Fedderston Green, Galow Lane/Woodfield, and an expressly described road from Shouldham to Watlington.

Notes: Fenland geography and record type justify investigation but are not evidence of a right, liability or Colts ownership. Map the new 1796 route/place names against the full enclosure award/map, HARE 2495, HARE 6832, tithe parcels and later estate plans. PASS 24: NRO HARE 5185 231x2 is now a precise 1818 post-enclosure whole-estate map target for roads, water, land-use and ownership colours in Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe. PASS 25: de-combination means road/drain obligations or benefits should be mapped against the land retained/sold at 1779-82 and 1869, especially using HARE 5185 and sale particulars.

Timber

Historic status: Historic estate category possible

Current legal category: No automatic manorial title right

Current stance: No Colts-specific manorial timber right or reservation is proved.

Evidence: 1798 Shouldham timber licence is separate; no direct Colts timber reservation

Notes: PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence. PASS 26: because Forestry territory expanded after 1943, any timber reservation must be tied to specific lease/addition plans rather than the later forest boundary as a whole.

Village green control

Historic status: Not inherent from lordship alone

Current legal category: Not automatic manorial right

Current stance: No present Colts right of control is proved.

Evidence: No direct evidence

Modern access / wayleaves in Shouldham woodland estate

Historic status: Modern estate/leasehold access and wayleave context, not established as medieval/manorial rights

Current legal category: Ordinary easement/licence/wayleave/land-management rights unless contrary title evidence proves a manorial origin

Current stance: Do not present them as Colts manorial rights.

Evidence: Forestry England Shouldham/Bilney Forest Plan; 2021 Shouldham Sincks access notice

Notes: Included to prevent modern estate access arrangements being accidentally described as surviving manorial privileges.

Mill / milling interest

Historic status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham economic resource proved; no direct Watlington-Colts mill right proved

Current legal category: A mill may be ordinary land/property or carry associated easements/profits; Domesday presence alone does not create a present manorial franchise.

Current stance: No current Colts milling right is proved.

Evidence: Ralph Baynard's Shouldham [All Saints and St Margaret]/other Shouldham Domesday entry: 0.8 mills

Notes: The 2025 catalogue's Domesday wording is insufficient. Distinguish physical mill property from any customary milling incident. PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence.

Salthouse / salt-working profit

Historic status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham economic resource proved; not mentioned in the 2025 Watlington-Colts catalogue paragraph

Current legal category: Historic land/economic resource; no automatic surviving manorial privilege follows from Domesday description

Current stance: No Colts salt-working profit is proved.

Evidence: Ralph Baynard's Shouldham Domesday entry records 1 salthouse

Notes: Recorded to preserve a potentially relevant historic profit without silently importing it into the Colts rights bundle. PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence.

Castleward / castle-guard rent

Historic status: VERIFIED historic feudal burden on specified Watlington/Wormegay knight's-fee holdings; exact later Trussbut/Colts predecessor not identified.

Current legal category: Historic charge tied to medieval knight-service tenure; Tenures Abolition Act 1660 is the relevant abolition/conversion framework.

Current stance: No current Colts liability is established.

Evidence: 1329 Thomas Bardolf IPM/calendar material: Wormegay foreign tenants paid 2s 2d per full knight's fee at the end of every 24 weeks, called Castelwarde; multiple Watlington fee holdings expressly rendered it.

Notes: Do not turn a superior feudal burden into a present manorial privilege.

Waytefee / watch-fee

Historic status: VERIFIED historic feudal burden on specified Watlington/Wormegay knight's-fee holdings; exact later Trussbut/Colts predecessor not identified.

Current legal category: Historic charge tied to medieval knight-service tenure; Tenures Abolition Act 1660 is the relevant abolition/conversion framework.

Current stance: No current Colts liability is established.

Evidence: 1329 Thomas Bardolf IPM/calendar material: Wormegay foreign tenants rendered 12d yearly per full knight's fee, called Waytefee; multiple Watlington fee holdings expressly rendered it.

Notes: Track as a historic burden, not as a modern beneficial right.

Superior honour franchises — waifs / strays / soc / toll / team / infangthief

Historic status: VERIFIED at superior Wormegay honour level; not verified as franchises of the subordinate Trussbut/Colts manor.

Current legal category: Historic honour/franchise categories; no present Colts entitlement is evidenced by the superior grant alone.

Current stance: No present Colts claim is proved; superior-honour wording must not be imported into Colts.

Evidence: 1441 William Phelipp IPM, E-CIPM 25-481: honour/manor of Wormegay held with escheats, waifs, strays, soc, toll, team (thema), infangthief and other franchises.

Notes: Grouped here to preserve the full 1441 franchise lead without inflating the Colts rights bundle.

Law of Property Act 1922 — framework

Historic status: 1922; reform operative 1 Jan 1926 · Generic lord of manor / rights-holder

Current legal category: Mines/minerals and working/access rights; fairs/markets; chase/warren; piscary; hunting/shooting/fishing/fowling/game; tenant common rights; certain maintenance liabilities

Current stance:

Evidence: Copyhold was enfranchised and residual manorial incidents were subject to statutory extinguishment/compensation.

Notes: Manor / Record: Law of Property Act 1922 — framework
Date / Period: 1922; reform operative 1 Jan 1926
Lord / Rights Holder: Generic lord of manor / rights-holder
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Former copyholder / freehold owner
What the Public Record Proves: Copyhold was enfranchised and residual manorial incidents were subject to statutory extinguishment/compensation.
Compensation / Amount: By agreement/award; schedules set valuation methods
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Quit/chief/free rents; fines; reliefs; heriots; dues incl. steward fees; certain forfeitures; timber rights; other copyhold incidents
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Mines/minerals and working/access rights; fairs/markets; chase/warren; piscary; hunting/shooting/fishing/fowling/game; tenant common rights; certain maintenance liabilities
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Framework only — not manor-specific
Evidence Status: Official statute
Direct Source URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1922/16/pdfs/ukpga_19220016_en.pdf
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Use each compensation agreement to identify which statutory incidents actually applied; check whether any preserved rights were expressly added to the agreement.

Five Norfolk manors bought for £75 — D/HH 8/2/39

Historic status: 6 Jan 1925 · R.H. Edleston & Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston after purchase

Current legal category: Unknown; minerals/sporting/franchise rights would require express evidence

Current stance:

Evidence: Conveyance of Lynford/Linford, East Hall Mundford, West Hall Mundford, Cranwick and West Tofts for £75.

Notes: Manor / Record: Five Norfolk manors bought for £75 — D/HH 8/2/39
Date / Period: 6 Jan 1925
Lord / Rights Holder: R.H. Edleston & Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston after purchase
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Vendor Henry William Game
What the Public Record Proves: Conveyance of Lynford/Linford, East Hall Mundford, West Hall Mundford, Cranwick and West Tofts for £75.
Compensation / Amount: £75 PURCHASE PRICE — not compensation
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Unknown from public conveyance catalogue; later files may show rents/fines/heriots/etc.
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Unknown; minerals/sporting/franchise rights would require express evidence
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: No — rights bundle not itemised publicly
Evidence Status: Primary deed survives; catalogue only
Direct Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Request D/HH 8/2/39 plus D/HH 8/2/52–83; extract every right, rent, court incident, mineral/timber/sporting clause and later extinguishment.

Alconbury Weston — D/Ed 10/3/1–186

Historic status: 6 Mar 1924–Sep 1940 · R.H. Edleston

Current legal category: Preserved rights require express inclusion; public catalogue does not say

Current stance:

Evidence: 223-folio corpus mainly concerns extinguishment of manorial incidents.

Notes: Manor / Record: Alconbury Weston — D/Ed 10/3/1–186
Date / Period: 6 Mar 1924–Sep 1940
Lord / Rights Holder: R.H. Edleston
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Various former/customary tenants; solicitors/steward
What the Public Record Proves: 223-folio corpus mainly concerns extinguishment of manorial incidents.
Compensation / Amount: Amounts not exposed in public catalogue
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Potentially statutory incidents such as rents, fines, reliefs, heriots, dues, forfeitures, timber
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Preserved rights require express inclusion; public catalogue does not say
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: No — only generic 'manorial incidents' is public
Evidence Status: Large primary archive corpus; not digitised
Direct Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=N&ItemID=169656&ItemNum=100&Keyword=Congregational&PageNum=1&Variations=Y
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Request compensation agreements/awards/schedules first; capture incident type, affected holding, compensation, whether minerals/sporting rights included.

Chesterton — D/Ed 10/3/213–228 + D/HH 8/2/84–85

Historic status: 1927–1942 · R.H. Edleston / Edleston representatives

Current legal category: Preserved rights not proved extinguished

Current stance:

Evidence: 27 folios of extinguishment correspondence; separate schedule lists tenants whose incidents had been extinguished; 1942 letter covers Alder holding.

Notes: Manor / Record: Chesterton — D/Ed 10/3/213–228 + D/HH 8/2/84–85
Date / Period: 1927–1942
Lord / Rights Holder: R.H. Edleston / Edleston representatives
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Former tenants incl. D.R. Alder holding
What the Public Record Proves: 27 folios of extinguishment correspondence; separate schedule lists tenants whose incidents had been extinguished; 1942 letter covers Alder holding.
Compensation / Amount: Amounts not exposed in public catalogue
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Potentially rents, fines, reliefs, heriots, dues, forfeitures, timber
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Preserved rights not proved extinguished
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: No — specific incidents absent from public metadata
Evidence Status: Primary archive papers survive
Direct Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Request D/HH 8/2/84 schedule first, then D/Ed 10/3/213–228 and D/HH 8/2/85. Build tenant-by-tenant rights/compensation table.

Glatton with Holme — D/Ed 10/3/237–247

Historic status: 7 Jan 1930–16 Mar 1938 · R.H. Edleston

Current legal category: Preserved rights not proved extinguished

Current stance:

Evidence: 15 folios specifically concern extinguishment of manorial incidents.

Notes: Manor / Record: Glatton with Holme — D/Ed 10/3/237–247
Date / Period: 7 Jan 1930–16 Mar 1938
Lord / Rights Holder: R.H. Edleston
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Various tenants; E.R. Hanby Holmes; Marshall Huntriss & Co.
What the Public Record Proves: 15 folios specifically concern extinguishment of manorial incidents.
Compensation / Amount: Amounts not exposed in public catalogue
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Potential statutory incident classes
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Preserved rights not proved extinguished
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: No
Evidence Status: Primary correspondence survives
Direct Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=N&ItemID=169656&ItemNum=100&Keyword=Congregational&PageNum=1&Variations=Y
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Request all 15 folios; identify every compensation agreement/holding/right and whether any Twelfth-Schedule rights were expressly included.

Eynesbury — D/Ed 10/3/248–264

Historic status: 21 Jan 1932–28 Oct 1940 · R.H. Edleston

Current legal category: Preserved rights not proved extinguished

Current stance:

Evidence: Correspondence chiefly concerns the manor, especially manorial extinguishments.

Notes: Manor / Record: Eynesbury — D/Ed 10/3/248–264
Date / Period: 21 Jan 1932–28 Oct 1940
Lord / Rights Holder: R.H. Edleston
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Various tenants; E.R. Hanby Holmes; Marshall Huntriss & Co.; E.N. Gent
What the Public Record Proves: Correspondence chiefly concerns the manor, especially manorial extinguishments.
Compensation / Amount: Amounts not exposed in public catalogue
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Potential statutory incident classes
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Preserved rights not proved extinguished
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: No
Evidence Status: Primary correspondence survives
Direct Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=N&ItemID=169656&ItemNum=100&Keyword=Congregational&PageNum=1&Variations=Y
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Request complete file; extract incident, compensation, land parcel and any rights expressly preserved/released.

Wakefield — D/Ed 10/3/275

Historic status: 27 Jun 1938 · Alice/Sarah Edleston involvement

Current legal category: Unknown

Current stance:

Evidence: One letter directly concerns extinguishment of manorial incidents in the Manor of Wakefield.

Notes: Manor / Record: Wakefield — D/Ed 10/3/275
Date / Period: 27 Jun 1938
Lord / Rights Holder: Alice/Sarah Edleston involvement
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Marshall, Huntriss & Co.
What the Public Record Proves: One letter directly concerns extinguishment of manorial incidents in the Manor of Wakefield.
Compensation / Amount: Not exposed
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Unknown until letter read
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Unknown
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: No
Evidence Status: Primary letter survives
Direct Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=N&ItemID=169656&ItemNum=100&Keyword=Congregational&PageNum=1&Variations=Y
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Request front/back scan; identify incident, capacity in which Alice acted, compensation and affected holding.

Eric R. Hanby Holmes — Cotherstone D/HH 4/1/536

Historic status: 28 Nov 1933 · Earl of Strathmore was Lord / compensation recipient

Current legal category: Not relevant without full agreement

Current stance:

Evidence: Agreement concerns extinguishment on West Thorngarth Hill and 43a.0r.28p. Compensation in the series was paid to the Earl of Strathmore as Lord.

Notes: Manor / Record: Eric R. Hanby Holmes — Cotherstone D/HH 4/1/536
Date / Period: 28 Nov 1933
Lord / Rights Holder: Earl of Strathmore was Lord / compensation recipient
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Eric Richard Hanby Holmes and another
What the Public Record Proves: Agreement concerns extinguishment on West Thorngarth Hill and 43a.0r.28p. Compensation in the series was paid to the Earl of Strathmore as Lord.
Compensation / Amount: £38 6s.8d.
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Specific incident type not exposed in catalogue
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Not relevant without full agreement
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: No — generic incidents only
Evidence Status: Item-level public catalogue; typescript survives
Direct Source URL: https://www.thestorydurham.org/collections-old/online-collection/?item-id=277780
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Request typescript if useful. Keep separate from Edleston: this corrects the earlier role/£75 confusion.

Watlington-Colts / Trussbutts

Historic status: 16 Dec 1929 predecessor; 12 Feb 1930 operative Humphreys -> Edleston conveyance · Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys -> R.H. Edleston

Current legal category: Potential survivors include minerals/working rights, sporting/game, chase/warren, piscary, market/fair and certain works liabilities

Current stance:

Evidence: Primary 1930 deed conveys for £100, as beneficial owner, four manors/reputed manors/lordships including Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts, each so far as subsisting, with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances; it recites the 16 Dec 1929 Green/Public Trustee -> Humphreys fee-simple conveyance.

Notes: Manor / Record: Watlington-Colts / Trussbutts
Date / Period: 16 Dec 1929 predecessor; 12 Feb 1930 operative Humphreys -> Edleston conveyance
Lord / Rights Holder: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys -> R.H. Edleston
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Vendor / purchaser; former customary tenants/right burdeners separately relevant
What the Public Record Proves: Primary 1930 deed conveys for £100, as beneficial owner, four manors/reputed manors/lordships including Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts, each so far as subsisting, with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances; it recites the 16 Dec 1929 Green/Public Trustee -> Humphreys fee-simple conveyance.
Compensation / Amount: £100 purchase consideration in 1930 deed; any separate manorial-incident compensation amount remains unknown
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Extinguished classes: rents/fines/heriots/reliefs/dues etc. only if still outstanding as compensation rights
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Potential survivors include minerals/working rights, sporting/game, chase/warren, piscary, market/fair and certain works liabilities
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: YES: general rights package in 1930 deed; NO: individual substantive right not proved merely by general words
Evidence Status: User-supplied primary conveyance previously analysed + statutory/HMLR framework
Direct Source URL: Treat 12 Feb 1930 as the rights-survival gateway. For each right prove: Colts ownership before 1930; non-extinguishment/non-severance; deed did not exclude it; then trace post-1930 devolution and modern priority.

Gawsels, Watlington — White 1845

Historic status: 1845 · Charles Berners Plestow

Current legal category: No mineral/sporting/franchise rights are described in this source

Current stance:

Evidence: Yearly courts leet and baron were held and the directory expressly states 'fines arbitrary'.

Notes: Manor / Record: Gawsels, Watlington — White 1845
Date / Period: 1845
Lord / Rights Holder: Charles Berners Plestow
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Customary tenants / suit of court
What the Public Record Proves: Yearly courts leet and baron were held and the directory expressly states 'fines arbitrary'.
Compensation / Amount: No amount stated
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: ARBITRARY FINES are directly proven historically; court leet/baron structure also proven
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: No mineral/sporting/franchise rights are described in this source
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Yes for arbitrary fines and yearly courts in 1845 only
Evidence Status: Direct contemporary directory transcription
Direct Source URL: https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1845.shtml
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Search later rentals/court papers and compensation records to determine whether arbitrary fines still subsisted at 1 Jan 1926 or had already lapsed/enfranchised.

Gawsels, Watlington — White 1883

Historic status: 1883 · George Coote

Current legal category: No substantive preserved rights described

Current stance:

Evidence: Yearly courts leet and baron were still reported under George Coote.

Notes: Manor / Record: Gawsels, Watlington — White 1883
Date / Period: 1883
Lord / Rights Holder: George Coote
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Customary tenants / suit of court
What the Public Record Proves: Yearly courts leet and baron were still reported under George Coote.
Compensation / Amount: No amount stated
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Court structure proved; source does not repeat 'fines arbitrary'
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: No substantive preserved rights described
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Yes for yearly courts in 1883; no specific fine/rent amount proved
Evidence Status: Direct contemporary directory transcription
Direct Source URL: https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1883.shtml
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Find 1883–1926 court/rental material to identify last actual courts, copyholders, fines, rents and enfranchisements.

Unnamed Manor of Watlyngton — 1506 final concord

Historic status: 8 Jul 1506 · Identity not equated with Gawsels/Colts

Current legal category: Advowson also conveyed; not a 1922 incident category

Current stance:

Evidence: Final concord includes 16s rent, one free fold and the advowson of St Peter with the manor and extensive land.

Notes: Manor / Record: Unnamed Manor of Watlyngton — 1506 final concord
Date / Period: 8 Jul 1506
Lord / Rights Holder: Identity not equated with Gawsels/Colts
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Henry Wyatt et al. / Robert and Elizabeth Pynkeney
What the Public Record Proves: Final concord includes 16s rent, one free fold and the advowson of St Peter with the manor and extensive land.
Compensation / Amount: 16s rent stated in property description
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Historic rent/free-fold/manorial property rights
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Advowson also conveyed; not a 1922 incident category
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Yes for the unnamed manor in 1506; identity with Gawsels/Colts unproved
Evidence Status: Primary-derived Feet of Fines record with AALT image route
Direct Source URL: https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_170_197.shtml
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Keep as comparator only unless an independent chain identifies this 1506 manor with Gawsels/Colts.

Law of Property Act 1925 s.62(3) — conveyance rule

Historic status: Applicable to later conveyances subject to commencement/terms · Purchaser of a manor

Current legal category: Same rule can carry preserved minerals/sporting/franchise rights if they appertain and are not excluded

Current stance:

Evidence: A conveyance of a manor presumptively passes courts, reliefs, heriots, fines, chief/quit rents, royalties, franchises, minerals, fisheries and the right to compensation for extinguished incidents, unless contrary intention appears.

Notes: Manor / Record: Law of Property Act 1925 s.62(3) — conveyance rule
Date / Period: Applicable to later conveyances subject to commencement/terms
Lord / Rights Holder: Purchaser of a manor
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Vendor
What the Public Record Proves: A conveyance of a manor presumptively passes courts, reliefs, heriots, fines, chief/quit rents, royalties, franchises, minerals, fisheries and the right to compensation for extinguished incidents, unless contrary intention appears.
Compensation / Amount: Compensation right passes as an appurtenant manor right unless excluded
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Potentially all existing appurtenant manor rights, subject to deed wording
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Same rule can carry preserved minerals/sporting/franchise rights if they appertain and are not excluded
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Framework only — actual Watlington deed missing
Evidence Status: Official primary legislation
Direct Source URL: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1925/20/pdfs/ukpga_19250020_en.pdf
Next Retrieval / Research Action: When the 1929 Watlington deed is found, inspect exclusions/reservations first. Do not assume the title alone conveyed every historical right if the deed expressed a contrary intention.

Bowes Manorial Rights purchases — D/HH 8/1

Historic status: 1925–1934 · R.H. Edleston as purchaser of quantified rights

Current legal category: Bowes sporting/stint rights demonstrably continued

Current stance:

Evidence: Edleston bought separate manorial-right interests with stated rateable values and considerations after the reforms.

Notes: Manor / Record: Bowes Manorial Rights purchases — D/HH 8/1
Date / Period: 1925–1934
Lord / Rights Holder: R.H. Edleston as purchaser of quantified rights
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Various vendors/trustees
What the Public Record Proves: Edleston bought separate manorial-right interests with stated rateable values and considerations after the reforms.
Compensation / Amount: 1928: £50 consideration for rights rated £19 5s; 1931: £140 for £82 5s.5d rateable rights; 1934: £47 for £21 6s.6d rights
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Rights were income/value interests rather than generic extinguished copyhold incidents
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Bowes sporting/stint rights demonstrably continued
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Yes for quantified Bowes 'Manorial Rights', but exact component rights need the conveyances/abstracts
Evidence Status: Primary deeds/abstracts survive; catalogue detailed
Direct Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ByRelevancy=No&ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165399&ItemNum=250&PageNum=9&Variations=
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Request D/HH 8/1/16-30 and 33 to see exactly what 'manorial rights' meant in each conveyance and compare drafting with Watlington acquisition language.

Bowes sporting/stint rights — D/MOB & D/Ed

Historic status: 1925–1955 · Lords in Trust / owners of manorial rights; Edleston owned interests

Current legal category: These are examples of substantive rights continuing outside ordinary extinguished copyhold incidents

Current stance:

Evidence: Holmes estate book records stints and birds; 1933–34 file covers letting sporting rights; Edleston profit schedules continue to 1955.

Notes: Manor / Record: Bowes sporting/stint rights — D/MOB & D/Ed
Date / Period: 1925–1955
Lord / Rights Holder: Lords in Trust / owners of manorial rights; Edleston owned interests
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Sporting lessees, stint owners and tenants
What the Public Record Proves: Holmes estate book records stints and birds; 1933–34 file covers letting sporting rights; Edleston profit schedules continue to 1955.
Compensation / Amount: 1890 directory: shooting right over Bowes Moor let for £1,400 p.a.; later Edleston profit amounts are in surviving schedules but not public metadata
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Stints/common-related economic interests; sporting rights
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: These are examples of substantive rights continuing outside ordinary extinguished copyhold incidents
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Yes for Bowes sporting/stint administration, not for Watlington
Evidence Status: Primary archive metadata + contemporary directory
Direct Source URL: https://www.thestorydurham.org/collections-old/online-collection/?item-id=169834
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Use as a drafting/rights comparator only. Do not infer that Watlington possessed Bowes-style stints or sporting rights.

National government compensation route — MAF 13 / MAF 27

Historic status: 1920s–1940s · Lord of manor / compensation recipient

Current legal category: Expressly-added preserved rights may also appear if included

Current stance:

Evidence: TNA states MAF 13 contains compensation agreements/certificates and MAF 27 contains certificates determining compensation.

Notes: Manor / Record: National government compensation route — MAF 13 / MAF 27
Date / Period: 1920s–1940s
Lord / Rights Holder: Lord of manor / compensation recipient
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Former copyholder/freehold owner or Ministry
What the Public Record Proves: TNA states MAF 13 contains compensation agreements/certificates and MAF 27 contains certificates determining compensation.
Compensation / Amount: File-specific
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Exact incident classes may be stated in agreement/award
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Expressly-added preserved rights may also appear if included
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: No Watlington-specific file found in public indexed search yet
Evidence Status: Critical national research route
Direct Source URL: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/manorial-documents-lordships-how-to-use-manorial-document-register/
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Ask/search TNA MDR/Discovery by parish Watlington, manor variants Gawsels/Gawsells/Colts/Trussbutts and Edleston; also search Ministry schedules not indexed by modern manor name.

Structural rule — lordship ≠ land ≠ rights

Historic status: Current HMLR position · Could be lordship owner, landowner or separate rights owner

Current legal category: Any surviving right follows its own chain of title, not automatically the lordship

Current stance:

Evidence: Lordship title, manorial land and manorial rights are legally separable. A lordship can survive with no land and no rights; manorial rights can be severed and disposed of separately.

Notes: Manor / Record: Structural rule — lordship ≠ land ≠ rights
Date / Period: Current HMLR position
Lord / Rights Holder: Could be lordship owner, landowner or separate rights owner
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: N/A
What the Public Record Proves: Lordship title, manorial land and manorial rights are legally separable. A lordship can survive with no land and no rights; manorial rights can be severed and disposed of separately.
Compensation / Amount: N/A
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Not an extinguishment category
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Any surviving right follows its own chain of title, not automatically the lordship
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Framework only
Evidence Status: Official HMLR Practice Guide 22
Direct Source URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/manors/practice-guide-22-manors
Next Retrieval / Research Action: For Watlington, build a separate chain for each claimed fishery, mineral, sporting or franchise right and map the burdened modern parcels.

Fishing / piscary

Historic status: Current legal/registration framework · Owner of fishery/profit — possibly separate from lordship and land

Current legal category: Can survive enfranchisement and separation from surface land if validly retained; can later be sold/released/extinguished

Current stance:

Evidence: A fishing right can be a profit à prendre: a right to take fish from another person's land/water. It may exist in gross and be sold separately.

Notes: Manor / Record: Fishing / piscary
Date / Period: Current legal/registration framework
Lord / Rights Holder: Owner of fishery/profit — possibly separate from lordship and land
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Surface/lake/river owner may be different
What the Public Record Proves: A fishing right can be a profit à prendre: a right to take fish from another person's land/water. It may exist in gross and be sold separately.
Compensation / Amount: Not inherently a compensation item unless dealt with by agreement
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Historic piscary/fishing may be a preserved manorial right
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Can survive enfranchisement and separation from surface land if validly retained; can later be sold/released/extinguished
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Not proved for Watlington
Evidence Status: Official HMLR PG16 + LPA 1922 Schedule 12 framework
Direct Source URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/profits-a-prendre-taking-natural-resources-from-anothers-land-pg16/practice-guide-16-profits-a-prendre
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Search deeds, court rolls, inclosure/enfranchisement papers and registered titles for piscary/fishery wording. Do not infer from the mere presence of a lake.

Mines and minerals

Historic status: Current legal/registration framework · Mineral owner — potentially lord/rights holder separate from surface owner

Current legal category: Can survive independently; exact minerals, depth, entry/working rights and parcels must be proved

Current stance:

Evidence: Surface land and mines/minerals can be separately owned. Former-copyhold mineral rights could survive enfranchisement unless expressly extinguished.

Notes: Manor / Record: Mines and minerals
Date / Period: Current legal/registration framework
Lord / Rights Holder: Mineral owner — potentially lord/rights holder separate from surface owner
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Surface proprietor may be different
What the Public Record Proves: Surface land and mines/minerals can be separately owned. Former-copyhold mineral rights could survive enfranchisement unless expressly extinguished.
Compensation / Amount: Could be separately compensated if included in agreement
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Minerals and working/access rights were among preserved manorial rights
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Can survive independently; exact minerals, depth, entry/working rights and parcels must be proved
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Not proved for Watlington
Evidence Status: Official HMLR PG65 / Historical Rights
Direct Source URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/registration-of-mines-and-minerals-pg65/practice-guide-65-registration-of-mines-and-minerals
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Search original enfranchisement/conveyance reservations, MAF compensation agreements and every affected modern title for mineral exceptions/notices.

Sporting / game rights

Historic status: Current legal/registration framework · Sporting-right owner — may be separate from surface owner

Current legal category: Can survive land disposal if retained, but must be proved and geographically tied to burdened land

Current stance:

Evidence: HMLR recognises the lord's sporting rights among manorial rights; Schedule 12 preserved hunting, shooting, fishing, fowling and game rights on enfranchisement unless later dealt with.

Notes: Manor / Record: Sporting / game rights
Date / Period: Current legal/registration framework
Lord / Rights Holder: Sporting-right owner — may be separate from surface owner
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Surface owner/occupier may be different
What the Public Record Proves: HMLR recognises the lord's sporting rights among manorial rights; Schedule 12 preserved hunting, shooting, fishing, fowling and game rights on enfranchisement unless later dealt with.
Compensation / Amount: May be extinguished only if validly surrendered/included in agreement
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Sporting/game rights
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Can survive land disposal if retained, but must be proved and geographically tied to burdened land
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Not proved for Watlington
Evidence Status: Official HMLR PG22 / PG66 and LPA 1922 framework
Direct Source URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/manors/practice-guide-22-manors
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Search conveyances/reservations, shooting leases/game books, compensation agreements and title notices. Do not assume all historic manor land remains subject.

Post-2013 enforceability

Historic status: After 12 Oct 2013 · Owner of surviving manorial right

Current legal category: Protection by notice/caution and the registration/disposition chronology can determine present enforceability

Current stance:

Evidence: Rights did not automatically vanish in 2013, but they lost automatic overriding protection and may be defeated by later registered purchases for value if not protected.

Notes: Manor / Record: Post-2013 enforceability
Date / Period: After 12 Oct 2013
Lord / Rights Holder: Owner of surviving manorial right
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Modern registered land purchaser
What the Public Record Proves: Rights did not automatically vanish in 2013, but they lost automatic overriding protection and may be defeated by later registered purchases for value if not protected.
Compensation / Amount: N/A
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Applies to surviving manorial rights generally
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Protection by notice/caution and the registration/disposition chronology can determine present enforceability
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Must be checked parcel by parcel
Evidence Status: Official HMLR PG22 / PG66
Direct Source URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013/practice-guide-66-overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013
Next Retrieval / Research Action: For any claimed Watlington right, identify affected HM Land Registry titles and check whether a notice/caution exists and whether a post-2013 disposition for value intervened.

Watlington Colts — 12 Feb 1930 conveyance gateway

Historic status: 12 Feb 1930 · Robert Holmes Edleston as purchaser

Current legal category: No extinct/severed right is recreated; preserved rights pass only if actually still attached and not excluded

Current stance:

Evidence: Primary-instrument analysis: Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts conveyed so far as subsisting with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances.

Notes: Manor / Record: Watlington Colts — 12 Feb 1930 conveyance gateway
Date / Period: 12 Feb 1930
Lord / Rights Holder: Robert Holmes Edleston as purchaser
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys as vendor
What the Public Record Proves: Primary-instrument analysis: Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts conveyed so far as subsisting with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances.
Compensation / Amount: Purchase consideration not restated in prior rights handover extract
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Any surviving appurtenant right; compensation entitlement under LPA 1925 s.62(3)
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: No extinct/severed right is recreated; preserved rights pass only if actually still attached and not excluded
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: General rights class YES; specific right-by-right survival still requires proof
Evidence Status: Primary user-supplied conveyance / prior rights analysis
Direct Source URL: Use full deed images to extract reservations/exceptions and compare every candidate right against the 28-row legacy ledger.

Hare Estate / Shouldham Forest sporting reservation

Historic status: 1943 lease context; official plan 2016–2026 · Hare Estate at Stow Bardolph retained sporting rights

Current legal category: Sporting rights are a preserved substantive class

Current stance:

Evidence: Official forest plan states management began in 1943 under a 999-year Hare Estate lease and sporting rights were retained and exercised in Shouldham Sincks.

Notes: Manor / Record: Hare Estate / Shouldham Forest sporting reservation
Date / Period: 1943 lease context; official plan 2016–2026
Lord / Rights Holder: Hare Estate at Stow Bardolph retained sporting rights
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Forestry Commission / Forestry England leaseholder
What the Public Record Proves: Official forest plan states management began in 1943 under a 999-year Hare Estate lease and sporting rights were retained and exercised in Shouldham Sincks.
Compensation / Amount: Not stated
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Sporting/hunting/shooting/game rights
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Sporting rights are a preserved substantive class
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: YES for wider Hare Estate reservation; NO Colts appurtenance proof
Evidence Status: Official Forestry England PDF
Direct Source URL: https://www.forestryengland.uk/sites/default/files/documents/ShouldhamandBilneyForestPlan2016-2026_0.pdf
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Recover actual 1943 lease; identify exact demised parcels, reservation wording, right owner, successors/assigns and relationship to Colts Farm/manor.

Watlington 1749 Inclosure — rights transformation gate

Historic status: Royal Assent 26 May 1749 · Lord/commoners under Watlington inclosure

Current legal category: Only rights preserved/reserved by award/deeds could continue

Current stance:

Evidence: Separate Watlington inclosure regime potentially transformed commons, wastes, lord's allotments, roads, drains, fold-related rights and possibly mineral reservations.

Notes: Manor / Record: Watlington 1749 Inclosure — rights transformation gate
Date / Period: Royal Assent 26 May 1749
Lord / Rights Holder: Lord/commoners under Watlington inclosure
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Affected proprietors/commoners
What the Public Record Proves: Separate Watlington inclosure regime potentially transformed commons, wastes, lord's allotments, roads, drains, fold-related rights and possibly mineral reservations.
Compensation / Amount: Award-specific
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Commons/wastes/fold/roads/drains and any express mineral reservations
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Only rights preserved/reserved by award/deeds could continue
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Act known; decisive award/map/claims still not in hand
Evidence Status: Primary legislation title known; award/map retrieval required
Direct Source URL: Recover full Act, award, map, claims and commissioners' papers before deciding survival of fold/common/waste/mineral rights.

Shouldham Woods — Forestry lease / estate reversion

Historic status: 1943 lease continuing; current Forestry England plan · Hare Estate at Stow Bardolph as 1943 lessor in Forestry plan; current superior proprietor not named in public Forestry source

Current legal category: [Inference] A superior/reversionary estate remains outside the Forestry lease unless transferred or lease enlarged/merged; exact present proprietor must be proved from lease/HMLR.

Current stance:

Evidence: Shouldham remains leasehold; 999-year lease began in 1943 from Hare Estate; Norfolk County Council independently says Forestry leased Warren from the landowner; sporting rights retained by estate.

Notes: Manor / Record: Shouldham Woods — Forestry lease / estate reversion
Date / Period: 1943 lease continuing; current Forestry England plan
Lord / Rights Holder: Hare Estate at Stow Bardolph as 1943 lessor in Forestry plan; current superior proprietor not named in public Forestry source
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Forestry Commission / Forestry England as leaseholder/manager
What the Public Record Proves: Shouldham remains leasehold; 999-year lease began in 1943 from Hare Estate; Norfolk County Council independently says Forestry leased Warren from the landowner; sporting rights retained by estate.
Compensation / Amount: Lease consideration/rent not exposed
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Sporting rights expressly retained; mineral/timber/access/reservation clauses unknown
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: [Inference] A superior/reversionary estate remains outside the Forestry lease unless transferred or lease enlarged/merged; exact present proprietor must be proved from lease/HMLR.
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: YES for leasehold structure and sporting reservation; NO current registered proprietor or Colts appurtenance proof
Evidence Status: Official Forestry England plan/current page + Norfolk County Council 2022
Direct Source URL: https://www.forestryengland.uk/forest-planning/shouldham-and-bilney-forest-plan
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Recover actual 1943 lease and registered titles; identify lessor/freeholder or other superior owner, rent, demise, sporting/mineral/timber/access reservations, successors and any variations.

Shouldham Sincks — current owner statement

Historic status: 23 Jan 2021 · Stow Estates (as named by Shouldham Parish Council)

Current legal category: Any Colts piscary/sporting/mineral right would have to be separately proved as burdening this land or severed from it

Current stance:

Evidence: Parish Council expressly says Shouldham Sincks is owned by Stow Estates.

Notes: Manor / Record: Shouldham Sincks — current owner statement
Date / Period: 23 Jan 2021
Lord / Rights Holder: Stow Estates (as named by Shouldham Parish Council)
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Forestry England manages access/woodland under lease context
What the Public Record Proves: Parish Council expressly says Shouldham Sincks is owned by Stow Estates.
Compensation / Amount: N/A
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Physical land/freehold ownership; reserved sporting rights separately relevant
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Any Colts piscary/sporting/mineral right would have to be separately proved as burdening this land or severed from it
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Current owner statement YES; exact registered title/entity NO
Evidence Status: Official parish-council webpage
Direct Source URL: https://shouldham-pc.gov.uk/2021/01/23/shouldham-sincks-change-of-access/
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Obtain Land Registry title and map; do not equate Stow Estates with Stow Estate Trust until legal identity is proved.

Shouldham enclosure / timber licence

Historic status: 1798 schedule; manuscript licence embedded in surviving copy · Thomas Hare / Hare estate context

Current legal category: Timber rights may be land ownership or an incident/custom; exact licence terms required

Current stance:

Evidence: Surviving 1798 enclosure schedule covers allotments, roads, footpaths, drain, fences, rules and orders and includes a manuscript 'License to fell timber' signed Thomas Hare.

Notes: Manor / Record: Shouldham enclosure / timber licence
Date / Period: 1798 schedule; manuscript licence embedded in surviving copy
Lord / Rights Holder: Thomas Hare / Hare estate context
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Affected tenant/parcel not exposed in catalogue
What the Public Record Proves: Surviving 1798 enclosure schedule covers allotments, roads, footpaths, drain, fences, rules and orders and includes a manuscript 'License to fell timber' signed Thomas Hare.
Compensation / Amount: Unknown
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Timber; roads; drainage; allotments; commons/wastes
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Timber rights may be land ownership or an incident/custom; exact licence terms required
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: YES that a Thomas Hare timber licence survives; NO exact parcel/right character
Evidence Status: Academic catalogue of digitised Kress copy
Direct Source URL: https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/1055420672
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Obtain/open the actual 11-page facsimile and inspect pp.8-9 licence, signatures, dates, affected land and relationship to Colts parcels.

Hare ↔ Hoff exchange maps

Historic status: c.1900 · Hare estate / Hoff estate

Current legal category: Rights may have been reserved even where surface parcels changed hands

Current stance:

Evidence: Five OS sheets survive marked for exchange across Shouldham, Shouldham Thorpe, Marham and Wormegay.

Notes: Manor / Record: Hare ↔ Hoff exchange maps
Date / Period: c.1900
Lord / Rights Holder: Hare estate / Hoff estate
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Exchange counterpart
What the Public Record Proves: Five OS sheets survive marked for exchange across Shouldham, Shouldham Thorpe, Marham and Wormegay.
Compensation / Amount: Unknown
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Potential physical land, sporting, mineral, timber and access reservations
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Rights may have been reserved even where surface parcels changed hands
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Exchange proven; exact parcels/rights unread
Evidence Status: Official NRO/TNA catalogue
Direct Source URL: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/c587d73c-e321-4732-afc5-dce032497f69
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Obtain HARE 6956/1-5 plus HARE 6374-5; create parcel-by-parcel before/after schedule and record every reservation.

Shouldham rabbit warren / Hare estate

Historic status: 1845 · Sir Thomas Hare, Bart.

Current legal category: Any franchise/sporting right must be distinguished from simple ownership/management of warren land

Current stance:

Evidence: White states 2,674 of 3,775 parish acres, including a rabbit warren, belonged to Hare and names a warrener.

Notes: Manor / Record: Shouldham rabbit warren / Hare estate
Date / Period: 1845
Lord / Rights Holder: Sir Thomas Hare, Bart.
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: William Brighton, warrener; tenant farmers including Charles Lemmon at Colts Hall
What the Public Record Proves: White states 2,674 of 3,775 parish acres, including a rabbit warren, belonged to Hare and names a warrener.
Compensation / Amount: No separate rent/fee for warren stated
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Physical warren land; possible sporting/free-warren interests require separate proof
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Any franchise/sporting right must be distinguished from simple ownership/management of warren land
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Hare estate landholding YES; separate Colts warren right NO
Evidence Status: Contemporary directory transcription
Direct Source URL: https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/s/shouldham/white1845.shtml
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Recover 1634 warren lease and later shooting/estate leases to determine whether any incorporeal right was separately reserved or merely followed land ownership.

Fodderston / Foston Gap — ownership versus lease control

Historic status: 1845 · Dean and Chapter of Ely as owner

Current legal category: Demonstrates why possession/control cannot be treated as ownership and why rights disposition must be deed-specific

Current stance:

Evidence: Separate local example where Hare controlled/leased a manor and tithes without owning the underlying property.

Notes: Manor / Record: Fodderston / Foston Gap — ownership versus lease control
Date / Period: 1845
Lord / Rights Holder: Dean and Chapter of Ely as owner
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Sir Thomas Hare as lessee; tithes included
What the Public Record Proves: Separate local example where Hare controlled/leased a manor and tithes without owning the underlying property.
Compensation / Amount: Lease terms/rent not stated
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Leasehold possession; tithe income; manorial/property interests
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Demonstrates why possession/control cannot be treated as ownership and why rights disposition must be deed-specific
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Yes for Fodderston separation; context only for Colts
Evidence Status: Contemporary directory transcription
Direct Source URL: https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/s/shouldham_thorpe/white1845.shtml
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Use as interpretive control only; do not import Fodderston rights into Colts.

Shouldham sporting/game enforcement

Historic status: 1779-1780 · Sir Thomas Hare

Current legal category: Sporting right could be estate/freehold, manorial or separately reserved; exact legal source not exposed

Current stance:

Evidence: Digital account reports Forby's appointment as gamekeeper of Hare's manor at Shouldham and a 1780 case after guns were seized from Morris.

Notes: Manor / Record: Shouldham sporting/game enforcement
Date / Period: 1779-1780
Lord / Rights Holder: Sir Thomas Hare
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Joseph Forby as gamekeeper; John Overland; Jonathan Morris
What the Public Record Proves: Digital account reports Forby's appointment as gamekeeper of Hare's manor at Shouldham and a 1780 case after guns were seized from Morris.
Compensation / Amount: Damages/costs in litigation; no sporting rent stated
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Sporting/game control; keeper enforcement
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: Sporting right could be estate/freehold, manorial or separately reserved; exact legal source not exposed
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Historic exercise YES; Colts-specific right NO
Evidence Status: Secondary digital account citing primary-derived published pleading
Direct Source URL: https://finchamlocalhistorysociety.uk/rectors/
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Inspect Wentworth vol.2 pp.1-4 and locate any Hare estate/gamekeeper appointment or game-book records.

Shouldham Poors' Land and Fuel Allotment / peat-turf

Historic status: 1794 award; documented 1845; described in 1836 village context · Beneficiaries: poor persons of parish of Shouldham

Current legal category: A beneficiary-specific right/allotment distinct from a lord's proprietary mineral or sporting interest; later legal status still deed/charity-scheme dependent

Current stance:

Evidence: Charity Commission identifies governing document as 1794 Inclosure Award (P.R. 29.(1) p.520); White 1845 says Shouldham Fuel Allotment was 95A and awarded at enclosure; council history notes peat cutting in 1836 context.

Notes: Manor / Record: Shouldham Poors' Land and Fuel Allotment / peat-turf
Date / Period: 1794 award; documented 1845; described in 1836 village context
Lord / Rights Holder: Beneficiaries: poor persons of parish of Shouldham
Tenant / Payer / Other Party: Trustees/commissioners not identified in public metadata
What the Public Record Proves: Charity Commission identifies governing document as 1794 Inclosure Award (P.R. 29.(1) p.520); White 1845 says Shouldham Fuel Allotment was 95A and awarded at enclosure; council history notes peat cutting in 1836 context.
Compensation / Amount: N/A
Statutory Incident Types Potentially Relevant: Poor/common resource entitlement — fuel/turf/peat
Rights Preserved Unless Expressly Included: A beneficiary-specific right/allotment distinct from a lord's proprietary mineral or sporting interest; later legal status still deed/charity-scheme dependent
Exact Rights Proved for This Manor?: Origin YES — 1794 award; exact full terms and modern survival/status not yet established
Evidence Status: Official statutory register + contemporary directory transcription + official council history
Direct Source URL: https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/207556/governing-document
Next Retrieval / Research Action: Retrieve full P.R. 29.(1) p.520 / 1794 award, map and claims; identify exact 95A parcel, trustees, access/turf terms, later schemes and any disposal/extinguishment.

Lordship / manorial title

Historic status: Historic lordship capable of separate existence. PASS 8 separation correction: contemporary directories positively identify Plestow (1845) and Coote (1883) as lords of Gawsells in Watlington; they do not independently prove a Colts title chain.

Current legal category: Incorporeal hereditament; separate from land/rights

Current stance:

Evidence: Historic title chain; HMLR PG22 framework

Notes: Do not convert the generic NRO Watlington Manor authority record or the Gawsells directory entries into a Colts conveyance. Absence of the word Colts in a directory is not proof that the same person owned no second manor. Search the operative Colt assurance under George Colt/Colte/Coult of Cavendish, esquire, son/heir of Henry Colt; do not assume 'Sir George Colt, son of George'. PASS 10 requires the early Baynard/Shouldham estate to be bridged into the later Trussbutts/Colts stream before its Domesday resources are attributed to the manor. PASS 12: this dual-fee structure is a core identity-control rule for the whole rights reconstruction.
right_or_incident: Lordship / manorial title
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Historic title chain; HMLR PG22 framework
historic_status: Historic lordship capable of separate existence. PASS 8 separation correction: contemporary directories positively identify Plestow (1845) and Coote (1883) as lords of Gawsells in Watlington; they do not independently prove a Colts title chain.
key_change_or_survival_event: LRA 2002 framework remains relevant. PASS 8: the official MDR exposes a generic Watlington Manor record-creator series, but its undifferentiated metadata cannot merge Colts with the Davis/Plestow/Tottenhill stream. Plestow/Coote Colts ownership still requires an express conveyance or contemporaneous inventory. PASS 9: official Essex Archives D/P 214/25/11 corrects the later Colt generation: George Colt of Cavendish was son/heir of Henry Colt, son/heir of the elder Sir George Colt; the 2025 narrative's seller generation is therefore compressed/mistaken. PASS 10: the 2025 catalogue's alleged Domesday Watlington-Colts bundle is source-conflated; Open Domesday shows the £2 Baynard holding at Shouldham Thorpe and the mill/fishery/church package in a different Baynard Shouldham entry. PASS 12: 1403 Laurence Trussebute is recorded on both the main multi-place Watlington fee and a separate Watlington quarter-fee; by 1427 Thomas Trusbut holds the main fee while Robert Kervyle holds the quarter-fee. Generic Trussbut+Watlington evidence must therefore be stream-tested. PASS 13: supplied legal chronology places Humphreys -> Robert Holmes Edleston conveyance on 12 Feb 1930. LPA 1925 s.62(3) potentially carries then-existing appurtenant/reputed appurtenant manor rights unless contrary intention expressed. Subsequent supplied chain runs through estate administration and 1977 assents, Richard John Hanby Holmes, 2017 probate, Olivia Mary Holmes and the current Watlington-West endpoint. PASS 14: TNA HMC 5/6-8 identified as official 1920s government-derived lists of manors and title owners, a new pre-1930 corroboration target. HMLR current search route clarified: SIF searches registered manors/relating franchises; SIM does not. PASS 15: private 1930 deed and 1977 assents replace earlier public-search gaps. 1930 deed expressly conveys the named manors as far as subsisting with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances.
current_legal_category: Incorporeal hereditament; separate from land/rights
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Modern lordship chain is treated as sufficient for present-benefit transmission. PASS 16 removes the current executed transfer as a rights-survival bottleneck: the question is which Colts/Trussbutts rights were still subsisting by 1930.
connection_to_colts: Core Colts title stream; Gawsells/Davis/Plestow/Coote stream must remain separate unless expressly joined
present_claim_assessment: CURRENT LORDSHIP CHAIN ACCEPTED FOR PROJECT PURPOSES; RIGHTS ANALYSIS NOW ENTIRELY PRE-1930 SURVIVAL
next_decisive_document: 1749 Watlington award; 1798 Shouldham award; Colts-specific court/copyhold/enfranchisement records; c.1900 severance files
notes: Do not convert the generic NRO Watlington Manor authority record or the Gawsells directory entries into a Colts conveyance. Absence of the word Colts in a directory is not proof that the same person owned no second manor. Search the operative Colt assurance under George Colt/Colte/Coult of Cavendish, esquire, son/heir of Henry Colt; do not assume 'Sir George Colt, son of George'. PASS 10 requires the early Baynard/Shouldham estate to be bridged into the later Trussbutts/Colts stream before its Domesday resources are attributed to the manor. PASS 12: this dual-fee structure is a core identity-control rule for the whole rights reconstruction.

Manorial land / Colts Farm / capital messuage

Historic status: Physical estate historically identifiable

Current legal category: Corporeal land, not automatically a manorial right

Current stance:

Evidence: HARE 2495; HARE 5466 and other estate evidence

Notes: A person can own parish land, a hall and one named manor without that evidence proving title to every other local manor. Inspect all of HARE 2826, not merely mapped fols 16v/34v: scholarship says the maps cover only a tiny part of the written draft survey.
right_or_incident: Manorial land / Colts Farm / capital messuage
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: HARE 2495; HARE 5466 and other estate evidence
historic_status: Physical estate historically identifiable
key_change_or_survival_event: Land may be severed from lordship. PASS 8: White's 1845 directory says Plestow owned most parish land and Watlington Hall while separately calling him lord of Gawsells. Estate ownership therefore does not itself prove ownership of Colts or its incorporeal rights. PASS 10: Historic England's HARE 2495 summary remains strong evidence that Colt's/Trussbutt's was a separately identifiable physical estate in 1633 with tenements, alder carr, Appletons and tenant occupation. PASS 11: NRO HARE 2826 is now identified as a Shouldham field book/draft survey of 1440-41 with diagrammatic field-strip maps at fols 16v and 34v. The producing manor is not yet identified. PASS 13: physical manorial land is legally distinct from the lordship and from incorporeal manorial rights. c.1900 HARE 6956/HARE 6374-5 exchanges are a key pre-1926 severance gate. PASS 14: physical land/parcel side must be searched through SIM/index-map and current/historic registers, separately from SIF manor/franchise search.
current_legal_category: Corporeal land, not automatically a manorial right
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Late physical Colts identity is now exceptionally useful for exclusion as well as inclusion: White 1845 separately lists a Colts Hall farmer, Abbey Farm farmer and warrener; HARE 5466 post-1874 separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm. Full HARE 5466 is now the key source for allocating minerals, sporting, timber and other estate rights to the correct unit.
connection_to_colts: Historic Colts estate connection strong; later Hall/Gawsells ownership is not automatic Colts proof
present_claim_assessment: LATE COLTS PHYSICAL ESTATE STRONGLY IDENTIFIABLE AND OPERATIONALLY SEPARATE FROM ABBEY/WARREN UNITS; USE AS PRIMARY PARCEL-ALLOCATION CONTROL
next_decisive_document: Complete HARE 5466 schedule/tenancy package; full Shouldham award/map; HARE 6832; tithe apportionment; HARE 6374/6375 and HARE 6956 exchange plans
notes: A person can own parish land, a hall and one named manor without that evidence proving title to every other local manor. Inspect all of HARE 2826, not merely mapped fols 16v/34v: scholarship says the maps cover only a tiny part of the written draft survey.

16 shillings rent

Historic status: Direct 1506 rent remains proved. Earlier generic Watlyngton rent/court records may expose its origin or structure, but their contents and exact Colts identity are unread.

Current legal category: Exact type unresolved

Current stance:

Evidence: 1506 CP 25/1/170/197 no.106; HARE 4058 (1411-1412) and F(M) roll 160 (1452-1453) are newly identified earlier rent/court tests, not yet matched to the 1506 rent

Notes: Do not call the rent extinguished until its type and chain are established; do not treat any generic Watlington rent account as Colts without internal identification. PASS 11: HARE 2826 may provide earlier survey/rent context, but no rent text has been read from the original. Do not equate Parlettes with the 1506 rent without an instrument or parcel/title bridge. PASS 66: the Kervile wills strengthen the competing-rent control but do not identify Parlettes with the capital messuage or with Wyatt's 16s rent.
right_or_incident: 16 shillings rent
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1506 CP 25/1/170/197 no.106; HARE 4058 (1411-1412) and F(M) roll 160 (1452-1453) are newly identified earlier rent/court tests, not yet matched to the 1506 rent
historic_status: Direct 1506 rent remains proved. Earlier generic Watlyngton rent/court records may expose its origin or structure, but their contents and exact Colts identity are unread.
key_change_or_survival_event: LPA 1922 s.140 remains relevant if the 16s was a quit/chief/free rent or other manorial incident. PASS 8 downgrades HARE 2454 from a preferred Colts source and adds HARE 4058 plus F(M) roll 160 as earlier identity-controlled tests. PASS 10: same 1506 predecessor-title problem as the free fold; Pynkeney/Elizabeth -> Wyatt/Pegge must be bridged to the Trussbutts/Colts stream. PASS 12: PCC PROB 11/19/108 transcription records a separate 'Rent in Watlyngton called Parlettes' given in 1518 to Thomas Karvyle the younger. This strengthens the need to distinguish the 1506 16s rent from Kervile and other Watlington rent streams. PASS 13: if a valid rent still appertained to the manor on 12 Feb 1930, LPA 1925 s.62(3) is potentially relevant; however earlier statutory extinguishment, redemption, merger or severance must first be excluded. PASS 66: direct Kervile probate-derived evidence now shows a separate early-Tudor Watlington estate carrying rents and services; Thomas Kervile elder's 1522/1535 will also bundles rents/reversions/suits/services with his capital messuage. This reinforces the need to keep Kervile rents, including Parlettes, separate from the Wyatt 1506 16s rent unless an instrument bridges them.
current_legal_category: Exact type unresolved
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic 1506 rent is direct for that Watlyngton transaction but its Colts identity and legal character remain uncertain. If it was a manorial quit/customary rent, the 1922 extinguishment/compensation regime is adverse to survival; no evidence currently shows an independent rentcharge surviving to 1930.
connection_to_colts: Direct in working 1506 manor bundle
present_claim_assessment: WEAK CURRENT CANDIDATE — LEGAL CHARACTER AND LATER CONTINUATION UNPROVED; ORDINARY MANORIAL RENT WOULD NOT SURVIVE AS CURRENT PRIVILEGE
next_decisive_document: Pre-1506 Pynkeney/Elizabeth title; HARE 2826 if it proves the relevant manor; HARE 4058 1411-12 rent account; Henry Wyatt 1537 IPM/will; later rentals/conveyances
notes: Do not call the rent extinguished until its type and chain are established; do not treat any generic Watlington rent account as Colts without internal identification. PASS 11: HARE 2826 may provide earlier survey/rent context, but no rent text has been read from the original. Do not equate Parlettes with the 1506 rent without an instrument or parcel/title bridge. PASS 66: the Kervile wills strengthen the competing-rent control but do not identify Parlettes with the capital messuage or with Wyatt's 16s rent.

One free fold

Historic status: Historic fold/fold-liberty case materially strengthened: 1506 direct Watlyngton free fold plus 1597 bundled-title fold liberty. Exact exclusivity to Colts still requires original deed allocation.

Current legal category: Historic fold/foldcourse custom or proprietary interest; not one of the narrow Schedule-12 manorial-right categories expressly listed by HMLR PG66. Any modern survival requires proof of a separate proprietary/easement/profit/land route.

Current stance:

Evidence: 1506 CP25/1/170/197 no.106 records one free fold in Watlyngton; PASS 13 adds HARE 2403 (20 Oct 1597), a title exemplification for a package expressly including Watlyngton/Watlyngton Coltes and a liberty of a fold in Watlyngton and other places.

Notes: The custumal is the right document type to explain fold obligations, but its title is uncertain and top illegible. BL/MA 34 must be treated as a Gawsells/Tottenhill comparator unless Colts is expressly named. Do not infer a fold from field-strip mapping alone. PASS 66: Kervile foldcourse evidence does not extinguish or disprove the separate 1506 Wyatt free fold or the 1597 Colts fold liberty; it makes title-stream allocation more important.
right_or_incident: One free fold
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1506 CP25/1/170/197 no.106 records one free fold in Watlyngton; PASS 13 adds HARE 2403 (20 Oct 1597), a title exemplification for a package expressly including Watlyngton/Watlyngton Coltes and a liberty of a fold in Watlyngton and other places.
historic_status: Historic fold/fold-liberty case materially strengthened: 1506 direct Watlyngton free fold plus 1597 bundled-title fold liberty. Exact exclusivity to Colts still requires original deed allocation.
key_change_or_survival_event: 1749 enclosure is still the likely transformation point; 1926 copyhold abolition followed. PASS 8 adds HARE 4056 (uncertain 14th-century custumal), F(M) roll 160 and BL/MA 34 as custom/court tests, but none is internally identified as Colts. PASS 10: the 1506 fine expressly says the manor/free fold/advowson were acknowledged by Robert Pynkeney and Elizabeth as property Henry Wyatt, Richard Wyatt and Reynold Pegge had of their gift, with quitclaim from themselves and Elizabeth's heirs. PASS 11: HARE 2826 adds a 1440-41 Shouldham field-system source, but no fold/foldage wording from the original has been recovered. PASS 13: HARE 2402 expressly anchors Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes in the 1597 operative title; HARE 2403 follows with fold-liberty wording. Modern survival remains blocked by 1749 enclosure, pre-1926 estate dealings and the absence of the 1930 conveyance wording. PASS 15: 1930 deed expressly conveys then-subsisting rights/royalties/members/appurtenances with Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts. PASS 66: Thomas Kervile elder's will dated 31 Jan 1522 (proved 1535) directly gives the liberties of a foldcourse-and-a-half in Watlington with his capital-messuage estate. This proves that fold/foldcourse language occurred in a competing Kervile stream and cannot by itself identify the 1506 free fold as Colts/Trussbutts.
current_legal_category: Historic fold/foldcourse custom or proprietary interest; not one of the narrow Schedule-12 manorial-right categories expressly listed by HMLR PG66. Any modern survival requires proof of a separate proprietary/easement/profit/land route.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic Colts fold/fold-liberty remains one of the strongest specifically associated rights. PASS 19 adds no evidence of same-right survival and reinforces the need to distinguish Colts claims from Abbey Common/other parish rights in the enclosure award.
connection_to_colts: Direct in working 1506 manor bundle
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC COLTS FOLD RIGHT STRONG; NO PASS 18 EVIDENCE RESCUES SAME-RIGHT SURVIVAL — ENCLOSURE SUBSTITUTE REMAINS THE ONLY SERIOUS MODERN ROUTE
next_decisive_document: Full 1749 Watlington award/map; full 1798 Shouldham/Thorpe award/map; HARE 2403 original; parcel matching
notes: The custumal is the right document type to explain fold obligations, but its title is uncertain and top illegible. BL/MA 34 must be treated as a Gawsells/Tottenhill comparator unless Colts is expressly named. Do not infer a fold from field-strip mapping alone. PASS 66: Kervile foldcourse evidence does not extinguish or disprove the separate 1506 Wyatt free fold or the 1597 Colts fold liberty; it makes title-stream allocation more important.

Advowson of St Peter / Watlington patronage

Historic status: Directly appurtenant in 1506; later patronage separately identifiable

Current legal category: Separate ecclesiastical patronage right governed by church-law registration/transfer regime; not a saleable modern manorial appurtenance.

Current stance:

Evidence: 1506 CP 25/1/170/197 no.106

Notes: Strongest resolved modern legal effect. The c.1930 inventory is catalogue-only and unread. PASS 9 narrows a nineteenth-century severance/transfer window: Plestow patron in 1845; Barker patron by 1870-72; Coote lord of Gawsells while Barker patron in 1883. PASS 11 found no new Pynkeney/Elizabeth or Henry Wyatt document bridging the 1506 advowson into the Colts stream. PASS 12: superior Wormegay held generic advowsons in 1441, but this does not bridge the specific 1506 St Peter advowson into Colts.
right_or_incident: Advowson of St Peter / Watlington patronage
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1506 CP 25/1/170/197 no.106
historic_status: Directly appurtenant in 1506; later patronage separately identifiable
key_change_or_survival_event: Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 s.32 severed any advowson then appendant to manor/land; s.3 bars sale for value PASS 9: White 1845 places the Watlington rectory in C.B. Plestow's gift while naming him lord of Gawsells; the 1870-72 Imperial Gazetteer names G. Barker as patron; White 1883 names Coote lord of Gawsells but Gilbert Barker patron. Thus patronage was separately owned from the named Gawsells lordship by this period. PASS 10: the 1506 fine's 'of their gift' wording and quitclaim from Elizabeth's heirs makes the Pynkeney/Elizabeth predecessor title a necessary identity test before the 1506 advowson is treated as continuous Colts evidence. PASS 13: Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 s.3 provides that a right of patronage cannot be sold and a transfer for valuable consideration is void.
current_legal_category: Separate ecclesiastical patronage right governed by church-law registration/transfer regime; not a saleable modern manorial appurtenance.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Private 1930 conveyance broadly transferred then-subsisting rights/appurtenances, but nineteenth-century evidence already shows Watlington patronage separately owned from the named manor stream, and current patronage is governed by separate ecclesiastical law. No present advowson passes merely with Watlington-West.
connection_to_colts: Direct in 1506 working Watlyngton bundle; later identity/devolution unproved. PASS 9 demonstrates that nineteenth-century Watlington patronage did not automatically accompany the named Gawsells lordship.
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC ADVOWSON PROVED; SEPARATE PATRONAGE STREAM; NOT A CURRENT MANOR-SALE RIGHT
next_decisive_document: Diocesan patronage register/current registered patron; historic Plestow->Barker transfer; intermediate presentation deeds
notes: Strongest resolved modern legal effect. The c.1930 inventory is catalogue-only and unread. PASS 9 narrows a nineteenth-century severance/transfer window: Plestow patron in 1845; Barker patron by 1870-72; Coote lord of Gawsells while Barker patron in 1883. PASS 11 found no new Pynkeney/Elizabeth or Henry Wyatt document bridging the 1506 advowson into the Colts stream. PASS 12: superior Wormegay held generic advowsons in 1441, but this does not bridge the specific 1506 St Peter advowson into Colts.

Court baron / customary court

Historic status: A five-record Watlington court/custom/rent sequence is now identified across two archives. Every item remains identity-unresolved for Colts because the MDR uses an undifferentiated Watlington Manor creator name.

Current legal category: Historic jurisdiction/evidentiary institution; copyhold abolition ended the last meaningful land-tenure function of manorial courts.

Current stance:

Evidence: Official MDR Watlington series: HARE 4056 custumal (14th c.); HARE 4058 rent account (1411-1412); F(M) roll 160 court roll (1452-1453); HARE 2454 court book (1554-1558); BL/MA 34 draft court book (1746-1767)

Notes: HMLR requires custom of the particular manor. Generic creator metadata cannot merge multiple Watlington streams. PASS 10 rejected a tempting 1381-1930 court-roll series on the sale catalogue because page-boundary checking showed it belongs to Wivenhoe, not Watlington Colts. Do not import customs from 'Dersingham Shouldham' merely because the record title contains Shouldham.
right_or_incident: Court baron / customary court
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Official MDR Watlington series: HARE 4056 custumal (14th c.); HARE 4058 rent account (1411-1412); F(M) roll 160 court roll (1452-1453); HARE 2454 court book (1554-1558); BL/MA 34 draft court book (1746-1767)
historic_status: A five-record Watlington court/custom/rent sequence is now identified across two archives. Every item remains identity-unresolved for Colts because the MDR uses an undifferentiated Watlington Manor creator name.
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 8 correction: HARE 2454 is no longer the strongest Colts candidate by chronology alone. F(M) roll 160 is the highest transition-era inspection priority, while BL/MA 34 is an enclosure-era comparator in a Davis/Tottenhill context likely associated with Gawsells. PASS 11: exact NRO refs WAL 1058, 285x2 (Dersingham Shouldham court rolls 1495-1509) and PD 603/197 (Dersingham Shouldham rental 1499/1500) are recorded as a separate comparator stream, not Colts. PASS 12: historic Public Records inventory expressly lists 'Watlington, manor. Roll of court baron and customary court, anno 14 Hen. VI' (1435-36). The current shelfmark and specific lord/manor stream are not yet identified.
current_legal_category: Historic jurisdiction/evidentiary institution; copyhold abolition ended the last meaningful land-tenure function of manorial courts.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: An actual Watlington court baron/customary court roll of 1435-36 is verified in the historic inventory, but it cannot yet be assigned to Colts/Trussbutts. If the original heading identifies the Trussbut manor, it could become direct evidence of its customs and incidents.
connection_to_colts: RECORD SET STRONG; PARTICULAR-MANOR IDENTITY UNPROVED
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC COURT/CUSTOM EVIDENCE TARGET; NOT A PRESENT EXERCISABLE FEUDAL JURISDICTION
next_decisive_document: Recover modern shelfmark and full 1435-36 Watlington court roll; identify lord/steward/manor and extract all customs, admissions, fines, rents, heriots, fold/common and court incidents
notes: HMLR requires custom of the particular manor. Generic creator metadata cannot merge multiple Watlington streams. PASS 10 rejected a tempting 1381-1930 court-roll series on the sale catalogue because page-boundary checking showed it belongs to Wivenhoe, not Watlington Colts. Do not import customs from 'Dersingham Shouldham' merely because the record title contains Shouldham.

Heriots / customary fines / reliefs / fealty / suit / copyhold admissions

Historic status: Exact local incidents are now testable across a dated Watlington record set, but none may be assumed merely because such incidents were typical of manorial courts.

Current legal category: Extinguished/compensated manorial incidents if they existed

Current stance:

Evidence: Potential evidence in HARE 4056, F(M) roll 160, HARE 2454 and BL/MA 34; no incident yet transcribed or identified as Colts

Notes: BL/MA 34 may demonstrate Gawsells/Davis/Plestow court practice and must not be imported into Colts without an express joining instrument. PASS 11: WAL 1058 / PD 603/197 are preserved only as a separate Dersingham Shouldham comparator; no incident from them is attributed to Colts.
right_or_incident: Heriots / customary fines / reliefs / fealty / suit / copyhold admissions
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Potential evidence in HARE 4056, F(M) roll 160, HARE 2454 and BL/MA 34; no incident yet transcribed or identified as Colts
historic_status: Exact local incidents are now testable across a dated Watlington record set, but none may be assumed merely because such incidents were typical of manorial courts.
key_change_or_survival_event: LPA 1922 compulsory enfranchisement and s.140 extinguishment regime remains decisive for incidents that existed. PASS 8 adds earlier and enclosure-era evidence targets while increasing the particular-manor identity caution. PASS 13 current-period focus: ordinary copyhold/manorial incidents fall on the extinguishment/compensation side of the 1922-1926 reforms; any surviving compensation claim would need its own documentary chain.
current_legal_category: Extinguished/compensated manorial incidents if they existed
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Not treated as present privileges; historic Colts incidence remains unproved until an internally identified Colts record is read.
connection_to_colts: Generic Watlington evidentiary targets; exact Colts identity awaits inspection
present_claim_assessment: EXTINGUISHED / HISTORIC ONLY — NOT A CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST PRIVILEGE
next_decisive_document: F(M) roll 160; HARE 4056; HARE 2454; BL/MA 34; MAF 13/27
notes: BL/MA 34 may demonstrate Gawsells/Davis/Plestow court practice and must not be imported into Colts without an express joining instrument. PASS 11: WAL 1058 / PD 603/197 are preserved only as a separate Dersingham Shouldham comparator; no incident from them is attributed to Colts.

Mines / minerals

Historic status: Possible historic manorial category

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance:

Evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet

Notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.
right_or_incident: Mines / minerals
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet
historic_status: Possible historic manorial category
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserved category; PG65 says survival depends on manor custom/enfranchisement and later dealings PASS 13: expressly within the narrow manorial-right categories preserved through enfranchisement and recognised by HMLR PG66. If still appurtenant in 1930, LPA 1925 s.62(3) could potentially carry the benefit unless excluded; 2013 priority must then be checked parcel-by-parcel. PASS 14: official Norfolk planning material confirms significant silica-sand geology in the wider Shouldham/Marham/Tottenhill/Stow landscape, increasing practical value of the mineral-title question without proving ownership. PASS 17: nearby Tottenhill enclosure evidence shows local awards could expressly provide sand/gravel pits, while modern Watlington/Shouldham planning confirms substantial mineral resources. These are methodological/value evidence only, not Colts title. PASS 18: official local history records a nine-acre Shouldham digging ground feeding a lime kiln; BGS records an old sand pit at Shouldham Warren. These prove extraction/resource presence but not Colts ownership.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Legally capable of survival and real Shouldham extraction/resource evidence exists. PASS 19 cautions that the strongest identified pit/Warren/Abbey evidence is geographically and operationally outside the known Colts Hall core, while HARE 5466 separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm. No Colts-specific mineral title/reservation has been recovered.
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: HIGH-VALUE SURVIVABLE CLASS; LOCAL EXTRACTION PROVED BUT CURRENT EVIDENCE DOES NOT ATTRIBUTE IT TO COLTS — PARCEL/ENFRANCHISEMENT PROOF REQUIRED
next_decisive_document: HARE 5466 full Colts Farm schedules; Shouldham/Watlington enclosure awards; Colts copyhold/enfranchisement papers; MAF 9/13/27; c.1900 exchange deeds
notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.

Limestone / lime / clay / stone / gravel

Historic status: Possible manorial category

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance:

Evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet

Notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.
right_or_incident: Limestone / lime / clay / stone / gravel
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet
historic_status: Possible manorial category
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserved PASS 13: expressly within the narrow manorial-right categories preserved through enfranchisement and recognised by HMLR PG66. If still appurtenant in 1930, LPA 1925 s.62(3) could potentially carry the benefit unless excluded; 2013 priority must then be checked parcel-by-parcel. PASS 14: official Norfolk planning material confirms significant silica-sand geology in the wider Shouldham/Marham/Tottenhill/Stow landscape, increasing practical value of the mineral-title question without proving ownership. PASS 17: nearby Tottenhill enclosure evidence shows local awards could expressly provide sand/gravel pits, while modern Watlington/Shouldham planning confirms substantial mineral resources. These are methodological/value evidence only, not Colts title.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Legally capable of survival and real Shouldham extraction/resource evidence exists. PASS 19 cautions that the strongest identified pit/Warren/Abbey evidence is geographically and operationally outside the known Colts Hall core, while HARE 5466 separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm. No Colts-specific mineral title/reservation has been recovered.
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: HIGH-VALUE SURVIVABLE CLASS; LOCAL EXTRACTION PROVED BUT CURRENT EVIDENCE DOES NOT ATTRIBUTE IT TO COLTS — PARCEL/ENFRANCHISEMENT PROOF REQUIRED
next_decisive_document: HARE 5466 full Colts Farm schedules; Shouldham/Watlington enclosure awards; Colts copyhold/enfranchisement papers; MAF 9/13/27; c.1900 exchange deeds
notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.

Pits / quarries

Historic status: Possible manorial category

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance:

Evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet

Notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.
right_or_incident: Pits / quarries
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet
historic_status: Possible manorial category
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserved PASS 13: expressly within the narrow manorial-right categories preserved through enfranchisement and recognised by HMLR PG66. If still appurtenant in 1930, LPA 1925 s.62(3) could potentially carry the benefit unless excluded; 2013 priority must then be checked parcel-by-parcel. PASS 14: official Norfolk planning material confirms significant silica-sand geology in the wider Shouldham/Marham/Tottenhill/Stow landscape, increasing practical value of the mineral-title question without proving ownership. PASS 17: nearby Tottenhill enclosure evidence shows local awards could expressly provide sand/gravel pits, while modern Watlington/Shouldham planning confirms substantial mineral resources. These are methodological/value evidence only, not Colts title. PASS 18: official local history records a nine-acre Shouldham digging ground feeding a lime kiln; BGS records an old sand pit at Shouldham Warren. These prove extraction/resource presence but not Colts ownership.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Legally capable of survival and real Shouldham extraction/resource evidence exists. PASS 19 cautions that the strongest identified pit/Warren/Abbey evidence is geographically and operationally outside the known Colts Hall core, while HARE 5466 separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm. No Colts-specific mineral title/reservation has been recovered.
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: HIGH-VALUE SURVIVABLE CLASS; LOCAL EXTRACTION PROVED BUT CURRENT EVIDENCE DOES NOT ATTRIBUTE IT TO COLTS — PARCEL/ENFRANCHISEMENT PROOF REQUIRED
next_decisive_document: HARE 5466 full Colts Farm schedules; Shouldham/Watlington enclosure awards; Colts copyhold/enfranchisement papers; MAF 9/13/27; c.1900 exchange deeds
notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.

Mineral entry / search / working rights

Historic status: Possible ancillary rights

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival if underlying mineral right/custom survives

Current stance:

Evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet

Notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.
right_or_incident: Mineral entry / search / working rights
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: No direct Colts reservation yet
historic_status: Possible ancillary rights
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserved ancillary powers/easements PASS 13: expressly within the narrow manorial-right categories preserved through enfranchisement and recognised by HMLR PG66. If still appurtenant in 1930, LPA 1925 s.62(3) could potentially carry the benefit unless excluded; 2013 priority must then be checked parcel-by-parcel. PASS 14: official Norfolk planning material confirms significant silica-sand geology in the wider Shouldham/Marham/Tottenhill/Stow landscape, increasing practical value of the mineral-title question without proving ownership. PASS 17: nearby Tottenhill enclosure evidence shows local awards could expressly provide sand/gravel pits, while modern Watlington/Shouldham planning confirms substantial mineral resources. These are methodological/value evidence only, not Colts title. PASS 18: official local history records a nine-acre Shouldham digging ground feeding a lime kiln; BGS records an old sand pit at Shouldham Warren. These prove extraction/resource presence but not Colts ownership.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival if underlying mineral right/custom survives
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Legally capable of survival and real Shouldham extraction/resource evidence exists. PASS 19 cautions that the strongest identified pit/Warren/Abbey evidence is geographically and operationally outside the known Colts Hall core, while HARE 5466 separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm. No Colts-specific mineral title/reservation has been recovered.
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: HIGH-VALUE SURVIVABLE CLASS; LOCAL EXTRACTION PROVED BUT CURRENT EVIDENCE DOES NOT ATTRIBUTE IT TO COLTS — PARCEL/ENFRANCHISEMENT PROOF REQUIRED
next_decisive_document: HARE 5466 full Colts Farm schedules; Shouldham/Watlington enclosure awards; Colts copyhold/enfranchisement papers; MAF 9/13/27; c.1900 exchange deeds
notes: The MDR record set proves archival survival only. Do not claim minerals from a custumal/court-book catalogue entry, and do not import a Gawsells custom into Colts. PASS 11 recovered no new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation. Geological resource/planning potential is not a title source. Still require manor custom/reservation, 1930 deed, modern burdened parcels and HMLR priority.

Sporting / hunting / shooting / fowling

Historic status: Post-1926 substantive estate sporting right positively evidenced

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance:

Evidence: Official Forestry England plan: 1943 Hare Estate 999-year lease context, sporting rights retained and exercised in Shouldham Sincks

Notes: The exchange catalogue and MDR records are evidentiary routes, not proof of a sporting reservation or Colts title connection. Current leasehold classification is structural corroboration only; it is not proof that the 1943 sporting reservation is unchanged or appurtenant to Colts. Do not equate Stow Estates' landownership with sporting-right ownership.
right_or_incident: Sporting / hunting / shooting / fowling
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Official Forestry England plan: 1943 Hare Estate 999-year lease context, sporting rights retained and exercised in Shouldham Sincks
historic_status: Post-1926 substantive estate sporting right positively evidenced
key_change_or_survival_event: 1943 reservation/exercise evidenced in the wider Hare Estate context. PASS 7: HARE 6374/1-4 and 6375/1-72 now identify the 1899-1905 Hare/Hoff exchange as a possible reservation/severance point, but no sporting clause or Colts parcel has been read. PASS 9: current Forestry England webpage continues to classify Shouldham as leasehold land, consistent with the historic long-lease framework, but does not identify current sporting-right ownership. PASS 11: Forestry plan states retained estate sporting rights were exercised in the Sincks; Shouldham Parish Council states Shouldham Sincks was owned by Stow Estates in 2021. PASS 13: this category is expressly capable of surviving within the modern Schedule-12/HMLR framework. Any valid Colts right still existing in 1930 could potentially pass under LPA 1925 s.62(3) unless excluded, but 2013 priority and present ownership must be proved. PASS 14: 2010 official local-authority report describes the Hare family's Stow Estate as a traditional Norfolk farming and shooting estate of about 4,000 acres at that time; Stow Estate Trust is a currently identifiable estate entity. PASS 15: supplied 1930 and 1977 deeds materially strengthen the modern benefit-side transmission of any such right that was still subsisting with Watlington Colts at 1930.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Modern Hare/Stow sporting-right survival remains real, but PASS 19 further separates the underlying estate streams. The physical Warren has a serious Priory/other-estate competing origin and cannot be treated as Colts sporting evidence without parcel/title linkage.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — modern wider-estate stream; Warren origin now has serious Priory/other-Hare competing hypothesis
present_claim_assessment: SURVIVING SPORTING STREAM PROVED OUTSIDE THE SPECIFIC COLTS TITLE; COLTS BENEFIT NOT YET PROVED
next_decisive_document: HARE 5466 complete Colts Farm schedule; c.1900 Hare exchange deeds; 1943 Forestry lease/plan; pre-1632/17th-century estate rentals distinguishing Colts from Abbey/Warren
notes: The exchange catalogue and MDR records are evidentiary routes, not proof of a sporting reservation or Colts title connection. Current leasehold classification is structural corroboration only; it is not proof that the 1943 sporting reservation is unchanged or appurtenant to Colts. Do not equate Stow Estates' landownership with sporting-right ownership.

Warren / chase

Historic status: Free warren is historically verified in Watlington at the superior Bardolf/Wormegay level; no Trussbut/Colts subgrant or descent is yet proved.

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance:

Evidence: PASS 12 upgrade: calendar-derived 19 July 1254 royal charter grants William Bardolf and heirs free warren in demesne lands expressly including Watlington; 1441 Phelipp IPM also records warrens in the superior Wormegay franchise bundle.

Notes: Do not confuse a land-name warren with a franchise. Use only internally identified Colts/Watlyngton entries; generic creator metadata is insufficient. PASS 11 did not recover the underlying 1634 Shouldham Warren lease reference or text. PASS 14: modern Stow shooting-estate evidence strengthens continuity of a wider sporting/warren landscape but is not a Colts title bridge.
right_or_incident: Warren / chase
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: PASS 12 upgrade: calendar-derived 19 July 1254 royal charter grants William Bardolf and heirs free warren in demesne lands expressly including Watlington; 1441 Phelipp IPM also records warrens in the superior Wormegay franchise bundle.
historic_status: Free warren is historically verified in Watlington at the superior Bardolf/Wormegay level; no Trussbut/Colts subgrant or descent is yet proved.
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserves chase/warren PASS 13: this category is expressly capable of surviving within the modern Schedule-12/HMLR framework. Any valid Colts right still existing in 1930 could potentially pass under LPA 1925 s.62(3) unless excluded, but 2013 priority and present ownership must be proved. PASS 15: supplied 1930 and 1977 deeds materially strengthen the modern benefit-side transmission of any such right that was still subsisting with Watlington Colts at 1930.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Shouldham Warren survival into the Hare/modern sporting estate is strongly evidenced. PASS 19 materially weakens attribution to Colts: VCH records that Shouldham Priory possessed a Henry III free-warren franchise somewhere in its institutional estate; a 1425 IPM separately records the prior's Shouldham/Wereham/Stoke Ferry fee; 1845 separately lists a warrener, Abbey Farm farmer and Colts Hall farmer; HARE 5466 later separately names Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm; and the Warren lies materially north of the known Colts Hall core. Exact Priory-warren locality and later Warren title remain unresolved.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED AND NOW MATERIALLY DOUBTFUL AS AN INFERENCE — Priory/other Hare-estate origin is a serious competing hypothesis
present_claim_assessment: SHOULDHAM WARREN SURVIVAL STRONGLY PROVED; WATLINGTON-COLTS OWNERSHIP NOT PROVED; PRIORY/OTHER-ESTATE ORIGIN MUST BE EXCLUDED
next_decisive_document: Hundred Rolls I pp458/519/532/538; Quo Warranto p489; Henry III warren charter; pre-1632 Warren records; 1634 lease; HARE 5466 full schedules; Shouldham award/map
notes: Do not confuse a land-name warren with a franchise. Use only internally identified Colts/Watlyngton entries; generic creator metadata is insufficient. PASS 11 did not recover the underlying 1634 Shouldham Warren lease reference or text. PASS 14: modern Stow shooting-estate evidence strengthens continuity of a wider sporting/warren landscape but is not a Colts title bridge.

Piscary / fishing

Historic status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham fishery resource proved; historic Watlington-Colts piscary not proved

Current legal category: Legally capable of survival

Current stance:

Evidence: PASS 10 correction: fishery is directly recorded in Ralph Baynard's separate Shouldham Domesday entry; the 2025 catalogue's attribution of it to a £2 'Watlington Colts' manor is not supported as one Domesday entry.

Notes: Do not cite the 2025 catalogue's combined £2 + fishery wording as direct Colts evidence.
right_or_incident: Piscary / fishing
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: PASS 10 correction: fishery is directly recorded in Ralph Baynard's separate Shouldham Domesday entry; the 2025 catalogue's attribution of it to a £2 'Watlington Colts' manor is not supported as one Domesday entry.
historic_status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham fishery resource proved; historic Watlington-Colts piscary not proved
key_change_or_survival_event: Schedule 12 preserves piscaries/fishing PASS 10 downgrades the auction narrative: the £2 Baynard Shouldham Thorpe entry has no fishery, while the Baynard Shouldham entry with the fishery is valued £15 6s. PASS 13: this category is expressly capable of surviving within the modern Schedule-12/HMLR framework. Any valid Colts right still existing in 1930 could potentially pass under LPA 1925 s.62(3) unless excluded, but 2013 priority and present ownership must be proved. PASS 15: supplied 1930 and 1977 deeds materially strengthen the modern benefit-side transmission of any such right that was still subsisting with Watlington Colts at 1930.
current_legal_category: Legally capable of survival
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: No direct Colts piscary/fishing right or chain of devolution is proved. The Domesday fishery is a wider Shouldham/Baynard lead only until descent/recombination into Colts is demonstrated.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — wider Baynard/Shouldham evidence only
present_claim_assessment: LEGALLY SURVIVABLE CLASS, BUT CURRENT HISTORIC EVIDENCE IS BAYNARD/SHOULDHAM RATHER THAN COLTS
next_decisive_document: HMLR SIF/SIM as appropriate if a specific franchise/profit is identified; historic Colts bridge; 1930/current transfer; burdened-parcel register
notes: Do not cite the 2025 catalogue's combined £2 + fishery wording as direct Colts evidence.

Watlington market franchise

Historic status: Historic Watlington market evidenced

Current legal category: Potential relating franchise

Current stance:

Evidence: Gazetteer: prescriptive market noted 1252

Notes: Not a proved 1252 charter grant. A generic Watlington court reference could show local exercise but would not itself prove ownership by Colts or present survival.
right_or_incident: Watlington market franchise
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Gazetteer: prescriptive market noted 1252
historic_status: Historic Watlington market evidenced
key_change_or_survival_event: PG18: franchise separate from land; prescription/devolution/exercise evidence required PASS 13: fairs/markets are expressly listed by HMLR PG66 as a potentially surviving manorial-right category; title, exercise/devolution and 2013 protection remain unproved for Colts. PASS 15: if a Colts market/fair franchise was still subsisting/appurtenant in 1930, the private conveyance's rights/royalties/appurtenances wording materially strengthens transmission into the Edleston chain.
current_legal_category: Potential relating franchise
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Market/fair events are historically real and survived locally, but PASS 19 spatial evidence places Fair Stead northwest of Shouldham while the known Colts core is east of the village. Geography is not title, but no documentary or spatial evidence currently attributes the franchise to Colts.
connection_to_colts: Ownership by Colts not proved
present_claim_assessment: SURVIVABLE FRANCHISE CLASS / LOCAL EVENT CONTINUITY, BUT COLTS TITLE REMAINS ENTIRELY UNPROVED AND PRIORITY IS LOWER
next_decisive_document: Original source behind Dymond; F(M) roll 160 and HARE 2454 for evidence of exercise; title/devolution; franchise index
notes: Not a proved 1252 charter grant. A generic Watlington court reference could show local exercise but would not itself prove ownership by Colts or present survival.

Shouldham market / fairs

Historic status: Historic separate Shouldham stream

Current legal category: Potential franchise

Current stance:

Evidence: Prescriptive market by 1334 + later fairs

Notes: right_or_incident: Shouldham market / fairs
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Prescriptive market by 1334 + later fairs
historic_status: Historic separate Shouldham stream
key_change_or_survival_event: Market/fair franchises can survive separately if title proven PASS 13: fairs/markets are expressly listed by HMLR PG66 as a potentially surviving manorial-right category; title, exercise/devolution and 2013 protection remain unproved for Colts. PASS 15: if a Colts market/fair franchise was still subsisting/appurtenant in 1930, the private conveyance's rights/royalties/appurtenances wording materially strengthens transmission into the Edleston chain.
current_legal_category: Potential franchise
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Market/fair events are historically real and survived locally, but PASS 19 spatial evidence places Fair Stead northwest of Shouldham while the known Colts core is east of the village. Geography is not title, but no documentary or spatial evidence currently attributes the franchise to Colts.
connection_to_colts: Not assigned to Colts
present_claim_assessment: SURVIVABLE FRANCHISE CLASS / LOCAL EVENT CONTINUITY, BUT COLTS TITLE REMAINS ENTIRELY UNPROVED AND PRIORITY IS LOWER
next_decisive_document: Original franchise/devolution records

Tolls / stallage

Historic status: Historic separate manor rights lead

Current legal category: Separate stream

Current stance:

Evidence: HARE 2719 abstract, 1587, Shouldham Priory manor

Notes: Common Gawdy/Rich/Hare ownership is insufficient to merge rights.
right_or_incident: Tolls / stallage
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: HARE 2719 abstract, 1587, Shouldham Priory manor
historic_status: Historic separate manor rights lead
key_change_or_survival_event: HARE 2719 Shouldham Priory stream. PASS 6: 1611/1628 deeds demonstrate neighbouring manors continued to be separately named/legal packages.
current_legal_category: Separate stream
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic wider-estate/Priory toll and stallage evidence exists, but no current Colts franchise/title is proved. Any modern toll claim would require a surviving franchise/title, not common ownership alone.
connection_to_colts: Shouldham Priory stream
present_claim_assessment: EXCLUDE FROM COLTS UNTIL AN EXPRESS RECOMBINATION/RIGHT TRANSFER IS PROVED
next_decisive_document: HARE 2719 original plus any later deed expressly transferring/combining franchise rights with Colts
notes: Common Gawdy/Rich/Hare ownership is insufficient to merge rights.

Two fold liberties

Historic status: Historic separate Shouldham Priory-manor rights

Current legal category: Separate stream

Current stance:

Evidence: HARE 2719 abstract, 1587

Notes: Remain distinct from the ONE FREE FOLD expressly conveyed with Watlyngton in 1506.
right_or_incident: Two fold liberties
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: HARE 2719 abstract, 1587
historic_status: Historic separate Shouldham Priory-manor rights
key_change_or_survival_event: HARE 2719 separate Shouldham Priory stream; PASS 6 1611/1628 deed evidence strengthens separate-manor treatment.
current_legal_category: Separate stream
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Not current Colts proof
connection_to_colts: Shouldham Priory stream
present_claim_assessment: EXCLUDE FROM COLTS UNTIL EXPRESS TITLE/RIGHT RECOMBINATION IS PROVED
next_decisive_document: HARE 2719 original and later consolidation/assurance deeds
notes: Remain distinct from the ONE FREE FOLD expressly conveyed with Watlyngton in 1506.

Commons / wastes / common rights

Historic status: Historic commons/waste definitively subject to enclosure legislation

Current legal category: Post-enclosure land/right outcome depends on award

Current stance:

Evidence: 1749 Watlington Inclosure Act; surviving award extract NRO MS 7245, 7B4 (Elizabeth Roberts allotment)

Notes: Do not say the full award has been found and do not transfer an enclosure-era Gawsells court outcome to Colts without the operative award or an express consolidation.
right_or_incident: Commons / wastes / common rights
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1749 Watlington Inclosure Act; surviving award extract NRO MS 7245, 7B4 (Elizabeth Roberts allotment)
historic_status: Historic commons/waste definitively subject to enclosure legislation
key_change_or_survival_event: 1749 enclosure likely replaced/extinguished common rights with allotments/rules. PASS 8 adds BL/MA 34, whose Watlington section spans 1746-1767, as a before/after comparator; its Davis/Tottenhill context means it cannot be assigned to Colts without express identity evidence. PASS 11: 1798 Shouldham enclosure schedule provenance upgraded; it expressly covers allotments, roads, footpaths, drain, fences and rules. HARE 2826 also provides a 1440-41 field-system source, but neither is yet tied parcel-by-parcel to Colts. PASS 13: distinguish physical ownership of residual manorial waste from incorporeal common/manorial rights. LPA 1925 s.62(3) is relevant to a 1930 manor conveyance, but the 1749 award and later parcel deeds can have severed/transformed these interests.
current_legal_category: Post-enclosure land/right outcome depends on award
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Enclosure transformation of parish common rights remains strongly evidenced. PASS 19 adds a specifically named 'Abbey Common' in the 1796 Shouldham road notice, reinforcing that parish-level common landscapes must be allocated to the correct manor/estate before any Colts claim is made.
connection_to_colts: Watlington enclosure direct; particular manor/tenure outcome unresolved; BL/MA 34 likely Gawsells comparator
present_claim_assessment: OLD COMMON RIGHTS TRANSFORMED/EXTINGUISHED LOCALLY; COLTS SUBSTITUTE ALLOTMENT NOT FOUND; ABBEY-ASSOCIATED COMMON LANDSCAPE IS A COMPETING STREAM
next_decisive_document: Full Shouldham/Thorpe award and map using Charity Commission clue P.R. 29.(1) p.520; full 1749 Watlington award/map; parcel-match Colts
notes: Do not say the full award has been found and do not transfer an enclosure-era Gawsells court outcome to Colts without the operative award or an express consolidation.

Roads / ways / dykes / drains / protective works

Historic status: Potential historic rights/liabilities

Current legal category: Legally capable in certain forms

Current stance:

Evidence: Enclosure regimes + Schedule 12 legal category

Notes: Fenland geography and record type justify investigation but are not evidence of a right, liability or Colts ownership.
right_or_incident: Roads / ways / dykes / drains / protective works
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Enclosure regimes + Schedule 12 legal category
historic_status: Potential historic rights/liabilities
key_change_or_survival_event: Certain liabilities are capable of statutory preservation. PASS 8 adds a medieval custumal, transition court roll and enclosure-era draft court book as targets; no road, drainage or protective-work clause has been read. PASS 11: Heidelberg catalogue confirms the 1798 Shouldham schedule expressly covers public/private/bridle roads, footpaths, drain, fences, rules/orders; a local transcription also preserves 1796 commissioners' road-setting notices. PASS 13: certain liabilities for construction/maintenance/repair of dykes, ditches, canals and other works are within the modern HMLR-preserved manorial-right framework. Any Colts liability/right requires award/deed and parcel identification plus current priority analysis.
current_legal_category: Legally capable in certain forms
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic enclosure routes/drainage obligations are evidenced at parish/estate level. No individual Colts right or burden is yet identified without award/map and parcel matching.
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: LIMITED WORKS-LIABILITY CATEGORY CAN SURVIVE; NO COLTS-SPECIFIC CUSTOM OR OBLIGATION YET PROVED
next_decisive_document: Full 1749 Watlington award/map; full 1798 Shouldham award/map/schedule; parcel genealogy through HARE 2495/HARE 6832/tithe and modern titles
notes: Fenland geography and record type justify investigation but are not evidence of a right, liability or Colts ownership.

Timber

Historic status: Historic estate category possible

Current legal category: No automatic manorial title right

Current stance:

Evidence: 1798 Shouldham timber licence is separate; no direct Colts timber reservation

Notes: PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence.
right_or_incident: Timber
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1798 Shouldham timber licence is separate; no direct Colts timber reservation
historic_status: Historic estate category possible
key_change_or_survival_event: Old timber incidents subject to enfranchisement/compensation; ordinary ownership rules otherwise PASS 11: bibliographic record for the 1798 Shouldham enclosure schedule states that the surviving copy contains a manuscript 'License to fell timber' signed Thomas Hare between pp.8-9.
current_legal_category: No automatic manorial title right
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Estate-level timber control/licensing is evidenced in the surviving 1798 Shouldham enclosure copy, but no proprietary or manorial timber right specific to Colts is proved.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — common Hare ownership/estate context alone is insufficient
present_claim_assessment: ESTATE-LEVEL TIMBER DOCUMENT EXISTS; COLTS MANORIAL TIMBER RIGHT UNPROVED
next_decisive_document: Inspect manuscript timber licence and full 1798 schedule/award/map; identify parcels/manor; later Hare conveyances/reservations
notes: PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence.

Village green control

Historic status: Not inherent from lordship alone

Current legal category: Not automatic manorial right

Current stance:

Evidence: No direct evidence

Notes: right_or_incident: Village green control
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: No direct evidence
historic_status: Not inherent from lordship alone
key_change_or_survival_event: Commons/village green law separate
current_legal_category: Not automatic manorial right
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: No proof
connection_to_colts: Unproved
present_claim_assessment: NO PRESENT RIGHT PROVED
next_decisive_document: Commons register / land title

Modern access / wayleaves in Shouldham woodland estate

Historic status: Modern estate/leasehold access and wayleave context, not established as medieval/manorial rights

Current legal category: Ordinary easement/licence/wayleave/land-management rights unless contrary title evidence proves a manorial origin

Current stance:

Evidence: Forestry England Shouldham/Bilney Forest Plan; 2021 Shouldham Sincks access notice

Notes: Included to prevent modern estate access arrangements being accidentally described as surviving manorial privileges.
right_or_incident: Modern access / wayleaves in Shouldham woodland estate
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Forestry England Shouldham/Bilney Forest Plan; 2021 Shouldham Sincks access notice
historic_status: Modern estate/leasehold access and wayleave context, not established as medieval/manorial rights
key_change_or_survival_event: Forest plan refers to access to private houses and utility wayleaves; 2021 access control involved Stow Estates PASS 9: Forestry England's current page expressly classifies Shouldham as leasehold land with permissive access granted by the landowner. PASS 11: 2021 Parish Council identifies Stow Estates as Sincks landowner and says access remains required for Stow Estates/residents; Forestry plan separately records private-house access and utility wayleaves.
current_legal_category: Ordinary easement/licence/wayleave/land-management rights unless contrary title evidence proves a manorial origin
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Modern access/wayleave arrangements exist in the wider Shouldham woodland estate. No evidence ties them to the historical Colts lordship.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED
present_claim_assessment: DO NOT PRESENT AS A MANORIAL RIGHT OF COLTS
next_decisive_document: 1943 lease and all later variations/assignments; current land title; permissive-access/wayleave instruments; any deed expressly linking these to Colts
notes: Included to prevent modern estate access arrangements being accidentally described as surviving manorial privileges.

Mill / milling interest

Historic status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham economic resource proved; no direct Watlington-Colts mill right proved

Current legal category: A mill may be ordinary land/property or carry associated easements/profits; Domesday presence alone does not create a present manorial franchise.

Current stance:

Evidence: Ralph Baynard's Shouldham [All Saints and St Margaret]/other Shouldham Domesday entry: 0.8 mills

Notes: The 2025 catalogue's Domesday wording is insufficient. Distinguish physical mill property from any customary milling incident. PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence.
right_or_incident: Mill / milling interest
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Ralph Baynard's Shouldham [All Saints and St Margaret]/other Shouldham Domesday entry: 0.8 mills
historic_status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham economic resource proved; no direct Watlington-Colts mill right proved
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 10 source audit shows the 2025 catalogue combines the £2 Shouldham Thorpe valuation with resources from a different Baynard Shouldham entry.
current_legal_category: A mill may be ordinary land/property or carry associated easements/profits; Domesday presence alone does not create a present manorial franchise.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: No mill, milling monopoly, multure or other milling right is proved in the Colts chain.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — wider Baynard/Shouldham evidence only
present_claim_assessment: DO NOT PRESENT AS A WATLINGTON-COLTS RIGHT
next_decisive_document: Instrument bridging the relevant Baynard Shouldham estate/resource into Trussbutts/Colts; later court/custom/rental evidence
notes: The 2025 catalogue's Domesday wording is insufficient. Distinguish physical mill property from any customary milling incident. PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence.

Salthouse / salt-working profit

Historic status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham economic resource proved; not mentioned in the 2025 Watlington-Colts catalogue paragraph

Current legal category: Historic land/economic resource; no automatic surviving manorial privilege follows from Domesday description

Current stance:

Evidence: Ralph Baynard's Shouldham Domesday entry records 1 salthouse

Notes: Recorded to preserve a potentially relevant historic profit without silently importing it into the Colts rights bundle. PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence.
right_or_incident: Salthouse / salt-working profit
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: Ralph Baynard's Shouldham Domesday entry records 1 salthouse
historic_status: Historic Baynard/Shouldham economic resource proved; not mentioned in the 2025 Watlington-Colts catalogue paragraph
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 10 exposes the salthouse while auditing the Baynard Shouldham resource package, but no descent into Colts is proved.
current_legal_category: Historic land/economic resource; no automatic surviving manorial privilege follows from Domesday description
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: No salt-working, salthouse or related profit is proved for Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — wider Baynard/Shouldham evidence only
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC SHOULDHAM LEAD ONLY; NO COLTS RIGHT PROVED
next_decisive_document: Evidence proving descent/recombination of the relevant Shouldham estate into Trussbutts/Colts; later rentals/deeds
notes: Recorded to preserve a potentially relevant historic profit without silently importing it into the Colts rights bundle. PASS 13: current significance would require ordinary land/property ownership or an express reservation; no automatic current manorial privilege follows from historic evidence.

Castleward / castle-guard rent

Historic status: VERIFIED historic feudal burden on specified Watlington/Wormegay knight's-fee holdings; exact later Trussbut/Colts predecessor not identified.

Current legal category: Historic charge tied to medieval knight-service tenure; Tenures Abolition Act 1660 is the relevant abolition/conversion framework.

Current stance:

Evidence: 1329 Thomas Bardolf IPM/calendar material: Wormegay foreign tenants paid 2s 2d per full knight's fee at the end of every 24 weeks, called Castelwarde; multiple Watlington fee holdings expressly rendered it.

Notes: Do not turn a superior feudal burden into a present manorial privilege.
right_or_incident: Castleward / castle-guard rent
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1329 Thomas Bardolf IPM/calendar material: Wormegay foreign tenants paid 2s 2d per full knight's fee at the end of every 24 weeks, called Castelwarde; multiple Watlington fee holdings expressly rendered it.
historic_status: VERIFIED historic feudal burden on specified Watlington/Wormegay knight's-fee holdings; exact later Trussbut/Colts predecessor not identified.
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 12 first separately tracks this burden. The 1329 schedule names Watlington/Longham manor and other Watlington-linked fee holdings paying Castelward. PASS 65 source-controls the split: Geoffrey Bryseyard holds the Watlington-and-Longham manor for one fee, while a separate tenant group holds another one-fee Watlington/Foston/Wallington/Setchey/Hardwick block. Later 1610-11 Longham Priors/Holkham evidence creates a competing Longham-Watlington-Priors stream; therefore the 1329 Bryseyard manor is no longer treated as the likely Trusbut antecedent without an explicit descent bridge.
current_legal_category: Historic charge tied to medieval knight-service tenure; Tenures Abolition Act 1660 is the relevant abolition/conversion framework.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic Wormegay/Watlington burden only; no present Watlington-West liability established.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — Wormegay/Watlington predecessor context only
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC WATLINGTON BURDEN VERIFIED; COLTS LINK UNPROVED; NO CURRENT LIABILITY ESTABLISHED
next_decisive_document: Edward I eleven-membrane Wormegay fee/custom roll; original 1329 IPM membrane; 1390/1403/1427 fee comparison; Trussbut deeds/custumals
notes: Do not turn a superior feudal burden into a present manorial privilege.

Waytefee / watch-fee

Historic status: VERIFIED historic feudal burden on specified Watlington/Wormegay knight's-fee holdings; exact later Trussbut/Colts predecessor not identified.

Current legal category: Historic charge tied to medieval knight-service tenure; Tenures Abolition Act 1660 is the relevant abolition/conversion framework.

Current stance:

Evidence: 1329 Thomas Bardolf IPM/calendar material: Wormegay foreign tenants rendered 12d yearly per full knight's fee, called Waytefee; multiple Watlington fee holdings expressly rendered it.

Notes: Track as a historic burden, not as a modern beneficial right.
right_or_incident: Waytefee / watch-fee
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1329 Thomas Bardolf IPM/calendar material: Wormegay foreign tenants rendered 12d yearly per full knight's fee, called Waytefee; multiple Watlington fee holdings expressly rendered it.
historic_status: VERIFIED historic feudal burden on specified Watlington/Wormegay knight's-fee holdings; exact later Trussbut/Colts predecessor not identified.
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 12 first separately tracks Waytefee alongside Castelward. PASS 65 applies the same identity control: multiple distinct 1329 Watlington-linked fee blocks owed the same superior-honour burden, so shared Waytefee/Castelward service cannot by itself prove they were the same subordinate manor or the later Colts/Trusbut fee.
current_legal_category: Historic charge tied to medieval knight-service tenure; Tenures Abolition Act 1660 is the relevant abolition/conversion framework.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: Historic Wormegay/Watlington burden only; no present Watlington-West liability established.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — Wormegay/Watlington predecessor context only
present_claim_assessment: HISTORIC WATLINGTON BURDEN VERIFIED; COLTS LINK UNPROVED; NO CURRENT LIABILITY ESTABLISHED
next_decisive_document: Edward I eleven-membrane Wormegay fee/custom roll; original 1329 IPM membrane; fee-chain comparison through 1403/1427
notes: Track as a historic burden, not as a modern beneficial right.

Superior honour franchises — waifs / strays / soc / toll / team / infangthief

Historic status: VERIFIED at superior Wormegay honour level; not verified as franchises of the subordinate Trussbut/Colts manor.

Current legal category: Historic honour/franchise categories; no present Colts entitlement is evidenced by the superior grant alone.

Current stance:

Evidence: 1441 William Phelipp IPM, E-CIPM 25-481: honour/manor of Wormegay held with escheats, waifs, strays, soc, toll, team (thema), infangthief and other franchises.

Notes: Grouped here to preserve the full 1441 franchise lead without inflating the Colts rights bundle.
right_or_incident: Superior honour franchises — waifs / strays / soc / toll / team / infangthief
earliest_direct_or_best_evidence: 1441 William Phelipp IPM, E-CIPM 25-481: honour/manor of Wormegay held with escheats, waifs, strays, soc, toll, team (thema), infangthief and other franchises.
historic_status: VERIFIED at superior Wormegay honour level; not verified as franchises of the subordinate Trussbut/Colts manor.
key_change_or_survival_event: PASS 12 records the superior franchise ceiling expressly so later sources can be tested for delegation/exercise at the Trussbut submanor.
current_legal_category: Historic honour/franchise categories; no present Colts entitlement is evidenced by the superior grant alone.
current_factual_status_for_watlington_colts: No deed, court record or later conveyance found that grants/exercises these franchises specifically for Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts.
connection_to_colts: UNPROVED — superior honour only
present_claim_assessment: SUPERIOR WORMEGAY FRANCHISE HISTORY ONLY; NO PRESENT COLTS/WATLINGTON-WEST CLAIM
next_decisive_document: 1435-36 Watlington court roll; Edward I Wormegay fee/custom roll; HARE 4056; HARE 2495; Colt/Shouldham conveyances
notes: Grouped here to preserve the full 1441 franchise lead without inflating the Colts rights bundle.

Lordship / manorial title

Historic status: Modern chain accepted for project purposes; rights survival is a separate pre-1930 question.

Current legal category: User-supplied primary conveyance purports to convey Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts, so far as subsisting, with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances.

Current stance: TITLE CHAIN / BENEFIT GATEWAY STRONG; no automatic proof of each individual right.

Evidence: Modern chain accepted for project purposes; rights survival is a separate pre-1930 question.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Lordship / manorial title
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Modern chain accepted for project purposes; rights survival is a separate pre-1930 question.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: HMLR confirms lordship, manorial land and manorial rights can exist separately.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: User-supplied primary conveyance purports to convey Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts, so far as subsisting, with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances.
Current Combined Assessment: TITLE CHAIN / BENEFIT GATEWAY STRONG; no automatic proof of each individual right.
Connection to Colts: Core Colts title stream; keep Gawsels/Davis/Plestow/Coote identity questions record-specific.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Any contrary intention, reservation, severance or extinction before 12 Feb 1930; then modern priority/registration.

12 February 1930 conveyance gateway

Historic status: Prior rights project elevated this as the decisive modern rights bridge.

Current legal category: Express wording: manor/lordship 'as far as the same respectively are subsisting' with 'rights royalties members and appurtenances'.

Current stance: GENERAL RIGHTS PACKAGE EXPRESSLY INCLUDED AS A CLASS; the remaining problem is which specific rights were still legally subsisting.

Evidence: Prior rights project elevated this as the decisive modern rights bridge.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: 12 February 1930 conveyance gateway
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior rights project elevated this as the decisive modern rights bridge.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: LPA 1925 s.62(3) expressly treats compensation rights for extinguished manorial incidents as appertaining to a manor unless contrary intention appears.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Express wording: manor/lordship 'as far as the same respectively are subsisting' with 'rights royalties members and appurtenances'.
Current Combined Assessment: GENERAL RIGHTS PACKAGE EXPRESSLY INCLUDED AS A CLASS; the remaining problem is which specific rights were still legally subsisting.
Connection to Colts: Directly names Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts in the prior primary-instrument analysis.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Full deed clauses: exceptions/reservations, minerals, sporting/game, wastes, rents, fold, franchises, rights of entry, compensation, parcels and recitals.

Manorial land / Colts Farm / capital messuage

Historic status: Physical Colts estate strongly identifiable; later land can be severed from lordship/right package. PASS 51: HARE 2495/HE identifies the capital messuage/Colt's close (6a), four tenements/yards, alder carr (~7a), Appletons (5a) and Batchelors (>9a); early-19C Colt's Farm included the scheduled area and the 1843 tithe preserves Homestall/Further Homestall names.

Current legal category: If a candidate parcel was still legally/reputedly part/member of Watlington Colts and Humphreys had title, the 1930 manor conveyance could potentially carry it under the deed + s.62(3). If already severed, it could not.

Current stance: PHYSICAL ESTATE EVIDENCE VERY STRONG; present ownership unresolved. Pass 51 opens a specific reputed-manor-land recovery route but proves no current parcel.

Evidence: Physical Colts estate strongly identifiable; later land can be severed from lordship/right package. PASS 51: HARE 2495/HE identifies the capital messuage/Colt's close (6a), four tenements/yards, alder carr (~7a), Appletons (5a) and Batchelors (>9a); early-19C Colt's Farm included the scheduled area and the 1843 tithe preserves Homestall/Further Homestall names.

Notes: Priority: Very High
Right / Incident: Manorial land / Colts Farm / capital messuage
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Physical Colts estate strongly identifiable; later land can be severed from lordship/right package. PASS 51: HARE 2495/HE identifies the capital messuage/Colt's close (6a), four tenements/yards, alder carr (~7a), Appletons (5a) and Batchelors (>9a); early-19C Colt's Farm included the scheduled area and the 1843 tithe preserves Homestall/Further Homestall names.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: HARE 5466 keeps Colts Farm visible in Hare estate administration after the reported 1869 title-sale period. PASS 51 legal gate: s.62(3) can carry corporeal/reputed manor land still attached, while Comber/Delacherois confirms a prior distinct freehold conveyance severs it. HARE 5466 may therefore be either continuity of Colts land in Hare ownership or evidence it had already separated from the later lordship.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: If a candidate parcel was still legally/reputedly part/member of Watlington Colts and Humphreys had title, the 1930 manor conveyance could potentially carry it under the deed + s.62(3). If already severed, it could not.
Current Combined Assessment: PHYSICAL ESTATE EVIDENCE VERY STRONG; present ownership unresolved. Pass 51 opens a specific reputed-manor-land recovery route but proves no current parcel.
Connection to Colts: Strong historic Colts physical-estate connection.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Full HARE 2495; HARE 6832; 1843 tithe map/apportionment; HARE 5370 (1849 terrier); full HARE 5466 Colts Farm schedule; Hare physical-estate severance instruments including HARE 6374/6375 + HARE 6956; 16 Dec 1929 Green/Public Trustee -> Humphreys predecessor deed; 12 Feb 1930 manor deed ALREADY RECOVERED/ANALYSED (do not re-search); HMLR index/title history for each reconstructed parcel; NHER 4283 protection agreement.

Free fold / fold liberties

Historic status: Historically the strongest distinctive Colts/Trussbutts right: 1506 free fold; 1597 Colts/Trusbutts title material with fold liberty.

Current legal category: Would pass only if still subsisting and attached/reputedly attached in 1930.

Current stance: HISTORIC RIGHT STRONG; MODERN SURVIVAL UNPROVED / LOOKS WEAK.

Evidence: Historically the strongest distinctive Colts/Trussbutts right: 1506 free fold; 1597 Colts/Trusbutts title material with fold liberty.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Free fold / fold liberties
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Historically the strongest distinctive Colts/Trussbutts right: 1506 free fold; 1597 Colts/Trusbutts title material with fold liberty.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Later enclosure and land reorganisation make survival doubtful; Pass 39 keeps 1506 identity caution visible.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Would pass only if still subsisting and attached/reputedly attached in 1930.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC RIGHT STRONG; MODERN SURVIVAL UNPROVED / LOOKS WEAK.
Connection to Colts: Strongest historic Colts-specific rights candidate, but 1506 identity bridge still matters.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: 1749 Watlington inclosure award/map, later court/custumal evidence, 19th/20th-century severance files.

16 shillings rent

Historic status: Historic 1506 rent proved; legal character unresolved.

Current legal category: Only a still-subsisting legally transferable rent/compensation entitlement could pass.

Current stance: HISTORIC RENT PROVED; PRESENT CLAIM DOWNGRADED UNLESS LATER CHARACTER/CONTINUITY IS FOUND.

Evidence: Historic 1506 rent proved; legal character unresolved.

Notes: Priority: High
Right / Incident: 16 shillings rent
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Historic 1506 rent proved; legal character unresolved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Ordinary quit/customary rents fall on the 1922 extinguishment/compensation side; a legally distinct rentcharge would need separate proof.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Only a still-subsisting legally transferable rent/compensation entitlement could pass.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC RENT PROVED; PRESENT CLAIM DOWNGRADED UNLESS LATER CHARACTER/CONTINUITY IS FOUND.
Connection to Colts: 1506 Watlyngton bundle; Colts identity not automatically assumed.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Later rentals, compensation agreements, 1749 award, proof of independent rentcharge character.

Court baron / customary court

Historic status: Long Watlington court/custom sequence identified; individual manor stream must be proved.

Current legal category: A court-related right could pass only to extent still legally subsisting; extinct jurisdiction is not revived by general words.

Current stance: HISTORIC COURT FUNCTION PROVED; NOT A SAFE PRESENT EXERCISABLE RIGHT WITHOUT SPECIFIC SURVIVAL PROOF.

Evidence: Long Watlington court/custom sequence identified; individual manor stream must be proved.

Notes: Priority: High
Right / Incident: Court baron / customary court
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Long Watlington court/custom sequence identified; individual manor stream must be proved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Gawsels yearly courts leet/baron directly evidenced in 1845 and 1883; ordinary copyhold incidents were transformed by the reforms.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: A court-related right could pass only to extent still legally subsisting; extinct jurisdiction is not revived by general words.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC COURT FUNCTION PROVED; NOT A SAFE PRESENT EXERCISABLE RIGHT WITHOUT SPECIFIC SURVIVAL PROOF.
Connection to Colts: Some Watlington/Gawsels court evidence; generic Watlington records remain stream-sensitive.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Identify last courts/copyholders, statutory effect, compensation schedules and exact manor creator of each court record.

Heriots / fines / reliefs / fealty / suit / admissions

Historic status: Earlier ledger already classified these as ordinary copyhold/manorial incidents rather than serious present-right targets.

Current legal category: Any outstanding compensation entitlement could pass; the extinct incident itself does not revive.

Current stance: HISTORIC INCIDENTS; EXPECT EXTINGUISHMENT/COMPENSATION, NOT PRESENT EXERCISE.

Evidence: Earlier ledger already classified these as ordinary copyhold/manorial incidents rather than serious present-right targets.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Heriots / fines / reliefs / fealty / suit / admissions
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier ledger already classified these as ordinary copyhold/manorial incidents rather than serious present-right targets.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 39 proves arbitrary fines at Gawsels in 1845; Pass 38 maps the 1922 compensation machinery.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Any outstanding compensation entitlement could pass; the extinct incident itself does not revive.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC INCIDENTS; EXPECT EXTINGUISHMENT/COMPENSATION, NOT PRESENT EXERCISE.
Connection to Colts: Gawsels arbitrary fines proved; Colts-specific 1926 status unknown.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: MAF 13/27, manor-specific tenant schedules/agreements, last court/rental records.

Mines / minerals / quarry / working rights

Historic status: Highest-value legally preservable category; no direct Colts mineral reservation previously found.

Current legal category: Would fall within 1930 general rights wording only if still owned/appurtenant/reputedly enjoyed with the manor and not excluded.

Current stance: LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL; NO DIRECT COLTS RESERVATION YET PROVED.

Evidence: Highest-value legally preservable category; no direct Colts mineral reservation previously found.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Mines / minerals / quarry / working rights
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Highest-value legally preservable category; no direct Colts mineral reservation previously found.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: HMLR PG65 confirms mineral ownership/working rights can remain severed from surface and can also be expressly extinguished.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Would fall within 1930 general rights wording only if still owned/appurtenant/reputedly enjoyed with the manor and not excluded.
Current Combined Assessment: LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL; NO DIRECT COLTS RESERVATION YET PROVED.
Connection to Colts: Unproved for Colts; wider estate/enclosure sources may allocate minerals separately.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: 1749 award/map, 1794/98 Shouldham award, 1943 lease, c.1900 exchanges, modern mineral registrations/notices.

Sporting / hunting / shooting / fowling

Historic status: Earlier rights project found the strongest post-1926 factual survivor in the wider estate: Hare Estate sporting reservation.

Current legal category: If a Colts sporting right was still attached to the manor in 1930, the deed wording could carry it; however the 1943 reservation is evidenced in the separate Hare/Stow landowner stream and is not identified as a Colts right.

Current stance: POST-1926 SPORTING RIGHT VERIFIED IN WIDER HARE/STOW ESTATE; COLTS APPURTENANCE UNPROVED.

Evidence: Earlier rights project found the strongest post-1926 factual survivor in the wider estate: Hare Estate sporting reservation.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Sporting / hunting / shooting / fowling
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier rights project found the strongest post-1926 factual survivor in the wider estate: Hare Estate sporting reservation.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Forestry plan states 1943 999-year lease from Hare Estate and sporting rights retained/exercised in Shouldham Sincks; 2022 Norfolk County Council independently states Forestry leased Shouldham Warren from the landowner.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: If a Colts sporting right was still attached to the manor in 1930, the deed wording could carry it; however the 1943 reservation is evidenced in the separate Hare/Stow landowner stream and is not identified as a Colts right.
Current Combined Assessment: POST-1926 SPORTING RIGHT VERIFIED IN WIDER HARE/STOW ESTATE; COLTS APPURTENANCE UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Shouldham/Hare Estate connection real; specific Colts title connection not proved.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Actual 1943 lease; current registered freehold/reversion; HARE 6962-86; c.1900 exchanges; map parcels against Colts Farm.

Warren / chase

Historic status: 1634 Shouldham Warren lease is a genuine rights-bearing historical target; Colts ownership not proved.

Current legal category: Could pass in 1930 only if the relevant franchise/right belonged to Colts and still subsisted.

Current stance: LEGALLY SURVIVABLE CATEGORY; REAL SHOULDHAM WARREN HISTORY; COLTS DEVOLUTION UNPROVED.

Evidence: 1634 Shouldham Warren lease is a genuine rights-bearing historical target; Colts ownership not proved.

Notes: Priority: Very High
Right / Incident: Warren / chase
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: 1634 Shouldham Warren lease is a genuine rights-bearing historical target; Colts ownership not proved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: 1922 regime preserves chase/warren as capable classes; later Hare sporting-right evidence increases importance.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Could pass in 1930 only if the relevant franchise/right belonged to Colts and still subsisted.
Current Combined Assessment: LEGALLY SURVIVABLE CATEGORY; REAL SHOULDHAM WARREN HISTORY; COLTS DEVOLUTION UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Shouldham/Hare stream, not yet Colts.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Recover 1634 lease: lessor, land, franchise wording, successors/assigns, game reservation, later lease chain.

Piscary / fishing

Historic status: Earlier ledger downgraded Domesday fishery as wider Baynard/Shouldham evidence; no continuous Colts piscary proved.

Current legal category: 1930 wording could carry a subsisting piscary, but cannot create or restore one.

Current stance: LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL; NO DIRECT CONTINUOUS COLTS FISHERY PROOF.

Evidence: Earlier ledger downgraded Domesday fishery as wider Baynard/Shouldham evidence; no continuous Colts piscary proved.

Notes: Priority: High
Right / Incident: Piscary / fishing
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier ledger downgraded Domesday fishery as wider Baynard/Shouldham evidence; no continuous Colts piscary proved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: HMLR PG16 confirms a piscary/profit can exist separately from ownership of lake/riverbed.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: 1930 wording could carry a subsisting piscary, but cannot create or restore one.
Current Combined Assessment: LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL; NO DIRECT CONTINUOUS COLTS FISHERY PROOF.
Connection to Colts: Wider Shouldham evidence only at present.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Later deeds/court customs, enclosure award, specific lake/water parcels, fishery grant/reservation, modern title protection.

Market / fair / toll / stallage

Historic status: Shouldham prescriptive market and later fairs are real; franchise ownership stream unresolved.

Current legal category: Could pass only if the franchise belonged to Colts and was still subsisting in 1930.

Current stance: HISTORIC FRANCHISE STREAM EXISTS; COLTS OWNERSHIP / MODERN SURVIVAL UNPROVED.

Evidence: Shouldham prescriptive market and later fairs are real; franchise ownership stream unresolved.

Notes: Priority: High
Right / Incident: Market / fair / toll / stallage
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Shouldham prescriptive market and later fairs are real; franchise ownership stream unresolved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Market/fair franchises are among preserved categories; 1633 'market place' is not ownership proof.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Could pass only if the franchise belonged to Colts and was still subsisting in 1930.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC FRANCHISE STREAM EXISTS; COLTS OWNERSHIP / MODERN SURVIVAL UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Could be Colts, Priory manor or another Shouldham component.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Franchise grants/custom, court/rental receipts, Hare consolidation deeds, later market/fair records.

Commons / wastes / common-related rights

Historic status: Earlier ledger treats these as heavily transformed by enclosure.

Current legal category: Only residual waste/common rights surviving those awards could reach 1930.

Current stance: SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON ENCLOSURE AWARDS / ALLOTMENTS / RESERVATIONS.

Evidence: Earlier ledger treats these as heavily transformed by enclosure.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Commons / wastes / common-related rights
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier ledger treats these as heavily transformed by enclosure.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: 1749 Watlington inclosure and 1794–98 Shouldham enclosure are separate decisive transformation regimes.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Only residual waste/common rights surviving those awards could reach 1930.
Current Combined Assessment: SURVIVAL DEPENDS ON ENCLOSURE AWARDS / ALLOTMENTS / RESERVATIONS.
Connection to Colts: Territory-based tracing required; do not merge by manor label alone.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Full 1749 Watlington Act/award/map/claims; 1794–98 Shouldham award/map; later exchanges.

Roads / ways / dykes / drains / protective works

Historic status: Certain obligations/rights are legally preservable; actual Colts basis unproved.

Current legal category: Only a specific subsisting right/liability would pass in 1930.

Current stance: LEGAL CAPACITY EXISTS; FACTUAL COLTS RIGHT/LIABILITY UNPROVED.

Evidence: Certain obligations/rights are legally preservable; actual Colts basis unproved.

Notes: Priority: Medium-High
Right / Incident: Roads / ways / dykes / drains / protective works
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Certain obligations/rights are legally preservable; actual Colts basis unproved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: LPA 1922 Schedule 12 preserves certain works liabilities; enclosure likely reorganised roads/drains.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Only a specific subsisting right/liability would pass in 1930.
Current Combined Assessment: LEGAL CAPACITY EXISTS; FACTUAL COLTS RIGHT/LIABILITY UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Territory/parcel dependent.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: 1749/1798 awards, commissioners' papers, later drainage/highway instruments.

Timber

Historic status: Earlier ledger treated timber separately from minerals/sporting rights.

Current legal category: 1930 passage depends on whether it was a surviving appurtenant right versus land ownership or an extinguished incident.

Current stance: NO SIMPLE PRESENT MANORIAL TIMBER RIGHT PROVED.

Evidence: Earlier ledger treated timber separately from minerals/sporting rights.

Notes: Priority: High
Right / Incident: Timber
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier ledger treated timber separately from minerals/sporting rights.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 38 identifies timber-related incidents within extinguishment/compensation framework; physical timber ownership can also follow land.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: 1930 passage depends on whether it was a surviving appurtenant right versus land ownership or an extinguished incident.
Current Combined Assessment: NO SIMPLE PRESENT MANORIAL TIMBER RIGHT PROVED.
Connection to Colts: Parcel/right character must be established.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Enfranchisement/compensation agreements, estate deeds, 1749/1798 awards, 1943 lease.

Advowson / St Peter patronage

Historic status: Historic 1506 advowson strong, but later patronage stream was separately owned and modern church law governs transfer.

Current legal category: 1930 general words do not restore a severed ecclesiastical patronage right.

Current stance: HISTORIC ADVOWSON PROVED; SEPARATE PATRONAGE STREAM; NOT A CURRENT MANOR-SALE RIGHT.

Evidence: Historic 1506 advowson strong, but later patronage stream was separately owned and modern church law governs transfer.

Notes: Priority: Medium
Right / Incident: Advowson / St Peter patronage
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Historic 1506 advowson strong, but later patronage stream was separately owned and modern church law governs transfer.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 40 separation principles reinforce that a historical appurtenance may have been severed long before modern title transfer.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: 1930 general words do not restore a severed ecclesiastical patronage right.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC ADVOWSON PROVED; SEPARATE PATRONAGE STREAM; NOT A CURRENT MANOR-SALE RIGHT.
Connection to Colts: 1506 working Watlyngton bundle; later Colts identity/devolution unresolved.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Diocesan patronage register and historic presentation deeds.

Castleward / waytefee / superior honour franchises

Historic status: Historic Watlington/Wormegay burdens and superior franchises proved in medieval records, but not Colts present rights.

Current legal category: Not rescued by 1930 general words if already abolished, superior-only, or never Colts rights.

Current stance: HISTORICAL CONTEXT / BURDENS ONLY; NO PRESENT COLTS CLAIM.

Evidence: Historic Watlington/Wormegay burdens and superior franchises proved in medieval records, but not Colts present rights.

Notes: Priority: Low
Right / Incident: Castleward / waytefee / superior honour franchises
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Historic Watlington/Wormegay burdens and superior franchises proved in medieval records, but not Colts present rights.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Tenures Abolition Act 1660 / superior-honour structure remain controlling transformation context.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Not rescued by 1930 general words if already abolished, superior-only, or never Colts rights.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORICAL CONTEXT / BURDENS ONLY; NO PRESENT COLTS CLAIM.
Connection to Colts: Wormegay/Watlington predecessor or superior honour, not proved as Colts beneficial right.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Original fee/custom rolls, delegation/exercise evidence, chain-specific proof.

Mill / salthouse / early Baynard resources

Historic status: Earlier audit downgraded these as wider Baynard/Shouldham resource evidence, not Colts.

Current legal category: Could not pass as Colts rights in 1930 without an intervening Colts-specific chain.

Current stance: WIDER SHOULDHAM/BAYNARD LEADS ONLY; DO NOT PRESENT AS COLTS RIGHTS.

Evidence: Earlier audit downgraded these as wider Baynard/Shouldham resource evidence, not Colts.

Notes: Priority: Low
Right / Incident: Mill / salthouse / early Baynard resources
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier audit downgraded these as wider Baynard/Shouldham resource evidence, not Colts.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Current separation rules confirm physical/economic resources do not become modern manorial rights merely from early estate association.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Could not pass as Colts rights in 1930 without an intervening Colts-specific chain.
Current Combined Assessment: WIDER SHOULDHAM/BAYNARD LEADS ONLY; DO NOT PRESENT AS COLTS RIGHTS.
Connection to Colts: No direct Colts bridge.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Bridge estate/resource into Trussbutts/Colts through deeds/rentals/courts.

1597 Colt -> Shouldham title anchor (HARE 2402)

Historic status: Prior rights project established actual bargain and sale expressly naming Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes.

Current legal category: Shows the named Colts/Trusbutts manor identity in an operative assurance well before the 1930 gateway.

Current stance: DIRECT HISTORIC TITLE IDENTITY STRONG.

Evidence: Prior rights project established actual bargain and sale expressly naming Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: 1597 Colt -> Shouldham title anchor (HARE 2402)
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior rights project established actual bargain and sale expressly naming Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Current main ledger now carries the exact NRO reference and scope.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Shows the named Colts/Trusbutts manor identity in an operative assurance well before the 1930 gateway.
Current Combined Assessment: DIRECT HISTORIC TITLE IDENTITY STRONG.
Connection to Colts: Direct Colts/Trusbutts wording.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Original HARE 2402 scan/full transcription, including reservations and appurtenances.

1597 fold liberty (HARE 2403)

Historic status: Prior rights project materially upgraded fold history beyond the 1506 generic Watlyngton free fold.

Current legal category: A fold liberty can reach the 1930 general words only if it survived the 1749 inclosure and later estate changes.

Current stance: HISTORIC FOLD LIBERTY NOW TIED TO 1597 WATLYNGTON/COLTES TITLE PACKAGE; SURVIVAL STILL UNPROVED.

Evidence: Prior rights project materially upgraded fold history beyond the 1506 generic Watlyngton free fold.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: 1597 fold liberty (HARE 2403)
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior rights project materially upgraded fold history beyond the 1506 generic Watlyngton free fold.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Current main ledger now carries the NRO title-exemplification record.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: A fold liberty can reach the 1930 general words only if it survived the 1749 inclosure and later estate changes.
Current Combined Assessment: HISTORIC FOLD LIBERTY NOW TIED TO 1597 WATLYNGTON/COLTES TITLE PACKAGE; SURVIVAL STILL UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Strong Colts-title connection; exact allocation across several places requires original.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: HARE 2403 original + full 1749 award/map + later parcel/severance records.

1749 Watlington inclosure award extract (MS 7245, 7B4)

Historic status: Earlier project located an exact surviving award fragment rather than merely the Act title.

Current legal category: The inclosure is the principal transformation gate for fold, commons/waste, roads/drains and possible mineral reservations before 1930.

Current stance: AWARD FRAGMENT EXISTS; FULL RIGHTS EFFECT STILL UNREAD.

Evidence: Earlier project located an exact surviving award fragment rather than merely the Act title.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: 1749 Watlington inclosure award extract (MS 7245, 7B4)
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier project located an exact surviving award fragment rather than merely the Act title.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 42 confirms the Act's statutory existence and restores the NRO extract into the main ledger.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: The inclosure is the principal transformation gate for fold, commons/waste, roads/drains and possible mineral reservations before 1930.
Current Combined Assessment: AWARD FRAGMENT EXISTS; FULL RIGHTS EFFECT STILL UNREAD.
Connection to Colts: Watlington parish/manor; precise manor stream of Elizabeth Roberts allotment unknown.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Order MS 7245, 7B4 and trace its parent award/map/claims/commissioners' papers.

16 Dec 1929 predecessor conveyance

Historic status: Earlier private deed analysis exposed this recited root immediately before Humphreys -> Edleston.

Current legal category: It may contain the immediate pre-1930 reservations/severances defining what Humphreys could convey.

Current stance: CRITICAL MISSING PREDECESSOR INSTRUMENT.

Evidence: Earlier private deed analysis exposed this recited root immediately before Humphreys -> Edleston.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: 16 Dec 1929 predecessor conveyance
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier private deed analysis exposed this recited root immediately before Humphreys -> Edleston.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 42 restores it to the current title chain.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: It may contain the immediate pre-1930 reservations/severances defining what Humphreys could convey.
Current Combined Assessment: CRITICAL MISSING PREDECESSOR INSTRUMENT.
Connection to Colts: Directly recited in 12 Feb 1930 deed affecting the conveyed hereditaments.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Obtain full Green + Public Trustee -> Humphreys deed and schedule.

21 Dec 1977 two-deed vesting sequence

Historic status: Prior project had primary deed proof; current ledger had only chronology/secondary material.

Current legal category: First deed expressly schedules Watlington Colts/Trusbutts into Eric's executor capacity; second sweeps residual Sarah-estate lordships to Richard.

Current stance: MODERN BENEFIT-SIDE CHAIN SUBSTANTIALLY PRIMARY-PROVED TO RICHARD.

Evidence: Prior project had primary deed proof; current ledger had only chronology/secondary material.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: 21 Dec 1977 two-deed vesting sequence
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior project had primary deed proof; current ledger had only chronology/secondary material.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 42 restores both deeds separately.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: First deed expressly schedules Watlington Colts/Trusbutts into Eric's executor capacity; second sweeps residual Sarah-estate lordships to Richard.
Current Combined Assessment: MODERN BENEFIT-SIDE CHAIN SUBSTANTIALLY PRIMARY-PROVED TO RICHARD.
Connection to Colts: Watlington Colts expressly named in first deed; second is residual sweep.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Inspect 30 Oct 1969 assent; then Richard's will/Olivia assent/current transfer.

Shouldham Woods freehold/reversion vs Forestry lease

Historic status: Earlier project had the 1943 sporting-right reservation but did not fully state the tenure consequence.

Current legal category: This proves a separate superior-landowner/leaseholder structure. [Inference] The superior/reversionary estate remains outside Forestry unless later transferred, but the exact legal proprietor must come from the lease/HMLR. No evidence ties that superior estate to the Watlington-Colts lordship.

Current stance: LEASEHOLD STRUCTURE STRONGLY PROVED; CURRENT REGISTERED FREEHOLDER AND COLTS CONNECTION UNPROVED.

Evidence: Earlier project had the 1943 sporting-right reservation but did not fully state the tenure consequence.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Shouldham Woods freehold/reversion vs Forestry lease
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier project had the 1943 sporting-right reservation but did not fully state the tenure consequence.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Forestry England currently says Shouldham is leasehold; its plan says the 999-year Hare Estate lease began in 1943; Norfolk County Council independently says Forestry leased Warren from the landowner. Only West Bilney is Forestry freehold.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: This proves a separate superior-landowner/leaseholder structure. [Inference] The superior/reversionary estate remains outside Forestry unless later transferred, but the exact legal proprietor must come from the lease/HMLR. No evidence ties that superior estate to the Watlington-Colts lordship.
Current Combined Assessment: LEASEHOLD STRUCTURE STRONGLY PROVED; CURRENT REGISTERED FREEHOLDER AND COLTS CONNECTION UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Hare/Stow estate, not automatically Watlington Colts.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Actual 1943 lease; current freehold/reversion and leasehold registers/title plans; HARE 6962-86/new Hare archive; compare parcels against Colts Farm.

Shouldham Sincks ownership

Historic status: Earlier project knew Sincks as a sporting-right exercise area.

Current legal category: Any 1930 Colts right over Sincks would therefore need an independent chain as a burden/profit over land in the Stow estate stream; title ownership alone is insufficient.

Current stance: PUBLIC OWNER STATEMENT EXISTS FOR SINCKS; REGISTERED PROPRIETOR/ENTITY AND COLTS CONNECTION UNPROVED.

Evidence: Earlier project knew Sincks as a sporting-right exercise area.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Shouldham Sincks ownership
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier project knew Sincks as a sporting-right exercise area.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Shouldham Parish Council in 2021 expressly says Shouldham Sincks is owned by Stow Estates; Forestry's plan treats Sincks as part of the 372ha lease and says estate sporting rights are exercised there.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Any 1930 Colts right over Sincks would therefore need an independent chain as a burden/profit over land in the Stow estate stream; title ownership alone is insufficient.
Current Combined Assessment: PUBLIC OWNER STATEMENT EXISTS FOR SINCKS; REGISTERED PROPRIETOR/ENTITY AND COLTS CONNECTION UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Stow estate land stream.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: HMLR freehold register/title plan; actual 1943 lease; identify Stow Estates legal entity; historic parcel mapping.

Shouldham minerals / silica sand

Historic status: Minerals were already identified as the highest-value legally preservable category, but no Colts reservation was found.

Current legal category: Physical mineral existence makes the title question commercially/materially real, but the 1930 general words only carry minerals if they were then attached and not severed/reserved.

Current stance: RESOURCE EXISTS PHYSICALLY; OWNERSHIP OF MINERAL ESTATE REMAINS UNPROVED.

Evidence: Minerals were already identified as the highest-value legally preservable category, but no Colts reservation was found.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Shouldham minerals / silica sand
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Minerals were already identified as the highest-value legally preservable category, but no Colts reservation was found.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: BGS confirms extractable Leziate sands at Shouldham Warren/Sincks and historic working; Norfolk planning identifies the area as mineral-search territory.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Physical mineral existence makes the title question commercially/materially real, but the 1930 general words only carry minerals if they were then attached and not severed/reserved.
Current Combined Assessment: RESOURCE EXISTS PHYSICALLY; OWNERSHIP OF MINERAL ESTATE REMAINS UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Location overlaps wider Shouldham/Hare-Stow estate environment; Colts parcel connection still requires mapping.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: 1749/1798 awards; HARE 6374/6375/6956; 1943 lease mineral reservations; current mineral title/notices and operator agreements.

Late-19th-century Stow ownership of Shouldham Woods

Historic status: Earlier rights work showed modern Hare/Stow sporting-right survival but the pre-1943 land ownership anchor was less explicit.

Current legal category: Confirms the woodland freehold/estate stream existed independently before the 1930 Colts title conveyance.

Current stance: PHYSICAL SHOULDHAM WOODLAND OWNERSHIP IN STOW/HARE STREAM STRONGLY PROVED BEFORE 1930.

Evidence: Earlier rights work showed modern Hare/Stow sporting-right survival but the pre-1943 land ownership anchor was less explicit.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Late-19th-century Stow ownership of Shouldham Woods
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier rights work showed modern Hare/Stow sporting-right survival but the pre-1943 land ownership anchor was less explicit.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Forestry England now directly states that by the late 19th century the Stow Bardolph Estate owned Shouldham Woods.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Confirms the woodland freehold/estate stream existed independently before the 1930 Colts title conveyance.
Current Combined Assessment: PHYSICAL SHOULDHAM WOODLAND OWNERSHIP IN STOW/HARE STREAM STRONGLY PROVED BEFORE 1930.
Connection to Colts: Wider estate; no deed currently reconnects it to Colts.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Tithe/OS/HARE estate deeds and c.1900 exchange papers.

c.1900 Hare ↔ Hoff exchange

Historic status: Legacy project already flagged HARE 6374/6375 as a possible severance point.

Current legal category: Could identify precisely which Shouldham/Thorpe parcels left the Hare estate before Humphreys/Edleston acquired the title package.

Current stance: CONCRETE PRE-1930 PARCEL-SEVERANCE EVENT; DETAILS UNREAD.

Evidence: Legacy project already flagged HARE 6374/6375 as a possible severance point.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: c.1900 Hare ↔ Hoff exchange
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Legacy project already flagged HARE 6374/6375 as a possible severance point.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 44 promotes the exact HARE 6956/1-5 marked OS sheets into the main ledger.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Could identify precisely which Shouldham/Thorpe parcels left the Hare estate before Humphreys/Edleston acquired the title package.
Current Combined Assessment: CONCRETE PRE-1930 PARCEL-SEVERANCE EVENT; DETAILS UNREAD.
Connection to Colts: Potential Colts Farm/Shouldham relevance requires map matching.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: HARE 6374-5 + HARE 6956/1-5 originals.

2010 Stow Estate physical/sporting continuity

Historic status: Prior legacy analysis noted a modern shooting-estate stream.

Current legal category: Strongly supports persistence of separate estate land and sporting interests long after the 1930 title conveyance.

Current stance: MODERN WIDER-ESTATE LAND/SPORTING STREAM STRONG.

Evidence: Prior legacy analysis noted a modern shooting-estate stream.

Notes: Priority: Very High
Right / Incident: 2010 Stow Estate physical/sporting continuity
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior legacy analysis noted a modern shooting-estate stream.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Official council report records Hare family's Stow Estate as traditional farming and shooting estate, c.4,000 acres in 2010.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Strongly supports persistence of separate estate land and sporting interests long after the 1930 title conveyance.
Current Combined Assessment: MODERN WIDER-ESTATE LAND/SPORTING STREAM STRONG.
Connection to Colts: No Colts appurtenance proved.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Land Registry titles; estate trust/title documents; actual 1943 lease.

Land severance does not itself decide rights

Historic status: Earlier project separated lordship, land and individual rights but some summaries risked implying retained rights automatically follow severance.

Current legal category: For each land sale/exchange/lease, the deed determines whether sporting/mineral/piscary/warren/timber rights were retained or transferred.

Current stance: NO AUTOMATIC PRESUMPTION THAT RIGHTS REMAINED WITH THE LORD WHEN LAND WAS SEVERED.

Evidence: Earlier project separated lordship, land and individual rights but some summaries risked implying retained rights automatically follow severance.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Land severance does not itself decide rights
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier project separated lordship, land and individual rights but some summaries risked implying retained rights automatically follow severance.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 45 adds a local 1845 control: Hare could be chief owner/lord in Shouldham Thorpe while Fodderston freehold belonged to Ely and was only leased to him with tithes.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: For each land sale/exchange/lease, the deed determines whether sporting/mineral/piscary/warren/timber rights were retained or transferred.
Current Combined Assessment: NO AUTOMATIC PRESUMPTION THAT RIGHTS REMAINED WITH THE LORD WHEN LAND WAS SEVERED.
Connection to Colts: Applies directly to interpreting Hare/Hoff c.1900 and Hare→Forestry 1943.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: HARE 6374/6375/6956; actual 1943 lease; registered titles; reservations/exceptions.

1845 Hare rabbit-warren landholding

Historic status: Warren history was previously a real Shouldham lead but specific Colts franchise continuity remained unproved.

Current legal category: Shows estate ownership/management of warren land; does not by itself prove a separately retained free-warren franchise.

Current stance: HARE ESTATE WARREN LAND / MANAGEMENT STRONG; COLTS INCORPOREAL WARREN RIGHT STILL UNPROVED.

Evidence: Warren history was previously a real Shouldham lead but specific Colts franchise continuity remained unproved.

Notes: Priority: Very High
Right / Incident: 1845 Hare rabbit-warren landholding
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Warren history was previously a real Shouldham lead but specific Colts franchise continuity remained unproved.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: White 1845 says Hare's 2,674 acres included a rabbit warren and names William Brighton as warrener.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Shows estate ownership/management of warren land; does not by itself prove a separately retained free-warren franchise.
Current Combined Assessment: HARE ESTATE WARREN LAND / MANAGEMENT STRONG; COLTS INCORPOREAL WARREN RIGHT STILL UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Shouldham/Hare estate.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: 1634 warren lease; 1798 enclosure; later shooting leases; 1943 lease reservations.

1779-1780 Shouldham gamekeeping enforcement

Historic status: Prior work proved warren management and later sporting-right reservation but had less direct evidence of actual eighteenth-century game enforcement.

Current legal category: Strengthens historic sporting/game control in the wider Shouldham manor/estate stream but still does not establish Colts-specific appurtenance.

Current stance: ACTIVE HISTORIC GAME CONTROL STRONGLY INDICATED; COLTS IDENTITY UNPROVED.

Evidence: Prior work proved warren management and later sporting-right reservation but had less direct evidence of actual eighteenth-century game enforcement.

Notes: Priority: Very High
Right / Incident: 1779-1780 Shouldham gamekeeping enforcement
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Prior work proved warren management and later sporting-right reservation but had less direct evidence of actual eighteenth-century game enforcement.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Joseph Forby is reported as appointed gamekeeper of Sir Thomas Hare's manor at Shouldham; ensuing legal case concerns seizure of guns on the property.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Strengthens historic sporting/game control in the wider Shouldham manor/estate stream but still does not establish Colts-specific appurtenance.
Current Combined Assessment: ACTIVE HISTORIC GAME CONTROL STRONGLY INDICATED; COLTS IDENTITY UNPROVED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Hare/Shouldham.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Underlying Wentworth pleading; gamekeeper appointment/estate records; manor-specific court or shooting leases.

Extraction and resource rights are beneficiary-specific

Historic status: Earlier minerals/common analysis already separated legal categories.

Current legal category: Shows that extractive/resource entitlements were beneficiary- and parcel-specific; the poor-allotment stream cannot be converted into a lord's mineral right, and Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe allotments must remain separate.

Current stance: FUEL-ALLOTMENT ORIGIN PROVED (1794); RESOURCE USE PROVED; LORD'S PROPRIETARY RIGHT NOT IMPLIED.

Evidence: Earlier minerals/common analysis already separated legal categories.

Notes: Priority: High
Right / Incident: Extraction and resource rights are beneficiary-specific
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier minerals/common analysis already separated legal categories.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 46 added nine acres of digging ground and a fuel allotment where poor cut peat. Pass 47 fixes the fuel-allotment origin: Charity Commission identifies the 1794 Inclosure Award (P.R. 29.(1) p.520), while White 1845 gives a separate 95-acre Shouldham allotment and a 60-acre Shouldham Thorpe allotment.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Shows that extractive/resource entitlements were beneficiary- and parcel-specific; the poor-allotment stream cannot be converted into a lord's mineral right, and Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe allotments must remain separate.
Current Combined Assessment: FUEL-ALLOTMENT ORIGIN PROVED (1794); RESOURCE USE PROVED; LORD'S PROPRIETARY RIGHT NOT IMPLIED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Shouldham/Hare landscape.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Full 1794 Shouldham award P.R. 29.(1) p.520; full Shouldham Thorpe award; parcel maps; later charity schemes/title.

1943 Forestry Commission operational anchor

Historic status: Earlier official Forest Plan evidence stated that Shouldham Woods management began in 1943 under a 999-year lease from the Hare Estate.

Current legal category: Independently corroborates the 1943 transition into Forestry Commission administration without supplying the lease's proprietary/reservation clauses.

Current stance: PRIMARY ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENCE PROVED BY SEP 1943; ACTUAL LEASE TERMS STILL UNREAD.

Evidence: Earlier official Forest Plan evidence stated that Shouldham Woods management began in 1943 under a 999-year lease from the Hare Estate.

Notes: Priority: Very High
Right / Incident: 1943 Forestry Commission operational anchor
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Earlier official Forest Plan evidence stated that Shouldham Woods management began in 1943 under a 999-year lease from the Hare Estate.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 47 adds a contemporary Forestry Commission administrative source: the Twenty-Fourth Annual Report lists '140. Shouldham, Norfolk' among Commission units for the year ending 30 September 1943.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Independently corroborates the 1943 transition into Forestry Commission administration without supplying the lease's proprietary/reservation clauses.
Current Combined Assessment: PRIMARY ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENCE PROVED BY SEP 1943; ACTUAL LEASE TERMS STILL UNREAD.
Connection to Colts: Wider Hare/Stow Shouldham Woods land stream; Colts appurtenance still unproved.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: Actual 1943 lease; Forestry estate/acquisition file; registered freehold/leasehold titles; later variations.

Forestry unit acreage is not title/lease acreage

Historic status: Pass 49 identified a 1,290-acre Shouldham Forestry unit in 1959 and a modern 372ha Shouldham leasehold plan, leaving an apparent size discrepancy.

Current legal category: Administrative/operational forest acreage can change through acquisition, regrouping, disposal or re-survey without proving a corresponding change in the original 1943 legal demise.

Current stance: CORRECTION: DO NOT USE 1,290 ACRES VS 372HA AS DIRECT PROOF THAT THE SHOULDHAM LEASE WAS PARTLY SURRENDERED OR SEVERED.

Evidence: Pass 49 identified a 1,290-acre Shouldham Forestry unit in 1959 and a modern 372ha Shouldham leasehold plan, leaving an apparent size discrepancy.

Notes: Priority: Critical
Right / Incident: Forestry unit acreage is not title/lease acreage
Earlier Rights-Ledger Conclusion: Pass 49 identified a 1,290-acre Shouldham Forestry unit in 1959 and a modern 372ha Shouldham leasehold plan, leaving an apparent size discrepancy.
Newer Pass 38–40 Evidence: Pass 50 adds the missing chronology: 1953 Shouldham was 956 acres; 1954 it rose to 1,290; 1960 the Commission expressly amalgamated Gaywood and Shouldham as Lynn Forest; later reports still call the site 'Lynn Forest, Shouldham'.
12 Feb 1930 Gateway Effect: Administrative/operational forest acreage can change through acquisition, regrouping, disposal or re-survey without proving a corresponding change in the original 1943 legal demise.
Current Combined Assessment: CORRECTION: DO NOT USE 1,290 ACRES VS 372HA AS DIRECT PROOF THAT THE SHOULDHAM LEASE WAS PARTLY SURRENDERED OR SEVERED.
Connection to Colts: Wider Forestry/Hare-Stow land stream; no Colts appurtenance proved.
What Would Prove / Disprove Survival: F37 Lynn/Shouldham/Gaywood working plans; 1953-54 estate/acquisition files; 1943 lease and later variations; HMLR titles.

Sources & downloadable records (233)
Watlyngton final concord abstract · CP 25/1/170/197 no.106

Manor, acreage, 16s rent, one free fold, St Peter advowson; parties now recorded in Pass 3

Original final-concord membrane image · CP 25/1/170/197 no.106

Original membrane for 1506 Watlyngton fine

Norfolk Archaeology volume containing Watlington/Shuldham pedigree and Trussbut deeds

Title pedigree and medieval muniments linking Shuldham/Trussbut holdings

1851 Hare estate map derivative · HARE 5186, 231x2

Plan of Stow Hall estate parishes including Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe

1798 schedule of allotments, roads, drain, fences, rules/orders · Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe enclosure

1798 Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe schedule covering public/private allotments, public/private/bridle roads, footpaths, drain, fences, rules/orders.

Colt's Hall / manor site official listing · HARE 2495; HARE 6832

Official heritage summary identifies NRO HARE 2495 field book (1633), a separately identifiable Colt's/Trussbutt's estate, and the George Colt -> Thomas Shouldham -> Gawdy sequence.

Watlington Colts / Trusbutts auction title history

Secondary source-finder for 1581/1596 and later descent only. PASS 10 shows its Domesday Watlington-Colts paragraph cannot be treated as one Domesday entry: the £2 valuation and mill/fishery/two-church package map to different Baynard/Shouldham evidence.

Norfolk Record Office catalogue root · HARE collection

Primary route to HARE references and court books

Manorial documents accessions digest · ACC 2002/145

Lead for Tittleshall alias Trusbutts court book

Practice Guide 22: Manors

HMLR separates lordship title, manorial land and manorial rights; title may exist without land/rights. Main potentially surviving modern rights include sporting, mines/minerals, fairs/markets and certain works liabilities. Explains post-2013 priority consequences.

Practice Guide 66: overriding interests and 2013

Controls the survival shortlist: minerals/quarries/working rights, fairs/markets, chase/warren, piscaries, sporting rights and specified works liabilities.

Practice Guide 13: index of franchises and manors

Current HMLR procedure for searching registered manors and relating franchises. Search uses SIF by administrative area; certificate reveals relevant title numbers/types of registration.

Thomas Duke of Exeter IPM — full edited record · E-CIPM 22-791; TNA C 139/30/56 mm.13,15

1427 Wormegay fee list: Thomas Trusbut and parceners hold the main multi-place Watlington fee; Robert Kervyle holds the separate Watlington quarter-fee.

Norfolk section: Thomas Trusbut and parceners / Robert Kervyle · E-CIPM 22-791; TNA C 139/30/56 mm.13,15

1427 Wormegay fee list: Thomas Trusbut and parceners hold the main multi-place Watlington fee; Robert Kervyle holds the separate Watlington quarter-fee.

Godbould family-history PDF with NRO deed abstracts · HARE 3080/7; 975; 2719; 979; unidentified 1611 item

Adds specific NRO references and 1611 'Tittishall...Trusbutes' deed wording

Notes and Queries 1867 — Shouldham-area deeds/court-roll report

Reports Gawsells Manor and West Dereham Abbey courts in Watlington and 'many thousand' deeds/court rolls

Royal Holloway thesis discussing John Trussbut, mercer, with Norfolk estates · TNA PROB 11/3

Concrete TNA probate piece for John Trussbut d.1439

Rabbit Warrens article — Shouldham Warren lease

Confirms 1634 Shouldham Warren lease as real source target and rabbit-supply stipulation

Shouldham and Bilney Forest Plan

Official plan: leasehold Shouldham Woods; landowner permits access; sporting rights retained by the estate and exercised in the Sincks; private-house access plus powerline/gas wayleaves.

Clackclose hundred hearth-tax record details · E 179/253/45

Geographic footprint includes Shouldham, Shouldham Thorpe, Wallington, Thorpland, Runcton Holme and Watlington

Watlington, Norfolk GENUKI locality page

Supports Watlington Norfolk inclosure source trail

Shouldham Conservation Area leaflet

Official conservation history records nine acres of open-chalk 'digging ground' in south-east Shouldham feeding a lime kiln; also records Hare ownership of 65% of open-field strips and post-enclosure Warren survival.

Military Pardons database PDF

Nicholas Trusbut of Shouldham person/place evidence

Stewardship of the Liberty of the Eight and a Half Hundreds

Laurence Trusbut administrative/person context

Bardolf IPM calendar reproduction — Laurence Trussebut in Watlington-containing fee · CIPM vol. XVI no.814 (underlying membrane to identify)

Major Wormegay/Bardolf source-finder. PASS 12: records the 19 July 1254 free-warren charter expressly including Watlington; reproduces 1329 Watlington fee holdings charged with Castelward/Waytefee; and reproduces 1403 Laurence Trussebute holding both the main one-fee and a separate Watlington quarter-fee.

Agnes Bardolf Norfolk IPM — Laurence Trussebute Watlington fees · E-CIPM 18-793; TNA C 137/37/39; E 149/81/3

1403 Agnes Bardolf IPM: Laurence Trussebute and others hold BOTH the main Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey/Shouldham Thorpe/Langham one-fee and a separate Watlington quarter-fee.

Miles de Stapilton IPM — 1397 feoffment naming Laurence Trussebut · E-CIPM 21-250; TNA C 138/39/47; E 149/115/6

1397 charter names Laurence Trussebut; 1419 list of surviving feoffees omits him, consistent with scholarly death-before-1418 chronology

Bishop's Lynn IPM jury naming Thomas Shuldham and Thomas Trussebut · E-CIPM 25-95

Thomas Shuldham and Thomas Trussebut appear together on a Norfolk jury in 1438

Thomas Trussebut of Lynn biography

Franchise 1385; merchant and shipowner; rural real estate; removed as coroner 1441 for old age/infirmity

Laurence Trussebut of Shouldham — administrative career and family-network discussion

Shouldham identity, JP/Lynn justice/bishop's steward/estate manager; 1386 Trussebut estate additions; dead by Easter 1418 per scholarship

Lidgate manor court roll written by Laurence Trussebut · Quaritch Catalogue 1434 item 82

Documents Laurence's active manorial-court administration; photograph of original roll

Runcton Holme lease to Laurence Trussebut — lands, tenements, rents and tithes · Christ's College Muniments inventory item 53(1)

Surviving physical muniment; 60-year Runcton Holme lease at 20s p.a. to Laurence ?Trussebut

Christ's College Archives access and contact page

Provides route to request the Runcton Holme Trussebut muniment

Part of extent of ?Shouldham / Fincham / Runcton Holme from Hare MSS · ACC 2022/153

Potentially crucial extent covering the Trusbut/Colt-to-1506 transition period

Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall court book · ACC 2002/145

Confirms court book and accession-level identifier

Hare estate schedules expressly listing Colts Farm in Shouldham · Hare 5466, 222 x 5

Post-1874 Hare Estate schedules separately name Colts Farm in Shouldham and Shouldham Abbey Farm. PASS 19 pairs this with White 1845's separate warrener, Abbey Farm farmer and Colts Hall farmer; critical for allocating Warren/mineral/sporting rights to the correct estate unit. PASS 24 catalogue upgrade: exact title records a tenancy agreement dated 3 Oct 1871, Sir Thomas Hare with James Pollard, miller of Wisbech St Peter, re windmill in Shouldham Thorpe, with papers enclosed; same package enumerates Colts Farm, Shouldham Abbey Farm and other distinct estate units. PASS 25: post-1874 presence of Colts Farm in the Hare package is now central evidence for possible separation between the incorporeal lordship and retained physical Colts freehold.

Whose was the Fifteenth-century Manor Court? — Appendix of exact NRO references · DOI 10.1515/jbwg-2026-0005

Peer-reviewed appendix gives exact NRO references: Dersingham Shouldham Court Rolls 1495-1509 = WAL 1058, 285x2; Dersingham Shouldham Rental 1499/1500 = PD 603/197. Useful primarily for stream separation/comparison, not as Colts evidence.

KCL repository page for Gibbs manor-court article

Institutional access route to accepted manuscript

Gibbs accepted manuscript direct file

Download route for exact manuscript-source appendix

Gibbs article download mirror

Alternative download route exposing manuscript source list

Sir Nicholas Bacon Collection of English Court and Manorial Documents · Sir Nicholas Bacon Collection, multiple MSS incl. 1454, 4383, 4384, 898

Includes 'Value of Sir William Butts lands', marriage/estate papers and 1562 Sir William Butts sheriff quietus

The Visitation of Suffolke — Internet Archive item

Primary heraldic-pedigree source target for Thomas Colt + Jane/Thursbotte wording

The Visitation of Suffolke direct PDF

Physical download route for checking Colt/Thursbotte pedigree wording

Thomas Colt / Johanna Trusbut secondary pedigree

Calls Johanna daughter of John Trusbut; useful source-finder for Jane/Johanna question

Colt of Colt's Hall / Netherhall pedigree

Styles Johanna Trusbut as daughter of John Trusbut of Runcton Holme

Watlington manor — roll of court baron and customary court · 14 Hen VI; modern shelfmark unresolved

Direct evidence that a Watlington court baron/customary court roll existed for 14 Hen VI; potential proof of actual manor customs

Draft Court Roll of Manor of Watlington in Norfolk · GB 160 SL26/6

Court roll only six years after 1506 fine; potentially tests free fold, rents, customary tenure and other actual rights

Practice Guide 65 — Registration of mines and minerals · PG65

Explains copyhold mineral custom, preservation on enfranchisement, possible extinguishment and proof of separate mineral title

Practice Guide 18 — Franchises · PG18

Market/fair franchises require grant or prescription and proof of devolution; separate from physical land

Law of Property Act 1922 · 12 & 13 Geo 5 c.16; s.140; Sch 12

Abolition/enfranchisement framework, preserved rights and extinguishment of unresolved manorial incidents

Historical and legislative background of the Manorial Documents Register

States abolition of copyhold ended last meaningful function of manorial courts; defines protected manorial records

Manorial documents and lordships — how to use MDR

Official route to post-copyhold/manorial incident records, including MAF 13 compensation certificates/agreements and MAF 27 determinations; key to identifying what survived or was extinguished on specific former Colts copyholds.

Manorial Documents Register landing page

Official route for locating manorial records

Manors and manorial records research guide

Confirms lordship can survive independently of documents and rights; identifies historic ownership lists HMC 5/6-8

Gazetteer of Markets and Fairs to 1516 — Norfolk, Watlington

Records Watlington Norfolk market as prescriptive and noted in 1252

Token Corresponding Society volume — Watlington market history

Reports Watlington market history and that it was out of use by seventeenth century

John Davis Plestow — rector and patron of Watlington

Shows patronage had a later identifiable devolution

White's Norfolk 1845 — Watlington

C.B. Plestow lord of Gawsels; yearly courts leet/baron; rectory in his gift PASS 26: Holybreads £5 4s Davis rent-charge benefits both Watlington and Tottenhill; use parcel name as Davis-stream map discriminator.

White's Norfolk 1883 — Watlington

Records Watlington rectory in patronage of Gilbert Barker

Clerical biography — Watlington patron A.E.H. Birch in 1923

Records A.E.H. Birch as patron of Watlington in 1923

Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 · Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 ss.3,32

Section 32 severs advowsons appendant to land/manors; section 3 bars sale of patronage for value

Manorial Documents Register search result surfaced during Watlington research · SubjectID=172296

Potential direct MDR route for manor records

Watlington Colts 2025 sale catalogue and general manorial-rights terms · Manorial Services Catalogue Vol.11 — Watlington Colts lot

Sale-catalogue source-finder for the Watlington Colts narrative. PASS 10 comparison with Open Domesday identifies a material Domesday rights conflation: £2 matches Baynard Shouldham Thorpe, while mill/fishery/salthouse/two churches occur in a different Baynard Shouldham entry valued £15 6s.

Shouldham Sincks change of access — site owned by Stow Estates

Public-body page identifies Stow Estates as owner of Shouldham Sincks in 2021. Because Forestry England says retained estate sporting rights were exercised in the Sincks, this creates a concrete modern title-search lead.

Treatment of sporting rights for rating · LGRA 1997 / Rating Manual

Severed sporting rights ceased to be separately rateable from 1 Apr 1997

Indenture of Bargain & Sale — Shouldham Thorpe/Garboysthorpe, Foston and Russells · Hare 3083/2 201 x 6

Shows neighbouring manor package separately assured by Sir Robert Riche/Dame Frances to William Battes

Deed to Lead the Uses of a Recovery — Shouldham Thorpe/Garboysthorpe, Foston Russells and Gawsells · Hare 3085 201 x 6

Separately names multiple neighbouring manors in early Hare acquisition network

OS sheets marked for exchange between Hare and Hoff · Hare 6956/1-5; related Hare 6374-5

c.1900 Hare/Hoff exchange plans for Shouldham, Shouldham Thorpe, Marham and Wormegay; potential evidence of physical estate severance and reservations before 1926 reform and 1930 Edleston conveyance.

Edleston family — Norfolk/manorial papers and manorial-right purchase/extinguishment context · D/HH 8 route

PASS 7 correction: exposed D/HH 8/2/52-83 manorial-right correspondence concerns Mundford/Lynford, not Watlington; useful as method/context only

Edleston Estate Papers — manors, courts and extinguishment correspondence · D/Ed 10/3 and related

Contains 1920s-40s manorial incident extinguishment/purchase/court correspondence and Norfolk manorial material

Court Book — multi-manor volume including a separately listed Watlyngton section · HARE 2454

Official MDR/NRO metadata place HARE 2454 in an undifferentiated Watlington Manor record-creator series; chronology alone no longer supports preference as a Colts record

Extract of Award under Watlington Inclosure Act — allotment to Elizabeth Roberts · MS 7245, 7B4

Proves at catalogue level that at least one 1749 Watlington award extract survives under an exact shelfmark

Copy conveyance and other papers re exchange — Hare/Hoff reciprocal conveyances · HARE 6374/1-4; HARE 6375/1-72

Exact two-bundle file: Hare to Hoff 83 acres in South Runcton/Shouldham Thorpe/Shouldham; Hoff to Hare 106 acres in Shouldham Thorpe/Shouldham

Details of R.H. Edleston, his manors, advowsons etc. — one-paper typescript · D/HH 8/2/86

c.1930 typescript 'Details of R.H. Edleston, his manors, advowsons etc.' — potentially contemporary inventory of what Edleston believed he owned at approximately the Watlington Colts acquisition date.

Official NRO search result exposing HARE 2454 and MS 7245, 7B4 · NRO Watlington inclosure search

Reproducible official search route for the new court-book and award-extract catalogue records

Chronological Table of Private and Personal Acts · Watlington (Norfolk) inclosure entry

Corroborates the Watlington (Norfolk) inclosure Act's place in the 1749 private-Act sequence

Watlington Common Bill — committee proceeding for enclosing/dividing commons and wastes · House of Lords Journal vol.27 pp.313-319

Corroborates the bill's parliamentary proceeding and subject matter

Official MDR search result: one Watlington Manor creator, five collections held by two archives · Watlington Manor MDR search

Reproducible route to the complete official Watlington MDR result

Watlington Manor: HARE 4056, HARE 4058, F(M) roll 160, HARE 2454 and BL/MA 34 · F240215

Identifies a five-record custumal/rent/court sequence across Norfolk and Northamptonshire Archives

? Watlington, ? Wimbotsham; Custumal - Native tenants · HARE 4056, 210X5

Potential earliest structured source for rents, services, fold/custom, commons and court incidents

custumal (14th cent) · N14362168 / HARE 4056

Exact official MDR item route for HARE 4056 held by NRO

Watlyngton and Shuldham; Account of collector of rents · HARE 4058, 210X5

Can test rent roll, arrears, tenants, parcels and administrative relationship before the Colt succession

rent collector's accounts, with Shouldham Thorpe · N14372362 / HARE 4058

Exact official MDR item route for HARE 4058 held by NRO

court roll, with other manors · F(M) roll 160 / N14259432

Highest new transition-era priority immediately after Thomas Trussbut's reported 1451 death; may identify lord, court style, tenants, rents and customs

Northamptonshire Archives Online Catalogue home/search · Northamptonshire Archives online catalogue

Repository search route for F(M) roll 160 and NRA 5870 Wentworth material

court book, with other manors · N14349866 / HARE 2454

Exact official MDR route confirms HARE 2454 in the generic Watlington series

Draft court books of Tottenhill and Watlington in Philip Case's handwriting · BL/MA 34

Watlington section directly brackets the 1749 enclosure and can test court activity before/after it PASS 25: read as pre-1779 administrative control immediately preceding Plestow's court-book custody transfer; inspect final entries for change of lord/steward and enclosure effects.

draft court book · N14374985 / BL/MA 34

Exact official MDR item route for the Watlington draft court book

Plestow asks for Watlington and Tottenhill court books as he declines stewardship; court-book list receipted by Henry Bell · BL/CS 4/57

Attached list may identify the then-surviving Watlington/Tottenhill court-book run and any separately styled Colts series PASS 25 territorial reinterpretation: this 10 Aug 1779 record is now a first-tier de-combination anchor. Do not automatically equate generic 'Watlington' with Gawsells; obtain the annexed court-book list.

Watlington Manor authority record · GB/153/NM/4473

Links HARE 2454, BL/MA 34 and BL/CS 4/57 to a generic Watlington Manor creator; history names John Davis in the mid-18th century

Charles Berners Plestow of Watlington Hall described as lord of the manor of Gawsels with yearly courts leet and baron · White's Norfolk Directory — Watlington

Positive contemporary identification of Plestow as lord of Gawsells; same entry also says the Watlington rectory was in C.B. Plestow's gift, providing an advowson/patronage comparison point

G. Coote of Sudbury described as lord of the manor of Gawsels with yearly courts leet and baron · White's Norfolk Directory — Watlington

G. Coote is lord of Gawsells while Gilbert Barker is patron of Watlington rectory; direct evidence that later manorial title and parish patronage were separately owned

Records of charitable benefactions; 1601/2 feoffment identifies George Colt of Cavendish as son/heir of Henry Colt, son/heir of Sir George Colt · D/P 214/25/11

Corrects the generation of the later George Colt at the exact period relevant to the reported 1581/1587/1596 Watlington Colts alienation

Shouldham and Bilney Forest Plan webpage

Current Forestry England classification says Shouldham is leasehold land and distinguishes West Bilney as freehold

Watlington historical writing entry naming G. Barker, Esq. as patron of the living · Imperial Gazetteer of England and Wales — Watlington

Narrows the transfer/severance of Watlington patronage away from the Plestow 1845 position to Barker by 1870-72

Moat at the Old Rectory, Watlington · NHLE 1464092

Official corroborating route for the 1845 statement that Watlington rectory was in C.B. Plestow's gift

History and Antiquities of the County of Suffolk, vol. 1 — downloadable historical source

Useful Colt/Cavendish office and pedigree source-finder

The Visitation of Suffolke — searchable OCR text

Searchable source for Colt/Cavendish pedigree and spelling variants

The Visitation of Suffolke — direct PDF

Downloadable archival research copy for Colt pedigree cross-checking

Ralph Baynard — Domesday landholdings · Ralph Baynard person record

Lists Baynard's Clackclose holdings including separate Shouldham entries, Shouldham Thorpe and Tottenhill; no Watlington entry shown

Shouldham [All Saints and St Margaret] — Ralph Baynard entry · Norfolk 31,22

Baynard entry contains 0.8 mills, 1 fishery, 1 salthouse, 2 churches and church land; value £15 6s

Other Shouldham — Ralph Baynard entry · Norfolk 31,22

Alternative Open Domesday exposure of the same Baynard Shouldham resource package

Shouldham Thorpe — Ralph Baynard entry · Norfolk 31,23

Baynard holding valued £2 and mentioning Shouldham Thorpe/Tottenhill; it does not list the mill/fishery/two-church package attributed by the sale catalogue

Hundred of Clackclose — Domesday place list · Clackclose Hundred

Lists Shouldham, other Shouldham, Shouldham Thorpe, Tottenhill and Wallington; no place labelled Watlington

Wallington — Domesday entries · Wallington, Clackclose

Shows Norfolk Clackclose Wallington under Roger Bigot and Hermer of Ferrers, not Ralph Baynard

Æthelgyth / Ailid Domesday holdings · PASE Domesday name 2901

Confirms Ailid/Æthelgyth -> Baynard holdings at Shouldham and other Norfolk places; does not supply a Watlington entry in the displayed dataset

Shouldham parish historical summary · TNF1575

Places medieval Colts settlement behind Colts Hall east of village; Fair Stead Market northwest; also records post-medieval lime kiln. Useful spatial caution, not title proof.

John Forres, undersheriff of George Colte, Esq., Suffolk · Sir Nicholas Bacon Collection, item 3613

Independent period evidence for George Colte, Esq. active in Suffolk c.1587, supporting the corrected younger-George search target

Sir Henry Wyatt archival target references · Inq. post mort. 28 Hen. VIII m.5; will cited Cromwell f.7

Identifies Henry Wyatt's 1537 IPM and 1537/8 will as direct forward-chain tests after the 1506 Watlyngton fine

Official Norfolk Records Committee report — Shouldham field book with diagrammatic maps of field strips · NRO HARE 2826

Officially confirms a Shouldham field book dated 1440-1 incorporating diagrammatic field-strip maps

Local and Regional Cartography in Medieval Europe — exact HARE 2826 shelfmark and folios · NRO HARE 2826, fols 16v, 34v

Identifies Shouldham 1440-41 as NRO HARE 2826, fols 16v and 34v; explains maps are draft survey material covering only a tiny portion of written survey lands

Paul D. A. Harvey bibliography confirming dedicated Shouldham study · Harvey, Shouldham, Norfolk, 1440-1441, pp.195-201

Confirms dedicated chapter on Shouldham 1440-1441 in Local Maps and Plans from Medieval England, pp.195-201

Shouldham and Shouldham-Thorpe Inclosure schedule — bibliographic record · Goldsmiths'-Kress 17267.1; OCLC 22695421

Confirms 1798 schedule title, 11 pages, Kress provenance, and manuscript Thomas Hare licence to fell timber mounted between pp.8-9

Gelham Manor history — identifies Shouldham Priory Manor and its rent rolls in Dersingham · Dersingham Shouldham Priory Manor

Helps identify the 'Dersingham Shouldham' rental/court records as a Shouldham Priory estate stream rather than Colts

Stoke Ferry chronology reproducing Shouldham enclosure commissioners' notices and road descriptions · Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe enclosure notices

1796 enclosure notice names 'Abbey Common in Shouldham' and distinct Thomas Hare parcels. Important warning against treating all parish commons as Colts.

Agnes Bardolf IPM — Laurence Trussebute on two separate Watlington-linked fees · E-CIPM 18-793

Main 1 fee: Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey/Shouldham Thorpe/Langham held by Laurence Trussebute and others; separate Watlington 1/4 fee also held by Laurence Trussebute and others.

William Phelipp, Lord Bardolf IPM — Wormegay franchise bundle · E-CIPM 25-481; C 139/103/30

Wormegay held with knights' fees, advowsons, escheats, waifs, strays, soc, toll, team, infangthief, parks, mills, pastures, courts baron, views of frankpledge, leets, wreck, fairs, markets and warrens.

William Elwyn will transcription — Rent in Watlyngton called Parlettes to Thomas Karvyle the younger · PCC PROB 11/19/108

Shows a named Kervile-associated Watlington rent stream in 1518, close to the 1506 16s-rent transaction.

Tenures Abolition Act 1660 · 12 Cha II c.24

Statutory framework for abolition/conversion of knight-service tenure and charges incident to it.

Indenture covenant to levy a fine and suffer a recovery including Watlyngton alias Watlyngton Coltes · NRO HARE 4065

Real 1587 assurance-stage instrument naming Watlyngton alias Watlyngton Coltes; corrects simplistic '1587 completed sale' narrative.

Bargain and sale — George Colt to Thomas Schuldham of the manor of Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes · NRO HARE 2402

Major operative late-Elizabethan title anchor expressly naming both Colts and Trusbuttes.

Exemplification of Thomas Shuldham's title including liberty of a fold in Watlyngton and other places · NRO HARE 2403

Materially strengthens historic fold-right case in title package expressly containing Watlyngton/Watlyngton Coltes.

Law of Property Act 1925 — general words implied in conveyance of a manor · Law of Property Act 1925 s.62(3)-(4)

LPA 1925 s.62 general words reinforce the express 1930 conveyance wording; s.205 defines conveyance to include assent and vesting instruments, relevant to the 1977 deeds.

Manorial documents — abolition of copyhold and legal record preservation · Manorial Documents Rules background

Confirms 1922 property reforms ended the last meaningful function of manorial courts through abolition of copyhold and explains post-1925 record boundary.

Franchises and manors: apply for official search of index · Form SIF

Prescribed application route for searching index of relating franchises and manors

Form SIF direct PDF · SIF PDF

Direct downloadable form for manor/relating-franchise index search

HM Land Registry Information Services fees · Information Services fees

Current SIF fee £11 postal / £7 electronic per administrative area

Draft conveyance of Bowes Manorial Rights to Robert Holmes Edleston · D/HH 8/1/31

Shows Hanby Holmes archive preserved draft conveyance, recited prior deeds and completion material for Edleston's contemporary manorial purchases

Eric Richard Hanby Holmes deceased-estate notice · London Gazette issue 48555 p3869

Corroborates Eric as retired solicitor and names Richard John Hanby Holmes among personal representatives

Hall Farm Barns, Shouldham Thorpe — Stow Estate farming and shooting estate · 10/00612/F planning report

Describes Hare family's Stow Estate as traditional farming and shooting estate, then about 4,000 acres, including land around Shouldham Thorpe

Stow Estate Trust legal identity

Identifies Stow Estate Trust at Home Farm Office, Stow Bardolph

Land at Shouldham and Marham — proposed silica sand resource · SIL02

Records estimated 16 million tonne silica-sand resource in wider Shouldham/Marham area

Suffolk Institute proceedings — foldcourse legal entity and enclosure

States that the foldcourse as a legal entity disappeared with enclosure

Parliamentary written evidence on manorial rights · MAR0004

Explains ordinary incidents such as entry fines, quit rents, reliefs and heriots were extinguished/compensated, while minerals, sporting and markets were preserved

Poors' Land and Fuel Allotment — governing document identifies Shouldham Inclosure Award · Charity 207556; P.R. 29.(1) p.520

Expressly cites 'INCLOSURE AWARD 1794 SEE P.R. 29.(1) P.520'; proves operative allotment survived as charity property

Shouldham — 95-acre Fuel Allotment awarded at enclosure · White 1845 Shouldham

1845 operational estate snapshot: William Brighton warrener; John Bird farmer Abbey Farm; Charles Lemmon farmer Colts Hall; Richard Ramm Button Fen. Strong circumstantial separation of Warren, Abbey and Colts tenancies.

Shouldham Thorpe — 60-acre Fuel Allotment awarded in 1794 · White 1845 Shouldham Thorpe

States 60-acre fuel allotment was awarded in 1794

Shouldham Warren — in existence by 1616; tree planting 1847-1890 · Shouldham Warren walk history

Supplies chronology of warren existing by 1616 and later conversion/tree planting

Archaeological Evaluation at Watlington and Tottenhill — public sand/gravel pits under Tottenhill Inclosure Award · GL4004

Shows a nearby Norfolk enclosure award expressly set aside public sand/gravel pits

Watlington/Shouldham mineral resource and quarry context · Norfolk Minerals and Waste Local Plan 2023-2038

Records current/historic mineral sites in Watlington/Tottenhill and wider Shouldham silica-sand potential

King's Lynn and The Wash geological memoir — old sand pit at Shouldham Warren · Sheet 145, old sand pit TF 6836 1133

Records old sand pit at Shouldham Warren and Carstone/Leziate geology; proves historic extraction/resource presence

Shouldham — Thomas Leigh Hare described as lord of the manor · Kelly's Directory — Shouldham

Shows named Shouldham manor lordship remained recognised under Hare in 1896; strengthens caution against automatically assigning Hare Warren to Colts

Marham — Thomas Leigh Hare described as lord of the manor of New Hall and Shouldham · Kelly's Directory — Marham

More specific late-19th-century naming of Hare as lord of 'New Hall and Shouldham', useful for separating a continuing Shouldham manor stream from Colts

VCH Norfolk II — Shouldham Priory, manor endowment and Henry III free-warren grant · Hundred Rolls I pp.458,519,532,538; Quo Warranto p.489

States Geoffrey FitzPiers gave the priory his manor of Shouldham with its members and records the 1275 Clackclose jury finding that the prior had a Henry III grant of free warren.

Shouldham, Wereham and Stoke Ferry — 1.5 knight's fee held by prior of Shouldham · E-CIPM 22-507

Directly demonstrates a distinct Priory fee stream in Shouldham/Wereham/Stoke Ferry valued £7 10s

Prior of Shouldham free-warren charter at Cavenham — caution against assuming VCH grant was Shouldham-local · Cavenham/Kavenham manor narrative

Reports a Henry III free-warren charter for the Priory's Cavenham manor; creates a concrete alternative locality for the generic VCH free-warren statement

Parliamentary written evidence on surviving manorial-right records · MAF 9 / MAF 13 / MAF 27

Gives scale and date ranges for MAF 9 enfranchisement deeds, MAF 13 compensation records and MAF 27 determinations

Colts Hall — official National Grid Reference · NHLE 1152184; NGR TF67844 08887

Provides exact Colts Hall core location for comparison with Warren/mineral sites

1212 Norfolk/Suffolk return — Geoffrey fitz Peter holds Suldham by service of half a knight fee · Liber Feodorum, S.ij.8.II.336-352; Clackclose Hundred

New early Shouldham tenure/service anchor: Geoffrey fitz Peter is recorded in 1212 holding Suldham in the royal half-knight-service framework.

Early Archdeacons of Norwich Diocese — Shouldham foundation charter dating and witnesses · Monasticon Anglicanum vi p.95 cited by article

Dates the Geoffrey fitz Peter Shouldham foundation charter to 1199 in the article chronology and identifies witnesses; useful for testing the 1212 tenure/endowment layers.

Shouldham Priory foundation dating — Gilbertine foundation chronology · Borthwick Paper/MRB6 — monastic foundation chronology

Gives a 1193 x 1200 foundation window and discusses the uncertainty of the exact dating, preventing over-confidence in a single foundation year.

Rotuli Hundredorum temp. Hen. III & Edw. I — Volume 1 full-view route · Rotuli Hundredorum vol. I pp.458, 519, 532, 538 (VCH targets)

Direct digital route to the exact Hundred Rolls volume/pages cited by VCH for the Prior of Shouldham free-warren inquiry.

Placita de quo warranto temporibus Edw. I, II & III — full-view route · Placita de Quo Warranto p.489 (VCH target)

Direct digital route to the exact Quo Warranto page cited by VCH for the Shouldham Priory free-warren issue.

Forestry England trail-hunting spreadsheet — West Norfolk entries at The Sincks (Shouldham) · Published Trail Hunting Spreadsheet 13.12.19

Corroborates modern trail-hunting activity at The Sincks (Shouldham), consistent with a continuing sporting landscape.

Papal confirmation to the Gilbertine order listing the demesne manor of Suldham and Kavenham among named possessions · DEEDS charter 05610001

Directly strengthens the medieval Shouldham/Priory title structure and confirms Kavenham is genuinely present in the relevant Gilbertine possession list.

Downloadable scholarly cartulary edition containing the papal confirmation and Suldham/Kavenham wording · An Edition of the Cartulary of Alvingham Priory

Downloadable source for the full edited Latin context behind DEEDS charter 05610001.

Published Kent visitation pedigree showing William Butts and Leonard Butts in the same sibling generation, Leonard living at Bromley · Visitation of Kent 1619, p.116

Provides an independent family bridge between William of the 1611/1612 Russells context and Leonard of Bromley in the 1628 Hare recovery.

Herald's Visitation of Kent, with arms in colour; 1619 · British Library Add MS 23750

Official manuscript target for checking the printed Butts pedigree against an original/copy visitation source.

Visitation of Kent, 1619, by J. Philipott, Rouge-dragon, with arms in trick · British Library Stowe MS 618

Second official manuscript witness for the Kent visitation pedigree used in the William/Leonard Butts bridge.

Manuscripts of Sir Thomas Phillipps relating to Norfolk — identifiable Gawdy of West Harling provenance group · NRO Phi collection; Gawdy group Phi/300-1, 475-6, 583, 589, 613/2, 613/5

Potential route to dispersed Gawdy title deeds/estate papers relevant to the missing Shouldham/Colts/Rich assurances.

Gawdy family of West Harling, Norfolk — correspondence and papers · British Library Add MS 36990

Potentially relevant Gawdy household/farm/family papers across the exact period in which Shouldham/Colts title passed through Gawdy/Rich.

Scholarly citation of deed of release by Barrington, Marsham, Nathaniel Rich, Pym and Phesaunt to Sir John Hare of the manor and estate of Shouldham · NRO HARE MS 2723

First concrete 1632 HARE shelfmark located for a release of a Shouldham manor/estate to Sir John Hare; prime candidate for the missing Colts/Priory acquisition mechanism.

William Butts, gent., of Thorpe alias Shouldham Thorpe alias Garboysthorpe, Norfolk · PCC 36 Hele; mapped to PROB 11/148

Converts the missing William Butts probate from an open target into exact PCC citation 36 Hele, 1626.

Independent PCC metadata example mapping the 1626 Hele register to PROB 11/148 · PROB 11/148, Hele quires 1-56

Supports safe piece-level order target PROB 11/148 for William Butts 36 Hele.

The Swan-Marks of West Norfolk · Ticehurst, Swan-Marks of West Norfolk, pp.581-630

Reports Gawsell marks passing into Buttes family and latest William dying without issue in 1624; narrows William -> Leonard succession.

Collection of Norman F Ticehurst on swan marks · TIC / MS 819

Provides underlying research archive behind Ticehurst swan-mark publications, including original rolls, notes and facsimiles.

Swan Marks vol. IV — includes Stow Swan-roll then held by Sir Thomas Hare at Stow Hall · TIC/07; previous SAL/MS/819/4-13

Exact date range overlaps Gawsell/Buttes transition and reaches William Butts first Russell court year; may expose named owners and mark succession.

Collected Papers on Swan-History — includes The Swan-marks of West Norfolk, pp.581-630 · TIC/18 item 14

Official repository copy and bibliographic confirmation for Ticehurst West Norfolk article.

Leonard Butts of Norfolk reported restoring Sir William Butts memorial in 1627 · DNB Butts, William

Chronological identity control placing Leonard alive and styled of Norfolk one year before HARE 3085.

Printed description of Sir William Butts monument and later tablet by Leonard Butts of Norfolk · Faulkner, Historical and Topographical Account of Fulham, p.77ff

Independent historical source for Leonard Butts of Norfolk memorial activity; supports chronology only.

Official Forestry Commission annual-report listing: 140. Shouldham, Norfolk · Forestry Commission annual report; forest unit 140

Independently anchors Shouldham as a Forestry Commission forest unit in the 1943 reporting year; does not expose the Hare lease terms or Colts parcels.

Hoff Bros Ltd application to abstract water from Sandringham Greensands at Shouldham Thorpe · London Gazette issue 54595 p.15941

Exact Shouldham Thorpe subsurface-use evidence at TF663081 and TF667086; demonstrates parcel-specific modern resource use, not Colts mineral/title ownership.

Game on manors belonging to Mrs Moore and Lady Harris in Shouldham, Shouldham Thorpe and other parishes · Norfolk Chronicle p.4 cols 1-2 (transcription)

New pre-1845 evidence of manor-level sporting permission and threatened prosecution across manor holdings expressly including Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe. Does not identify Colts by name.

Plan of Stow Bardolph, Downham, Wimbotsham, Shouldham, Shouldham Thorpe and Marham, showing Stow Hall estate · NRO HARE 5185 231x2; CBTM 22535

New precise 1818 archive reference and surveyor/scale metadata. Major post-enclosure parcel-control target for Colts Farm versus Abbey Farm/Warren. PASS 25: now treated as a post-first-de-combination map of the retained Hare/Stow territory; compare Colts Farm, Abbey Farm, Warren and later HARE 5466.

Shouldham windmill, buildings and c.43 acres occupied by James Pollard; Hare land adjoining east · Auction notice reproduced from Lynn Advertiser

New comparison point for HARE 5466's 1871 Sir Thomas Hare–James Pollard windmill tenancy; may reveal an acquisition/reorganisation between 1867 and 1871.

Peerage record identifying Lady Harris as Mary Hare, daughter of Sir Thomas Hare, 4th Bt. · Mary Hare / Sir Thomas Harris

Identifies Lady Harris in the 1782 game notice within the Hare/Stow family succession environment.

Monumental evidence for Thomas Moore and widow Elizabeth, daughter of a Sir Thomas Hare of Stow Bardolph · Edmund Farrer, Church Heraldry of Norfolk, vol. III

Provides Hare-family context for Mrs Moore named with Lady Harris in the 1782 game notice.

Sir Thomas Barrington–John Pym association strengthened through Providence Island Company · Barrington Family Letters, Camden Fourth Series

Context for HARE 2723 parties: makes a Warwick-associated settlement/trust/conveyancing mechanism plausible, but the deed itself must establish legal capacity.

Death of Mrs Plestow, wife of Thomas Plestow Esq. of Watlington Hall · Norfolk Chronicle p.2 col.3 (GENUKI transcription)

Independently fixes Thomas Plestow at Watlington Hall by May 1781, reinforcing BL/CS 4/57 (1779) as an early de-combination anchor.

Watlington Hall Park; 1869 map drawn up for sale of the estate · NHER 31972; S1 NCC Parks & Gardens Survey Vol 2

Independent confirmation of an 1869 Watlington Hall estate sale map and sale particulars; first-tier second-severance target. PASS 26 enrichment: 1839 park components/dykes and c.100-acre 1869 sale-map landscape confirm a mapped physical-estate sale requiring lot/reservation analysis.

Tottenhill: £2,793 real property, £157 in quarries; manor belongs to Mrs Plestow · Imperial Gazetteer of England and Wales

Shows economically material quarry value inside a Plestow-attributed manorial territory that also sits in the medieval Trussbut fee and 1930 bundle.

Hare baronet succession, extinction 1764, Lady Harris death 1791 and estates to Thomas Leigh · Complete Baronetage vol. II — Hare of Stow Bardolph

Places 1779-82 de-combination evidence inside a Hare succession/reorganisation period ending with Lady Harris death in 1791.

Thomas Leigh later Hare assumed Hare surname in 1791 · House of Hare

Independent non-PDF support for the 1791 transition to Thomas Leigh/Hare after the older Hare succession period.

Norfolk List of 1721: Sir Ralph Hare of Stow Bardolph and separate Watlington proprietors including Samuel Taylor, Samuel Burkin and John Davis · Royal Archives Stuart 65/10, scholarly transcription

Proves Hare/Stow and multiple Watlington landed streams existed side by side by 1721; materially corrects the simple Hare->Plestow split model.

Holybreads land bears £5 4s annual rent-charge benefiting poor of Watlington and Tottenhill · John Davis charity / Holybreads

Concrete Davis parcel name tying Watlington and Tottenhill; high-value mapping discriminator for Davis/Gawsells/Tottenhill vs Hare/Colts streams.

Davis charity of £5 4s yearly, said left in 1747, 8 loaves Watlington / 4 Tottenhill · Kelly's Directory Tottenhill

Adds reported 1747 date and distribution structure to Holybreads/Davis land-charge stream.

Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen parcel beside road to Watlington, bounded west by C.B. Plestow and east by James Becket · Norwich Mercury advertisements

Direct evidence that Plestow freehold territory reached Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen, overlapping the same peripheral geography historically named in Colts conveyances.

Thomas Harrison, formerly Watlington, late Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen, lime-burner · London Gazette issue 12215 p.8

Real lime-burning occupation spans Watlington and Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen, strengthening the territorial lime/mineral investigation beyond generic geology.

1757 drainage Act; later drainage Acts; Fitton Inclosure Act 1807 and 58-claim Statement of Claims 1808 · Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen land/property bibliography

Creates concrete statutory/enclosure route for historical Colts/Plestow Wiggenhall limbs; 58 claims are a high-value owner/parcel search target.

Great Bank / Border Bank Estate vested in Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen Commissioners by 1757 Act; residual c.22 acres · KLIDB minutes 30 Jan 2015

Concrete statutory vesting-and-resale mechanism inside a parish historically named in extended Colts geography.

Shouldham, Norfolk total Forestry area 956 acres · Forestry Commission 34th Annual Report

Provides 1953 territorial baseline for post-1943 Forestry unit; essential for testing sporting/warren lease footprint.

Shouldham, Norfolk total Forestry area 1,290 acres · Forestry Commission 35th Annual Report

Shows Shouldham Forestry reported area increased by 334 acres between 1953 and 1954; likely acquisition/addition/reclassification requires archival explanation.

Lynn Forest comprises former Gaywood and Shouldham Forests · Forestry Commission annual report 1960

After 1960 archival searching must include Lynn Forest; modern forest name is not stable enough to define original 1943 lease territory.

Macons — Watlington Norfolk Plestow · Macons — Watlington Norfolk Plestow

ID: MA-001
Search Term / Variant: Macons
Context Added: Watlington Norfolk Plestow
Result: No reliable relevant public-web hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO HARE / BL/CS / Cambridge sale particulars
Next Search: Search exact term inside ordered 1869 sale particulars and HARE field books.
Notes: Do not merge.

Macon's — Watlington Hall / Plestow · Macon's — Watlington Hall / Plestow

ID: MA-002
Search Term / Variant: Macon's
Context Added: Watlington Hall / Plestow
Result: No reliable relevant public-web hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO / Cambridge
Next Search: Search apostrophe and OCR variants in archive catalogues and images.
Notes: Do not merge.

Macon — Watlington Norfolk manor · Macon — Watlington Norfolk manor

ID: MA-003
Search Term / Variant: Macon
Context Added: Watlington Norfolk manor
Result: No reliable relevant public-web hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO HARE deeds
Next Search: Search personal surname and property-name possibilities separately.
Notes: Could be person, farm, field, house or OCR.

Macons Manor — Norfolk / Watlington · Macons Manor — Norfolk / Watlington

ID: MA-004
Search Term / Variant: Macons Manor
Context Added: Norfolk / Watlington
Result: No verified record located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: MDR / NRO
Next Search: Search Manorial Documents Register and NRO title-deed descriptions.
Notes: Do not assume manor status.

Masons / Mason's — Watlington / Shouldham / Plestow · Masons / Mason's — Watlington / Shouldham / Plestow

ID: MA-005
Search Term / Variant: Masons / Mason's
Context Added: Watlington / Shouldham / Plestow
Result: Not treated as equivalent; no documentary bridge located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: OCR VARIANT ONLY
Repository / Search Target: NRO / sale particulars
Next Search: Check only as OCR/palaeographic variant when viewing originals.
Notes: Never silently substitute.

Macons — Coote / Humphreys / Edleston · Macons — Coote / Humphreys / Edleston

ID: MA-006
Search Term / Variant: Macons
Context Added: Coote / Humphreys / Edleston
Result: No verified relevant hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: Durham D/HH / NRO
Next Search: Search title schedules/abstracts; these often preserve obsolete field/property names.
Notes: High-value later-title route.

Macons — Colt / Coltes / Trusbut / Trussbutts · Macons — Colt / Coltes / Trusbut / Trussbutts

ID: MA-007
Search Term / Variant: Macons
Context Added: Colt / Coltes / Trusbut / Trussbutts
Result: No verified relevant hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO HARE early title deeds
Next Search: Search phrase co-occurrence once deed images are obtained.
Notes: Connection remains unproved.

Norfolk Record Office · Norfolk Record Office

Repository: Norfolk Record Office
Priority Records: HARE 3083/2; HARE 3085; HARE 2495; HARE 6832; BL/CS 4/57; verify HARE 2719 & HARE 979; search 1580s–1630s and 1760–1780 title deeds
Physical / Service Context: The Archive Centre, Norwich; HARE family archive and associated solicitor/estate papers are central.
Catalogue: https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/
Copy / Enquiry Route: https://www.archives.norfolk.gov.uk/
Exact Request Wording: Please provide complete images and full catalogue metadata for the listed references. In addition, search title deeds/abstracts for 'Watlington Colts', 'Watlington Coltes', 'Watlington Trusbutts/Trusbuts', George Colt, Thomas Shouldham/Schuldham, Francis Gawdy, Robert/Frances Rich, Sir John Hare, Lady Mary Hare and Thomas Plestow. Priority is the Colt→Shouldham conveyance dated either 1587 or 1596, the Shouldham→Gawdy conveyance, the 1632 transfer to Hare, and the Hare→Plestow purchase.
Why: Best chance of actual operative deeds and recitals.
Priority: CRITICAL
Expected Yield: Original deeds, maps, surveys, title abstracts, sale/settlement chains
Caveat: References from private transcription must be independently confirmed.
Source URL: https://www.archives.norfolk.gov.uk/

Cambridge University Library — Map Department · Cambridge University Library — Map Department

Repository: Cambridge University Library — Map Department
Priority Records: 1869 Watlington Hall Estate sale particulars, 48 lots; associated plan/map
Physical / Service Context: ArchiveSearch indexes sales particulars, object page blocked to automated fetch.
Catalogue: https://archivesearch.lib.cam.ac.uk/
Copy / Enquiry Route: Use Cambridge Special Collections/Map Department enquiry
Exact Request Wording: Please confirm the exact shelfmark for 'The Watlington Hall Estate ... in forty-eight lots' in the 1869 sales-particulars volumes and quote for a complete scan including plans, conditions of sale, manuscript purchaser/price annotations, cover/title page and any inserted correspondence.
Why: Can identify exact 1869 lots, purchaser(s), manor/right clauses and sale map.
Priority: CRITICAL
Expected Yield: Direct sale document and plan
Caveat: Catalogue hit verified; document contents not yet inspected.
Source URL: https://archivesearch.lib.cam.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/263073

Durham Record Office · Durham Record Office

Repository: Durham Record Office
Priority Records: Search D/HH Holmes/Edleston solicitor archive for Watlington/Colts/Trusbutts/Gawsells/Tottenhill, Humphreys, Coote, 1929, 1952–1977
Physical / Service Context: Existing D/HH 8/2 records prove this archive preserves parchment manorial conveyances and Edleston/Hanby Holmes correspondence.
Catalogue: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/
Copy / Enquiry Route: Durham Record Office catalogue/enquiry
Exact Request Wording: Please search the Holmes/Edleston solicitor deposits for any conveyance, contract, abstract of title, schedule of deeds, probate, court order, letters of administration de bonis non or vesting assent relating to Watlington, Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham, Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts, Tottenhill, Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys, Robert Holmes Edleston, Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston, Eric Richard Hanby Holmes or Bertram Stephen Liddon Surtees Raine, especially 1929 and 1952–1977.
Why: Best identified route to 1929 purchase and modern legal vesting series.
Priority: CRITICAL
Expected Yield: Executed conveyance, title abstract, solicitor correspondence, probate/assent bundle
Caveat: Current Watlington-specific reference not found; request archivist name/place search.
Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=

The National Archives / legal record series · The National Archives / legal record series

Repository: The National Archives / legal record series
Priority Records: Enrolled conveyances, Feet of Fines, recoveries, Close/Patent material around 1587/1596 and 1632
Physical / Service Context: Discovery can identify central-government legal records even when estate deed is missing.
Catalogue: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
Copy / Enquiry Route: Advanced search / research guidance
Exact Request Wording: Search exact alias phrase 'Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes' plus George Colt, Thomas Shouldham, Francis Gawdy, Robert Rich/Frances Rich and Sir John Hare; search both 1587 and 1596 and recovery/fine dates around 1628–1632.
Why: An enrolled fine/recovery/licence may independently settle date and parties.
Priority: HIGH
Expected Yield: Official enrolment or concord
Caveat: Manorial estate transfers are not always centrally enrolled.
Source URL: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Stage 1: Trusbut family → Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt), heiress · IPM digital edition

IPM/fee evidence anchors Thomas Trusbut holding Watlington; no specific heiress conveyance located.

Stage 2: Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt) → Thomas Colt Jr · Historic England narrative

Historic England states Trusbutt manor passed by marriage to Thomas Colt; no operative marriage settlement or fine located.

Stage 3: Thomas Colt Jr → John Colt · —

User chain only in this pass; no will/IPM located.

Stage 4: John Colt → Sir George Colt · —

User chain and later official narrative anchor George Colt as seller; no inheritance instrument located.

Stage 5: Sir George Colt → Thomas Shouldham · Exact deed not located

Historic England says 1587. Commercial title catalogue says 1596 and supplies alleged wording 'manor of Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes...'

Stage 6: Thomas Shouldham → Sir Francis Gawdy · HARE 2719; HARE 979 (transcribed refs)

Historic England states Shouldham shortly afterwards sold Colt's manor to Judge Gawdy. Associated 1587 licence and 1590 feoffment exist in HARE references but do not yet prove Colts transfer.

Stage 7: Sir Francis Gawdy → Gawdy granddaughter / Rich line · Historic England; Gawdy family correspondence collections

Historic England says united manors passed through Gawdy's granddaughter to Earl of Warwick; no probate copy/title schedule located in this pass.

Stage 8: Frances / Robert Rich → Sir John Hare · Hare 3083/2; Hare 3085

Historic England gives 1632. Genuine 1611 Rich bargain & sale and 1628 deed to lead uses survive for associated local manors; exact 1632 Colts deed not located.

Stage 9: Sir John Hare → Hare baronets / Lady Mary Hare · HARE family archive

Hare family archive is extensive; user chain supplies succession. No individual probate/settlement series was fully reconstructed in this pass.

Stage 10: Lady Mary Hare → Thomas Plestow · BL/CS 4/57

By 10 Aug 1779 Plestow of Watlington Hall was requesting court books for Watlington and Tottenhill. Purchase deed itself not located.

Stage 11: Thomas Plestow → Sir Thomas Berners Plestow · —

No operative probate/settlement located in this pass.

Stage 12: Sir Thomas Berners Plestow → Charles Berners Plestow · —

No operative probate/settlement located in this pass.

Stage 13: Charles Berners Plestow → Charles John Berners Plestow · —

No operative probate/settlement located in this pass.

Stage 14: Charles John Berners Plestow → George Coote / 1869 purchaser · Cambridge Map Dept sale particulars; 1869 sale map

Actual Cambridge sale-particulars catalogue hit; Heritage Gateway confirms an 1869 sale map. Completion conveyance not yet located.

Stage 15: George Coote → Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys · —

No will/probate located in this pass.

Stage 16: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys → Rev. Robert Holmes Edleston · Durham D/HH 8/2 comparator records

Commercial title catalogue/user chain says 1929 sale. Durham archive proves Edleston's manorial conveyances and solicitor correspondence survive generally, but no Watlington-specific item was found.

Stage 17: R.H. Edleston estate / Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston / Crown → Probate / legal vesting stages · Do not infer title mechanics from generic Edleston files.

Durham Holmes solicitor archive — target

Stage 18: Crown / Sarah estate → Eric R.H. Holmes & B.S.L.S. Raine, administrators de bonis non · —

Attached chain supplies date/role; no image or official item reference located in this pass.

Stage 19: Administrators → Eric R.H. Holmes · Durham archive likely

Attached chain states vesting assent; no Watlington-specific copy located.

Stage 20: Eric R.H. Holmes → Richard John Hanby Holmes · —

Attached chain supplies date; no operative document located in this pass.

Stage 21: Richard John Hanby Holmes → Crown / Olivia Mary Holmes sequence · —

Attached chain gives sequence; no public instrument located in this pass.

Research process / search log (32)
Macons — Watlington Norfolk Plestow · Macons identity / alias search · Conveyance Register 2026-08-30

ID: MA-001
Search Term / Variant: Macons
Context Added: Watlington Norfolk Plestow
Result: No reliable relevant public-web hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO HARE / BL/CS / Cambridge sale particulars
Next Search: Search exact term inside ordered 1869 sale particulars and HARE field books.
Notes: Do not merge.

Notes: Result: No reliable relevant public-web hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO HARE / BL/CS / Cambridge sale particulars
Next Search: Search exact term inside ordered 1869 sale particulars and HARE field books.
Notes: Do not merge.

URL: Macons

Macon's — Watlington Hall / Plestow · Macons identity / alias search · Conveyance Register 2026-08-30

ID: MA-002
Search Term / Variant: Macon's
Context Added: Watlington Hall / Plestow
Result: No reliable relevant public-web hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO / Cambridge
Next Search: Search apostrophe and OCR variants in archive catalogues and images.
Notes: Do not merge.

Notes: Result: No reliable relevant public-web hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO / Cambridge
Next Search: Search apostrophe and OCR variants in archive catalogues and images.
Notes: Do not merge.

URL: Macons

Macon — Watlington Norfolk manor · Macons identity / alias search · Conveyance Register 2026-08-30

ID: MA-003
Search Term / Variant: Macon
Context Added: Watlington Norfolk manor
Result: No reliable relevant public-web hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO HARE deeds
Next Search: Search personal surname and property-name possibilities separately.
Notes: Could be person, farm, field, house or OCR.

Notes: Result: No reliable relevant public-web hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO HARE deeds
Next Search: Search personal surname and property-name possibilities separately.
Notes: Could be person, farm, field, house or OCR.

URL: Macons

Macons Manor — Norfolk / Watlington · Macons identity / alias search · Conveyance Register 2026-08-30

ID: MA-004
Search Term / Variant: Macons Manor
Context Added: Norfolk / Watlington
Result: No verified record located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: MDR / NRO
Next Search: Search Manorial Documents Register and NRO title-deed descriptions.
Notes: Do not assume manor status.

Notes: Result: No verified record located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: MDR / NRO
Next Search: Search Manorial Documents Register and NRO title-deed descriptions.
Notes: Do not assume manor status.

URL: Macons

Masons / Mason's — Watlington / Shouldham / Plestow · Macons identity / alias search · Conveyance Register 2026-08-30

ID: MA-005
Search Term / Variant: Masons / Mason's
Context Added: Watlington / Shouldham / Plestow
Result: Not treated as equivalent; no documentary bridge located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: OCR VARIANT ONLY
Repository / Search Target: NRO / sale particulars
Next Search: Check only as OCR/palaeographic variant when viewing originals.
Notes: Never silently substitute.

Notes: Result: Not treated as equivalent; no documentary bridge located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: OCR VARIANT ONLY
Repository / Search Target: NRO / sale particulars
Next Search: Check only as OCR/palaeographic variant when viewing originals.
Notes: Never silently substitute.

URL: Macons

Macons — Coote / Humphreys / Edleston · Macons identity / alias search · Conveyance Register 2026-08-30

ID: MA-006
Search Term / Variant: Macons
Context Added: Coote / Humphreys / Edleston
Result: No verified relevant hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: Durham D/HH / NRO
Next Search: Search title schedules/abstracts; these often preserve obsolete field/property names.
Notes: High-value later-title route.

Notes: Result: No verified relevant hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: Durham D/HH / NRO
Next Search: Search title schedules/abstracts; these often preserve obsolete field/property names.
Notes: High-value later-title route.

URL: Macons

Macons — Colt / Coltes / Trusbut / Trussbutts · Macons identity / alias search · Conveyance Register 2026-08-30

ID: MA-007
Search Term / Variant: Macons
Context Added: Colt / Coltes / Trusbut / Trussbutts
Result: No verified relevant hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO HARE early title deeds
Next Search: Search phrase co-occurrence once deed images are obtained.
Notes: Connection remains unproved.

Notes: Result: No verified relevant hit located.
Verified Connection?: NO
Classification: UNRESOLVED
Repository / Search Target: NRO HARE early title deeds
Next Search: Search phrase co-occurrence once deed images are obtained.
Notes: Connection remains unproved.

URL: Macons

Norfolk Record Office · Archive access / retrieval target · Conveyance Register 2026-08-30

Repository: Norfolk Record Office
Priority Records: HARE 3083/2; HARE 3085; HARE 2495; HARE 6832; BL/CS 4/57; verify HARE 2719 & HARE 979; search 1580s–1630s and 1760–1780 title deeds
Physical / Service Context: The Archive Centre, Norwich; HARE family archive and associated solicitor/estate papers are central.
Catalogue: https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/
Copy / Enquiry Route: https://www.archives.norfolk.gov.uk/
Exact Request Wording: Please provide complete images and full catalogue metadata for the listed references. In addition, search title deeds/abstracts for 'Watlington Colts', 'Watlington Coltes', 'Watlington Trusbutts/Trusbuts', George Colt, Thomas Shouldham/Schuldham, Francis Gawdy, Robert/Frances Rich, Sir John Hare, Lady Mary Hare and Thomas Plestow. Priority is the Colt→Shouldham conveyance dated either 1587 or 1596, the Shouldham→Gawdy conveyance, the 1632 transfer to Hare, and the Hare→Plestow purchase.
Why: Best chance of actual operative deeds and recitals.
Priority: CRITICAL
Expected Yield: Original deeds, maps, surveys, title abstracts, sale/settlement chains
Caveat: References from private transcription must be independently confirmed.
Source URL: https://www.archives.norfolk.gov.uk/

Notes: Priority Records: HARE 3083/2; HARE 3085; HARE 2495; HARE 6832; BL/CS 4/57; verify HARE 2719 & HARE 979; search 1580s–1630s and 1760–1780 title deeds
Copy / Enquiry Route: https://www.archives.norfolk.gov.uk/
Exact Request Wording: Please provide complete images and full catalogue metadata for the listed references. In addition, search title deeds/abstracts for 'Watlington Colts', 'Watlington Coltes', 'Watlington Trusbutts/Trusbuts', George Colt, Thomas Shouldham/Schuldham, Francis Gawdy, Robert/Frances Rich, Sir John Hare, Lady Mary Hare and Thomas Plestow. Priority is the Colt→Shouldham conveyance dated either 1587 or 1596, the Shouldham→Gawdy conveyance, the 1632 transfer to Hare, and the Hare→Plestow purchase.
Why: Best chance of actual operative deeds and recitals.
Priority: CRITICAL
Expected Yield: Original deeds, maps, surveys, title abstracts, sale/settlement chains
Caveat: References from private transcription must be independently confirmed.

URL: https://www.archives.norfolk.gov.uk/

Cambridge University Library — Map Department · Archive access / retrieval target · Conveyance Register 2026-08-30

Repository: Cambridge University Library — Map Department
Priority Records: 1869 Watlington Hall Estate sale particulars, 48 lots; associated plan/map
Physical / Service Context: ArchiveSearch indexes sales particulars, object page blocked to automated fetch.
Catalogue: https://archivesearch.lib.cam.ac.uk/
Copy / Enquiry Route: Use Cambridge Special Collections/Map Department enquiry
Exact Request Wording: Please confirm the exact shelfmark for 'The Watlington Hall Estate ... in forty-eight lots' in the 1869 sales-particulars volumes and quote for a complete scan including plans, conditions of sale, manuscript purchaser/price annotations, cover/title page and any inserted correspondence.
Why: Can identify exact 1869 lots, purchaser(s), manor/right clauses and sale map.
Priority: CRITICAL
Expected Yield: Direct sale document and plan
Caveat: Catalogue hit verified; document contents not yet inspected.
Source URL: https://archivesearch.lib.cam.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/263073

Notes: Priority Records: 1869 Watlington Hall Estate sale particulars, 48 lots; associated plan/map
Copy / Enquiry Route: Use Cambridge Special Collections/Map Department enquiry
Exact Request Wording: Please confirm the exact shelfmark for 'The Watlington Hall Estate ... in forty-eight lots' in the 1869 sales-particulars volumes and quote for a complete scan including plans, conditions of sale, manuscript purchaser/price annotations, cover/title page and any inserted correspondence.
Why: Can identify exact 1869 lots, purchaser(s), manor/right clauses and sale map.
Priority: CRITICAL
Expected Yield: Direct sale document and plan
Caveat: Catalogue hit verified; document contents not yet inspected.

URL: https://archivesearch.lib.cam.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/263073

Durham Record Office · Archive access / retrieval target · Conveyance Register 2026-08-30

Repository: Durham Record Office
Priority Records: Search D/HH Holmes/Edleston solicitor archive for Watlington/Colts/Trusbutts/Gawsells/Tottenhill, Humphreys, Coote, 1929, 1952–1977
Physical / Service Context: Existing D/HH 8/2 records prove this archive preserves parchment manorial conveyances and Edleston/Hanby Holmes correspondence.
Catalogue: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/
Copy / Enquiry Route: Durham Record Office catalogue/enquiry
Exact Request Wording: Please search the Holmes/Edleston solicitor deposits for any conveyance, contract, abstract of title, schedule of deeds, probate, court order, letters of administration de bonis non or vesting assent relating to Watlington, Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham, Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts, Tottenhill, Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys, Robert Holmes Edleston, Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston, Eric Richard Hanby Holmes or Bertram Stephen Liddon Surtees Raine, especially 1929 and 1952–1977.
Why: Best identified route to 1929 purchase and modern legal vesting series.
Priority: CRITICAL
Expected Yield: Executed conveyance, title abstract, solicitor correspondence, probate/assent bundle
Caveat: Current Watlington-specific reference not found; request archivist name/place search.
Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=

Notes: Priority Records: Search D/HH Holmes/Edleston solicitor archive for Watlington/Colts/Trusbutts/Gawsells/Tottenhill, Humphreys, Coote, 1929, 1952–1977
Copy / Enquiry Route: Durham Record Office catalogue/enquiry
Exact Request Wording: Please search the Holmes/Edleston solicitor deposits for any conveyance, contract, abstract of title, schedule of deeds, probate, court order, letters of administration de bonis non or vesting assent relating to Watlington, Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham, Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts, Tottenhill, Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys, Robert Holmes Edleston, Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston, Eric Richard Hanby Holmes or Bertram Stephen Liddon Surtees Raine, especially 1929 and 1952–1977.
Why: Best identified route to 1929 purchase and modern legal vesting series.
Priority: CRITICAL
Expected Yield: Executed conveyance, title abstract, solicitor correspondence, probate/assent bundle
Caveat: Current Watlington-specific reference not found; request archivist name/place search.

URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=

The National Archives / legal record series · Archive access / retrieval target · Conveyance Register 2026-08-30

Repository: The National Archives / legal record series
Priority Records: Enrolled conveyances, Feet of Fines, recoveries, Close/Patent material around 1587/1596 and 1632
Physical / Service Context: Discovery can identify central-government legal records even when estate deed is missing.
Catalogue: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
Copy / Enquiry Route: Advanced search / research guidance
Exact Request Wording: Search exact alias phrase 'Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes' plus George Colt, Thomas Shouldham, Francis Gawdy, Robert Rich/Frances Rich and Sir John Hare; search both 1587 and 1596 and recovery/fine dates around 1628–1632.
Why: An enrolled fine/recovery/licence may independently settle date and parties.
Priority: HIGH
Expected Yield: Official enrolment or concord
Caveat: Manorial estate transfers are not always centrally enrolled.
Source URL: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Notes: Priority Records: Enrolled conveyances, Feet of Fines, recoveries, Close/Patent material around 1587/1596 and 1632
Copy / Enquiry Route: Advanced search / research guidance
Exact Request Wording: Search exact alias phrase 'Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes' plus George Colt, Thomas Shouldham, Francis Gawdy, Robert Rich/Frances Rich and Sir John Hare; search both 1587 and 1596 and recovery/fine dates around 1628–1632.
Why: An enrolled fine/recovery/licence may independently settle date and parties.
Priority: HIGH
Expected Yield: Official enrolment or concord
Caveat: Manorial estate transfers are not always centrally enrolled.

URL: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Stage 1: Trusbut family → Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt), heiress · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 15th c.

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 1
From: Trusbut family
To: Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt), heiress
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance / heiress succession
Approx. Date / Period: 15th c.
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: IPM/fee evidence anchors Thomas Trusbut holding Watlington; no specific heiress conveyance located.
Archive Ref / Object: IPM digital edition
Conflict / Caveat: Holding is evidenced; inheritance mechanism still requires will/IPM/heirship record.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will, IPM, partition or settlement showing Jane's title.
Priority: HIGH
Source URL: https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/22-791/794.html
Research Note: Search Trusbut wills, IPMs, fines and marriage settlements.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 2: Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt) → Thomas Colt Jr · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 15th c.

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 2
From: Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)
To: Thomas Colt Jr
Transfer Type in Chain: Marriage / jure uxoris
Approx. Date / Period: 15th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: Historic England states Trusbutt manor passed by marriage to Thomas Colt; no operative marriage settlement or fine located.
Archive Ref / Object: Historic England narrative
Conflict / Caveat: Official corroboration is not the underlying instrument.
Missing Operative Instrument: Marriage settlement, fine, feoffment or heirship record.
Priority: HIGH
Source URL: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry
Research Note: Search Feet of Fines, Common Pleas and HARE early title deeds.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 3: Thomas Colt Jr → John Colt · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 16th c.

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 3
From: Thomas Colt Jr
To: John Colt
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: 16th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: User chain only in this pass; no will/IPM located.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: No new primary transfer record found.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will/probate/IPM.
Priority: MEDIUM
Source URL: Search PCC/Norfolk probate + IPM.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 4: John Colt → Sir George Colt · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 16th c.

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 4
From: John Colt
To: Sir George Colt
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: 16th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: User chain and later official narrative anchor George Colt as seller; no inheritance instrument located.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: No new primary transfer record found.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will/probate/IPM.
Priority: MEDIUM
Source URL: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry
Research Note: Search Colt family probate and fines.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 5: Sir George Colt → Thomas Shouldham · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 1587 or 1596

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 5
From: Sir George Colt
To: Thomas Shouldham
Transfer Type in Chain: Sale
Approx. Date / Period: 1587 or 1596
Documentary Status: CONFLICT
Best Evidence Located: Historic England says 1587. Commercial title catalogue says 1596 and supplies alleged wording 'manor of Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes...'
Archive Ref / Object: Exact deed not located
Conflict / Caveat: Two incompatible secondary dates. Commercial wording is a search lead, not proof.
Missing Operative Instrument: Original bargain & sale / feoffment / fine / enrolment with exact manor wording.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry
Research Note: Search NRO HARE deeds plus enrolled records using all place-name variants and the quoted parcel list.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 6: Thomas Shouldham → Sir Francis Gawdy · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · shortly after 1587 / late 16th c.

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 6
From: Thomas Shouldham
To: Sir Francis Gawdy
Transfer Type in Chain: Sale
Approx. Date / Period: shortly after 1587 / late 16th c.
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: Historic England states Shouldham shortly afterwards sold Colt's manor to Judge Gawdy. Associated 1587 licence and 1590 feoffment exist in HARE references but do not yet prove Colts transfer.
Archive Ref / Object: HARE 2719; HARE 979 (transcribed refs)
Conflict / Caveat: Associated transactions may be title recitals rather than the Colts deed itself.
Missing Operative Instrument: Specific Shouldham→Gawdy conveyance naming Colts/Trusbutts.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry
Research Note: Verify HARE 2719/HARE 979 and search adjacent deeds.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 7: Sir Francis Gawdy → Gawdy granddaughter / Rich line · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 1605 onward

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 7
From: Sir Francis Gawdy
To: Gawdy granddaughter / Rich line
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: 1605 onward
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: Historic England says united manors passed through Gawdy's granddaughter to Earl of Warwick; no probate copy/title schedule located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: Historic England; Gawdy family correspondence collections
Conflict / Caveat: Exact devise/administration path needs original probate/legal record.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will, administration, settlement and marriage documents.
Priority: HIGH
Source URL: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry
Research Note: Search Gawdy probate and Rich estate acts/settlements.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 8: Frances / Robert Rich → Sir John Hare · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · ultimately 1632

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 8
From: Frances / Robert Rich
To: Sir John Hare
Transfer Type in Chain: Sale / acquisition
Approx. Date / Period: ultimately 1632
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: Historic England gives 1632. Genuine 1611 Rich bargain & sale and 1628 deed to lead uses survive for associated local manors; exact 1632 Colts deed not located.
Archive Ref / Object: Hare 3083/2; Hare 3085
Conflict / Caveat: The 1628 instrument names Gawsells but not Colts in catalogue abstract.
Missing Operative Instrument: 1632 deed/recovery/fine naming Colts/Trusbutts, or a recital proving inclusion.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/297d3b1d-dad8-42d6-b050-1bcf5e0e2de1
Research Note: Order 1611 and 1628 deeds; search HARE sequence around 1632.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 9: Sir John Hare → Hare baronets / Lady Mary Hare · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 17th–18th c.

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 9
From: Sir John Hare
To: Hare baronets / Lady Mary Hare
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: 17th–18th c.
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: Hare family archive is extensive; user chain supplies succession. No individual probate/settlement series was fully reconstructed in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: HARE family archive
Conflict / Caveat: Internal succession likely documented in settlements/wills but not yet crosswalked.
Missing Operative Instrument: Wills, settlements, marriage portions and estate abstracts.
Priority: MEDIUM
Source URL: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/c921aedb-c1d7-4f72-b3c1-f08abe8d09b2
Research Note: Search HARE family settlements for Watlington/Shouldham manor schedules.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 10: Lady Mary Hare → Thomas Plestow · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · c.1760s–1770s

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 10
From: Lady Mary Hare
To: Thomas Plestow
Transfer Type in Chain: Purchase
Approx. Date / Period: c.1760s–1770s
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: By 10 Aug 1779 Plestow of Watlington Hall was requesting court books for Watlington and Tottenhill. Purchase deed itself not located.
Archive Ref / Object: BL/CS 4/57
Conflict / Caveat: Strong administration/possession evidence, not conveyance.
Missing Operative Instrument: Hare→Plestow lease & release / bargain & sale / mortgage / recovery / abstract.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/mr-plestow-watlington-hall-to-philip-case-asks-for-court-books-of-manors-of-watlington-and-tottenhill-as-he-declines-the-stewardship-with-list-of-court-books-receipted-by-henry-bell-10-aug-1779
Research Note: Search NRO HARE and Philip Case/BL solicitor papers, approx. 1760–1780.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 11: Thomas Plestow → Sir Thomas Berners Plestow · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · late 18th–early 19th c.

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 11
From: Thomas Plestow
To: Sir Thomas Berners Plestow
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: late 18th–early 19th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: No operative probate/settlement located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: Family succession from chain not independently instrumented here.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will/probate/settlement.
Priority: MEDIUM
Source URL: Search Prerogative Court and NRO family papers.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 12: Sir Thomas Berners Plestow → Charles Berners Plestow · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 19th c.

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 12
From: Sir Thomas Berners Plestow
To: Charles Berners Plestow
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: 19th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: No operative probate/settlement located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: Same.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will/probate/settlement.
Priority: MEDIUM
Source URL: Search probate and Watlington Hall estate abstracts.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 13: Charles Berners Plestow → Charles John Berners Plestow · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 19th c.

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 13
From: Charles Berners Plestow
To: Charles John Berners Plestow
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: 19th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: No operative probate/settlement located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: Same.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will/probate/settlement.
Priority: MEDIUM
Source URL: Search probate and estate papers.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 14: Charles John Berners Plestow → George Coote / 1869 purchaser · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 1869

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 14
From: Charles John Berners Plestow
To: George Coote / 1869 purchaser
Transfer Type in Chain: Sale
Approx. Date / Period: 1869
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: Actual Cambridge sale-particulars catalogue hit; Heritage Gateway confirms an 1869 sale map. Completion conveyance not yet located.
Archive Ref / Object: Cambridge Map Dept sale particulars; 1869 sale map
Conflict / Caveat: Sale material is strong but purchaser, lots and manorial-right clauses need the original particulars/plan.
Missing Operative Instrument: Executed conveyance/completion deed and annotated sale particulars.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://archivesearch.lib.cam.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/263073
Research Note: Order complete Cambridge item; trace auctioneer/solicitor papers and NRO deeds.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 15: George Coote → Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · late 19th/early 20th c.

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 15
From: George Coote
To: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: late 19th/early 20th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: No will/probate located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: 1883 directory confirms G. Coote as lord of Gawsels, but not the inheritance instrument.
Missing Operative Instrument: Coote will/probate/assent.
Priority: HIGH
Source URL: https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1883.shtml
Research Note: Search probate calendar/will and title abstracts.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 16: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys → Rev. Robert Holmes Edleston · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 1929

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 16
From: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys
To: Rev. Robert Holmes Edleston
Transfer Type in Chain: Purchase
Approx. Date / Period: 1929
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: Commercial title catalogue/user chain says 1929 sale. Durham archive proves Edleston's manorial conveyances and solicitor correspondence survive generally, but no Watlington-specific item was found.
Archive Ref / Object: Durham D/HH 8/2 comparator records
Conflict / Caveat: 1929 transfer remains unverified by actual instrument in this pass.
Missing Operative Instrument: Executed 1929 conveyance, contract, abstract of title, correspondence and schedule of deeds.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=
Research Note: Ask Durham to search D/HH and uncatalogued Holmes/Edleston papers by all manor aliases and Humphreys/Coote.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 17: R.H. Edleston estate / Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston / Crown → Probate / legal vesting stages · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · GAP

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 17
From: R.H. Edleston estate / Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston / Crown
To: Probate / legal vesting stages
Transfer Type in Chain: 1952–1966
Approx. Date / Period: GAP
Documentary Status: User chain provides legal sequence; this pass found only archive patterns/comparator instruments, not the Watlington-specific probate/court order.
Best Evidence Located: Durham Holmes solicitor archive — target
Archive Ref / Object: Do not infer title mechanics from generic Edleston files.
Conflict / Caveat: Probate, court order, statutory vesting/custody papers and schedules naming the manors.
Missing Operative Instrument: CRITICAL
Priority: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=
Source URL: Search D/HH solicitor files and probate registry by exact dates/names.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 18: Crown / Sarah estate → Eric R.H. Holmes & B.S.L.S. Raine, administrators de bonis non · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 31 May 1966

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 18
From: Crown / Sarah estate
To: Eric R.H. Holmes & B.S.L.S. Raine, administrators de bonis non
Transfer Type in Chain: Legal vesting / administration
Approx. Date / Period: 31 May 1966
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: Attached chain supplies date/role; no image or official item reference located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: Needs the grant/letters of administration and any schedule of manorial property.
Missing Operative Instrument: Letters of administration de bonis non + schedule.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: Search probate registry, Durham solicitor archive and Gazette notices.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 19: Administrators → Eric R.H. Holmes · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 1969–1977 sequence

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 19
From: Administrators
To: Eric R.H. Holmes
Transfer Type in Chain: Vesting assent / grant
Approx. Date / Period: 1969–1977 sequence
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: Attached chain states vesting assent; no Watlington-specific copy located.
Archive Ref / Object: Durham archive likely
Conflict / Caveat: Generic vesting-assent records exist in Holmes papers, but that is not proof of this transfer.
Missing Operative Instrument: Executed vesting assent and title schedule.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=
Research Note: Search D/HH by Eric Richard Hanby Holmes, Raine, Watlington and dates.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 20: Eric R.H. Holmes → Richard John Hanby Holmes · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 21 Dec 1977

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 20
From: Eric R.H. Holmes
To: Richard John Hanby Holmes
Transfer Type in Chain: Vesting
Approx. Date / Period: 21 Dec 1977
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: Attached chain supplies date; no operative document located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: Needs deed/assent or trust instrument.
Missing Operative Instrument: Executed vesting assent / declaration / schedule.
Priority: HIGH
Source URL: Search solicitor records and any retained title bundle.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Stage 21: Richard John Hanby Holmes → Crown / Olivia Mary Holmes sequence · Conveyance crosswalk — 2026-08-30 · 2016–2017

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 21
From: Richard John Hanby Holmes
To: Crown / Olivia Mary Holmes sequence
Transfer Type in Chain: Legal vesting / grant
Approx. Date / Period: 2016–2017
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: Attached chain gives sequence; no public instrument located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: Modern private conveyancing may not be publicly indexed by manor name.
Missing Operative Instrument: Assent/grant/deed and supporting legal correspondence.
Priority: HIGH
Source URL: Search retained private title bundle / solicitors / Crown correspondence if available.

Notes: ENRICH_MATCH_ONLY. No conveyance is created when no confident existing match is found.

Cumulative research narrative

[Unverified]

WATLINGTON COLTS / COLTES / TRUSSBUTS
MANORIAL RIGHTS RECONSTRUCTION — CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
Updated: 27 August 2026 — PASS 19 (cumulative; PASSES 1–18 preserved below)

PURPOSE
=======
Recover, document and trace every historically associated right, privilege, franchise,
profit, incident, burden and appurtenance connected with the manor known at different
times/forms as Watlington, Watlington Colts/Coltes, Watlington Trussbutts/Trusbuttes,
Trussbut's and Colt's Manor, and component estates which were bundled, split,
recombined or held in common ownership.

The method is document-by-document:
date -> instrument -> parties -> exact manor/style -> parcels -> rights expressly named
-> rights reserved -> rights extinguished/transformed -> successor instrument -> current
status.

IMPORTANT USER WORKING IDENTIFICATION
=====================================
The user identifies the 1506 "manor of Watlyngton" as the Watlington / Watlington-Colts /
Coltes / Trussbutts manorial complex, reflecting historic spelling and later bundling /
splitting / recombination of the estate.

This is therefore the working identification for this project unless a primary instrument
later proves that a 1506 Watlington manor was legally distinct.

CORE RULE
=========
Do NOT import a right from a neighbouring manor merely because Trussbut, Colt, Gawdy,
Hare or another common owner held both. Rights must be carried by an actual instrument,
custom, court record, reservation, award or defensible title chain.

However, because the project is specifically reconstructing a manor which has repeatedly
been bundled/split/recombined, every component has to be tested for later recombination.

========================================================================
A. TRUSSBUT SUCCESSION — CURRENT WORKING FLOW
========================================================================

For the Shouldham Trussbut/Colt manor:

THOMAS TRUSSBUT d.1451
|
+-- JOHN TRUSSBUT, elder son
| |
| +-- JANE TRUSSBUT, daughter/heir
|
+-- WILLIAM TRUSSBUT
|
+-- receives the Shouldham manor/lands
+-- dies without issue
|
v
JANE TRUSSBUT
niece of William
daughter of John
|
= THOMAS COLT
|
v
COLT LINE

The important correction to the 2025 auction catalogue/title history is that it compresses
the manor succession into Thomas -> John -> Jane. Parkin/Blomefield's Shouldham account
instead inserts WILLIAM as the intervening holder of the Shouldham Trussbut/Colt manor
before it comes to Jane after William dies s.p.

The 2025 material should therefore be treated as a lead/source-finder, not as authority
where it conflicts with earlier evidence.

SOURCE:
Feudal Titles / Manorial Services auction-history page:
https://feudaltitles.com/titles-index-u-z

========================================================================
B. 1506 FINAL CONCORD — DIRECT RIGHTS BUNDLE
========================================================================

DATE:
8 July 1506

RECORD:
CP 25/1/170/197, no.106

WORKING MANOR IDENTIFICATION:
Watlyngton = Watlington / Watlington Colts / Coltes / Trussbutts complex.

RIGHTS / PROPERTY EXPRESSLY INCLUDED:
- the manor of Watlyngton
- 200 acres land
- 20 acres meadow
- 40 acres pasture
- 10 acres wood
- 16 shillings rent
- ONE FREE FOLD
- ADVOWSON OF ST PETER OF WATLINGTON

SIGNIFICANCE:
This is presently one of the strongest direct early-Tudor rights bundles in the manor
chain. The free fold and advowson should now be tracked forward instrument-by-instrument.

ONLINE ABSTRACT:
https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_170_197.shtml

ORIGINAL MEMBRANE IMAGE / AALT:
https://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT4/CP251/CP251no170/IMG_0159.htm

STATUS:
[Verified at online primary-image / scholarly abstract level]
The original membrane is exposed online.

========================================================================
C. MEDIEVAL WATLINGTON TITLE PEDIGREE / SHULDHAM MUNIMENTS
========================================================================

A major source is the Norfolk Archaeology article:

"Notes on a Pedigree temp. Henry VI., showing the title of Thomas Shuldham, Esq.,
to the Manor of Watlington"

This preserves a Henry VI-period title statement for Thomas Shuldham and coparceners to
the Manor of Watlington, and also prints/transcribes medieval deeds connecting Shuldham
and Trussbut landholding.

Important documentary links include:

1) 1373:
Shouldham land moving from the Shuldham family to Thomas, son of Nicholas Trussbut.

2) 1386:
Agnes de Shuldham releasing claim to the same land / Trussbut estate additions.

This materially strengthens the model that Watlington and Shouldham title streams were
interacting through actual medieval muniments rather than merely through later surname
coincidence.

DOWNLOAD / SOURCE:
Internet Archive volume:
https://archive.org/details/norfolkarchaeol02socigoog

Full PDF:
https://archive.org/download/norfolkarchaeol02socigoog/norfolkarchaeol02socigoog.pdf

OCR text:
https://archive.org/stream/norfolkarchaeol02socigoog/norfolkarchaeol02socigoog_djvu.txt

STATUS:
[Secondary publication reproducing/transcribing older muniments]
Original muniments still preferable where identifiable.

========================================================================
D. NORFOLK RECORD OFFICE TRUSSBUT TARGETS
========================================================================

The medieval Trussbut evidence now separates into at least three key NRO references:

HARE 2493
---------
Modern scholarship uses this for Laurence Trussbut holding over 330 acres in
Shouldham, Shouldham Thorpe and Fincham IN ADDITION TO the Trussbut manor at Shouldham.

HARE 2683
HARE 2684
---------
Used for additions to the Trussbut estate in Shouldham in 1386.

IMPORTANT:
Do not collapse HARE 2493 and HARE 2683-2684 into one reference.
They appear to evidence different aspects of Trussbut estate formation.

DOWNLOAD STATUS:
No direct digitised NRO scan located in this pass.
Archive retrieval still required.

NRO catalogue root:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/

========================================================================
E. TITTLESHALL ALIAS TRUSBUTTS COURT BOOK
========================================================================

A surviving court book has been identified for:

"Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall Manor"

DATE RANGE:
1622-1785

ACCESSION / LEAD:
ACC 2002/145 (needs final NRO catalogue reference verified)

WHY IMPORTANT:
This may contain:
- admissions/surrenders
- heriots
- fines
- rents
- customs
- common rights
- foldcourse/foldage
- highways
- encroachments
- drains/dykes
- minerals/quarrying references
- sporting/warren rights
- manorial boundary evidence

NATIONAL ARCHIVES ACCESSIONS PAGE:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/accessions/2002/02digests/manorial.htm

STATUS:
[Archive catalogue lead]
No complete downloadable court-book scan found yet.

========================================================================
F. HARE 2495 — 1633 FIELD BOOK
========================================================================

NRO HARE 2495 is still the best known physical snapshot of Colt's/Trussbutt's estate.

Historic England summarises it as recording:
- capital messuage/manor house
- Colt's close
- about six acres for manor house + close
- four tenements with yards
- alder carr of nearly seven acres
- Appletons, wooded close, about five acres
- tenants occupying the manor/farm, carr and Appletons
- location by Beerway, street and market place

SOURCE / OFFICIAL SUMMARY:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446

STATUS:
[Verified via official heritage record]
Full NRO field book not yet downloaded/inspected.

========================================================================
G. 1587 / 1596 COLT -> SHOULDHAM / SHULDHAM PROBLEM
========================================================================

Historic England places:
George Colt -> Thomas Shouldham in 1587
then shortly:
Thomas Shouldham -> Judge Gawdy

The 2025 auction/title history instead refers to a 1596 conveyance of:
"the manor of Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes"
with appurtenances and property in multiple parishes.

CURRENT VIEW:
The 1596 reference remains highly important but the original instrument must be found.
Possible explanations:
- confirmation
- settlement
- final concord
- common recovery
- later assurance
- conveyance of additional/recombined property
- catalogue dating error

DO NOT discard the 1596 reference.
DO NOT treat it as proved until the underlying instrument is located.

SOURCES:
Historic England:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446

2025 auction/title-history lead:
https://feudaltitles.com/titles-index-u-z

========================================================================
H. SHOULDHAM PRIORY MANOR — SEPARATE BUT LATER COMMON OWNERSHIP
========================================================================

NRO HARE 2719
DATE:
12 December 1587

LEAD:
Royal letters patent/licence relating to alienation from Sir Thomas Mildmay to Francis
Gawdy and others.

Historically associated rights in this Priory-manor stream include leads for:
- two fold liberties / foldcourse
- tolls
- stallage
- rectory interests
- advowsons of St Margaret and All Saints, Shouldham
- rents / court perquisites

IMPORTANT:
These are NOT automatically Colts rights.
They become relevant if a later deed expressly combines them or if a right is shown to
have been transferred into the Colts title stream.

FULL ORIGINAL:
Not yet exposed/downloaded.

========================================================================
I. SHOULDHAM WARREN — 1634 DOCUMENT LEAD
========================================================================

Norfolk Historic Environment material identifies a Shouldham Warren lease in 1634 and
states that the tenant was required to supply rabbits to the household.

SIGNIFICANCE:
A warren is precisely the kind of manorial/profit right which could matter historically
and, depending on later reservations and statutory survival, potentially into modern
property law.

This is only two years after the Hare acquisition/unification phase c.1632.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS:
- who is named as lessor?
- exact parcel/manor?
- is "warren" an express franchise/right or merely place-name/land use?
- what sporting/game rights are reserved?
- did later leases reserve them to Hare?

SOURCE LEAD:
Norfolk Heritage Explorer / Shouldham Warren material.
General NHER site:
https://www.heritage.norfolk.gov.uk/

Exact archive document reference still to recover.

STATUS:
[Official local heritage lead; original lease not yet inspected]

========================================================================
J. 1943 FORESTRY COMMISSION LEASE — MODERN SPORTING-RIGHTS LEAD
========================================================================

This is one of the strongest modern rights leads found so far.

Forestry Commission's Shouldham Forest Plan states:
- Forestry Commission management began in 1943
- under a 999-year lease from the Hare Estate at Stow Bardolph
- SPORTING RIGHTS WERE RETAINED BY THE ESTATE
- those rights were being exercised in the Shouldham Sincks area

SIGNIFICANCE:
This materially upgrades sporting rights from "legally possible but factually unproved"
to:
[Verified modern evidence of sporting-right reservation by the Hare Estate over at least
part of the Shouldham woodland estate.]

CRITICAL LIMIT:
This does NOT yet prove those sporting rights were appurtenant to the Colts lordship.
They may have been severed freehold/estate rights.

NEXT DOCUMENT:
Recover the actual 1943 lease.

STATUS:
[Verified via official Forestry Commission plan]
[Exact 1943 lease still missing]

========================================================================
K. MARKET / FAIR RIGHTS
========================================================================

Evidence has strengthened beyond the 1633 phrase "market place".

The VCH / national market-gazetteer material records Shouldham as a PRESCRIPTIVE MARKET
by 1334.

Later nineteenth-century directories record two annual livestock fairs continuing into
the nineteenth century.

SIGNIFICANCE:
A real market/fair rights stream existed historically at Shouldham.

UNRESOLVED:
Which manor owned/exercised the franchise?
Possibilities include:
- Colts/Trussbutts
- Priory manor
- another Shouldham component

Do not assign it to Colts until ownership is proved.

VCH / British History Online:
https://www.british-history.ac.uk/

========================================================================
L. WATLINGTON INCLOSURE — 1749
========================================================================

A Watlington-specific inclosure Act exists:

Watlington Inclosure Act 1748
22 Geo. II private c.37
Royal Assent: 26 May 1749

TITLE:
An Act for enclosing and dividing certain Commons and Wastes, within the Manor and
Parish of Watlington, in the County of Norfolk.

SIGNIFICANCE:
The previous investigation over-focused on the 1794 Shouldham enclosure.

The Watlington/Colts reconstruction must now run TWO separate enclosure regimes:

1) WATLINGTON — 1749
Potentially affecting:
- commons
- wastes
- lord's allotments
- common rights
- ownership of waste
- roads
- drains
- possibly mineral reservations
- fold-related rights

2) SHOULDHAM / SHOULDHAM THORPE — 1794-1798
affecting:
- common fields
- half-year lands
- lammas meadows
- commons
- wastes
- allotments
- roads
- drains
- fences
- rules/orders

CURRENT PROBLEM:
The full 1749 Act / award / map has NOT yet been recovered online in this pass.

NEXT:
Trace Parliamentary Archives and NRO award/map/commissioners' papers.

========================================================================
M. SHOULDHAM / SHOULDHAM THORPE INCLOSURE 1794-1798
========================================================================

1794 Act:
Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe (Norfolk) Inclosure Act 1794
34 Geo III private c.85

The commissioners were replacing:
- common-field rights
- half-year rights
- fen rights
- lammas rights
- heath/common/waste rights
with statutory allotments and rules.

A surviving 1798 schedule has been identified:
"Schedule of the public allotments, public, private and bridle roads, footpaths, drain,
fences, rules, orders, &c."

The surviving copy also contains a manuscript licence to fell timber signed by
Thomas Hare.

SIGNIFICANCE:
This schedule is first-tier evidence for:
- roads
- drain
- fences
- public/private rights
- allotments
- estate obligations
- transformed common rights

DOWNLOADABLE PDF LEAD:
https://assets.cengage.com/gale/psm/1005000R.pdf

STATUS:
[Downloadable derivative/document scan]
Need to verify provenance/page completeness against archive original.

========================================================================
N. 1811-1818 AND 1851 HARE ESTATE MAPPING
========================================================================

HARE 6832
---------
Hare estate map, 1811-1818.
Historic England uses this to identify Colts Farm / scheduled area.

FULL NRO ORIGINAL:
Not yet downloaded.

OFFICIAL SUMMARY:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446

HARE 5186, 231x2
----------------
July 1851
Plan of the entire parishes of:
- Stow Bardolph
- Downham
- Wimbotsham
- Shouldham
- Shouldham Thorpe
- Marham
showing the Stow Hall estate.

DOWNLOADABLE ONLINE DERIVATIVE / EXTRACT:
https://townmaps.history.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/22536.pdf

CATALOGUE PAGE:
https://townmaps.history.ac.uk/townmap/norfolk-downham-market-1851/

STATUS:
[Downloadable historical-map derivative]
Archive original remains NRO HARE 5186, 231x2.

========================================================================
O. HARE 5466 — LATE NINETEENTH-CENTURY ESTATE SCHEDULE
========================================================================

NRO HARE 5466, 222 x 5
From 1871 / post-1874 estate schedule context.

Important because Colts Farm remains separately identifiable among Hare estate farms.

SIGNIFICANCE:
Potential severance evidence:
physical Colts estate may have remained Hare property even if an incorporeal lordship
was later transferred separately.

NATIONAL ARCHIVES DISCOVERY / RELATED HARE COLLECTION:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Exact item-level download not yet found.

========================================================================
P. CURRENT RIGHTS LEDGER
========================================================================

RIGHT / PRIVILEGE CURRENT STATUS
---------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------

Lordship/name Plausible survivor; present deed/chain required.

Capital messuage/manor house Historically proved physical land; not automatic
with lordship.

Colts Farm / closes / tenements Historically proved; modern ownership/severance
requires title mapping.

16s rent (1506) Directly documented historically. Modern survival
not proved.

One free fold (1506) DIRECTLY DOCUMENTED in the working manor chain.
Trace forward.

1.5 foldage Separately documented in Kervile/Watlington
material; test for later recombination.

Foldcourse / fold liberties Strong wider evidence. Exact Colts continuity
not yet fully proved.

Advowson St Peter, Watlington DIRECTLY DOCUMENTED in 1506 working manor chain.
Later ecclesiastical/title history required.

Shouldham advowsons Priory-manor stream unless later combined.

Market/fair Historical Shouldham market/fair now materially
evidenced. Ownership manor unresolved.

Tolls/stallage Priory-manor lead; do not assign automatically.

Warren / rabbits 1634 Shouldham Warren document lead.
Potentially important.

Sporting rights MODERN HARE ESTATE reservation evidenced in
Forestry Commission material (1943 lease context).
Exact relationship to Colts title unresolved.

Fishery/piscary Possible historical category; direct Colts chain
still unproved.

Mines/minerals Highest-value legally preservable category.
No direct Colts reservation yet found.

Clay/stone/gravel/quarries Same.

Rights of entry/search/work minerals Same.

Commons/waste Substantially affected by 1749 Watlington and
1794 Shouldham enclosure regimes.

Lammas / half-year rights 1794 Shouldham enclosure transformation.

Roads/ways Enclosure schedule evidence; individual rights
may survive depending on award/title.

Drainage/ditches 1798 schedule specifically mentions drain.
Could be surviving right OR burden.

Heriots/fines/reliefs/copyhold incidents Historic; compensable manorial incidents ultimately
extinguished under twentieth-century legislation.

Court baron/leet jurisdiction Historic evidence in related manors; judicial
power no longer exercisable as historic manor court.

Village green control Not established by lordship alone.

========================================================================
Q. LEGAL SURVIVAL FRAMEWORK
========================================================================

Do not confuse:
1) existence of the historic right;
2) ownership/severance of the right;
3) statutory survival after enfranchisement;
4) priority against today's registered parcel.

Potentially surviving categories include:
- mines and minerals
- limestone/lime/clay/stone/gravel
- pits/quarries
- ancillary entry/search/working rights
- fairs and markets
- chase and warren
- piscary
- hunting/shooting/fishing/fowling
- certain drainage/works liabilities

HMLR Practice Guide 22:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/manors/practice-guide-22-manors

HMLR Practice Guide 66:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013/practice-guide-66-overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013

HMLR Practice Guide 13:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/official-searches-of-the-index-of-relating-franchises-and-manors/practice-guide-13-official-searches-of-the-index-of-relating-franchises-and-manors

IMPORTANT:
Failure to register before 13 October 2013 did not automatically extinguish every valid
manorial right, but priority may later be lost against purchasers for value depending on
registration history.

A register notice does not itself prove the right exists.

========================================================================
R. HIGHEST PRIORITY DOCUMENT RETRIEVAL LIST
========================================================================

1. Current Watlington Colts/Trussbutts conveyance + complete abstract/epitome.
2. 1587 George Colt -> Thomas Shouldham instrument.
3. Alleged 1596 "Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes" instrument.
4. Thomas Trussbut will/testamentary disposition, 1451.
5. HARE 2493.
6. HARE 2683.
7. HARE 2684.
8. Tittleshall alias Trusbutts court book 1622-1785.
9. HARE 2495 full 1633 field book.
10. 1634 Shouldham Warren lease.
11. HARE 2719 full 1587 Priory-manor transaction.
12. Watlington 1749 inclosure Act, award, map, claims and commissioners' papers.
13. Shouldham 1794 Act + award + map + 1798 schedule.
14. HARE 6832 full 1811-1818 estate map.
15. 1843 tithe map/apportionment.
16. HARE 5186 231x2 full 1851 estate plan.
17. HARE 5466 estate schedule.
18. Actual 1943 Hare Estate -> Forestry Commission 999-year lease.
19. HMLR manorial/franchise index search.
20. Current/historic parcel registers, filed deeds and former-copyhold enfranchisements.

========================================================================
S. DOWNLOAD / URL LEDGER
========================================================================

DIRECT / DOWNLOADABLE OR OPENABLE DOCUMENTS
-------------------------------------------

1506 Watlyngton final concord abstract:
https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_170_197.shtml

1506 original membrane image:
https://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT4/CP251/CP251no170/IMG_0159.htm

Norfolk Archaeology volume containing Shuldham/Watlington pedigree + medieval deeds:
https://archive.org/details/norfolkarchaeol02socigoog

Direct PDF:
https://archive.org/download/norfolkarchaeol02socigoog/norfolkarchaeol02socigoog.pdf

OCR text:
https://archive.org/stream/norfolkarchaeol02socigoog/norfolkarchaeol02socigoog_djvu.txt

1851 Hare estate map derivative:
https://townmaps.history.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/22536.pdf

1851 map catalogue:
https://townmaps.history.ac.uk/townmap/norfolk-downham-market-1851/

1798 Shouldham enclosure schedule PDF lead:
https://assets.cengage.com/gale/psm/1005000R.pdf

Historic England / Colt's manor + HARE 2495 / HARE 6832 official summary:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446

2025 auction/title-history lead:
https://feudaltitles.com/titles-index-u-z

NRO online catalogue root:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/

National Archives manorial accession digest:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/accessions/2002/02digests/manorial.htm

National Archives Discovery:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Norfolk Heritage Explorer:
https://www.heritage.norfolk.gov.uk/

HMLR PG22:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/manors/practice-guide-22-manors

HMLR PG66:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013/practice-guide-66-overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013

HMLR PG13:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/official-searches-of-the-index-of-relating-franchises-and-manors/practice-guide-13-official-searches-of-the-index-of-relating-franchises-and-manors

========================================================================
T. NEW FINDINGS FROM THIS PASS — SUMMARY
========================================================================

1. 1506 CP25/1/170/197 no.106 is now treated under the working identification as
Watlington-Colts/Coltes/Trussbutts.
Direct rights bundle includes ONE FREE FOLD + ST PETER ADVOWSON + 16s RENT.

2. The ORIGINAL 1506 final-concord membrane is exposed online via AALT and is now
permanently recorded.

3. Norfolk Archaeology vol. VI preserves a Henry VI-period title pedigree for Thomas
Shuldham to the manor of Watlington and medieval deeds connecting Shuldham -> Trussbut
landholding in 1373/1386.

4. HARE 2493 must be kept separate from HARE 2683-2684:
HARE 2493 = >330 acres / Laurence Trussbut holding context.
HARE 2683-2684 = 1386 Trussbut estate additions.

5. Tittleshall alias Trusbutts court book 1622-1785 remains a major uninspected
custom/right source.

6. 1634 Shouldham Warren lease identified as a major rights-bearing document target.

7. Forestry Commission material shows a 1943 999-year lease from Hare Estate and
EXPRESS RETENTION OF SPORTING RIGHTS by the estate.
This is currently the strongest modern rights reservation lead.

8. Shouldham market/fair stream is materially stronger:
prescriptive market by 1334 + later annual fairs.
Franchise ownership still unresolved.

9. Downloadable 1851 Hare estate map derivative located, NRO HARE 5186 231x2.

10. 1749 Watlington inclosure remains a critical missing primary award/map trail.

========================================================================
U. NEXT PASS
========================================================================

Continue with:
- identify/download the 1943 Hare-Forestry lease if possible;
- recover the 1634 Warren lease reference/full text;
- locate full 1749 Watlington enclosure legislation and award/map;
- identify the original 1596 "Watlington Coltes or Trusbuttes" instrument;
- search for Thomas Trussbut 1451 will/probate original;
- determine whether John Trussbut mercer d.1439 is the elder son/father of Jane;
- search NRO catalogue mirrors / TNA accessions for HARE 2493, 2683, 2684;
- trace the 1506 free fold and St Peter advowson into later Watlington/Colt instruments;
- identify whether the market/fair/warren rights were Colts, Priory, or another
component before later Hare consolidation.

========================================================================
V. PASS 3 — BACKUP / LOSS CHECK
========================================================================

[Verified against the two uploaded local copies]

The uploaded PASS 2 handover and the pasted backup were cross-checked before continuing.
No substantive research finding, archival reference, right, or URL was found to be missing
from the PASS 2 handover.

The pasted backup differed only in two non-substantive wording choices:
- "because the project is specifically reconstructing..." versus "because the user is..."
- "treated under the working identification..." versus "treated under the user's working
identification..."

PASS 3 therefore continues from PASS 2 rather than rebuilding it.

========================================================================
W. 1427 INQUISITION POST MORTEM — DIRECT TRUSBUT / WATLINGTON FEE
========================================================================

DATE / INQUISITION:
4 May 1427, King's Lynn, Norfolk
Inquisition for Thomas, Duke of Exeter
Published digital edition: Mapping the Medieval Countryside, E-CIPM 22-791.

UNDERLYING ARCHIVE REFERENCE:
The National Archives, C 139/30/56, membranes 13 and 15.

CRITICAL TEXT / HOLDINGS:
The Norfolk inquisition records:

"Watlington, Tottenhill, Garbodesthorp, Setchey and ?Longham,
a knight's fee which Thomas Trusbut and his parceners hold."

The same inquisition separately records:
"Watlington, 1/4 knight's fee which Robert Kervyle holds."

SOURCE / OPENABLE DIGITAL EDITION:
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/22-791/index.html

Specific Norfolk section:
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/22-791/794.html

STATUS:
[Verified via scholarly digital edition identifying the underlying TNA membrane.]

SIGNIFICANCE:
1. This is direct medieval record evidence placing THOMAS TRUSBUT and his parceners
in an actual knight's-fee holding that expressly includes WATLINGTON.
2. It materially strengthens the Trusbut-Watlington title stream independently of the
2025 auction narrative.
3. It also proves that Watlington contained at least two separate fee interests in this
inquisition: the Trusbut/parceners fee and Robert Kervyle's quarter-fee.
4. This is an important warning against treating every medieval "Watlington" tenure,
manor or right as a single undivided estate.

[Inference]
The Thomas Trusbut in the 1427 inquisition may be the Thomas Trussbut later associated
with the 1451 succession, but this identification is NOT yet proved by the 1427 record
alone.

CRITICAL NEXT CHAIN:
1427 Trusbut fee in Watlington
->
1451 Thomas Trussbut succession / testamentary material
->
William / John / Jane Trussbut succession
->
Colt line
->
later Watlington Colts / Trusbutts instruments

This is now one of the strongest medieval anchors for the reconstruction.

========================================================================
X. 1506 FINAL CONCORD — PARTIES NOW RECORDED + IMPORTANT CHAIN GAP
========================================================================

The PASS 2 rights bundle remains:

CP 25/1/170/197, no.106
8 July 1506

- manor of Watlyngton
- 1 messuage
- 200 acres land
- 20 acres meadow
- 40 acres pasture
- 10 acres wood
- 16 shillings rent
- ONE FREE FOLD
- ADVOWSON OF ST PETER OF WATLINGTON

PASS 3 ADDITION — PARTIES:
QUERENTS:
- Henry Wyatt, esquire
- Richard Wyatt, clerk
- Reynold Pegge

DEFORCIANTS:
- Robert Pynkeney
- Elizabeth his wife

The agreement records the tenements as acknowledged to be the right of Henry Wyatt;
consideration stated in the abstract: £100.

ABSTRACT:
https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_170_197.shtml

ORIGINAL MEMBRANE IMAGE:
https://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT4/CP251/CP251no170/IMG_0159.htm

STATUS:
[Verified at digital abstract/original-image level.]

IMPORTANT NEW CAUTION:
The named parties are Wyatt / Pegge / Pynkeney, not Colt or Trusbut.

The project continues to use the user's working identification that this 1506 "manor of
Watlyngton" is part of the Watlington-Colts/Trusbutts complex unless primary evidence
shows otherwise. However, PASS 3 makes the missing chain into a specific test:

HOW, IF AT ALL, does the earlier Trusbut/Colt interest connect to the
Pynkeney -> Wyatt/Pegge fine of 1506?

Possible mechanisms such as feoffees-to-uses, settlement or a separate Watlington manor
must NOT be assumed without an instrument.

PRIORITY:
Find the preceding conveyance/settlement/estate evidence that explains why these parties
were dealing with the manor carrying the free fold and St Peter advowson in 1506.

========================================================================
Y. NRO HARE TRANSCRIPTION LEADS — 1586 TO 1611
========================================================================

A downloadable family-history research PDF preserves useful transcriptions / abstracts of
Norfolk Record Office HARE material. It is SECONDARY and must be used as an archive-finder,
not as a substitute for the originals.

SOURCE:
https://fhhighfields.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/godbould.pdf

IMPORTANT ENTRIES:

20 April 1586
NRO HARE 3080/7, 201 x 5
Fine involving Thomas Gawsell and Richard Godbould against Thomas Harpley junior and
Dorothy, concerning lands in Garboysthorpe, Foston, Runcton, Stradsett, Fincham,
Crimplesham and elsewhere.

11 November 1586
NRO HARE 975, 190 x 4
Charles Cornwallis -> Thomas Gawsell of Watlington, Richard Godbold of Wallington and
Jasper Blake of Wimbotsham.
The abstract lists manors including Fincham, Banyardes Hall, Lytlewelhall, Grandcortes,
Brancester Hall and appurtenances extending through places including Shouldham,
Shouldham Thorpe, Marham, Stradsett and Barton Bendish.

12 December 1587
NRO HARE 2719, 198 x 4
Licence to alienate Thomas Myldmay -> Francis Gawdy, Richard Godbould and John Moundeforde.
The Shouldham manor package is abstracted with:
- liberty of TWO FOLDS
- rectory
- merchants' tolls
- stallage
- advowsons of St Margaret and All Saints
- appurtenances including Wallington, Thorpeland and Rowghtonholme
- Great Seal

IMPORTANT:
This remains a SHOULDHAM PRIORY-MANOR stream unless a later instrument proves that these
rights became part of Colts/Trusbutts.

9 September 1590
NRO HARE 979, 190 x 4
Feoffment by Thomas Gawsell, Richard Godbould and Jasper Blake to Francis Gawdy and
John Mondeford, with a wide manor/appurtenance package extending into Shouldham and
Shouldham Thorpe.

24 August 1611
NRO reference not supplied in the secondary PDF.
Richard Godbould of Fincham -> Sir John Peyton, Sir William Tate, Francis Tate and
John Courteman.
Property described as:
"Manor of Tittishall or Tyttyshall hall or Tyttleshall hall or Trusbutes"
with appurtenances in Holme, Rungton Holme / Rowghton Holme, Wallington and Thorpeland,
plus land in Buckton/Bowton.

[Inference]
The 1611 "Trusbutes" wording and geographic overlap is important when testing the later
Trusbutts naming, but it MUST NOT yet be merged with Watlington Colts. It may instead be
the distinct Tittleshall alias Trusbutts manor represented by the surviving 1622-1785
court book.

NEW ARCHIVE TARGETS FROM THIS SOURCE:
- HARE 3080/7
- HARE 975
- HARE 979
- original reference for the 24 August 1611 "Tittishall ... Trusbutes" deed

========================================================================
Z. 1867 NOTES & QUERIES — WATLINGTON COURT-ROLL TRAILS
========================================================================

A digitised 1867 issue of Notes and Queries contains an antiquarian correspondent's
discussion of the Butts family based on an exceptionally large private record collection.

DOWNLOADABLE SOURCE:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/Notes_and_queries_IA_notesqueries03unse_0.pdf

REPORTED COLLECTION:
The correspondent states that "many thousand" deeds and court rolls, from the time of
King John and Henry III, relating to the Shouldhams and neighbouring parishes were in
his custody.

DIRECTLY RELEVANT COURT-ROLL NOTICES REPORTED THERE:
- William Butts held court jure uxoris for "Gawsells M. in Watlington",
34 Henry VIII.
- In 32 Henry VIII, William Butts held his first court for the
"M. of West Derham Abbey in Watlington" as farmer of the King.
- William Butts died 10 Elizabeth; a Shouldham court roll is cited.
- William Butts held his first court for his manor in Garbesthorp,
late Gawsells, 27 September, 11 Elizabeth.
- Garbesthorp is expressly glossed as Shouldham Thorpe.

STATUS:
[Verified as a digitised antiquarian printed source / OCR retrieval.]
The underlying privately held medieval and early-modern deeds/court rolls described by
the correspondent have NOT yet been located.

SIGNIFICANCE:
1. This is a new court-roll route for WATLINGTON itself.
2. It identifies at least two distinct court/manor streams there:
- Gawsells Manor in Watlington
- West Dereham Abbey manor in Watlington
3. It reinforces the need to separate these from Colts/Trusbutts until an actual
recombination or transfer is proved.
4. The reported private collection could be extraordinarily important if its later
provenance can be identified.

NEW PRIORITY:
Identify the 1867 correspondent/collector and trace the destination, sale or deposit of
the "many thousand" Shouldham-area deeds and court rolls.

========================================================================
AA. JOHN TRUSSBUT, MERCER, d.1439 — PROB 11/3 CANDIDATE
========================================================================

A scholarly Royal Holloway thesis identifies:

JOHN TRUSSBUT
- mercer
- estates in Norfolk
- died 1439
- requested a marble tomb with a brass at St Thomas of Acre, London

DIRECT PDF:
https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/19528031/STEER_Burial_and_Commemoration_in_Medieval_London_c_1140_1540.pdf

SAFE ARCHIVE REFERENCE:
The National Archives, PROB 11/3.

CORRECTION / FOLIATION CONFLICT:
One academic source gives:
PROB 11/3, ff. 88r-88v.

Another academic source gives:
PROB 11/3, ff. 211-212v.

Therefore PASS 3 records PROB 11/3 as the safe piece reference, but DOES NOT treat either
folio citation as resolved until the original probate volume/catalogue is checked.

CORRECTION TO PASS-3 LIVE UPDATE:
The earlier live update described ff. 88r-88v as an exact citation. That was too strong.
The conflicting academic foliation means only PROB 11/3 is presently safe.

IDENTITY STATUS:
[Unverified]
It is NOT yet proved that this John Trussbut is:
- Thomas Trussbut's elder son,
- Jane Trussbut's father,
or
- the John in the Shouldham/Watlington succession.

WHY HE REMAINS IMPORTANT:
A John Trussbut dying in 1439, a London mercer with Norfolk estates, is chronologically
and geographically important enough that the will must be obtained and tested for:
- wife
- children
- brothers
- Norfolk manor/place names
- executors
- feoffees
- residual heirs
- charitable bequests tied to Norfolk property

========================================================================
AB. 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN — LEASE EVIDENCE STRENGTHENED
========================================================================

Norfolk Heritage Explorer has a dedicated rabbit-warren article.

DIRECT PAGE:
https://www.heritage.norfolk.gov.uk/record-details?TNF2329-Rabbit-Warrens-Article=

The article states that:
- ownership of a warren was a manorial privilege;
- the Hare Estate field book of 1626 refers to a "conywarren" at Wimbotsham;
- leases such as the SHOULDHAM WARREN lease of 1634 stipulated numbers of rabbits to
be supplied to the household.

STATUS:
[Verified at official local-heritage secondary-source level.]
The underlying 1634 lease archive reference and scan are STILL MISSING.

ADDITIONAL LOCAL CONTEXT:
https://www.explorewestnorfolk.co.uk/trails/shouldham-warren-walk-22/

This is context only and is not a substitute for the lease.

TARGET:
Find the 1634 lease itself and extract:
- lessor
- lessee
- precise land/manor
- rabbit quota
- reservation of game/sporting rights
- right of entry
- duration
- rent
- successors/assigns
- archive reference

========================================================================
AC. 1943 HARE ESTATE -> FORESTRY COMMISSION LEASE
========================================================================

OFFICIAL FORESTRY ENGLAND PLAN — DIRECT PDF:
https://www.forestryengland.uk/sites/default/files/documents/ShouldhamandBilneyForestPlan2016-2026_0.pdf

The official plan records:
- Forestry Commission management beginning in 1943;
- the beginning of a 999-year lease from the Hare Estate at Stow Bardolph;
- Shouldham Warren and Shouldham Sincks in the leasehold;
- SPORTING RIGHTS retained by the Hare Estate;
- the plan states they were exercised in the Sincks area;
- other estate/property constraints include access and utility wayleaves.

STATUS:
[Verified in an official modern estate-management source.]
The ACTUAL 1943 lease remains missing.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
This proves a Hare Estate reservation of sporting rights over at least part of the
Shouldham woodland leasehold. It does NOT by itself prove those sporting rights were
incorporeal rights appurtenant to the Lordship of Watlington Colts/Trusbutts.

ADDITIONAL CORROBORATING PLANNING PDF:
https://norfolk.oc2.uk/docfiles/58/B1SilicaSandTopicPaper2022.pdf

PRIORITY:
Recover the 1943 lease and any later supplemental deed/variation to establish:
- exact demised parcels
- sporting reservation wording
- mineral reservation wording
- timber rights
- access/entry rights
- assignment
- whether rights were retained by the Hare Estate generally or a named manor/title

========================================================================
AD. 1596 COLT -> SHOULDHAM AND 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE — PASS 3 STATUS
========================================================================

1596:
The auction/title narrative was rechecked. It expressly states that Sir George Colt's
Watlington Colts was leased in 1581 and sold to Thomas Schuldham/Shouldham in 1596,
describing the conveyance as including:

"the manor of Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes"
with appurtenances in Watlyngton and messuages, lands and tenements in:
- Rongton Holme
- Thorpland
- Watlington
- Totnell
- Seche
- Secheth
- Wigenhall St Mary Magdalen
- Wigenhall St Peters
- Wigenhall St Germans
- Wigenhall St Maryes
- Terrington
- Mershlonde

SOURCE:
https://feudaltitles.com/titles-index-u-z

STATUS:
[Secondary/auction-title source only.]
The underlying 1596 instrument remains NOT FOUND.

Historic England's 1587 dating remains a conflicting/alternative title-history lead.
Therefore the original 1587/1596 assurance(s) remain mandatory retrieval targets.

1749:
The existence/title of the Watlington inclosure legislation remains supported, but PASS 3
did NOT recover a full primary copy of the Norfolk Act, award or map.

GENUKI locality/source page:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/

Downloadable historical bibliography/source:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/The_Norfolk_topographers_manual-_being_a_catalogue_of_the_books_and_engravings_hitherto_published_in_relation_to_the_county_IA_b29349734.pdf

IMPORTANT:
Search results for "Watlington Inclosure" are heavily contaminated by Watlington,
Oxfordshire. Do not import Oxfordshire awards/maps into this Norfolk project.

========================================================================
AE. OTHER PASS 3 SOURCE LEADS
========================================================================

TNA E 179 — 1664 Hearth Tax / Clackclose Hundred
Open catalogue/details page:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/e179/details.asp?doc_id=25512&doc_ref=E17925345&piece_id=26860

The listed geography includes Shouldham, Shouldham Thorpe, Wallington, Thorpland,
Runcton Holme and Watlington.

USE:
Useful for post-1632 occupier/estate footprint reconstruction, but not itself proof of
a particular manorial right.

SHOULDHAM CONSERVATION AREA — WEST NORFOLK COUNCIL PDF:
https://www.west-norfolk.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/1928/shouldham_conservation_area_leaflet.pdf

USE:
Official local historical context / source-finder.

NICHOLAS TRUSBUT OF SHOULDHAM — MILITARY PARDON DATABASE PDF:
https://www.medievalsoldier.org/about/miscellanea/introduction-military-pardons-database-for-1345-and-1359/Military-Pardons_1359-1.pdf

This provides person/place context for Nicholas Trusbut of Shouldham in a 1360 pardon
record. It is NOT a manorial-right instrument.

LAURENCE TRUSBUT — SUFFOLK INSTITUTE PDF:
https://suffolkinstitute.pdfsrv.co.uk/customers/SuffolkInstitute/2014/01/10/VolumeXXXPart31966_ThestewardshipLibertyEightandahalfHundredAGreen_255to262.pdf

This supplies administrative/person context for Laurence Trusbut in 1397.
It is NOT itself evidence that a specific Watlington Colts right existed.

========================================================================
AF. PASS 3 — UPDATED RIGHTS / TITLE IMPLICATIONS
========================================================================

1. TRUSBUT TENURE IN WATLINGTON
Status upgraded:
[Verified via edited 1427 IPM]
Thomas Trusbut and parceners held a knight's fee explicitly including Watlington.

2. MULTIPLE WATLINGTON COMPONENTS
Status upgraded:
[Verified existence of separate fee/court streams]
1427 distinguishes Trusbut fee from Robert Kervyle 1/4 fee.
16th-century antiquarian court-roll notices distinguish Gawsells Manor and
West Dereham Abbey manor in Watlington.
Therefore "Watlington" alone is never enough to assign a right to Colts.

3. ONE FREE FOLD
Remains directly recorded in the 1506 fine.
New problem: the 1506 parties are Wyatt/Pegge/Pynkeney; the title bridge back to
Trusbut/Colt must be demonstrated.

4. TWO FOLD LIBERTIES
HARE 2719 remains a Shouldham Priory-manor right package.
Do not merge with the 1506 "one free fold" until a later consolidation deed proves it.

5. WARREN
The 1634 Shouldham Warren lease is more firmly evidenced as an actual lease target.
Exact archive document remains missing.

6. SPORTING RIGHTS
1943 Hare Estate reservation is verified at official-plan level.
Appurtenance to Colts lordship remains unproved.

7. COURTS / CUSTOMS
New Watlington court-roll evidence materially increases the chance that court records
can distinguish the separate manor streams and show later recombination.

8. MINES / MINERALS
No direct Colts mineral reservation was found in PASS 3.
The 1943 lease remains an especially important document to test for such reservations.

9. MARKET / FAIR
No new direct ownership evidence in PASS 3.
Do not assign the Shouldham market/fair franchise to Colts yet.

10. ADVOWSON — ST PETER, WATLINGTON
Still directly documented in 1506.
No later PASS 3 instrument has yet carried it forward.

========================================================================
AG. PASS 3 — CUMULATIVE DOWNLOAD / URL POLICY
========================================================================

A separate cumulative CSV has now been created for every useful openable/downloadable
source URL found to date, including:
- primary image/document URLs
- scholarly digital editions
- archive/catalogue pages
- downloadable historical PDFs
- official heritage/estate plans
- secondary transcription/source-finders

CSV FILE:
WATLINGTON_COLTS_TRUSBUTTS_RIGHTS_SOURCE_URL_LEDGER_CUMULATIVE_2026-08-27_PASS_3.csv

RULE FOR FUTURE PASSES:
Every newly encountered document/source URL that can help reconstruct title, rights,
courts, customs, parcels, owners, reservations or extinction must be appended to the CSV.
Do not overwrite/remove historical rows merely because a later source supersedes them;
update status/notes instead.

========================================================================
AH. PASS 3 — REVISED PRIORITY RETRIEVAL / PROOF LIST
========================================================================

1. Bridge the 1427 Thomas Trusbut Watlington fee to the 1451 Trussbut succession and
the later Colt holding using primary deeds/IPMs/wills/court records.

2. Explain the 1506 Wyatt/Pegge/Pynkeney fine:
determine whether these parties were beneficial owners, feoffees, trustees or parties
to a separate Watlington manor. This is essential before relying on its free fold and
advowson as continuous Colts rights.

3. Recover the ORIGINAL 1587 George Colt -> Thomas Shouldham instrument identified by
Historic England.

4. Recover the ORIGINAL alleged 1596 conveyance of
"Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes".

5. Recover Thomas Trussbut's 1451 will/testamentary disposition and test the
Thomas -> William/John -> Jane succession.

6. Obtain/check TNA PROB 11/3 for John Trussbut, mercer d.1439; resolve the conflicting
folio citations and determine whether he belongs to this Norfolk Trussbut line.

7. Identify the 1867 Notes & Queries correspondent/collector and trace where the
"many thousand" Shouldham-area deeds and court rolls went.

8. Retrieve NRO originals:
- HARE 2493
- HARE 2683
- HARE 2684
- HARE 2495
- HARE 2719
- HARE 3080/7
- HARE 975
- HARE 979
- HARE 6832
- HARE 5186, 231x2
- HARE 5466, 222x5

9. Identify the exact archive reference for the 24 August 1611 deed describing
"Tittishall ... Trusbutes" and compare it to the 1622-1785 court book.

10. Recover the complete Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall
court book, 1622-1785 (ACC 2002/145 lead; final catalogue reference required).

11. Recover the 1634 Shouldham Warren lease and its exact archive reference.

12. Recover the actual 1943 Hare Estate -> Forestry Commission 999-year lease and
any supplemental deed/variation.

13. Recover the Watlington, Norfolk 1749 inclosure:
- full Act
- award
- map
- claims
- commissioners' papers
and extract all lord/common/mineral/fold/road/drain reservations.

14. Recover the Shouldham 1794 Act + award + map and validate the online 1798 schedule
against the archive original.

15. Trace the 1506 free fold and St Peter advowson forward through later assurances.

16. Determine who owned/exercised the Shouldham market/fair and warren rights before
and after Hare consolidation.

17. Obtain HMLR manorial/franchise index evidence and historic/current parcel registers,
filed deeds and former-copyhold enfranchisement documents for modern survival analysis.

========================================================================
AI. PASS 3 — NEW FINDINGS SUMMARY
========================================================================

1. NEW PRIMARY/EDITED RECORD:
1427 IPM directly records Thomas Trusbut and parceners holding a knight's fee
including Watlington.

2. NEW STRUCTURAL PROOF:
The same 1427 IPM separately records Robert Kervyle's 1/4 fee at Watlington,
proving multiple contemporary Watlington interests.

3. 1506 FINE UPGRADE:
Parties now recorded: Henry Wyatt, Richard Wyatt, Reynold Pegge v.
Robert Pynkeney and Elizabeth.
This creates a concrete chain question back to Trusbut/Colt.

4. NEW NRO TARGET SET:
HARE 3080/7, HARE 975, HARE 979 and an unidentified 1611 Trusbutes deed added.

5. NEW COURT-ROLL TRAILS:
Antiquarian source reports actual courts for Gawsells Manor in Watlington and
West Dereham Abbey manor in Watlington.

6. POTENTIALLY MAJOR LOST/TRANSFERRED COLLECTION:
1867 correspondent reported custody of "many thousand" Shouldham-area deeds and
court rolls. Provenance must be traced.

7. JOHN TRUSSBUT d.1439:
TNA PROB 11/3 is now a concrete probate target, but exact foliation is conflicted
between academic sources and his identity in the succession remains unproved.

8. 1634 WARREN:
Official Norfolk heritage article confirms the lease as a real historical target;
exact archive reference still missing.

9. 1943 SPORTING RIGHTS:
Official Forestry England PDF retained as direct downloadable evidence of the
Hare Estate's reservation; actual lease still missing.

10. NO FALSE CLOSURE:
1596 original, 1749 Norfolk award/map, 1634 lease, 1943 lease and key NRO originals
remain unresolved and must stay on the retrieval list.

========================================================================
AJ. PASS 4 — CONTINUITY / CORRECTIONS
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 4 continues from PASS 3 without deleting or replacing the earlier research.

The main targets for this run were:
- the medieval Laurence -> Thomas Trussbut tenure transition;
- Thomas Trussbut's identity and chronology;
- the Trussbut -> Colt bridge;
- surviving court rolls / extents / rentals;
- exact archive references and accessible/downloadable source URLs;
- the unresolved 1587/1596 Colt -> Shouldham assurance;
- material which can separate distinct Watlington manor/fee streams.

IMPORTANT DATE CORRECTION:
A source previously described in live research as "1389" is dated:
12 April, 13 Richard II.

Because 13 Richard II ran from June 1389 to June 1390, 12 April falls in 1390.
PASS 4 therefore records this as 12 April 1390.

IMPORTANT ACC 2002/145 CLARIFICATION:
The National Archives 2002 Norfolk accessions return DOES specifically list:
"Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall manor:
court book 1622-1785 (ACC 2002/145)."

Therefore:
- ACC 2002/145 is a valid ACCESSION-LEVEL identifier for the court book;
- it is ALSO the wider Bradfer-Lawrence accession;
- the final item-level Norfolk Record Office catalogue reference still has to be recovered.

========================================================================
AK. 1390 -> 1403 -> 1427 — WORMEGAY FEE STREAM
========================================================================

This is the strongest title/tenure development of PASS 4.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. 12 APRIL 1390
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOURCE:
Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem material reproduced in a Bardolf-family source file,
entry #814, Norfolk, inquisition taken at Shouldham.

DOWNLOADABLE SOURCE:
https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/families/BardolfFamilyto1400.pdf

TEXT RELEVANT TO THE MAIN FEE:
Watlyngton, Totenhill, Sechith, Carbiesthorp(?) and Langham:
ONE KNIGHT'S FEE,
held by:
- John Bertholom
- Laurence Trussebut
- others

SEPARATE WATLINGTON QUARTER-FEE:
Watlyngton:
1/4 knight's fee,
held by:
- William Stward
- his parceners

STATUS:
[Secondary digital reproduction of an edited IPM calendar entry.]
The original membrane reference still needs to be tied down directly.

SIGNIFICANCE:
Laurence Trussebut is already a named holder in the principal multi-place fee
containing Watlington by 1390.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2. 4 JULY 1403
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RECORD:
E-CIPM 18-793
Agnes Bardolf
Norfolk inquisition at Shouldham

TNA REFERENCES GIVEN BY THE DIGITAL EDITION:
C 137/37/39
E 149/81/3

DIRECT DIGITAL EDITION:
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/18-789/794.html

MAIN FEE:
Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, Shouldham Thorpe and Langham:
ONE FEE,
held by:
- Lawrence / Laurence Trussebute
- others
annual extended value: 60s

SEPARATE WATLINGTON QUARTER-FEE:
Watlington:
1/4 fee,
held by:
- Lawrence / Laurence Trussebute
- others
annual extended value: 10s

STATUS:
[Verified at scholarly digital-edition level.]

SIGNIFICANCE:
By 1403 Laurence is recorded not only in the principal multi-place fee but also in the
separate Watlington quarter-fee.

This is a material change from the 1390 calendar, where the separate quarter-fee was
held by William Stward and parceners.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
3. 1427
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RECORD:
E-CIPM 22-791
Thomas, Duke of Exeter
Norfolk inquisition

UNDERLYING TNA REFERENCE:
C 139/30/56, membranes 13 and 15

DIRECT DIGITAL EDITION:
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/22-791/index.html

MAIN FEE:
Watlington, Tottenhill, Garbodesthorp, Setchey and ?Longham:
ONE KNIGHT'S FEE,
held by:
- Thomas Trusbut
- his parceners

SEPARATE WATLINGTON QUARTER-FEE:
Watlington:
1/4 knight's fee,
held by:
- Robert Kervyle

STATUS:
[Verified at scholarly digital-edition level.]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
WORKING TENURIAL SEQUENCE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1390:
JOHN BERTHOLOM + LAURENCE TRUSSEBUT + OTHERS
|
| principal multi-place Wormegay fee including Watlington
v
1403:
LAURENCE TRUSSEBUTE + OTHERS
|
| [Inference: closely matching principal fee stream]
v
1427:
THOMAS TRUSBUT + PARCENERS

SEPARATE WATLINGTON QUARTER-FEE:

1390:
WILLIAM STWARD + PARCENERS
|
v
1403:
LAURENCE TRUSSEBUTE + OTHERS
|
v
1427:
ROBERT KERVYLE

CRITICAL INTERPRETATION:
[Inference]
The repeated honour-of-Wormegay context and closely matching geographical footprint make
the 1390, 1403 and 1427 principal fee entries look like successive snapshots of the same
or substantially the same feudal fee stream.

This materially strengthens the tenure sequence from Laurence Trussebut to Thomas Trusbut.

HOWEVER:
It does NOT by itself prove:
- Laurence was Thomas's father;
- Thomas inherited by blood;
- the fee was identical in every parcel through all three dates;
- the separate quarter-fee followed the same family title.

The family relationship remains a separate proof problem.

========================================================================
AL. LAURENCE TRUSSEBUT OF SHOULDHAM — ADMINISTRATIVE IDENTITY
========================================================================

A modern scholarly discussion of late-medieval Lynn materially expands Laurence's
documented career.

SOURCE:
Encountering The Book of Margery Kempe
online text access:
https://dokumen.pub/encountering-ltigtthe-book-of-margery-kempelt-igt-9781526146625.html

The source describes Laurence Trussebut OF SHOULDHAM as:
- active in administrative roles from the mid-1390s;
- Norfolk justice of the peace from 1401;
- Lynn justice, 1395-1415;
- bishop's steward at Lynn by 1414;
- an experienced estate manager;
- a man with extensive rural landholdings;
- paid an annual retainer by Lynn in the 1390s;
- dead by Easter 1418.

The same study says:
- Margery Lok's 1410 will identifies her as a Trussebut from Shouldham;
- Laurence was executor for William Lok and Margery Lok;
- Margery made bequests to Laurence's wife and children;
- Laurence MAY have been Margery Lok's brother;
- John de Brunham was a feoffee with several Trussebuts, including Laurence,
in additions to the Trussebut estates at Shouldham in 1386.

STATUS:
Mixed:
- administrative career / source statements: [scholarly secondary]
- "may have been Margery's brother": [Inference in the scholarly source]
- precise blood relationship therefore remains unproved.

WHY THIS MATTERS:
Laurence is no longer simply a name in a fee list.
He is independently placed in:
- Shouldham;
- estate management;
- Lynn administration;
- manorial/judicial work;
- a network of feoffees associated with Trussebut estate additions.

This makes him a strong documentary predecessor to the later Thomas tenure, but the
genealogical bridge must still be proved.

========================================================================
AM. 1397-1398 LIDGATE MANOR COURT ROLL — LAURENCE AS COURT ADMINISTRATOR
========================================================================

A manuscript dealer's 2016 catalogue records an ORIGINAL medieval manor-court roll for
Lidgate, Suffolk.

DOWNLOADABLE CATALOGUE:
https://www.quaritch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/1434-Manuscripts.pdf

CATALOGUE:
Bernard Quaritch, Catalogue 1434, item 82.

DOCUMENT:
Manor court roll for Lidgate
courts:
- October 1397
- January 1398

CATALOGUE DESCRIPTION:
The catalogue states that the court proceedings were written in the course of the sessions
by Laurence Trussebut, later bishop's steward of the Liberty of Lynn, and that his name
appears beside the heading for each session.

The roll reportedly contains:
- jurors
- amercements
- fines
- election of officers
- fealty
- fugitive villeins
- property transfers
- grants of houses/tenements
- trespass
- watercourse obligations
- reeve/hayward business

STATUS:
[Verified as a 2016 rare-manuscript catalogue description and photograph.]
The present private owner / present physical location has NOT been recovered.

IMPORTANT LIMIT:
This is a LIDGATE manor roll, not a Watlington or Shouldham manor roll.
Its customs must NOT be imported into Watlington Colts.

SIGNIFICANCE:
It independently establishes Laurence as an active manorial-court administrator by 1397
and gives a photographed handwriting/document comparator if original Trussebut documents
are later recovered.

The catalogue stated a 2016 asking price of £2,500 and noted the Manorial Documents Rules.

NEW TARGET:
Trace whether Quaritch can identify:
- sale date;
- institutional purchaser, if any;
- present archive if subsequently deposited;
- higher-resolution catalogue photographs.

========================================================================
AN. CHRIST'S COLLEGE CAMBRIDGE — SURVIVING RUNCTON HOLME TRUSSEBUT MUNIMENT
========================================================================

This is one of the best PHYSICALLY RETRIEVABLE medieval records found so far.

CHRIST'S COLLEGE MUNIMENTS INVENTORY:
https://www.christs.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/inline-files/Muniments_Inventory_List_Typed_March2021.pdf

INVENTORY ENTRY:
53 (1)

PLACE:
Runcton Holm / Runcton Holme, Norfolk

DOCUMENT:
Indenture of lease from:
- Prior and convent of Bromehill

to:
- Laurence ?Trussebut [catalogue has uncertain reading / alternative "Gressebut"]

PROPERTY:
"all the lands tenements rents & tithes" in Runcton Holm,
with listed parcels amounting in the catalogue transcription to approximately
4 acres 3 roods 20 perches.

TERM:
60 years

RENT:
20 shillings per annum

DATE:
1 Henry V
= regnal year 1413-1414.

STATUS:
[Verified as a current Christ's College archival inventory entry.]
The original deed has not yet been inspected by this project.

ARCHIVE ACCESS PAGE:
https://www.christs.cam.ac.uk/library-and-archives/archives

CONTACT:
archives@christs.cam.ac.uk

The College asks researchers to provide a clear list of material and normally request
access in advance.

SIGNIFICANCE:
This is an actual surviving medieval muniment placing Laurence Trussebut in a substantial
Runcton Holme lease involving:
- land
- tenements
- rents
- tithes

It is directly relevant to the wider Shouldham/Runcton Holme Trussebut estate network.

IMPORTANT LIMIT:
The lease does not by itself prove that the demised property was part of Watlington Colts
or that the rents/tithes later followed the Colts lordship.

HIGH PRIORITY ACTION:
Request:
- full archival shelfmark / box / pyxis identification for item 53(1);
- digital photographs of both faces;
- seals, endorsements and docket;
- full Latin transcription if available;
- names of witnesses;
- exact date;
- any related Bromehill / Runcton Holme deeds in the same muniment group.

========================================================================
AO. THOMAS TRUSSEBUT OF LYNN — STRONG IDENTITY CANDIDATE, NOT YET PROVED
========================================================================

SOURCE:
ORB Medieval English Urban History — Lynn biographies:
https://the-orb.arlima.net/encyclop/culture/towns/biography/biolynn.html

The biography records a Thomas Trussebut who:
- entered the Lynn franchise in 1385;
- had been apprenticed to merchant John Lok;
- was heavily involved in cloth exports in 1391-1395;
- imported herring, garlic, canvas and flax;
- owned his own ship by 1400;
- invested accumulated wealth in rural real estate around Lynn;
- later served as coroner;
- was removed from the coronership in 1441 because of old age and infirmity.

PRIMARY/EDITED RECORD CONTEXT:
A Norfolk IPM taken at Bishop's Lynn on 24 June 1438 lists among the jurors:
- Thomas Shuldham
- Thomas Trussebut
- Thomas Keruyle
and others.

DIRECT DIGITAL EDITION:
https://ipm-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/view/inquisition/25-088/92.html

[Inference]
The merchant/coroner Thomas Trussebut of Lynn is chronologically, geographically and
socially compatible with:
- Thomas Trusbut holding the Watlington-containing fee in 1427;
- the later Thomas Trussbut said to have died in 1451.

However, the identity is NOT yet proved.

WHY THE 1438 JURY MATTERS:
Thomas Shuldham and Thomas Trussebut occurring together on the same Bishop's Lynn jury
places the surnames side by side in the same Norfolk administrative milieu immediately
before the alleged 1451 Trussbut succession.

This is useful network evidence, not proof of kinship or title transfer.

NEXT IDENTITY PROOF:
Find records where Thomas is simultaneously styled by:
- Lynn citizenship/mercantile office;
AND
- Shouldham / Watlington / Runcton Holme property.

========================================================================
AP. TRUSSBUT -> COLT BRIDGE — VISITATION / LATER GENEALOGICAL LEADS
========================================================================

A useful but still SECONDARY heraldic/genealogical lead has been identified.

OLD VISITATION EDITION:
The Visitation of Suffolke, William Harvey, 1561,
Joseph Jackson Howard edition, 1866.

INTERNET ARCHIVE ITEM:
https://archive.org/details/visitationofsuff01harv

DIRECT PDF:
https://archive.org/download/visitationofsuff01harv/visitationofsuff01harv.pdf

A modern FamilySearch compilation quotes the older visitation edition as saying, in
substance, that Thomas Cowlte married Jane, daughter and heir of Thursbotte of Norfolk,
and had John Cowlte.

SOURCE-FINDER ONLY:
https://www.familysearch.org/en/memories/memory/25829757

Separate modern secondary genealogy:
https://www.thepeerage.com/p24588.htm

This gives:
- Thomas Colt d. 22 August 1471
- wife Johanna Trusbut
- Johanna daughter of John Trusbut
- Johanna d.1473
- later marriage to Sir William Parr

A further secondary compilation:
https://www.stirnet.com/genie/data/british/cc4aq/colt02.php

styles her:
Johanna Trusbut, daughter of John Trusbut of Runcton Holme.

EVIDENTIAL STATUS:
[Unverified / secondary genealogy until the underlying visitation and original medieval
instruments are checked.]

IMPORTANT:
This does NOT justify importing modern internet parents such as invented or unsupported
John/Laurence relationships.

WHAT IT DOES DO:
It gives a tightly defined primary-source target:
- locate the Colt pedigree in the 1561 Suffolk Visitation editions;
- compare the original heralds' manuscript wording;
- locate any visitation proofs / deeds / wills from which the pedigree was derived;
- test "Jane" versus "Johanna";
- test whether "daughter and heir" is original wording;
- test whether "of Runcton Holme" appears in an early source or only later compilation.

========================================================================
AQ. NRO ACC 2022/153 — LATE 15TH / EARLY 16TH-CENTURY EXTENT
========================================================================

This is potentially one of the most important new archive targets for the 1450-1510 gap.

THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES — NORFOLK RECORD OFFICE 2023 ACCESSIONS:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/accessions/2023/23returns/23ac153.htm

ACCESSION:
ACC 2022/153

PROVENANCE:
Janet Hammond (d.2018), local historian of Sedgeford Collection.

CATALOGUE DESCRIPTION:
"part of an extent of ?Shouldham from Hare MSS or possibly Fincham or Runcton Holme
[late 15th-early 16th century]"

STATUS:
[Verified as an official accession description.]
The manor/place attribution is itself explicitly uncertain in the catalogue.

SIGNIFICANCE:
The date range falls directly across the project's hardest transition:
late Trussbut / Colt holding
->
1506 Watlyngton fine
->
later Colt/Shouldham/Gawdy estate formation.

POSSIBLE CONTENT IF THE ITEM IS RELEVANT:
- tenants
- rents
- parcels
- customary services
- demesne
- courts
- fold/foldcourse
- commons
- waste
- boundaries
- place-names
- manor identification

DO NOT ASSUME:
It is not yet established that this extent belongs to Colts/Trusbutts.

HIGH PRIORITY ACTION:
NRO should be asked for:
- final catalogue reference replacing the accession-level reference;
- digital images;
- catalogue notes on handwriting/date/provenance;
- why "?Shouldham" versus Fincham/Runcton Holme was proposed;
- whether the fragment has a heading, lord's name, tenant names or recognizable parcels.

========================================================================
AR. EXACT LATE-MEDIEVAL COURT-ROLL / RENTAL REFERENCES EXPOSED IN 2026 STUDY
========================================================================

A 2026 peer-reviewed article exposes exact Norfolk Record Office references useful to the
wider Shouldham/Hare/manorial context.

ARTICLE:
Spike Gibbs,
"Whose was the Fifteenth-century Manor Court? Seigneurial Jurisdictions, Peasant
Economic Activity and 'Middle-class Lordship' in Late Medieval East Anglia (England)"

OPEN ARTICLE:
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbwg-2026-0005/html

KCL REPOSITORY PAGE:
https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/whose-was-the-fifteenth-century-manor-court-seigneurial-jurisdict/

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT FILE URL:
https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/357573096/Gibbs_-_Fifteenth_century_manor_court.docx

DOWNLOAD MIRROR:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403714450_Whose_was_the_Fifteenth-century_Manor_Court_Seigneurial_Jurisdictions_Peasant_Economic_Activity_and_Middle-class_Lordship_in_Late_Medieval_East_Anglia_England/download

EXACT NRO REFERENCES FROM APPENDIX 2:

DERSINGHAM SHOULDHAM:
- Court Rolls 1495-1509
NRO WAL 1058, 285x2

- Rental 1499/1500
NRO PD 603/197

WIMBOTSHAM:
- Court Rolls 1399-1419
NRO HARE 4241, 212x4

- Extent 1412
NRO HARE 4303, 213X2

IMPORTANT STRUCTURAL LIMIT:
"Dersingham Shouldham" is a Shouldham Priory manor in Dersingham and must NOT be treated
as Watlington Colts merely because "Shouldham" appears in the manor name.

USE:
These records are:
- comparative manorial evidence;
- a source for the Priory stream;
- possible evidence of the wider institutional/customary environment;
- possible cross-reference sources for people who also held Colts lands.

The Wimbotsham HARE material is geographically useful but likewise must not be imported
into Colts without a title/customary bridge.

========================================================================
AS. TITTLESHALL ALIAS TRUSBUTTS COURT BOOK — ACCESSION IDENTIFIER CONFIRMED
========================================================================

OFFICIAL NORFOLK ACCESSIONS RETURN:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/accessions/2002/02returns/02ac153.htm

OFFICIAL MANORIAL DIGEST:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/accessions/2002/02digests/manorial.htm

EXACT ENTRY:
"Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall manor:
court book 1622-1785 (ACC 2002/145)"

STATUS:
[Verified official archive-accession evidence.]

CORRECT WAY TO CITE AT PRESENT:
Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall manor,
court book 1622-1785,
Norfolk Record Office,
ACC 2002/145 [accession-level reference; final item-level catalogue reference pending].

SIGNIFICANCE:
This remains a first-tier source for actual:
- admissions
- surrenders
- rents
- fines
- heriots
- copyhold incidents
- customs
- common rights
- highways
- drains
- encroachments
- boundaries
- potentially sporting/warren/fold evidence

CRITICAL LIMIT:
The court book is for Tittleshall alias Trusbutts in Runcton Holme and Tottenhall.
It must not automatically be treated as Watlington Colts/Trusbutts.

The exact relationship between the similarly styled Trusbutts properties/manors remains
a title-reconstruction question.

========================================================================
AT. HARE 5466 — EXACT DISCOVERY RECORD NOW RECOVERED
========================================================================

THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES DISCOVERY ITEM:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/81c466ba-2759-40d3-b601-12e9249d85f6

REFERENCE:
Hare 5466, 222 x 5

DATE:
19th century; includes tenancy agreement dated 3 October 1871 and post-1874 schedules.

HELD BY:
Norfolk Record Office

DESCRIPTION EXPRESSLY LISTS:
- Colts Farm in Shouldham
- Shouldham Abbey Farm
- Heath Farm in Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe
- Thorpe Manor Farm in Shouldham Thorpe
- Chisewicks Farm / Park Lands
- other Stow Bardolph estate farms

STATUS:
[Verified official archive catalogue record.]

SIGNIFICANCE:
Colts Farm remained a separately named physical estate unit inside the Hare estate in the
late nineteenth century.

[Inference]
This continues to support the possibility that:
- the physical Colts farm/estate,
- the incorporeal lordship,
- and particular manorial rights
may have been capable of separate later ownership histories.

It does not itself prove a severance occurred.

========================================================================
AU. SIR WILLIAM BUTTS / BACON COLLECTION — NEW ARCHIVE SIDE-ROUTE
========================================================================

The University of Chicago's Sir Nicholas Bacon Collection contains a significant body of
Butts/Bacon material which may help reconstruct the later Butts estate network.

SEARCHABLE FINDING AID:
https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/scrc/findingaids/view.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.BACONSN

RELEVANT EXAMPLES EXPOSED BY THE CATALOGUE INCLUDE:

MS 1454
1561
"Value of Sir William Butts lands"

MS 4383
28 September 1561
Sir Nicholas Bacon -> Sir William Buttes
articles concerning the marriage of Nicholas Bacon, son/heir apparent of Sir Nicholas,
and Anne Buttes, niece/heir apparent of Sir William.

MS 4384
3 October 1561
marriage-related indenture involving Sir William Butts / Dame Jane and the Bacon family.

MS 898
1562
Sir William Butts, Norfolk
Quietus est for Sheriff from the Norfolk and Suffolk Great Roll.

The collection also contains multiple Butts/Bures/Bacon receipts, settlements and estate
documents.

STATUS:
[Verified archive catalogue evidence.]

IMPORTANT LIMIT:
[Unverified]
The exact relationship of each Chicago Butts item to the particular Butts holder in the
Watlington-Colts title chain has not yet been demonstrated.

USE:
Potentially useful for:
- identifying Sir William's estates;
- tracing heirs;
- tracing Bacon marital transfer;
- locating schedules of lands;
- checking whether Shouldham/Watlington or related properties appear in the wider papers.

This is therefore a targeted side-route, not yet direct proof of a Colts right.

========================================================================
AV. 1587 / 1596 COLT -> SHOULDHAM ASSURANCE — STILL NOT RECOVERED
========================================================================

PASS 4 did NOT recover the original deed/fine/recovery behind either date.

The conflict remains:

HISTORIC ENGLAND:
George Colt -> Thomas Shouldham in 1587.

AUCTION/TITLE NARRATIVE:
1596 conveyance of:
"the manor of Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes"
with the previously recorded multi-parish appurtenance package.

STATUS:
[Unresolved.]

NO attempt has been made in PASS 4 to manufacture a reconciliation.

POSSIBILITIES remain:
- 1587 sale + 1596 confirmation/assurance;
- 1587 contract + 1596 legal conveyance;
- fine/recovery after an earlier bargain;
- two different estate components;
- dating error in a secondary source.

ONLY the originals can resolve this.

========================================================================
AW. PASS 4 — UPDATED RIGHTS / TITLE IMPLICATIONS
========================================================================

1. PRINCIPAL TRUSSBUT WATLINGTON FEE
Status strengthened substantially.

1390:
Laurence Trussebut is among holders of the multi-place knight's fee including Watlington.

1403:
Laurence Trussebute and others hold a closely matching multi-place fee.

1427:
Thomas Trusbut and parceners hold the later Watlington-containing fee.

[Inference]
This is now a strong tenurial continuity hypothesis, but the Laurence -> Thomas blood
relationship is still unproved.

2. SEPARATE WATLINGTON QUARTER-FEE
1390: William Stward + parceners.
1403: Laurence Trussebute + others.
1427: Robert Kervyle.

This provides further proof that "Watlington" cannot be treated as a single medieval
manor/fee without identifying the exact stream.

3. COURT / ADMINISTRATIVE CAPACITY
Laurence is independently tied to manorial administration by the 1397 Lidgate court roll.
This does NOT transfer Lidgate customs to Shouldham, but strengthens identification of
Laurence as an experienced steward.

4. RUNCTON HOLME
Christ's College holds a surviving medieval lease to Laurence involving lands,
tenements, rents and tithes.
This is a first-tier archival target.

5. TRUSSBUT -> COLT
The later heraldic/genealogical tradition continues to identify the Colt wife as
Jane/Johanna, daughter/heir of a Norfolk Trusbut/Thursbotte.
Primary medieval proof remains missing.

6. COURT BOOK 1622-1785
ACC 2002/145 now securely retained as an accession-level reference.
Final NRO item reference and images remain missing.

7. LATE 15TH / EARLY 16TH EXTENT
ACC 2022/153 is now a high-priority record because its date window overlaps the
Trusbut/Colt -> 1506 transition.

8. COLTS FARM
HARE 5466 exact catalogue description confirms Colts Farm remained named separately
within the Hare estate in the late 19th century.

9. ONE FREE FOLD — 1506
NO new PASS 4 document yet bridges it backwards to the Trusbut fee or forwards to later
Colt/Hare assurances.
It remains a major direct historic right with a continuity problem.

10. ST PETER ADVOWSON — 1506
Same: direct historic evidence remains strong; later continuity still unproved.

11. MARKET / FAIR
No new ownership proof in PASS 4.

12. WARREN
No original 1634 lease recovered in PASS 4.

13. SPORTING RIGHTS
No actual 1943 lease recovered in PASS 4.

14. MINES / MINERALS
No direct Colts reservation found in PASS 4.

15. WATLINGTON 1749 INCLOSURE
No full Norfolk Act/award/map recovered in PASS 4.

========================================================================
AX. PASS 4 — REVISED HIGH-PRIORITY ACTION LIST
========================================================================

1. CHRIST'S COLLEGE ITEM 53(1):
obtain images/transcription of the Laurence Trussebut Runcton Holme lease.

2. NRO ACC 2022/153:
obtain the late-15th/early-16th-century extent and settle whether it is:
- Shouldham
- Fincham
- Runcton Holme
- another Hare-manor fragment.

3. LAURENCE -> THOMAS:
find the actual transfer/death/heir instrument between c.1418 and 1427.

4. THOMAS IDENTITY:
prove whether the Lynn merchant/coroner is the 1427 fee-holder and the Thomas d.1451.

5. THOMAS TRUSSBUT 1451:
obtain will/IPM/probate/title disposition.

6. JOHN TRUSSBUT d.1439:
obtain TNA PROB 11/3;
resolve conflicting foliation;
test wife, children, brothers, Norfolk holdings, feoffees and heirs.

7. JANE / JOHANNA:
inspect the original/early Suffolk and Essex visitation pedigree wording and then chase
the medieval proof behind "daughter and heir of Thursbotte/Trusbut".

8. 1587:
recover George Colt -> Thomas Shouldham original assurance.

9. 1596:
recover the original "Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes" assurance.

10. 1506:
explain Pynkeney -> Wyatt/Pegge and bridge it to Trusbut/Colt title.

11. TITTLESHALL ALIAS TRUSBUTTS COURT BOOK:
recover final NRO item reference and inspect 1622-1785 book.

12. HARE 2493 / 2683 / 2684 / 2495 / 2719:
obtain originals/digital images.

13. NEW NRO COMPARATIVE TARGETS:
- WAL 1058, 285x2
- PD 603/197
- HARE 4241, 212x4
- HARE 4303, 213X2

14. QUARITCH LIDGATE ROLL:
trace present location / purchaser if possible.

15. 1867 PRIVATE COLLECTION:
continue provenance search for the reported "many thousand" Shouldham-area deeds and
court rolls.

16. 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN:
recover exact lease/reference.

17. 1943 HARE -> FORESTRY COMMISSION:
recover actual 999-year lease and reservations.

18. 1749 WATLINGTON NORFOLK INCLOSURE:
recover Act + award + map + claims + commissioners' papers.

19. HARE 5466:
inspect full schedules to see exactly how Colts Farm was treated relative to the other
separately named manors/farms.

20. CHICAGO BACON COLLECTION:
search estate schedules/value documents for Shouldham/Watlington/Colts references.

========================================================================
AY. PASS 4 — NEW ACCESS / DOWNLOAD URLS
========================================================================

1390 IPM calendar / Bardolf compilation:
https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/families/BardolfFamilyto1400.pdf

1403 edited IPM:
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/18-789/794.html

1419 edited IPM with Laurence named in 1397 feoffment and omitted from surviving feoffees:
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/21-250/index.html

1438 Bishop's Lynn jury:
https://ipm-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/view/inquisition/25-088/92.html

Thomas Trussebut Lynn biography:
https://the-orb.arlima.net/encyclop/culture/towns/biography/biolynn.html

Laurence / Shouldham scholarly discussion:
https://dokumen.pub/encountering-ltigtthe-book-of-margery-kempelt-igt-9781526146625.html

1397-98 Lidgate manor roll catalogue:
https://www.quaritch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/1434-Manuscripts.pdf

Christ's College muniments inventory:
https://www.christs.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/inline-files/Muniments_Inventory_List_Typed_March2021.pdf

Christ's College archive access:
https://www.christs.cam.ac.uk/library-and-archives/archives

NRO 2023 accession ACC 2022/153:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/accessions/2023/23returns/23ac153.htm

NRO 2002 return / ACC 2002/145:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/accessions/2002/02returns/02ac153.htm

HARE 5466 exact Discovery record:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/81c466ba-2759-40d3-b601-12e9249d85f6

Gibbs 2026 manorial-court article:
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbwg-2026-0005/html

KCL repository:
https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/whose-was-the-fifteenth-century-manor-court-seigneurial-jurisdict/

KCL accepted manuscript:
https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/files/357573096/Gibbs_-_Fifteenth_century_manor_court.docx

ResearchGate PDF/download route:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403714450_Whose_was_the_Fifteenth-century_Manor_Court_Seigneurial_Jurisdictions_Peasant_Economic_Activity_and_Middle-class_Lordship_in_Late_Medieval_East_Anglia_England/download

University of Chicago Bacon Collection:
https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/scrc/findingaids/view.php?eadid=ICU.SPCL.BACONSN

1561 Suffolk Visitation Internet Archive:
https://archive.org/details/visitationofsuff01harv

Direct Suffolk Visitation PDF:
https://archive.org/download/visitationofsuff01harv/visitationofsuff01harv.pdf

Secondary Colt/Trusbut source:
https://www.thepeerage.com/p24588.htm

Secondary Colt pedigree source:
https://www.stirnet.com/genie/data/british/cc4aq/colt02.php

========================================================================
AZ. PASS 4 — NEW FINDINGS SUMMARY
========================================================================

1. The medieval fee trail is materially stronger:
1390 Laurence Trussebut appears among holders of the main Watlington-containing fee;
1403 Laurence + others hold the closely matching fee;
1427 Thomas Trusbut + parceners hold the later fee.

2. A distinct Watlington quarter-fee can now be followed separately:
William Stward/parceners -> Laurence/others -> Robert Kervyle.
This reinforces the multi-manor/multi-fee caution.

3. Laurence Trussebut of Shouldham is independently documented as an administrator,
JP, Lynn justice, bishop's steward and estate manager, dead by Easter 1418 according
to modern scholarship.

4. A photographed ORIGINAL Lidgate manor court roll from 1397-98 was catalogued as being
written by Laurence Trussebut.
It is not a Colts record, but proves his manorial administrative activity.

5. Christ's College Cambridge holds a surviving medieval Runcton Holme lease to Laurence
Trussebut covering lands, tenements, rents and tithes for 60 years.
This is a direct archive-order target.

6. Thomas Trussebut of Lynn has a long merchant chronology from 1385 to removal as coroner
for old age in 1441.
[Inference] He is a strong candidate for the 1427 holder / Thomas d.1451, but identity
is not yet proved.

7. A 1438 Bishop's Lynn IPM jury places Thomas Shuldham and Thomas Trussebut together.

8. ACC 2022/153 contains part of a late-15th/early-16th-century extent tentatively
identified as ?Shouldham / Fincham / Runcton Holme.
Its date is ideal for the Trusbut/Colt -> 1506 gap.

9. Exact NRO references have been recovered for further late-medieval court-roll work:
WAL 1058, PD 603/197, HARE 4241 and HARE 4303.

10. ACC 2002/145 is confirmed as the accession-level reference attached to the
Tittleshall alias Trusbutts court book 1622-1785, although the final item-level
NRO reference is still missing.

11. HARE 5466 now has an exact Discovery URL and expressly lists Colts Farm separately
among the later Hare estate farms.

12. The University of Chicago Bacon Collection provides a new Butts/Bacon estate-paper
route, including a 1561 "Value of Sir William Butts lands" and related records.

13. The original 1587/1596 assurance, 1451 Thomas Trussbut testament, 1634 warren lease,
1943 Hare-Forestry lease and 1749 Watlington inclosure award/map remain unresolved.

========================================================================
BA. PASS 5 — CORE TASK REFOCUS: RIGHTS OF THE MANORIAL TITLE
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 5 changes the working structure of the project.

The core question is no longer merely:
"What documents survive?"

It is:

FOR EACH HISTORIC RIGHT OR INCIDENT:
1. Was it actually attached to this manor / fee / title stream?
2. What is the earliest direct evidence?
3. Was it exercised in court, conveyed, reserved or otherwise confirmed?
4. Did enclosure, enfranchisement, sale or statute alter it?
5. Was it severed from the lordship?
6. Was it extinguished, commuted or compensated?
7. If it belongs to a legally preservable category, can a continuous title to that
PARTICULAR RIGHT be shown to the present claimant?
8. What document is still required to prove current exercise or ownership?

This distinction is essential because HM Land Registry treats three different things as
capable of existing separately:

- the LORDSHIP TITLE;
- MANORIAL LAND;
- MANORIAL RIGHTS.

A lordship can therefore continue while having no land and no rights attached.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
HM Land Registry Practice Guide 22:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/manors/practice-guide-22-manors

PASS 5 therefore introduces a separate current-rights / survival ledger.

========================================================================
BB. LEGAL TEST FOR A RIGHT TO EXIST TODAY
========================================================================

HM Land Registry Practice Guide 66 gives a practical evidence test for a claimed
surviving manorial right.

For an agreed notice, the claimant will normally need to prove:

1. the affected land was previously COPYHOLD of the manor in question;
2. it was the CUSTOM of that manor that the lord possessed the claimed right
(court rolls are given as an example of evidence);
3. the right SURVIVED ENFRANCHISEMENT;
4. the claimant owns the PARTICULAR manorial right now, normally through title to the
lordship plus evidence that the right was NOT SEVERED.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013/practice-guide-66-overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013

CRITICAL CONSEQUENCE FOR THIS PROJECT:

A document saying "Lord of Watlington Colts" is NOT enough to establish:
- minerals;
- sporting rights;
- warren;
- fishery;
- market;
- drainage incidents;
or any other historical right.

Likewise, a medieval document proving a right once existed is NOT enough to prove that
it still belongs to the present lordship.

The chain has to be reconstructed RIGHT BY RIGHT.

========================================================================
BC. RIGHTS WHICH COULD LEGALLY HAVE SURVIVED COPYHOLD ABOLITION
========================================================================

HM Land Registry treats the Schedule 12 list in the Law of Property Act 1922 as a
comprehensive statement of the relevant preserved manorial rights, while noting that
different legal views exist.

The preserved categories include:

MINERAL / SOIL RIGHTS
- mines;
- minerals;
- limestone;
- lime;
- clay;
- stone;
- gravel;
- pits;
- quarries.

ANCILLARY MINERAL RIGHTS
- rights of entry;
- rights of way;
- search;
- easements / privileges;
- powers for winning, working and carrying away minerals and materials.

FRANCHISE / SPORT / NATURAL RESOURCE RIGHTS
- fairs;
- markets;
- chase;
- warren;
- piscary;
- hunting;
- shooting;
- fishing;
- fowling;
- otherwise taking game, fish or fowl.

CERTAIN MANORIAL LIABILITIES
- construction / maintenance / cleansing / repair of:
dykes,
ditches,
canals,
sea or river walls,
piles,
bridges,
levels,
ways,
and protective/general-benefit works.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
HM Land Registry PG66:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013/practice-guide-66-overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013

IMPORTANT:
This list tells us what categories COULD survive.
It does NOT prove any particular one existed at Watlington Colts or survives today.

========================================================================
BD. RIGHTS / INCIDENTS WHICH DID NOT SIMPLY CONTINUE AS FEUDAL POWERS
========================================================================

COPYHOLD:
The Law of Property Act 1922 abolished copyhold tenure, taking effect on
1 January 1926.

MANORIAL COURTS:
The National Archives states that abolition of copyhold brought to an end the last
meaningful function of manorial courts.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archives-sector/legislation/historical-and-legislative-background/

MANORIAL INCIDENTS:
Section 140 of the Law of Property Act 1922 expressly deals with extinguishment of
unresolved manorial incidents after ten years from commencement where no compensation
agreement or notice to ascertain compensation had intervened.

The provision expressly refers to:
- heriot;
- quit rent;
- chief rent;
- free rent;
- other manorial incident.

OFFICIAL ACT PDF:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1922/16/pdfs/ukpga_19220016_en.pdf

Therefore, medieval or early-modern evidence of:
- heriots;
- customary fines;
- reliefs;
- fealty;
- suit of court;
- copyhold admission/surrender;
- licence to alienate copyhold;
- customary inheritance incidents;
etc.,
is historically important but does NOT make those exercisable feudal incidents of the
present lordship.

The historic court records remain essential because they may prove customs from which
the genuinely preserved rights derive.

========================================================================
BE. NEW PRIMARY RIGHTS-BEARING WATLINGTON COURT RECORD — 1435-1436
========================================================================

A Public Records Commission inventory records:

"WATLINGTON, manor.
Roll of court baron and customary court,
anno 14 Hen. VI."

DATE:
14 Henry VI = 1435-1436.

DOWNLOADABLE SOURCE:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/General_Report_to_the_King_in_Council_from_the_Honourable_Board_of_Commissioners_on_the_Public_Records_IA_dli.granth.75463.pdf

STATUS:
[Verified as an old official inventory describing the historic record.]
The present modern shelfmark / physical location of this exact roll remains unresolved.

WHY THIS IS NOW A TOP-TIER RIGHTS DOCUMENT:

A COURT BARON AND CUSTOMARY COURT roll can potentially show which rights/customs were
actually exercised, including:
- customary tenures;
- admissions/surrenders;
- entry fines;
- heriots;
- rents;
- suit of court;
- encroachments;
- common/waste regulation;
- fold/foldage custom;
- boundaries;
- amercements;
- licences;
- drainage/highway obligations;
- local custom affecting minerals, sporting or other reserved rights.

DO NOT PRESUME those incidents appear in this roll until it is inspected.

The fact that the roll is described as a court baron AND customary court is nevertheless
direct evidence that a functioning Watlington manorial/customary jurisdiction existed in
1435-1436.

ADDITIONAL CONTENT IN THE SAME INVENTORY:
The inventory also describes:
- Wormegay honour minister's accounts and valor, 20 Henry VIII;
- a long eleven-membrane roll, around Edward I, giving the knight's fees, manors and
advowsons of Lord Bardolf within Wormegay, with feoffees/subtenants, rents, services,
customs and quantities of land.

This Wormegay material is potentially important for reconstructing what services/customs
were attached to the Watlington fee before the Trussbut period.

========================================================================
BF. SECOND ACTUAL WATLINGTON COURT RECORD — 1512
========================================================================

A second surviving court record is now pinned to a modern repository.

REPOSITORY:
Oxfordshire History Centre

REFERENCE:
GB 160 SL26/6

TITLE:
"DRAFT COURT ROLL OF MANOR OF WATLINGTON IN NORFOLK"

DATE:
1512

CATALOGUE:
https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb160-sl26/sl26/6

STATUS:
[Verified at archive-catalogue level.]
The roll itself has NOT yet been inspected.

SIGNIFICANCE:
This is only six years after the 1506 final concord which conveyed:

- manor of Watlyngton;
- 16s rent;
- ONE FREE FOLD;
- ADVOWSON OF ST PETER;
plus the land bundle.

The 1512 roll may therefore be capable of testing whether the 1506 rights were actually
being exercised shortly afterwards.

HIGHEST-VALUE QUESTIONS FOR SL26/6:
- Who is named lord?
- Who is steward?
- Is the manor identifiable with the 1506 Wyatt/Pynkeney transaction?
- Is any "fold", "free fold", foldage or foldcourse recorded?
- What fixed/assize/quit/free rents occur?
- Are heriots/fines recorded?
- Is waste/common land regulated?
- Are encroachments recorded?
- Are roads/drains/dykes regulated?
- Is any market, fair, fishery, warren or sporting custom recorded?
- Are copyhold/customary tenants identified?
- Does the roll identify parcels that can be followed into enclosure or later titles?

This is now one of the most important physically inspectable records in the whole
rights-survival project.

========================================================================
BG. 1506 RIGHTS BUNDLE — CURRENT LEGAL ANALYSIS
========================================================================

DIRECT RECORD:
CP 25/1/170/197 no.106
8 July 1506

ABSTRACT:
https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_170_197.shtml

ORIGINAL MEMBRANE:
https://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT4/CP251/CP251no170/IMG_0159.htm

EXPRESS BUNDLE:
- manor of Watlyngton;
- 1 messuage;
- 200 acres land;
- 20 acres meadow;
- 40 acres pasture;
- 10 acres wood;
- 16 shillings rent;
- ONE FREE FOLD;
- ADVOWSON OF ST PETER OF WATLINGTON.

PARTIES:
Henry Wyatt, esquire;
Richard Wyatt, clerk;
Reynold Pegge
v.
Robert Pynkeney and Elizabeth his wife.

CURRENT INTERPRETATION:

MANOR / LORDSHIP:
The lordship itself is a category capable of continuing independently.

LAND:
The physical land does not automatically follow the lordship today.
It has to be traced as ordinary land title.

16s RENT:
Historically direct.
Its exact legal character in 1506 is not yet established.
If it was a quit/free/manorial rent or other extinguishable manorial incident, the
1922-1936 reforms are critical.
No modern subsisting 16s rent has yet been proved.

ONE FREE FOLD:
Historically direct.
Not itself one of the express Schedule 12 preserved categories.
Its relationship with customary sheep-folding/foldage and the 1749 inclosure must be
reconstructed.
Current exercisability is NOT established.

ADVOWSON:
Historically direct.
It was capable of being separately transferred from the lordship.
In addition, the Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 later imposed a statutory severance
of any advowson still appendant to land or a manor.
See section BH below.

========================================================================
BH. ADVOWSON OF ST PETER — HISTORIC RIGHT, BUT NOT A PRESENT APPENDANT
MANORIAL RIGHT
========================================================================

1506:
The advowson of St Peter of Watlington is expressly conveyed with the manor.

1791-1824:
John Davis Plestow is recorded as rector AND patron of Watlington, Norfolk.

SOURCE:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/PageAlumni_Oxoniensis_1715-1886_volume_3.djvu/355

1845:
Charles Berners Plestow is recorded as lord of Gawsels Manor in Watlington and the
rectory is in his gift.

SOURCE:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1845.shtml

IMPORTANT:
This 1845 entry names GAWSELS, not Colts.
It therefore cannot itself prove the patronage was attached to Colts.

1883:
The rectory is recorded in the patronage of Gilbert Barker, Esq.

SOURCE:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1883.shtml

1923:
A later clerical biographical source records the Watlington living with patron:
A. E. H. Birch.

SOURCE:
https://anglicanhistory.org/england/congresses/hickton_blain2022.pdf

These changes already show that patronage had its own later devolution.

MOST IMPORTANT MODERN STATUTORY CHANGE:

PATRONAGE (BENEFICES) MEASURE 1986
Official PDF:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukcm/1986/3/pdfs/ukcm_19860003_en.pdf

SECTION 32:
Every advowson which immediately before commencement was appendant to any land or any
manor was, by operation of the Measure, severed from that land or manor and became an
advowson in gross.

Where the manor was privately owned, the advowson became the personal property of the
person who at that date was lord of the manor.

SECTION 3:
No right of patronage of a benefice is capable of SALE; a transfer for valuable
consideration is void.

CURRENT RIGHTS CONCLUSION:

[Verified legal consequence, subject to proving which advowson existed at commencement]

Even if the historic Watlington advowson had remained appendant to the manor all the way
to commencement of section 32, it ceased thereafter to be an appendant right of the
manor.

Therefore:
THE ADVOWSON MUST NOT BE LISTED TODAY AS A RIGHT WHICH AUTOMATICALLY PASSES WITH
THE MANORIAL TITLE.

Any existing modern right of patronage has a separate ecclesiastical devolution and
registration history.

NEXT:
Obtain the Diocese of Norwich patronage register entry for the present benefice and its
historic patronage file.

========================================================================
BI. ONE FREE FOLD — 1506: RIGHTS SURVIVAL ANALYSIS
========================================================================

STATUS OF EXISTENCE:
[Verified historically]
"one free fold" is expressly in the 1506 final concord.

HISTORICAL FUNCTION:
[General historical context]
Fold / foldage systems in East Anglia could involve the lord's right or custom to have
tenant sheep folded on designated land, often benefiting the demesne through manure,
with related foldcourse or foldage incidents.

THIS GENERAL DEFINITION DOES NOT PROVE THE EXACT WATLINGTON CUSTOM.

CRITICAL LOCAL DOCUMENTS:
- 1435-36 court baron/customary court roll;
- 1512 draft Watlington court roll;
- 1749 Watlington inclosure Act/award/map.

1749 IMPACT:
The Watlington-specific Act was:

Watlington Inclosure Act 1748
22 Geo. II private c.37
Royal Assent 26 May 1749

"An Act for enclosing and dividing certain Commons and Wastes, within the Manor and
Parish of Watlington, in the County of Norfolk."

[Inference]
Because fold systems often depended upon common grazing, sheep-course and demesne/common
arrangements, enclosure is a likely transformation point for the 1506 free fold.

BUT:
Until the AWARD is inspected, this project cannot say whether the Watlington free fold was:
- allotted in land;
- commuted;
- compensated;
- expressly reserved;
- abandoned;
- already obsolete;
- or transformed in another way.

1922-1926 IMPACT:
"free fold" is not separately named in the Schedule 12 list of preserved manorial rights.

[Inference]
If the Watlington free fold survived 1749 merely as a customary manorial service or
incident of copyhold tenure, it is unlikely to remain exercisable after the abolition of
copyhold/manorial incidents.

CURRENT STATUS:
HISTORIC RIGHT DIRECTLY PROVED.
CURRENT SURVIVAL / EXERCISE NOT PROVED.
Do NOT list as a present exercisable privilege unless later documents carry it forward.

========================================================================
BJ. WATLINGTON MARKET — HISTORIC FRANCHISE EVIDENCE, OWNERSHIP UNRESOLVED
========================================================================

The specialist Gazetteer of Markets and Fairs to 1516 records for:

WATLINGTON, NORFOLK

MARKET:
Prescriptive.

NOTE:
According to Dymond, a market existed there in 1252.

SOURCE:
https://archives.history.ac.uk/gazetteer/norf.html

IMPORTANT CORRECTION:
An earlier live PASS 5 update described this as a market "granted" in 1252.

That was too strong.

The gazetteer specifically classifies it as PRESCRIPTIVE and does not identify a charter
or named grantee.

A numismatic / market-history article reports that Watlington's market was out of use by
the seventeenth century.

DOWNLOADABLE SOURCE:
https://thetokensociety.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Volume_nine-1.pdf

CURRENT LEGAL FRAMEWORK:
HM Land Registry Practice Guide 18 states that a franchise:
- may arise from Crown charter/letters patent;
- may also be claimed by prescription;
- is separate from the physical land;
- market and fair franchises can be separately dealt with;
- first registration requires proof of devolution to the applicant;
- a prescription claim requires evidence of enjoyment/exercise.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/franchises/practice-guide-18-franchises

CURRENT STATUS:

HISTORIC WATLINGTON MARKET:
Evidenced.

LEGAL BASIS:
Recorded by the gazetteer as prescription.

OWNERSHIP BY TRUSSBUT/COLTS:
NOT PROVED.

CURRENT EXERCISE / CURRENT FRANCHISE TITLE:
NOT PROVED.

[Inference]
The report that the market fell out of use by the seventeenth century makes a modern
prescriptive-title case materially harder because current HMLR evidence requirements for
prescription include evidence of enjoyment/exercise.

DO NOT list "right to hold Watlington market" as a presently proved right of Colts.

SEPARATE STREAM:
The previously found Shouldham prescriptive market/fairs remain separate unless actual
title evidence combines them with Colts.

========================================================================
BK. MINES / MINERALS / CLAY / STONE / GRAVEL / QUARRIES
========================================================================

LEGAL CAPACITY TO SURVIVE:
Strong.

HM Land Registry PG65 confirms that on enfranchisement of copyhold:
- mineral ownership depended upon the custom of the particular manor;
- commonly the lord owned the minerals but could not work them without the copyholder's
consent;
- statutory enfranchisement could preserve mineral ownership/rights;
- an inclosure award could allot surface to a copyholder but minerals to the lord;
- compensation/enfranchisement agreements could also expressly EXTINGUISH preserved
mineral and sporting rights.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/registration-of-mines-and-minerals-pg65/practice-guide-65-registration-of-mines-and-minerals

CURRENT WATLINGTON COLTS EVIDENCE:
NO direct Colts mineral, quarry, clay, stone or gravel reservation has yet been found.

CURRENT STATUS:
LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL.
FACTUALLY UNPROVED FOR COLTS.

This is not a minor distinction.

To prove a current mineral right the project needs:
1. Watlington court/custom evidence;
2. proof particular affected parcels were former copyhold of THIS manor;
3. enfranchisement / compensation deeds showing mineral rights survived;
4. title/devolution showing the minerals/right were not later severed or released;
5. modern registered titles / filed deeds.

HIGHEST-VALUE SOURCES:
- 1435-36 court roll;
- 1512 court roll;
- 1749 inclosure award;
- pre-1926 court books;
- MAF 13 / MAF 27 compensation files;
- historic conveyances;
- current Land Registry titles.

========================================================================
BL. SPORTING / HUNTING / SHOOTING / FISHING / FOWLING
========================================================================

LEGAL CAPACITY TO SURVIVE:
Yes, these are expressly within the preserved Schedule 12 categories.

POSITIVE POST-1926 ESTATE EVIDENCE:

Forestry England's Shouldham and Bilney Forest Plan records:
- Forestry Commission management beginning in 1943;
- a 999-year lease from the Hare Estate at Stow Bardolph;
- SPORTING RIGHTS retained by the Hare Estate;
- exercise of those rights in the Shouldham Sincks area.

OFFICIAL DIRECT PDF:
https://www.forestryengland.uk/sites/default/files/documents/ShouldhamandBilneyForestPlan2016-2026_0.pdf

WHY 1943 IS IMPORTANT:
This is evidence AFTER compulsory copyhold enfranchisement that a substantive sporting
right was still being reserved by the Hare Estate over part of the wider estate.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
It does NOT yet prove:
- that the reservation originated as a Colts manorial right;
- that the demised land was former copyhold of Colts;
- that the sporting right remained attached to the lordship;
- that the right was conveyed with later transfers of the lordship;
- that the right belongs to the present claimant.

CURRENT STATUS:
POST-1926 HARE ESTATE SPORTING RIGHT EVIDENCED.
CONNECTION TO WATLINGTON COLTS LORDSHIP UNPROVED.

NEXT:
Recover the actual 1943 lease and map.

Extract:
- exact lessor;
- exact parcels;
- sporting reservation wording;
- game species;
- entry/access;
- whether mineral rights are also reserved;
- successors/assigns wording;
- whether reservation is to "the Estate", a named manor, or another owner;
- later assignments/variations.

========================================================================
BM. CHASE / WARREN
========================================================================

LEGAL CAPACITY TO SURVIVE:
Yes. Chase and warren are included in the Schedule 12 preserved categories.

LOCAL HISTORIC EVIDENCE:
Norfolk Heritage Explorer identifies a Shouldham Warren lease of 1634 and states that
leases could stipulate rabbits supplied to the household.

SOURCE:
https://www.heritage.norfolk.gov.uk/record-details?TNF2329-Rabbit-Warrens-Article=

CURRENT PROBLEM:
The actual 1634 lease remains missing.

Therefore we do NOT know:
- lessor;
- exact manor;
- whether "warren" is a legal franchise/right or a land-use/place-name in that deed;
- whether the right belonged to Colts;
- whether it was retained in the Hare consolidation;
- whether it survived enfranchisement.

CURRENT STATUS:
LEGALLY PRESERVABLE CATEGORY.
REAL SHOULDHAM HISTORIC LEASE TARGET.
NO CURRENT COLTS WARREN RIGHT PROVED.

========================================================================
BN. PISCARY / FISHERY
========================================================================

LEGAL CAPACITY TO SURVIVE:
Piscary/fishing rights fall within preserved categories.

EARLY HISTORY:
The auction/title narrative refers to a Domesday-era fishery in the early estate.

SOURCE:
https://feudaltitles.com/titles-index-u-z

EVIDENTIAL PROBLEM:
This is far too remote and too weakly connected to establish a current right.

No later Colts instrument has yet been found carrying a fishery/piscary forward.

CURRENT STATUS:
LEGALLY CAPABLE CATEGORY.
NO DIRECT CONTINUOUS COLTS PISCARY RIGHT PROVED.

DO NOT list as a current title privilege.

========================================================================
BO. 16 SHILLINGS RENT — 1506
========================================================================

HISTORIC EXISTENCE:
Directly proved by CP 25/1/170/197 no.106.

EXACT TYPE:
UNRESOLVED.

The final concord simply identifies "16 shillings rent".
It does not, from the abstract alone, establish whether this was:
- quit rent;
- chief rent;
- free rent;
- rent service;
- a rent attached to particular parcels;
- another rent.

STATUTORY IMPACT:
Law of Property Act 1922 section 140 expressly deals with heriot, quit rent, chief rent,
free rent and other manorial incidents.

CURRENT STATUS:
HISTORIC RENT PROVED.
NO MODERN SUBSISTING 16s RENT PROVED.

The nature and later devolution have to be established before saying it was extinguished
or survived in another legal form.

NEXT:
1512 court roll may identify the tenants/parcels/rent type.

========================================================================
BP. COURT BARON / CUSTOMARY COURT / COURT LEET
========================================================================

WATLINGTON:
1435-36 court baron and customary court is directly documented by the historic official
inventory.

1512:
a draft Watlington manor court roll survives at Oxfordshire History Centre.

1845:
White's directory reports yearly courts leet and baron for GAWSELS Manor, Watlington.

SOURCE:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1845.shtml

IMPORTANT:
The 1845 Gawsels courts are not proof of Colts courts in 1845.

CURRENT LEGAL POSITION:
The abolition of copyhold ended the last meaningful land-tenure function of manorial
courts.

CURRENT STATUS FOR COLTS:
HISTORIC MANOR COURT EXISTENCE PROVED FOR A WATLINGTON MANOR.
SPECIFIC IDENTIFICATION WITH COLTS STILL REQUIRES TITLE linkage.
NO MODERN COPYHOLD / FEUDAL COURT JURISDICTION IS BEING CLAIMED HERE.

The historic rolls remain evidentially valuable for proving customs that may underlie
surviving Schedule 12 rights.

========================================================================
BQ. HERIOTS / FINES / RELIEFS / FEALTY / SUIT / COPYHOLD INCIDENTS
========================================================================

LOCAL EXISTENCE:
Specific incidence in Watlington Colts cannot yet be asserted until the court rolls are
read.

LEGAL SURVIVAL:
These are not being treated as present exercisable rights.

Where they existed as manorial incidents/copyhold incidents, the 1922-1936
enfranchisement/extinguishment regime is the controlling change.

CURRENT LEDGER TREATMENT:
HISTORICAL ONLY / STATUTORY EXTINCTION REGIME.

Research them for:
- proof of manor identity;
- proof of copyhold parcels;
- proof of custom;
- ownership history;
- evidence that preserved rights existed.

Do not present them as modern privileges of lordship.

========================================================================
BR. COMMONS / WASTES / COMMON RIGHTS — 1749 TRANSFORMATION POINT
========================================================================

WATLINGTON-SPECIFIC LEGISLATION:

Watlington Inclosure Act 1748
22 Geo II private c.37
Royal Assent 26 May 1749

TITLE:
"An Act for enclosing and dividing certain Commons and Wastes, within the Manor and
Parish of Watlington, in the County of Norfolk."

STATUS:
Existence/title of Act verified.
Full Act/award/map still not recovered.

CURRENT IMPACT ANALYSIS:

Before enclosure, the manor/parish could contain:
- common;
- waste;
- pasture/common grazing interests;
- lord's soil of the waste;
- fold-related arrangements;
- access;
- customary uses.

The inclosure award could have:
- extinguished common rights in exchange for allotments;
- allotted waste to lord/tenants;
- laid out roads;
- created drains;
- fixed boundaries;
- preserved minerals;
- transformed foldcourses;
- imposed fencing/drainage duties.

WE CANNOT SAY WHICH OCCURRED IN WATLINGTON UNTIL THE AWARD IS FOUND.

CURRENT STATUS:
NO CURRENT OWNERSHIP OF COMMON/WASTE LAND FOLLOWS MERELY FROM OWNERSHIP OF THE LORDSHIP.
Any resulting land must be traced as land title.

HIGHEST PRIORITY:
Recover:
- Act;
- commissioners' award;
- map;
- claims;
- allotment schedule;
- road/drain provisions;
- mineral/fold reservations.

========================================================================
BS. ROADS / DRAINS / DYKES / EMBANKMENTS / PROTECTIVE WORKS
========================================================================

Certain liabilities for construction/maintenance/cleansing/repair survived copyhold
enfranchisement under Schedule 12.

This is especially relevant to the fenland geography.

HOWEVER:
No Colts-specific surviving liability/right has been found.

POTENTIAL SOURCES:
- 1435-36 court roll;
- 1512 court roll;
- 1749 Watlington award;
- 1794/1798 Shouldham enclosure records for the separate Shouldham stream;
- drainage authority records;
- Land Registry titles;
- compensation agreements.

CURRENT STATUS:
LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL IN CERTAIN FORMS.
NO COLTS-SPECIFIC CURRENT LIABILITY OR BENEFIT PROVED.

========================================================================
BT. SHOULDHAM PRIORY RIGHTS — KEEP SEPARATE
========================================================================

NRO HARE 2719
12 December 1587

The separately reconstructed Shouldham Priory-manor package includes leads for:
- TWO FOLD LIBERTIES;
- rectory interests;
- merchants' tolls;
- stallage;
- advowsons of St Margaret and All Saints;
- appurtenances.

These must NOT be added to the present Watlington Colts rights list merely because later
owners such as Gawdy/Hare held multiple estates.

CURRENT STATUS:
SEPARATE MANOR STREAM UNTIL RECOMBINATION / TRANSFER IS PROVED.

This is especially important because the 1506 Watlington instrument says:
ONE FREE FOLD.

HARE 2719 says:
TWO FOLD LIBERTIES in a Shouldham Priory-manor context.

They are NOT interchangeable evidence.

========================================================================
BU. PRESENT-RIGHTS LEDGER — PASS 5
========================================================================

RIGHT / ITEM
CURRENT WORKING STATUS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LORDSHIP / MANORIAL TITLE
CAPABLE OF SURVIVING.
The title is distinct from land and rights.
Current conveyance/title chain still required for final present ownership proof.

MANORIAL LAND / COLTS FARM / CAPITAL MESSUAGE
HISTORIC LAND EVIDENCED.
DOES NOT FOLLOW THE LORDSHIP AUTOMATICALLY.
Modern ownership requires registered/unregistered land-title evidence.

16s RENT (1506)
HISTORICALLY DIRECT.
Exact character unresolved.
No current subsisting rent established.

ONE FREE FOLD (1506)
HISTORICALLY DIRECT.
Current survival unproved.
1749 enclosure + 1922/1926 changes are critical.
[Inference] likely transformed/extinguished if it remained only a customary copyhold
incident, but this is not yet proved.

ADVOWSON ST PETER (1506)
HISTORICALLY DIRECT.
NOT A PRESENT APPENDANT MANORIAL RIGHT.
1986 Measure section 32 severed any advowson then appendant to a manor/land.
Any current patronage is a separate ecclesiastical right.

COURT BARON / CUSTOMARY COURT
HISTORIC WATLINGTON COURT PROVED 1435-36; 1512 roll survives.
No modern copyhold tenure jurisdiction.

HERIOTS / COPYHOLD FINES / RELIEFS / FEALTY / SUIT
If locally found, historical only for present purposes.
Controlled by 1922-1936 extinguishment/enfranchisement regime.

MINES / MINERALS
LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL.
NO DIRECT COLTS RIGHT YET PROVED.

LIMESTONE / LIME / CLAY / STONE / GRAVEL
LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL.
NO DIRECT COLTS RIGHT YET PROVED.

PITS / QUARRIES
LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL.
NO DIRECT COLTS RIGHT YET PROVED.

ENTRY / SEARCH / WORKING RIGHTS FOR MINERALS
LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL.
NO DIRECT COLTS RIGHT YET PROVED.

SPORTING / HUNTING / SHOOTING / FOWLING
LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL.
POST-1926 HARE ESTATE SPORTING RESERVATION EVIDENCED IN 1943 LEASE CONTEXT.
CONNECTION TO COLTS LORDSHIP UNPROVED.

WARREN / CHASE
LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL.
1634 Shouldham Warren lease is a genuine historic target.
COLTS ownership/current devolution unproved.

PISCARY / FISHERY
LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL.
No continuous Colts proof.

WATLINGTON MARKET
HISTORIC PRESCRIPTIVE MARKET EVIDENCED.
Ownership by Colts not proved.
Current franchise/devolution/exercise not proved.

SHOULDHAM MARKET / FAIRS
Historic stream evidenced separately.
Not assigned to Colts.

TOLLS / STALLAGE
Shouldham Priory stream lead.
Not assigned to Colts.

COMMONS / WASTE
1749 Watlington inclosure is controlling transformation point.
No present common/waste ownership inferred from lordship.

ROADS / WAYS / DRAINS / DYKES / PROTECTIVE WORKS
Some liabilities legally preservable.
No current Colts-specific right/liability proved.

TIMBER
No present Colts timber right proved.
Separate 1798 Shouldham timber licence remains separate evidence.

VILLAGE GREEN CONTROL
Not inherent in lordship.
No Colts right proved.

DOMESDAY MILL / FISHERY / CHURCHES
Historic estate context only.
No present right can be carried forward from Domesday evidence alone.

========================================================================
BV. RIGHTS-IMPACT TIMELINE
========================================================================

1252
Watlington, Norfolk market recorded by specialist gazetteer as prescriptive.
Owner/manor stream unresolved.

1390 / 1403 / 1427
Trussbut tenure evidence increasingly anchors the Watlington-containing fee.
Does not by itself enumerate the later surviving rights.

1435-1436
Watlington manor court baron + customary court roll documented.
Potential first-class evidence of actual local customs.

1506
CP 25/1/170/197 no.106 expressly bundles:
- manor;
- 16s rent;
- ONE FREE FOLD;
- St Peter advowson;
- defined lands.

1512
Surviving draft Watlington manor court roll.
Potential evidence of actual exercise immediately after 1506.

1587
Separate Shouldham Priory-manor transaction HARE 2719:
two folds/tolls/stallage/advowsons etc.
Do not merge automatically.

1587 / 1596
Colt -> Shouldham title assurance unresolved.
Critical for determining which rights followed the Colts title.

1634
Shouldham Warren lease.
Actual instrument still missing.

1749
Watlington, Norfolk inclosure Act.
Potential transformation/extinction/allotment point for commons/waste/fold-related
interests.
Award/map missing.

1791-1824
John Davis Plestow recorded rector and patron of Watlington.
Patronage has a later independent history.

1841 / 1852 / 1858 / 1894
Copyhold Acts allowed earlier parcel-by-parcel enfranchisement before compulsory
enfranchisement.
Any affected Colts parcels may therefore have reserved or extinguished rights earlier
than 1926.

1883
Watlington patronage recorded with Gilbert Barker.

1 JANUARY 1926
Copyhold abolished under Law of Property Act 1922 regime.
Old customary tenure/court system ceases to operate as before.
Preserved Schedule 12 rights remain possible.

c. 1936
Section 140 ten-year extinguishment point for unresolved manorial incidents under the
1922 Act regime.

1943
Hare Estate -> Forestry Commission 999-year lease begins.
Sporting rights expressly reported as RETAINED by Hare Estate.
Major post-enfranchisement survival evidence, but Colts link unproved.

PATRONAGE (BENEFICES) MEASURE 1986
Any advowson still appendant to land/manor statutorily severed and converted to an
advowson in gross.
Patronage cannot be sold for valuable consideration.

13 OCTOBER 2003
Land Registration Act 2002 regime:
new first registration of lordship title no longer available.
Existing lordships can continue, including off-register.

MIDNIGHT 12 OCTOBER 2013
Manorial rights lost automatic overriding status.
Unprotected rights did NOT automatically cease merely because of that date.
Priority against later purchasers depends on registration/disposition history.

========================================================================
BW. WHAT CAN CURRENTLY BE SAID TO "EXIST TODAY"?
========================================================================

The evidence supports three different levels.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
A. CURRENT CATEGORY WITH STRONG LEGAL BASIS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

THE LORDSHIP TITLE ITSELF:
A manorial lordship is capable of continuing as an incorporeal hereditament independent
of land and rights.

This does NOT answer who presently owns it; ownership depends on the current conveyance
chain.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
B. HISTORIC RIGHTS WHICH ARE NOT CURRENTLY PROVED AS APPENDANT RIGHTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ONE FREE FOLD
16s rent
historic court incidents
advowson
market
commons/waste

Each has either:
- an unresolved later chain;
- a known statutory transformation;
- a likely enclosure impact;
- or explicit severance in modern law.

The advowson has the clearest legal outcome:
it cannot now be an appendant right passing automatically with the manor because of
section 32 of the 1986 Measure.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
C. RIGHTS WHICH COULD STILL EXIST IF THE DOCUMENTARY CHAIN IS PROVED
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

HIGH-VALUE SURVIVAL TARGETS:
- mines/minerals;
- limestone/lime/clay/stone/gravel;
- pits/quarries;
- ancillary entry/search/working rights;
- sporting/hunting/shooting/fishing/fowling;
- chase/warren;
- piscary;
- market/fair franchise;
- certain drainage/protective-work liabilities.

NONE of those should yet be represented as a present Colts right merely from possession
of the lordship.

The strongest positive factual survivor found so far is:
1943 HARE ESTATE RETENTION OF SPORTING RIGHTS.

But the Colts-title link remains unproved.

========================================================================
BX. DOCUMENTS NOW MOST LIKELY TO CHANGE THE CURRENT-RIGHTS RESULT
========================================================================

TIER 1 — DECISIVE / NEAR-DECISIVE

1. 1435-36 Watlington court baron/customary court roll
- modern shelfmark/location required;
- inspect local customs.

2. Oxfordshire History Centre GB 160 SL26/6 (1512)
- obtain full images/transcription.

3. Watlington 1749 inclosure award + map
- determine treatment of commons, waste, fold, roads, drains, lord's allotments,
minerals.

4. Current Watlington Colts lordship conveyance + all schedules/reservations.

5. Pre-1926 compensation / enfranchisement papers:
- MAF 13;
- MAF 27;
- private estate compensation agreements.

6. Land Registry current/historic titles and filed deeds for former Colts parcels.

7. Actual 1943 Hare Estate -> Forestry Commission lease and map.

TIER 2 — TITLE / RIGHTS BRIDGES

8. Original 1587 George Colt -> Thomas Shouldham assurance.
9. Original 1596 "Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes" assurance.
10. HARE 2495 full 1633 field book.
11. HARE 2719 original 1587 Shouldham Priory transaction.
12. 1634 Shouldham Warren lease.
13. ACC 2022/153 late-15th/early-16th-century extent.
14. Tittleshall alias Trusbutts court book 1622-1785.
15. HARE estate conveyances when Colts/Hare/Plestow/Coote/Holmes interests were separated.

TIER 3 — SEPARATE MODERN REGISTERS

16. HMLR index of relating franchises and manors.
17. Diocese of Norwich register of patrons for Watlington benefice.
18. Commons register / drainage records where relevant.

========================================================================
BY. PASS 5 — NEW URL / DOWNLOAD SOURCES
========================================================================

Official old inventory containing 1435-36 Watlington court roll:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/General_Report_to_the_King_in_Council_from_the_Honourable_Board_of_Commissioners_on_the_Public_Records_IA_dli.granth.75463.pdf

1512 Watlington court roll catalogue:
https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb160-sl26/sl26/6

HMLR PG65 — mines/minerals:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/registration-of-mines-and-minerals-pg65/practice-guide-65-registration-of-mines-and-minerals

HMLR PG18 — franchises:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/franchises/practice-guide-18-franchises

Law of Property Act 1922 official PDF:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1922/16/pdfs/ukpga_19220016_en.pdf

TNA historical/legislative background:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archives-sector/legislation/historical-and-legislative-background/

TNA manorial documents/lordships/MDR guide:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/manorial-documents-lordships-how-to-use-manorial-document-register/

TNA MDR:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archives-sector/finding-records-in-discovery-and-other-databases/manorial-documents-register/

TNA manors guide:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/manors

Watlington market gazetteer:
https://archives.history.ac.uk/gazetteer/norf.html

Market-history / token article PDF:
https://thetokensociety.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Volume_nine-1.pdf

John Davis Plestow — rector and patron:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/PageAlumni_Oxoniensis_1715-1886_volume_3.djvu/355

White 1845 Watlington:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1845.shtml

White 1883 Watlington:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1883.shtml

1923 Watlington patron A.E.H. Birch source:
https://anglicanhistory.org/england/congresses/hickton_blain2022.pdf

Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 official PDF:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukcm/1986/3/pdfs/ukcm_19860003_en.pdf

MDR direct search surfaced in this pass:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/manor-search?SubjectID=172296

========================================================================
BZ. PASS 5 — NEW FINDINGS SUMMARY
========================================================================

1. The project now has an explicit RIGHT-BY-RIGHT current-survival methodology rather
than treating ownership of the manor as ownership of all historic incidents.

2. HMLR's evidential test has been built directly into the project:
copyhold of this manor + custom of this manor + survival through enfranchisement +
present title to this right / no severance.

3. An old official inventory specifically identifies a WATLINGTON manor court baron and
customary court roll from 1435-36.

4. Oxfordshire History Centre holds a 1512 draft court roll of the MANOR OF WATLINGTON
IN NORFOLK, reference GB 160 SL26/6.

5. Those two rolls are now central to proving actual customs, not merely theoretical
manorial powers.

6. The 1506 bundle remains the strongest direct historic rights instrument:
16s rent + ONE FREE FOLD + St Peter advowson.

7. The ADVOWSON has a strong modern legal outcome:
section 32 of the Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986 severed any advowson still
appendant to land/manor.
It should NOT now be represented as an appendant privilege of the manor title.

8. The 1506 FREE FOLD is historic fact but current survival is unproved.
The 1749 inclosure award is likely the decisive intermediate document.

9. Watlington, Norfolk had a historically evidenced PRESCRIPTIVE market noted in 1252.
Ownership by the Colts manor and current franchise title are not proved.

10. Minerals/quarries/access rights, sporting rights, warren, piscary and certain
drainage liabilities are the main categories that legally COULD still survive.

11. None of those categories is yet proved as a present right of Watlington Colts.

12. The strongest post-1926 factual survivor found so far remains the HARE ESTATE
sporting-right reservation in the 1943 Forestry lease context.
Connection to the Colts lordship is still unproved.

13. Copyhold and ordinary feudal/customary incidents are now separated in the ledger
from legally preservable substantive rights.

14. The 1749 Watlington enclosure award/map, 1435-36 roll, 1512 roll, pre-1926
enfranchisement/compensation papers, current parcel titles and the actual 1943 lease
are now the documents most likely to change the answer to "what exists today?"

========================================================================
CA. PASS 6 — CURRENT-RIGHTS PROOF, SEVERANCE AND EXTINCTION
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 6 continues the PASS 5 right-by-right method.

This pass was deliberately restricted to evidence which can change the answer from:

HISTORIC RIGHT
->
CURRENTLY SURVIVING / EXTINGUISHED / SEVERED / OWNERSHIP UNPROVED.

The principal findings are:

1. The public 2025 Watlington Colts sale catalogue does NOT itself establish what
operative rights passed in the recent sale.

2. The seller's own general terms expressly warn that historical rights in catalogue
particulars must be legally established by the purchaser and that a vendor may retain
some or all rights, so a sale can be TITLE ONLY.

3. This makes the actual modern contract/conveyance and any schedule of included,
excluded or reserved rights the single most important current-title document.

4. The 1435-36 Watlington court roll has been downgraded:
it is definitely a Watlington manorial court record, but its old inventory context
appears to place it in a Ramsey Abbey block.
[Inference] It should not presently be treated as a Colts court roll.

5. The 1512 Watlington, Norfolk draft court roll remains highly important but is likewise
not yet identified safely as Colts until its contents/lord/provenance are inspected.

6. The 1943 Hare Estate sporting-right reservation is strengthened by evidence that the
Shouldham Sincks site was still owned by Stow Estates in 2021, but this does NOT prove
that the sporting right follows the Watlington Colts lordship.

7. Separate 1611 and 1628 deeds demonstrate that neighbouring manors were being treated
as distinct legal property packages even when the same families/estate networks were
involved. Common ownership therefore cannot be used to merge their rights.

8. c.1900 Hare/Hoff land-exchange plans expose a new pre-1926 severance/reservation target.

9. Robert Holmes Edleston's surviving manorial papers at Durham include extensive
correspondence about purchase of manorial rights and extinguishment of manorial
incidents, but no Watlington-specific item surfaced in the online catalogue in this
pass.

========================================================================
CB. DECISIVE MODERN POINT — 2025 SALE PARTICULARS DO NOT PROVE THE RIGHTS CONVEYED
========================================================================

SOURCE:
Manorial Services, Private Treaty Catalogue, Vol. 11, 2025.

DIRECT PDF:
https://www.manorialservices.com/uploads/1/0/1/4/101463086/manorial_services_lord_of_the_manor_winter_2025_vol_11b.pdf

WATLINGTON COLTS:
The catalogue has a dedicated Watlington Colts lot and repeats the historical title
narrative, including the alleged 1596 conveyance wording.

IMPORTANTLY:
The Watlington Colts lot description does NOT set out a specific present package such as:
- minerals;
- sporting rights;
- market franchise;
- warren;
- rent;
- waste;
- free fold;
- fishery;
- rights of entry;
as rights expressly included in the lot.

The catalogue's GENERAL TERMS state that:
- particulars are guidance only;
- references to geographical extent are historical;
- rights referred to in particulars, or rights which may be associated with lordships,
are to be taken as historical;
- operative historic rights associated with a purchase must be legally established by
each new owner.

The catalogue's general "Manorial rights" section also states that:
- a vendor may retain all or some rights;
- in that case the sale can be of the TITLE ONLY;
- research is needed to establish which rights, if any, remain.

STATUS:
[Verified from the seller/intermediary's own 2025 catalogue.]

CRITICAL LIMIT:
This is a general warning in the catalogue.
It does NOT prove that the Watlington Colts vendor in fact retained any particular right.

CURRENT-RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:
The public sale particulars are NOT sufficient evidence that any historic substantive
right passed with the modern sale.

THE ACTUAL MODERN SALE CONTRACT / CONVEYANCE IS NOW THE DECISIVE DOCUMENT.

It must be checked for:
- definition of "Title" / "Lordship";
- whether rights are expressly included;
- whether rights are expressly excluded;
- reservations to vendor;
- assignment of benefits;
- schedules;
- title documents delivered;
- recitals to prior conveyances;
- representations/disclaimers;
- rights already severed before sale.

This is now PRIORITY #1 for the present-rights question.

========================================================================
CC. 1435-36 WATLINGTON COURT ROLL — IMPORTANT DOWNGRADE / CORRECTION
========================================================================

PASS 5 treated the old official inventory entry as a potentially direct Watlington court
custom source for Colts.

The entry remains real:

"WATLINGTON, manor.
Roll of court baron and customary court,
anno 14 Hen. VI."

DATE:
1435-1436.

SOURCE:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/General_Report_to_the_King_in_Council_from_the_Honourable_Board_of_Commissioners_on_the_Public_Records_IA_dli.granth.75463.pdf

PASS 6 CORRECTION:
The surrounding inventory block is described as accounts/documents relating to Norfolk
manors and lands "belonging to this abbey", with nearby entries referring expressly to
the Abbot and Convent of Ramsey / Abbot of Ramsey.

[Inference]
This makes RAMSEY ABBEY provenance/manor identity substantially more likely than a direct
Trussbut/Colts identification.

CURRENT EVIDENTIAL STATUS:
- WATLINGTON court baron/customary court existed: YES.
- exact modern repository/shelfmark: NOT YET RECOVERED.
- identification as Watlington Colts/Trusbutts: NOT PROVED.
- safe evidence of a Colts custom: NO, not at present.

RIGHTS-LEDGER IMPACT:
The 1435-36 roll must be moved from:
"POTENTIAL COLTS CUSTOM EVIDENCE"

to:
"SEPARATE / UNIDENTIFIED WATLINGTON MANOR STREAM UNTIL PROVEN."

This is important because HMLR's modern test requires proof that the claimed custom was
a custom of THIS PARTICULAR MANOR.

========================================================================
CD. 1512 WATLINGTON NORFOLK COURT ROLL — STILL HIGH PRIORITY, IDENTITY UNPROVED
========================================================================

REPOSITORY:
Oxfordshire History Centre

REFERENCE:
GB 160 SL26/6

TITLE:
Draft Court Roll of Manor of Watlington in Norfolk

DATE:
1512

CATALOGUE:
https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb160-sl26/sl26/6

STATUS:
[Verified at archive-catalogue level in PASS 5.]
The catalogue endpoint was inaccessible to the web retriever in PASS 6, but the previously
recovered reference/title remain the working archive citation.

CURRENT POSITION:
Its DATE remains exceptionally valuable:
1512 is only six years after the 1506 fine carrying:
- 16s rent;
- one free fold;
- St Peter advowson.

BUT:
The title "Manor of Watlington in Norfolk" is not enough to identify it automatically as
the Wyatt/Pynkeney manor or Colts/Trusbutts.

REQUIRED FROM THE ROLL:
- lord's name;
- steward;
- tenants;
- places/parcels;
- rents;
- fold/foldage/foldcourse;
- heriots/fines;
- waste/common;
- fisheries/warren;
- roads/drainage;
- any cross-reference to Wyatt, Pynkeney, Colt, Trusbut or known parcels.

CURRENT STATUS:
HIGH-VALUE DOCUMENT.
NOT YET SAFE COLTS CUSTOM EVIDENCE.

========================================================================
CE. 1611 AND 1628 DEEDS — COMMON OWNERSHIP DOES NOT MERGE RIGHTS
========================================================================

Two exact Norfolk Record Office deed references materially strengthen the project's
"do not import neighbouring rights" rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
26 NOVEMBER 1611
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

REFERENCE:
Hare 3083/2, 201 x 6

TITLE:
Indenture of Bargain & Sale

PARTIES:
1. Sir Robert Riche of Wallington, knight, and Dame Fraunces his wife
2. William Battes of Shouldham Thorpe, gent.

PROPERTY:
- Manor of Shouldham Thorpe alias Garboysthorpe
- Foston
- Russells
- messuages, lands and tenements in Shouldham Thorpe, Foston and Stradsett

CATALOGUE:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/4a8a576e-85b9-42a6-8ea7-b99900bbbd93

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
11 APRIL 1628
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

REFERENCE:
Hare 3085, 201 x 6

TITLE:
Indenture — Deed to Lead the Uses of a Recovery

PARTIES INCLUDE:
- Leonard Buttes and Johanna his wife
- Sir John Hare of Stowe Bardolph
- Raphe Whitfeld
- Clement Spelman

PROPERTY:
- Thorps alias Shouldham Thorpe alias Garboysthorpe
- Foston alias Fodeston Russells
- Gawsells
- appurtenant property in Shouldham Thorpe, Foston and Stradsett

CATALOGUE:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/297d3b1d-dad8-42d6-b050-1bcf5e0e2de1

STATUS:
[Verified official NRO/TNA catalogue descriptions.]

SIGNIFICANCE FOR RIGHTS:
These deeds show neighbouring manors being identified and assured as distinct named
property packages in the same early-17th-century estate network.

Neither catalogue description names Watlington Colts.

Therefore:
- Riche / Gawdy / Buttes / Hare common ownership or family connection does NOT itself
transfer Gawsells/Shouldham Thorpe rights into Colts;
- each manor's rights still require a deed/custom/title bridge.

This directly reinforces the exclusion of:
- Shouldham Priory's two folds;
- its tolls/stallage;
- Gawsells court rights;
- other neighbouring manor incidents;
unless an instrument expressly combines or transfers them.

========================================================================
CF. c.1900 HARE / HOFF EXCHANGE — NEW SEVERANCE / RESERVATION TARGET
========================================================================

REFERENCE:
Hare 6956/1-5

DATE:
c.1900

DESCRIPTION:
Five 6-inch Ordnance Survey sheets covering:
- Shouldham;
- Shouldham Thorpe;
- Marham;
- Wormegay;

marked for EXCHANGE between Hare and Hoff.

OFFICIAL CATALOGUE:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/c587d73c-e321-4732-afc5-dce032497f69

RELATED MATERIAL:
The catalogue expressly says:
"See Hare 6374-5."

STATUS:
[Verified official catalogue evidence.]

WHY THIS MATTERS:
The exchange falls BEFORE compulsory abolition of copyhold and close enough to the
modern estate period to be a plausible point for:
- land severance;
- mineral reservation;
- sporting reservation;
- access rights;
- easements;
- drainage liabilities;
- exchange of former-copyhold parcels.

NO SUCH RESERVATION IS YET PROVED.

HIGH PRIORITY:
Retrieve HARE 6374-5 and determine:
- exact exchange parcels;
- whether Colts Farm / former Colts copyhold appears;
- minerals reserved;
- game/sporting rights reserved;
- lordship/manorial incidents mentioned;
- rights of way/drainage;
- whether any rights were retained by Hare after surface land exchange.

========================================================================
CG. SPORTING RIGHTS — 1943 TO 2021 ESTATE CONTINUITY
========================================================================

OFFICIAL FORESTRY EVIDENCE:
The Shouldham and Bilney Forest Plan records:
- Forestry Commission management beginning in 1943;
- 999-year lease from the Hare Estate at Stow Bardolph;
- SPORTING RIGHTS retained by the estate;
- those rights being exercised in the Shouldham Sincks area.

DIRECT PDF:
https://www.forestryengland.uk/sites/default/files/documents/ShouldhamandBilneyForestPlan2016-2026_0.pdf

PASS 6 ADDITION:
Shouldham Parish Council, 23 January 2021, states:
- Shouldham Sincks is owned by STOW ESTATES;
- Stow Estates had given public vehicle access;
- access remained required for Stow Estates and residents.

SOURCE:
https://shouldham-pc.gov.uk/2021/01/23/shouldham-sincks-change-of-access/

STATUS:
[Verified for site ownership/access statement in 2021.]

WHAT THIS STRENGTHENS:
The old Hare/Stow estate interest in the Sincks did not simply disappear after the 1943
lease. A Stow Estates ownership/control interest was still being publicly identified
there in 2021.

WHAT THIS DOES NOT PROVE:
It does NOT prove:
- Stow Estates owned the sporting right in 2021;
- the sporting right was attached to Watlington Colts;
- the sporting right followed the lordship sale;
- who owns the sporting right today;
- exact land covered by the 1943 reservation.

CURRENT RIGHTS STATUS:
SPORTING RIGHT:
POST-1926 EXISTENCE / RESERVATION = STRONGLY EVIDENCED.
ACTUAL EXERCISE = EVIDENCED BY OFFICIAL FORESTRY PLAN.
COLTS TITLE LINK = UNPROVED.
CURRENT RIGHT OWNER = UNVERIFIED.

ACTUAL 1943 LEASE STILL REQUIRED.

========================================================================
CH. 1997 SPORTING-RIGHTS RATING CHANGE — NOT AN EXTINGUISHMENT OF TITLE
========================================================================

HMRC / Valuation Office guidance records the Local Government and Rating Act 1997 change.

From 1 April 1997:
- hereditaments consisting wholly of severed sporting rights were deleted from rating
lists;
- severed sporting-right hereditaments ceased to be rateable.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/rating-manual-section-6-part-3-valuation-of-all-property-classes/section-950-the-treatment-of-sporting-rights

IMPORTANT:
This is a RATING / TAX TREATMENT.

It does NOT say the underlying sporting PROPERTY RIGHT was extinguished.

RIGHTS TIMELINE CONSEQUENCE:
Do not mistakenly treat 1 April 1997 as an end date for the Hare/Stow sporting right.
It is relevant to valuation/rating, not proof of extinction of title.

========================================================================
CI. ROBERT HOLMES EDLeston — DURHAM MANORIAL PAPERS
========================================================================

A major modern-document route is Robert Holmes Edleston's surviving archive at Durham.

DURHAM RECORD OFFICE:
Edleston family / manorial material includes extensive correspondence and papers about:
- purchases of manorial rights;
- manor courts;
- rentals;
- extinguishment of manorial incidents;
- legal advice around the 1922-1930s transition.

CATALOGUE ROUTE:
https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=

RELATED EDLeston ESTATE PAPERS:
https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=N&ItemID=169656&ItemNum=100&Keyword=Congregational&PageNum=1&Variations=Y

EXAMPLES EXPOSED IN THE ONLINE CATALOGUE INCLUDE:
- correspondence on extinguishment of manorial incidents, 1924-1940;
- letters between E.R. Hanby Holmes and R.H. Edleston about extinguishment,
1927-1929;
- Norfolk copy court roll material;
- notes on preparation for manor courts;
- papers about purchase of other manors/manorial rights.

PASS 6 SEARCH RESULT:
No text match for "Watlington" surfaced in the exposed D/Ed 10 catalogue page.

IMPORTANT:
This absence is NOT evidence that no Watlington file exists.

The public 2025 title narrative states that a transfer to Robert Holmes Edleston occurred
in 1929, which places the alleged acquisition in exactly the period in which his surviving
papers show him actively buying manorial interests and dealing with statutory
extinguishment issues elsewhere.

[Inference]
If a Watlington purchase file survives in his archive, it could be one of the best
sources for deciding whether the 1929 acquisition consisted of:
- lordship title only;
- title + rents/incidents;
- title + substantive retained rights;
- or a package already affected by extinguishment/enfranchisement.

HIGH PRIORITY ARCHIVE ENQUIRY TERMS:
- Watlington
- Watlington Colts
- Watlington Trusbutts / Trussbutts
- Mary Humphreys
- Coote
- 1929
- Norfolk
- Stow / Hare
- manorial rights
- purchase of manor
- extinguishment of incidents

========================================================================
CJ. CURRENT TITLE CHAIN — PUBLIC SOURCES STILL STOP SHORT OF THE OPERATIVE DEED
========================================================================

The public 2025 catalogue states that:
- the manor remained with Hare;
- later passed with Watlington Hall / manors to Plestow;
- then to George Coote;
- and in 1929 Mary Humphreys sold the manor to Robert Holmes Edleston.

SOURCE:
https://www.manorialservices.com/uploads/1/0/1/4/101463086/manorial_services_lord_of_the_manor_winter_2025_vol_11b.pdf

STATUS:
[Secondary sale-history narrative.]

PASS 6 WEB SEARCH:
No independently exposed 1929 Watlington Colts conveyance was recovered.

CURRENT CONSEQUENCE:
The project still lacks the actual operative modern deed(s) necessary to answer:
"What exact substantive rights reached the present lordship?"

The public narrative is useful for finding the deed, but is not a substitute for it.

========================================================================
CK. 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE — NO FALSE CLOSURE
========================================================================

The Norfolk Act remains:

Watlington Inclosure Act 1748
22 Geo II private c.37
Royal Assent 26 May 1749.

Historical bibliography confirms:
1749 — "For inclosing and dividing Watlington Commons."

SOURCE:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a7/The_Norfolk_topographers_manual-_being_a_catalogue_of_the_books_and_engravings_hitherto_published_in_relation_to_the_county_IA_b29349734.pdf

PASS 6:
No full Norfolk award/map/commissioners' claims were recovered online.

SEARCH WARNING:
Search engines continue to return large amounts of WATLINGTON, OXFORDSHIRE enclosure
material. None of that has been imported into this Norfolk rights chain.

CURRENT RIGHTS IMPACT:
The award remains potentially decisive for:
- ONE FREE FOLD;
- commons;
- waste;
- lord's allotments;
- roads;
- drains;
- mineral reservations;
- exchanges;
- compensation.

No conclusion about the fate of the 1506 free fold should be hardened until this record
is found.

========================================================================
CL. MAF 13 / MAF 27 — ENFRANCHISEMENT / COMPENSATION SEARCH STATUS
========================================================================

PASS 6 searches did not expose a Watlington Colts / Watlington Norfolk item in the
online index for the relevant Ministry of Agriculture compensation/enfranchisement
series.

THIS DOES NOT MEAN NO FILE EXISTS.

The relevant search remains:
- Watlington
- Shouldham
- Colts
- Trusbutts
- Hare
- Plestow
- Coote
- Humphreys
- Edleston
- former copyhold parcels

WHY THIS MATTERS:
A compensation/enfranchisement agreement may expressly show whether:
- minerals survived;
- sporting rights survived;
- manorial rents/incidents were compensated;
- rights were released;
- former copyhold parcels were converted to freehold with reservations.

CURRENT STATUS:
NO WATLINGTON-SPECIFIC MAF FILE RECOVERED ONLINE IN PASS 6.

========================================================================
CM. PASS 6 — RIGHTS STATUS CHANGES
========================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LORDSHIP / MANORIAL TITLE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BEFORE PASS 6:
Capable of surviving; current deed required.

PASS 6 CHANGE:
The 2025 seller catalogue itself confirms that sale particulars do not establish
operative historic rights and warns that a sale may be title-only where rights are
retained.

CURRENT:
LORDSHIP CAN EXIST.
WHAT RIGHTS PASSED IN THE MODERN SALE = NOT PROVED WITHOUT CONTRACT/CONVEYANCE.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ONE FREE FOLD
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

No change in historical proof:
1506 = direct.

No current survival proof.

1749 award remains decisive.

CURRENT:
HISTORICALLY PROVED.
PRESENT EXERCISE = NOT PROVED.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
16s RENT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

No new later rental proving the same 1506 rent.

CURRENT:
HISTORICALLY PROVED.
TYPE / MODERN SURVIVAL = UNRESOLVED.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ADVOWSON
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

No reversal of PASS 5 result.

CURRENT:
HISTORICALLY DIRECT IN 1506.
NOT A PRESENT APPENDANT MANORIAL RIGHT AFTER 1986.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COURT / CUSTOMARY RIGHTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PASS 6 DOWNGRADE:
1435-36 Watlington roll is no longer safe Colts evidence.

1512 SL26/6 remains uninspected and exact manor identity unproved.

CURRENT:
NO SAFELY IDENTIFIED COLTS COURT ROLL HAS YET BEEN READ TO PROVE A LOCAL
MINERAL / SPORTING / WASTE / FOLD CUSTOM.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MINERALS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

No direct reservation found.

CURRENT:
LEGALLY CAPABLE.
FACTUALLY UNPROVED.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SPORTING RIGHTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PASS 6 UPGRADE:
1943 official plan = retained by Hare Estate + exercised in Sincks.
2021 = Sincks publicly identified as owned by Stow Estates.

CURRENT:
REAL POST-1926 ESTATE SPORTING RIGHT = STRONG EVIDENCE.
COLTS TITLE CONNECTION = UNPROVED.
CURRENT RIGHTS OWNER = UNVERIFIED.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
WARREN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

No 1634 original recovered.

CURRENT:
HISTORIC SHOULDHAM TARGET.
COLTS / MODERN DEVOLUTION UNPROVED.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MARKET
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

No change:
Watlington prescriptive market historically evidenced.
Colts ownership/current franchise unproved.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMONS / WASTE / FOLD-DEPENDENT RIGHTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

No change:
1749 enclosure award remains necessary.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gawsells / SHOULDHAM THORPE / PRIORY RIGHTS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PASS 6 strengthens EXCLUSION.

1611 and 1628 deeds show separate named manor packages.

CURRENT:
DO NOT IMPORT THEIR RIGHTS INTO COLTS WITHOUT AN EXPRESS TITLE/RIGHT TRANSFER.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LAND / COLTS FARM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

c.1900 Hare/Hoff exchange maps create a new possible severance point.

CURRENT:
PHYSICAL ESTATE HISTORY AND INCORPOREAL LORDSHIP/RIGHTS HISTORY MUST BE
TRACED SEPARATELY.

========================================================================
CN. PASS 6 — CURRENT "WHAT MAY EXIST TODAY?" SNAPSHOT
========================================================================

CATEGORY 1 — PROVED AS A LEGALLY POSSIBLE CONTINUING THING
----------------------------------------------------------

LORDSHIP TITLE:
Yes, as a category.
Exact rights conveyed with the modern title remain dependent on the modern deed.

CATEGORY 2 — HISTORICALLY PROVED, BUT NOT CURRENTLY EXERCISABLE / APPENDANT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADVOWSON:
historic 1506 right;
not now appendant to manor after 1986 statutory severance.

ORDINARY COPYHOLD / FEUDAL INCIDENTS:
historical where proved;
not treated as current lordship powers.

CATEGORY 3 — HISTORICALLY PROVED, CURRENT SURVIVAL UNKNOWN
-----------------------------------------------------------

ONE FREE FOLD.
16s RENT.

CATEGORY 4 — LEGALLY CAPABLE OF SURVIVAL, BUT NO COLTS CHAIN YET
----------------------------------------------------------------

MINES / MINERALS.
CLAY / STONE / GRAVEL.
QUARRIES.
ANCILLARY WORKING / ENTRY RIGHTS.
WARREN / CHASE.
PISCARY.
WATLINGTON MARKET FRANCHISE.
CERTAIN DRAINAGE / PROTECTIVE-WORK RIGHTS OR LIABILITIES.

CATEGORY 5 — POSITIVE POST-1926 SUBSTANTIVE RIGHT EXISTS IN WIDER ESTATE,
BUT COLTS CONNECTION UNPROVED
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

SPORTING RIGHTS:
1943 Hare Estate reservation + exercise in Sincks is the strongest present-era
substantive-right lead.

Do NOT yet describe it as:
"the sporting right of Watlington Colts."

It may be:
- a severed estate right;
- a right retained with particular freehold/leasehold land;
- a wider Stow/Hare Estate right;
- or a former manorial right.

Only the lease/title chain can decide.

========================================================================
CO. PASS 6 — REVISED DECISIVE DOCUMENT ORDER
========================================================================

1. MODERN WATLINGTON COLTS SALE CONTRACT / CONVEYANCE
including schedules, reservations, title documents and any seller's epitome.

2. 1512 OXFORDSHIRE HISTORY CENTRE GB 160 SL26/6
full images/transcription and provenance.

3. 1749 WATLINGTON NORFOLK INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP + CLAIMS.

4. ACTUAL 1943 HARE ESTATE -> FORESTRY COMMISSION LEASE + PLAN.

5. HARE 6374-5
documents related to c.1900 Hare/Hoff exchange maps HARE 6956/1-5.

6. DURHAM RECORD OFFICE
targeted Watlington/1929 Edleston enquiry.

7. MAF 13 / MAF 27
compensation/enfranchisement records.

8. 1587 GEORGE COLT -> THOMAS SHOULDHAM ORIGINAL.

9. 1596 "WATLINGTON COLTES OR WATLINGTON TRUSBUTTES" ORIGINAL.

10. 1435-36 COURT ROLL
locate modern shelfmark and establish which Watlington manor it represents.

11. HMLR:
- current/historic parcel titles;
- filed deeds;
- relating franchises/manors index;
- any notices protecting manorial rights.

========================================================================
CP. PASS 6 — NEW URL / DOWNLOAD LEDGER
========================================================================

2025 Watlington Colts / Manorial Services catalogue:
https://www.manorialservices.com/uploads/1/0/1/4/101463086/manorial_services_lord_of_the_manor_winter_2025_vol_11b.pdf

Shouldham Sincks / Stow Estates, 2021:
https://shouldham-pc.gov.uk/2021/01/23/shouldham-sincks-change-of-access/

HMRC sporting-right rating guidance:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/rating-manual-section-6-part-3-valuation-of-all-property-classes/section-950-the-treatment-of-sporting-rights

HARE 3083/2 — 1611 bargain and sale:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/4a8a576e-85b9-42a6-8ea7-b99900bbbd93

HARE 3085 — 1628 deed to lead uses of recovery:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/297d3b1d-dad8-42d6-b050-1bcf5e0e2de1

HARE 6956/1-5 — c.1900 Hare/Hoff exchange maps:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/c587d73c-e321-4732-afc5-dce032497f69

Durham Record Office — Edleston Norfolk/manorial route:
https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=

Durham Record Office — Edleston Estate Papers / manors:
https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=N&ItemID=169656&ItemNum=100&Keyword=Congregational&PageNum=1&Variations=Y

========================================================================
CQ. PASS 6 — SUMMARY
========================================================================

1. The biggest present-rights result is procedural but decisive:
THE 2025 CATALOGUE DOES NOT PROVE WHAT RIGHTS WERE CONVEYED.

2. The catalogue expressly warns that historic rights need independent legal proof and
that a vendor can retain some/all rights, producing a title-only sale.

3. Therefore the actual modern contract/conveyance is now PRIORITY #1.

4. The 1435-36 Watlington court roll has been downgraded because its old inventory
context points toward a separate Ramsey Abbey Watlington stream.
It cannot safely prove Colts custom.

5. The 1512 Watlington Norfolk roll remains highly valuable but has not yet been
identified safely as Colts.

6. 1611 and 1628 NRO deeds prove that neighbouring manors remained separately named
legal property packages in the Riche/Buttes/Hare network.
This strengthens the rule against importing Gawsells/Priory/Shouldham Thorpe rights.

7. c.1900 HARE 6956/1-5 exposes a new pre-1926 land-exchange/severance target,
with related HARE 6374-5 now a priority.

8. Sporting rights remain the strongest substantive post-1926 lead:
Hare Estate retained and exercised them in the Sincks according to the official forest
plan; Shouldham Sincks was publicly identified as owned by Stow Estates in 2021.

9. This does NOT yet establish that those sporting rights are rights of the Watlington
Colts lordship.

10. The 1997 rating change did not itself extinguish sporting property rights; it changed
their rating treatment.

11. Edleston's Durham archive contains exactly the type of 1920s-40s manorial purchase /
extinguishment papers needed for this project, but no Watlington-specific online
catalogue hit was recovered in PASS 6.

12. The 1749 Watlington enclosure award, 1943 lease, modern conveyance, 1512 roll,
HARE 6374-5 and enfranchisement papers remain the documents most likely to change
the actual answer to "what rights exist today?"

========================================================================
CR. PASS 7 — ARCHIVAL PROOF UPGRADE
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 7 does not prove that any substantive historic right is exercisable today.

It does, however, upgrade four archival routes:

1. A surviving 1749 Watlington inclosure-award extract now has an exact Norfolk Record
Office shelfmark.

2. A previously missed HARE court book expressly includes a Watlyngton section for
1554-1558, during the working Colt ownership chronology.

3. The documents behind the c.1900 Hare/Hoff exchange maps now have exact file
references, dates, acreage and reciprocal conveyance parties.

4. The Durham Edleston catalogue route has been corrected: the exposed 1924-28
manorial-right purchase correspondence is for Mundford/Lynford, not Watlington.
A separate c.1930 inventory of Edleston's manors and advowsons is the better target.

These are catalogue-level discoveries. No image or transcription of the operative
documents was obtained in PASS 7.

========================================================================
CS. HARE 2454 — COURT BOOK INCLUDING WATLYNGTON, 1554-1558
========================================================================

RECORD:
Norfolk Record Office, HARE 2454

TITLE:
Court Book

DATE RANGE:
1528-1578

EXPOSED CATALOGUE SCOPE:
The official Norfolk Record Office search result describes the volume as containing
court material for several separately named manors and places, including:

- Shouldham cum membris, 1533-1543, 1555-1571 and 1575-1578;
- Kavenham, 1528-1544;
- Derssyngham, 1533-1542;
- Ayshewoode in Pentney, 1554-1571;
- Westbylney, 1554-1571;
- Ayleswythorpe, 1554-1571;
- Wyrmegeye, 1554-1558 and 1566; and
- Watlyngton, 1554-1558.

OFFICIAL DETAIL URL:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/court-book-419

OFFICIAL SEARCH URL USED TO EXPOSE THE RESULT:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/informationobject/browse?topLod=0&sort=relevance&query=Watlington+inclosure&repos=

ACCESS STATUS:
[Catalogue only]
No open scan or direct download was exposed.
The detail endpoint returned a temporary 502 response during PASS 7; the official NRO
search-result description was inspected.

IDENTITY ASSESSMENT:
[Inference]
The Watlyngton date range falls inside the working Colt ownership chronology established
elsewhere in this handover. That makes HARE 2454 a materially stronger Colts/custom
candidate than a generic, unproven Watlington court-roll reference.

However, the volume has not been read and its internal heading, named lord/steward,
tenant names, parcel names and descent into the HARE archive have not been checked.
It is therefore not yet safe to state that its Watlyngton folios are the court of
Watlington Colts/Coltes/Trussbutts.

SEPARATION RULE:
The same volume expressly includes "Shouldham cum membris" as a separately administered
entry. This strengthens the rule that customs or rights found in the Shouldham folios
must not be imported into the Watlyngton/Colts stream. Only the Watlyngton folios should
be used unless a specific entry legally connects the streams.

RIGHTS QUESTIONS TO TEST IN THE WATLYNGTON FOLIOS:

- whether the 16-shilling rent from the 1506 fine was still collected;
- whether the one free fold/foldage was exercised or recognised;
- court baron, homage, suit and jurisdiction;
- copyhold admissions, surrenders, fines, heriots and reliefs;
- commons, wastes, pasture, turbary, estovers or foldcourse;
- mills, fisheries, warren, hunting or other profits;
- pits, quarries, gravel, stone, clay or mineral custom;
- roads, ditches, drains, banks and tenant repair obligations;
- tenant and field names capable of linking the court to Colts Farm; and
- exact lord, steward and court style.

DOCUMENT-LEVEL CURRENT STATUS:
[High-priority catalogue lead; instrument unread]
HARE 2454 can test historic exercise and custom. It cannot itself prove present survival
without a later chain, statutory treatment and modern title evidence.

========================================================================
CT. 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE AWARD — SURVIVING EXTRACT LOCATED
========================================================================

RECORD:
Norfolk Record Office, MS 7245, 7B4

COLLECTION:
Norwich Public Library Manuscript Collection

TITLE:
Extract of Award under Watlington Inclosure Act. Allotment to Elizabeth Roberts.

DATE:
1749

LEVEL / PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION:
File; paper.

CATALOGUE STATUS:
Uncatalogued.

OFFICIAL URL:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/extract-of-award-under-watlington-inclosure-act-allotment-to-elizabeth-roberts

ACCESS STATUS:
[Catalogue only]
No open scan or direct download was exposed.

WHAT THIS PROVES:
[Verified at official archive-catalogue level]
At least one extract from the 1749 Watlington inclosure award survives in the NRO under
an exact shelfmark. The extract concerns an allotment to Elizabeth Roberts.

WHAT THIS DOES NOT YET PROVE:

- the acreage, boundaries or conditions of Roberts's allotment;
- whether Roberts held of Watlington Colts, another Watlington manor, or as freehold;
- the award's treatment of the 1506 free fold or 16-shilling rent;
- any lord's allotment in respect of soil of wastes;
- extinguishment or substitution of common/fold rights;
- minerals, pits, quarries or entry reservations;
- roads, private ways, public ways, drains, ditches or banks;
- allotments to named Colt/Trussbutts successors;
- the location of the full award, map or claims; or
- any present right.

STATUS CHANGE FROM PASS 6:
The statement "the 1749 award has not been found" is now too broad.
The safe statement is:

"A surviving 1749 award extract has been located as NRO MS 7245, 7B4; the full award,
map and claims have not yet been located or read."

NEXT ACTION:
Order a digital reproduction or transcription of MS 7245, 7B4, including every reverse,
endorsement, wrapper and any catalogue slip. Ask NRO staff whether the extract identifies
the custody, enrolment, commissioners or record from which it was copied, and whether
other Watlington award portions are filed nearby.

========================================================================
CU. HARE/HOFF EXCHANGE, 1899-1905 — OPERATIVE FILE REFERENCES RECOVERED
========================================================================

RECORD:
Norfolk Record Office, HARE 6374/1-4 and HARE 6375/1-72

TITLE:
Copy conveyance and other papers re exchange

DATE RANGE:
1899-1905

LEVEL / EXTENT:
File; two bundles.

PARTIES AND RECIPROCAL CONVEYANCES EXPOSED BY THE CATALOGUE:

- Thomas Leigh Hare conveyed to Henry Hoff 83 acres in South Runcton, Shouldham Thorpe
and Shouldham.

- Henry Hoff conveyed to Thomas Leigh Hare 106 acres in Shouldham Thorpe and Shouldham.

OFFICIAL URL:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/copy-conveyance-and-other-papers-re-exchange

RELATED MAPS ALREADY IDENTIFIED:
HARE 6956/1-5, c.1900 OS sheets marked for the Hare/Hoff exchange.

ACCESS STATUS:
[Catalogue only]
No open scan or direct download was exposed.

STATUS CHANGE FROM PASS 6:
HARE 6374-5 is no longer merely an inferred document group behind the maps. Exact
references, dates, bundle extent, parties, reciprocal acreages and places are now known.

WHAT REMAINS UNPROVED:

- whether any exchanged parcel was Colts Farm or held of the Colts manor;
- the field names, boundaries and title roots of the 83- and 106-acre blocks;
- whether lordship, minerals, sporting rights, timber, rents, commons or access were
reserved or conveyed;
- whether any rights were severed from the land before the 1925-26 statutory cut-off;
- whether the exchange fed into the 1943 Forestry Commission lease; and
- any present-day ownership or enforceability.

NEXT ACTION:
Obtain HARE 6374/1-4, HARE 6375/1-72 and HARE 6956/1-5 together. Abstract every operative
conveyance using:

date -> parties -> consideration -> parcels -> field names -> title/root -> tenures ->
express rights -> reservations/exceptions -> covenants -> plan colours -> successors.

Do not infer a Colts connection from geographic proximity alone.

========================================================================
CV. EDLESTON ARCHIVE — CORRECTION AND BETTER TARGET
========================================================================

OFFICIAL DURHAM RECORD OFFICE CATALOGUE URL:
https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=

PASS 6 CORRECTION:
PASS 6 described the D/HH 8 route too generally as a possible Watlington purchase file.
The exposed item-level catalogue now shows that:

- D/HH 8/2/52-83 consists of correspondence dated 27 October 1924 to 20 January 1928
between R.H. Edleston, E.R. Hanby Holmes, W.R. Greenland and W.J./J.G. Taylor about
Edleston's purchase of manorial rights/manorial matters; but

- the catalogue scope is the Norfolk manors of Mundford/Lynford, not Watlington.

Those papers may explain Edleston's general purchase method, but they are not direct
evidence of a Watlington purchase and must not be cited as one.

BETTER DIRECT TARGET:
Durham Record Office, D/HH 8/2/86

CATALOGUE TITLE:
Details of R.H. Edleston, his manors, advowsons etc.

DATE / EXTENT:
n.d. [c.1930]; one paper; typescript.

SIGNIFICANCE:
[Inference]
The approximate date is close to the alleged 1929 acquisition of the Watlington title.
If the typescript lists Watlington, its exact style and any associated advowson, it could
be near-contemporary evidence that the title entered Edleston's holdings. If Watlington
is absent, that absence would be informative but not conclusive unless the list declares
itself complete.

CURRENT STATUS:
[Catalogue only; content unread]
No open image or direct download was exposed.

NEXT ACTION:
Order D/HH 8/2/86 first. Ask Durham Record Office to search specifically for:

- Watlington / Watlyngton;
- Colt / Colts / Coltes;
- Trussbut / Trussbutts / Trusbuttes;
- Hare;
- 1929; and
- any acquisition schedule, receipt, conveyance, abstract, sales particulars or
correspondence outside D/HH 8/2/52-83.

========================================================================
CW. PASS 7 — OFFICIAL 1749 ACT / PARLIAMENTARY CORROBORATION
========================================================================

LEGISLATION.GOV.UK CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/changes/chron-tables/private/12

The official chronological table exposes the Watlington (Norfolk) inclosure entry in the
1749 private-Act sequence. This corroborates the Act's existence. It does not supply the
award or prove how any right was treated.

HOUSE OF LORDS JOURNAL:
https://www.british-history.ac.uk/lords-jrnl/vol27/pp313-319

The printed journal page records the Watlington Common bill proceeding under the title
beginning "An Act for enclosing and dividing certain Commons and Wastes...". This is
parliamentary-procedure evidence, not the operative allotment award.

CHAPTER CAUTION:
The working chapter reference elsewhere in this handover remains 22 Geo. II, private
c.37, royal assent 26 May 1749. The chronological-table snippet seen in PASS 7 was
adjacent to another numbered entry and must not be used by itself to alter that citation.

========================================================================
CX. PASS 7 — RIGHTS-SURVIVAL EFFECT
========================================================================

LORDSHIP:
No status change. A lordship may exist separately, but the operative modern conveyance
remains necessary to establish what was actually conveyed.

16-SHILLING RENT:
Still proved only as a historic 1506 component. HARE 2454 is now the best newly identified
mid-16th-century test for actual collection or recognition. No present rent is proved.

ONE FREE FOLD / FOLDAGE:
Still directly proved in 1506. HARE 2454 can test continued exercise before enclosure;
MS 7245, 7B4 can begin testing the 1749 transformation. No modern fold right is proved.

COURT, COPYHOLD, HERIOTS, FINES AND CUSTOM:
HARE 2454 is the strongest new record candidate because it expressly includes Watlyngton,
1554-1558, within the relevant ownership chronology. Its Colts identity and contents are
not yet proved.

COMMONS AND WASTES:
The transformation document is now partly located. The award extract proves archival
survival of at least one allotment extract, not its substance. Present rights remain
unknown.

ROADS, WAYS, DRAINS, DYKES AND BANKS:
MS 7245, 7B4 and HARE 2454 are now exact targets. No Colts-specific benefit or liability
has been established.

MINERALS, PITS, QUARRIES AND ENTRY:
No direct mineral reservation or mineral custom has been found. The court book, award
extract, exchange conveyances and modern titles are the correct successive tests.

SPORTING RIGHTS:
No new direct Colts sporting-right evidence was found. HARE 6374/6375 is relevant only
as a possible 1899-1905 reservation/severance point. The 1943 lease remains essential.

ADVOWSON:
No new conveyance evidence was found. D/HH 8/2/86 may show how Edleston described his
advowsons c.1930, but the modern Patronage (Benefices) Measure analysis remains unchanged.

WARRANTED CONCLUSION AFTER PASS 7:

"Historic rights and incidents are proved for Watlington in earlier instruments, but no
substantive manorial, mineral, sporting, fold, rent, common, court or access right is yet
proved to have passed in the modern Watlington Colts sale or to be presently exercisable."

========================================================================
CY. PASS 7 — REVISED DECISIVE DOCUMENT ORDER
========================================================================

1. MODERN WATLINGTON COLTS SALE CONTRACT / CONVEYANCE
including schedules, reservations, title documents and seller's epitome.

2. HARE 2454
obtain the Watlyngton 1554-1558 folios and prove the exact court identity.

3. NRO MS 7245, 7B4
obtain the 1749 award extract and use its headings/endorsements to trace the full
award, map and claims.

4. 1512 OXFORDSHIRE HISTORY CENTRE GB 160 SL26/6
full images/transcription and provenance.

5. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON NORFOLK INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP + CLAIMS
still not located.

6. ACTUAL 1943 HARE ESTATE -> FORESTRY COMMISSION LEASE + PLAN.

7. HARE 6374/1-4, HARE 6375/1-72 AND HARE 6956/1-5
abstract the c.1900 exchange and reservations parcel by parcel.

8. DURHAM D/HH 8/2/86
c.1930 list of R.H. Edleston's manors and advowsons, followed by a targeted Watlington
search outside the Mundford/Lynford correspondence group.

9. MAF 13 / MAF 27
compensation and enfranchisement records.

10. 1587 GEORGE COLT -> THOMAS SHOULDHAM ORIGINAL.

11. 1596 "WATLINGTON COLTES OR WATLINGTON TRUSBUTTES" ORIGINAL.

12. 1435-36 COURT ROLL
locate modern shelfmark and establish which Watlington manor it represents.

13. HMLR:
- current/historic parcel titles;
- filed deeds;
- relating franchises/manors index; and
- any notices protecting manorial rights.

========================================================================
CZ. PASS 7 — NEW EXACT URL / ACCESS LEDGER
========================================================================

HARE 2454 — court book including Watlyngton, 1554-1558:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/court-book-419
Access: catalogue only; no direct download exposed.

NRO exact search result used to expose the HARE 2454 and 1749 leads:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/informationobject/browse?topLod=0&sort=relevance&query=Watlington+inclosure&repos=
Access: HTML search result.

MS 7245, 7B4 — 1749 award extract, Elizabeth Roberts allotment:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/extract-of-award-under-watlington-inclosure-act-allotment-to-elizabeth-roberts
Access: catalogue only; no direct download exposed.

HARE 6374/1-4 and HARE 6375/1-72 — Hare/Hoff exchange papers:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/copy-conveyance-and-other-papers-re-exchange
Access: catalogue only; no direct download exposed.

Durham D/HH 8 catalogue page containing D/HH 8/2/86:
https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=
Access: catalogue only; no direct download exposed.

Legislation.gov.uk private-Act chronological table:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/changes/chron-tables/private/12
Access: official HTML/XHTML; no award download.

House of Lords Journal, volume 27, pages 313-319:
https://www.british-history.ac.uk/lords-jrnl/vol27/pp313-319
Access: HTML edition of parliamentary journal; not the award.

========================================================================
DA. PASS 7 — SEARCH NEGATIVES / NO FALSE CLOSURE
========================================================================

PASS 7 did not recover:

- the full 1749 award, map or claims;
- an image/transcription of MS 7245, 7B4;
- an image/transcription of the HARE 2454 Watlyngton folios;
- the actual 1943 Hare Estate/Forestry Commission lease;
- a 1929 Watlington conveyance to R.H. Edleston;
- the original 1596 Watlington Coltes/Trussbuttes instrument;
- images of the 1512 OHC roll;
- the operative modern Watlington Colts sale conveyance; or
- current registered-title evidence for any parcel or protected manorial right.

These negatives describe this pass only. They are not proof that the documents never
existed or do not survive offline.

========================================================================
DB. PASS 7 — CUMULATIVE SUMMARY
========================================================================

1. The present-rights answer is unchanged: historic existence does not prove modern
conveyance or exercisability.

2. HARE 2454 is now the strongest identified mid-16th-century court/custom target because
it expressly includes Watlyngton, 1554-1558. Its exact Colts identity is still unproved.

3. At least one 1749 award extract survives as NRO MS 7245, 7B4. The full award, map and
claims remain missing.

4. HARE 6374/1-4 and HARE 6375/1-72 are the exact two-bundle Hare/Hoff exchange file,
1899-1905. The catalogue reveals reciprocal 83- and 106-acre conveyances, but no Colts
parcel or rights reservation has yet been proved.

5. The D/HH 8/2/52-83 Edleston correspondence is Mundford/Lynford material and must not
be presented as a Watlington purchase file.

6. D/HH 8/2/86, a c.1930 typescript listing Edleston's manors and advowsons, is the better
immediate Edleston target.

7. The separation discipline is reinforced: HARE 2454's own scope lists Shouldham cum
membris separately from Watlyngton. Only record-specific links can carry a right from
one stream into the other.

8. The three most efficient next orders are the modern conveyance, the Watlyngton folios
in HARE 2454, and MS 7245, 7B4.

========================================================================
DC. PASS 8 — OFFICIAL MANORIAL DOCUMENTS REGISTER BREAKTHROUGH
========================================================================

The National Archives' official Manorial Documents Register (MDR) returns one record-
creator result styled WATLINGTON MANOR, Norfolk, covering 1189-1925. The result identifies
five surviving record groups held by two archives:

1. NRO HARE 4056
1300-1399: custumal (14th century).

2. NRO HARE 4058
1411-1412: rent collector's accounts, with Shouldham Thorpe.

3. Northamptonshire Archives Service F(M) roll 160
1452-1453: court roll, with other manors.

4. NRO HARE 2454
1554-1558: court book, with other manors.

5. NRO BL/MA 34
1746-1767: draft court book.

OFFICIAL MDR RESULT:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/c/F240215

REPRODUCIBLE MDR SEARCH:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/results/c?_q=Watlington&_sf=text_man&_tn=Watlington&_ocn=Norfolk&_naet=M&_st=mdrc

Access: official catalogue HTML. The MDR supplies references and holding archives; it
does not supply images of the records.

This is a major archival advance because it replaces isolated catalogue hits with a
dated court/custom/rent sequence. It is not, however, proof that all five records concern
one legally identical manor. The register uses the undifferentiated creator name
"Watlington Manor" in a parish known to contain multiple manorial streams. Each record
must still be identified internally by court heading, lord, steward, tenants, parcels and
appurtenances before it is assigned to Colts/Coltes/Trussbutts.

========================================================================
DD. HARE 4056 — FOURTEENTH-CENTURY CUSTUMAL, HIGH VALUE / HIGH IDENTITY RISK
========================================================================

The Norfolk Record Office catalogue gives:

Reference: HARE 4056, 210X5
Title: "? Watlington, ? Wimbotsham; Custumal - Native tenants"
Date: n.d. [14th century]
Scope: "Top part illegible."
Hierarchy: Hare of Stow Bardolph Collection -> Manorial and Estate Records and Title
Deeds relating to Hare Estate -> Watlington

CATALOGUE:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/watlington-wimbotsham-custumal-native-tenants

MDR ITEM ROUTE:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/N14362168

Access: catalogue only; no direct scan/download exposed.

WHY IT MATTERS:

A custumal is the correct record type to identify tenant rents, services, fold/customary
obligations, commons, court incidents and the lord's local profits. It could provide the
earliest structured answer to what the Watlington tenants owed and used.

WHY IT CANNOT YET BE CALLED COLTS:

- the official title itself places question marks before Watlington and Wimbotsham;
- the top is catalogued as illegible;
- Wimbotsham is a place access point; and
- no lord, manor style or parcel has been transcribed.

Accordingly HARE 4056 is a first-order inspection target, not substantive proof of a
Colts right.

========================================================================
DE. HARE 4058 — WATLYNGTON/SHULDHAM RENT ACCOUNT, 1411-1412
========================================================================

The Norfolk Record Office catalogue gives:

Reference: HARE 4058, 210X5
Title: "Watlyngton and Shuldham; Account of collector of rents"
Date: 1411-1412
Scope: Michaelmas 13-14 Henry IV
Hierarchy: Hare of Stow Bardolph Collection -> Manorial and Estate Records and Title
Deeds relating to Hare Estate -> Watlington

CATALOGUE:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/watlyngton-and-shuldham-account-of-collector-of-rents

MDR ITEM ROUTE:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/N14372362

Access: catalogue only; no direct scan/download exposed.

This account can test the rent roll, arrears, named tenants, parcels and administrative
relationship between Watlyngton and Shuldham before the documented Colt succession.
But the combined place-title does not prove that the two were one manor or that a
Shuldham entry was appurtenant to Colts. Entries must be segregated by place and heading.

HARE 4058 is particularly useful for the 16s rent question: it may reveal the rent
structure inherited by later holders, but it cannot prove that the exact 1506 16s rent
already existed or survived unless the account expressly identifies it.

========================================================================
DF. F(M) ROLL 160 — 1452-1453 COURT ROLL, THE NEW TRANSITION-ERA PRIORITY
========================================================================

The MDR identifies:

Reference: F(M) roll 160
Description: court roll, with other manors
Date: 1452-1453
Held by: Northamptonshire Archives Service, not available at The National Archives
NRA catalogue reference: NRA 5870 Wentworth

OFFICIAL ITEM PAGE:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/N14259432

NORTHAMPTONSHIRE ARCHIVES ONLINE CATALOGUE:
https://nro-apw.adlibhosting.com/home

Access: official catalogue only; no image/download exposed. An item-level result was not
located in the Northamptonshire online catalogue during this pass; the TNA MDR item page
is the exact public reference route.

The date makes this the best newly identified transition-era court target. It follows
Thomas Trussbut's reported death in 1451 and therefore may show the manor style, lord,
succession, tenants, rents and customs at precisely the Trussbut-to-heir stage.

That chronological fit is evidence of priority, not identity. The catalogue says only
"court roll, with other manors" and uses generic Watlington creator metadata. The roll's
heading and internal entries must prove that it is the manor later called Colts/Coltes/
Trussbutts.

========================================================================
DG. HARE 2454 — PASS 7 PRIORITY CORRECTED / DOWNGRADED
========================================================================

PASS 7 described HARE 2454 as the strongest new Colts court-custom candidate because its
Watlyngton folios fall in 1554-1558, inside the Colt-period chronology.

PASS 8 supersedes that assessment.

The official MDR and NRO authority metadata place HARE 2454 under an undifferentiated
"Watlington Manor" creator, the same generic record-creator framework used for the later
Davis-era draft court book. That does not prove HARE 2454 is Gawsells and it does not
exclude Colts. It does prove that chronology and the word Watlyngton alone are
insufficient to select the Colts stream.

Revised status:

HARE 2454 remains a valuable 1554-1558 Watlyngton court book, but it is now one of several
identity-unresolved Watlington court/custom sources. It must not be described as the
strongest Colts record until its court heading, lord, steward, tenants, parcels and
appurtenances are read.

CATALOGUE:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/court-book-419

MDR ITEM ROUTE:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/N14349866

Access: catalogue only; no direct scan/download exposed.

========================================================================
DH. BL/MA 34 AND BL/CS 4/57 — ENCLOSURE-ERA COURT/CUSTODY STREAM
========================================================================

BL/MA 34
--------

Reference: BL/MA 34
Title: Draft court books of Tottenhill, 1746-1778, and Watlington, 1746-1767
[in handwriting of Philip Case]
Extent: one volume
Former reference: BL IXd/1

CATALOGUE:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/draft-court-books-of-tottenhill-1746-1778-and-watlington-1746-1767-in-handwriting-of-philip-case

MDR ITEM ROUTE:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/N14374985

Access: catalogue only; no direct scan/download exposed.

The Watlington section directly brackets the 1749 enclosure. It is therefore capable of
showing whether courts, admissions, rents, fines, customs, commons or fold-related entries
continued or changed immediately before and after enclosure.

The NRO authority history states that John Davis was lord of Watlington manor in the
mid-eighteenth century and identifies him in BL/MA 34 with Tottenhill. This makes BL/MA 34
a strong enclosure-era comparator, but not a Colts source without an internal Colts style
or a deed consolidating the streams.

BL/CS 4/57
----------

Reference: BL/CS 4/57
Date: 10 August 1779
Title: Mr Plestow, Watlington Hall, to Philip Case: asks for court books of manors of
Watlington and Tottenhill as he declines the stewardship, with list of court books
receipted by Henry Bell.

CATALOGUE:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/mr-plestow-watlington-hall-to-philip-case-asks-for-court-books-of-manors-of-watlington-and-tottenhill-as-he-declines-the-stewardship-with-list-of-court-books-receipted-by-henry-bell-10-aug-1779

Access: catalogue only; no direct scan/download exposed.

The attached 1779 list may identify the then-surviving court-book run, its dates and
custody transition. It should be ordered together with BL/MA 34. It may also reveal
whether any separately styled Colts court book was among the records handed over.

========================================================================
DI. DAVIS / PLESTOW / COOTE — GAWSELLS SEPARATION CORRECTION
========================================================================

The archive catalogue's generic "Watlington Manor" name must be read against contemporary
directory evidence:

- William White's 1845 directory says Charles Berners Plestow of Watlington Hall was
"lord of the manor of Gawsels, in Watlington", for which courts leet and baron were
held yearly.

- William White's 1883 directory says G. Coote of Sudbury was "lord of the manor of
Gawsels in Watlington", likewise with annual courts leet and baron.

1845 TRANSCRIPTION:
https://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/NFK/Watlington/White1845

1883 TRANSCRIPTION:
https://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/NFK/Watlington/White1883

NRO GENERIC WATLINGTON MANOR AUTHORITY RECORD:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/watlington-manor-1189-1925-watlington-norfolk

The warranted conclusion is narrow but important:

1. Plestow and Coote are positively identified in contemporary published directories as
lords of Gawsells in Watlington.

2. The Davis/Plestow court-book and stewardship stream joined to Tottenhill is therefore
most safely treated as a Gawsells/Tottenhill stream unless an operative instrument
expressly names Colts or combines the manors.

3. This does not prove that Plestow or Coote never also acquired Colts. It does mean the
auction-catalogue assertion that Plestow and then Coote held Colts is not independently
established by the generic "Watlington Manor" court records or directory entries.

4. No right, court custom or enclosure outcome from BL/MA 34 may be imported into Colts
merely because the same family or hall appears in the later narrative.

This is the most important separation correction in PASS 8.

========================================================================
DJ. REPORTED 1581 LEASE — NEW LEAD, SOURCE NOT EXPOSED
========================================================================

The 2025 Manorial Services catalogue additionally states that Watlington Colts was first
leased out in 1581 before the reported 1596 sale to Thomas Shouldham.

CATALOGUE PDF:
https://www.manorialservices.com/uploads/1/0/1/4/101463086/manorial_services_lord_of_the_manor_winter_2025_vol_11b.pdf

The catalogue does not identify the 1581 lease's repository, reference, parties, term,
parcels, reservations or rights. No matching NRO catalogue result was recovered in this
pass. The 1581 statement is therefore a secondary source-finding lead only.

If found, the lease could be decisive because reservations to the Colt lessor may reveal
which lordship profits, courts, rents, fold, commons, minerals, timber, sporting or entry
rights were kept separate from occupation of the land seven years before the 1587/1596
transfer sequence.

========================================================================
DK. PASS 8 — RIGHTS-SURVIVAL EFFECT
========================================================================

PASS 8 identifies more evidence capable of proving historic local custom. It does not
prove a present exercisable Watlington Colts right.

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 8 EFFECT
------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------
16s rent HARE 4058 and F(M) roll 160 can test the earlier
rent structure; no exact 16s entry is yet read.

One free fold HARE 4056 and the court rolls could explain the
local fold custom; no Colts identity or survival is
yet proved.

Court baron / customary court A five-record Watlington sequence now exists, but
every item has a manor-identity problem.

Heriots / fines / admissions Now testable in HARE 4056, F(M) roll 160, HARE 2454
and BL/MA 34; none can be attributed to Colts yet.

Commons / wastes BL/MA 34 brackets enclosure and MS 7245, 7B4 proves
one award extract survives. The full award and the
Colts-tenure connection remain missing.

Minerals / pits / entry No direct clause or custom recovered. The custumal
and court books are evidentiary targets only.

Sporting / timber / access No new Colts-specific reservation. Wider Hare estate
evidence remains separate unless the title chain joins it.

Lordship / title chain Plestow and Coote are positively evidenced as Gawsells
lords. Their Colts ownership remains unproved without
an express Colts conveyance or contemporaneous list.

CURRENT WARRANTED ANSWER:

- Historic Watlington rights and court activity plainly existed.
- The 1506 bundle remains the direct historic Colts working baseline.
- No newly catalogued custumal, rent account or court book is yet internally identified
as the same legal manor as the 1506 Colts working bundle.
- No present mineral, sporting, common, fold, rent, market, access or other substantive
right is proved by PASS 8.
- The operative modern conveyance and registered-title evidence remain indispensable.

========================================================================
DL. PASS 8 — REVISED DECISIVE DOCUMENT ORDER
========================================================================

1. ACTUAL MODERN WATLINGTON COLTS CONVEYANCE / SALE CONTRACT
schedules, reservations, title/epitome and seller's root of title.

2. NORTHAMPTONSHIRE ARCHIVES F(M) ROLL 160
1452-1453 transition-era court roll; obtain complete images and identify court heading,
lord, steward, tenants, parcels and other manors in the roll.

3. NRO HARE 4056
fourteenth-century custumal; obtain complete images, including all surviving headings.

4. NRO HARE 4058
1411-1412 Watlyngton/Shuldham rent account; segregate entries and identify rents.

5. NRO HARE 2454
obtain the 1554-1558 Watlyngton folios and prove the exact manor identity. This remains
essential but is no longer privileged by chronology alone.

6. NRO BL/MA 34 + BL/CS 4/57
abstract the 1746-1767 Watlington court section and the 1779 court-book custody list;
test expressly for Colts, Gawsells, Davis, Plestow and Tottenhill styles.

7. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP + CLAIMS
order MS 7245, 7B4 simultaneously and trace its parent award/custody.

8. EXACT 1581 LEASE
require original/office-copy reference and abstract all reservations and appurtenances.

9. DURHAM D/HH 8/2/86
c.1930 Edleston list of manors and advowsons.

10. HARE 6374/1-4, HARE 6375/1-72 AND HARE 6956/1-5
abstract c.1900 exchange parcels and reservations.

11. 1512 OXFORDSHIRE HISTORY CENTRE GB 160 SL26/6
full images/transcription and provenance.

12. 1596 "WATLINGTON COLTES OR WATLINGTON TRUSBUTTES" ORIGINAL
with preceding 1587 transfer and later Gawdy/Rich/Hare assurances.

13. HMLR
current/historic parcel titles, filed deeds, manor/franchise index and notices.

========================================================================
DM. PASS 8 — NEW EXACT URL / ACCESS LEDGER
========================================================================

Official MDR Watlington Manor record set:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/c/F240215
Access: official catalogue HTML; five collections, two archives; no record images.

HARE 4056 custumal:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/watlington-wimbotsham-custumal-native-tenants
Access: catalogue only; no direct scan/download exposed.

HARE 4058 rent collector's account:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/watlyngton-and-shuldham-account-of-collector-of-rents
Access: catalogue only; no direct scan/download exposed.

F(M) roll 160 court roll:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/N14259432
Access: official TNA MDR item page; held by Northamptonshire Archives; no download.

Northamptonshire Archives online catalogue:
https://nro-apw.adlibhosting.com/home
Access: online catalogue search; no F(M) roll 160 item result located in PASS 8.

HARE 2454 MDR item route:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/N14349866
Access: official catalogue route; no record image.

BL/MA 34 draft court books:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/draft-court-books-of-tottenhill-1746-1778-and-watlington-1746-1767-in-handwriting-of-philip-case
Access: catalogue only; no direct scan/download exposed.

BL/CS 4/57 1779 stewardship/court-book list:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/mr-plestow-watlington-hall-to-philip-case-asks-for-court-books-of-manors-of-watlington-and-tottenhill-as-he-declines-the-stewardship-with-list-of-court-books-receipted-by-henry-bell-10-aug-1779
Access: catalogue only; no direct scan/download exposed.

NRO Watlington Manor authority record:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/watlington-manor-1189-1925-watlington-norfolk
Access: official authority metadata; not a deed or record image.

White's 1845 Watlington directory transcription:
https://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/NFK/Watlington/White1845
Access: HTML transcription; says Plestow was lord of Gawsels.

White's 1883 Watlington directory transcription:
https://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/NFK/Watlington/White1883
Access: HTML transcription; says Coote was lord of Gawsels.

========================================================================
DN. PASS 8 — SEARCH NEGATIVES / NO FALSE CLOSURE
========================================================================

PASS 8 did not recover:

- images or transcriptions of HARE 4056, HARE 4058, F(M) roll 160, HARE 2454,
BL/MA 34 or BL/CS 4/57;
- an item-level Northamptonshire online-catalogue page beyond the exact TNA MDR route for
F(M) roll 160;
- the reported 1581 Watlington Colts lease or a repository reference for it;
- a deed expressly transferring Colts to Plestow or Coote;
- the full 1749 award, map or claims;
- the 1929 Edleston acquisition deed;
- the operative modern sale conveyance; or
- current registered-title evidence for a protected manorial right.

These negatives describe public recovery in this pass only. They do not prove that an
offline or uncatalogued document does not survive.

========================================================================
DO. PASS 8 — CUMULATIVE SUMMARY
========================================================================

1. The official MDR now identifies five Watlington record groups from the fourteenth to
eighteenth centuries: a custumal, a rent account and three court-record series.

2. F(M) roll 160 (1452-1453) is the highest new transition-era priority because it falls
immediately after Thomas Trussbut's reported death, but exact Colts identity remains
unproved.

3. HARE 4056 is potentially the best source for medieval local custom, yet its title is
expressly uncertain and its top is illegible.

4. HARE 4058 can test the early rent structure, but its Watlyngton/Shuldham combination
must be disaggregated entry by entry.

5. PASS 7's description of HARE 2454 as the strongest Colts court candidate is corrected.
It remains valuable; chronology and generic Watlyngton metadata do not establish the
particular manor.

6. BL/MA 34 brackets the 1749 enclosure and BL/CS 4/57 may list the surviving court-book
run in 1779. Both belong to a Davis/Plestow/Tottenhill administrative context and may
not be imported into Colts without express identity evidence.

7. Contemporary directories identify Plestow in 1845 and Coote in 1883 as lords of
Gawsells, not as Colts lords. This does not disprove additional Colts ownership; it
exposes the missing conveyance that must prove it.

8. The reported 1581 lease is now a defined source-finding target, not established fact.

9. No present exercisable Watlington Colts right is proved. The modern conveyance,
registered-title evidence and record-specific manor identity remain decisive.

END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
========================================================================
DP. PASS 9 — CONTINUITY / SCOPE
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 9 continues from PASS 8 without discarding any earlier source, caution, negative
search result, archival target or rights-survival assessment.

This pass concentrated on:
- resolving who the post-1570s Colt owner actually was before the reported 1581/1587/1596
Watlington Colts transactions;
- testing whether the nineteenth-century Watlington advowson/patronage still travelled
with a manorial title;
- checking whether the 1943 Hare Estate / Forestry leasehold structure remains visible
in current official Forestry England material;
- re-running the unresolved 1581/1596, 1749, 1634, 1943 and 1929 document searches
without treating search-result absence as proof of non-existence.

No present exercisable substantive right of Watlington Colts is established by this pass.

========================================================================
DQ. COLT SELLER GENERATION — MATERIAL CORRECTION TO THE 2025 NARRATIVE
========================================================================

The 2025 Manorial Services / Feudal Titles narrative says, in substance, that the
George Colt who died in the later sixteenth century was followed by "George's son,
Sir George Colt", and that this later man was the last Colt lord before the reported
1581 lease / 1596 sale.

SOURCE:
https://feudaltitles.com/titles-index-u-z

PASS 9 has located an OFFICIAL ARCHIVE CATALOGUE DESCRIPTION which materially corrects
that genealogy.

ESSEX ARCHIVES ONLINE:
Reference D/P 214/25/11

URL:
https://www.essexarchivesonline.co.uk/Result_Details.aspx?DocID=45844

The catalogue describes a 25 January 1601/2 feoffment and identifies:

GEORGE COLT OF CAVENDISH, SUFFOLK, ESQUIRE

as:
- cousin and heir of Sir George Colt deceased; with the catalogue's explanatory
parenthesis stating that he was
- son and heir of HENRY COLT,
- who was son and heir of the said SIR GEORGE COLT.

The same entry names HENRY COLT as son and heir of this younger George Colt.

STATUS:
[Verified at official archive-catalogue level]

WHAT THIS PROVES:
1. A later George Colt of Cavendish existed after the elder Sir George Colt.
2. The later George was in the HENRY -> GEORGE generation, i.e. a GRANDSON in the
direct line from the elder Sir George, not simply "George's son" as stated by the
2025 narrative.
3. The archive styles the later George "esquire" in the 1601/2 record.
4. The 2025 title-history wording therefore contains a material generational
compression/error at exactly the point where the alleged Watlington Colts alienation
occurs.

INDEPENDENT CONTEXT:
Historic England states that Colt's manor / Trussbutt's was sold in 1587 by
"George Colt" to Thomas Shouldham.

URL:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446

[Inference]
The chronologically appropriate "George Colt" for a 1587 sale is now much more likely
to be the younger George of Cavendish identified by Essex Archives Online, rather than
the elder Sir George represented by the auction narrative.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
The Essex archive record is NOT the Watlington conveyance.
It does NOT by itself prove that the younger George executed:
- the reported 1581 lease;
- the Historic England 1587 sale; or
- the reported 1596 conveyance.

The actual operative Watlington instrument remains mandatory.

REVISED WORKING SELLER DESCRIPTION:
For source-searching, use:
"George Colt of Cavendish, esquire, son/heir of Henry Colt and grandson/heir in the
line of Sir George Colt"

alongside spelling variants:
Colt / Colte / Coult / Cowlte.

Do NOT hard-code "Sir George Colt, son of George" into the Watlington title chain.

========================================================================
DR. ADVOWSON / PATRONAGE — NINETEENTH-CENTURY SEVERANCE IS NOW VISIBLE
========================================================================

The 1506 final concord directly includes:
"the advowson of the church of St Peter of Watlyngton"

CP 25/1/170/197 no.106:
https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_170_197.shtml

The missing issue has been whether the patronage continued to travel with a later
Watlington manor and, if so, which manor.

PASS 9 adds a useful nineteenth-century comparison.

1845:
William White's directory identifies CHARLES BERNERS PLESTOW as:
- lord of the manor of GAWSELS in Watlington; and
- the person in whose gift the Watlington rectory then stood.

URL:
https://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/NFK/Watlington/White1845

1870-72:
The Imperial Gazetteer description reproduced by A Vision of Britain identifies
G. BARKER, ESQ. as patron of the Watlington living.

URL:
https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/place/6039

1883:
White's directory identifies:
- G. COOTE, ESQ. as lord of the manor of GAWSELS in Watlington; but
- GILBERT BARKER, ESQ. as patron of the Watlington rectory.

URL:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1883.shtml

Historic England independently reproduces the 1845 statement that the rectory was in
C.B. Plestow's gift:

https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1464092

STATUS:
[Verified at contemporary-directory / historical-gazetteer transcription level, with
official Historic England corroboration for the 1845 position]

SIGNIFICANCE:
1. In 1845 Plestow simultaneously held the named Gawsells lordship and the church
patronage.
2. By 1870-72 the patron was G. Barker.
3. By 1883 Coote held the named Gawsells lordship while Gilbert Barker held the
patronage.
4. The Watlington parish patronage therefore had become separately owned from the
Gawsells lordship by this period.

CRITICAL COLTS LIMIT:
This does NOT prove that the 1845 patronage was the same proprietary advowson conveyed
with the 1506 Watlyngton manor, because the 1506 manor-to-later-manor identity chain
remains unresolved.

However, it does prove an important structural point:
LATE MANORIAL TITLE OWNERSHIP IN WATLINGTON DID NOT NECESSARILY CARRY THE PARISH
PATRONAGE WITH IT.

RIGHTS-SURVIVAL EFFECT:
The advowson must be traced as its own incorporeal title stream.
It must not be represented as a privilege automatically following the current lordship.

NEW DOCUMENT TARGET:
Find the deed, sale, settlement, presentation record or other instrument by which
Plestow-family patronage passed to Barker, apparently between the 1845 directory
position and the 1870-72 Gazetteer position.

========================================================================
DS. SHOULDHAM FORESTRY — CURRENT OFFICIAL LEASEHOLD STATUS
========================================================================

The previously identified official Forestry England plan states that Forestry Commission
management began in 1943 under a 999-year lease from the Hare Estate and that sporting
rights were retained by the estate.

DIRECT PLAN:
https://www.forestryengland.uk/sites/default/files/documents/ShouldhamandBilneyForestPlan2016-2026_0.pdf

PASS 9 adds the CURRENT OFFICIAL FORESTRY ENGLAND WEBPAGE:

https://www.forestryengland.uk/forest-planning/shouldham-and-bilney-forest-plan

The current page distinguishes:
- West Bilney as FREEHOLD; and
- Shouldham as LEASEHOLD land on which permissive access is granted by the landowner.

STATUS:
[Verified from current Forestry England webpage]

SIGNIFICANCE:
This is consistent with the long leasehold structure described in the historic forest
plan and shows that Forestry England still treats Shouldham as leasehold rather than
freehold land.

CRITICAL LIMITS:
It does NOT prove:
- that the original 1943 lease has never been varied, assigned, supplemented or partly
surrendered;
- the present identity of the sporting-right owner;
- that every original 1943 reservation still subsists unchanged;
- that any sporting right is appurtenant to Watlington Colts.

The actual 1943 lease, plan and any supplemental/variation deeds remain decisive.

========================================================================
DT. D/HH 8/2/86 — TARGET RECONFIRMED, CONTENT STILL UNREAD
========================================================================

PASS 9 rechecked the Durham Hanby Holmes / Edleston catalogue structure.

D/HH 8/2/86 remains:
"Details of R.H. Edleston, his manors, advowsons etc."
n.d. [c.1930]
one paper
typescript.

CATALOGUE:
https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=

Its neighbouring D/HH 8/2 manorial papers do NOT create a Watlington purchase proof:
the large earlier run is principally the Mundford/Lynford material already separated in
PASS 7.

STATUS:
[Catalogue only; D/HH 8/2/86 content not exposed online]

The order request remains:
- D/HH 8/2/86 first;
- then a targeted search for Watlington / Colts / Coltes / Trussbutts / Trusbuttes /
Hare / Humphreys / 1929 and any conveyance, receipt, sales particulars or schedule.

========================================================================
DU. PASS 9 — SEARCH NEGATIVES / NO FALSE CLOSURE
========================================================================

The web/archive re-search in PASS 9 did NOT recover:

1. The reported 1581 Watlington Colts lease.
2. The original 1587 George Colt -> Thomas Shouldham conveyance.
3. The original reported 1596 conveyance using the style
"Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes".
4. The complete 1749 Watlington, Norfolk inclosure award, map and claims.
5. The exact archive reference / full text of the 1634 Shouldham Warren lease.
6. The actual 1943 Hare Estate -> Forestry Commission 999-year lease.
7. The alleged 1929 Mary Humphreys -> R.H. Edleston Watlington Colts conveyance.
8. A deed proving that Plestow -> Coote in/around 1869 included Watlington Colts rather
than only Gawsells / another estate interest.

These remain UNRESOLVED, not disproved.

========================================================================
DV. PASS 9 — RIGHTS-SURVIVAL EFFECT
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 9 EFFECT
------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------

Lordship / title chain Seller-generation correction materially improves
the 1587/1596 search target. Actual conveyance absent.

One free fold No new operative continuation/extinction evidence.
1749 award + court/custom records remain decisive.

16s rent No new continuation evidence.

St Peter advowson/patronage Important structural upgrade: patronage demonstrably
separated from the named Gawsells lordship by the
1870s/1880s. Colts identity chain still unproved.

Court/custom No new court roll text recovered.

Mines/minerals No new direct Colts reservation.

Sporting rights Current Forestry England still describes Shouldham
as leasehold. This supports continuing leasehold
structure but does not identify current sporting owner
or connect the right to Colts.

Warren No 1634 original recovered.

Market/fair No new Colts ownership evidence.

Commons/waste No full 1749 award recovered.

Present exercisable right NONE newly proved by PASS 9.

========================================================================
DW. PASS 9 — REVISED DECISIVE DOCUMENT ORDER
========================================================================

1. CURRENT WATLINGTON COLTS SALE CONTRACT / CONVEYANCE
- exact title wording;
- schedules;
- reservations;
- rights expressly conveyed or excluded;
- predecessor deed recital chain.

2. ORIGINAL 1587 / 1596 COLT -> SHOULDHAM ASSURANCE SET
Search seller as:
GEORGE COLT OF CAVENDISH, ESQUIRE,
son/heir of Henry Colt and grandson/heir in the line of Sir George Colt.
Include the reported 1581 lease.

3. WATLINGTON 1435-36 COURT BARON / CUSTOMARY COURT ROLL
- modern shelfmark;
- customs;
- fold;
- rents;
- manor identity.

4. F(M) ROLL 160, 1452-1453
- full roll/image;
- identify exact Watlington manor stream.

5. NRO HARE 4056 — 14th-century custumal
- exact title;
- local customs;
- services;
- foldage/minerals/common.

6. NRO HARE 2454 — 1554-1558 court book
- identify which Watlington manor;
- test Colts / Gawsells / other stream.

7. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP + CLAIMS
together with NRO MS 7245, 7B4.

8. PLestow -> Barker ADVOWSON TRANSFER
- deed / presentation / patronage instrument between the 1845 and 1870-72 positions.

9. DURHAM D/HH 8/2/86
- c.1930 Edleston list of manors and advowsons.

10. 1929 HUMPHREYS -> EDLESTON ALLEGED WATLINGTON COLTS CONVEYANCE.

11. HARE 6374/1-4, HARE 6375/1-72 AND HARE 6956/1-5
- c.1900 Hare/Hoff exchanges / possible severances and reservations.

12. ACTUAL 1943 HARE ESTATE -> FORESTRY COMMISSION LEASE + PLAN
plus all supplemental/variation/assignment deeds.

13. 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN LEASE.

14. HMLR MANORIAL / FRANCHISE INDEX + CURRENT/HISTORIC PARCEL TITLES
+ filed deeds + former-copyhold enfranchisement/compensation papers.

========================================================================
DX. PASS 9 — NEW URL / DOWNLOAD LEDGER ITEMS
========================================================================

New URLs added to the cumulative CSV include:

1. Essex Archives Online D/P 214/25/11
George Colt of Cavendish generational identification:
https://www.essexarchivesonline.co.uk/Result_Details.aspx?DocID=45844

2. Forestry England current Shouldham/Bilney forest-plan page:
https://www.forestryengland.uk/forest-planning/shouldham-and-bilney-forest-plan

3. A Vision of Britain — 1870-72 Watlington Gazetteer entry:
https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/place/6039

4. Historic England — Old Rectory / 1845 Watlington patronage quotation:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1464092

5. Downloadable historical Suffolk source useful for the Colt/Cavendish context:
https://suffolkguildhalls.com/resources/History_Antiquities_Suckling_Vol1.pdf

6. Searchable OCR of the Suffolk visitation compilation:
https://archive.org/stream/visitationsuffo00hervgoog/visitationsuffo00hervgoog_djvu.txt

7. Direct downloadable PDF of the Suffolk visitation compilation:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bf/The_visitation_of_Suffolke_IA_visitationofsuff01harv.pdf

The last three are source-finders / historical compilations and are not substitutes for
the operative Watlington conveyance.

========================================================================
DY. PASS 9 — WHAT WAS ACTUALLY LEARNED
========================================================================

1. The 2025 title narrative's post-1570s Colt genealogy is materially wrong or compressed.
Official Essex archive metadata identifies the later George Colt as the son/heir of
Henry Colt, who was son/heir of the elder Sir George Colt.

2. The correct post-1570s search target is therefore a younger GEORGE COLT OF CAVENDISH,
ESQUIRE — not an assumed "Sir George Colt, son of George."

3. That correction fits Historic England's neutral wording that "George Colt" sold
Colt's/Trussbutt's manor in 1587, but the actual sale deed remains missing.

4. The nineteenth-century Watlington patronage did not simply remain attached to the
named Gawsells lordship:
Plestow held both in 1845; Barker held the patronage by 1870-72; Coote was lord of
Gawsells while Barker remained patron in 1883.

5. Therefore any claimed modern advowson/patronage cannot be inferred merely from
ownership of a Watlington manorial title.

6. Forestry England currently still describes Shouldham as LEASEHOLD land, consistent
with the historic 1943 long-lease framework. This does not prove unchanged sporting
reservations or a Colts connection.

7. The most important missing operative documents remain missing. PASS 9 narrows the
people and title streams to search; it does not manufacture continuity where the
deeds have not yet been found.

END OF PASS 9 ADDITION
END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
========================================================================
DZ. PASS 10 — RIGHTS-FIRST CONTINUITY
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 10 continues from PASS 9 without deleting, replacing or silently promoting any
earlier finding.

USER WORKING CURRENT STYLE / ENDPOINT:
Watlington-West.

HISTORICAL RIGHTS TARGET:
Watlington-Coltes / Watlington-Colts / Watlington-Trussbuts / Trusbutts.

The current style is an endpoint for the title chain. It is NOT a licence to absorb
rights from every manor or estate called Watlington, Shouldham, Gawsells, West Dereham,
Tottenhill or another manor later held by a common owner.

PASS 10 therefore prioritises:
- rights actually expressed in operative instruments;
- court/custom records capable of showing exercise of a manorial custom;
- enclosure documents capable of transforming or reserving common/fold/waste rights;
- conveyances capable of proving whether a right moved with Colts/Trussbutts;
- severance/reservation instruments;
- modern title evidence capable of proving present ownership.

No new presently exercisable substantive right of Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts is proved
by this pass.

========================================================================
EA. MAJOR DOMESDAY SOURCE AUDIT — SALE CATALOGUE RIGHTS BUNDLE DOWNGRADED
========================================================================

PASS 10 re-audited the 2025 Manorial Services Watlington Colts catalogue against
Open Domesday/PASE rather than treating its Domesday paragraph as a single historical
manor entry.

2025 MANORIAL SERVICES CATALOGUE:
https://www.manorialservices.com/uploads/1/0/1/4/101463086/manorial_services_lord_of_the_manor_winter_2025_vol_11b.pdf

The Watlington Colts page states that in 1086:
- "this manor" was held by Ralph Baynard;
- it had previously belonged to Ailid;
- it was worth £2 per year; and
- it included tenants/freemen plus a mill, fishery and two churches.

PASS 10 COMPARISON:

1. RALPH BAYNARD — SHOULDHAM THORPE
Open Domesday:
https://opendomesday.org/place/TF6607/shouldham-thorpe/

The Ralph Baynard holding there is:
- held before 1066 by Aelgyth;
- annual value £2 in 1086;
- 22.5 freemen;
- one men's plough team;
- entry mentions Shouldham Thorpe and Tottenhill.

That Baynard entry does NOT list:
- a mill;
- a fishery;
- two churches.

2. RALPH BAYNARD — SHOULDHAM [ALL SAINTS AND ST MARGARET]
Open Domesday:
https://opendomesday.org/place/XX0000/shouldham-all-saints-and-st-margaret/

The Baynard entry there is:
- lord/tenant-in-chief Ralph Baynard;
- lord in 1066 Aelgyth;
- 21 villagers;
- 15 freemen;
- 18 smallholders;
- 4 slaves;
- 4 lord's plough teams;
- 3 men's plough teams;
- 20 acres meadow;
- 0.8 mills;
- 1 fishery;
- 1 salthouse;
- 2 churches;
- 0.6 church lands;
- annual value £15 6s in 1086, £12 in 1066.

Open Domesday exposes the same entry under:
https://opendomesday.org/place/XX0000/other-shouldham/

3. CLACKCLOSE PLACE LIST
https://opendomesday.org/hundred/clackclose/

Open Domesday lists:
- Shouldham [All Saints and St Margaret];
- other Shouldham;
- Shouldham Thorpe;
- Tottenhill;
- Wallington;
and the other recorded Clackclose places.

It does NOT list a Domesday place called "Watlington".

4. WALLINGTON IS NOT A BAYNARD SUBSTITUTE
https://opendomesday.org/place/TF6207/wallington/

The Norfolk Clackclose Wallington entry is under:
- Roger Bigot; and
- Hermer of Ferrers.

It is not a Ralph Baynard holding.

5. AILID / AELGYTH CHECK
PASE:
https://pase.ac.uk/domesday/name/2901/

The PASE Domesday person record for Æthelgyth/Ailid identifies Baynard succession at
Shouldham and other Norfolk places, but does not supply a Watlington entry.

STATUS:
[Verified at Open Domesday/PASE digital-edition level, compared against the 2025 sale
catalogue page.]

PASS 10 CONCLUSION:
[Inference]
The 2025 Watlington Colts catalogue paragraph appears to combine or transpose details
from separate Baynard/Shouldham Domesday entries:
- the £2 valuation corresponds to Baynard's Shouldham Thorpe/Tottenhill entry;
- the mill/fishery/two-church resource package occurs in Baynard's separate Shouldham
entry, whose value is £15 6s rather than £2.

The catalogue also omits the salthouse found in that Shouldham resource package.

RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:
The following MUST NOT presently be represented as proved Domesday rights of
Watlington-Coltes/Trussbutts:
- mill / milling interest;
- fishery / piscary;
- the two churches / church-land component;
- salthouse / salt-working profit.

They remain HIGH-VALUE EARLY SHOULDHAM/BAYNARD LEADS only.

To restore any of them to the Colts rights chain, evidence must show that the relevant
Baynard Shouldham holding or the particular right descended, was transferred, or was
later recombined into the estate that became Trussbutts/Colts.

IMPORTANT TITLE-CHAIN EFFECT:
The supplied early Ailid -> Baynard working title sequence now requires the same
documentary caution. PASS 10 does NOT disprove a later historical connection between
Baynard's Shouldham estate and Trussbutts/Colts; it shows that the 2025 catalogue's
purported Domesday "Watlington" bundle cannot itself prove that connection.

========================================================================
EB. 1506 FREE FOLD / ADVOWSON — PREDECESSOR TITLE PROBLEM SHARPENED
========================================================================

DIRECT RECORD:
CP 25/1/170/197 no.106
8 July 1506

ABSTRACT:
https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_170_197.shtml

ORIGINAL IMAGE:
https://aalt.law.uh.edu/AALT4/CP251/CP251no170/IMG_0159.htm

PARTIES:
QUERENTS:
- Henry Wyatt, esquire;
- Richard Wyatt, clerk;
- Reynold Pegge.

DEFORCIANTS:
- Robert Pynkeney;
- Elizabeth his wife.

PROPERTY / RIGHTS:
- manor of Watlyngton;
- 1 messuage;
- 200 acres land;
- 20 acres meadow;
- 40 acres pasture;
- 10 acres wood;
- 16s rent;
- ONE FREE FOLD;
- advowson of St Peter of Watlyngton.

PASS 10 IMPORTANT WORDING:
The abstract states that Robert and Elizabeth acknowledged the manor/tenements/free
fold/advowson as Henry's right, as property which Henry, Richard and Reynold had
"of their gift", and quitclaimed it from themselves and THE HEIRS OF ELIZABETH.

SIGNIFICANCE:
This strengthens the need to identify the title immediately BEFORE 1506.

[Inference]
The express reference to the heirs of Elizabeth makes her title/inheritance route an
especially important avenue of investigation, but the fine alone does NOT prove that
Elizabeth was an heiress or identify how she acquired the Watlyngton estate.

CURRENT RIGHTS STATUS:
- the free fold is DIRECTLY expressed in the 1506 instrument;
- the advowson is DIRECTLY expressed in the 1506 instrument;
- the 16s rent is DIRECTLY expressed in the 1506 instrument;
- their identity as rights of the Trussbutts/Colts title stream is STILL NOT PROVED,
because the Pynkeney -> Wyatt/Pegge estate has not been bridged to the medieval
Trussbut/Colt stream.

NEW PREDECESSOR TARGET:
Find:
- Robert Pynkeney's marriage / settlement;
- Elizabeth Pynkeney's parentage and inheritance;
- feoffments or releases before July 1506;
- any IPM or will naming Watlyngton;
- Wyatt/Pegge conveyances immediately before/after the fine.

The absence of an easy public-web Pynkeney pedigree is NOT evidence against the chain.

========================================================================
EC. HENRY WYATT — NEW FORWARD-CHAIN DOCUMENT TARGET
========================================================================

Sir Henry Wyatt died in 1537.

A historical biographical source identifies:
- an inquisition post mortem in 1537:
Inq. post mort. 28 Henry VIII, membrane 5;
- his will proved 21 February 1537/8:
cited as Cromwell, folio 7.

SOURCE:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dictionary_of_National_Biography_1885-1900/Wyatt_Thomas_1503-1542

STATUS:
[Historical secondary source identifying archival/probate targets.]

PASS 10 USE:
Because Henry Wyatt is the named principal recipient of the 1506 Watlyngton manor,
his 1537 IPM and will become major forward-chain tests for:
- whether Watlyngton remained in his estate;
- how it was described;
- whether the free fold, rent or advowson were separately mentioned;
- whether the manor was sold, settled, entailed or transferred before his death.

I cannot verify from the publicly recovered material in this pass that the 1537 IPM or
will contains Watlyngton.

========================================================================
ED. COLT SELLER — YOUNGER GEORGE CONFIRMED ACTIVE IN THE RIGHT PERIOD
========================================================================

PASS 9 corrected the 2025 catalogue's compressed Colt generation using Essex Archives.

ESSEX ARCHIVES:
D/P 214/25/11
https://www.essexarchivesonline.co.uk/Result_Details.aspx?DocID=45844

The official catalogue identifies:
GEORGE COLT OF CAVENDISH, ESQUIRE
as:
- son and heir of Henry Colt;
- Henry being son and heir of the deceased Sir George Colt.

PASS 10 adds independent period evidence that this younger George was active as an
esquire in the 1580s.

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO:
Sir Nicholas Bacon Collection of English Court and Manorial Documents
https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/spcl/findaid/bacon/15.php

A c.1587 entry names:
John Forres, undersheriff of GEORGE COLTE, ESQ., Suffolk.

A historical Suffolk sheriff list likewise places:
1586 — George Colt of Cavendish, Esq.

DOWNLOADABLE HISTORICAL SOURCE:
https://suffolkguildhalls.com/resources/History_Antiquities_Suckling_Vol1.pdf

STATUS:
[Verified for existence/activity of a George Colt/Colte, esquire, in the relevant
period; Watlington conveyance itself still missing.]

SIGNIFICANCE:
This further supports using the younger George Colt of Cavendish, esquire, as the
principal search target for the reported:
- 1581 lease;
- 1587 sale in the Historic England account;
- 1596 conveyance in the 2025 catalogue account.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
Neither the sheriff evidence nor D/P 214/25/11 proves that he executed the Watlington
Colts conveyance.

The operative deed remains decisive.

========================================================================
EE. HARE 2495 — WHY THE 1633 FIELD BOOK REMAINS A RIGHTS PRIORITY
========================================================================

OFFICIAL HISTORIC ENGLAND RECORD:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446

ARCHIVE SOURCE IDENTIFIED THERE:
NRO HARE 2495
Field Book, 1633.

Historic England's use of HARE 2495 shows that Colt's/Trussbutt's remained a separately
identifiable physical estate in 1633, with:
- Colt's / manor-house area;
- four tenements with yards;
- alder carr;
- Appletons;
- tenant occupation.

It also states that there were three principal manors in Shouldham and identifies
Colt's manor, also known as Trussbutt's, as one of them.

RIGHTS SIGNIFICANCE:
The published summary is mainly physical/tenurial. It does NOT give a complete
incorporeal-rights schedule.

Therefore HARE 2495 remains a first-tier target to inspect for:
- rents;
- customary tenures;
- tenant obligations;
- fold/foldage language;
- commons;
- waste;
- woods/carr;
- access;
- drainage;
- fisheries;
- warrens;
- any reservations attached specifically to Colts.

The fact that Judge Gawdy later owned both Colts and Shouldham Priory manor does NOT
merge the rights of those manors automatically.

========================================================================
EF. FALSE RECORD-SERIES LEAD REMOVED — WIVENHOE, NOT WATLINGTON COLTS
========================================================================

During PASS 10 the 2025 catalogue's searchable text initially surfaced a long record
series containing:
- court rolls;
- an extent;
- rentals;
- surveys;
- bailiff accounts;
- court books;
- licences to demise;
- admissions/surrenders;
- enfranchisement deeds.

PASS 10 checked the PDF page boundaries.

CORRECTION:
That large 1381-1930 record series belongs to a DIFFERENT catalogue lot/manor
(Wivenhoe), not Watlington Colts.

It is therefore EXCLUDED from:
- the Watlington Colts evidence base;
- the rights ledger;
- the archive-retrieval list.

This correction is recorded expressly so it cannot be accidentally re-imported in a
later pass.

========================================================================
EG. 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE — RIGHTS TRANSFORMATION STILL CENTRAL
========================================================================

The existence of the Norfolk statute remains verified:

Watlington Inclosure Act 1748
22 Geo. II private c.37
Royal Assent: 26 May 1749

TITLE:
"An Act for enclosing and dividing certain Commons and Wastes, within the Manor and
Parish of Watlington, in the County of Norfolk."

OPEN SOURCE:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/

A surviving award extract remains identified at NRO:
MS 7245, 7B4
"Extract of Award under Watlington Inclosure Act, allotment to Elizabeth Roberts"
1749.

NRO URL:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/extract-of-award-under-watlington-inclosure-act-allotment-to-elizabeth-roberts

PASS 10 RESULT:
No full award, map, claims book or commissioners' papers were recovered online in this
pass.

RIGHTS IMPORTANCE:
The full award remains one of the most important documents for determining whether
pre-1749:
- common rights;
- waste rights;
- lord's rights in soil of waste;
- fold/foldcourse;
- roads/ways;
- drainage;
- fencing;
- mineral reservations;
were:
- allotted;
- commuted;
- extinguished;
- reserved;
- converted into specific parcels or obligations.

The mere existence of the Act does NOT tell us the result for Colts.

========================================================================
EH. PASS 10 — CURRENT RIGHTS EFFECT
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 10 EFFECT
-------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------

Domesday mill DOWNGRADED.
Proved in Baynard Shouldham resource package;
not proved as Watlington-Colts.

Domesday fishery/piscary DOWNGRADED.
Same reason. Do not use the auction paragraph
as Colts proof.

Domesday churches/church lands DOWNGRADED AS COLTS EVIDENCE.
Baynard Shouldham resource evidence only.
Distinct from the directly expressed 1506
St Peter advowson.

Domesday salthouse NEW WIDER-ESTATE LEAD ONLY.
Open Domesday Baynard Shouldham resource.
No Colts descent proved.

One free fold Directly documented in 1506.
Particular Colts identity still requires the
Pynkeney/Elizabeth -> Wyatt -> later bridge.

16s rent Directly documented in 1506.
Same identity/continuity gap.

St Peter advowson Directly documented in 1506.
Same identity gap, plus later nineteenth-century
patronage severance already demonstrated.

Court/custom No new Colts court-roll text recovered.
HARE 2495 remains high priority.

Commons/waste Full 1749 award still missing.

Foldcourse/foldage No new continuation/extinction instrument.

Warren 1634 lease original still missing.

Sporting rights 1943 reservation lead remains real but wider
Hare Estate/Shouldham, not proved Colts.

Mines/minerals No direct Colts reservation recovered.

Market/fair No new evidence assigning either Watlington or
Shouldham market franchise to Colts.

Present exercisable substantive
right NONE newly proved by PASS 10.

========================================================================
EI. PASS 10 — REVISED DECISIVE DOCUMENT ORDER
========================================================================

1. CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST / FORMER WATLINGTON COLTS-TRUSSBUTTS CONVEYANCE
- exact property/title description;
- rights schedule;
- reservations/exceptions;
- recitals;
- predecessor deed references.

2. PRE-1506 PYNKENEY / ELIZABETH TITLE
- establish the source of the manor/free fold/advowson dealt with in CP25/1/170/197.

3. HENRY WYATT 1537 IPM + 1537/8 WILL
- test forward survival/devolution of the 1506 manor and rights.

4. ORIGINAL 1581 / 1587 / 1596 COLT ASSURANCE SET
- search younger George Colt/Colte of Cavendish, esquire.

5. NRO HARE 2495 — FULL 1633 FIELD BOOK
- extract all Colts-specific rents/customs/obligations/rights.

6. WATLINGTON 1435-36 COURT BARON / CUSTOMARY COURT ROLL
- establish shelfmark/manor identity and rights/customs.

7. F(M) ROLL 160, 1452-1453
- identify exact manor stream and extract customs.

8. NRO HARE 4056 — MEDIEVAL CUSTUMAL
- establish precise manor identity before using any custom.

9. NRO HARE 2454 — COURT BOOK 1554-1558 WATLINGTON ENTRIES
- identify Colts/Gawsells/other manor.

10. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP + CLAIMS + COMMISSIONERS' PAPERS
- extract every lord/common/fold/mineral/road/drain reservation and allotment.

11. D/HH 8/2/86 — R.H. EDLESTON MANORS / ADVOWSONS c.1930.

12. ALLEGED 1929 HUMPHREYS -> EDLESTON WATLINGTON COLTS CONVEYANCE.

13. HARE 6374/1-4 + HARE 6375/1-72 + HARE 6956/1-5
- investigate c.1900 estate exchanges/severances/reservations.

14. ACTUAL 1943 HARE ESTATE -> FORESTRY COMMISSION LEASE + PLAN
+ variations/assignments.

15. 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN LEASE.

16. HMLR MANORIAL/FRANCHISE INDEX + HISTORIC/CURRENT PARCEL REGISTERS
+ FILED DEEDS + FORMER-COPYHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT/COMPENSATION PAPERS.

========================================================================
EJ. PASS 10 — NEW / UPDATED URL LEDGER ITEMS
========================================================================

Newly added/opened source routes include:

1. Open Domesday — Ralph Baynard:
https://opendomesday.org/name/ralph-baynard/

2. Open Domesday — Shouldham [All Saints and St Margaret]:
https://opendomesday.org/place/XX0000/shouldham-all-saints-and-st-margaret/

3. Open Domesday — other Shouldham:
https://opendomesday.org/place/XX0000/other-shouldham/

4. Open Domesday — Shouldham Thorpe:
https://opendomesday.org/place/TF6607/shouldham-thorpe/

5. Open Domesday — Clackclose Hundred:
https://opendomesday.org/hundred/clackclose/

6. Open Domesday — Wallington:
https://opendomesday.org/place/TF6207/wallington/

7. PASE — Æthelgyth/Ailid Domesday record:
https://pase.ac.uk/domesday/name/2901/

8. Norfolk Heritage Explorer — Shouldham parish:
https://www.heritage.norfolk.gov.uk/record-details?uid=TNF1575

9. University of Chicago — Sir Nicholas Bacon Collection:
https://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/spcl/findaid/bacon/15.php

10. DNB/Wikisource — Henry Wyatt archival target citation:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dictionary_of_National_Biography_1885-1900/Wyatt_Thomas_1503-1542

Existing rows for the 2025 Manorial Services/Feudal Titles narrative have been retained
but their notes/status are updated to record the PASS 10 Domesday conflation problem.

========================================================================
EK. PASS 10 — WHAT WAS ACTUALLY LEARNED
========================================================================

1. The alleged Domesday "Watlington Colts" bundle in the 2025 sale catalogue cannot be
accepted as one Domesday entry.

2. The catalogue's £2 value corresponds to Ralph Baynard's Shouldham Thorpe/Tottenhill
entry, which does not contain the mill/fishery/two-church package.

3. Baynard's separate Shouldham entry contains the mill, fishery, salthouse and two
churches, but is valued at £15 6s.

4. Open Domesday's Clackclose place list does not identify a Domesday "Watlington";
the similarly named Wallington is a different holding under Roger Bigot/Hermer,
not Ralph Baynard.

5. Therefore the Domesday mill and fishery must be REMOVED from the category of
directly evidenced Colts rights. The salthouse is only a newly exposed wider
Shouldham/Baynard lead.

6. The 1506 free fold, 16s rent and St Peter advowson remain much stronger evidence
because they are expressed in a specific legal instrument. Their weakness is not
existence in 1506, but the unproved identity bridge from Pynkeney/Elizabeth/Wyatt
to the Trussbutts/Colts title stream.

7. The 1506 fine's wording makes the Pynkeney/Elizabeth predecessor title a priority.
Elizabeth's heirs are expressly included in the quitclaim, but her inheritance
route is not yet known.

8. Henry Wyatt's 1537 IPM and will are now explicit forward-chain targets capable of
showing whether the 1506 rights continued with his estate.

9. Independent 1580s evidence places George Colt/Colte of Cavendish, esquire, in the
right generation and period for the reported Colt alienation. The operative
Watlington conveyance remains missing.

10. HARE 2495 remains one of the best rights-bearing physical/tenurial documents for
Colts because Historic England shows the estate was still separately identifiable
in 1633.

11. A tempting large court-roll/archive series found through the 2025 catalogue was
checked and rejected because it belongs to Wivenhoe, not Watlington Colts.

12. No new present-day exercisable Watlington-West / former Colts-Trussbutts substantive
right is proved in PASS 10.

END OF PASS 10 ADDITION
END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
========================================================================
EL. PASS 11 — RIGHTS-FIRST CONTINUITY
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 11 continues from PASS 10 without deleting or silently replacing any earlier
finding, caution, source URL, negative search result or rights-survival assessment.

CURRENT TITLE-CHAIN ENDPOINT / WORKING STYLE:
Watlington-West.

HISTORICAL MANOR RIGHTS TARGET:
Watlington-Coltes / Watlington-Colts / Watlington-Trussbuts / Trusbutts.

The title chain remains a documentary route to the rights. It is not itself proof that
a right belonging to a neighbouring or commonly owned manor passed with Colts.

PASS 11 concentrated on:
- medieval survey/custumal material likely to expose actual field structure and tenant
holdings during the Trussbut period;
- separating Shouldham Priory records from the Colts/Trussbutts stream;
- enclosure evidence capable of transforming common, road, drainage and timber
interests;
- the modern sporting-right reservation trail;
- the still-unresolved 1506 Pynkeney/Elizabeth predecessor title;
- rights whose current status could materially change if one decisive document is found.

No new presently exercisable substantive Watlington-West / former
Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts right is proved by PASS 11.

========================================================================
EM. NEW MAJOR MEDIEVAL ARCHIVE TARGET — NRO HARE 2826, 1440-1441
========================================================================

PASS 11 identifies a previously unrecorded high-value Shouldham field-book/survey source.

ARCHIVE REFERENCE:
Norfolk Record Office
HARE 2826

DATE:
1440-1441

EXACT MAP FOLIOS IDENTIFIED IN SCHOLARSHIP:
- fol. 16v
- fol. 34v

OFFICIAL NORFOLK RECORDS COMMITTEE EVIDENCE:
A Norfolk Records Committee report states that conservation work included:

"a Shouldham field book, 1440-1, which incorporates diagrammatic maps of field strips"

OFFICIAL NORFOLK COUNCIL DOCUMENT URL:
https://norfolkcc.cmis.uk.com/NorfolkCC/Document.ashx?FgPlIEJYlotSYGoBi5olA=NHdURQburHA&WGewmoAfeNQ16B2MHuCpMRKZMwaG1PaO=ctNJFf55vVA&WGewmoAfeNR9xqBux0r1Q8Za60lavYmz=ctNJFf55vVA&czJKcaeAi5tUFL1DTL2UE4zNRBcoShgo=3SK2f8R9WhlLVcDSzf6dq7qwiFJQdoSt5AW5wlAuiavhWLpJhlAvw&d9Qjj0ag1Pd993jsyOJqFvmyB7X0CSQK=ctNJFf55vVA&kCx1AnS9pWZQ40DXFvdEw=hFflUdN3100&mCTIbCubSFfXsDGW9IXnlg=hFflUdN3100&rUzwRPfZ3zd4E7Ikn8Lyw=pwRE6AGJFLDNlh225F5QMaQWCtPHwdhUfCZLUQzgA2uL5jNRG4jdQ&uJovDxwdjMPoYvAJvYtyA=ctNJFf55vVA

INDEPENDENT SCHOLARLY IDENTIFICATION:
The History of Cartography, vol. 1, chapter 20, identifies:

"1440-41: Shouldham (Norfolk). Norwich, Norfolk Record Office,
Hare 2826, fols. 16v, 34v."

DIRECT DOWNLOADABLE PDF:
https://press.uchicago.edu/books/hoc/HOC_V1/HOC_VOLUME1_chapter20.pdf

The same scholarly discussion explains that the Shouldham plans:
- were not the finished survey;
- occur among preliminary notes/drafts;
- cover only a tiny portion of the lands covered by the draft survey.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC ROUTE TO THE DEDICATED STUDY:
P. D. A. Harvey,
"Shouldham, Norfolk, 1440-1441",
in R. A. Skelton and P. D. A. Harvey (eds.),
Local Maps and Plans from Medieval England,
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986, pp. 195-201.

Open bibliographic confirmation:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03085694.2025.2575607

STATUS:
[Verified as to the existence, date, NRO shelfmark and two mapped folios through official
Norfolk reporting plus published cartographic scholarship.]

CRITICAL LIMIT:
[Unverified]
I cannot yet verify which Shouldham manor generated HARE 2826.

No public image/full transcription of HARE 2826 itself was recovered in PASS 11.

Therefore HARE 2826 MUST NOT yet be called:
- the Trussbut field book;
- the Colts field book;
- the Priory field book;
or
- proof of any specific Colts custom/right.

WHY IT IS HIGH-VALUE:
The date 1440-41 falls directly within the period in which the Trussbut estate/fee stream
is active in the Shouldham-Watlington evidence already assembled.

[Inference]
If the field book identifies the relevant lord/manor, tenants or parcels as the Trussbut
estate, its written survey could materially illuminate:
- open-field strips;
- tenant holdings;
- parcel boundaries;
- acreages;
- rents/services if stated;
- common-field organisation;
- ways/access;
- relationships between demesne and tenant land;
- possible context for fold/foldcourse arrangements.

Those are research possibilities, NOT findings from the unread original.

NEXT ACTION:
Order/inspect the COMPLETE HARE 2826 field book, not only fols. 16v and 34v.

Extract:
1. opening heading/title;
2. named lord/manor;
3. named tenants;
4. place/field names;
5. rents/services/customs;
6. common/fold language;
7. boundaries/ways/drains;
8. every Trussbut/Trussebut/Colt/Shuldham name;
9. relationship to known HARE 2493 / 2683 / 2684 evidence;
10. whether any mapped/written parcels later appear in HARE 2495 (1633).

========================================================================
EN. IMPORTANT SEPARATION — "DERSINGHAM SHOULDHAM" COURT/RENTAL RECORDS
========================================================================

A 2026 peer-reviewed study supplies exact Norfolk Record Office references for a
different Shouldham manorial stream:

DERSINGHAM SHOULDHAM COURT ROLLS
1495-1509
NRO WAL 1058, 285x2

DERSINGHAM SHOULDHAM RENTAL
1499/1500
NRO PD 603/197

SOURCE:
Spike Gibbs,
"Whose was the Fifteenth-century Manor Court?"
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jbwg-2026-0005/html

Separate Dersingham historical material identifies a SHOULDHAM PRIORY MANOR in
Dersingham and states that its rent rolls survive.

SOURCE-FINDER:
https://dersinghamhistory.info/gelham_manor.html

STATUS:
[Verified that the NRO references are explicitly described as "Dersingham Shouldham"
court rolls/rental by the scholarly source.]

[Inference]
The Dersingham evidence strongly indicates that WAL 1058 / PD 603/197 belong to the
Dersingham Shouldham Priory manorial estate rather than Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts.

RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:
Do NOT import customs, rents, heriots, court incidents or tenant obligations from
WAL 1058 / PD 603/197 into the Colts rights ledger.

VALUE TO THIS PROJECT:
They are useful as:
- a comparator for how Shouldham Priory customs were administered;
- evidence helping separate similarly named Shouldham archival records;
- a warning that the word "Shouldham" in an archive title is insufficient.

========================================================================
EO. 1798 SHOULDHAM INCLOSURE SCHEDULE — PROVENANCE UPGRADED
========================================================================

The previously captured downloadable schedule now has stronger bibliographic provenance.

TITLE:
Shouldham and Shouldham-Thorpe Inclosure:
schedule of the public allotments, public, private and bridle roads, footpaths, drain,
fences, rules, orders, &c.

DATE:
1798

PUBLISHER:
R. Marshall, Lynn Regis [King's Lynn]

EXTENT:
11 pages

CORPORATE AUTHOR:
Commissioners for Dividing, Alloting and Inclosing the Common Fields within the
Parishes of Shouldham and Shouldham-Thorpe.

HEIDELBERG CATALOGUE:
https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/1055420672

DIRECT DOCUMENT-SCAN LEAD:
https://assets.cengage.com/gale/psm/1005000R.pdf

PROVENANCE RECORDED BY HEIDELBERG:
- reproduction from the Kress Library of Business and Economics, Harvard University;
- Goldsmiths'-Kress no. 17267.1;
- OCLC 22695421.

IMPORTANT MANUSCRIPT ADDITION:
The catalogue states that the copy contains a manuscript:
"License to fell timber"
signed by THOMAS HARE,
mounted between pages 8 and 9.

STATUS:
[Verified at bibliographic-catalogue level.]

RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:
The schedule is now a stronger source for the statutory restructuring of:
- public allotments;
- private allotments;
- public roads;
- private roads;
- bridle roads;
- footpaths;
- drain;
- fences;
- rules/orders.

The Thomas Hare timber licence proves that this surviving copy carries an estate-related
timber document.

CRITICAL COLTS LIMIT:
It does NOT by itself prove:
- a Colts timber franchise/right;
- that a listed road/drain burden affected Colts;
- that an allotment was made in respect of the Colts lordship;
- that a common right belonging to Colts survived the award.

The schedule/award must be parcel-matched against Colts estate land.

A local historical transcription of an 1796 enclosure notice additionally preserves
descriptions of roads being set out by the commissioners:

https://stokeferrydhg.org/1750-1799-a-chronicle-of-events-in-the-village-of-stoke-ferry-norfolk/

This is a source-finder/transcription, not a substitute for the original notice or award.

========================================================================
EP. SPORTING RIGHTS — MODERN LANDOWNER LEAD NARROWED, RIGHT OWNER NOT PROVED
========================================================================

The official Forestry England plan remains direct evidence that:
- Shouldham is leasehold woodland;
- sporting rights were retained by "the estate";
- the rights were exercised in the Shouldham Sincks;
- rights of access to private houses and powerline/gas wayleaves also existed.

DIRECT FORESTRY PLAN:
https://www.forestryengland.uk/sites/default/files/documents/ShouldhamandBilneyForestPlan2016-2026_0.pdf

PASS 11 combines that with the already captured 2021 Shouldham Parish Council page:

https://shouldham-pc.gov.uk/2021/01/23/shouldham-sincks-change-of-access/

The Parish Council expressly states:
- Shouldham Sincks is owned by STOW ESTATES;
- Stow Estates had given permission for public access;
- access remained required for Stow Estates and residents.

STATUS:
[Verified that the Sincks landowner was publicly identified as Stow Estates in 2021.]

[Inference]
Because the Forestry plan says the retained estate sporting rights were exercised in the
Sincks, and the 2021 local public-body page identifies Stow Estates as landowner of the
Sincks, STOW ESTATES becomes a concrete modern entity to investigate in the sporting
rights chain.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
This does NOT prove that Stow Estates owns the sporting rights.

Land ownership and sporting-right ownership can be separate.

DECISIVE DOCUMENTS:
- actual 1943 Hare Estate -> Forestry Commission lease;
- any variation/supplemental deed/assignment;
- current HMLR title for the Sincks;
- any separate sporting-right title/reservation;
- documents showing whether "the estate" retained the rights through later transfers.

COLTS LIMIT:
Even if the current sporting owner is identified, a separate step is required to prove
that the sporting rights ever belonged to Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts rather than the
wider Hare/Stow estate.

========================================================================
EQ. 1506 PYNKENEY / ELIZABETH / WYATT CHAIN — PASS 11 SEARCH STATUS
========================================================================

The operative 1506 fine remains:

CP 25/1/170/197 no.106
8 July 1506

https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_170_197.shtml

It expressly includes:
- manor of Watlyngton;
- 16s rent;
- one free fold;
- advowson of St Peter of Watlyngton.

The parties remain:
Henry Wyatt, Richard Wyatt and Reynold Pegge
v.
Robert Pynkeney and Elizabeth his wife.

The "of their gift" / Elizabeth-heirs wording remains the major predecessor-title clue.

PASS 11 RESULT:
No new public-web deed, IPM, probate text or pedigree was recovered which proves:
- Elizabeth Pynkeney's parentage/inheritance;
- how Robert and Elizabeth obtained this Watlyngton manor;
- a Trussbut/Colt -> Pynkeney bridge;
- a Pynkeney/Wyatt -> later Colt bridge.

Likewise, the actual Henry Wyatt 1537 IPM/will text was not recovered online in a form
that establishes Watlyngton.

STATUS:
UNRESOLVED, NOT DISPROVED.

RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:
The 1506 free fold, rent and advowson remain DIRECTLY documented in that Watlyngton
transaction, but are still not promoted to proved continuous Colts rights.

========================================================================
ER. PASS 11 — EFFECT ON SPECIFIC RIGHTS
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 11 EFFECT
------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------

Manorial land / field strips NEW HIGH-VALUE SOURCE.
HARE 2826, 1440-41, is an actual Shouldham field
book/draft survey with diagrammatic strip maps.
Manor identity not yet established.

One free fold NO NEW DIRECT PROOF.
HARE 2826 could provide field-system context if the
record proves to be the Trussbut stream, but no fold
wording has been read.

Rents / services NO NEW COLTS RIGHT.
HARE 2826 may contain useful written-survey material,
but content is unread. HARE 4058 remains the direct
1411-12 Watlyngton/Shouldham collector-of-rents target.

Court/custom STREAM SEPARATION IMPROVED.
WAL 1058 and PD 603/197 are "Dersingham Shouldham"
sources and should not be imported into Colts.

Commons / waste NO NEW COLTS SURVIVAL.
1798 Shouldham enclosure schedule provenance improved;
1749 Watlington full award remains missing.

Roads / ways / footpaths 1798 schedule expressly covers public/private/bridle
roads and footpaths. Parcel-to-Colts connection unproved.

Drainage / fences 1798 schedule expressly covers drain/fences/rules.
No Colts parcel connection yet.

Timber Surviving 1798 copy has manuscript "License to fell
timber" signed Thomas Hare.
This is estate evidence, not proof of a Colts manorial
timber right.

Sporting rights MODERN INVESTIGATION NARROWED.
Forestry plan = retained by "estate", exercised in
Sincks. 2021 Parish Council = Sincks owned by Stow
Estates. Sporting-right ownership itself unproved.

Warren No new original/archive reference recovered.

Piscary No restoration of the downgraded Domesday fishery to
the Colts rights stream.

Mines/minerals No direct Colts reservation recovered.

Market/fair No new evidence assigning franchise ownership to Colts.

Advowson No new 1506-to-later identity bridge.

Present exercisable
substantive Colts right NONE newly proved in PASS 11.

========================================================================
ES. PASS 11 — REVISED RIGHTS-FIRST DOCUMENT PRIORITY
========================================================================

1. CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST / FORMER WATLINGTON COLTS-TRUSSBUTTS CONVEYANCE
- complete operative wording;
- rights;
- reservations/exceptions;
- schedules/plans;
- predecessor recitals.

2. NRO HARE 2826 — COMPLETE SHOULDHAM FIELD BOOK / DRAFT SURVEY, 1440-41
- inspect all written survey material;
- identify lord/manor;
- fols 16v and 34v maps;
- tenants;
- fields/parcels;
- services/rents;
- common/fold/access language.

3. PRE-1506 PYNKENEY / ELIZABETH TITLE
- establish source of the manor, free fold, rent and advowson.

4. HENRY WYATT 1537 IPM + 1537/8 WILL
- trace the 1506 rights forward.

5. ORIGINAL 1581 / 1587 / 1596 COLT -> SHOULDHAM ASSURANCE SET
- use younger George Colt/Colte of Cavendish, esquire, as principal search target.

6. NRO HARE 2495 — FULL 1633 FIELD BOOK
- Colts-specific tenurial snapshot;
- extract rents, customs, foldage, commons, woods/carr, access and reservations.

7. NRO HARE 4056 — MEDIEVAL CUSTUMAL / NATIVE TENANTS
- identify exact manor before applying customs.

8. NRO HARE 4058 — WATLYNGTON AND SHULDHAM RENT COLLECTOR ACCOUNT, 1411-12
- identify lord/manor/estate stream;
- extract rents/services.

9. WATLINGTON 1435-36 COURT BARON / CUSTOMARY COURT ROLL
- recover modern shelfmark and complete text.

10. F(M) ROLL 160, 1452-1453
- identify exact Watlington manor stream and customs.

11. NRO HARE 2454 — WATLYNGTON COURT BOOK, 1554-58
- identify Colts / Gawsells / other stream.

12. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP + CLAIMS
together with NRO MS 7245, 7B4.

13. FULL 1798 SHOULDHAM / SHOULDHAM THORPE SCHEDULE + AWARD/MAP
- identify Colts parcels if any;
- inspect Thomas Hare timber licence.

14. D/HH 8/2/86 — R.H. EDLESTON MANORS / ADVOWSONS c.1930.

15. ALLEGED 1929 HUMPHREYS -> EDLESTON WATLINGTON COLTS CONVEYANCE.

16. HARE 6374/1-4 + HARE 6375/1-72 + HARE 6956/1-5
- c.1900 exchanges;
- severances/reservations;
- parcel mapping.

17. ACTUAL 1943 HARE ESTATE -> FORESTRY COMMISSION LEASE
+ plans + variations + assignments.

18. CURRENT HMLR TITLE / FILED DEEDS FOR SHOULDHAM SINCKS
- test land ownership;
- separate sporting-right ownership;
- trace "the estate" reservation.

19. 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN LEASE.

20. HMLR MANORIAL / FRANCHISE INDEX + HISTORIC/CURRENT PARCEL TITLES
+ former-copyhold enfranchisement/compensation papers.

========================================================================
ET. PASS 11 — NEW / UPDATED SOURCE URL LEDGER ITEMS
========================================================================

NEW:

1. OFFICIAL NORFOLK RECORDS COMMITTEE REPORT
Shouldham field book 1440-1 with diagrammatic maps of field strips:
https://norfolkcc.cmis.uk.com/NorfolkCC/Document.ashx?FgPlIEJYlotSYGoBi5olA=NHdURQburHA&WGewmoAfeNQ16B2MHuCpMRKZMwaG1PaO=ctNJFf55vVA&WGewmoAfeNR9xqBux0r1Q8Za60lavYmz=ctNJFf55vVA&czJKcaeAi5tUFL1DTL2UE4zNRBcoShgo=3SK2f8R9WhlLVcDSzf6dq7qwiFJQdoSt5AW5wlAuiavhWLpJhlAvw&d9Qjj0ag1Pd993jsyOJqFvmyB7X0CSQK=ctNJFf55vVA&kCx1AnS9pWZQ40DXFvdEw=hFflUdN3100&mCTIbCubSFfXsDGW9IXnlg=hFflUdN3100&rUzwRPfZ3zd4E7Ikn8Lyw=pwRE6AGJFLDNlh225F5QMaQWCtPHwdhUfCZLUQzgA2uL5jNRG4jdQ&uJovDxwdjMPoYvAJvYtyA=ctNJFf55vVA

2. DOWNLOADABLE CARTOGRAPHIC STUDY IDENTIFYING HARE 2826 / FOLIOS:
https://press.uchicago.edu/books/hoc/HOC_V1/HOC_VOLUME1_chapter20.pdf

3. HARVEY BIBLIOGRAPHIC CONFIRMATION:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03085694.2025.2575607

4. HEIDELBERG CATALOGUE — 1798 SHOULDHAM INCLOSURE SCHEDULE:
https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/1055420672

5. DERSINGHAM SHOULDHAM PRIORY MANOR SOURCE-FINDER:
https://dersinghamhistory.info/gelham_manor.html

6. LOCAL TRANSCRIPTION — 1795/1796 SHOULDHAM ENCLOSURE NOTICES / ROADS:
https://stokeferrydhg.org/1750-1799-a-chronicle-of-events-in-the-village-of-stoke-ferry-norfolk/

UPDATED:
- De Gruyter 2026 article row now records WAL 1058 and PD 603/197 specifically as
"Dersingham Shouldham" records and preserves the warning against importing them.
- Cengage/Gale 1798 schedule row now records Kress/Goldsmiths provenance and the
manuscript Thomas Hare timber licence.
- Shouldham Parish Council Sincks row now records its importance as a modern landowner
lead in the sporting-right investigation.
- Forestry England sporting-right row now expressly links the Sincks exercise location
to the Stow Estates landowner lead without treating landownership as sporting-title proof.

NO DIRECT ORIGINAL HARE 2826 IMAGE/DOWNLOAD WAS FOUND IN PASS 11.

========================================================================
EU. PASS 11 — NEGATIVE SEARCH RESULTS / NO FALSE CLOSURE
========================================================================

PASS 11 did NOT recover:

1. a digitised image/full transcription of NRO HARE 2826;
2. evidence identifying HARE 2826 specifically as Trussbutts/Colts;
3. the pre-1506 Pynkeney/Elizabeth title deed;
4. Henry Wyatt's full 1537 IPM/will text proving Watlyngton devolution;
5. the operative 1581 / 1587 / 1596 Colt conveyance;
6. the full 1749 Watlington award/map/claims;
7. an exact archive reference/full text for the 1634 Shouldham Warren lease;
8. the actual 1943 Hare Estate / Forestry lease;
9. a current instrument naming the owner of the sporting rights;
10. any new direct Colts mineral/quarry reservation;
11. any new direct Colts market/fair franchise evidence.

These remain unresolved, not disproved.

========================================================================
EV. PASS 11 — WHAT WAS ACTUALLY LEARNED
========================================================================

1. A major medieval source has been added:
NRO HARE 2826, Shouldham field book/draft survey, 1440-41.

2. The exact mapped folios are identified:
16v and 34v.

3. The source's existence/nature is independently supported by:
- an official Norfolk Records Committee report; and
- major cartographic scholarship.

4. The published cartographic analysis warns that the two maps cover only a tiny part
of the lands in the written draft survey. Therefore the WHOLE FIELD BOOK is the
target, not merely the map folios.

5. HARE 2826 has NOT been assigned to Trussbutts/Colts without seeing the original
heading/lord/tenant/parcels.

6. Exact 1495-1509 / 1499-1500 "Dersingham Shouldham" court/rental references have been
separated from the Colts stream:
WAL 1058, 285x2 and PD 603/197.

7. The 1798 Shouldham enclosure schedule now has a much firmer bibliographic provenance:
Kress Library original/reproduction trail, Goldsmiths'-Kress 17267.1, 11 pages.

8. The surviving 1798 schedule copy contains a manuscript Thomas Hare "License to fell
timber". This is an estate-level documentary lead, not a proved Colts timber right.

9. The sporting-right investigation is now narrower:
the official Forestry plan says retained estate rights were exercised in the Sincks;
a 2021 Parish Council page identifies Stow Estates as owner of the Sincks land.
This creates a concrete modern title-search target but does NOT prove Stow Estates
owns the sporting rights.

10. The 1506 free fold, rent and advowson remain among the strongest rights-bearing
evidence, but the Pynkeney/Elizabeth identity bridge still blocks their promotion
to proved continuous Colts rights.

11. No new currently exercisable Watlington-West / former Colts-Trussbutts substantive
right is established by PASS 11.

END OF PASS 11 ADDITION
END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
========================================================================
EW. PASS 12 — RIGHTS-FIRST CONTINUITY
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 12 continues from PASS 11. No earlier finding, caution, archive target, URL or
rights-survival entry has been deleted.

CURRENT ENDPOINT STYLE:
Watlington-West.

HISTORICAL RIGHTS TARGET:
Watlington-Coltes / Watlington-Colts / Watlington-Trussbuts / Trusbutts.

PASS 12 concentrated on actual franchises, burdens, courts, rents and superior-fee
records capable of explaining WHAT rights or services existed and WHICH Watlington
interest they attached to.

The central rule remains:
A right belonging to the honour of Wormegay/Bardolf, Shouldham Priory, Kervile,
Gawsells, West Dereham or another Watlington component is NOT automatically a
Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts right.

No new presently exercisable substantive right of Watlington-West is proved in this pass.

========================================================================
EX. 1403 — LAURENCE TRUSSEBUTE HELD TWO DISTINCT WATLINGTON FEE INTERESTS
========================================================================

This is one of the most important structural findings of the project.

RECORD:
Agnes Bardolf IPM
Norfolk inquisition at Shouldham
4 July 1403
E-CIPM 18-793

DIRECT DIGITAL EDITION:
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/18-789/791.html

The inquisition records among the fees assigned in Agnes Bardolf's dower:

1. WATLINGTON, TOTTENHILL, SETCHEY, SHOULDHAM THORPE AND LANGHAM
ONE KNIGHT'S FEE
held by:
- LAWRENCE TRUSSEBUTE
- and others
extended at 60s.

AND SEPARATELY:

2. WATLINGTON
ONE-QUARTER KNIGHT'S FEE
held by:
- LAWRENCE TRUSSEBUTE
- and others
extended at 10s.

STATUS:
[Verified via scholarly digital edition of the IPM.]

SIGNIFICANCE:
Laurence Trussebute was not merely connected with one generic Watlington interest.
The 1403 record places him in TWO distinct Wormegay fee entries touching Watlington.

This materially changes how every subsequent "Trussbut + Watlington" record must be
read.

It is no longer safe to argue:
"Laurence Trussbut held land/fee in Watlington, therefore every Laurence/Trussbut
Watlington record belongs to the later Colts manor."

The two fee streams have to be separated.

========================================================================
EY. 1403 -> 1427 — MAIN TRUSBUT FEE AND QUARTER-FEE SPLIT
========================================================================

RECORD:
Thomas, Duke of Exeter IPM
1427
E-CIPM 22-791

DIRECT DIGITAL EDITION:
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/22-791/794.html

The 1427 Wormegay fee list records:

MAIN FEE:
WATLINGTON, TOTTENHILL, GARBODESTHORP, SETCHEY AND ?LONGHAM
ONE KNIGHT'S FEE
held by:
THOMAS TRUSBUT AND HIS PARCENERS.

SEPARATE WATLINGTON INTEREST:
WATLINGTON
ONE-QUARTER KNIGHT'S FEE
held by:
ROBERT KERVYLE.

STATUS:
[Verified via scholarly digital edition.]

COMBINED 1403 / 1427 RESULT:

1403
LAURENCE TRUSSEBUTE
|
+-- main multi-place 1 fee including Watlington
|
+-- separate Watlington 1/4 fee

1427
|
+-- main multi-place 1 fee
| -> THOMAS TRUSBUT + parceners
|
+-- separate Watlington 1/4 fee
-> ROBERT KERVYLE

[Inference]
The main one-fee stream has a particularly strong Laurence -> Thomas Trussbut continuity.

The quarter-fee has moved out of Laurence's recorded holding by 1427 and is then in the
Kervile stream.

CRITICAL RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:
A Watlington court roll, rent, advowson, fold or other incident from the fifteenth or
sixteenth century cannot be assigned to Colts merely because:
- it says Watlington; or
- an earlier Trussbut held a Watlington fee.

The record must be attached to the correct fee/manor stream.

This is especially important for:
- the 1435-36 Watlington court roll;
- the 1506 16s rent/free fold/advowson;
- later Kervile rents;
- Gawsells and West Dereham records.

========================================================================
EZ. 1435-36 — AN ACTUAL WATLINGTON COURT BARON + CUSTOMARY COURT ROLL EXISTED
========================================================================

PASS 12 located a direct nineteenth-century Public Records inventory entry.

SOURCE:
General Report to the King in Council from the Commissioners on the Public Records,
1837, Chapter House inventory.

DIRECT DOWNLOADABLE PDF:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/General_Report_to_the_King_in_Council_from_the_Honourable_Board_of_Commissioners_on_the_Public_Records_IA_dli.granth.75463.pdf

EXACT INVENTORY DESCRIPTION:
"Watlington, manor. Roll of court baron and customary court, anno 14 Hen. VI."

DATE:
14 Henry VI = 1435-1436.

STATUS:
[Verified as an entry in the historic Public Records inventory.]

VERY IMPORTANT CORRECTION TO THE PASS-12 LIVE UPDATE:
An earlier live update suggested that proximity in the old inventory might associate this
Watlington roll with Ramsey Abbey records.

That was too strong.

The report contains Ramsey/Clackclose material nearby, but the Watlington 14 Henry VI
court-roll entry is separately listed.

Therefore:
I CANNOT VERIFY THAT THE WATLINGTON 1435-36 ROLL BELONGED TO RAMSEY ABBEY.

I also cannot yet verify that it belonged to:
- Trussbutts/Colts;
- Kervile;
- Gawsells;
- West Dereham;
or another Watlington manor.

WHY THIS IS STILL A MAJOR RIGHTS DOCUMENT:
A combined "court baron and customary court" roll can potentially expose actual:
- freeholder suit;
- customary/copyhold tenants;
- admissions/surrenders;
- fines;
- rents;
- heriots;
- fealty;
- services;
- encroachments;
- commons;
- fold/customary agricultural incidents;
- ways;
- drainage;
- presentments;
- boundaries;
- manorial officers.

These are categories to test, NOT findings from the unread roll.

CURRENT PROBLEM:
The modern shelfmark/current repository reference has NOT been recovered.

PRIORITY:
Trace the old Chapter House inventory item into its modern TNA/other archive reference
using transfer/concordance records.

The first lines/headings of the roll should identify:
- the lord;
- manor style;
- steward;
- tenants;
and may immediately determine which Watlington stream it represents.

========================================================================
FA. EDWARD I-ERA WORMEGAY HONOUR ROLL — RENTS, SERVICES AND CUSTOMS TARGET
========================================================================

The same 1837 Public Records inventory records another exceptionally important source:

"Wormgay sive Wyrmegeye, honor"

and describes a:

LONG ROLL OF ELEVEN MEMBRANES,
written in French,
approximately reign of Edward I,

containing an account of:
- all knights' fees;
- manors;
- advowsons;
of John Lord Bardolph within the honour of Wormegay;
- by whom they were held;
- names of feoffees;
- subtenants;
- RENTS;
- SERVICES;
- CUSTOMS;
- quantities of holdings/lands.

SOURCE / DOWNLOAD:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/General_Report_to_the_King_in_Council_from_the_Honourable_Board_of_Commissioners_on_the_Public_Records_IA_dli.granth.75463.pdf

STATUS:
[Verified at historic Public Records inventory level.]

CURRENT SHELFMARK:
NOT RECOVERED IN PASS 12.

SIGNIFICANCE:
This may be one of the best surviving sources for reconstructing the superior tenure
immediately before the later Laurence/Thomas Trussbut fee lists.

It can potentially answer:
- which predecessor tenants held the Watlington fee(s);
- rents due upward to Wormegay;
- services/customs attached to each fee;
- subtenancies;
- whether a predecessor of the later Trussbut one-fee can be distinguished from the
quarter-fee and other Watlington holdings.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
It is a superior-honour survey/fee record, not automatically a Colts manorial custumal.

Nevertheless, if its fee descriptions can be matched to the 1390/1403/1427 Trussbut
entries, it could materially clarify which burdens and incidents followed the main
Trussbut fee.

PRIORITY:
Identify modern reference and inspect all Watlington/Shouldham/Tottenhill/Setchey/
Langham entries.

========================================================================
FB. 1329 — CASTLEWARD AND WAYTEFEE ARE VERIFIED WATLINGTON FEUDAL BURDENS
========================================================================

PASS 12 recovered a concrete class of medieval rights/burdens that had not previously
been separately tracked.

SOURCE-FINDER / CALENDAR REPRODUCTION:
https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/families/BardolfFamilyto1400.pdf

The Thomas Bardolf IPM material states that foreign tenants of the honour of Wormegay
held 13 1/8 knight's fees.

For each full fee they rendered at Wormegay:
- 2s 2d at the end of every 24 weeks, called "CASTELWARDE";
- 12d yearly, called "WAYTEFEE".

The same Norfolk fee schedule expressly applies Castelward and Waytefee to multiple
Watlington holdings, including:

1. THORPLAND, GAYTON AND WALYNGTON
messuage + 100 acres
Geoffrey de Eston
1 knight's fee
Castelward + Waytefee.

2. WATLINGTON AND LONGHAM
the MANOR
Geoffrey Bryseyard / Brisyerd
1 knight's fee
Castelward + Waytefee.

3. WATLINGTON, FOSTON, WALLINGTON, SETCHEY AND HERDWICK
300 acres
held by Benedict Russel, the Prioress of Blackborough,
Edmund de Mounpyncoun and tenants of Watlington
1 knight's fee
Castelward + Waytefee.

STATUS:
[Verified at edited/calendar reproduction level.]
The precise original membrane/TNA reference still needs to be captured from the
underlying CIPM volume.

WHAT THIS PROVES:
Actual medieval Watlington fee-holders within the Wormegay honour owed named financial/
feudal services:
- Castleward;
- Waytefee.

WHAT IT DOES NOT PROVE:
The evidence does NOT yet identify which 1329 Watlington fee is the predecessor of:
- Laurence Trussebute's 1403 main one-fee;
- Laurence's 1403 quarter-fee;
- Thomas Trusbut's 1427 main fee;
or
- Robert Kervyle's 1427 quarter-fee.

Therefore Castleward and Waytefee are:
VERIFIED HISTORIC WATLINGTON/WORMEGAY BURDENS,
but NOT yet verified as incidents of the specific Colts/Trussbutts submanor.

MODERN SURVIVAL:
The Tenures Abolition Act 1660 abolished tenure by knight-service and the charges
incident to knight-service and converted affected tenure into free and common socage.

OFFICIAL LEGISLATION ROUTE:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha2/12/24/contents

[Inference]
Because the 1329 source expressly states these payments were rendered in connection
with the knight's fees, they appear to belong to the medieval military-tenure framework
rather than to a modern freestanding proprietary right.

No present Watlington-West liability for Castleward or Waytefee is established.

========================================================================
FC. 1254 — FREE WARREN EXPRESSLY INCLUDED WATLINGTON AT SUPERIOR BARDOLF LEVEL
========================================================================

PASS 12 upgrades the previously tentative warren lead.

A calendar-derived Bardolf source records a royal charter dated:
19 July 1254, St Macaire

granting WILLIAM BARDOLF and his heirs:
FREE WARREN

in his demesne lands including:
- Wermegay;
- Westbrigg;
- Totenhill;
- WATLINGTON;
- Thorpe;
- Foston;
- Sechie;
and numerous other places.

DOWNLOADABLE SOURCE-FINDER:
https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/families/BardolfFamilyto1400.pdf

The same calendar material is independently exposed in modern roll indexing as a
charter granting free warren to William Bardolf in Watlingeton and the other listed
demesnes.

STATUS:
[Verified at calendar/secondary digital-edition level.]
The original Charter Roll membrane should still be recovered for the primary-image
archive.

RIGHTS SIGNIFICANCE:
There was a genuine medieval royal FREE-WARREN franchise over Bardolf demesne in
WATLINGTON by 1254.

CRITICAL COLTS LIMIT:
This is a right of William Bardolf at the superior lord/demesne level.

It is NOT yet proved that:
- the later Trussbut fee itself carried this franchise;
- Bardolf granted or delegated it to a Trussbut tenant;
- the right descended with the manor later styled Colts/Trussbutts;
- a severed warren right survives today.

Therefore:
FREE WARREN IN MEDIEVAL WATLINGTON = PROVED AT BARDOLF LEVEL.
FREE WARREN AS A RIGHT OF WATLINGTON-COLTS/TRUSSBUTTS = UNPROVED.

NEXT:
Recover the original 1254 charter/Charter Roll entry and compare the phrase "demesne
lands" with later subinfeudation and estate geography.

========================================================================
FD. 1441 — THE SUPERIOR WORMEGAY FRANCHISE BUNDLE IS EXPRESSLY RECORDED
========================================================================

RECORD:
William Phelipp, knight, Lord Bardolf
IPM 1441
E-CIPM 25-481

DIRECT DIGITAL EDITION:
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/25-481/483.html

William Phelipp and Joan held the honour and manor of Wormegay and associated manors
under Henry VI's letters patent, with:

- knights' fees;
- advowsons;
- escheats;
- WAIFS;
- STRAYS;
- SOC;
- TOLL;
- TEAM / THEMA;
- INFANGTHIEF;
- parks;
- mills;
- pastures;
- COURTS BARON;
- VIEWS OF FRANKPLEDGE;
- LEETS;
- wreck of sea;
- FAIRS;
- MARKETS;
- WARRENS;

as fully as Thomas, late Lord Bardolf, or his ancestors had held them.

STATUS:
[Verified via scholarly digital edition identifying the letters patent.]

THIS IS IMPORTANT — BUT IT IS AN UPPER-LEVEL RIGHTS BUNDLE.

It proves that these franchises existed in the superior WORMEGAY HONOUR estate.

It does NOT prove that every subordinate knight's fee or manor within the honour had
every one of those franchises.

COLTS CONSEQUENCE:
Do NOT add:
- waifs;
- strays;
- toll;
- infangthief;
- court leet;
- market;
- fair;
- warren;
or the other listed franchises
to the Watlington-Colts rights column merely because the Trussbut fee was held of
Wormegay.

Instead this bundle tells us exactly what to test for in:
- the 1435-36 Watlington court roll;
- the Edward I eleven-membrane fee/custom roll;
- HARE 2826;
- HARE 4056;
- HARE 2495;
- later Colt/Shouldham conveyances.

It defines the SUPERIOR FRANCHISE CEILING, not the Colts rights bundle.

========================================================================
FE. KERVILE — A SEPARATE WATLINGTON RENT STREAM SURVIVES INTO 1518
========================================================================

A transcribed PCC will adds an important warning to the 1506 16s-rent problem.

WILLIAM ELWYN OF WIGGENHALL
will dated 30 August 1517
probate 9 June 1518
PCC PROB 11/19/108

TRANSCRIPTION:
https://ibequeath.wordpress.com/2024/01/14/william-elwyn-1518-of-wiggenhall-norfolk/

The will gives to:

THOMAS KARVYLE THE YOUNGER

a RENT IN WATLYNGTON CALLED "PARLETTES",
subject to payment of the outgoing rents.

STATUS:
[Verified at modern transcription level with exact PCC reference.]
The original PROB 11/19/108 image should be checked before relying on paleographic
details.

SIGNIFICANCE:
The Kervile family already holds the separate Watlington quarter-fee in the 1427
Wormegay list.

By 1518 a younger Thomas Kervile is receiving a specifically named Watlington rent.

This makes it especially unsafe to assume that:
- any Watlington rent near 1500 belongs to Colts; or
- "Parlettes" is the 16s rent in the 1506 fine.

NO SUCH IDENTITY IS PROVED.

[Inference]
The Kervile evidence strengthens the probability that financially distinct Watlington
interests continued alongside one another into the Tudor period.

NEXT:
Obtain original PROB 11/19/108 and trace "Parlettes" through:
- Kervile wills;
- deeds;
- rentals;
- court rolls;
- later conveyances.

If Parlettes can be mapped, it may help exclude one Watlington rent stream from the
Colts investigation.

========================================================================
FF. PASS 12 — EFFECT ON THE 1435-36 COURT ROLL
========================================================================

The newly recovered court-roll inventory entry now sits between two crucial fee dates:

1403:
Laurence Trussebute holds BOTH:
- main Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey/Shouldham Thorpe/Langham fee;
- separate Watlington quarter-fee.

1427:
- Thomas Trusbut + parceners hold the main fee;
- Robert Kervyle holds the separate Watlington quarter-fee.

1435-36:
- "Watlington, manor. Roll of court baron and customary court."

Therefore the 1435-36 roll CANNOT be assigned from chronology alone.

The first priority on recovering it is to identify:
- named lord;
- steward;
- tenants;
- any Kervile / Trussbut / other surname;
- parcels;
- court style.

If it proves to be Thomas/William/John Trussbut's manor, it could be one of the single
most valuable documents yet located for the actual customs/rights of the Colts
predecessor.

If it proves to be Kervile or another Watlington manor, that is also valuable because it
removes another source of contamination.

========================================================================
FG. PASS 12 — RIGHTS-SURVIVAL EFFECT
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 12 EFFECT
-------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------

Court baron / customary court MAJOR NEW DIRECT RECORD LEAD.
An actual Watlington roll of 1435-36 is
inventoried. Manor/lord identity and modern
shelfmark remain unknown.

Free warren HISTORIC WATLINGTON FRANCHISE UPGRADED.
William Bardolf received free warren over
Watlington demesne in 1254.
Colts/subfee descent unproved.

Castleward NEW VERIFIED HISTORIC WATLINGTON BURDEN.
Exact Colts predecessor not identified.
No modern liability established.

Waytefee / watch-fee NEW VERIFIED HISTORIC WATLINGTON BURDEN.
Same limits as Castleward.

One free fold Still directly documented in 1506.
No new Pynkeney/Elizabeth -> Colts bridge.

16s rent Still directly documented in 1506.
Separate Kervile/Parlettes rent stream
strengthens the need for exact identity.

Advowson St Peter No new direct continuity bridge.

Waifs / strays Verified at superior Wormegay honour level
in 1441. NOT proved Colts rights.

Soc / toll / team / infangthief Verified at superior Wormegay honour level.
NOT proved Colts rights.

Court leet / frankpledge Verified at superior Wormegay honour level.
NOT proved for Colts without its court/deed.

Markets / fairs Verified within superior Wormegay franchise
bundle. No Colts grant/exercise proved.

Rents / services / customs Edward I eleven-membrane Wormegay roll is a
major new retrieval target.

Warren / sporting Medieval Bardolf free warren now genuine;
later Hare sporting reservation remains a
separate modern estate stream unless bridged.

Mines / minerals No new direct Colts evidence.

Commons / waste No new 1749 award recovered.

Present exercisable substantive
Watlington-West right NONE newly proved by PASS 12.

========================================================================
FH. PASS 12 — REVISED DECISIVE DOCUMENT ORDER
========================================================================

1. 1435-36 WATLINGTON COURT BARON + CUSTOMARY COURT ROLL
- identify current archive reference;
- recover image/full text;
- identify lord/manor stream;
- extract every custom, rent, service, fine, fold/common and court incident.

2. EDWARD I ELEVEN-MEMBRANE WORMEGAY HONOUR ROLL
- current shelfmark;
- all Watlington/Tottenhill/Shouldham/Setchey entries;
- subtenants, rents, services, customs;
- map predecessor fees into 1403/1427.

3. CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST / FORMER COLTS-TRUSSBUTTS CONVEYANCE
- rights;
- reservations;
- schedules;
- recited predecessor instruments.

4. NRO HARE 2826 — COMPLETE 1440-41 SHOULDHAM FIELD BOOK.

5. NRO HARE 4056 — CUSTUMAL / NATIVE TENANTS.

6. NRO HARE 4058 — WATLYNGTON/SHULDHAM RENT COLLECTOR ACCOUNT 1411-12.

7. PRE-1506 PYNKENEY / ELIZABETH TITLE.

8. HENRY WYATT 1537 IPM + WILL.

9. ORIGINAL 1581 / 1587 / 1596 COLT ASSURANCE SET.

10. NRO HARE 2495 — FULL 1633 COLTS FIELD BOOK.

11. ORIGINAL 1254 BARDOLF FREE-WARREN CHARTER / CHARTER ROLL ENTRY.

12. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP + CLAIMS.

13. ORIGINAL PROB 11/19/108 — WILLIAM ELWYN / PARLETTES RENT
+ Kervile successor papers.

14. FULL 1798 SHOULDHAM INCLOSURE SCHEDULE/AWARD/MAP.

15. D/HH 8/2/86 — EDLESTON MANORS/ADVOWSONS c.1930.

16. ALLEGED 1929 HUMPHREYS -> EDLESTON COLTS CONVEYANCE.

17. ACTUAL 1943 HARE ESTATE -> FORESTRY COMMISSION LEASE
+ all variations/assignments.

18. 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN LEASE.

19. HMLR MANORIAL/FRANCHISE INDEX + CURRENT/HISTORIC PARCEL TITLES
+ filed deeds + former-copyhold/enfranchisement records.

========================================================================
FI. PASS 12 — NEW / UPDATED SOURCE URL LEDGER
========================================================================

NEW OR NEWLY PROMOTED:

1. 1837 PUBLIC RECORDS REPORT / CHAPTER HOUSE INVENTORY
Contains:
- Watlington court baron/customary court roll, 14 Hen VI;
- Wormegay 11-membrane Edward I-era fee/manor/advowson/rent/service/custom roll.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/General_Report_to_the_King_in_Council_from_the_Honourable_Board_of_Commissioners_on_the_Public_Records_IA_dli.granth.75463.pdf

2. AGNES BARDOLF IPM — 1403
Laurence Trussebute simultaneously on the main one-fee and separate Watlington 1/4 fee.
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/18-789/791.html

3. THOMAS DUKE OF EXETER IPM — 1427
Thomas Trusbut on main fee; Robert Kervyle on separate Watlington 1/4 fee.
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/22-791/794.html

4. WILLIAM PHELIPP / LORD BARDOLF IPM — 1441
Superior Wormegay franchise bundle.
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/25-481/483.html

5. WILLIAM ELWYN WILL TRANSCRIPTION — PROB 11/19/108
Kervile receives "Rent in Watlyngton called Parlettes".
https://ibequeath.wordpress.com/2024/01/14/william-elwyn-1518-of-wiggenhall-norfolk/

6. TENURES ABOLITION ACT 1660
Official legislation route:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Cha2/12/24/contents

UPDATED:
- BardolfFamilyto1400 PDF row now records:
- 1254 free-warren charter including Watlington;
- 1329 Castelward/Waytefee Watlington burden evidence;
- 1403 dual Laurence Trussebute fee interests.
- 1427 IPM row now expressly records the main Trusbut fee / Kervile quarter-fee split.

========================================================================
FJ. PASS 12 — NEGATIVE SEARCH / NO FALSE CLOSURE
========================================================================

PASS 12 did NOT recover:

1. modern shelfmark/current repository reference for the 1435-36 Watlington court roll;
2. modern shelfmark for the Edward I eleven-membrane Wormegay roll;
3. a full image/transcription of either old Chapter House item;
4. proof that the 1435-36 court roll is Colts/Trussbutts;
5. proof that the 1329 Castleward/Waytefee holding is the later main Trussbut fee;
6. proof that Bardolf's 1254 free warren descended to the Trussbut submanor;
7. a Trussbut grant/delegation of waifs, strays, market, fair, toll, leet or other
superior Wormegay franchise;
8. the Pynkeney/Elizabeth pre-1506 bridge;
9. the Henry Wyatt forward bridge;
10. the original 1581/1587/1596 Colt assurance;
11. the full 1749 Watlington award;
12. a direct Colts mineral reservation;
13. a direct present-day Colts sporting/warren title.

These remain unresolved, not disproved.

========================================================================
FK. PASS 12 — WHAT WAS ACTUALLY LEARNED
========================================================================

1. Laurence Trussebute held TWO distinct Watlington-linked Wormegay fee interests in
1403, not one.

2. By 1427:
- Thomas Trusbut + parceners held the main multi-place fee;
- Robert Kervyle held the separate Watlington quarter-fee.

3. This is a major stream-separation tool and prevents generic "Trussbut + Watlington"
records from being silently assigned to Colts.

4. A real Watlington MANOR court baron and customary court roll survives in the historic
record inventory for 1435-36. Its modern reference and manor identity remain missing.

5. The old Public Records inventory also identifies an Edward I-era eleven-membrane
Wormegay honour roll containing subtenants, rents, services and customs. This could be
decisive for reconstructing the obligations of the predecessor fees.

6. Castleward and Waytefee are now verified historic obligations on several medieval
Watlington/Wormegay fee holdings.

7. They are not yet proved specifically against the Colts predecessor; no current
Watlington-West liability is established.

8. William Bardolf had a royal free-warren charter in 1254 expressly including
Watlington among his demesne lands.

9. That proves medieval free warren in Watlington at the Bardolf superior level, but
does not prove the later Trussbut/Colts submanor inherited the franchise.

10. The 1441 Phelipp IPM gives an express superior Wormegay franchise bundle including
waifs, strays, soc, toll, team, infangthief, courts baron, frankpledge, leets,
fairs, markets and warrens.

11. These superior franchises are now recorded as TEST TARGETS, not as Colts rights.

12. The Kervile stream continues to generate distinct Watlington financial interests:
in 1518 Thomas Kervile the younger receives "Rent in Watlyngton called Parlettes".
It must not be equated with the 1506 16s rent without proof.

13. No new presently exercisable substantive right of Watlington-West is established
in PASS 12.

END OF PASS 12 ADDITION
END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
========================================================================
FL. PASS 13 — BRINGING THE RIGHTS ANALYSIS INTO THE CURRENT PERIOD
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 13 deliberately shifts the centre of gravity from medieval discovery to:
HISTORIC RIGHT -> 1597 TITLE -> ENCLOSURE -> 1926 PROPERTY REFORM ->
1930 CONVEYANCE -> 1952-1977 ESTATE ADMINISTRATION -> 2013 LAND-REGISTRATION
PRIORITY -> 2017 SUCCESSION -> CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST TRANSFER.

CURRENT WORKING ENDPOINT:
Watlington-West.

HISTORICAL MANOR:
Watlington Coltes / Watlington Colts / Watlington Trusbuttes / Trussbutts.

The question is no longer merely:
"What rights did the manor have?"

It is now:
"Which right can be proved to have belonged to this particular manor, survived every
legal/severance event, passed into the modern Edleston/Holmes chain, retained priority
against the burdened land, and was included in the present transfer?"

No currently exercisable substantive right is yet proved through ALL of those gates.

However, PASS 13 materially narrows the rights that COULD realistically reach the
current period and identifies the exact documents capable of proving them.

========================================================================
FM. MAJOR CORRECTION — THE 1587/1597 OPERATIVE COLT -> SHOULDHAM TITLE SET EXISTS
========================================================================

Earlier cumulative passes repeatedly retained the "1587/1596 instrument" as missing.

That is now superseded by evidence already recovered in the project's earlier evidence
ledger and promoted into this cumulative rights handover.

1. 30 SEPTEMBER 1587 — HARE 4065
---------------------------------
NRO HARE 4065

George Colt of Cavendish covenanted with Thomas Shouldham and Roger Bell to:
- levy a fine;
- suffer a recovery;
of property including:
- Totteshall;
- WATLYNGTON ALIAS WATLYNGTON COLTES;
- Shouldham;
with associated property.

OFFICIAL CATALOGUE URL:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/indenture-covenant-to-levy-a-fine-and-suffer-a-recovery

IMPORTANT:
This is a recovery covenant, not itself the final completed bargain and sale.

2. 17 MARCH 1597 — HARE 2402
-----------------------------
NRO HARE 2402

Actual bargain and sale by GEORGE COLT to THOMAS SCHULD(H)AM / SHOULDHAM including:

- Tittleshall/Tyteshall Hall with appurtenances;
- THE MANOR OF WATLINGTON COLTES OR WATLINGTON TRUSBUTTES
WITH APPURTENANCES IN WATLYNGTON;
- Colt's messuages, lands and tenements in:
Runcton Holme;
Thorpland;
Watlington;
Tottenhill;
Setchey;
the Wiggenhalls;
Terrington;
Marshland.

OFFICIAL CATALOGUE URL:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/indenture-bargain-and-sale-44

The catalogue notes:
- seal;
- "Not enrolled."

STATUS:
[Verified in the project's prior evidence ledger from the NRO catalogue description.]

THIS IS NOW THE KEY LATE-ELIZABETHAN TITLE ANCHOR.

The old generic "1596 sale still missing" formulation is superseded.

3. 20 OCTOBER 1597 — HARE 2403
-------------------------------
NRO HARE 2403

Exemplification of Thomas Shuldham's title to:
- Tittleshall;
- Watlyngton / Watlyngton Coltes;
- Shouldham;
and associated property.

MOST IMPORTANT RIGHTS WORDING:

The archive description includes a:

LIBERTY OF A FOLD

in:
- Watlyngton;
- Holme;
- Wallington;
- Rowghton;
- Marham;
- Shouldham;
- Garboysthorpe;
- Fyncheham;
- Bartonbendishe;
- Stowbardolffe;
- Totnell.

OFFICIAL CATALOGUE URL:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/exemplification-of-title-thomas-shuldham-gent

STATUS:
[Verified in the project's prior evidence ledger from the NRO catalogue description.]

CRITICAL LIMIT:
HARE 2403 bundles multiple manors.

Therefore it proves:
- a fold liberty existed in the BUNDLED title package;
- Watlyngton is expressly one of the places in which the liberty operated.

It does NOT, from catalogue wording alone, prove:
- that the whole multi-parish fold liberty was exclusively an incident of Watlington Colts;
- that every listed local fold was one legal franchise;
- that the liberty survived enclosure or the twentieth-century reforms.

RIGHTS EFFECT:
The historic fold evidence is now materially stronger than the isolated 1506 free-fold
problem.

We have:
1506 — one free fold in a Watlyngton fine whose Colts identity still needs bridging;
1597 — Watlington Coltes / Trusbuttes is expressly named in the operative title chain,
followed by an exemplification containing a liberty of a fold in Watlyngton.

This substantially strengthens the HISTORIC existence case.

The modern survival case remains separate.

========================================================================
FN. 12 FEBRUARY 1930 — THE MODERN RIGHTS GATEWAY
========================================================================

The public 2025 sales narrative says Mary Humphreys sold the manor to Robert Holmes
Edleston in "1929".

The project's supplied lawyers/title chronology gives the operative date as:

12 FEBRUARY 1930

MARY RHODA SPOONER HUMPHREYS
->
ROBERT HOLMES EDLESTON

for WATLINGTON COLTS.

STATUS:
[User-supplied lawyers/title chronology]
[Exact deed image/text still not inspected in this pass.]

The 1930 date matters enormously because the conveyance falls after commencement of the
Law of Property Act 1925.

LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 — SECTION 62(3)
----------------------------------------

The Act provides that a conveyance of a MANOR is deemed to convey with the manor
existing/reputed appurtenances including categories such as:

- pastures/feedings;
- wastes;
- warrens;
- commons;
- mines;
- minerals;
- quarries;
- woods;
- fisheries/fowlings;
- courts;
- customs;
- tolls/duties;
- reliefs;
- heriots;
- fines;
- waifs/estrays;
- chief rents / quit rents and other rents;
- services;
- royalties;
- jurisdictions;
- franchises;
- liberties;
- privileges;
- easements;
- profits;
- advantages;
- rights and hereditaments;

where they appertained/reputedly appertained to, or were then enjoyed with, the manor.

The subsection also expressly treats the RIGHT TO COMPENSATION FOR MANORIAL INCIDENTS
on their extinguishment as a right appertaining to the manor.

SECTION 62(4):
The statutory implication operates only insofar as a contrary intention is not expressed
in the conveyance and is subject to the terms of the conveyance.

OFFICIAL STATUTE:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/pdfs/ukpga_19250020_en.pdf

[Inference]
IF the 12 February 1930 instrument:
1. actually conveyed "the Manor of Watlington Colts" rather than merely a bare nominal
title described differently;
2. did not express a contrary intention excluding rights;
3. and a substantive right still legally belonged/reputedly belonged to or was enjoyed
with the manor at that date;

then section 62(3) is potentially the strongest statutory mechanism yet identified for
carrying that right into Robert Holmes Edleston's ownership.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
Section 62(3) does NOT:
- create a right that never existed;
- restore a right already extinguished;
- restore a right already severed from the manor;
- give the purchaser a better title than the vendor had;
- cure an enclosure award that had already converted/extinguished the right;
- cure later priority loss against registered land.

Therefore the ACTUAL 12 FEBRUARY 1930 CONVEYANCE is now one of the most important
documents in the entire project.

EXTRACT FROM IT:
- exact premises clause;
- whether "Manor of Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts" is used;
- "together with" / general words clause;
- express rights;
- exceptions and reservations;
- mines/minerals;
- sporting/game;
- wastes/commons;
- rents;
- fold/foldcourse;
- franchises;
- rights of entry;
- compensation rights;
- parcels/maps;
- title deeds delivered;
- prior conveyance recitals.

========================================================================
FO. WHAT COULD STILL LEGALLY SURVIVE AFTER THE 1922-1925 REFORMS
========================================================================

HM LAND REGISTRY PRACTICE GUIDE 66 states that "manorial rights" for the modern
land-registration regime are narrower than the very broad general words in
Law of Property Act 1925 s.62(3).

The preserved categories identified from Schedule 12 to the Law of Property Act 1922
include:

1. MINES AND MINERALS
2. LIMESTONE / LIME / CLAY / STONE / GRAVEL
3. PITS / QUARRIES
4. ENTRY / WAY / SEARCH AND WORKING RIGHTS ancillary to minerals/quarries
5. FAIRS / MARKETS
6. CHASE / WARREN
7. PISCARIES
8. HUNTING / SHOOTING / FISHING / FOWLING / TAKING GAME, FISH OR FOWL
9. CERTAIN LIABILITIES concerning construction, maintenance and repair of
dykes, ditches, canals and other works.

OFFICIAL HMLR SOURCE:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013/practice-guide-66-overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013

HM LAND REGISTRY PRACTICE GUIDE 22 similarly identifies the principal surviving
modern categories as:
- sporting;
- mines/minerals;
- fairs/markets;
- certain works liabilities.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/manors/practice-guide-22-manors

CURRENT PROJECT CONSEQUENCE:
The investigation should no longer give equal present-day weight to every medieval
incident.

The highest-value current-survival targets are now:

TIER 1 — LEGALLY CAPABLE + POTENTIALLY VALUABLE
- mines/minerals;
- stone/clay/gravel/quarry;
- ancillary entry/search/working rights;
- sporting rights;
- chase/warren;
- piscary;
- market/fair franchise;
- certain drainage/work liabilities;
- residual physical manorial land/waste, but as LAND OWNERSHIP rather than automatically
as an incorporeal manorial right.

TIER 2 — HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT BUT MODERN SURVIVAL REQUIRES A DIFFERENT LEGAL ROUTE
- fold/foldcourse;
- 16s rent;
- commons;
- roads/easements;
- timber;
- physical Colts Farm/capital messuage.

TIER 3 — NOT A PRESENT EXERCISABLE FEUDAL/MANORIAL POWER
- court baron judicial function;
- court leet/frankpledge jurisdiction;
- heriots;
- copyhold admissions/surrenders;
- customary fines/reliefs;
- fealty/suit;
- Castleward;
- Waytefee.

TIER 4 — SEPARATE ECCLESIASTICAL STREAM
- advowson/patronage.

========================================================================
FP. 1597 FOLD LIBERTY -> CURRENT PERIOD
========================================================================

HISTORIC:
HARE 2403 materially strengthens the historic fold-right case.

MODERN LEGAL PROBLEM:
A fold liberty/foldcourse is NOT expressly one of the narrow Schedule 12 categories
listed by HMLR PG66.

[Inference]
That does not necessarily mean every proprietary consequence of a historic fold was
automatically destroyed.

For a fold-related interest to matter now we would need to show, for example, that it
was transformed before the twentieth-century reforms into:
- an identifiable property right;
- an easement;
- a profit;
- ownership of land/waste;
- a reservation in an enclosure award;
- a covenant or expressly retained right;
rather than merely surviving as an obsolete customary manorial incident.

DECISIVE DOCUMENTS:
1. HARE 2403 full original/exemplification;
2. 1749 Watlington inclosure award/map;
3. later Hare/Plestow/Coote conveyances;
4. c.1900 exchange plans/deeds;
5. 12 February 1930 conveyance.

CURRENT ASSESSMENT:
HISTORIC FOLD LIBERTY — STRONGLY EVIDENCED.
PRESENT WATLINGTON-WEST FOLD RIGHT — NOT YET PROVED.

========================================================================
FQ. 1930 -> 1977 — THE MODERN ESTATE TRANSMISSION CHAIN
========================================================================

The supplied lawyers/title chronology presently records:

12 FEB 1930
MARY RHODA SPOONER HUMPHREYS
->
ROBERT HOLMES EDLESTON
Conveyance of Watlington Colts.

30 NOV 1952
Robert Holmes Edleston dies.

16 SEP 1953
Sarah Cumming Edleston receives Letters of Administration to Robert's estate.

IMPORTANT:
Administration authority is not the same thing as beneficial ownership.

24 JAN 1956
Sarah Cumming Edleston dies.
The supplied chronology records the manor as remaining incompletely administered.

31 MAY 1966
Eric Richard Hanby Holmes obtains Letters of Administration to Robert Holmes
Edleston's estate.

CAUTION:
The exact grant should be transcribed before its technical probate classification is
stated beyond the supplied chronology.

21 DEC 1977
The supplied chronology records:
A. an assent by Eric Richard Hanby Holmes to himself; and
B. a separate vesting assent thereafter to Richard John Hanby Holmes.

These two transactions must not be collapsed.

CURRENT RIGHTS SIGNIFICANCE:
If substantive rights passed into Robert's ownership in 1930 and were still part of his
unadministered estate, the 1953/1966 administration history and 1977 assents become the
next modern devolution instruments which must be inspected.

The exact words "all rights", "appurtenances", "manorial rights", "mines and minerals",
"franchises", "rights and privileges", or specific exceptions/reservations in the 1977
assents are potentially decisive.

========================================================================
FR. EDLESTON/HANBY HOLMES ARCHIVE — WHY D/HH 8/2/86 IS NOW CRITICAL
========================================================================

DURHAM RECORD OFFICE
HANBY HOLMES COLLECTION

D/HH 8/2/86
"Details of R.H. Edleston, his manors, advowsons etc."
n.d. [c.1930]
1 paper, typescript.

CATALOGUE:
https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=

The same archive series shows that Edleston/Hanby Holmes were actively dealing with:
- purchase of manorial rights;
- extinguishment of manorial incidents;
- schedules of extinguished incidents;
during the 1920s-1940s in other manors.

Examples in the catalogue:
D/HH 8/2/52-83:
correspondence concerning Edleston's purchase of manorial rights and manorial matters,
1924-1928.

D/HH 8/2/84:
schedule of tenants whose manorial incidents had been extinguished since Edleston's
representatives purchased Chesterton, 1930s.

D/HH 8/2/85:
1942 Hanby Holmes letter concerning extinguishment of incidents.

SIGNIFICANCE:
This family/solicitor archive was operating with full awareness of the post-1925
distinction between:
- title;
- manorial rights;
- extinguished incidents.

Therefore D/HH 8/2/86 is not merely biographical curiosity.

It may be the closest surviving c.1930 summary of WHAT R.H. EDLESTON BELIEVED HE OWNED.

PRIORITY REQUEST:
Inspect D/HH 8/2/86 for:
- Watlington;
- Watlington Colts;
- Trusbutts;
- Gawsells;
- West Dereham;
- Tottenhill;
- Shouldham;
- advowsons;
- rents;
- minerals;
- sporting;
- franchises;
- manorial incidents;
- purchase dates.

========================================================================
FS. PRE-1926 SEVERANCE GATE — HARE / HOFF EXCHANGE PAPERS
========================================================================

NRO HARE 6956/1-5
c.1900

6-inch Ordnance Survey sheets covering:
- Shouldham;
- Shouldham Thorpe;
- Marham;
- Wormegay;
marked for exchange between HARE and HOFF.

TNA/NRO DISCOVERY:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/c587d73c-e321-4732-afc5-dce032497f69

RELATED:
HARE 6374-5.

SIGNIFICANCE FOR MODERN RIGHTS:
Any right severed, exchanged or expressly reserved around 1900 would NOT automatically
return to the manor under the 1930 conveyance.

These plans/deeds therefore sit immediately before the great 1926 legal reform and can
answer:
- what land remained with the Hare estate;
- whether Colts Farm/parcels remained estate land;
- whether sporting/mineral/timber rights were reserved;
- whether the lordship had already become separated from physical property.

This is a key "pre-modern severance gate".

========================================================================
FT. 2013 — THE LAND-REGISTRATION PRIORITY GATE
========================================================================

Even if a genuine manorial right survived 1926 and passed under the 1930/1977 chain,
the modern inquiry is not finished.

HM Land Registry states:

- manorial rights lost overriding status after 12 October 2013;
- failure to protect a valid right by notice/caution before 13 October 2013 did NOT
automatically extinguish the right;
- but priority can later be lost.

For land registered BEFORE 13 October 2013:
an unprotected manorial right can remain binding until a purchaser for valuable
consideration acquires the registered estate by registrable disposition after
12 October 2013; such purchaser can then take free of the unprotected interest.

For land first registered AFTER 12 October 2013:
the estate may be registered free of an unprotected manorial right unless protected at
first registration.

HMLR:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/manors/practice-guide-22-manors

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013/practice-guide-66-overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013

CURRENT CONSEQUENCE:
For EVERY candidate right we ultimately prove, we need the burdened modern parcel(s).

Then obtain:
- current register;
- historical register editions where necessary;
- filed deeds;
- notices/restrictions;
- date of post-12-Oct-2013 dispositions for value;
- first-registration date.

A transfer of the LORDSHIP itself after 2013 does NOT restore priority lost against the
burdened land.

This is parcel-by-parcel work.

========================================================================
FU. 2016 -> 2017 -> CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST ENDPOINT
========================================================================

The supplied legal chronology records:

20 NOVEMBER 2016:
Richard John Hanby Holmes dies.

22 MAY 2017:
Olivia Mary Holmes is grantee of probate / personal representative.

IMPORTANT:
A probate grant alone does not establish that Olivia beneficially acquired the lordship.
The will / assent / transfer must support that step.

The current supplied title-chain record then identifies:

OLIVIA MARY HOLMES
->
WILLIAM JAMES DALRYMPLE BEDDING FANSHAWE WEST
Present holder,
styled in the supplied record:
LORD OF WATLINGTON-WEST NORFOLK.

STATUS:
[Current endpoint supplied by the user's title-chain record.]

CRITICAL PRESENT-RIGHTS LIMIT:
The current endpoint establishes the project endpoint for the lordship/title chain.

It does NOT, by itself, establish that any of the historic substantive rights passed.

The public 2025 sale particulars themselves did not expressly state that the Watlington
Colts lot included:
- minerals;
- sporting rights;
- market franchise;
- warren;
- 16s rent;
- free fold;
- fishery;
- waste;
- rights of entry.

The seller's general terms warn that:
- a vendor may retain rights;
- a sale may be title-only;
- operative rights require separate legal establishment.

Therefore the CURRENT TRANSFER DOCUMENT is the final conveyancing gate.

It must be compared word-for-word with:
- 1930 conveyance;
- 1977 assents;
- any Holmes/Olivia assent/deed;
- all rights reservations.

========================================================================
FV. PRESENT-DAY RIGHTS MATRIX — WHERE WE NOW STAND
========================================================================

RIGHT / INTEREST HISTORIC CASE CAN SURVIVE IN LAW? CURRENT COLTS/WEST PROOF
----------------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------------

Lordship/title strong yes, separately Current endpoint supplied;
operative present deed still
needed for exact scope.

Physical Colts land / waste historic land strong yes as ordinary land Modern parcel ownership
not proved.

Minerals no direct Colts deed YES NOT PROVED.
yet HIGH PRIORITY.

Stone/clay/gravel/quarries no direct Colts deed YES NOT PROVED.
yet

Mineral entry/search/working no direct Colts deed YES NOT PROVED.
rights yet

Sporting/shooting modern Hare Estate YES Real wider-estate stream;
reservation exists no Colts bridge/current owner.

Free warren 1254 Bardolf superior YES as category Colts descent/current
franchise ownership not proved.

Piscary/fishing wider Shouldham YES as category Colts stream not proved.
evidence only

Market/fair superior/Shouldham YES as category Colts ownership not proved.
evidence

Certain dyke/ditch/work historic enclosure YES as category Colts parcel/liability
liabilities context not proved.

Fold liberty 1597 bundled title UNCERTAIN / Historic case strengthened;
now strong requires separate modern right not proved.
proprietary route

16s rent direct 1506 possible only if identity + survival +
surviving as valid devolution unproved.
property interest

Commons historic/enclosure possible as separate no present Colts proof.
rights/land interests

Advowson direct 1506 historic separate church-law NOT a saleable manorial
regime appurtenance today.

Court baron / leet jurisdiction historic NO meaningful modern not exercisable.
feudal jurisdiction

Heriots / fines / copyhold historic categories extinguished/ not present privileges.
incidents compensated regime

Castleward / Waytefee medieval burden obsolete knight-service no current liability.

Timber Hare estate evidence ordinary property/ no Colts right proved.
reservation possible

========================================================================
FW. THE CURRENT-PERIOD PROOF TEST — SIX GATES
========================================================================

A substantive Watlington-West right should not be claimed until it passes ALL relevant
gates:

GATE 1 — PARTICULAR MANOR
Was the right actually Watlington Coltes/Trusbutts rather than:
Kervile, Gawsells, Priory, West Dereham, superior Wormegay, or wider Hare estate?

GATE 2 — HISTORIC CONTINUITY
Can the right be followed through the 1597 title and later estate?

GATE 3 — ENCLOSURE / ENFRANCHISEMENT / 1926 REFORM
Was it reserved, transformed, compensated or extinguished?

GATE 4 — 12 FEB 1930 CONVEYANCE
Did Humphreys have it?
Did the conveyance include it under express words or LPA 1925 s.62(3)?
Was there a contrary intention/reservation?

GATE 5 — EDLESTON/HOLMES DEVOLUTION
Did it remain in Robert's estate and pass through the 1977 assents and later succession?

GATE 6 — 2013 PRIORITY + CURRENT TRANSFER
For rights burdening land:
was priority preserved against today's registered parcel?
Did the present transfer include the benefit?

Only after Gate 6 is passed should a right be labelled:
CURRENTLY OWNED / EXERCISABLE BY WATLINGTON-WEST.

========================================================================
FX. PASS 13 — CURRENT-PERIOD DOCUMENT PRIORITY
========================================================================

PRIORITY 1:
ACTUAL 12 FEBRUARY 1930 HUMPHREYS -> EDLESTON CONVEYANCE.

PRIORITY 2:
CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST / FORMER WATLINGTON COLTS TRANSFER DOCUMENT.

PRIORITY 3:
21 DECEMBER 1977 ASSENT(S):
- Eric Hanby Holmes assent to himself;
- vesting assent to Richard John Hanby Holmes.

PRIORITY 4:
2016/2017 HOLMES WILL / PROBATE / ASSENT OR TRANSFER establishing beneficial devolution
to Olivia Mary Holmes.

PRIORITY 5:
D/HH 8/2/86
R.H. Edleston's c.1930 manors/advowsons schedule.

PRIORITY 6:
HARE 6374-5 + HARE 6956/1-5
c.1900 exchange/severance papers.

PRIORITY 7:
FULL 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP.

PRIORITY 8:
HMLR INDEX OF RELATING FRANCHISES AND MANORS SEARCH
for Watlington / Colts / Trussbutts variants.

PG13:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/official-searches-of-the-index-of-relating-franchises-and-manors/practice-guide-13-official-searches-of-the-index-of-relating-franchises-and-manors

PRIORITY 9:
HMLR INDEX MAP / SIM + current/historic registers for likely:
- Colts Farm;
- residual waste;
- known former estate parcels;
- Shouldham Sincks;
- parcels affected by any proven mineral/sporting/warren right.

PRIORITY 10:
HARE 2402 + HARE 2403 ORIGINALS
to extract the complete 1597 rights language, not only catalogue abstracts.

========================================================================
FY. PASS 13 — CURRENT LEGAL BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

[Inference]

We can now see a plausible legal route from the historic manor into the modern period:

1597
WATLINGTON COLTES / TRUSBUTTES explicitly conveyed
+ bundled title exemplification includes fold liberty
|
v
later estate descent / possible severances
|
v
1749 ENCLOSURE
major transformation gate
|
v
c.1900 HARE/HOFF exchanges
possible severance/reservation gate
|
v
1926 PROPERTY REFORM
ordinary copyhold/manorial incidents cease or become compensation matters;
narrow Schedule-12 categories can survive
|
v
12 FEB 1930 HUMPHREYS -> EDLESTON
LPA 1925 s.62(3) potentially sweeps surviving appurtenant rights with the manor
unless excluded
|
v
1952-1977 estate administration / assents
|
v
RICHARD JOHN HANBY HOLMES
|
v
2016 death / 2017 probate and later devolution
|
v
OLIVIA MARY HOLMES
|
v
CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST HOLDER

But the present substantive-right package is NOT established simply by completing this
ownership chain.

The highest-value modern candidates remain:
1. minerals/quarries + ancillary entry/search rights;
2. sporting / chase / warren;
3. market/fair franchise;
4. piscary;
5. certain drainage/work liabilities;
6. residual physical manorial waste/land.

The historically strongest distinctive Colts candidate remains:
FOLD / FOLD LIBERTY,
now strengthened materially by HARE 2403.

But its current survival requires a different proof route because fold liberty is not
one of the narrow modern Schedule-12 categories expressly listed by HMLR.

========================================================================
FZ. PASS 13 — NEW / UPDATED SOURCE URL LEDGER
========================================================================

PROMOTED FROM EARLIER PROJECT EVIDENCE:

HARE 4065 — 1587 recovery covenant:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/indenture-covenant-to-levy-a-fine-and-suffer-a-recovery

HARE 2402 — 1597 bargain and sale:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/indenture-bargain-and-sale-44

HARE 2403 — 1597 title exemplification / fold liberty:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/exemplification-of-title-thomas-shuldham-gent

NEW / UPGRADED MODERN LEGAL SOURCES:

Law of Property Act 1925:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/pdfs/ukpga_19250020_en.pdf

HMLR PG22:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/manors/practice-guide-22-manors

HMLR PG66:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013/practice-guide-66-overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013

Patronage (Benefices) Measure 1986:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukcm/1986/3/pdfs/ukcm_19860003_en.pdf

TNA manorial-documents legal background:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/other-archival-legislation/manorial-documents/

D/HH 8/2/86:
https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=

HARE 6956/1-5:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/c587d73c-e321-4732-afc5-dce032497f69

========================================================================
GA. PASS 13 — WHAT WAS ACTUALLY LEARNED
========================================================================

1. The late-sixteenth-century operative title gap is much smaller than the cumulative
handover previously stated:
HARE 4065, HARE 2402 and HARE 2403 give a real 1587/1597 assurance set.

2. HARE 2402 explicitly names:
"the manor of Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes".

3. HARE 2403 gives a real fold-liberty clause operating in Watlyngton within the bundled
title package.

4. This materially upgrades the historic fold case.

5. The project's exact modern acquisition date is 12 February 1930 in the supplied legal
chronology, although the public sales narrative says 1929.

6. That exact date makes LPA 1925 s.62(3) a critical modern continuity mechanism:
surviving appurtenant/reputed appurtenant rights could pass with a conveyance of the
manor unless excluded.

7. Section 62 cannot resurrect rights which had already been extinguished or severed.

8. The modern legally survivable manorial-right shortlist is now sharply narrowed by
HMLR PG66 to minerals/quarries and working rights, fairs/markets, chase/warren,
piscary, sporting rights and certain works liabilities.

9. The 1930 deed is therefore not a routine title-chain document: it is the principal
bridge between historic rights and the Edleston/Holmes modern chain.

10. D/HH 8/2/86 is elevated because it is a c.1930 summary of Edleston's manors,
advowsons etc., created in the same solicitor/family archive that demonstrably dealt
with extinguishment of manorial incidents.

11. The c.1900 Hare/Hoff exchanges are a key possible severance event BEFORE both 1926
reform and the 1930 conveyance.

12. After 12 October 2013, even a valid surviving manorial right requires parcel-level
priority analysis against registered land.

13. The current title endpoint supplied by the user is Watlington-West, but the public
2025 sale particulars do not establish a current substantive rights package.

14. NO substantive right is yet proved all the way through:
historic Colts ownership -> statutory survival -> 1930 conveyance -> Holmes chain ->
2013 priority -> present transfer.

15. We are now genuinely at the current-period proof stage rather than merely building
medieval context.

END OF PASS 13 ADDITION
END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
========================================================================
GB. PASS 14 — CURRENT-PERIOD PROOF: OFFICIAL SEARCH ROUTES + 1920s OWNER LIST
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 14 continues PASS 13's modern-rights focus.

The research is now operating at two levels simultaneously:

A. BENEFIT / TITLE SIDE
What right, if any, was still owned with Watlington Colts in 1930 and passed through
Edleston -> Holmes -> current Watlington-West?

B. BURDENED-LAND / PRIORITY SIDE
What modern parcel, if any, is still legally burdened by that right after registration
and the 12 October 2013 priority changes?

No current substantive Watlington-West right is yet proved through both sides.

========================================================================
GC. NEW NEAR-MODERN OFFICIAL SOURCE — TNA HMC 5/6-8
========================================================================

The National Archives now supplies an especially important lead for the period immediately
before the Humphreys -> Edleston conveyance.

TNA explains that after the Law of Property (Amendment) Act 1924 and the creation of the
Manorial Documents Committee:

- the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries supplied information from its Copyhold Acts files;
- the Chief Inspector of Inland Revenue obtained similar information from local tax inspectors;
- these returns included lists of MANORS and DETAILS OF OWNERSHIP OF TITLE;
- the returns are preserved as:

TNA HMC 5/6-8.

OFFICIAL SOURCES:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/manors

https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archives-sector/legislation/historical-and-legislative-background/

https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/manorial-documents-lordships-how-to-use-manorial-document-register/

TNA CAUTION:
The lists were NOT intended as a complete register of all manors or all owners.

STATUS:
[Verified from The National Archives.]

WHY THIS IS MAJOR:
These lists are essentially an official government snapshot of known manors/title owners
in the 1920s.

That is exactly the period immediately before:

12 FEBRUARY 1930
MARY RHODA SPOONER HUMPHREYS
->
ROBERT HOLMES EDLESTON

If Watlington Colts / Trussbutts appears in HMC 5/6-8 under:
- Mary Humphreys;
- George Coote's estate/successor;
or another identified owner,

it would independently anchor:
1. the manor's existence under an official 1920s administrative return;
2. the pre-1930 owner or title claimant;
3. the title style immediately before Edleston;
4. potentially the address/custodian/document trail which can be followed into HMC 5
correspondence.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
HMC 5/6-8 is not itself a conclusive register of title.

It is an unusually valuable official corroborative source and source-finder.

NEW PRIORITY:
Inspect HMC 5/6, HMC 5/7 and HMC 5/8 for:
- Watlington;
- Watlington Colts;
- Watlington Coltes;
- Watlington Trussbutts / Trusbuttes;
- Shouldham;
- Coote;
- Humphreys;
- Plestow;
- Hare;
then follow any linked HMC 5 correspondence.

========================================================================
GD. HMLR — EXACT CURRENT SEARCH ROUTE FOR THE LORDSHIP / FRANCHISE SIDE
========================================================================

HM Land Registry Practice Guide 13 confirms that HMLR maintains:

THE INDEX OF RELATING FRANCHISES AND MANORS.

It contains, among other categories:
- registered manors;
- registered relating franchises;
- pending first-registration applications for relating franchises;
- cautions against first registration relating to franchises.

OFFICIAL GUIDE:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/official-searches-of-the-index-of-relating-franchises-and-manors/practice-guide-13-official-searches-of-the-index-of-relating-franchises-and-manors

CRITICAL PROCEDURAL POINT:
This index is searched using:
FORM SIF,
not form SIM.

OFFICIAL SIF PAGE:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/franchises-and-manors-apply-for-an-official-search-of-the-index-sif/

DIRECT SIF PDF:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b155225e5274a18fc321bce/SIF__2018-05-25_.pdf

HMLR says the search is made by ADMINISTRATIVE AREA.

For Watlington / Shouldham the relevant search needs the current administrative area
required by PG13.

The search certificate will state whether the index contains relevant registered
manors/franchises and supply title numbers/type of registration.

CURRENT FEES:
HMLR Information Services fees currently state:

SIF:
- £11 per administrative area by post;
- £7 per administrative area electronically.

OFFICIAL FEE PAGE:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/hm-land-registry-information-services-fees

PASS 14 CURRENT ACTION:
Run an SIF search for:
- MANORS;
- RELATING FRANCHISES;
in the relevant Norfolk administrative area.

Then inspect any revealed title number for:
- Watlington Colts;
- Watlington Trussbutts;
- variant Watlington manor title;
- any relating franchise plausibly corresponding to market/fair or other franchise.

IMPORTANT:
HMLR PG13 expressly warns that registered manor entries are lordship titles and in many
cases have no land or rights attached.

Therefore a positive SIF result proves registration, NOT an automatic substantive
rights bundle.

========================================================================
GE. HMLR — EXACT CURRENT SEARCH ROUTE FOR PHYSICAL LAND / BURDENED PARCELS
========================================================================

HM Land Registry Practice Guide 10 states:

FORM SIM / INDEX MAP searches deal with:
- registered estates in land;
- registered rentcharges;
- registered profits a prendre in gross;
- registered AFFECTING franchises;
- cautions and pending registrations.

They do NOT search:
- relating franchises;
- manors.

Those belong in SIF/PG13.

OFFICIAL PG10:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/official-searches-of-the-index-map/practice-guide-10-official-search-of-the-index-map

This means the modern investigation now has a clean two-search architecture:

SIF:
"Is there a registered manor / relating franchise?"

SIM / INDEX MAP:
"Who owns this exact piece of land, and what registered estate/profit/affecting
franchise touches it?"

PRACTICAL PARCEL TARGETS:
1. historic Colts Farm / capital messuage;
2. any surviving manorial waste;
3. parcels identifiable from HARE 2495 / HARE 6832 / tithe / c.1900 exchange plans;
4. Shouldham Sincks;
5. parcels affected by any proven fold/mineral/sporting/warren/piscary right.

========================================================================
GF. THE 1930 DEED REMAINS MISSING FROM PUBLIC SEARCH — BUT ITS IMPORTANCE INCREASES
========================================================================

PASS 14 re-searched:
- Norfolk Record Office indexed web material;
- Durham Hanby Holmes / Edleston catalogue;
- The Story Durham;
- wider public web;
using:
Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys / Humphreys;
Robert Holmes Edleston;
Watlington Colts;
Watlington Trussbutts;
12 February 1930.

RESULT:
No public-web catalogue entry for the actual 12 February 1930 Watlington Colts
conveyance was recovered.

STATUS:
UNRESOLVED, NOT DISPROVED.

IMPORTANT:
The Durham catalogue does show numerous Edleston purchases of manorial rights in the
same period with:
- draft conveyances;
- requisitions on title;
- completion statements;
- schedules of deeds;
- bills of costs.

For example:
D/HH 8/1/31
30 October 1931
Copeland's trustees -> R.H. Edleston
draft conveyance of Bowes Manorial Rights;
recites previous deeds;
consideration £140.

SOURCE:
https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ByRelevancy=No&ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165399&ItemNum=250&PageNum=9&Variations=

This shows the Hanby Holmes archive retained detailed completion material for Edleston's
other manorial purchases.

[Inference]
Therefore the absence of an online "Watlington" catalogue hit does not mean the 1930
deed was not retained somewhere in the firm's papers.

The search should now include:
- uncatalogued / broadly catalogued client files;
- Edleston purchase ledgers;
- bills of costs;
- completion books;
- correspondence by year;
- title schedules;
- office deed registers.

========================================================================
GG. 1977 ASSENTS — PUBLIC WEB SEARCH STILL NEGATIVE
========================================================================

PASS 14 searched for:
- Eric Richard Hanby Holmes + 21 December 1977;
- Richard John Hanby Holmes + 21 December 1977;
- Watlington + assent;
- Watlington Colts + assent.

No public-web image or catalogue description of the alleged 21 December 1977 Watlington
assent(s) was recovered.

The user-supplied legal chronology remains the current source for those steps.

IMPORTANT EXTERNAL CORROBORATION OF THE FAMILY/SOLICITOR IDENTITY:
A London Gazette notice concerning the estate of ERIC RICHARD HANBY HOLMES records:
- Eldersfield, Barnard Castle;
- retired solicitor;
- death 16 February 1981;
- personal representatives including RICHARD JOHN HANBY HOLMES.

SOURCE:
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/48555/page/3869/data.pdf

Companies House independently identifies Richard John Hanby Holmes as a solicitor,
born April 1934.

SOURCE:
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/7ME_ynEEk045HCkzG88n4yFWrQQ/appointments

These facts do NOT prove the Watlington assent.

They corroborate the identities/solicitor context in the supplied 1977 chain.

========================================================================
GH. 2016-2017 — IDENTITY/DEATH CORROBORATED; BENEFICIAL DEVOLUTION STILL NEEDS DEED/WILL
========================================================================

Independent public evidence identifies:

RICHARD JOHN HANBY HOLMES
born 28 April 1934
died 20 November 2016
married Olivia Mary Carruthers/Holmes.

SOURCE:
https://www.thepeerage.com/p6894.htm

Companies House independently confirms:
Richard John Hanby Holmes,
date of birth April 1934,
solicitor.

The user-supplied legal chronology gives:
22 May 2017 — Olivia Mary Holmes as probate grantee/personal representative.

PASS 14 public search did not recover the will/assent instrument showing the beneficial
vesting of Watlington Colts in Olivia.

Therefore the existing caution remains:

PROBATE GRANT != PROOF THAT THE LORDSHIP OR EVERY ASSOCIATED RIGHT WAS DEVISED/ASSENTED
TO THE PROBATE GRANTEE PERSONALLY.

The will / assent / transfer remains required.

========================================================================
GI. MODERN HARE / STOW SPORTING ESTATE — CURRENT EXISTENCE STRONGLY CORROBORATED
========================================================================

The modern wider-estate sporting lead is stronger after PASS 14.

2010 KING'S LYNN & WEST NORFOLK PLANNING REPORT:
Hall Farm Barns and Hall Farm House at Shouldham Thorpe are described as:

"an integral part of the Hare family's Stow Estate,
a traditional Norfolk farming and shooting estate"

The report states:
- mid-19th-century estate extent around 11,000 acres;
- then-current extent around 4,000 acres;
- including surrounding land.

OFFICIAL LOCAL-AUTHORITY PDF:
https://democracy.west-norfolk.gov.uk/Data/PlanningCommittee/20100712/Agenda/Reportsmarkedtofollow.pdf

CURRENT STOW ESTATE IDENTITY:
Church Farm's legal page gives:

STOW ESTATE TRUST
Home Farm Office
Stow Bardolph
King's Lynn
Norfolk
PE34 3HT.

https://churchfarmstowbardolph.co.uk/legal-privacy-policy/

Stow Hall Gardens likewise identifies Stow Estate Trust at the same address.

https://stowhallgardens.co.uk/privacy-policy/

The Parish Council's 2021 Sincks statement already records:
- Shouldham Sincks owned by Stow Estates;
- access required for Stow Estates and residents.

https://shouldham-pc.gov.uk/2021/01/23/shouldham-sincks-change-of-access/

COMBINED WITH FORESTRY ENGLAND:
- 1943 Forestry Commission management under a 999-year lease from the Hare Estate;
- sporting rights retained by "the estate";
- rights exercised in the Sincks.

[Inference]
The evidence now strongly supports continuity of a real HARE/STOW ESTATE sporting-land
structure into the modern period.

WHAT IT STILL DOES NOT PROVE:
- who owns the severed sporting rights today;
- whether Stow Estate Trust owns them rather than only the land;
- whether the 1943 lease reservation remains unchanged;
- whether those sporting rights ever formed part of Watlington Colts.

CURRENT STATUS:
REAL MODERN WIDER-ESTATE SPORTING RIGHT STREAM — STRONG.
COLTS/WATLINGTON-WEST CONNECTION — UNPROVED.

========================================================================
GJ. MINERALS — MODERN GEOLOGICAL VALUE EXISTS IN THE RIGHT AREA, TITLE DOES NOT
========================================================================

The current rights shortlist treats minerals/quarries as a high-value category because
they are legally capable of surviving.

PASS 14 adds modern planning/geological context:

Norfolk minerals-planning work has identified substantial silica-sand resource potential
around:
- Shouldham;
- Shouldham Thorpe;
- Marham;
- Runcton Holme;
- Tottenhill;
- Stow Bardolph.

Examples:

Historic proposed SIL02:
Shouldham + Marham
approximately 390 hectares
estimated silica-sand resource:
16,000,000 tonnes.

SOURCE:
https://norfolk.oc2.uk/document/49/4209

Area of Search AOS E:
land north of Shouldham.

MAP:
https://norfolk.oc2.uk/docfiles/71/A3.5SustainabilityAppraisalAppendixC-mapsofproposedmineralsites.pdf

Later sustainability work did NOT allocate AOS E and several related areas because of
planning constraints.

SOURCE:
https://norfolk.oc2.uk/docfiles/71/A3.2SustainabilityAppraisalReportPartBMarch2022.pdf

CURRENT PLAN CONTEXT:
https://norfolk.oc2.uk/document/72/8153

RIGHTS SIGNIFICANCE:
This proves only that potentially valuable mineral geology exists in the wider
Shouldham/Tottenhill/Stow landscape.

It does NOT prove:
- Colts mineral ownership;
- a manorial reservation;
- present mineral title;
- development permission;
- economic recoverability.

But it increases the practical value of resolving:
1. whether the 1749/1798 awards reserved minerals;
2. whether c.1900 Hare exchanges reserved minerals;
3. whether the 1930 conveyance included/excluded minerals;
4. whether any modern parcel register contains a manorial mineral notice.

========================================================================
GK. PRESENT-DAY STATUS MATRIX — PASS 14
========================================================================

RIGHT / INTEREST CURRENT RESEARCH POSITION
------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------

Lordship/title Current Watlington-West endpoint supplied.
HMLR SIF search now a concrete official next step.

Physical manorial land SIM/index-map + current registers needed.
Lordship ownership proves no land automatically.

Minerals/quarries Legally capable; modern geology potentially valuable.
No Colts mineral title yet.

Sporting Genuine modern wider Hare/Stow stream strongly
evidenced. No Colts bridge / current sporting owner.

Warren Historic Bardolf level + modern sporting context.
Specific Colts devolution unproved.

Fold Historic Colts-linked evidence materially strong by
1597. Modern proprietary survival still unproved.

16s rent Historic direct evidence; no modern survival chain.

Market/fair Legally capable franchise category; no current Colts
title/registration located publicly.

Piscary Legally capable; Colts evidence remains weak.

Drain/work liability Legally capable in limited form; no current parcel.

Advowson Separate ecclesiastical stream; cannot simply be sold
with modern lordship.

Court/heriots/copyhold Historic only; no present exercisable feudal power.

========================================================================
GL. PASS 14 — NEW IMMEDIATE ACTION ORDER
========================================================================

1. TNA HMC 5/6-8
Search official 1920s manor/title-owner lists for Watlington variants + Humphreys/
Coote/Plestow/Hare.

2. HMLR FORM SIF
Search Norfolk administrative area for:
- registered manors;
- relating franchises.
Capture every returned title number/description.

3. D/HH 8/2/86
c.1930 R.H. Edleston manors/advowsons list.

4. 12 FEB 1930 HUMPHREYS -> EDLESTON CONVEYANCE
Search Hanby Holmes completion/title files beyond web-keyword catalogue entries.

5. 21 DEC 1977 ASSENTS
Obtain copies from family/legal title bundle or archive if deposited.

6. 2016-2017 WILL / PROBATE / ASSENT
Establish beneficial vesting to Olivia.

7. CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST TRANSFER
Compare exact rights/exception clauses against 1930 and 1977 wording.

8. HMLR SIM / INDEX MAP
Once parcels are reconstructed:
Colts Farm;
residual waste;
HARE 2495/HARE 6832 parcels;
Sincks;
any mineral/sporting burdened land.

9. HARE 6374-5 + HARE 6956
Pre-1926 estate severance/reservation test.

10. 1749 WATLINGTON AWARD
Still essential for fold/common/waste/mineral transformations.

========================================================================
GM. PASS 14 — NEW / UPDATED URL LEDGER ITEMS
========================================================================

NEW:

TNA — Manors and manorial records:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/manors

TNA — historical/legislative background of MDR:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archives-sector/legislation/historical-and-legislative-background/

TNA — manorial documents/lordships guide:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/manorial-documents-lordships-how-to-use-manorial-document-register/

HMLR PG13:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/official-searches-of-the-index-of-relating-franchises-and-manors/practice-guide-13-official-searches-of-the-index-of-relating-franchises-and-manors

HMLR SIF:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/franchises-and-manors-apply-for-an-official-search-of-the-index-sif/

HMLR SIF PDF:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5b155225e5274a18fc321bce/SIF__2018-05-25_.pdf

HMLR Information Services Fees:
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/hm-land-registry-information-services-fees

HMLR PG10:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/official-searches-of-the-index-map/practice-guide-10-official-search-of-the-index-map

Durham D/HH 8/1/31 example Edleston manorial-right conveyance:
https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ByRelevancy=No&ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165399&ItemNum=250&PageNum=9&Variations=

London Gazette — Eric Richard Hanby Holmes estate:
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/48555/page/3869/data.pdf

Companies House — Richard John Hanby Holmes:
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/7ME_ynEEk045HCkzG88n4yFWrQQ/appointments

Stow Estate planning report:
https://democracy.west-norfolk.gov.uk/Data/PlanningCommittee/20100712/Agenda/Reportsmarkedtofollow.pdf

Stow Estate Trust legal page:
https://churchfarmstowbardolph.co.uk/legal-privacy-policy/

Silica sand Shouldham/Marham:
https://norfolk.oc2.uk/document/49/4209

Shouldham AOS map:
https://norfolk.oc2.uk/docfiles/71/A3.5SustainabilityAppraisalAppendixC-mapsofproposedmineralsites.pdf

Norfolk Minerals SA:
https://norfolk.oc2.uk/docfiles/71/A3.2SustainabilityAppraisalReportPartBMarch2022.pdf

========================================================================
GN. PASS 14 — WHAT WAS ACTUALLY LEARNED
========================================================================

1. TNA HMC 5/6-8 is a newly promoted decisive near-modern source: official 1920s lists
of manors and details of title ownership derived from government/tax material.

2. That source sits immediately before the 1930 Humphreys -> Edleston conveyance and
should independently test the pre-Edleston title.

3. HMLR's present search mechanism is now exact:
SIF = relating franchises/manors;
SIM/index map = physical land, profits, affecting franchises and parcel registration.

4. The current SIF fee is £11 postal / £7 electronic per administrative area.

5. No public-web copy of the 1930 Watlington conveyance has yet been recovered.

6. Durham's Hanby Holmes archive demonstrably preserves detailed draft conveyances,
requisitions, deed schedules and completion accounts for Edleston's other manorial
purchases at the same period, which strengthens the case for a deeper archive search.

7. No public-web copy of the alleged 21 Dec 1977 Watlington assent(s) was recovered.

8. Richard John Hanby Holmes' identity as a solicitor and son/representative in the Hanby
Holmes estate context is independently corroborated, but that does not replace the
Watlington deeds.

9. The Stow Estate remained a real Norfolk farming AND SHOOTING estate into the modern
period, with a 2010 local-authority report placing it at about 4,000 acres.

10. Stow Estate Trust is a currently identifiable estate entity at Stow Bardolph.

11. That strengthens the modern Hare/Stow sporting-right stream but still does not attach
it to Watlington Colts.

12. Modern Norfolk planning evidence identifies potentially valuable silica-sand geology
in the Shouldham/Tottenhill/Stow landscape. This makes mineral-title research
commercially meaningful but does not prove any Colts mineral right.

13. The project is now in a position to run official current HMLR searches rather than
relying only on historical web material.

14. NO substantive right has yet passed all six current-period proof gates.

END OF PASS 14 ADDITION
END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
========================================================================
GO. PASS 15 — PRIVATE PRIMARY DEEDS SUPPLIED: MODERN CHAIN NOW DOCUMENTED
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 15 is based on private primary conveyancing/probate documents supplied directly by
the user. These documents are NOT public-web sources and should NOT be repeatedly
searched for online in later passes.

PRIVATE FILE SET:
- Watlington-Colts_Batch_5_Enhanced_Ordered — Humphreys -> Edleston conveyance
- Watlington-Colts_Batch_1_Enhanced_Ordered — 1954 personal-representative assent
- Watlington-Colts_Batch_2_Enhanced_Ordered — 1977 assent by administrator de bonis non
- Watlington-Colts_Batch_4_Enhanced_Ordered — 1977 vesting assent to Richard J.H. Holmes
- Watlington-Colts_Batch_3_Enhanced_Ordered — 2017 probate grant to Olivia Mary Holmes

These documents materially replace several earlier "missing modern conveyance" cautions.

The current-period question is now narrower:

WHICH SPECIFIC RIGHTS WERE STILL SUBSISTING WITH WATLINGTON COLTS/TRUSBUTTS BY 1930?

If a right had already been extinguished, commuted, severed or conveyed away before 1930,
the modern deeds cannot revive it.

If a right was still legally appurtenant/subsisting in 1930, the private deeds now give a
much stronger route for carrying it forward.

========================================================================
GP. 12 FEBRUARY 1930 — PRIMARY CONVEYANCE: HUMPHREYS -> EDLESTON
========================================================================

PRIVATE PRIMARY DOCUMENT:
Conveyance between:

MARY RHODA SPOONER HUMPHREYS
widow
of 5 Palace Gate, Kensington, County of London

and

ROBERT HOLMES EDLESTON
of Gainford, County Durham, Esquire.

OPERATIVE DATE:
The body of the deed states:
12 February 1930.

The cover carries later 1931 annotations/approval/enrolment-type markings.
For chain purposes the operative text date is presently treated as 12 February 1930,
subject to any superior original/sealing evidence.

IMPORTANT RECITAL:
The deed recites an earlier conveyance dated:

16 DECEMBER 1929

between:
JAMES HENRY TOWNSEND GREEN
of 22 Chancery Lane, London,
land agent and surveyor,

and
THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE,

of the one part,

and Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys of the other part,

under which the hereditaments now conveyed, together with other hereditaments, were
granted to Humphreys in fee simple.

THIS IS A NEW TITLE-CHAIN CORRECTION.

The modern chain must NOT simply say:
George Coote -> inheritance -> Mary Humphreys -> Edleston

without accounting for the 16 December 1929 conveyance.

The 1929 deed is now a major predecessor-title target.

CONSIDERATION:
£100.

The vendor conveys AS BENEFICIAL OWNER.

THE PROPERTY IS EXPRESSLY:

ALL THOSE
MANORS OR REPUTED MANORS OR LORDSHIPS OF:

- WATLINGTON;
- WATLINGTON GAWSELLS WITH WEST DEREHAM;
- WATLINGTON COLTS OTHERWISE TRUSBUTTS;
- TOTTENHILL;

in Norfolk.

CRITICAL RIGHTS WORDING:

"as far as the same respectively are subsisting"

and with:

"the rights royalties members and appurtenances
to the same belonging or in anywise appertaining"

TO HOLD to Robert Holmes Edleston in fee simple.

This is now PRIMARY EVIDENCE that the 1930 transaction was not framed merely as the
sale of four bare names/titles.

It expressly purported to convey:
- the subsisting manors/lordships;
- their rights;
- royalties;
- members;
- appurtenances.

The vendor had also agreed to sell the hereditaments free from incumbrances.

CRITICAL LEGAL LIMIT:
The clause transfers only what was legally subsisting/belonging/appertaining at the date.

It does NOT identify which individual historic right still existed.

It does NOT revive:
- an extinguished foldcourse;
- a severed mineral title;
- a separately sold sporting right;
- a market franchise already lost;
- a rent already redeemed/extinguished.

Therefore the 1930 deed is the MODERN TRANSMISSION BRIDGE, not by itself proof of the
historic survival of each right.

========================================================================
GQ. LPA 1925 — THE PRIVATE WORDING IS STRONGER THAN OUR PREVIOUS ASSUMPTION
========================================================================

PASS 13 had relied principally on Law of Property Act 1925 s.62(3) as a possible implied
general-words mechanism.

The private deed now improves that analysis.

The 1930 instrument ITSELF expressly conveys:
"rights royalties members and appurtenances".

Section 62(3) therefore operates as reinforcement rather than the sole basis.

Law of Property Act 1925 s.62(3) supplies very broad implied general words on a
conveyance of a manor, subject to contrary intention.

Section 205 defines "conveyance" broadly and expressly includes:
- assent;
- vesting declaration;
- vesting instrument;
and other assurances of property.

LEGAL CONSEQUENCE FOR THIS CHAIN:
The 1930 conveyance has express rights wording.

The 1977 assents are themselves within the statutory definition of "conveyance", so the
general-words regime is relevant to them too, subject always to:
- the exact documents;
- contrary intention;
- whether the right was still legally attached.

OFFICIAL STATUTE:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1925/20/pdfs/ukpga_19250020_en.pdf

========================================================================
GR. 27 MAY 1954 — SARAH EDLESTON ASSENT DOES NOT DISPOSE OF WATLINGTON
========================================================================

PRIVATE PRIMARY DOCUMENT:
Personal Representative Assent
Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston.

The document records:
- Robert Holmes Edleston died 30 November 1952 intestate;
- without issue or parent;
- Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston, his lawful sister of whole blood, was sole statutory
beneficiary;
- Letters of Administration were granted 16 September 1953.

On 27 May 1954 Sarah assented to herself in respect of identified Yorkshire manors:
- Sutton Howgrave;
- Caldwell/Coldwell;
- Bracken upon the Wolds;

with their rights.

WATLINGTON COLTS / TRUSBUTTS IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS 1954 ASSENT.

SIGNIFICANCE:
This is direct evidence against an accidental assumption that all Robert's manors had
already been assented to Sarah in 1954.

It supports the later 1977 recital that Robert's administration remained incomplete.

========================================================================
GS. 21 DECEMBER 1977 — FIRST ASSENT: ROBERT'S UNADMINISTERED ESTATE
========================================================================

PRIVATE PRIMARY DOCUMENT:
ASSENT
by ERIC RICHARD HANBY HOLMES
of Eldersfield, Barnard Castle,
retired solicitor.

CAPACITY:
sole surviving Administrator under Letters of Administration issued jointly with:
BERTRAM STEPHEN LIDDON SURTEES RAINE
(deceased 14 June 1971)

out of Durham District Probate Registry
31 May 1966

of the estate of:
ROBERT HOLMES EDLESTON
died 30 November 1952 intestate.

The deed expressly recites:
- Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston was Robert's lawful sister of the whole blood;
- she was the only person entitled to his estate;
- administration had not been completed when she died 24 January 1956.

Eric therefore assents to the vesting IN HIMSELF:

in his separate capacity as
SOLE SURVIVING EXECUTOR OF THE WILL OF SARAH ALICE CUMMING EDLESTON,

an estate in fee simple in any scheduled property which may have been comprised in
Robert Holmes Edleston's unadministered estate at Sarah's death.

THE SCHEDULE EXPRESSLY INCLUDES, IN NORFOLK:

"The Manor or Manors of Tottenhill and Watlington
(otherwise Watlington Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham
Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts)"

as well as other Norfolk manors.

THIS IS PRIMARY PROOF THAT:
WATLINGTON COLTS OTHERWISE TRUSBUTTS
was specifically treated as an existing manor/lordship interest within Robert Holmes
Edleston's estate and was expressly captured by the 1977 administration/assent process.

This replaces the earlier status "1977 assent based only on supplied chronology".

========================================================================
GT. 21 DECEMBER 1977 — SECOND VESTING ASSENT: ERIC -> RICHARD
========================================================================

PRIVATE PRIMARY DOCUMENT:
VESTING ASSENT

ERIC RICHARD HANBY HOLMES,
as sole surviving executor of Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston,

assents to the vesting of property in:

RICHARD JOHN HANBY HOLMES
of 15 Alleyn Road, Dulwich, London,
Solicitor,

for an estate in fee simple.

PART I:
Manor/reputed Manor of Cranwich.

PART II:
ALL OTHER (IF ANY)
manors or lordships or reputed manors or lordships

vested in / belonging to / forming part of
Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston's estate

to the extent not already comprised in an earlier Assent dated:
30 October 1969

made by Eric Richard Hanby Holmes and Bertram Stephen Liddon Surtees Raine
in favour of Richard John Hanby Holmes.

The Second Schedule expressly lists:
- 16 Sep 1953 Letters of Administration of Robert's estate to Sarah;
- 22 May 1954 assent by Sarah to herself;
- 31 May 1966 Letters of Administration of Robert's remaining estate to Eric/Raine;
- 21 Dec 1977 assent by Eric, administrator de bonis non, to himself as executor of Sarah.

CHAIN EFFECT:
The two same-day 1977 documents are complementary and MUST NOT be collapsed.

STEP A:
Robert's unadministered manor interests,
including expressly Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts,
are brought into Eric's hands as executor of Sarah.

STEP B:
the residual Sarah-estate manors/lordships not already transferred in 1969 are vested
in Richard John Hanby Holmes in fee simple.

[Inference]
On the face of the supplied documents, Watlington Colts falls within this residual
sweep unless it can be shown to have already been comprised in the 1969 assent.

Given that the first 1977 deed is specifically required to bring the unadministered
Robert property into Sarah's executor's hands, the documentary structure strongly
supports Watlington passing onward to Richard in the second 1977 vesting assent.

DECISIVE CHECK:
The 30 October 1969 assent remains worth inspecting, primarily to exclude duplication
and understand which Sarah-estate manors had already been transferred.

========================================================================
GU. 2016-2017 — RICHARD'S DEATH AND OLIVIA'S PROBATE AUTHORITY ARE NOW PRIMARY-PROVED
========================================================================

PRIVATE PRIMARY DOCUMENT:
High Court of Justice
District Probate Registry at Brighton.

RICHARD JOHN HANBY HOLMES
of 15 Alleyn Road, London SE21 8AB

died:
20 November 2016.

The grant states his Last Will and Testament was proved and registered and administration
of the estate devolving to and vesting in his personal representative was granted to:

OLIVIA MARY HOLMES
of 15 Alleyn Road, London SE21 8AB

as EXECUTOR.

DATE:
22 May 2017.

STATUS:
PRIMARY DOCUMENTARY PROOF of:
- Richard's death date;
- existence/probate of his will;
- Olivia's appointment as executor/personal representative.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
The probate grant alone does NOT state the beneficial devise of Watlington Colts.

It gives Olivia representative authority over the estate.

TO PROVE THE NEXT STEP WE NEED EITHER:
- Richard's will clause dealing with residue/manors;
- an assent to Olivia personally;
or
- the direct executor/vendor transfer from Olivia into the current Watlington-West
title.

========================================================================
GV. WHAT THE PRIVATE CHAIN NOW PROVES ABOUT RIGHTS
========================================================================

The modern BENEFIT-side chain is now substantially stronger:

12 FEB 1930
HUMPHREYS
|
| conveys Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts
| "as far as ... subsisting"
| WITH "rights royalties members and appurtenances"
v
ROBERT HOLMES EDLESTON
|
| dies intestate 1952
v
UNADMINISTERED ESTATE
|
| 1954 assent deals with selected YORKSHIRE manors only
| Watlington not disposed of there
v
1966 ADMINISTRATION DE BONIS NON
ERIC HOLMES + RAINE
|
| 21 Dec 1977 first assent explicitly schedules
| Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts
v
ERIC HOLMES AS EXECUTOR OF SARAH
|
| 21 Dec 1977 vesting assent
| residual Sarah-estate manors/lordships
v
RICHARD JOHN HANBY HOLMES
|
| dies 20 Nov 2016
v
OLIVIA MARY HOLMES
EXECUTOR / PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE
22 May 2017
|
| CURRENT TRANSFER STILL REQUIRED
v
CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST ENDPOINT

THIS IS A MAJOR CHANGE.

Previously:
1930 and 1977 were largely chronology claims awaiting deeds.

Now:
the central 1930 and 1977 modern transmissions are supported by supplied primary
documents.

========================================================================
GW. CURRENT RIGHTS — WHAT IS NOW STRONGER
========================================================================

1. GENERAL RIGHTS CONTINUITY AFTER 1930
---------------------------------------
STRONGER.

The 1930 deed expressly passes then-subsisting:
- rights;
- royalties;
- members;
- appurtenances.

The 1977 deeds show the named manor continued through the estate chain.

Therefore, IF a specific proprietary right can be proved still attached to Watlington
Colts on 12 February 1930, we now have a substantially stronger prima facie route for
carrying its BENEFIT through to Richard Holmes.

2. MINERALS / QUARRIES
-----------------------
STILL UNPROVED FACTUALLY, BUT MODERN CHAIN NO LONGER THE MAIN WEAKNESS.

We need to establish:
- pre-1930 Colts mineral title/custom/reservation;
- no severance before 1930;
- modern burdened parcels;
- 2013 priority;
- current transfer.

3. SPORTING / WARREN
---------------------
Same position:
the modern Hare/Stow sporting stream exists, but we still need a document connecting
that stream to Watlington Colts rather than the wider estate.

4. FOLD
-------
Historic evidence is now strong through 1597.

The 1930 rights/appurtenance clause would be capable of carrying a surviving proprietary
fold-related interest.

The remaining problem is whether the fold liberty survived:
- 1749 enclosure;
- later estate reorganisation;
- twentieth-century statutory reform
in a legally transmissible form.

5. MARKET / FAIR / PISCARY
---------------------------
The 1930 deed removes one modern conveyancing objection:
a then-subsisting franchise/appurtenant right was not necessarily omitted merely because
it was not individually named.

But particular Colts ownership and current land-registration/franchise status remain
unproved.

========================================================================
GX. WHAT THE PRIVATE CHAIN DOES NOT PROVE
========================================================================

The words:
"rights royalties members and appurtenances"

are powerful conveyancing words.

They DO NOT prove that every historically encountered right was subsisting in 1930.

We still cannot presently say that the 1930 deed proves ownership of:
- minerals;
- free warren;
- sporting;
- market/fair;
- piscary;
- fold;
- the 16s rent;
- waste;
unless the earlier chain shows that right remained attached.

Nor do these private deeds answer the burdened-land side:
- parcel identification;
- registration;
- notices;
- post-2013 purchaser priority.

========================================================================
GY. CURRENT TRANSFER — FINAL BENEFIT-SIDE DOCUMENT STILL NEEDED
========================================================================

The only major modern conveyancing gap now remaining is the final current transfer.

The 2017 document proves Olivia as executor.

It does NOT show, by itself:
- an assent of the manor to Olivia beneficially;
- the words of the transfer to the present holder;
- whether rights/royalties/appurtenances were included;
- whether any rights were reserved or excluded.

For CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST rights, inspect the executed transfer for:

1. capacity of Olivia:
- beneficial owner;
- executor/personal representative;
- trustee;
- other.

2. exact property:
- Watlington Colts;
- Trussbutts;
- Watlington-West;
- all aliases.

3. operative words:
- rights;
- royalties;
- members;
- appurtenances;
- franchises;
- liberties;
- privileges;
- benefits.

4. reservations/exceptions:
- mineral;
- sporting;
- market;
- warren;
- fishing;
- land/waste;
- archival/title documents.

5. assignment of title deeds / evidential documents.

If the current executed transfer substantially mirrors the broad 1930 rights language
and contains no rights reservation, the BENEFIT-side modern continuity will become much
stronger.

========================================================================
GZ. TITLE-CHAIN CORRECTIONS REQUIRED
========================================================================

CORRECTION 1:
Do not describe Mary Humphreys merely as acquiring directly from George Coote by
inheritance immediately before Edleston.

The 1930 deed recites an operative:
16 December 1929 conveyance
from James Henry Townsend Green + Public Trustee
to Humphreys.

That deed must be inserted into the documentary chain.

CORRECTION 2:
The 1954 Sarah assent is not a general assent of all Robert's manors.
It expressly handles selected Yorkshire manors.

CORRECTION 3:
The 1977 stage is now PRIMARY-PROVED and genuinely two-step:
- Robert unadministered estate -> Eric as Sarah's executor;
- Sarah estate residual manors -> Richard.

CORRECTION 4:
Olivia's 2017 status is proven as EXECUTOR.
Do not call her beneficial owner merely because she received probate.

========================================================================
HA. PASS 15 — REVISED CURRENT-PERIOD PRIORITIES
========================================================================

1. CURRENT EXECUTED TRANSFER TO WATLINGTON-WEST.
This is now the main missing modern benefit-side deed.

2. 16 DECEMBER 1929 GREEN + PUBLIC TRUSTEE -> HUMPHREYS CONVEYANCE.
Critical predecessor to the 1930 deed; likely contains earlier recitals.

3. 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP.
Still perhaps the decisive fold/common/waste/mineral transformation document.

4. c.1900 HARE EXCHANGE DEEDS / PLANS.
Pre-1930 severance/reservation test.

5. HMLR SIF:
registered manor / relating franchise.

6. SIM / current and historic parcel registers:
after specific potentially burdened parcels are reconstructed.

7. HARE 2403 full 1597 exemplification:
exact fold-right allocation.

8. SPORTING:
actual 1943 Hare Estate -> Forestry Commission lease and later variations.

9. MINERALS:
title/reservation search against reconstructed historic parcels.

10. 30 OCTOBER 1969 ASSENT.
Mainly to complete the modern administration file and establish which manors had
already passed before the 1977 residual vesting assent.

========================================================================
HB. PASS 15 — SOURCE STATUS POLICY CHANGE
========================================================================

The following modern documents are PRIVATE PRIMARY SOURCES supplied by the user:

- 1930 Humphreys -> Edleston conveyance;
- 1954 Sarah Edleston assent;
- 1977 Eric Hanby Holmes administrator assent;
- 1977 Eric -> Richard vesting assent;
- 2017 Richard Holmes probate grant.

DO NOT:
- search repeatedly for public copies;
- downgrade them because no public URL exists;
- substitute secondary sales narratives for their terms.

DO:
- cite the private copies as the controlling evidence for their wording;
- use public statutes/HMLR/archive sources only for legal effect, predecessor research,
burdened-land research and independent corroboration.

========================================================================
HC. PASS 15 — BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

This private batch materially changes the modern-rights assessment.

The chain from 1930 to Richard Holmes is no longer merely a narrative reconstruction.

It is supported by primary instruments.

The 1930 deed expressly purports to convey Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts
together with its then-subsisting:
RIGHTS, ROYALTIES, MEMBERS AND APPURTENANCES.

That means the key question is no longer:
"DID THE 1930 SALE INCLUDE RIGHTS AT ALL?"

Answer:
YES — as a class, the instrument expressly includes rights/royalties/members/appurtenances,
to the extent they were then subsisting and legally belonged/appertained.

The question is now:
"WHICH SPECIFIC HISTORIC COLTS RIGHTS WERE STILL SUBSISTING IN 1930?"

That is the decisive historical-survival problem.

Once a specific right is proved to have survived to 1930, the supplied deeds give a much
stronger benefit-side route toward the current chain.

The remaining modern benefit gap is the executed current transfer after the 2017 probate
stage.

END OF PASS 15 ADDITION
END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
========================================================================
HD. PASS 16 — CURRENT TRANSFER REMOVED AS BOTTLENECK; SURVIVAL-ONLY ANALYSIS
========================================================================

[Unverified]

USER INSTRUCTION / WORKING PREMISE:
The present transfer conveyed everything that was still historically associated with
Watlington-Colts / Trussbutts at the point of transfer.

The 1930 primary deed provides the operative historic model:
the manor/lordship "as far as the same respectively are subsisting" with its
"rights royalties members and appurtenances".

PASS 16 therefore REMOVES the current executed transfer from the decisive-document list.

The only relevant inquiry is now:

A. Was a right actually a right of WATLINGTON COLTS / TRUSBUTTS?
B. If yes, did it survive every extinction/severance/transformation event up to 1930?

If YES to both:
the modern transmission chain is treated as sufficient for present-benefit purposes,
subject separately to any modern priority issue affecting burdened registered land.

========================================================================
HE. THE SURVIVAL FILTER IS NOW MUCH NARROWER
========================================================================

HM LAND REGISTRY PRACTICE GUIDE 66 reproduces the rights preserved by paragraphs 5 and
6 of Schedule 12 to the Law of Property Act 1922.

The preserved classes included:

- mines;
- minerals;
- limestone;
- lime;
- clay;
- stone;
- gravel;
- pits;
- quarries;
- rights of entry / way / search and other privileges necessary to win/work/remove them;
- fairs;
- markets;
- chase;
- warren;
- piscaries;
- hunting;
- shooting;
- fishing;
- fowling / taking game, fish or fowl;
- certain obligations concerning dykes, ditches, canals and other works.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013/practice-guide-66-overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013

PRIMARY STATUTE:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1922/16/pdfs/ukpga_19220016_en.pdf

PASS 16 CONSEQUENCE:
These are the classes worth the strongest historical search effort because they are
legally capable of crossing the 1926 reform boundary.

Other historic manor incidents require different treatment.

========================================================================
HF. ORDINARY COPYHOLD / MANORIAL INCIDENTS — NOT PRESENT RIGHTS
========================================================================

Parliamentary evidence summarising the 1922 regime states that ordinary manorial
incidents such as:
- entry fines;
- quit rents;
- reliefs;
- heriots;
and related incidents
were extinguished through the statutory compensation process.

It contrasts these with the mineral/sporting/market classes which were preserved.

SOURCE:
https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/52466/html/

RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:

HERIOTS / COPYHOLD FINES / RELIEFS / FEALTY / SUIT:
Not a present Watlington-West rights target.

16s RENT OF 1506:
The legal character of that rent has never been established.

If it was merely a manorial quit/customary rent:
it falls on the extinguishment side of the 1922 reforms.

If it was an independent rentcharge or other legally distinct rent:
a different survival route could theoretically exist.

There is currently NO evidence proving the latter.

Therefore the 16s rent should be downgraded as a modern candidate unless a later document
identifies its legal character and continuation.

========================================================================
HG. THE FOLD — HISTORICALLY STRONG; SURVIVAL NOW LOOKS WEAK
========================================================================

The fold is currently the strongest distinctive historic Colts/Trussbutts right.

HISTORIC EVIDENCE:

1506:
CP 25/1/170/197 no.106
records:
"1 free fold in Watlyngton".

https://www.medievalgenealogy.org.uk/fines/abstracts/CP_25_1_170_197.shtml

The precise identity of that 1506 Watlyngton manor with Colts remains an earlier
documentary issue.

1597:
HARE 2402 expressly conveys:
"the manor of Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes".

HARE 2403 then records a title package containing a:
LIBERTY OF A FOLD
operating in Watlyngton and other named places.

This gives a much stronger Colts-era fold link than the 1506 fine alone.

GENERAL HISTORICAL / LEGAL CONTEXT:
Modern scholarship on East Anglian foldcourse states that the foldcourse as a LEGAL
ENTITY disappeared with enclosure.

SOURCE:
https://suffolkinstitute.pdfsrv.co.uk/customers/SuffolkInstitute/2024/02/02/SIAH2021011BusActiv.pdf

Agricultural-history scholarship likewise shows parliamentary inclosure acts could
expressly extinguish rights of sheepwalk and shackage.

SOURCE:
https://bahs.org.uk/AGHR/VOLUMES/AGHR5.pdf

WATLINGTON:
The Watlington Inclosure Act received Royal Assent 26 May 1749.

TITLE:
An Act for enclosing and dividing certain Commons and Wastes within the Manor and
Parish of Watlington, Norfolk.

SOURCE:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/

SHOULDHAM:
Colts also lay partly in Shouldham.
Shouldham / Shouldham Thorpe had its own later enclosure process culminating in the
1798 award/schedule.

PASS 16 INFERENCE:
The fold right therefore has TWO major local enclosure gates:
- 1749 for the Watlington portion;
- 1790s/1798 for the Shouldham/Shouldham-Thorpe landscape.

It is now UNSAFE to treat the fold as a plausible twentieth-century manorial right simply
because it is in the 1597 title.

The working probability is:

HISTORIC FOLD / FOLDCOURSE:
YES.

SURVIVAL AS A FOLDCOURSE/FOLD LIBERTY AFTER PARLIAMENTARY ENCLOSURE:
UNLIKELY.

PROVED EXTINGUISHMENT:
NOT YET — because the actual award wording has not been read.

POSSIBLE TRANSFORMATION:
An award could theoretically have substituted:
- an allotment;
- compensation;
- a parcel;
- an easement;
- another proprietary interest.

That substituted property, if any, would need its own later title chain.

DECISIVE DOCUMENTS:
1. full 1749 Watlington award;
2. full 1798 Shouldham/Thorpe award;
3. parcel mapping against Colts;
4. HARE 2403 original wording.

========================================================================
HH. PHYSICAL COLTS ESTATE SURVIVED LONG AFTER THE MEDIEVAL MANOR
========================================================================

Historic England establishes:
- capital messuage / Colt's close;
- tenements;
- alder carr;
- Appletons;
in the 1633 field book.

It also says Colts Farm later encompassed the whole scheduled area and is shown on the
1811-1818 Hare estate map.

SOURCE:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry

PASS 16 ADDS A STRONG LATE-NINETEENTH-CENTURY ESTATE ANCHOR:

NRO HARE 5466, 222 x 5
post-1874 estate schedules expressly include:
"Colts Farm in Shouldham"

among Hare Estate farms.

TNA DISCOVERY:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/81c466ba-2759-40d3-b601-12e9249d85f6

SIGNIFICANCE:
The physical Colts estate remained an identifiable Hare-estate farm into the later
nineteenth century.

THIS IS NOT A MANORIAL RIGHT.

But it is important for:
- locating former Colts soil;
- identifying former copyhold/demesne parcels;
- searching mineral reservations;
- testing sporting/warren geography;
- determining when the physical estate separated from the incorporeal lordship.

The £100 1930 lordship conveyance identifies manors/lordships rather than a farm-acreage
schedule, so the physical land and the incorporeal lordship must not be assumed to be
identical by 1930.

========================================================================
HI. MINERALS — NOW THE HIGHEST-VALUE UNRESOLVED SURVIVAL TARGET
========================================================================

LEGAL SURVIVAL:
Strong.
Mineral rights are expressly within the preserved Schedule-12 class.

HMLR Practice Guide 65 confirms that rights to mines/minerals reserved to the lord on
copyhold enfranchisement can survive separately from the surface.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/registration-of-mines-and-minerals-pg65/practice-guide-65-registration-of-mines-and-minerals

It specifically recognises rights preserved under:
- Copyhold Act 1852;
- Copyhold Act 1894;
- Schedule 12 LPA 1922.

CURRENT COLTS EVIDENCE:
NONE DIRECT.

No document yet recovered says:
- mines/minerals reserved to Watlington Colts;
- stone/clay/gravel belonged to the lord of Colts;
- copyhold land of Colts was enfranchised subject to minerals;
- a compensation agreement preserved minerals.

Therefore:

MINERAL RIGHT = LEGALLY PLAUSIBLE SURVIVOR.
COLTS MINERAL TITLE = NOT YET PROVED.

BEST HISTORICAL ATTACK:
- Colts court/copyhold records;
- 1749 and 1798 awards;
- nineteenth-century enfranchisements;
- post-1874 Colts Farm estate schedules;
- c.1900 exchange deeds;
- 1920s compensation/enfranchisement material.

========================================================================
HJ. SPORTING / WARREN — SURVIVABLE CLASS, BUT COLTS ORIGIN STILL MISSING
========================================================================

LEGAL SURVIVAL:
Yes.
Chase/warren and hunting/shooting/fowling are expressly preserved categories.

HISTORIC WATLINGTON:
1254 free-warren grant is proved only at superior Bardolf/Wormegay level.

No subgrant or later exercise has yet attached that warren specifically to Colts.

MODERN SHOULDHAM:
Forestry England proves the wider Hare Estate retained sporting rights over the
Shouldham forestry lease and exercised them in the Sincks.

That is a real modern right stream.

But no document yet says:
"WATLINGTON COLTS sporting rights"
or shows the modern Hare sporting reservation was derived from Colts rather than the
larger consolidated Stow/Shouldham estate.

CURRENT RESULT:
SURVIVAL CLASS = YES.
REAL MODERN ESTATE SPORTING RIGHT = YES.
COLTS ORIGIN = UNPROVED.

This remains a serious target, but not a current Watlington-West right until the origin
is bridged.

========================================================================
HK. MARKET / FAIR / PISCARY — LEGALLY SURVIVABLE BUT CURRENTLY FAIL THE COLTS-IDENTITY TEST
========================================================================

MARKET / FAIR:
Can legally survive.
Evidence exists at:
- superior Wormegay level;
- Shouldham historical level.

No grant, court exercise, toll account or conveyance yet proves that the franchise
belonged specifically to Watlington Colts/Trussbutts.

PISCARY:
Can legally survive.
The Domesday fishery previously attributed to Colts was source-conflated and belongs to
a Baynard Shouldham entry unless later descent is proved.

Therefore:
neither market/fair nor piscary presently passes Gate A:
"Was this actually a Colts right?"

They remain secondary targets.

========================================================================
HL. WORKS / DYKES / DITCHES — POSSIBLE SURVIVOR, NO COLTS CUSTOM YET
========================================================================

Schedule 12 preserved certain obligations concerning:
- construction;
- maintenance;
- cleansing;
- repair
of dykes, ditches, canals, sea/river walls, piles, bridges, levels, ways and other works.

Watlington/Shouldham lie in a drainage-sensitive fen-edge landscape.

Historic Colts sources contain:
- alder carr;
- low-lying damp land;
- ditches / drainage features;
- ways.

But landscape conditions do not prove a MANORIAL works liability.

No Colts court roll, award or custom has yet identified such a legal obligation.

CURRENT RESULT:
LEGAL SURVIVAL CLASS = YES.
COLTS-SPECIFIC HISTORIC LIABILITY = NOT PROVED.

========================================================================
HM. PRESENT SURVIVAL TABLE — PASS 16
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT HISTORICALLY COLTS? SURVIVED IN LAW? CURRENT STATUS
--------------------------- ---------------------------- ------------------- ----------------------------

Lordship/title YES YES Modern chain proved.

Fold / fold liberty YES / strong by 1597 Not Schedule-12 Likely ended/transformed
survivor class by enclosure; award needed.

16s rent 1506 Watlyngton only; Depends on legal No later continuation;
Colts bridge imperfect character weak current candidate.

Advowson Historic Watlyngton right; Separate church Later separated;
exact early Colts bridge regime not current manor right.
imperfect

Minerals NO direct Colts evidence YES HIGHEST-VALUE unresolved
survivor candidate.

Stone/clay/gravel/quarry NO direct Colts evidence YES Same.

Mineral entry/search NO direct Colts evidence YES Same.

Sporting/shooting Wider Hare Estate yes; YES Colts origin missing.
specific Colts no

Warren Bardolf superior yes; YES Colts subgrant/descent
Colts no missing.

Market/fair Superior/Shouldham yes; YES Colts title missing.
Colts no

Piscary Baynard Shouldham yes; YES Colts title missing.
Colts no

Works/dyke liability NO specific custom yet YES Search court/award records.

Commons/waste Historic landscape yes Not as automatic Enclosure transformed;
manorial right physical allotment may
survive as land.

Court baron/leet Historic manor institution NO modern feudal Historic only.
jurisdiction

Heriots/fines/reliefs Historic categories NO — extinguishment Historic only.
regime

Castleward/Waytefee Medieval Wormegay burdens NO Historic only.

========================================================================
HN. PASS 16 — DECISIVE RESEARCH ORDER
========================================================================

The current deed is REMOVED from this list.

1. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP
- fold;
- common;
- waste;
- lord's allotment;
- minerals;
- roads/drains;
- reservations.

2. FULL 1798 SHOULDHAM / SHOULDHAM THORPE AWARD + MAP
- second fold/common extinction gate;
- Colts Farm/parcels;
- warren;
- roads/drains;
- mineral/timber reservations.

3. HARE 2403 ORIGINAL
- exact legal structure of the 1597 fold liberty;
- which manor/right owned which limb.

4. COLTS-SPECIFIC COURT / COPYHOLD RECORDS
- former copyholds;
- minerals;
- sporting;
- rents;
- works liabilities.

5. NRO HARE 5466 + related farm schedules
- reconstruct Colts Farm post-1874.

6. HARE 6374-5 / HARE 6956 c.1900 exchange files
- severance;
- minerals;
- sporting;
- timber;
- physical-estate separation.

7. 1920s ENFRANCHISEMENT / COMPENSATION MATERIAL
- determine whether Schedule-12 rights were preserved against former Colts copyholds.

8. 1943 HARE -> FORESTRY LEASE
- test if sporting reservation can be traced to Colts parcels.

9. HISTORIC MARKET / WARREN / PISCARY GRANTS
only if they can be attached to Colts rather than superior/adjacent manors.

========================================================================
HO. PASS 16 — BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

The project has now reached the correct question.

The current transfer does not need to be proved again.

The 1930 deed already shows the lordship was conveyed with whatever rights/royalties/
members/appurtenances were then subsisting.

The present task is to establish WHAT WAS STILL SUBSISTING IN 1930.

At present:

STRONGEST HISTORIC COLTS RIGHT:
FOLD / FOLD LIBERTY.

BUT:
its chance of surviving as a foldcourse into 1930 now looks poor because statutory
enclosure is the classic legal termination/transformation mechanism for East Anglian
foldcourse.

MOST IMPORTANT POSSIBLE CURRENT RIGHTS:
MINERALS / QUARRY / ANCILLARY WORKING RIGHTS.

WHY:
they are expressly preserved by the 1922 regime and could remain severed from surface
land.

PROBLEM:
no Colts-specific mineral evidence has yet been recovered.

SPORTING / WARREN:
legally capable and there is a genuine modern Hare Estate sporting stream, but no Colts
origin yet.

MARKET / FAIR / PISCARY:
legally capable, but currently fail the specific-Colts ownership test.

WORKS / DRAINAGE:
legally capable, but no Colts custom yet found.

Therefore the highest-value archival attack is no longer the modern deed chain:
it is the ENCLOSURE + COPYHOLD/ENFRANCHISEMENT + ESTATE-SEVERANCE record set.

END OF PASS 16 ADDITION
END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
========================================================================
HP. PASS 17 — FIRST TRUE SURVIVAL-PROOF PASS
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 17 follows the revised rule from PASS 16:

1. Prove the right belonged specifically to Watlington-Colts / Trussbutts.
2. Prove whether it survived enclosure / severance / statutory reform to 1930.
3. If it survived to 1930, the modern conveyancing chain is treated as sufficient for
present-benefit purposes.

No further work is spent proving the current transfer carried the surviving package.

PASS 17 concentrated on:
- the 1749 Watlington enclosure gate;
- the 1794-1798 Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe enclosure gate;
- whether commons/fold/warren survived or were transformed;
- late survival of Shouldham Warren;
- physical Colts estate continuity;
- mineral-value context without importing Tottenhill or wider-Hare rights into Colts.

========================================================================
HQ. SHOULDHAM ENCLOSURE — COMMON RIGHTS WERE CONVERTED INTO ALLOTTED LAND
========================================================================

SHOULDHAM / SHOULDHAM THORPE INCLOSURE ACT:
34 Geo. III c.85 Private
Royal Assent: 23 May 1794.

The statutory title expressly covered:

- common fields;
- half-year lands;
- lammas meadows;
- commons;
- waste lands;

within Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe otherwise Garboise Thorpe.

Modern list-of-acts source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acts_of_the_Parliament_of_Great_Britain_from_1794

The surviving published 1798 commissioners' schedule covers:
- public allotments;
- private allotments;
- public roads;
- private roads;
- bridle roads;
- footpaths;
- drain;
- fences;
- rules/orders.

Bibliographic source:
https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/titel/1055420672

DIRECT SURVIVAL / TRANSFORMATION EVIDENCE:

1. SHOULDHAM POORS' LAND AND FUEL ALLOTMENT
Charity Commission charity no. 207556.

The Charity Commission identifies its governing instrument as:
"INCLOSURE AWARD 1794 SEE P.R. 29.(1) P.520"

and its object as the general benefit of poor persons / fuel for the poor.

Official current charity record:
https://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/en/charity-search/-/charity-details/207556/governing-document

2. WHITE 1845 — SHOULDHAM
White states:
"The Fuel Allotment, 95A., was awarded at the enclosure, in 1794."

Source:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/s/shouldham/white1845.shtml

3. WHITE 1845 — SHOULDHAM THORPE
White separately states:
"The Fuel Allotment, 60A., was awarded in 1794."

Source:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/s/shouldham_thorpe/white1845.shtml

4. 1796 SALE NOTICE — COMMON RIGHTS CONVERTED TO LAND
A contemporary newspaper notice for a Shouldham Thorpe estate explicitly advertised that
the messuages had rights of common and that the LAND TO BE ALLOTTED IN LIEU THEREOF
would be a valuable acquisition capable of being added to the farm.

Modern transcription/source-finder:
https://stokeferrydhg.org/1750-1799-a-chronicle-of-events-in-the-village-of-stoke-ferry-norfolk/

PASS 17 CONCLUSION:

This is strong direct evidence of the ENCLOSURE MECHANISM actually operating locally:

COMMON / LAMMAS / OPEN-FIELD RIGHTS
->
SPECIFIC ALLOTMENTS OF LAND

Therefore a historic Colts common/fold-associated grazing entitlement should NOT be
presumed to have survived after enclosure as the same incorporeal manorial incident.

If Colts had qualifying common/fold rights, the likely post-enclosure survivor would be:
- an allotment;
- compensation;
- substituted land;
- a defined easement/right;
rather than the old open-field/customary right itself.

CRITICAL COLTS LIMIT:
The public evidence above does NOT identify which allotment was made specifically in
respect of Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts or Colts Farm.

That still requires the signed award/map/claims.

========================================================================
HR. NEW SHOULDHAM AWARD FINDER — P.R. 29.(1) P.520
========================================================================

The Charity Commission's current governing-document record supplies a previously
unrecorded archival-style citation:

P.R. 29.(1) p.520

for the Shouldham Inclosure Award 1794.

STATUS:
[Verified as the citation recorded by the Charity Commission.]

The meaning/custody of "P.R. 29.(1)" has NOT yet been resolved.

It may be:
- a parish record volume;
- charity/endowment register reference;
- copied award record;
- another administrative source.

PASS 17 PRIORITY:
Trace P.R. 29.(1) p.520 through:
- Norfolk Record Office parish records;
- Charity Commission historic files;
- parish/charity deposited records;
- award enrollment/copy registers.

This is now a concrete award-tracing key rather than a generic "find full 1798 award"
instruction.

========================================================================
HS. WARREN — UNLIKE FOLD/COMMON, IT SURVIVED ENCLOSURE INTO THE 19TH CENTURY
========================================================================

The warren position materially improves in PASS 17.

EARLY MODERN:
Norfolk Heritage Explorer states that a lease of SHOULDHAM WARREN in 1634 stipulated
the number of rabbits to be supplied to the household.

Official source:
https://www.heritage.norfolk.gov.uk/record-details?TNF2329-Rabbit-Warrens-Article=

Other local/official heritage material places Shouldham Warren in existence by:
1616.

POST-ENCLOSURE:
The Borough Council's Shouldham conservation statement says:

- in 1836 a WARRRENER managed the rabbit warren in the NORTH of the parish;
- the Hare Estate remained dominant in the parish.

Official local-authority source:
https://www.west-norfolk.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/1928/shouldham_conservation_area_leaflet.pdf

WHITE 1845:
Shouldham had 3,775 acres.
Of those, 2,674 acres:
"including a rabbit warren"
belonged to:
SIR THOMAS HARE, BART.,
described as lord of the manor.

Source:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/s/shouldham/white1845.shtml

This is powerful survival evidence.

TIMELINE:
1616 / 1634
commercial/manorial warren in Shouldham
|
v
1794-1798 enclosure
|
v
1836
warrener still managing rabbit warren
|
v
1845
2,674 Hare acres expressly INCLUDE a rabbit warren
|
v
1847-1890
extensive tree planting on former warren
|
v
1943
Hare Estate -> Forestry Commission 999-year lease
with sporting rights retained by "the estate"
|
v
modern Shouldham Warren / Sincks

The 1847-1890 tree-planting chronology is given in West Norfolk walking/heritage
material:
https://explorewestnorfolk.co.uk/trails/shouldham-warren-walk-22/

PASS 17 CONCLUSION:
The local warren clearly survived the parish enclosure process as a real landed/economic
feature into the nineteenth century.

This is VERY different from the foldcourse/common-right position.

========================================================================
HT. WARREN — THE CRITICAL COLTS PROBLEM BECOMES ORIGIN, NOT SURVIVAL
========================================================================

Although survival is now strong, the Colts ownership problem remains.

Historic England says:
- Colts/Trussbutts;
- Shouldham Priory manor;
were distinct principal manors before Gawdy acquired both.
They later passed together through Rich/Warwick to Sir John Hare.

Source:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=overview

The 1930 Humphreys -> Edleston deed conveyed:
- Watlington;
- Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham;
- Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts;
- Tottenhill.

It did NOT, in the wording supplied, expressly convey:
"Manor of Shouldham" / "Shouldham Priory Manor."

Therefore:
a rabbit warren belonging historically to the SHOULDHAM PRIORY MANOR or to the wider
Hare freehold estate cannot be imported into Watlington Colts merely because both were
owned by Hare.

PASS 17 GEOGRAPHICAL CLUE:
Historic England places Colts Hall/Colts Farm beside the medieval settlement at
Shouldham village/All Saints area.

The Borough conservation statement places the rabbit warren in the NORTH of the parish.

[Inference]
This geographical separation makes it less likely that the nineteenth-century Warren
was simply the immediate Colts Hall/Colts Farm demesne.

It does NOT prove legal ownership by a different manor.

DECISIVE WARREN DOCUMENTS NOW:
1. 1634 Shouldham Warren lease — identify lessor/title/manor;
2. earlier 1616 reference;
3. Hare field book/rental showing under which manor the Warren was accounted;
4. 1794-1798 award/map showing Warren parcel and ownership;
5. nineteenth-century Hare rentals;
6. 1943 lease plan.

WARREN STATUS AFTER PASS 17:
SURVIVAL TO 19TH/20TH CENTURY = STRONG.
COLTS ORIGIN = STILL UNPROVED.
CURRENT WATLINGTON-WEST WARREN RIGHT = NOT YET CLAIMABLE.

========================================================================
HU. MARKET / FAIRS — THE EVENTS SURVIVED, BUT FRANCHISE TITLE IS STILL MISSING
========================================================================

WHITE 1845 states Shouldham:
- was called "Market Shouldham" in old writings;
- still had TWO fairs for horses, cattle and sheep:
19 September and 11 October.

Source:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/s/shouldham/white1845.shtml

Later directory material likewise records the two fairs.

This proves:
THE FAIR EVENTS SURVIVED ENCLOSURE INTO THE 19TH CENTURY.

It does NOT prove:
- who legally held the fair franchise;
- that the right belonged to Colts rather than Shouldham Priory or another manor;
- that toll/stallage rights accompanied it;
- that the franchise passed in 1930.

CURRENT STATUS:
EVENT CONTINUITY = STRONGER.
COLTS FRANCHISE TITLE = UNPROVED.

Therefore fair/market remains behind warren in priority.

========================================================================
HV. MINERALS — PHYSICAL VALUE IS REAL, BUT DO NOT IMPORT TOTTENHILL RIGHTS
========================================================================

PASS 17 found further strong geological/extraction context.

CURRENT NORFOLK MINERALS PLAN material records:
- Watlington quarrying;
- Home Farm, Watlington: 335,000 tonnes sand/gravel permission;
- West Field, Watlington: 285,000 tonnes permission;
- Watlington Quarry at Tottenhill/Watlington;
- proposed large silica-sand resource around Shouldham/Marham.

Official source:
https://norfolk.oc2.uk/document/72/8153

An archaeological report concerning Watlington/Tottenhill additionally states that the
Tottenhill Inclosure Award recorded:
"Public sand and gravel pits for the use of the inhabitants and repairs to the highways
and turnpike roads."

Source:
https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/catalogue/adsdata/arch-1352-1/dissemination/pdf/Norfolk_grey_lit_reports/GL4004_An_Archaeological_Evaluation_at_Watlington_and_Totten.pdf

IMPORTANT EXCLUSION:
Tottenhill was separately one of the manors in the 1930 deed.

Therefore a Tottenhill award mineral/gravel provision CANNOT be imported as a
Watlington-Colts right.

Its value is methodological:
local enclosure awards DID deal expressly with sand/gravel extraction and pit rights.

That increases the importance of finding the full:
1749 Watlington award
and
1794-1798 Shouldham award
for mineral clauses.

CURRENT MINERAL STATUS:
LEGAL SURVIVAL = STRONG.
REAL LOCAL MINERAL RESOURCE = STRONG.
COLTS-SPECIFIC MINERAL TITLE = STILL ZERO DIRECT PROOF.

========================================================================
HW. PHYSICAL COLTS ESTATE — LATE CONTINUITY CONFIRMED AGAIN
========================================================================

NRO HARE 5466, 222 x 5 is now directly confirmed through TNA Discovery as a post-1874
Hare Estate schedule which expressly includes:

"Colts Farm in Shouldham"

along with other named farms.

Official:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/81c466ba-2759-40d3-b601-12e9249d85f6

Historic England already places Colts Farm across the earlier manor-house earthworks and
shows its early-19th-century / 1843 identity.

This provides a useful parcel bridge:

1633 Colts estate
->
1811-1818 Colts Farm
->
1843 Colts homestall / Further Homestall
->
post-1874 Colts Farm in Hare Estate schedule

RIGHTS VALUE:
HARE 5466 and its related schedules should now be mined for:
- exact acreage;
- field names;
- tenancy terms;
- timber;
- sporting/game;
- pits;
- clay/sand;
- drainage;
- rights retained by landlord.

It does NOT itself prove manorial rights.

========================================================================
HX. FOLD SURVIVAL — PASS 17 HARDENS THE NEGATIVE DIRECTION
========================================================================

PASS 16 assessed fold survival as unlikely.

PASS 17 local enclosure evidence strengthens that assessment.

The 1796 Shouldham Thorpe sale notice explicitly states:
existing RIGHTS OF COMMON
would result in:
LAND TO BE ALLOTTED IN LIEU THEREOF.

The Shouldham/Thorpe Fuel Allotments are direct examples of the same legal transformation.

Therefore [Inference]:
a Colts fold/common grazing entitlement operating through the open-field/common system
would ordinarily be expected to be:
- extinguished as the old right;
- compensated by allotment;
or
- transformed by the award.

The full award is still required before saying:
"the Colts fold was extinguished on date X."

PASS 17 STATUS:
HISTORIC FOLD = STRONG.
SAME FOLD RIGHT SUBSISTING IN 1930 = NOW LOW PROBABILITY.
POSSIBLE SUBSTITUTED LAND/RIGHT = OPEN.

========================================================================
HY. PASS 17 — REVISED SURVIVAL RANKING
========================================================================

1. MINERALS / QUARRIES / WORKING RIGHTS
Legal survival: VERY STRONG.
Colts title: UNPROVED.
Priority: HIGHEST.

2. WARREN / SPORTING
Legal survival: VERY STRONG.
Actual Shouldham survival: STRONG to modern period.
Colts origin: UNPROVED.
Priority: VERY HIGH because a genuine surviving right stream exists.

3. WORKS / DRAINAGE
Legal survival: POSSIBLE.
Colts historic custom: UNPROVED.
Priority: MEDIUM-HIGH once awards/court rolls recovered.

4. MARKET / FAIR
Legal survival: POSSIBLE.
Fair event continuity: STRONG.
Colts franchise title: UNPROVED.
Priority: MEDIUM.

5. PISCARY
Legal survival: POSSIBLE.
Colts title: WEAK.
Priority: LOW-MEDIUM.

6. FOLD
Historic Colts case: STRONG.
Survival to 1930: NOW LOW PROBABILITY as same right.
Search only for substituted allotment/property.

7. COMMONS
Historic: YES.
Local evidence shows conversion to allotments.
Current search should be for substituted LAND, not ancient common right.

8. 16s RENT
Historic: YES in 1506 Watlyngton fine.
Current survival: WEAK unless later legal character is found.

========================================================================
HZ. PASS 17 — DECISIVE NEXT RECORDS
========================================================================

1. TRACE "P.R. 29.(1) p.520"
Charity Commission citation for Shouldham Inclosure Award.

2. FULL SHOULDHAM / SHOULDHAM THORPE AWARD + MAP
search:
- Sir Thomas Hare / Hare predecessors;
- Colts / Colt's Hall / Colt's Farm;
- Warren;
- lord of manor;
- commons/fold;
- sheepwalk;
- sand/gravel/clay/chalk/lime;
- pits;
- timber;
- roads/drains.

3. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON AWARD
same rights extraction.

4. 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN LEASE
identify legal manor/lessor.

5. HARE 5466 FULL SCHEDULES
reconstruct Colts Farm fields and landlord reservations.

6. c.1900 HARE 6374/6375 + HARE 6956
map those Colts parcels into severance/exchange plans.

7. 1920s COPYHOLD / COMPENSATION / ENFRANCHISEMENT
against mapped Colts parcels.

8. 1943 FORESTRY LEASE PLAN
compare Warren/Sincks parcels to historic Colts parcel map.

========================================================================
IA. PASS 17 — BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

PASS 17 is the first pass to produce a real SURVIVAL distinction from local evidence:

COMMONS:
transformed into physical allotments by the local enclosure process.

FOLD:
likely suffered the same extinction/transformation mechanism; same-right survival to
1930 now looks poor.

WARREN:
demonstrably survived enclosure as an actual Hare-owned rabbit warren into the
nineteenth century and later sporting/woodland estate.

Therefore the warren is now a stronger substantive survivor than the fold.

BUT:
the problem has inverted.

For fold:
COLTS ORIGIN = strong; SURVIVAL = weak.

For warren:
SURVIVAL = strong; COLTS ORIGIN = weak/unproved.

MINERALS:
SURVIVAL LAW = strong; LOCAL VALUE = strong; COLTS ORIGIN = entirely unproved.

That defines the next phase precisely:
find the records that connect either the WARREN or MINERALS specifically to
Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts, while using the enclosure awards to close the FOLD/COMMON
question.

END OF PASS 17 ADDITION
END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
========================================================================
IB. PASS 18 — SURVIVAL-PROOF PHASE: WARREN ORIGIN + LIME/MINERAL LEAD
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 18 continues the survival-only method.

Current rule:
- prove a right belonged specifically to Watlington-Colts / Trussbutts;
- determine whether that right survived or was transformed/extinguished before 1930;
- if still subsisting in 1930, treat the modern benefit-side transmission as sufficient.

This pass concentrated on:
1. tracing the full Shouldham enclosure award using P.R. 29.(1) p.520;
2. finding the underlying 1634 Shouldham Warren lease;
3. recovering the full 1749 Watlington award;
4. testing whether the post-enclosure Warren can be assigned to Colts;
5. testing minerals/lime against actual Shouldham land evidence;
6. identifying late physical Colts estate material capable of linking rights to parcels.

PASS 18 did NOT recover:
- the full 1749 Watlington award/map;
- the full 1794/1798 Shouldham award/map;
- the meaning/current custody of P.R. 29.(1) p.520;
- the original/reference for the 1634 Shouldham Warren lease.

Those are unresolved, not disproved.

========================================================================
IC. WARREN ORIGIN IS NOW MORE CAUTIOUS — 1634 LEASE POST-DATES MANOR UNITY
========================================================================

Historic England records that:
- Colt's manor / Trussbutt's was one of three principal Shouldham manors;
- Judge Gawdy acquired Colts AND Shouldham Priory manor;
- the united manors later passed through the Warwick/Rich line;
- ultimately, in 1632, to Sir John Hare of Stow Bardolph.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=overview

The Norfolk Heritage Explorer then states that:
a lease of SHOULDHAM WARREN in 1634 stipulated the number of rabbits to be supplied
to the household.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
https://www.heritage.norfolk.gov.uk/record-details?TNF2329-Rabbit-Warrens-Article=

CRITICAL CHRONOLOGY:
1632:
Hare receives the already UNITED Colts + Shouldham Priory manor estate.

1634:
Shouldham Warren lease.

PASS 18 CONSEQUENCE:
Even if the 1634 lease is recovered and proves the Hare family as lessor, that fact
ALONE will not identify the Warren's ORIGINAL MANOR.

By 1634 Hare could lease a warren inherited from:
- Colts/Trussbutts;
- Shouldham Priory manor;
- another Hare freehold/component;
because those interests were already under common ownership.

Therefore the 1634 lease remains decisive only if its operative wording identifies:
- the manor;
- the warren as parcel/appurtenance of a named manor;
- prior title;
- boundaries;
- reserved rabbits/game;
- rent/accounting stream.

The Warren-origin problem therefore moves backward:
pre-1632 evidence is now at least as important as the 1634 lease.

========================================================================
ID. NINETEENTH-CENTURY "SHOULDHAM MANOR" REMAINS DISTINCT IN THE RECORD
========================================================================

WHITE 1845 — SHOULDHAM:
- 2,674 acres, including a rabbit warren, belonged to Sir Thomas Hare;
- Sir Thomas Hare is called "the lord of the manor";
- the same entry immediately recounts the separate history of Shouldham Priory,
describing the priory as endowed with "this manor".

SOURCE:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/s/shouldham/white1845.shtml

KELLY 1896 — SHOULDHAM:
Thomas Leigh Hare is again called lord of the manor.

SOURCE-FINDER:
https://forebears.io/england/norfolk/shouldham

KELLY 1896 — MARHAM:
Thomas Leigh Hare is described more specifically as:
"lord of the manor of New Hall and Shouldham".

SOURCE-FINDER:
https://forebears.io/england/norfolk/marham

STATUS:
[Verified for the directory wording at transcription level.]

PASS 18 INFERENCE:
This makes it increasingly unsafe to identify the Hare-owned nineteenth-century
Shouldham Warren with WATLINGTON COLTS solely because Hare also owned Colts.

The directories continue to recognise a named SHOULDHAM manor under Hare ownership.

That does not prove that Shouldham Warren legally belonged to the former Priory manor.
It does, however, reinforce the need for a specific Colts bridge.

WARREN STATUS:
- survival: STRONG;
- wider Hare/Shouldham ownership: STRONG;
- Colts origin: STILL UNPROVED and now subject to a stronger separate-manor caution.

========================================================================
IE. PHYSICAL ESTATE SEPARATION SURVIVED VERY LATE — COLTS FARM AND SHOULDHAM ABBEY FARM
========================================================================

NRO HARE 5466, 222 x 5
post-1874 Hare Estate schedules.

OFFICIAL TNA DISCOVERY DESCRIPTION:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/81c466ba-2759-40d3-b601-12e9249d85f6

The catalogue lists, among multiple distinct Hare Estate units:

- COLTS FARM IN SHOULDHAM;
- SHOULDHAM ABBEY FARM;
- Heath Farm in Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe;
- Thorpe Manor Farm;
and other farms.

THIS IS AN IMPORTANT STRUCTURAL FINDING.

Although the manors had been under common ownership for centuries, the physical estate
still maintained:
COLTS FARM
and
SHOULDHAM ABBEY FARM
as separately named estate units after 1874.

RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:
Do NOT use nineteenth-century Hare ownership of:
- Warren;
- sporting;
- lime ground;
- sand pits;
or other resources
as Colts evidence without parcel/accounting linkage.

HARE 5466 has therefore become much more important than a simple "Colts Farm existed"
citation.

The full schedules should be inspected for each named farm's:
- acreage;
- field names;
- rents;
- tenant;
- game/sporting reservation;
- minerals;
- pits;
- timber;
- drainage;
- landlord's rights.

If Warren / lime / mineral parcels can be shown under "Colts Farm" rather than
"Shouldham Abbey Farm" or another named unit, that would materially change the survival
assessment.

========================================================================
IF. NEW LIME / LIMESTONE EXTRACTION LEAD — SHOULDHAM "DIGGING GROUND"
========================================================================

The Borough Council's official Shouldham conservation statement contains a significant
new economic-land-use detail.

It states that:
- the open chalk downs in the SOUTH-EAST corner of Shouldham parish
provided NINE ACRES of "DIGGING GROUND";
- the digging ground supplied a LIME KILN;
- before enclosure, Sir John Hare owned field strips throughout the parish amounting
to 65% of the open fields, excluding commons;
- much of the parish remained in the Hare Estate.

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
https://www.west-norfolk.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/1928/shouldham_conservation_area_leaflet.pdf

A 1795/1796 Shouldham enclosure road notice independently refers to a direction post
standing in:

"LIMEKILN SHIFT"

in Shouldham.

The same notice identifies several nearby parcels as belonging to Thomas Hare,
including:
- Bowel Wood;
- Cherry Close;
- New Close;
- Oxtorths [?].

SOURCE / TRANSCRIPTION:
https://stokeferrydhg.org/1750-1799-a-chronicle-of-events-in-the-village-of-stoke-ferry-norfolk/

THIS IS A REAL RIGHTS-SURVIVAL LEAD because:
limestone / lime / clay / stone / gravel and associated pits/quarries are precisely
among the categories capable of surviving the 1922 property reforms if they constituted
a lord's/manorial proprietary right.

BUT THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT YET PROVE:
- that the nine-acre digging ground belonged to Hare;
- that it belonged to Colts Farm;
- that lime extraction was a MANORIAL right rather than use of ordinary land/common;
- that the lord reserved the mineral;
- that it survived enclosure as a separate mineral title.

Therefore this is classified as:

HISTORIC SHOULDHAM LIME / EXTRACTION ACTIVITY = PROVED.
HARE PARISH-DOMINANCE / NEARBY OWNERSHIP = PROVED.
WATLINGTON-COLTS LIMESTONE/LIME RIGHT = UNPROVED.

DECISIVE NEXT RECORD:
the full Shouldham award/map and HARE 5466 parcel schedules.

========================================================================
IG. BGS CONFIRMS EXTRACTABLE SAND / CARSTONE AT SHOULDHAM WARREN
========================================================================

British Geological Survey memoir:
King's Lynn and The Wash, Sheet 145.

BGS records:
- an OLD SAND PIT at Shouldham Warren,
grid reference approximately TF 6836 1133;
- weathered Carstone sands;
- mapped Carstone/Leziate geological units around Shouldham/Warren.

OFFICIAL BGS:
https://webapps.bgs.ac.uk/memoirs/docs/B01590.html

STATUS:
[Verified geological/extraction evidence.]

RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:
This materially strengthens the factual proposition that:
- mineral/sand/Carstone resources existed;
- actual extraction took place at Shouldham Warren.

It does NOT identify:
- owner of the minerals;
- manor under which they were held;
- whether rights were severed from surface;
- whether Colts had any entitlement.

It therefore increases the VALUE of the mineral-title search but not the evidential
strength of the current Colts mineral claim.

========================================================================
IH. NEW MEDIEVAL/EARLY-TUDOR SOURCE-FINDER — ACC 2022/153
========================================================================

The National Archives 2023 accessions return for Norfolk Record Office records:

ACC 2022/153

Janet Hammond local-history collection, including:

"part of an extent of ?Shouldham from Hare MSS or possibly Fincham or Runcton Holme
[late 15th-early 16th century]"

OFFICIAL SOURCE:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/accessions/2023/23returns/23ac153.htm

STATUS:
[Verified as an accession description; the archive itself expresses uncertainty about
the place/manuscript identity.]

POTENTIAL VALUE:
If the fragment is genuinely Shouldham and from Hare MSS it could fall close to:
- the late Trussbut/Colt period;
- the 1506 Watlyngton rights bundle;
- the pre-1597 Colt title.

It could potentially identify:
- tenants;
- parcels;
- rents;
- field names;
- demesne;
- fold/common arrangements.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
Do not use it as evidence until the fragment is identified.

This is a high-quality SOURCE-FINDER only.

========================================================================
II. 1749 WATLINGTON AWARD — PASS 18 NEGATIVE RESULT
========================================================================

Targeted public searches again found:
- the 1749 Watlington Inclosure Act;
- NRO MS 7245, 7B4, the extract of award/allotment to Elizabeth Roberts;

but no public full award/map/claims book.

KNOWN NRO ITEM:
MS 7245, 7B4
"Extract of Award under Watlington Inclosure Act. Allotment to Elizabeth Roberts"

URL:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/extract-of-award-under-watlington-inclosure-act-allotment-to-elizabeth-roberts

PASS 18 STATUS:
FULL AWARD / MAP = STILL NOT FOUND ON PUBLIC WEB.

This is not evidence that the full award is lost.

SEARCH MUST NOW SHIFT FROM TITLE SEARCH TO:
- parent fonds of MS 7245;
- Norwich Public Library Manuscript Collection;
- deposited parish records;
- enrolled/certified copies;
- estate copies in Hare/Plestow/Coote papers;
- charity/title deeds generated by the award.

========================================================================
IJ. P.R. 29.(1) p.520 — PASS 18 NEGATIVE RESULT
========================================================================

Multiple targeted searches did not resolve the Charity Commission citation:

"P.R. 29.(1) p.520"

from the governing document of Shouldham Poors' Land and Fuel Allotment.

The citation remains exact and useful, but its archive/fonds expansion is currently
unknown.

STATUS:
UNRESOLVED — DO NOT INVENT AN EXPANSION.

Priority routes:
- Charity Commission historic scheme/endowment files;
- Norfolk parish records;
- NRO charity records;
- parish council/vestry records;
- enrolled award/copy books.

========================================================================
IK. 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN LEASE — PASS 18 NEGATIVE RESULT
========================================================================

Targeted public search found the official Norfolk Heritage Explorer reference to the
1634 Warren lease but did NOT recover:
- archive shelfmark;
- lessor;
- lessee;
- rent;
- manor name;
- boundaries;
- original image/transcription.

Therefore the current statement remains only:

A 1634 Shouldham Warren lease existed and stipulated rabbit deliveries to the household.

The key origin question cannot be answered until the underlying record or the source
cited by the Norfolk Heritage article is recovered.

NEXT SEARCH SHOULD INCLUDE:
- Hare estate accounts/leases around 1632-1635;
- field books;
- household rabbit/game accounts;
- estate rental books;
- the bibliography/source notes behind TNF2329.

========================================================================
IL. PASS 18 — RIGHTS-SURVIVAL EFFECT
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 18 EFFECT
----------------------------- --------------------------------------------------

Fold / fold liberty No rescue of same-right survival.
Enclosure remains probable extinction/transformation.
Search substitute allotment/property only.

Commons Same: local process demonstrably converts commons
to allotted land.

Warren SURVIVAL remains strong.
ORIGIN problem is now more acute:
1634 lease post-dates 1632 union of Colts + Priory.
Named Shouldham manor persists under Hare later.

Sporting Same wider-estate modern survival.
Must be parcel/manor-linked to Colts.

Limestone / lime NEW serious historic extraction lead:
nine-acre Shouldham "digging ground" feeding lime kiln
+ Limekiln Shift.
Colts ownership/manorial character unproved.

Sand / Carstone BGS proves old sand pit at Shouldham Warren.
No legal title inference.

Minerals generally Remain highest-value current-right target.
New extraction evidence increases practical importance,
not Colts-specific proof.

Colts physical estate HARE 5466 now more powerful:
Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm remain separately
named estate units post-1874.

Market/fair No new legal title evidence.

Piscary No new Colts bridge.

Works/drainage No new Colts-specific custom.

16s rent No later continuation found.

========================================================================
IM. PASS 18 — REVISED DECISIVE ORDER
========================================================================

1. FULL HARE 5466, 222 x 5 SCHEDULE PACKAGE
because Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm are separately named.
Extract every field / acreage / reservation / tenancy term.

2. FULL SHOULDHAM INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP
use P.R. 29.(1) p.520 as an exact search key.
Specifically map:
- Colts Farm;
- Abbey Farm;
- Warren;
- nine-acre digging ground;
- Limekiln Shift;
- commons/fold;
- fuel allotment;
- pits/minerals;
- drains/roads.

3. 1749 WATLINGTON AWARD + MAP
parent fonds / estate copies / enrolment rather than general web search.

4. PRE-1632 WARREN EVIDENCE
because the 1634 Hare lease cannot alone identify original manor after unity.

5. 1634 WARREN LEASE
still required for boundaries/terms/accounting stream.

6. ACC 2022/153 EXTENT FRAGMENT
identify whether genuinely Shouldham/Hare and whether it contains Colt-era parcels.

7. c.1900 HARE EXCHANGE PAPERS
after Colts parcels are reconstructed from HARE 5466 + award.

8. 1920s COPYHOLD / COMPENSATION FILES
for mineral reservations over the identified Colts parcels.

========================================================================
IN. PASS 18 — BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

PASS 18 does not yet prove a new current Watlington-West substantive right.

It DOES sharpen where the answer is likely to come from.

WARREN:
The fact that it survives is no longer the real problem.
The problem is proving it belonged specifically to Colts before the manors were united.
The 1634 lease is too late to solve origin by chronology alone unless its wording names
the manor/title.

MINERALS / LIME:
A much more concrete historic extraction landscape now exists:
- nine-acre Shouldham digging ground feeding a lime kiln;
- Limekiln Shift;
- old sand pit / Carstone at Shouldham Warren.

This moves minerals from an abstract legal survivor class into a genuine local historic
economic activity.

BUT:
there is still no Colts-specific mineral title.

PHYSICAL ESTATE:
The post-1874 Hare schedules distinctly list both:
- Colts Farm;
- Shouldham Abbey Farm.

That is exactly the separation needed to test whether warren/mineral parcels belonged to
the Colts estate or another Hare estate component.

Therefore HARE 5466 has become the immediate practical priority.

END OF PASS 18 ADDITION
END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER
========================================================================
IO. PASS 19 — SURVIVAL PROOF: WARREN ORIGIN NOW MATERIALly WEAKER AS COLTS
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 19 continues the survival-only model.

The modern transfer chain is no longer treated as a research problem.

The sole questions remain:
A. DID THE RIGHT BELONG TO WATLINGTON COLTS / TRUSBUTTS?
B. DID IT SURVIVE TO 1930?

PASS 19 materially changes the WARREN assessment.

The survival of a Shouldham/Hare rabbit-warren and later sporting stream remains strong.

However, new medieval institutional evidence plus nineteenth-century estate separation
makes it materially less safe to suppose that the surviving Warren originated as a
right of Watlington Colts.

This is not yet a disproof of Colts ownership.

It is a stronger competing-origin problem.

========================================================================
IP. HARE 5466 + WHITE 1845 — OPERATIONAL ESTATE SEPARATION IS NOW STRONG
========================================================================

NRO HARE 5466, 222 x 5
post-1874 Hare Estate schedules.

OFFICIAL DISCOVERY:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/81c466ba-2759-40d3-b601-12e9249d85f6

The schedule package separately names:
- COLTS FARM IN SHOULDHAM;
- SHOULDHAM ABBEY FARM;
- Heath Farm;
- Thorpe Manor Farm;
and numerous other Hare units.

PASS 19 adds an earlier operational snapshot from White 1845.

WHITE 1845 — SHOULDHAM:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/s/shouldham/white1845.shtml

The directory separately lists:

WILLIAM BRIGHTON — warrener

FARMERS:
JOHN BIRD — Abbey Farm
CHARLES LEMMON — Colts Hall
RICHARD RAMM — Button Fen
and others.

This is important circumstantial separation.

At one date under the Hare estate:
- the WARREN has a dedicated warrener;
- ABBEY FARM has a named farmer;
- COLTS HALL has a different named farmer.

[Inference]
This is consistent with the Warren being operated as a distinct Hare-estate unit rather
than simply as part of the Colts Hall tenancy.

It does NOT prove:
- a separate legal title to the Warren;
- that the Warren belonged to Shouldham Priory manor;
- that Colts had no warren right.

But when combined with HARE 5466's later separate Colts Farm / Abbey Farm naming, it
materially weakens any assumption:

HARE WARREN = COLTS.

========================================================================
IQ. MAJOR MEDIEVAL COMPETING-WARREN LEAD — SHOULDHAM PRIORY POSSESSED FREE WARREN
========================================================================

Victoria County History, Norfolk, vol. II, Shouldham Priory:

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/PageVCH_Norfolk_2.djvu/452

VCH records:

1. Geoffrey FitzPiers founded Shouldham Priory and granted it:
- HIS MANOR OF SHOULDHAM, WITH ITS MEMBERS;
- All Saints and St Margaret churches at Shouldham;
- Garboisthorpe;
- Stoke Ferry;
- Wereham.

2. William de Mandeville later gave the priory the messuage and demesne lands which the
founder had reserved.

3. The Clackclose hundred jury in 1275 found that:
THE PRIOR OF SHOULDHAM HAD HAD A GRANT OF FREE WARREN FROM HENRY III.

VCH supplies source references:
- Hundred Rolls (Record Commission), vol. I, pp.458, 519, 532, 538;
- Quo Warranto Rolls, p.489.

STATUS:
[Verified as VCH's statement and source references.]

THIS IS A MAJOR COMPETING-ORIGIN LEAD.

It proves that the SHOULDHAM PRIORY institutional estate itself possessed a royal
free-warren franchise somewhere within its holdings.

It means the surviving early-modern/modern Shouldham Warren no longer has only two
abstract possibilities:
- Colts;
- generic wider estate.

There is now a documented medieval PRIORY free-warren franchise to investigate.

========================================================================
IR. CRITICAL CAUTION — VCH DOES NOT LOCALISE THE FREE-WARREN GRANT
========================================================================

DO NOT overstate IQ.

VCH says:
"the prior of Shouldham had had grant of free warren from Henry III."

It does NOT, in that sentence, list the places covered by the warren charter.

Shouldham Priory held property in numerous Norfolk parishes.

There is also independent secondary evidence that the Priory's manor of
CAVENHAM / KAVENHAM in the Wereham area had a Henry III charter including:
- free warren;
- free bull and boar;
- other manorial liberties.

SOURCE-FINDER:
https://feudaltitles.com/titles-index-k-o

This raises a serious identification caution:

The VCH/1275 statement may concern:
- Cavenham;
- Shouldham itself;
- several priory manors;
- or a broader grant.

We CANNOT yet equate:
"Prior of Shouldham had free warren"
with
"the later physical Shouldham Warren came from the Priory manor of Shouldham."

DECISIVE PRIMARY SOURCES:
1. Hundred Rolls vol. I, pp.458, 519, 532, 538;
2. Quo Warranto Rolls p.489;
3. underlying Henry III charter/Charter Roll.

The localities in the original grant must be read before assigning this franchise.

PASS 19 RESULT:
PRIORY ORIGIN is now a SERIOUS COMPETING HYPOTHESIS.
It is not yet proved.

========================================================================
IS. PRIORY TENURE WAS A DISTINCT MEDIEVAL SHOULDHAM ESTATE STREAM
========================================================================

Mapping the Medieval Countryside independently records a distinct Priory fee:

SHOULDHAM, WEREHAM AND STOKE FERRY
1 1/2 knight's fee
held by:
THE PRIOR OF SHOULDHAM
valued at £7 10s.

DIRECT DIGITAL EDITION:
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/22-467/507.html

This is separate documentary structure from the Trussbut/Wormegay fee stream already
traced in:
- 1403 Laurence Trussebute;
- 1427 Thomas Trusbut + parceners.

SIGNIFICANCE:
There really were parallel medieval estate/fee streams touching Shouldham:
- Trussbut/Colts predecessor;
- Shouldham Priory;
- other superior/adjacent interests.

The Priory-free-warren lead therefore sits within a genuinely distinct institutional
landholding structure and cannot be dismissed as mere monastery-name noise.

Again:
this does NOT prove the later Warren descended from the Priory.
It strengthens the competing-origin case.

========================================================================
IT. HARE'S COMMON OWNERSHIP REMAINS A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION
========================================================================

Historic England:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=overview

shows:
- Colts/Trussbutts and Shouldham Priory manor were distinct;
- Judge Gawdy acquired both;
- they later passed together;
- by 1632 Sir John Hare held the united manors.

Other Hare acquisitions reinforce the problem.

HARE 3083/2 — 1611:
Shouldham Thorpe / Foston / Russells package.

https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/4a8a576e-85b9-42a6-8ea7-b99900bbbd93

HARE 3085 — 1628:
Sir John Hare acquisition involving:
- Thorpe / Shouldham Thorpe / Garboisthorpe;
- Foston Russels;
- Gawsells.

https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/297d3b1d-dad8-42d6-b050-1bcf5e0e2de1

Therefore by the seventeenth century "Hare estate" could contain rights derived from
multiple independently acquired manorial streams.

PASS 19 RULE:
No Hare-era right is a Colts right until:
- the deed names Colts;
- the parcel is in Colts Farm;
- the rental/account is under Colts;
or
- a prior title bridge establishes descent.

========================================================================
IU. WARREN GEOGRAPHY — FURTHER CIRCUMSTANTIAL SEPARATION FROM THE COLTS CORE
========================================================================

Historic England gives Colts Hall:
National Grid Reference
TF 67844 08887

https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1152184?section=comments-and-photos

BGS records the old sand pit at Shouldham Warren at approximately:
TF 6836 1133.

https://webapps.bgs.ac.uk/memoirs/docs/B01590.html

Approximate difference:
- about 0.5 km east;
- about 2.4 km north.

The Warren/extraction core is therefore around 2.5 km north of the Colts Hall core.

Norfolk Heritage Explorer places the medieval Colts settlement behind Colts Hall on the
east side of the village, whereas Fair Stead Market is northwest of the village.

https://www.heritage.norfolk.gov.uk/record-details?uid=TNF1575

[Inference]
Geography is not title.

However, the current evidence does not show the Warren physically centred on the known
Colts demesne/homestall.

Combined with:
- separate warrener;
- separate Colts Hall farmer;
- separate Abbey Farm farmer;
- HARE 5466 separate Colts/Abbey farm units;
the geographical evidence further weakens casual attribution of the Warren to Colts.

It does NOT disprove a detached Colts parcel or incorporeal warren right.

========================================================================
IV. ENCLOSURE — "ABBEY COMMON" IS A DIRECT NAMED COMPETING LANDSCAPE
========================================================================

The 1796 Shouldham enclosure commissioners' road notice describes a road:

from Pound Green
north to:
"ABBEY COMMON IN SHOULDHAM"

and then over part of Abbey Common.

The same notice separately identifies Thomas Hare-owned parcels such as:
- Bowel Wood;
- Cherry Close;
- New Close;
- Oxtorths [?].

SOURCE:
https://stokeferrydhg.org/1750-1799-a-chronicle-of-events-in-the-village-of-stoke-ferry-norfolk/

STATUS:
[Verified at modern transcription level.]

SIGNIFICANCE:
"Abbey Common" is direct evidence that the enclosure-era landscape retained an expressly
Abbey-associated place/common name.

It does NOT prove legal ownership by Shouldham Priory manor in 1796.

But it is another reason to reject:
"all Shouldham common land = Colts."

FOLD / COMMON CONSEQUENCE:
The full award must identify:
- who claimed through Colts;
- who claimed through Abbey/Shouldham manor;
- allotments made in right of each;
rather than treating parish-level rights as one bundle.

========================================================================
IW. MARKET / FAIR — SPATIAL EVIDENCE DOES NOT HELP COLTS
========================================================================

Norfolk Heritage Explorer states:
- the medieval settlement lay behind Colts Hall, east of the modern village;
- the twice-yearly livestock "Fair Stead Market" site is placed northwest of the village
in Fairstead Plantation;
- a full-time market was operating by 1334.

SOURCE:
https://www.heritage.norfolk.gov.uk/record-details?uid=TNF1575

The Forestry plan also places Fair Stead in the northwest landscape.

PASS 19 RESULT:
The franchise EVENT/history remains real.

But neither documentary title nor geography presently links it to Colts.

The physical market/fair site is not centred on the known Colts Hall estate core.

Therefore market/fair drops slightly in priority:
legal survivability exists,
but Colts ownership remains entirely unproved.

========================================================================
IX. MAF 9 / MAF 13 / MAF 27 — EXACT 1920s SURVIVAL-RECORD ROUTE
========================================================================

The National Archives' Manorial Documents/Lordships guidance identifies the records
created by compulsory enfranchisement.

After the 1922 reforms, where incidents had to be extinguished/compensated:

MAF 13:
agreements/certificates relating to compensation for manorial incidents.

MAF 27:
determinations where compensation was settled/determined.

OFFICIAL TNA GUIDE:
https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/manorial-documents-lordships-how-to-use-manorial-document-register/

Parliamentary written evidence gives useful scale/context:

approximately:
- 25,000 MAF 9 enfranchisement deeds;
- 1,100 MAF 13 records, 1926-1935;
- 480 MAF 27 records, 1936-1951.

SOURCE:
https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/53335/html/

PASS 19 SEARCH RESULT:
No publicly indexed Watlington-Colts / Trussbutts / Shouldham-specific MAF 13 or MAF 27
hit was recovered in the current web search.

THIS IS NOT EVIDENCE THAT NONE EXISTS.

The files may be indexed:
- under copyholder names;
- under parish;
- under another manor style;
- only through Discovery series browsing.

WHY THESE FILES MATTER:
Once former Colts copyhold parcels/tenants are identified, MAF 9/13/27 can potentially
show:
- what incidents were extinguished;
- compensation;
- what was expressly preserved;
- mineral reservations;
- enfranchised parcels;
at exactly the 1926-1930 survival boundary.

This is now one of the strongest direct routes to answering:
WHAT WAS STILL SUBSISTING IN 1930?

========================================================================
IY. MINERALS — REAL EXTRACTION EVIDENCE CURRENTLY SITS OUTSIDE THE KNOWN COLTS CORE
========================================================================

PASS 18 established:
- nine-acre Shouldham digging ground feeding a lime kiln;
- Limekiln Shift;
- old sand pit at Shouldham Warren;
- broader sand/Carstone resources.

PASS 19 adds a caution from geography and estate separation.

The strongest identified sand-pit evidence lies around the Warren,
roughly 2.5 km north of Colts Hall.

BGS also records exposures around Abbey Farm.

Meanwhile HARE 5466 keeps:
- Colts Farm;
- Shouldham Abbey Farm;
as separate estate units.

Therefore:
the current extraction evidence is useful as proof of local economic value,
but is presently WEAK evidence for a specific Colts mineral title.

MINERAL STATUS:
- legal survivability: VERY STRONG;
- local extraction/resource: STRONG;
- Colts-specific ownership/reservation: STILL UNPROVED;
- geographic/estate evidence currently points to the need for much finer parcel work.

This does not reduce mineral research priority because a detached Colts parcel is possible
and mineral title can be severed from surface.

It does reduce the evidential weight of merely finding a Shouldham pit.

========================================================================
IZ. NEW WARREN ASSESSMENT — PASS 19
========================================================================

Previous position:
SURVIVAL strong; Colts origin unproved.

PASS 19 position:
SURVIVAL strong.
COLTS ORIGIN unproved and now MATERIALLY DOUBTFUL as an inference.

Reasons:
1. Shouldham Priory had a documented Henry III free-warren franchise somewhere in its
institutional estate.
2. Priory held a distinct Shouldham/Wereham/Stoke Ferry fee.
3. Colts and Priory were separate manors before unification.
4. The 1634 Warren lease post-dates their union.
5. 1845 has separate warrener, Abbey Farm farmer and Colts Hall farmer.
6. Post-1874 HARE 5466 separately maintains Colts Farm and Shouldham Abbey Farm.
7. Warren lies materially north of the known Colts Hall core.
8. Hare owned many other nearby manor streams.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
None of those facts proves:
THE WARREN WAS PRIORY, NOT COLTS.

The correct label is:

SHOULDHAM WARREN SURVIVAL — STRONGLY PROVED.
WATLINGTON-COLTS WARREN — NOT PROVED.
PRIORY/OTHER-HARE ORIGIN — SERIOUS COMPETING HYPOTHESIS.

========================================================================
JA. PASS 19 — DECISIVE NEXT ORDER
========================================================================

1. PRIMARY FREE-WARREN SOURCES:
- Hundred Rolls vol I pp.458, 519, 532, 538;
- Quo Warranto Rolls p.489;
- identify Henry III charter and localities.

Goal:
determine whether Priory free warren included SHOULDHAM itself.

2. HARE 5466 FULL SCHEDULES:
compare:
- Colts Farm;
- Abbey Farm;
- Warren;
- lime/pits;
- tenants;
- reservations.

3. FULL SHOULDHAM INCLOSURE AWARD/MAP:
resolve:
- Abbey Common;
- Colts claims/allotments;
- Warren;
- mineral/lime ground.

4. MAF 9/13/27:
after names/parcels are reconstructed,
search former Colts copyholds for extinguished and preserved rights.

5. PRE-1632 WARREN RECORDS:
determine which manor accounted for the warren before Gawdy/Hare unity.

6. 1634 WARREN LEASE:
use wording/boundaries/accounting stream, not lessor identity alone.

7. ACC 2022/153:
identify possible Shouldham/Hare late medieval extent.

8. 1749 WATLINGTON AWARD:
continue parent-fonds / estate-copy search.

========================================================================
JB. PASS 19 — NEW SOURCE URLS / SOURCE-FINDERS
========================================================================

1. VCH Norfolk II — Shouldham Priory:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/PageVCH_Norfolk_2.djvu/452

2. Mapping the Medieval Countryside — Priory's Shouldham/Wereham/Stoke Ferry fee:
https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/22-467/507.html

3. Priory free-warren/Cavenham caution source-finder:
https://feudaltitles.com/titles-index-k-o

4. Parliamentary evidence — MAF 9 / 13 / 27 quantities and manorial incidents:
https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/53335/html/

5. Existing HARE 5466 official catalogue:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/81c466ba-2759-40d3-b601-12e9249d85f6

6. Existing White 1845 Shouldham:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/s/shouldham/white1845.shtml

7. Existing Norfolk Heritage parish:
https://www.heritage.norfolk.gov.uk/record-details?uid=TNF1575

========================================================================
JC. PASS 19 — BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

PASS 19 produces a useful NEGATIVE-ATTRIBUTION breakthrough.

The surviving Shouldham Warren remains one of the clearest substantive historic rights/
economic privileges to continue into the Hare estate and modern sporting landscape.

But it is now LESS plausible to assume it was a Watlington-Colts right without a deed.

The Priory itself demonstrably possessed free-warren privileges in the medieval period,
held a distinct Shouldham fee stream, and remained physically represented by an Abbey
estate separate from Colts Farm under later Hare management.

The exact locality of the Priory's Henry III free-warren grant is not yet established,
so the Warren cannot yet be reassigned to the Priory.

For minerals:
the same discipline now applies.
Real extraction exists in Shouldham, but the strongest known pit/Warren/Abbey evidence
is not centred on Colts.

The next phase must therefore stop asking:
"Did Shouldham have this right?"

and ask only:
"Which named estate/manor/parcels carried it?"

That is the only route capable of proving a present Watlington-West substantive right.

END OF PASS 19 ADDITION
END OF CUMULATIVE HANDOVER

========================================================================
PASS 20 — EXTENSIVE CONSOLIDATION / PRIMARY-SOURCE ROUND
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 20 was deliberately run as a larger consolidation round rather than a short incremental
search. PASS 19 remains preserved above. Re-found material is not counted as a new discovery.

IMPORTANT CORRECTION / DE-DUPLICATION:
HARE 6956/1-5 and the related HARE 6374/1-4 / HARE 6375/1-72 c.1900 Hare-Hoff exchange
material were re-confirmed during this round, but they had already been recovered in earlier
passes. They are therefore NOT PASS 20 discoveries.

The major objectives in this round were:
- push the Priory/free-warren question back into primary-record editions;
- clarify the earliest Shouldham tenure/endowment layers;
- stop treating the 1616/1634 Warren chronology as proof of a pre-unification origin;
- extract more operational enclosure geography without pretending it proves Colts title;
- re-test the modern sporting-right stream;
- identify searches which have reached the point where archive retrieval is more useful than
repeating broad web queries.

========================================================================
A. NEW 1212 PRIMARY-RECORD EDITION ANCHOR — GEOFFREY FITZ PETER / SULDHAM
========================================================================

DATE:
1212

SOURCE:
Liber Feodorum / Book of Fees, Norfolk and Suffolk return, Clackclose Hundred.
Online transcription of the edited record:
https://www.melocki.org.uk/liber/PartI_1212.html

RELEVANT ENTRY:
Under HUNDREDUM DE CLAKELOS', the return records Geoffrey fitz Peter as holding Suldham
(Shouldham) of the king by the service of half a knight's fee.

The edited text reads:
"Gaufridus filius Petri tenet Suldham ... servicium dimidii militis de domino rege..."
with the editor's footnote indicating that "et" should be read "per".

STATUS:
[Verified at online edited-primary-record transcription level.]
The original 1212 Exchequer return/membrane has not been inspected in this pass.

SIGNIFICANCE:
This is a genuinely new early Shouldham tenure anchor for this project.

It establishes that in the 1212 feudal return Geoffrey fitz Peter was still answerable in the
royal tenure/service framework for Suldham at half a knight's fee.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
It does NOT prove:
- a Colts/Trussbut right;
- that the Priory had no estate in Shouldham;
- that Geoffrey retained every beneficial or demesne interest;
- the locality of the later Priory free-warren grant;
- a modern surviving right.

========================================================================
B. FOUNDATION ENDOWMENT v. 1212 FEUDAL SERVICE — TITLE LAYERS MUST BE SEPARATED
========================================================================

The established VCH account states that Geoffrey fitz Peter founded Shouldham Priory and
endowed the house with his manor of Shouldham and its members.

VCH / British History Online/Wikisource source already in the cumulative ledger:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/PageVCH_Norfolk_2.djvu/452

PASS 20 adds two further source-finders for the foundation chronology:

1. Suffolk Institute article — foundation charter dated A.D. 1199 in the author's chronology,
citing Monasticon Anglicanum vi, p.95 and identifying the witnesses:
https://suffolkinstitute.pdfsrv.co.uk/customers/SuffolkInstitute/2014/01/10/VolumeXXPart11928_TheearlyarchdeaconsofNorthDioceseLLandon_11to35.pdf

2. University of York/Borthwick monastic foundation chronology:
https://www.york.ac.uk/media/borthwick/documents/publications/MRB6.pdf
This gives Shouldham a foundation window of 1193 x 1200 and notes the dating difficulties.

[Inference]
The 1212 royal-service return and the Priory foundation/endowment tradition can coexist only if
we stop treating "gave the manor to the Priory" as a complete description of every feudal,
service, demesne and beneficial layer. The exact legal structure must be reconstructed from the
foundation charter, confirmations and later feudal returns.

This matters directly to the rights project because a franchise cannot safely be assigned merely
from a simplified statement that one institution "had the manor".

NEXT PRIMARY TARGETS:
- the printed/original foundation charter;
- Edward III and Henry IV confirmations which VCH says recite the foundation charter;
- any charter language reserving service, demesne or superior lordship;
- the king-in-chief service entries after 1212.

========================================================================
C. PRIORY FREE WARREN — DIGITAL PRIMARY-EDITION ROUTES FOUND; LOCALITY NOT SOLVED
========================================================================

PASS 19 correctly left the Priory free-warren locality unresolved.

VCH says that in 1275 the Clackclose Hundred jury found that the Prior of Shouldham had a grant
of free warren from Henry III. VCH cites:
- Hundred Rolls, Record Commission, vol. I, pp.458, 519, 532, 538;
- Quo Warranto Rolls, p.489.

PASS 20 has now added direct full-view digital routes to the printed primary-record editions:

ROTULI HUNDREDORUM, VOL. I (1812):
https://books.google.com/books?id=_BtDAAAAcAAJ

PLACITA DE QUO WARRANTO (1818):
https://books.google.com/books?id=-9Y4AQAAMAAJ

STATUS:
[Verified that the cited Record Commission volumes are digitally exposed.]
[Unverified as to the exact free-warren localities because the target entries themselves have not
been securely extracted/read in this pass.]

DO NOT CLAIM:
"Henry III granted the Prior free warren in Shouldham" merely from the VCH sentence.

The grant may cover Shouldham, Cavenham, another Priory estate, or multiple places. PASS 19
already identified Cavenham as a concrete competing locality/source-finder.

DECISIVE TASK:
Read the actual entries at the VCH-cited Hundred Rolls pages and Quo Warranto p.489, identify:
- exact manor/place names;
- charter date;
- grantee wording;
- whether the claim is one charter or more than one;
- whether "libera warrena" extends to Shouldham itself;
- any judgment/allowance language.

========================================================================
D. SHOULDHAM WARREN — 1616 / 1634 CHRONOLOGY TIGHTENED
========================================================================

Existing derivative local history states that Shouldham Warren existed by 1616:
https://explorewestnorfolk.co.uk/trails/shouldham-warren-walk-22/

The official Norfolk Heritage Explorer rabbit-warren article states that a 1634 Shouldham Warren
lease stipulated rabbit deliveries to the household:
https://www.heritage.norfolk.gov.uk/record-details?TNF2329-Rabbit-Warrens-Article=

PASS 20 RESULT:
The underlying 1616 source was NOT recovered.
The underlying 1634 lease shelfmark/text was NOT recovered.

IMPORTANT CHRONOLOGY CORRECTION:
Historic England's Colts site history states that Judge Gawdy acquired both the Colts/Trussbutts
manor and the Shouldham Priory manor, and describes the manors as united before they eventually
passed to Sir John Hare in 1632:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry

Therefore:
[Inference]
The derivative statement "Warren existed by 1616" cannot currently be used as a pre-unification
origin test. The Gawdy consolidation may already have occurred before 1616.

CURRENT SAFE POSITION:
- Shouldham Warren existed by 1616 according to a derivative local-history source;
- an actual Shouldham Warren lease is reported for 1634 by official heritage material;
- both dates may post-date the Colts/Priory combination;
- neither date identifies which pre-combination manor supplied the Warren/franchise/land.

NEW DECISIVE ORDER FOR WARREN ORIGIN:
1. actual Hundred Rolls / Quo Warranto free-warren locality;
2. foundation/confirmation charters;
3. exact Gawdy acquisition/consolidation assurance(s);
4. underlying evidence behind the "by 1616" statement;
5. actual 1634 Warren lease;
6. HARE 5466 full late-19th-century schedules and estate maps.

========================================================================
E. SHOULDHAM ENCLOSURE — OPERATIONAL GEOGRAPHY EXTRACTED MORE DEEPLY
========================================================================

The existing cumulative Stoke Ferry source was re-read in detail:
https://stokeferrydhg.org/1750-1799-a-chronicle-of-events-in-the-village-of-stoke-ferry-norfolk/

It reproduces 1796 newspaper notices issued during the Shouldham / Shouldham Thorpe enclosure.

USEFUL ROAD/PARCEL DETAIL IN THE TRANSCRIPTION INCLUDES:
- a road from Pound Green towards Abbey Common;
- approximately 570 yards over part of Abbey Common;
- Redmore Lane;
- land transcribed as Oxtorths[?], belonging to Thomas Hare;
- Button Fen;
- Cherry Close belonging to Thomas Hare;
- New Close belonging to Thomas Hare;
- James Potter/Porter as occupier in the reproduced notice.

A May 1796 sale notice reproduced on the same page expressly advertised Shouldham Thorpe
messuages with RIGHTS OF COMMON and said that land would be allotted in lieu of those rights
through enclosure.

STATUS:
[Verified only at the level of the modern local transcription of historical newspaper notices.]
The original Norfolk Chronicle pages and full statutory award/map remain preferable.

RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:
[Inference]
This further strengthens the already established direction that old common-field/common grazing
rights in this landscape were being converted into statutory allotments rather than simply
continuing unchanged.

It also gives better map search keys for the full award:
- Abbey Common;
- Button Fen;
- Redmore Lane;
- Cherry Close;
- New Close;
- Thomas Hare holdings.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
Abbey Common is a geographic label, not proof that every interest there belonged to the Priory
manor in law. Likewise, Thomas Hare ownership in 1796 is not proof of Colts provenance.

========================================================================
F. SPORTING RIGHTS — MODERN ACTIVITY CORROBORATION, NOT TITLE PROOF
========================================================================

PASS 20 adds an official Forestry England operational document:

Published Trail Hunting Spreadsheet, 13 December 2019:
https://www.forestryengland.uk/sites/default/files/documents/PublishedTrailHuntingSpreadsheet13.12.19_.pdf

The spreadsheet includes West Norfolk activity entries at:
"The Sincks (Shouldham)" in the 2019/20 season.

STATUS:
[Verified at official operational-record level.]

WHAT THIS ADDS:
It independently corroborates actual sporting/trail-hunting use of the Sincks in the modern period.

WHAT IT DOES NOT ADD:
It does NOT prove:
- ownership of sporting rights;
- that the activity was conducted under the 1943 Hare Estate reservation;
- that the 1943 reservation remains legally unchanged;
- that the rights were ever Colts/Trussbutts rights;
- present benefit-side ownership.

The actual 1943 lease remains decisive.

========================================================================
G. HIGH-VALUE NEGATIVE RESULTS — STOP REPEATING THE SAME BROAD SEARCHES
========================================================================

PASS 20 again failed to recover publicly:

1. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP
Known NRO fragment remains:
MS 7245, 7B4 — extract of award / Elizabeth Roberts allotment.
The full award/map was NOT exposed in this round.

2. FULL HARE 5466, 222 x 5 SCHEDULE PACKAGE
Catalogue-level description remains available and Colts Farm / Shouldham Abbey Farm remain
separately named units, but the detailed schedules themselves were NOT exposed.

3. UNDERLYING 1616 SHOULDHAM WARREN SOURCE
Only the derivative local-history statement was recovered.

4. ACTUAL 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN LEASE
No shelfmark, parties, boundaries, rent or image was recovered.

5. WATLINGTON-COLTS-SPECIFIC MAF 9 / MAF 13 / MAF 27 FILE
Broad parish/manor searching remains insufficient.

6. EXACT FREE-WARREN LOCALITY FROM HUNDRED ROLLS / QUO WARRANTO
Digital record editions are now found, but the cited target entries still require direct
transcription/page inspection.

IMPORTANT RESEARCH CHANGE:
Future work should NOT spend another pass repeating generic web searches for these same items.
It should switch to:
- archive parent-fonds navigation;
- catalogue staff/copy requests;
- exact printed-record page extraction;
- tenant/parcels first, then MAF searches by names and holdings;
- HMLR only after burdened/benefited parcels are identified.

========================================================================
H. PASS 20 — RIGHTS-SURVIVAL EFFECT
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 20 EFFECT
-------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------

Warren / chase SURVIVAL CLASS remains legally strong.
Actual Shouldham Warren survival remains strong.
COLTS ORIGIN remains unproved.
1212 tenure layering + Gawdy pre-1616 union caution make
manor-of-origin attribution more, not less, document-dependent.

Sporting / shooting Wider Hare/Stow/Forestry sporting stream remains strong.
2019 official Sincks activity is corroborative use evidence.
No Colts-title bridge or present owner proved.

Mines / minerals No new Colts reservation found.
Still highest-value survivable category because of legal
survivability + local resource/extraction evidence.
Search must be parcel/enfranchisement based.

Lime / sand / pits No title upgrade.
Enclosure/place-name/extraction clues remain map targets only.
Do not convert a pit/place-name into a mineral title claim.

One free fold No same-right survival rescue.
Historic Colts-linked evidence remains strong.
Enclosure substitute/allotment route remains the serious route.

Commons / waste Transformation direction strengthened by the 1796 notice:
common rights -> land allotted in lieu.
Colts substitute allotment still not found.

Roads / drains / works 1796 road-setting gives better statutory geography.
No Colts-specific proprietary road/drain right proved.

Market / fair No new Colts franchise-title evidence.

Piscary No new Colts evidence.

16s rent No later continuation found.

========================================================================
I. PASS 20 — REVISED SURVIVAL RANKING
========================================================================

1. MINES / MINERALS / QUARRIES / WORKING RIGHTS
Legal survival potential: VERY STRONG.
Local economic/resource evidence: STRONG.
Colts title/reservation: UNPROVED.
Next proof route: HARE 5466 -> enclosure parcel mapping -> enfranchisement/MAF -> modern titles.

2. SPORTING / WARREN
Legal survival potential: VERY STRONG.
Real modern wider-estate survival/use: STRONG.
Colts origin: UNPROVED; Warren has a serious Priory/other-estate competing hypothesis.
Next proof route: free-warren primary text + Gawdy consolidation + 1634 lease + 1943 lease.

3. WORKS / DRAINAGE
Legal survival potential: POSSIBLE in qualifying forms.
Local enclosure evidence: STRONGER operational geography.
Colts custom/title: UNPROVED.

4. MARKET / FAIR
Legal survival potential: POSSIBLE.
Historical local market/fair stream: ESTABLISHED.
Colts franchise ownership: UNPROVED.

5. FOLD
Historic Colts-linked case: STRONG.
Same ancient right surviving after enclosure/1926: LOW on present evidence.
Search for substituted land/property rather than assuming survival of the old fold.

6. COMMONS
Historic existence: ESTABLISHED.
Local statutory conversion: STRONG.
Search substitute allotments/lands, not a continuing ancient common right.

7. 16s RENT
Historic 1506 evidence: DIRECT.
Legal character and later continuation: UNRESOLVED/WEAK.

========================================================================
J. PASS 20 — DECISIVE NEXT ORDER (NON-REPETITIVE)
========================================================================

1. HUNDRED ROLLS / QUO WARRANTO — READ THE ACTUAL TARGET ENTRIES
- Rotuli Hundredorum I pp.458, 519, 532, 538.
- Placita de Quo Warranto p.489.
- identify exact Henry III charter date/localities.

2. GAWDY CONSOLIDATION
Recover the operative assurance(s) by which Colts/Trussbutts and Priory manor came into the
same ownership and determine the date at which they were legally/administratively combined.

3. UNDERLYING 1616 WARREN EVIDENCE + 1634 LEASE
Do not rely on derivative statements for origin allocation.

4. HARE 5466, 222 x 5 — FULL SCHEDULES
Extract Colts Farm, Abbey Farm, Warren/Heath, fields, tenants, acreage, timber, sporting,
minerals/pits and landlord reservations.

5. FULL SHOULDHAM / SHOULDHAM THORPE INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP
Use exact keys:
- Abbey Common;
- Button Fen;
- Redmore Lane;
- Cherry Close;
- New Close;
- P.R. 29.(1) p.520;
- Colts Farm / Abbey Farm / Warren / digging ground / Limekiln Shift[?].

6. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON AWARD + MAP
Work outward from NRO MS 7245, 7B4 and its parent provenance rather than repeating title-only
searches.

7. ACC 2022/153
Identify the late-15th/early-16th-century extent fragment and settle whether it is Shouldham,
Fincham, Runcton Holme or another Hare-manor fragment.

8. MAF 9 / MAF 13 / MAF 27
Search only after exact former copyholders/parcel names are reconstructed from HARE 5466,
enclosure and tithe material.

9. ACTUAL 1943 HARE ESTATE -> FORESTRY COMMISSION LEASE + PLAN
Extract sporting, mineral, timber, entry, access, assignment and successor wording.

10. HMLR / CURRENT PARCEL WORK
Use after specific rights + burdened parcels are identified. A manor/lordship index hit alone
is not proof of a particular right.

========================================================================
K. PASS 20 — NEW DOWNLOAD / SOURCE URLS ADDED TO CUMULATIVE LEDGER
========================================================================

1. Liber Feodorum 1212 — Shouldham/Suldham half-knight service:
https://www.melocki.org.uk/liber/PartI_1212.html

2. Suffolk Institute foundation-charter source-finder:
https://suffolkinstitute.pdfsrv.co.uk/customers/SuffolkInstitute/2014/01/10/VolumeXXPart11928_TheearlyarchdeaconsofNorthDioceseLLandon_11to35.pdf

3. Borthwick / University of York monastic foundation chronology:
https://www.york.ac.uk/media/borthwick/documents/publications/MRB6.pdf

4. Rotuli Hundredorum vol. I full-view route:
https://books.google.com/books?id=_BtDAAAAcAAJ

5. Placita de Quo Warranto full-view route:
https://books.google.com/books?id=-9Y4AQAAMAAJ

6. Forestry England 2019 trail-hunting operational spreadsheet:
https://www.forestryengland.uk/sites/default/files/documents/PublishedTrailHuntingSpreadsheet13.12.19_.pdf

========================================================================
L. PASS 20 — BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

No new present-day Watlington Colts right has been proved in PASS 20.

The most important genuinely new historical evidence is the 1212 Liber Feodorum entry placing
Geoffrey fitz Peter's Suldham holding in a half-knight-service royal tenure framework after the
traditional foundation/endowment date of Shouldham Priory.

[Inference]
That does not weaken the Priory foundation evidence. It shows that the early title history has
multiple legal layers and that rights/franchises must be traced by their own charters and records,
not by a simplified manor-ownership narrative.

The most important practical research gain is that the free-warren source trail has now been
pushed into directly accessible Record Commission editions, while the Warren chronology has been
corrected so that 1616 is no longer treated as necessarily pre-unification.

The current survival conclusion therefore remains:
- MINERALS: legally strong category; Colts title unproved.
- SPORTING/WARREN: real wider-estate survival/use strongly evidenced; Colts origin/title unproved.
- FOLD/COMMONS: historic rights strong, but enclosure transformation is the dominant survival
problem; search substitute allotment/property.
- ROADS/DRAINS/WORKS: local statutory machinery documented; no Colts-specific surviving burden or
benefit identified.
- MARKET/FAIR/PISCARY/RENT: no new Colts survival bridge in this pass.

END PASS 20

========================================================================
M. PASS 21 — CONTINUITY / RESEARCH RULE
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 21 continues from PASS 20 without deleting, replacing or silently upgrading any earlier
finding.

This pass deliberately concentrated on four questions left open at the end of PASS 20:

1. Can the Shouldham Priory / Cavenham free-warren problem be pushed into stronger medieval
documentation?
2. Can the Gawdy/Rich -> Buttes -> Hare sequence be reconstructed closely enough to show which
neighbouring manor streams were being sold or assembled before the c.1632 Hare consolidation?
3. Does the 1867 antiquarian court-roll material connect to the surviving official HARE deeds in a
way that produces a real title mechanism rather than a surname coincidence?
4. Does any new evidence change the CURRENT-RIGHTS result for Watlington Colts / Trussbutts?

CORE RULE RETAINED:
A right found in Gawsells, Shouldham Thorpe, Shouldham Priory, Russells, Foston, Cavenham,
Wormegay or the wider Hare estate is NOT a Watlington-Colts right without a documentary bridge.

========================================================================
N. 1247-1254 PAPAL CONFIRMATION — SULDHAM DEMESNE MANOR + KAVENHAM IN THE
GILBERTINE POSSESSION LIST
========================================================================

A materially stronger medieval source has now been located.

DIGITAL CHARTER EDITION:
University of Toronto Scarborough — DEEDS Project
Charter 05610001

Cartulary source:
An Edition of the Cartulary of Alvingham Priory

CHARTER TYPE:
Papal confirmation

DATE RANGE:
1247-1254

DIRECT DIGITAL TEXT:
https://deeds.utsc.utoronto.ca/charters/05610001

DOWNLOADABLE SCHOLARLY EDITION:
https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/994/1/THESIS_deposited_20_July_2010.pdf

The privilege is addressed to the Gilbertine order under the superior prior of Sempringham and
confirms an exceptionally long list of churches, houses, lands and possessions.

DIRECTLY RELEVANT WORDING IN THE POSSESSION LIST INCLUDES:

- the churches of St Margaret and All Saints at Suldham;
- "dominico manerio de Suldham cum pertinentiis suis";
- immediately thereafter named possessions/places including Kavenham, Cotel, Thorp, Wykehale,
Well, Len and Stok.

STATUS:
[Verified at scholarly digital charter-edition level.]
This is not an inspection of the original papal bull/parchment.

IMPORTANT INTERPRETIVE LIMIT:
The syntax must not be stretched beyond the edition.
The charter proves that the Gilbertine possession list recognised:
- the demesne manor of Suldham with its appurtenances; and
- Kavenham among the named possessions in the same relevant sequence.

It does NOT, from this wording alone, prove that Kavenham was itself an appurtenance of the
Suldham demesne manor, nor does it identify the locality covered by the separate Henry III
free-warren grant reported in 1275.

SIGNIFICANCE:
1. It independently confirms a demesne-manor layer at Suldham/Shouldham in the Gilbertine
possession structure by the mid-thirteenth century.
2. It independently confirms that Kavenham/Cavenham is a real medieval Gilbertine possession name
in the same documentary environment.
3. Therefore the earlier Cavenham free-warren warning is not merely a modern auction-catalogue
distraction: Cavenham genuinely belongs in the medieval source comparison.
4. The exact Henry III warren charter still has to be identified by locality before the later
Shouldham Warren can be assigned to the Priory manor.

[Inference]
Combined with the PASS 20 1212 Liber Feodorum entry, this strengthens the conclusion that the
Shouldham foundation/title history contains multiple legal layers. In 1212 Geoffrey fitz Peter is
still returned in the royal service framework; by 1247-1254 the Gilbertine confirmation expressly
includes the demesne manor of Suldham. The intervening legal mechanism must still be reconstructed
rather than assumed.

========================================================================
O. PRIORY FRANCHISE SEPARATION — 1248 STOKE FERRY MARKET / FAIR
========================================================================

The VCH Shouldham Priory account has been re-read in the light of the Cavenham problem.

VCH SOURCE:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/PageVCH_Norfolk_2.djvu/452

It records that in 1248 Henry III granted the PRIORY:
- a weekly Friday market at STOKE FERRY; and
- an annual fair there around the feast of St Nicholas.

VCH cites:
Charter Roll, 32 Henry III, membrane 6.

STATUS:
[Verified at VCH / cited Charter-Roll level; underlying membrane not inspected in this pass.]

RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:
This is important principally as an exclusion/control example.
It demonstrates that a franchise held by "the Prior of Shouldham" can be geographically attached
to another place in the Priory estate — here Stoke Ferry.

Therefore the 1275 statement that the Prior of Shouldham had a Henry III free-warren grant still
cannot be converted into:
"free warren in the manor of Shouldham"
without reading the actual charter/localities.

This materially reinforces the project's refusal to equate institutional name with franchise
location.

========================================================================
P. 1611 -> 1612 — RUSSELLS: OFFICIAL DEED + REPORTED FIRST COURT
========================================================================

The two sources already present in the cumulative research now combine in a way not previously
exploited.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
26 NOVEMBER 1611 — OFFICIAL ARCHIVE CATALOGUE
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NRO HARE 3083/2, 201 x 6
Indenture of Bargain & Sale

PARTIES:
1. Sir Robert Riche of Wallington, knight, and Dame Fraunces his wife
2. William Battes of Shouldham Thorpe, gent.

PROPERTY:
- manor of Shouldham Thorpe alias Garboysthorpe;
- Foston;
- Russells;
- associated messuages, lands and tenements in Shouldham Thorpe, Foston and Stradsett.

OFFICIAL CATALOGUE:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/4a8a576e-85b9-42a6-8ea7-b99900bbbd93

STATUS:
[Verified official NRO/TNA catalogue description.]
Full deed image/transcription still not inspected.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1612 — ANTIQUARIAN COURT-ROLL REPORT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The 1867 Notes & Queries correspondent, working from a private collection of Shouldham-area deeds
and court rolls, records of the youngest William in the printed Butts pedigree:

- under age in 1585;
- held his FIRST COURT for the MANOR OF RUSSELL in GARBESTHORP in 1612;
- will dated 1623;
- brother Henry executor.

DOWNLOADABLE SOURCE ALREADY IN LEDGER:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/49/Notes_and_queries_IA_notesqueries03unse_0.pdf

STATUS:
[Verified as a digitised nineteenth-century antiquarian report.]
The underlying 1612 court roll has NOT been located.

[Inference]
The near-immediate sequence is now highly significant:

26 Nov 1611
RICH + FRANCES -> WILLIAM BATTES OF SHOULDHAM THORPE
includes RUSSELLS
|
v
1612
WILLIAM BUTTS holds FIRST COURT for RUSSELL in GARBESTHORP

The name, place, manor and timing align unusually closely.
This is strong circumstantial evidence that the William Battes in HARE 3083/2 is the William Butts
reported as holding the Russell court in 1612.

It is still labelled INFERENCE until the deed, 1612 court roll, will or another primary record
expressly ties the identities together.

========================================================================
Q. 1619 VISITATION — WILLIAM AND LEONARD BUTTS ARE BROTHERS IN THE PRINTED
HERALDIC PEDIGREE
========================================================================

A direct online edition of the 1619 Kent Visitation has now been located.

PRINTED EDITION:
The Visitation of Kent, taken in the years 1619-1621 by John Philipot.

DIRECT PDF:
https://kent-opc.org/Parishes/Misc/VisitationKent1619.pdf

Relevant printed page:
116.

The pedigree there places:
- William Butts, identified as the first/eldest son;
- Leonard Butts, then surviving at Bromley;
- their siblings in the same generation.

It gives Leonard's wife as Jane/Jana, daughter and heir of Richard Leonard of Suffolk, with later
editorial material identifying her as widow of John Law of London.

OFFICIAL MANUSCRIPT SOURCE-FINDERS:
British Library Add MS 23750 — Herald's Visitation of Kent, 1619:
https://searcharchives.bl.uk/catalog/032-002097397

British Library Stowe MS 618 — Visitation of Kent, 1619, copy:
https://searcharchives.bl.uk/catalog/040-001953445

STATUS:
[Verified in a published visitation edition and official BL catalogue descriptions.]
The exact original pedigree page in Add MS 23750 / Stowe MS 618 has not been inspected directly.

IMPORTANT:
The visitation does NOT by itself say that Leonard succeeded to every Norfolk manor of William.
It does, however, independently establish the brother relationship required to test the 1611 ->
1628 title movement.

========================================================================
R. 1628 — LEONARD BUTTES -> SIR JOHN HARE: SAME CORE CLUSTER + GAWSELLS
========================================================================

11 APRIL 1628

NRO HARE 3085, 201 x 6
Indenture — Deed to Lead the Uses of a Recovery

PARTIES INCLUDE:
1. Leonard Buttes of Bromley, Kent, esquire, and Johanna his wife
2. Sir John Hare of Stowe Bardolph, knight
3. Raphe Whitfeld and Clement Spelman

PROPERTY:
- Thorps / Shouldham Thorpe / Garboysthorpe;
- Foston / Fodeston;
- Russells;
- Gawsells;
- appurtenant property in Shouldham Thorpe, Foston and Stradsett.

OFFICIAL CATALOGUE:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/297d3b1d-dad8-42d6-b050-1bcf5e0e2de1

STATUS:
[Verified official NRO/TNA catalogue description.]
Full deed image/transcription still required.

STRUCTURAL RESULT:
1611 package:
- Shouldham Thorpe / Garboysthorpe
- Foston
- Russells

1628 package to Hare:
- Shouldham Thorpe / Garboysthorpe
- Foston
- Russells
- Gawsells

The 1628 instrument therefore contains the recognisable 1611 core cluster plus Gawsells.

========================================================================
S. PASS 21 TITLE MECHANISM — RICH -> WILLIAM BATTES/BUTTS -> LEONARD BUTTES ->
HARE
========================================================================

The evidence can now be separated into verified documentary anchors and inference.

VERIFIED ANCHORS:

1611 — HARE 3083/2
RICH + FRANCES
-> WILLIAM BATTES OF SHOULDHAM THORPE
-> Shouldham Thorpe / Foston / Russells

1612 — 1867 report from now-lost/unlocated court-roll collection
WILLIAM BUTTS
-> first court for RUSSELL in GARBESTHORP

1619 — published Kent Visitation
WILLIAM and LEONARD BUTTS
-> brothers in the same pedigree generation
-> Leonard living at Bromley

1628 — HARE 3085
LEONARD BUTTES OF BROMLEY + JOHANNA
-> SIR JOHN HARE
-> Shouldham Thorpe / Foston / Russells / Gawsells

[Inference]
Taken together, these sources now form a strong working title mechanism:

RICH / GAWDY-DERIVED DISPOSAL
|
| 1611 HARE 3083/2
v
WILLIAM BATTES / BUTTS
|
| 1612 Russell court activity
| family/title succession still needs primary bridge
v
LEONARD BUTTES OF BROMLEY
|
| 1628 HARE 3085 recovery assurance
v
SIR JOHN HARE

The remaining unproved step is the precise legal devolution from William to Leonard between the
1623 will period and the 1628 recovery.

DECISIVE DOCUMENTS FOR THAT STEP:
- William Butts's 1623 will/probate;
- underlying 1612 Russell court roll;
- any post-1623 admission, descent, settlement or conveyance;
- full HARE 3085 deed/uses of recovery;
- the original 1619 visitation manuscript/proofs if they contain added title information.

========================================================================
T. GAWSELLS DID NOT HAVE TO COME TO HARE THROUGH THE 1611 RICH SALE
========================================================================

This is an important correction to an overly simple "Gawdy/Rich estate -> Hare" narrative.

The 1611 Rich sale to William Battes names:
- Shouldham Thorpe;
- Foston;
- Russells.

It does NOT name Gawsells in the catalogue description.

But the 1867 court-roll report already records an older BUTTS / GAWSELL connection:
- William Butts held court jure uxoris for Gawsells Manor in Watlington in 34 Henry VIII;
- his wife Ursula is described as widow of Richard Gawsell;
- the following William held his first court for a manor in Garbesthorp, "late Gawsells," on
27 September 11 Elizabeth.

By 1628 HARE 3085 expressly includes Gawsells in Leonard Buttes's package to Sir John Hare.

[Inference]
A strong alternative mechanism therefore exists:

GAWSELL / URSULA
-> BUTTS FAMILY GAWSELLS STREAM

while separately:

RICH + FRANCES
-> 1611 sale of SHOULDHAM THORPE / FOSTON / RUSSELLS
-> WILLIAM BATTES/BUTTS

These components could then have been combined in the Buttes family before the 1628 assurance to
Hare.

This is more precise than assuming Gawsells was simply another manor sold by Rich in 1611.

CRITICAL COLTS CONSEQUENCE:
Neither HARE 3083/2 nor HARE 3085 names Watlington Colts / Trussbutts or Shouldham Priory manor in
the catalogue description.

Therefore these deeds illuminate the surrounding estate assembly but DO NOT prove the operative
1632 transfer of Colts or Priory manor.

========================================================================
U. 1632 "UNITED MANORS" — OFFICIAL HERITAGE SUMMARY REMAINS A LEAD, NOT THE
OPERATIVE DEED
========================================================================

Historic England states that:
- Colt's/Trussbutt's and Shouldham Priory manor had become united through the Gawdy/Rich line; and
- the united manors ultimately passed to Sir John Hare in 1632.

SOURCE:
https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry

The West Norfolk conservation-area account similarly says that in 1632 the Priory manor together
with Colts/Trusbutts was bought by Sir John Hare.

SOURCE:
https://www.west-norfolk.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/1928/shouldham_conservation_area_leaflet.pdf

PASS 21 CAUTION:
HARE 3085 proves Sir John Hare was already acquiring the Shouldham Thorpe/Foston/Russells/Gawsells
cluster in 1628.

Therefore 1632 should not be treated as the moment at which every neighbouring manor suddenly
became one legal estate.

The archive evidence points to INCREMENTAL ASSEMBLY.

PRIORITY NOW:
Locate the 1628-1632 instrument(s) which expressly name:
- Watlington Coltes / Trusbuttes;
- Colts;
- Shouldham Priory manor;
- or both together.

Until that is found, the exact legal mechanism by which Colts + Priory reached Hare remains
secondary-source title history, even though the 1633 Hare field book strongly confirms Hare estate
control immediately afterwards.

========================================================================
V. NEW GAWDY ARCHIVE ROUTES — PHILLIPPS MSS + BRITISH LIBRARY
========================================================================

PASS 21 located two useful higher-level Gawdy archive routes which should be searched for the
missing Gawdy/Rich title assurances and estate papers.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. NORFOLK RECORD OFFICE — PHILLIPPS MSS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Official collection description:
MANUSCRIPTS OF SIR THOMAS PHILLIPPS RELATING TO NORFOLK

URL:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/redirect/a2a/?Gsm=2008-06-18&cat=153-phi&cid=-1

The collection description explicitly identifies a major GAWDY OF WEST HARLING provenance group:
- Phi/300-1
- Phi/475-6
- Phi/583
- Phi/589
- Phi/613/2
- Phi/613/5

It explains that some material passed through Norfolk antiquaries including Peter Le Neve,
Francis Blomefield, Thomas Martin and Sir John Fenn.

STATUS:
[Verified official archive collection description.]
No item in the Gawdy group has yet been shown to concern Shouldham/Colts.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2. BRITISH LIBRARY — ADD MS 36990
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICIAL CATALOGUE:
https://searcharchives.bl.uk/catalog/032-002055509

TITLE / SCOPE:
Gawdy family of West Harling, Norfolk — correspondence and papers, 1540-1703.

The catalogue includes household/farm accounts and family papers over the relevant period.

STATUS:
[Verified official BL catalogue lead.]
No Watlington-Colts item has yet been identified inside the volume.

WHY THESE ROUTES MATTER:
The missing assurances may have survived outside the HARE deed sequence because Gawdy papers were
historically dispersed through antiquarian collections.

SEARCH TERMS FOR IMAGE/CATALOGUE ORDERS:
- Shouldham / Shuldham / Suldham
- Watlington / Watlyngton
- Coltes / Colts
- Trusbut / Trusbuttes
- Mildmay
- Thomas Shouldham / Shuldham
- Francis Gawdy
- Frances Rich / Riche
- Robert Rich / Riche
- Buttes / Battes
- manor / recovery / fine / bargain and sale / settlement

========================================================================
W. FREE-WARREN LOCALITY — PASS 21 RESULT
========================================================================

PASS 21 has NOT securely extracted the decisive localities from:
- Rotuli Hundredorum vol. I pp.458, 519, 532, 538;
- Placita de Quo Warranto p.489;
- the underlying Henry III charter.

Therefore the key statement remains:

PRIORY HAD A HENRY III FREE-WARREN GRANT = SUPPORTED BY VCH'S CITED PRIMARY-RECORD TRAIL.

FREE WARREN SPECIFICALLY AT SHOULDHAM = NOT YET PROVED.

CAVENHAM/KAVENHAM AS A REAL PRIORY/GILBERTINE POSSESSION = NOW STRONGLY DOCUMENTED BY THE
1247-1254 PAPAL CONFIRMATION.

[Inference]
The Cavenham competing hypothesis has therefore become stronger as a documentary possibility,
but not strong enough to assign the warren there either.

The correct next move is page/membrane extraction, not further generic web searching.

========================================================================
X. 1616 / 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN — PASS 21 NEGATIVE RESULT
========================================================================

No underlying primary record was recovered for the reported 1616 Warren reference.

No archive shelfmark, scan or full transcription was recovered for the 1634 Shouldham Warren
lease.

Therefore PASS 21 does NOT add:
- a lessor;
- lessee;
- manor name;
- exact Warren boundary;
- rent;
- sporting reservation;
- rabbit quota wording;
- entry right;
- successors/assigns clause.

The 1634 lease remains an official Norfolk Heritage source-lead only.

Because the Hare estate was already being assembled through multiple manor streams by the 1620s,
lessor identity by itself will not be enough. The lease must be tied to a manor/rental/accounting
stream or mapped parcels.

========================================================================
Y. ENCLOSURE + 1926-1930 SURVIVAL BOUNDARY — PASS 21 NEGATIVE RESULT
========================================================================

No public full copy was recovered in PASS 21 for:
- the 1749 Watlington, Norfolk inclosure award;
- its map;
- claims book;
- commissioners' papers;
- the complete 1794-1798 Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe award and map beyond already-recorded
derivative/schedule evidence;
- a Watlington-Colts-specific MAF 9 / 13 / 27 compensation or enfranchisement file.

This remains a genuine negative result, not evidence that the records never existed.

The current strategy remains:
1. identify exact Colts / former-copyhold parcels and tenant names;
2. then search MAF by person/parish/manor/parcel rather than broad "Watlington Colts" wording.

========================================================================
Z. PASS 21 — RIGHTS-SURVIVAL EFFECT
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 21 EFFECT
------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------

Lordship/title chain NEW STRUCTURAL CLARITY around neighbouring manor assembly.
1611 -> 1612 -> 1619 -> 1628 gives a strong Buttes mechanism
for Shouldham Thorpe/Foston/Russells/Gawsells.
It does NOT yet identify the 1632 Colts/Priory conveyance.

Court baron / customary court UPGRADED as a source trail for Gawsells/Russells.
Reported 1612 Russell court now aligns closely with the 1611
official deed. Underlying roll still missing.

Warren NO Colts upgrade.
Cavenham is now independently embedded in the medieval
Gilbertine possession record, strengthening the competing-origin
problem. Free-warren locality still unresolved.

Sporting NO Colts upgrade.
Wider Hare/Stow sporting stream remains real; provenance to Colts
remains unproved.

Fold / fold liberty NO change to current-survival result.
Historic Colts case remains strong; enclosure transformation
remains the dominant obstacle.

Commons / waste NO change.
Search substituted allotment/property rather than assume the old
common right survived unchanged.

Minerals / quarry / entry NO direct Colts reservation found.
Still highest-value legally survivable target.

Market / fair PRIORY FRANCHISE GEOGRAPHY becomes clearer:
1248 market/fair granted to Priory at Stoke Ferry demonstrates
institutional holder != franchise locality.
No Colts market title proved.

Piscary No new Colts evidence.

16s rent No later continuation recovered.

Gawsells rights STRONGLY SEPARATED from Colts for current-right purposes.
Buttes family court/title stream can now be followed into Hare by
1628; this is a neighbouring manor stream unless a later Colts
combination instrument says otherwise.

========================================================================
AA. PASS 21 — REVISED DECISIVE ORDER
========================================================================

1. 1628-1632 HARE ACQUISITION DEED(S) FOR COLTS + PRIORY
Search the HARE collection specifically for:
- Watlington Coltes / Colts / Trusbuttes;
- Shouldham Priory manor;
- Rich / Frances;
- Sir John Hare;
- 1628-1632.
This is now the cleanest way to replace the generic "ultimately in 1632" statement with an
operative legal instrument.

2. WILLIAM BUTTS 1623 WILL / PROBATE + 1612 RUSSELL COURT ROLL
Goal:
prove the William -> Leonard legal devolution and turn the current strong inference into a
documented title bridge.

3. FULL HARE 3083/2 + HARE 3085 IMAGES
Extract:
- covenants;
- uses;
- consideration;
- previous title recitals;
- schedules;
- rights/appurtenances;
- warrants;
- any reference to Gawsell succession or Rich title.

4. HENRY III FREE-WARREN PRIMARY TEXT
Extract the actual entries at:
- Hundred Rolls I pp.458, 519, 532, 538;
- Quo Warranto p.489;
- underlying charter/Charter Roll if identifiable.
Record every locality verbatim.

5. GAWDY DISPERSED PAPERS
Search:
- NRO Phi/300-1, 475-6, 583, 589, 613/2, 613/5;
- BL Add MS 36990;
for Shouldham/Watlington/Colts/Trusbutts/Rich/Buttes title material.

6. 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN LEASE
Recover the actual instrument; then map its parcels against:
- Abbey Farm;
- Warren;
- Colts Farm;
- HARE 2495;
- HARE 5466;
- enclosure map.

7. FULL HARE 5466 SCHEDULE PACKAGE
Compare Colts Farm, Abbey Farm, Warren, mineral/lime ground, tenants and reservations.

8. FULL SHOULDHAM / SHOULDHAM THORPE INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP
Resolve substitute allotments and manor/estate parcels.

9. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON AWARD + MAP
Work outward from MS 7245, 7B4 and parent provenance.

10. MAF 9 / 13 / 27
Search after exact copyholders/parcels are reconstructed.

11. ACTUAL 1943 HARE -> FORESTRY LEASE
Test sporting/mineral/timber/access reservations and parcel boundaries.

12. HMLR CURRENT/HISTORIC PARCEL TITLES
Only after candidate right + burdened parcel are identified.

========================================================================
AB. PASS 21 — NEW SOURCE / DOWNLOAD URLS
========================================================================

1. DEEDS Project — papal confirmation 1247-1254, charter 05610001:
https://deeds.utsc.utoronto.ca/charters/05610001

2. Downloadable scholarly cartulary edition containing the confirmation:
https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/994/1/THESIS_deposited_20_July_2010.pdf

3. 1619 Kent Visitation — downloadable PDF:
https://kent-opc.org/Parishes/Misc/VisitationKent1619.pdf

4. British Library Add MS 23750 — Herald's Visitation of Kent, 1619:
https://searcharchives.bl.uk/catalog/032-002097397

5. British Library Stowe MS 618 — Visitation of Kent, 1619 copy:
https://searcharchives.bl.uk/catalog/040-001953445

6. Norfolk Record Office Phillipps MSS — Gawdy of West Harling provenance group:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/redirect/a2a/?Gsm=2008-06-18&cat=153-phi&cid=-1

7. British Library Add MS 36990 — Gawdy family papers, 1540-1703:
https://searcharchives.bl.uk/catalog/032-002055509

NOTE:
HARE 3083/2, HARE 3085, Notes & Queries, VCH Shouldham and Historic England URLs were already in
the cumulative ledger and are therefore not duplicated as newly encountered URLs.

========================================================================
AC. PASS 21 — BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

No new present-day Watlington-Colts substantive right is proved in PASS 21.

The pass DOES materially improve the title/source architecture in three ways.

FIRST:
The 1247-1254 papal confirmation independently places the demesne manor of Suldham and Kavenham in
the relevant Gilbertine possession list. This makes the Priory/Cavenham warren-origin problem
substantive medieval source work rather than speculative modern genealogy.

SECOND:
The 1611 official Rich -> William Battes deed, the reported 1612 Russell court, the 1619 visitation
brother relationship, and the 1628 Leonard Buttes -> Sir John Hare recovery now combine into a
strong working mechanism for the neighbouring Shouldham Thorpe / Foston / Russells / Gawsells
cluster.

[Inference]
The William Battes of the 1611 deed is very likely the William Butts reported as holding his first
Russell court in 1612, and the later Leonard Buttes transfer to Hare is very likely part of the same
family/title stream. The missing William -> Leonard legal instrument must still be recovered.

THIRD:
This evidence makes the simple phrase "Gawdy/Rich united manors passed to Hare in 1632" too coarse
for rights reconstruction. Hare was already assembling distinct manor packages by 1628. The
actual 1628-1632 conveyance(s) naming COLTS/TRUSBUTTS and SHOULDHAM PRIORY are now the priority.

CURRENT SURVIVAL RESULT REMAINS:
- MINERALS / QUARRIES / WORKING RIGHTS: legally strong survivor class; no Colts title proved.
- SPORTING / WARREN: real wider-estate survival; Colts origin still unproved and competing
Priory/other origin remains serious.
- FOLD / COMMONS: historically strong Colts case; same-right survival remains weakened by
enclosure; seek substitute allotment/property.
- GAWSELLS COURT/RIGHTS: increasingly well documented as a separate Buttes/Hare stream; do not
import into Colts.
- MARKET / FAIR: Priory franchise geography demonstrates why manor/institution and locality must
be separated; no Colts franchise proved.
- PISCARY / 16s RENT / WORKS: no new survival bridge.

END PASS 21

========================================================================
AD. PASS 22 — DEEP CONTINUATION + STRICT DE-DUPLICATION RULE
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 22 continues from PASS 21 without deleting, replacing or silently upgrading any prior
finding, negative result, archive reference, URL or rights-survival assessment.

Because repeated discovery had become a serious efficiency problem, PASS 22 imposed a stricter
rule before any candidate finding could be counted as new:

1. exact-search the complete PASS 21 cumulative handover;
2. if the fact/reference/source is already there, DO NOT count it as new;
3. only retain a repeat when it adds materially new evidence such as:
- a previously unknown archive shelfmark;
- an original/near-primary record;
- a new party/date/place/parcel;
- a new operative clause;
- a new title bridge;
- a change to the survival assessment.

EXPLICITLY EXCLUDED AS PASS-22 "NEW" FINDINGS BECAUSE THEY WERE ALREADY IN PASS 21:
- Shouldham Fuel Allotment = 95 acres;
- Shouldham Thorpe Fuel Allotment = 60 acres;
- Charity Commission reference P.R. 29.(1) p.520;
- the Cavenham/Kavenham competing free-warren hypothesis;
- HARE 6956/1-5 c.1900 Hare/Hoff exchange maps;
- HARE 5466 catalogue-level Colts Farm / Abbey Farm separation;
- HARE 3083/2 (1611) and HARE 3085 (1628);
- 1247-1254 Suldham/Kavenham papal confirmation;
- 1634 Shouldham Warren lease existence/rabbit-delivery lead;
- modern wider Hare/Stow sporting-right evidence.

PASS 22 therefore concentrated on genuinely unresolved documentary edges.

========================================================================
AE. NEW — NRO HARE MS 2723: THE 1632 SHOULDHAM -> SIR JOHN HARE RELEASE
========================================================================

PASS-21 DE-DUPE CHECK:
Exact search for "HARE 2723" in the entire PASS 21 handover returned no match.
This is therefore a genuine new archival reference for this project.

ARCHIVE REFERENCE REPORTED IN SCHOLARSHIP:
Norfolk Record Office
HARE MS 2723

DATE:
1632

DOCUMENT TYPE / DESCRIPTION AS QUOTED IN SCHOLARSHIP:
A deed of release to Sir John Hare of the "manor and estate of Shouldham" in Norfolk.

PARTIES REPORTED AS RELEASING TO SIR JOHN HARE:
- Sir Thomas Barrington
- Sir William Marsham / Masham [spelling varies in the secondary citation]
- Sir Nathaniel Rich
- John Pym
- Peter Phesaunt

WITNESS REPORTED:
- Walter Jeffes

SCHOLARLY SOURCE ROUTE:
Misha Teramura, "Against Friendship: An Essay by the 'Wizard' Earl of Northumberland",
English Literary Renaissance 47 (2017), reporting Stephen Clucas's 2003 citation of the NRO deed.

OPEN FULL-TEXT ROUTE EXPOSING THE NOTE:
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/against-friendship-an-essay-by-the-wizard-earl-of-northumberland/259664545?nway-content_model=A

STATUS:
[Verified at scholarly-citation level to a specifically identified NRO manuscript.]
The actual HARE 2723 deed image/full NRO catalogue description has NOT been inspected.

CRITICAL LIMIT — DO NOT OVERSTATE:
The quoted scholarly description says:
"manor and estate of Shouldham".

It does NOT, in the wording presently recovered, expressly say:
- Watlington Coltes;
- Watlington Trusbuttes;
- Colt's manor;
- Shouldham Priory manor;
- both united manors;
- the Warren;
- folds;
- minerals;
- sporting rights;
- market/fair;
- rents.

Therefore HARE 2723 is NOT YET proof that the 1632 release carried both Colts/Trusbutts and the
Priory manor.

WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT:
PASS 21 ended with only modern heritage summaries stating that the united Colts/Priory manors
ultimately reached Sir John Hare in 1632.

HARE 2723 is the first concrete 1632 HARE shelfmark recovered in this project for a release of a
Shouldham manor/estate to Sir John Hare.

It therefore converts the 1632 problem from:
"find some unknown 1632 deed"
into:
"obtain HARE 2723 and test its recitals/property clauses against Colts + Priory."

DECISIVE EXTRACTION FROM HARE 2723:
- exact operative manor style;
- all aliases;
- all appurtenant parishes;
- recited earlier conveyances;
- why Barrington / Marsham / Rich / Pym / Phesaunt had title or authority;
- whether they acted as trustees, mortgagees, feoffees, executors or otherwise;
- consideration;
- rights and appurtenances;
- folds/foldcourse;
- court/perquisites;
- rents;
- warrens/game;
- minerals/pits;
- timber;
- commons/waste;
- advowsons;
- any schedule/map;
- seals/witnesses;
- linked deeds immediately before/after HARE 2723.

[Inference]
The combination of Sir Nathaniel Rich and other nationally prominent contemporaries among the
releasing parties makes it plausible that HARE 2723 is part of a settlement/trust/title mechanism
behind the Rich-derived estate rather than a simple occupier-to-occupier sale. The actual deed must
be read before assigning their legal capacity.

========================================================================
AF. NEW — WILLIAM BUTTS OF SHOULDHAM THORPE: EXACT PCC PROBATE TARGET
========================================================================

PASS-21 DE-DUPE CHECK:
PASS 21 knew only that the youngest William Butts:
- held his first Russell court in 1612;
- had a will dated 1623;
- named brother Henry as executor;
- required a probate search.

Exact PASS-21 searches found NO:
- "36 Hele";
- exact PCC piece for this William;
- 1626 probate entry identifying him by Garboysthorpe alias.

NEW PCC INDEX ENTRY:
1626
BUTTS, WILLIAM, gent.
of:
"Thorpe als. Shouldham Thorpe als. Garboysthorpe, co. Norfolk"
PCC citation:
"36 Hele"

SOURCE:
The Index Library — PCC wills index for 1620-1629.

DIRECT DOWNLOADABLE PDF:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/The_Index_library_IA_indexlibrary4461brit.pdf

PCC REGISTER MAPPING:
Independent PRO/PCC reference examples for the 1626 Hele register identify:
- Register: HELE
- quires 1-56
- TNA piece: PROB 11/148

OPEN REFERENCE ROUTE SHOWING THE REGISTER/PIECE MAPPING:
https://www.ww2.opcdorset.org/fordingtondorset/Files/FordingtonDorchesterCo2.html

SAFE ORDER TARGET:
The National Archives
Prerogative Court of Canterbury
PROB 11/148
Hele 36
William Butts, gent., of Thorpe alias Shouldham Thorpe alias Garboysthorpe
1626

STATUS:
[Verified at published PCC-index level for William's name/place and "36 Hele".]
[Verified through independent PCC metadata that Hele quires 1-56 are in PROB 11/148.]
The actual William Butts probate image/transcription has NOT yet been recovered.

WHY THIS IS A MAJOR ADVANCE:
PASS 21's largest break in the 1611 -> 1628 Buttes/Hare mechanism was:

WILLIAM BATTES/BUTTS
|
? legal devolution
v
LEONARD BUTTES

The probate is now no longer an unidentified target.
It is a precise archive order:

PROB 11/148 — HELE 36 — 1626.

THE WILL MUST BE EXTRACTED FOR:
- exact will date;
- probate date;
- wife / children / declaration of no issue;
- Leonard Butts;
- Henry Butts as executor;
- John Butts;
- Jane/Frances/sisters;
- Russell/Russells;
- Gawsells;
- Shouldham Thorpe/Garboysthorpe;
- Foston;
- Stradsett;
- Watlington;
- manor/court language;
- devises/remainders;
- sale directions;
- debts/mortgages;
- feoffees/trustees;
- whether real property passed to Leonard, Henry or was directed for sale.

THIS IS NOW ONE OF THE HIGHEST PRIORITY SINGLE DOCUMENTS IN THE PROJECT.

========================================================================
AG. NEW — LATEST WILLIAM BUTTS REPORTED DEAD WITHOUT ISSUE IN 1624
========================================================================

PASS-21 DE-DUPE CHECK:
Exact search for "1624" in PASS 21 returned no result for this William Butts chronology.

SOURCE:
Norman F. Ticehurst,
"The Swan-Marks of West Norfolk",
Transactions of the Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists' Society,
vol. XII, part 5 (1929), pp.581-630.

DIRECT PDF ROUTE:
https://norfolknaturalists.org.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Transactions-1928-29-transactionsofno12norf_page_717-960.pdf

RELEVANT SUBSTANCE:
Ticehurst traces two Gawsell-associated swan marks into the Buttes family and states, in substance,
that after descent through successive Williams the latest William died WITHOUT ISSUE in 1624.

STATUS:
[Verified at printed secondary/scholarly-local-history level.]
The underlying probate/court record upon which the 1624 statement depends has not yet been
identified in Ticehurst's footwork.

IMPORTANT CAUTION:
Ticehurst's printed genealogical wording is not infallible; elsewhere his spouse-name discussion is
not completely aligned with other pedigrees. Therefore:
- "died without issue in 1624" is a strong source lead;
- it should NOT replace the PCC probate itself.

CHAIN EFFECT:
This produces a much tighter chronology:

1612
William Butts first court for Russell
|
1623
will dated [reported by Notes & Queries]
|
1624
reported death without issue [Ticehurst]
|
1626
PCC probate — 36 Hele / PROB 11/148
|
1627
Leonard Butts demonstrably active as a Norfolk gentleman
|
1628
Leonard + Johanna -> Sir John Hare, HARE 3085
Shouldham Thorpe / Foston / Russells / Gawsells

[Inference]
If William truly died without issue, Leonard's position as his brother becomes a substantially more
plausible explanation for the appearance of the same property cluster in Leonard's 1628 assurance.
But the legal devolution remains unproved until PROB 11/148 and/or a descent/admission/settlement
record is read.

========================================================================
AH. NEW — ARCHIVAL ROUTE BEHIND TICEHURST: STOW BARDOLPH SWAN-ROLL MATERIAL
========================================================================

PASS-21 DE-DUPE CHECK:
PASS 21 contained no Ticehurst fonds, SAL/MS/819, TIC collection or Stow swan-roll archive route.

OFFICIAL REPOSITORY:
Society of Antiquaries of London — Collections Online

FONDS:
TIC — Collection of Norman F. Ticehurst on swan marks
Previous collection identity:
MS 819

OFFICIAL CATALOGUE:
https://collections.sal.org.uk/tic

The catalogue states that the archive is substantially more extensive than Ticehurst's published
work and includes original rolls, detailed notes and his facsimile drawings.

PARTICULARLY RELEVANT ITEM:
TIC/07 — Swan Marks, vol. IV
Previous reference:
SAL/MS/819/4-13

OFFICIAL CATALOGUE:
https://collections.sal.org.uk/tic.07

TIC/07 specifically catalogues the STOW SWAN-ROLL, which in 1924 was in the collection of
Sir Thomas Hare of Stow Hall, Stow Bardolph.

The catalogue dates the roll's compilation approximately:
1580-1602
with additions:
1604-1612.

This is an exceptionally relevant date range for the Gawsell/Buttes transition and reaches the year
in which the youngest William is reported to have held his first Russell court.

COLLECTED ARTICLE COPY:
TIC/18 — Collected Papers on Swan-History
includes:
Ticehurst, "The Swan-marks of West Norfolk", 1929, pp.581-630.

OFFICIAL CATALOGUE:
https://collections.sal.org.uk/tic.18

STATUS:
[Verified official archive catalogue route.]
The Stow roll itself has NOT been inspected in this pass.

WHY THIS MATTERS:
The printed 1929 article's statement about the Gawsell marks passing into the Buttes family and the
last William dying without issue is no longer a dead-end secondary citation.

There is now an identifiable Ticehurst research archive and a specifically catalogued Stow roll / notes
package which can be ordered and checked for:
- named Gawsell owners;
- named Buttes owners;
- dates of changes in marks;
- annotations of inheritance/sale;
- Russell/Garboysthorpe/Shouldham geographic notes;
- manuscript source references omitted from the printed article.

========================================================================
AI. NEW CONTROL POINT — LEONARD BUTTS IS ACTIVE AS "OF NORFOLK" IN 1627
========================================================================

PASS-21 DE-DUPE CHECK:
PASS 21 did not contain the 1627 restoration event.

A surviving/restored memorial tradition for Sir William Butts at Fulham records that Leonard Butts,
styled of Norfolk, restored the epitaph in 1627.

DNB / WIKISOURCE ROUTE:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dictionary_of_National_Biography_1885-1900/Butts_William

EARLIER PRINTED FULHAM DESCRIPTION:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ea/An_historical_and_topographical_account_of_Fulham_including_the_hamlet_of_Hammersmith_IA_historicaltopogr00faul.pdf

STATUS:
[Verified at printed biographical/monumental-source level.]

SIGNIFICANCE:
This is not a property instrument.
It is useful only as a chronological identity control:
- Leonard was alive;
- he was publicly styled as connected with Norfolk;
- this is one year before HARE 3085 styles him of Bromley, Kent, and conveys the Norfolk manor cluster.

The 1867 antiquarian writer also says Leonard "appears to have sold all his lands in Norfolk" and
gone to reside at Bromley.

That phrase is an antiquarian inference, NOT an operative deed recital.
HARE 3085 remains the primary legal anchor for the 1628 disposal.

========================================================================
AJ. PASS 22 — RECONSTRUCTED 1611-1632 ASSEMBLY SEQUENCE
========================================================================

The surrounding title architecture is now substantially sharper.

VERIFIED / SOURCE-ANCHORED EVENTS:

1611 — HARE 3083/2
Robert Rich + Frances
-> William Battes of Shouldham Thorpe
-> Shouldham Thorpe / Foston / Russells

1612 — reported underlying court roll
William Butts
-> first court for Russell in Garbesthorp

1619 — Kent Visitation
William + Leonard
-> brothers

1623 — antiquarian report
William's will dated
-> Henry brother executor

1624 — Ticehurst
latest William reported dying without issue

1626 — PCC index
William Butts, gent.
"Thorpe als. Shouldham Thorpe als. Garboysthorpe"
-> PCC 36 Hele
-> PROB 11/148

1627 — memorial control
Leonard Butts of Norfolk active

1628 — HARE 3085
Leonard Buttes + Johanna
-> Sir John Hare
-> Shouldham Thorpe / Foston / Russells / Gawsells

1632 — HARE 2723
Barrington / Marsham / Nathaniel Rich / Pym / Phesaunt
-> Sir John Hare
-> "manor and estate of Shouldham"

1633 — HARE 2495
Hare-era field book separately documents Colt's/Trussbutt's physical estate.

STRUCTURAL RESULT:
There is now direct documentary architecture on BOTH sides of the previously vague 1632 statement:

1628 HARE acquisition of one distinct manor cluster
|
1632 HARE 2723 release of a Shouldham manor/estate
|
1633 field book recording Colts as a separately identifiable physical estate

This is far stronger than simply repeating:
"the united manors passed to Hare in 1632."

CRITICAL UNRESOLVED QUESTION:
Does HARE 2723 itself name/recite:
- COLTS/TRUSBUTTS;
- PRIORY;
- both;
- or another Shouldham estate/manor?

Until that is answered, PASS 22 does NOT promote HARE 2723 to a proved Colts conveyance.

========================================================================
AK. PASS 22 — RIGHTS-SURVIVAL EFFECT
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 22 EFFECT
------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------

Lordship/title chain MATERIAL SOURCE ADVANCE.
HARE 2723 is now an exact 1632 archive target for a release
of the manor/estate of Shouldham to Sir John Hare.
Colts/Priory identity within the deed is still unproved.

Gawsells / Russell title MATERIAL CHAIN ADVANCE.
William's exact PCC probate is now PROB 11/148, Hele 36.
Reported death without issue in 1624 narrows the William ->
Leonard succession question materially.
This remains a neighbouring stream, not a Colts right.

Court baron / custom No new Colts court text.
1612 Russell activity remains separate Gawsells/Russells
evidence.

Warren NO COLTS UPGRADE.
PASS 22 did not recover the 1634 lease or prove pre-1632 manor
origin.

Sporting NO COLTS UPGRADE.
Wider modern Hare/Stow stream unchanged.

Fold / free fold NO CURRENT-SURVIVAL UPGRADE.
Historic Colts case unchanged; enclosure remains controlling.

Commons / waste NO CURRENT-SURVIVAL UPGRADE.
Existing 95A/60A fuel allotment material was correctly treated
as already-known and not repeated as a Pass-22 discovery.

Minerals / quarry / entry NO direct Colts reservation recovered.
Remain highest-value legally survivable target.

Market / fair No new Colts franchise title.

Piscary No new Colts title.

16s rent No continuation beyond previously recorded evidence.

========================================================================
AL. PASS 22 — NEGATIVE RESULTS / DO NOT CLAIM
========================================================================

PASS 22 did NOT recover:

1. the actual image/full transcription of HARE 2723;
2. proof from HARE 2723 that "manor and estate of Shouldham" expressly means
Watlington Colts/Trusbutts;
3. proof that HARE 2723 expressly includes Shouldham Priory manor;
4. the full text/image of William Butts's PROB 11/148, Hele 36 will;
5. a primary clause naming Leonard as William's heir/devisee;
6. the underlying 1612 Russell court roll;
7. the underlying manuscript source proving the precise 1624 death date;
8. the 1634 Shouldham Warren lease shelfmark/full text;
9. the full 1749 Watlington inclosure award/map/claims;
10. full HARE 5466 schedules;
11. a Colts-specific MAF 9/13/27 enfranchisement/compensation file;
12. a direct Colts mineral/sporting/warren reservation.

These remain unresolved, NOT disproved.

========================================================================
AM. PASS 22 — REVISED DECISIVE ORDER
========================================================================

1. NRO HARE 2723 — FULL DEED
Highest immediate title priority.
Determine the exact manor(s), recitals, rights and legal capacity of the releasing parties.

2. TNA PROB 11/148 — HELE 36 — WILLIAM BUTTS, 1626
Extract the entire will/probate.
This may close the William -> Leonard property bridge before HARE 3085.

3. NRO HARE 3085 — FULL 1628 DEED
Catalogue proves the property cluster; full deed may recite William's prior title and the
settlement/recovery mechanism.

4. TICEHURST / SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES TIC/07 + RELATED NOTES
Trace the Stow swan-roll entries behind the Gawsell -> Buttes succession statements.

5. ADJACENT HARE RECORDS AROUND HARE 2723
Search for prior conveyance, mortgage, settlement, release, fine/recovery and post-release
assurance in 1628-1633.

6. HARE 2495 — FULL 1633 COLTS FIELD BOOK
Compare the estate immediately after HARE 2723 with the deed's parcels and appurtenances.

7. 1634 SHOULDHAM WARREN LEASE
Only useful once its manor/accounting stream and parcels are identified.

8. HARE 5466 FULL SCHEDULE PACKAGE
Colts Farm vs Abbey Farm vs Warren vs mineral/lime ground.

9. FULL SHOULDHAM / SHOULDHAM THORPE INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP
Identify substitute allotments and pre-enclosure estate/manor ownership.

10. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON NORFOLK INCLOSURE AWARD + MAP
Work from NRO MS 7245, 7B4 and parent provenance rather than generic web title searches.

11. MAF 9 / 13 / 27
Search only after exact former Colts parcels/copyholders have been reconstructed.

12. ACTUAL 1943 HARE -> FORESTRY LEASE
Test parcel map + sporting/mineral/timber/access reservations.

========================================================================
AN. PASS 22 — NEW SOURCE / DOWNLOAD URLS
========================================================================

1. HARE 2723 scholarly citation / full-text source route:
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/against-friendship-an-essay-by-the-wizard-earl-of-northumberland/259664545?nway-content_model=A

2. PCC 1620-1629 Index Library — William Butts "36 Hele":
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/ff/The_Index_library_IA_indexlibrary4461brit.pdf

3. PCC Hele / PROB 11/148 register mapping source-finder:
https://www.ww2.opcdorset.org/fordingtondorset/Files/FordingtonDorchesterCo2.html

4. Ticehurst — Swan-Marks of West Norfolk PDF:
https://norfolknaturalists.org.uk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Transactions-1928-29-transactionsofno12norf_page_717-960.pdf

5. Society of Antiquaries — Ticehurst fonds:
https://collections.sal.org.uk/tic

6. Society of Antiquaries — TIC/07 Stow Swan-roll notes/facsimiles:
https://collections.sal.org.uk/tic.07

7. Society of Antiquaries — TIC/18 collected papers including West Norfolk article:
https://collections.sal.org.uk/tic.18

8. DNB / Leonard Butts 1627 memorial control:
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Dictionary_of_National_Biography_1885-1900/Butts_William

9. Fulham printed monument source:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ea/An_historical_and_topographical_account_of_Fulham_including_the_hamlet_of_Hammersmith_IA_historicaltopogr00faul.pdf

NOTE:
The existing Notes & Queries, HARE 3083/2, HARE 3085, Historic England, White 1845, Cavenham and
fuel-allotment URLs were NOT appended again merely because they were revisited.

========================================================================
AO. PASS 22 — BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

PASS 22 does NOT prove a new presently exercisable Watlington-Colts substantive right.

It DOES materially improve the documentary title architecture without recycling earlier discoveries.

THE TWO MOST IMPORTANT NEW ARCHIVAL TARGETS ARE NOW:

1. HARE MS 2723 — 1632
release of the "manor and estate of Shouldham" to Sir John Hare.

2. PROB 11/148, HELE 36 — 1626
William Butts of Thorpe alias Shouldham Thorpe alias Garboysthorpe.

Together with HARE 3085 (1628) and HARE 2495 (1633), these create a much tighter sequence around
the exact period in which the Hare estate was assembled.

[Inference]
The William Butts -> Leonard Buttes succession is now significantly more likely to be documentable:
William is reported to die without issue, his exact PCC probate is identified, Leonard is his proven
brother and appears with the related manor cluster in HARE 3085 four years after the reported death.
The missing proof is now concentrated in a small, named record set rather than an open-ended search.

CURRENT RIGHTS RESULT REMAINS DISCIPLINED:
- minerals/quarries/working rights: legally strong survivor class, no Colts-specific title yet;
- sporting/warren: real wider-estate survival, Colts origin unproved;
- fold/common: historic Colts case strong, same-right survival weakened by enclosure;
- Gawsells/Russells: increasingly traceable Buttes/Hare stream but still separate from Colts;
- HARE 2723: potentially decisive title bridge, but its exact manor identity/rights bundle must be read.

END PASS 22

========================================================================
AP. PASS 23 — FAST STRICT-DEDUPE RIGHTS/PARCEL ROUND
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 23 continues directly from PASS 22.

RULE ENFORCED:
Every candidate was checked against PASS 22 before being treated as new.
Previously known material was not counted again merely because another search exposed it.

PASS 23 deliberately stopped re-running:
- generic HARE 6956 searches;
- generic Fuel Allotment searches;
- generic Cavenham/free-warren searches;
- already-recorded HARE 5466 catalogue material;
- already-recorded 1943 sporting-reservation summary;
- generic 1749 Act searches which do not expose the Norfolk award.

The pass concentrated on additional evidence that can improve:
- parcel identification;
- enclosure geography;
- late estate/resource chronology;
- exclusion of neighbouring rights from Colts.

========================================================================
AQ. HARE 2723 — EXACT SCHOLARLY WORDING STRENGTHENS THE EXISTING PASS 22 LEAD
========================================================================

THIS IS A SOURCE-STRENGTHENING RESULT, NOT A NEW SHELFMARK.

PASS 22 already identified:
NRO HARE MS 2723
1632
release to Sir John Hare of the "manor and estate of Shouldham".

PASS 23 recovered the fuller scholarly note wording, which identifies:
- Sir Thomas Barrington;
- Sir William Marsham;
- Sir Nathaniel Rich;
- John Pym;
- Peter Phesaunt;
as parties releasing the manor and estate of Shouldham to:
- Sir John Hare;
with:
- Walter Jeffes
as a signatory witness.

OPEN SOURCE ROUTE:
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/against-friendship-an-essay-by-the-wizard-earl-of-northumberland/259664545?nway-content_model=A

STATUS:
[Verified at scholarly-note level to the specifically identified NRO manuscript.]
The actual HARE 2723 deed has still NOT been inspected.

NO UPGRADE TO COLTS:
The phrase remains "manor and estate of Shouldham".
It still does NOT by itself prove that the release expressly named:
- Watlington Colts;
- Watlington Trusbutts;
- Shouldham Priory manor;
- mines/minerals;
- sporting;
- Warren;
- fold;
- commons;
- rents;
or other rights.

DECISIVE ACTION REMAINS:
OBTAIN HARE 2723 ITSELF.

========================================================================
AR. 1796 SHOULDHAM / SHOULDHAM THORPE ENCLOSURE — NEW ROAD AND PARCEL DETAIL
========================================================================

The previously used Stoke Ferry & District History Group transcription of the
15 October 1796 enclosure notice contains additional detail which was NOT
recorded in PASS 22.

SOURCE:
https://stokeferrydhg.org/1750-1799-a-chronicle-of-events-in-the-village-of-stoke-ferry-norfolk/

SOURCE LEVEL:
Local historical transcription reproducing contemporary newspaper notices.
The original Norfolk Chronicle issue remains preferable.

NEW PASS-23 DETAILS:

1. ROGERS CORNER
-----------------
The seventh road, in SHOULDHAM THORPE, is described as crossing:
- Finchley Common;
- a gate near the Tithe Barn;
- Thorpe Green;
and then:
- lands belonging to Thomas Hare and others called ROGERS CORNER,
before joining the sixth road.

PASS-22 DE-DUPE:
"Rogers Corner" was not present in PASS 22.

2. DIRECT SHOULDHAM -> WATLINGTON ROAD
---------------------------------------
The tenth road in Shouldham Thorpe is described as:
- branching from the Stoke Ferry -> King's Lynn turnpike road;
- proceeding north-west;
- reaching the bounds of Tottenhill;
and explicitly being:
THE ROAD LEADING FROM SHOULDHAM TO WATLINGTON.

RIGHTS / PARCEL VALUE:
This provides an enclosure-date spatial connector between the Shouldham/Thorpe
estate geography and Watlington.

It does NOT prove that land along the road belonged to Colts.
It is a mapping/control feature for matching:
- HARE deeds;
- HARE 2495;
- HARE 6832;
- tithe parcels;
- enclosure allotments;
- later estate plans.

3. FEDDERSTON GREEN
-------------------
The eleventh road:
- branches from the turnpike road;
- does so at/near the Shepherd's House belonging to Thomas Hare;
- the house was occupied by James Parker;
- runs west over FEDDERSTON GREEN;
- continues to the bounds of Runcton Holme.

PASS-22 DE-DUPE:
"Fedderston Green" was not present in PASS 22.

4. GALOW LANE / WOODFIELD
--------------------------
The twelfth road:
- begins at the south end of the second road;
- runs west along GALOW LANE;
- continues over WOODFIELD.

The notice expressly divides portions of this road between:
- Shouldham;
- Fincham;
- Shouldham Thorpe.

PASS-22 DE-DUPE:
"Galow Lane" was not present in PASS 22.

SIGNIFICANCE:
These names materially improve the control network for reconstructing parcel
boundaries and determining which named estate/manor stream a later right belonged to.

CURRENT-RIGHT CONSEQUENCE:
NO present Colts road/access right is proved.
These are boundary / parcel-linking tools only until the award/map and title deeds
allocate proprietary benefits or liabilities.

========================================================================
AS. 1943 FORESTRY COMMISSION — OFFICIAL SHOULDHAM FOREST CHRONOLOGY
========================================================================

A Forestry Commission annual report for the year ending 30 September 1943
contains an official list of Commission forest units.

It lists:

140. SHOULDHAM, NORFOLK.

OFFICIAL DOWNLOADABLE PDF:
https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/1942/12/fcar_1943.pdf

STATUS:
[Verified in official Forestry Commission annual-report material.]

WHAT THIS ADDS:
It independently anchors Shouldham as an operational Forestry Commission forest
unit in the 1943 reporting year.

WHAT IT DOES NOT ADD:
It does NOT contain, in the identified entry:
- the Hare lessor;
- the 999-year lease wording;
- sporting reservation wording;
- mineral reservation wording;
- precise lease parcels;
- Colts Farm;
- Abbey Farm;
- Warren boundaries.

Therefore this is a chronology/source-strengthening result.
The ACTUAL 1943 LEASE remains decisive.

========================================================================
AT. 1996 SHOULDHAM THORPE — SANDRINGHAM GREENSANDS WATER ABSTRACTION
========================================================================

THE LONDON GAZETTE
2 December 1996

Hoff Bros. Limited
Church Farm
Shouldham Thorpe
King's Lynn
Norfolk

applied to the Environment Agency to abstract water from:

SANDRINGHAM GREENSANDS

at National Grid References:
- TF663081
- TF667086

at SHOULDHAM THORPE.

The proposal included:
- abstraction up to 90.9 cubic metres per hour;
- 2,181.8 cubic metres per day;
- 90,909 cubic metres between 1 March and 31 October annually;
- transfer into two existing reservoirs;
- re-abstraction for spray irrigation.

The notice says the application renewed existing licence:
6/33/56/149
while varying irrigated land and increasing annual quantity.

DIRECT OFFICIAL PDF:
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/54595/page/15941/data.pdf

STATUS:
[Verified official public notice.]

RIGHTS SIGNIFICANCE:
This is useful MODERN SUBSURFACE-RESOURCE / LAND-USE evidence in the exact wider
Shouldham Thorpe landscape.

CRITICAL EXCLUSION:
It is evidence concerning Hoff Bros / Church Farm / Shouldham Thorpe.
It is NOT evidence that:
- Watlington Colts owned groundwater;
- Watlington Colts owned minerals;
- a manorial mineral reservation existed;
- the lordship has present abstraction rights;
- the two grid-reference parcels were Colts land.

[Inference]
Its principal project value is negative/control evidence:
modern exploitable subsurface resources are demonstrably parcel-specific, reinforcing
the need to identify the burdened/benefited Colts parcels rather than infer a manor-wide
right from geology found elsewhere in Shouldham.

========================================================================
AU. 1749 WATLINGTON, NORFOLK INCLOSURE — DEEP PUBLIC SEARCH REMAINS NEGATIVE
========================================================================

PASS 23 again distinguished WATLINGTON, NORFOLK from the much more heavily indexed
Watlington, Oxfordshire material.

CONFIRMED EXISTING POSITION:
The Norfolk Act remains:
22 Geo. II, private c.37
Royal Assent: 26 May 1749
for inclosing/dividing commons and wastes within the manor/parish of Watlington,
Norfolk.

NO NEW FULL NORFOLK AWARD WAS RECOVERED.

PASS 23 did NOT recover:
- full award;
- award map;
- claims;
- commissioners' book;
- complete lord's allotment;
- mineral reservation;
- exact treatment of the Colts fold;
- substitute Colts allotment.

IMPORTANT:
Oxfordshire "Watlington Inclosure Award" search results are rejected and must not be
imported into the Norfolk project.

CURRENT ACTION:
The next search should remain provenance-led from:
- NRO MS 7245, 7B4;
- its parent fonds;
- parish/title/charity copies;
- Hare/Plestow/Coote estate papers;
not generic web title-searching.

========================================================================
AV. PASS 23 — RIGHTS-SURVIVAL EFFECT
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 23 EFFECT
------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------

Lordship / title NO legal-status change.
HARE 2723 source wording strengthened.
Actual deed still required before assigning Colts/Priory identity.

Roads / ways / access NEW parcel-control evidence:
Rogers Corner;
direct Shouldham -> Watlington enclosure road;
Fedderston Green;
Galow Lane / Woodfield.
No proprietary Colts access right yet proved.

Commons / fold NO survival upgrade.
Full awards remain decisive for substitute allotments.

Minerals / subsurface NEW modern parcel-specific resource-use control:
Hoff Bros abstraction from Sandringham Greensands at
TF663081 + TF667086.
This is Shouldham Thorpe/Hoff evidence, NOT Colts title.

Sporting / Warren 1943 official Forestry chronology strengthened.
No new Colts origin or present sporting ownership proof.

1943 lease Still missing.
Official 1943 Forest Unit listing is not a substitute for it.

1749 enclosure No new full award/map.
Remains the key Colts fold/common transformation record.

CURRENT PRESENT-RIGHTS RESULT:
NO new currently exercisable Watlington-Colts/Trusbutts substantive right is proved
by PASS 23.

========================================================================
AW. PASS 23 — STOP WASTING TIME: NEXT FIVE DOCUMENTS ONLY
========================================================================

1. NRO HARE 2723 — ACTUAL 1632 DEED
Extract every alias, recital, manor, parcel and right.

2. TNA PROB 11/148 — HELE 36 — WILLIAM BUTTS, 1626
Read full will/probate for heir/devisee/property wording.

3. NRO HARE 3085 — FULL 1628 RECOVERY DEED
Test whether it recites William's title / descent into Leonard.

4. NRO HARE 2495 — FULL 1633 COLTS FIELD BOOK
Compare the separately identifiable Colts estate immediately after HARE 2723.

5. FULL 1749 WATLINGTON, NORFOLK AWARD + MAP
Determine:
- Colts/lord allotment;
- fold;
- commons/waste;
- roads;
- drains;
- pits/minerals;
- reservations.

SECONDARY AFTER THOSE:
- HARE 5466 full schedules;
- 1794-98 Shouldham award/map;
- HARE 6374/6375 + HARE 6956 exchange package;
- MAF 9/13/27 after exact copyholders/parcels are reconstructed;
- actual 1943 Hare -> Forestry lease.

========================================================================
AX. PASS 23 — NEW SOURCE URLS
========================================================================

NEW TO CUMULATIVE URL LEDGER:

1. Forestry Commission annual report / official Shouldham Forest chronology:
https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/1942/12/fcar_1943.pdf

2. London Gazette — 1996 Hoff Bros Sandringham Greensands abstraction:
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/54595/page/15941/data.pdf

NOT ADDED AS NEW:
- Stoke Ferry 1795/1796 enclosure page — already in cumulative ledger;
- HARE 2723 source route — already added in PASS 22;
- Forestry England current/2016 plan — already in cumulative ledger.

========================================================================
AY. PASS 23 — BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

PASS 23 did NOT discover a new present Watlington-West substantive right.

It did improve the project in three useful ways:

1. ENCLOSURE GEOGRAPHY:
Additional 1796 place/road controls now include:
Rogers Corner;
Fedderston Green;
Galow Lane;
and an expressly described Shouldham -> Watlington road.

2. 1943 CHRONOLOGY:
Official Forestry Commission material independently lists Shouldham as forest unit 140
in the 1943 reporting year.

3. PARCEL-SPECIFIC SUBSURFACE CONTROL:
The 1996 Hoff abstraction notice proves substantial modern use of Sandringham Greensands
at two exact Shouldham Thorpe grid references.
It strengthens the rule that local geology/resource exploitation is not evidence of
Colts ownership without parcel/title linkage.

THE RESEARCH BOTTLENECK IS NOW DOCUMENT ACCESS, NOT ANOTHER ROUND OF GENERIC SEARCHES.

END PASS 23

========================================================================
AZ. PASS 24 — FIVE-DOCUMENT / STRICT-DEDUPE ROUND
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 24 continues directly from PASS 23.

MANDATORY DE-DUPE RULE:
No item is counted as new unless it was exact-checked against the complete
PASS 23 handover and adds a genuinely new shelfmark, party, date, parcel,
clause, source route, or changed rights assessment.

THIS PASS DID NOT RECOUNT:
- HARE 2723 itself;
- PROB 11/148 Hele 36 itself;
- HARE 3085 itself;
- HARE 2495 itself;
- HARE 5466 itself;
- HARE 6956 / HARE 6374 / HARE 6375;
- 95a / 60a fuel allotments;
- Cavenham free-warren hypothesis;
- existing 1943 sporting-right reservation evidence;
- generic 1749 Watlington Act references.

The five principal targets remained:
1. HARE 2723 actual deed;
2. PROB 11/148 Hele 36;
3. HARE 3085 full deed;
4. HARE 2495 full field book;
5. 1749 Watlington Norfolk award/map.

No public full image/transcription of those five decisive documents was recovered.
However, the pass produced several material archive/source advances around them.

========================================================================
BA. HARE 5466 — MAJOR CATALOGUE UPGRADE: ACTUAL TENANCY AGREEMENT + DATE + TENANT
========================================================================

HARE 5466 was already known and is NOT counted as a new shelfmark.

PASS 24 exact-checked the following against PASS 23:
- "James Pollard" = no prior match;
- "windmill in Shouldham Thorpe" = no prior match;
- "3rd Oct 1871" = no prior match;
- "Schedules: Tenancy agreement" = no prior match.

OFFICIAL NATIONAL ARCHIVES / NRO CATALOGUE:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/81c466ba-2759-40d3-b601-12e9249d85f6

REFERENCE:
Hare 5466, 222 x 5.

FULL CATALOGUE TITLE:
Schedules: Tenancy agreement, Sir Thomas Hare with James Pollard miller of
Wisbech St. Peter re windmill in Shouldham Thorpe, Papers enclosed.

DATE FIELD:
19th century; 3 October 1871.

THE SAME DESCRIPTION ENUMERATES, WITHIN THE PACKAGE:
- Fincham Hall Farm;
- Lower and Upper Wimbotsham Farms;
- Church Farm in Stow and Wimbotsham;
- COLTS FARM IN SHOULDHAM;
- SHOULDHAM ABBEY FARM;
- Home Farm in Stow Bardolph and Wallington;
- Heath Farm in Shouldham and Shouldham Thorpe;
- Marham Hall Farm;
- Chisewicks Farm and Park Lands in Shouldham Thorpe;
- New Bridge Farm;
- Park Farm;
- Thorpe Manor Farm;
- other Stow estate units.

STATUS:
[Verified official archive-catalogue metadata.]

WHY THIS CHANGES THE TARGET:
HARE 5466 is not merely an anonymous farm schedule.
It contains:
- an actual tenancy agreement;
- a named landlord;
- a named tenant;
- an identified economic unit (windmill);
- papers enclosed;
while its package simultaneously enumerates Colts Farm and Abbey Farm as
separate estate units.

RIGHTS VALUE:
The full bundle now needs to be inspected for standard landlord reservations and
exceptions, especially:
- game / sporting;
- timber;
- minerals / clay / sand / gravel;
- access;
- water;
- repair / drainage;
- mill rights;
- subletting;
- field boundaries;
- schedules;
- previous tenancy or title recitals.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
The catalogue does NOT say the 1871 windmill was part of Colts Farm.
Do not import mill rights into Colts.

========================================================================
BB. 1867 SHOULDHAM WINDMILL SALE -> 1871 HARE TENANCY: NEW PARCEL/ACQUISITION CLUE
========================================================================

A Norfolk mills source reproduces an 1867 auction notice.

SOURCE:
https://norfolkmills.co.uk/Windmills/tilney-st-lawrence-towermill.html

The sale was of property in SHOULDHAM, Lot 1, including:
- messuage / dwelling house;
- barn;
- stables;
- outbuildings;
- cottage;
- brick tower windmill;
- approximately 43 acres arable/pasture;
then occupied by:
JAMES POLLARD.

The description says the property abutted:
- north: public road from Shouldham to Marham;
- east: lands of Sir Thomas Hare;
- west: lands of J. B. Basham and others.

PASS-24 STRUCTURAL COMPARISON:

1867:
James Pollard occupies the Shouldham mill/43a holding;
Sir Thomas Hare owns adjoining land.

1871:
HARE 5466 catalogue title records:
Sir Thomas Hare -> James Pollard
tenancy agreement concerning a windmill in Shouldham Thorpe.

[Inference]
This raises a concrete possibility that the Hare estate acquired or reorganised a
Pollard mill holding between 1867 and 1871, or that the two references concern
closely related but not identical mill property.

THIS IS NOT PROVED:
The 1867 sale notice says Shouldham;
HARE 5466 says Shouldham Thorpe.
The original deeds/plan are needed before equating them.

COLTS CONSEQUENCE:
This is a parcel/acquisition-control lead only.
No historic or current Colts mill right is created by it.

========================================================================
BC. NEW PRECISE 1818 ESTATE-MAP REFERENCE — HARE 5185, 231x2
========================================================================

PASS 23 knew:
- HARE 6832 as the broad 1811-1818 estate-map source used by Historic England;
- HARE 5186, 231x2 as the 1851 estate plan.

PASS-23 EXACT SEARCH:
"Hare 5185" = no match.
"22535" = no match.
"John Wiggins" = no match.

NEW PRECISE MAP RECORD:

CATALOGUE OF BRITISH TOWN MAPS:
https://townmaps.history.ac.uk/townmap/norfolk-downham-market-1818/

CBTM:
22535.

MAP DATE:
1818.

REPOSITORY REFERENCE:
NORFOLK RO HARE 5185, 231x2.

MAP TITLE:
Plan of the entire parishes of:
- Stow Bardolph;
- Downham;
- Wimbotsham;
- Shouldham;
- Shouldham Thorpe;
- Marham;
particularly showing the Stow Hall estate belonging to Sir Thomas Hare, Bart.

SURVEYOR:
John Wiggins.

SURVEY PERIOD:
1811-1818.

SCALE:
1:25,344.

MAP CHARACTER:
Manuscript estate map with colouring for:
- roads;
- water;
- land use;
- owners;
- decorative features.

STATUS:
[Verified at Catalogue of British Town Maps record level.]

IMPORTANT:
The CBTM page states that a PDF version is downloadable.
The exact direct-PDF URL was not securely exposed by the web retriever in this pass,
so it is NOT guessed in this handover.

WHY THIS IS HIGH VALUE:
This map sits precisely in the chain:

1633 — HARE 2495
COLTS field-book estate
|
v
1749 / 1794-98
enclosure transformations
|
v
1811-1818 — HARE 5185, 231x2
whole Stow Hall estate plan
|
v
1843 tithe
|
v
1851 — HARE 5186, 231x2
|
v
post-1874 — HARE 5466.

Historic England says Colts Farm included the whole scheduled area by the early
nineteenth century.

HARE 5185 is therefore now one of the best post-enclosure parcel-control maps for:
- Colts Farm;
- Abbey Farm;
- Warren;
- roads;
- water/drains;
- pits/quarries;
- field names;
- estate ownership colours.

It does NOT by itself establish incorporeal rights.

========================================================================
BD. 1782 — NEW MANOR-LEVEL GAME / SPORTING CONTROL IN SHOULDHAM + SHOULDHAM THORPE
========================================================================

This is a genuinely new item.

PASS-23 exact searches returned no:
- "1782";
- "Mrs Moore";
- "Lady Harris";
- "Game on the several Manors";
- "sport on any of the said Manors".

SOURCE:
Norfolk Chronicle, 9 November 1782, p.4 cols 1-2,
as transcribed by Foxearth.

TRANSCRIPTION:
https://www.foxearth.org.uk/1782NorfolkChronicle.html

The notice states that GAME on several MANORS belonging to:
- MRS MOORE;
- LADY HARRIS;
in parishes including:
- Stow Bardolph;
- Wimbotsham;
- Downham;
- Fincham;
- SHOULDHAM;
- SHOULDHAM THORPE;
- Boughton;
- Winnold;
- Marham;
had been damaged by people sporting without their licence.

It then requires qualified persons not to SPORT on the said manors without leave
and threatens prosecution of unqualified trespassers.

STATUS:
[Verified at historical-newspaper transcription level.]
The original Norfolk Chronicle page image has not been inspected in this pass.

WHAT THIS DIRECTLY PROVES:
By 1782 there was active manor-level control of game/sporting permission across a
large estate group which expressly included manor holdings in Shouldham and
Shouldham Thorpe.

WHAT IT DOES NOT PROVE:
The notice does not identify WHICH named manor in Shouldham or Shouldham Thorpe
was subject to each woman's ownership.
It does not say:
- Colts;
- Trusbutts;
- Priory manor;
- Gawsells;
- Warren;
or any other specific manor name.

Therefore it cannot yet be called a Colts sporting right.

========================================================================
BE. THE 1782 SPORTING OWNERS ARE HARE-FAMILY WOMEN — ESTATE-CONTINUITY UPGRADE
========================================================================

LADY HARRIS:
A peerage source identifies Sir Thomas Harris as husband of:
MARY HARE,
daughter of Sir Thomas Hare, 4th Baronet, and Rosamond Newby.

SOURCE:
https://www.thepeerage.com/p50067.htm

A monumental-inscription source independently records Lady Harris as the wife of
Sir Thomas Harris and a daughter of Sir Thomas Hare of Stow Hall.

MRS MOORE:
The surviving Norwich Cathedral memorial of Thomas Moore, reproduced with reference
to Edmund Farrer's Church Heraldry of Norfolk, identifies his widow:
ELIZABETH,
daughter of a Sir Thomas Hare, Baronet, of Stow Bardolph.

SOURCE-FINDER / PRINTED WORK:
Edmund Farrer,
The Church Heraldry of Norfolk, vol. III.
Internet Archive item:
https://archive.org/details/churchheraldryn03farrgoog

Open Library route:
https://openlibrary.org/works/OL13137263W/The_Church_Heraldry_of_Norfolk_A_Description_of_All_Coats_of_Arms_on_..

IMPORTANT GENEALOGICAL CAUTION:
Published Hare pedigrees are not wholly consistent on Elizabeth Hare's exact parentage/
marital treatment.
The 1782 notice plus the monumental evidence nevertheless establishes a Hare-family
connection for Mrs Moore.
Do not over-resolve the genealogy here; this pass is about the rights stream.

[Inference]
The 1782 game notice is therefore best understood as evidence from within the
HARE/STOW ESTATE SUCCESSION ENVIRONMENT, rather than unrelated sporting activity by
neighbouring strangers.

========================================================================
BF. SPORTING/WARREN CONTINUITY — MATERIAL WIDER-ESTATE UPGRADE, STILL NO COLTS ORIGIN
========================================================================

The cumulative evidence can now be stated more strongly at WIDER ESTATE level:

1782
-----
Mrs Moore + Lady Harris:
game on several manors in Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe;
sporting requires their leave;
trespassers threatened with prosecution.

1845
-----
White:
- Sir Thomas Hare owns 2,674 acres in Shouldham including a rabbit warren;
- William Brighton separately listed as warrener;
- Abbey Farm and Colts Hall occupied separately.

1943
-----
Forestry/Hare stream:
Shouldham forest/warren enters Forestry Commission management under the
reported 999-year lease;
estate sporting rights are reported as retained/exercised in the Sincks.

MODERN
------
Forestry planning / local evidence continues to show the Warren/Sincks as a real
managed landscape.

PASS-24 RIGHTS RESULT:

WIDER HARE/STOW SPORTING CONTROL:
UPGRADED.

There is now evidence of practical estate/manor sporting control in:
- 1782;
- 1845;
- 1943;
- modern period.

BUT:
WATLINGTON-COLTS ORIGIN IS STILL UNPROVED.

The 1782 notice is especially important because it says only "several manors" in the
named parishes, not which Shouldham manor.

DECISIVE BRIDGE:
A deed, estate schedule, game lease/account, map or field-book entry must identify:
COLTS / TRUSBUTTS
as the manor or parcel stream carrying the game/sporting right.

========================================================================
BG. HARE 2723 PARTY NETWORK — NEW LEGAL-CAPACITY HYPOTHESIS
========================================================================

HARE 2723 itself is already PASS 22 evidence and is NOT new.

The exact scholarly note names:
- Sir Thomas Barrington;
- Sir William MARSHAM;
- Sir Nathaniel Rich;
- John Pym;
- Peter Phesaunt;
as releasing parties to Sir John Hare.

IMPORTANT SPELLING CORRECTION:
The scholarly note says:
SIR WILLIAM MARSHAM.
Do not silently change this to "Masham".

EXACT SOURCE:
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/against-friendship-an-essay-by-the-wizard-earl-of-northumberland/259664545?nway-content_model=A

NEW CONTEXT:
Cambridge's Barrington Family Letters notes that Sir Thomas Barrington's association
with John Pym became closer in January 1631 when Barrington joined the
Providence Island Company, of which Pym was treasurer.

SOURCE:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/camden-fourth-series/article/abs/barrington-family-letters/F6769F362EA93938A63A3BC4BC627D8D

History of Parliament material independently describes Sir Nathaniel Rich as closely
linked to the Earl of Warwick.

[Inference]
The releasing parties in HARE 2723 were not simply an arbitrary list of local
Shouldham occupiers.
The Barrington/Pym/Rich network makes a Warwick-associated settlement/trust/
conveyancing mechanism materially plausible.

THIS IS NOT PROOF THAT THEY WERE TRUSTEES.
Only HARE 2723's recitals and operative capacity clauses can establish:
- why each party had legal title;
- whether they acted as trustees;
- whether the estate derived through the Rich/Earl of Warwick line;
- exactly which manor(s) were released.

This contextual result increases the probability that HARE 2723 will contain useful
root-of-title recitals when inspected.

========================================================================
BH. 1749 WATLINGTON AWARD / PROB 11/148 / HARE 3085 / HARE 2495 — HARD NEGATIVE
========================================================================

PASS 24 targeted exact searches again.

NO PUBLIC FULL COPY/TRANSCRIPTION WAS RECOVERED FOR:

1. WATLINGTON, NORFOLK 1749 INCLOSURE AWARD
2. WATLINGTON 1749 AWARD MAP
3. PROB 11/148, HELE 36 — WILLIAM BUTTS
4. HARE 3085 full deed beyond the official catalogue abstract
5. HARE 2495 full 1633 field book

THIS IS NOW A DOCUMENT-ACCESS PROBLEM.

Do not spend another pass merely rediscovering:
- the Act title;
- the HARE 3085 catalogue;
- the Historic England summary;
- the PCC index;
- the HARE 2723 scholarly footnote.

The next useful action for those records is:
IMAGE / COPY / ARCHIVE ORDER / REPOSITORY DELIVERY.

========================================================================
BI. PASS 24 — RIGHTS-SURVIVAL EFFECT
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 24 EFFECT
------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------

Lordship/title HARE 2723 legal-capacity hypothesis improved.
Actual deed remains essential.

Manorial land / Colts Farm MATERIAL MAPPING UPGRADE.
HARE 5185, 231x2 is now a precise 1818 estate-map reference.
HARE 5466 now known to include an actual 1871 tenancy agreement.

Sporting / shooting / game MATERIAL WIDER-ESTATE UPGRADE.
1782 manor-level licence/prosecution evidence in Shouldham and
Shouldham Thorpe now predates the 1845 warrener and 1943
sporting-retention evidence.
COLTS ORIGIN STILL UNPROVED.

Warren Wider estate continuity strengthened circumstantially.
The 1782 notice does not identify a Warren or named manor.

Mill / milling New 1867 -> 1871 Pollard/Hare parcel clue.
No Colts mill right proved.

Commons / fold No change.
1749 award remains decisive for Colts.

Minerals/quarry No new Colts reservation.
HARE 5466 full tenancy/schedules now even more important for
landlord reservation clauses.

Roads / access HARE 5185 now gives a precise post-enclosure estate-map target.

CURRENT PRESENT-RIGHTS RESULT:
NO NEW PRESENT EXERCISABLE COLTS RIGHT IS PROVED.

BUT:
THE SPORTING/WARREN INVESTIGATION IS NOW MUCH STRONGER AS A WIDER HARE ESTATE
CONTINUITY STREAM FROM THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY FORWARD.

========================================================================
BJ. PASS 24 — NEW / UPDATED SOURCE URLS
========================================================================

NEW URLS:

1. 1782 Norfolk Chronicle game/sporting notice transcription:
https://www.foxearth.org.uk/1782NorfolkChronicle.html

2. 1818 estate map catalogue — CBTM 22535 / NRO HARE 5185 231x2:
https://townmaps.history.ac.uk/townmap/norfolk-downham-market-1818/

3. 1867 Shouldham windmill / James Pollard sale notice source:
https://norfolkmills.co.uk/Windmills/tilney-st-lawrence-towermill.html

4. Lady Harris / Mary Hare identification:
https://www.thepeerage.com/p50067.htm

5. Farrer Church Heraldry of Norfolk vol. III archive route:
https://archive.org/details/churchheraldryn03farrgoog

6. Barrington Family Letters — Barrington/Pym Providence-company association:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/camden-fourth-series/article/abs/barrington-family-letters/F6769F362EA93938A63A3BC4BC627D8D

EXISTING URL, METADATA UPGRADED:
HARE 5466:
https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/81c466ba-2759-40d3-b601-12e9249d85f6

========================================================================
BK. PASS 24 — NEXT ORDER: NO MORE GENERIC SEARCHING
========================================================================

1. HARE 2723 — obtain scan/full transcription.
2. PROB 11/148 Hele 36 — obtain scan/full transcription.
3. HARE 3085 — obtain scan/full transcription.
4. HARE 2495 — obtain complete field book.
5. HARE 5185, 231x2 — obtain/read the 1818 estate map.
6. HARE 5466, 222x5 — obtain complete 1871/post-1874 tenancy/schedule package.
7. 1749 Watlington Norfolk award/map — repository/provenance retrieval only.
8. HARE 6374/6375/6956 — c.1900 reservations/severance package.
9. MAF 9/13/27 — only after copyholders/parcels extracted.
10. actual 1943 Hare/Forestry lease.

END PASS 24

========================================================================
BL. PASS 25 — TERRITORIAL DE-COMBINATION / SEVERANCE RECONSTRUCTION
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 25 changes the analytical centre of gravity.

USER CORRECTION ADOPTED:
Because the Watlington / Colts / Trusbutts / Gawsells / Tottenhill / Shouldham
estate streams were repeatedly:
- combined under common ownership;
- administered together;
- physically reorganised;
- divided again;
- and later conveyed as distinct lordships and/or separate freehold estates,

rights such as:
- sporting / shooting / game;
- warren;
- minerals / quarries;
- timber;
- access;
- water / drainage;
- common replacement allotments;
must be reconstructed TERRITORIALLY as well as by manor name.

The correct question is not:

"Does every intermediate instrument say WATLINGTON COLTS?"

The correct questions are:

1. What land / manor territory was subject to the right when the estates were combined?
2. Was the right exercised across several manors or only a particular parcel?
3. At de-combination, what land passed and what land remained?
4. Was the right:
- transferred with the land;
- reserved from the land;
- retained with another estate;
- severed as an incorporeal right;
- extinguished/statutorily transformed?
5. Which later deed carried the benefit after the split?

This DOES NOT authorise indiscriminate importing of neighbouring rights.

A right still needs:
- territorial overlap;
- operative deed/award/reservation;
- estate schedule/account;
- court/custom evidence;
- or another defensible parcel/title bridge.

But an intermediate sporting or mineral document is NOT disqualified merely because it
uses a combined estate description rather than the individual word "Colts".

========================================================================
BM. MAJOR RE-ANALYSIS — THE 1779 PLESTOW RECORD WAS PREVIOUSLY TREATED TOO NARROWLY
========================================================================

THIS RECORD WAS ALREADY KNOWN:
NRO BL/CS 4/57.

DATE:
10 August 1779.

CATALOGUE TITLE:
Mr Plestow, Watlington Hall, to Philip Case:
asks for court books of the manors of Watlington and Tottenhill as he declines the
stewardship, with list of court books receipted by Henry Bell.

URL:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/mr-plestow-watlington-hall-to-philip-case-asks-for-court-books-of-manors-of-watlington-and-tottenhill-as-he-declines-the-stewardship-with-list-of-court-books-receipted-by-henry-bell-10-aug-1779

PASS-8 INTERPRETATION:
The earlier handover treated this Davis/Plestow/Watlington/Tottenhill court stream
primarily as a Gawsells/Tottenhill stream because White 1845 later calls Plestow:
"lord of the manor of Gawsels, in Watlington."

PASS-25 CORRECTION:
That inference was TOO NARROW.

WHY:

1. BL/CS 4/57 does NOT call the manor:
"Gawsells".

2. It expressly associates Mr Plestow at WATLINGTON HALL with custody/stewardship
of court books for BOTH:
- WATLINGTON;
- TOTTENHILL.

3. The 1930 primary conveyance later lists separately:
- Watlington;
- Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham;
- Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts;
- Tottenhill.

4. Therefore the generic eighteenth-century "Watlington" court-book stream cannot
safely be collapsed retrospectively into Gawsells merely because White 1845
names Gawsells as one manor then held by Plestow.

5. Tottenhill is not an irrelevant neighbour.
It is inside the medieval Trussbut territorial fee:
Watlington + Tottenhill + Garbodesthorp/Shouldham Thorpe + Setchey + ?Longham.

PASS-25 REVISED STATUS:
BL/CS 4/57 is now a FIRST-TIER DE-COMBINATION RECORD.

It proves at catalogue level that by 10 August 1779:
- Plestow was at Watlington Hall;
- a Watlington manor administrative stream was in his hands/environment;
- Tottenhill was administered alongside it;
- surviving court books were being transferred/custodied.

WHAT IT STILL DOES NOT PROVE:
- which Watlington manor label was represented in each court book;
- whether Colts had a separate book;
- whether Gawsells was included;
- whether freehold land passed at the same time;
- sporting/mineral reservations.

DECISIVE ACTION:
OBTAIN BL/CS 4/57 INCLUDING THE ANNEXED/RECEIPTED LIST OF COURT BOOKS.

The annexed list may identify:
- court-book dates;
- manor headings;
- separate Colts/Trusbutts books;
- Tottenhill books;
- Gawsells books;
- missing series later deposited elsewhere.

========================================================================
BN. BL/MA 34 — THE PRE-1779 COURT STREAM NOW BECOMES A DE-COMBINATION CONTROL
========================================================================

ALREADY-KNOWN RECORD:
NRO BL/MA 34.

TITLE:
Draft court books of:
- Tottenhill, 1746-1778;
- Watlington, 1746-1767;
in the handwriting of Philip Case.

URL:
https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/draft-court-books-of-tottenhill-1746-1778-and-watlington-1746-1767-in-handwriting-of-philip-case

PASS-25 TERRITORIAL SIGNIFICANCE:

BL/MA 34 ends:
- Watlington sequence: 1767;
- Tottenhill sequence: 1778.

BL/CS 4/57 then appears:
- 10 August 1779;
- Plestow at Watlington Hall;
- asks for court books of Watlington + Tottenhill;
- stewardship/custody transfer.

[Inference]
This is a very tight documentary sequence around a CHANGE IN MANORIAL
ADMINISTRATION/CUSTODY.

It may mark:
- acquisition;
- new steward;
- new lord;
- estate reorganisation;
- or transfer of archived court jurisdiction following de-combination.

The records must be read before selecting among those possibilities.

CRITICAL NEW PRIORITY:
Compare the LAST entries in BL/MA 34 with:
- the first Plestow-era court;
- BL/CS 4/57 list;
- 1749 award;
- later Plestow books.

Look specifically for:
- change of lord;
- proclamation of new lord;
- homage fealty;
- steward appointment;
- surrender/admission reciting purchase;
- lord's allotment;
- minerals;
- common/fold transformation;
- waste;
- sporting/game;
- boundaries.

========================================================================
BO. NEW 1781 PRIMARY-ERA NEWSPAPER CONTROL — THOMAS PLESTOW AT WATLINGTON HALL
========================================================================

PASS-24 EXACT DE-DUPE:
No exact prior occurrence of:
"Thomas PLESTOW, Esq., of Watlington Hall".

NEW SOURCE:
Norfolk Chronicle,
5 May 1781,
page 2 column 3,
GENUKI transcription.

URL:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/norfolk/newspapers/nfkchron/1781/05.shtml

ENTRY:
The newspaper reports the death of:
MRS PLESTOW,
wife of:
THOMAS PLESTOW, ESQ.,
OF WATLINGTON HALL.

STATUS:
[Verified at contemporary-newspaper transcription level.]
Original page image not inspected.

SIGNIFICANCE:
This independently fixes Thomas Plestow physically/socially at Watlington Hall by
May 1781.

Combined with BL/CS 4/57:

10 AUG 1779
Plestow at Watlington Hall
-> Watlington + Tottenhill court-book custody

MAY 1781
Thomas Plestow, Esq.
-> expressly "of Watlington Hall"

This is materially stronger than a generic late-eighteenth-century statement.

========================================================================
BP. 1782 HARE GAME NOTICE REINTERPRETED AGAINST THE PLESTOW 1779-1781 POSITION
========================================================================

PASS 24 established:

9 November 1782
Norfolk Chronicle.

GAME on several MANORS belonging to:
- Mrs Moore;
- Lady Harris;

in parishes including:
- SHOULDHAM;
- SHOULDHAM THORPE;
- Stow Bardolph;
- Wimbotsham;
- Downham;
- Fincham;
- Boughton;
- Winnold;
- Martham.

Sporting without licence was prohibited;
unqualified trespassers were threatened with prosecution.

SOURCE:
https://www.foxearth.org.uk/1782NorfolkChronicle.html

PASS-25 REINTERPRETATION:

The chronology is now:

1779
-----
PLESTOW
Watlington Hall
Watlington + Tottenhill court-book administrative control

1781
-----
THOMAS PLESTOW
explicitly "of Watlington Hall"

1782
-----
HARE-FAMILY WOMEN
still exercise game/sporting control across their several manor territories in:
Shouldham + Shouldham Thorpe + wider Stow estate geography.

[Inference]
THIS IS STRONG EVIDENCE THAT DE-COMBINATION WAS ALREADY UNDER WAY BY 1779-1782.

The old combined Hare estate had not simply transferred intact to Plestow.

Instead, at minimum:
- Plestow had acquired/control of Watlington/Tottenhill manorial administration
and Watlington Hall;
while:
- Hare-family owners retained substantial manor/estate territory in Shouldham/
Shouldham Thorpe over which they continued to control game.

THIS IS THE KEY TERRITORIAL BREAKTHROUGH OF PASS 25.

It is still not the operative conveyance.
But the split is now bracketed by independent records.

========================================================================
BQ. 1760-1791 HARE SUCCESSION — WHY THE 1779-1782 SPLIT WINDOW MAKES SENSE
========================================================================

COMPLETE BARONETAGE:
Hare of Stow Bardolph.

DOWNLOADABLE SOURCE ROUTE:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/75/Complete_baronetage_IA_completebaroneta02coka.pdf

SEARCH-EXPOSED PRINTED TEXT:
- Sir Thomas Hare, 4th Bart, died 21 February 1760.
- Sir George Hare, 5th Bart, succeeded; died unmarried 18 March 1764.
- original baronetcy became extinct.
- Sir Thomas Hare's daughter Mary married Sir Thomas Harris.
- Mary/Lady Harris died 24 March 1791.
- on her death the estates went to Thomas Leigh, who took the name Hare and was
later created a baronet in 1818.

IMPORTANT SOURCE CAUTION:
The same printed note says Mary "apparently inherited Stow Bardolph in 1760,
on the death of her uncle, the 5th and last Bart."

That wording is internally problematic because the same entry dates the 5th
Baronet's death to 1764.

PASS 25 DOES NOT SILENTLY CORRECT THE SOURCE.

SAFE USE:
The source securely supports the Hare family succession framework:
1760 -> 1764 extinction of old baronetcy -> Mary Harris as surviving Hare heiress
environment -> 1791 estates to Thomas Leigh/Hare.

INDEPENDENT NON-PDF SUPPORT:
European Heraldry records:
Thomas Leigh later Hare assumed the Hare surname in 1791.

URL:
https://europeanheraldry.org/united-kingdom/families/families-g-l/house-hare/

RIGHTS SIGNIFICANCE:
The late eighteenth century was a SUCCESSION / ESTATE REORGANISATION period in
the Hare family.

The 1779 Plestow acquisition/administrative control and 1782 Hare sporting notice
fall exactly inside that unsettled succession period.

========================================================================
BR. NEW 1869 WATLINGTON HALL SALE MAP — A FIRST-TIER SECOND DE-COMBINATION RECORD
========================================================================

PASS-24 EXACT DE-DUPE:
"The 1869 map was drawn up for the sale of the estate" = no prior match.

HERITAGE GATEWAY / NORFOLK HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT:
Watlington Hall Park
NHER 31972.

URL:
https://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/Gateway/Results_Single.aspx?resourceID=1002&uid=MNF31972

OFFICIAL/LOCAL HERITAGE SUMMARY:
- Watlington Hall Park is a late eighteenth-century historic parkland.
- by 1839 it was pleasure grounds with isolated stables and kitchen garden.
- plantations existed around the park by 1869.
- the park is c.100 acres.
- THE 1869 MAP WAS DRAWN UP FOR THE SALE OF THE ESTATE.
- sale particulars described the park as sheltered from the north by belts and
plantations.

SOURCE S1:
Norfolk County Council,
1992,
Inventory of Historic Parks and Gardens of Special Historic Interest in Norfolk,
Vol. 2.

STATUS:
[Verified in Heritage Gateway / NHER derivative description.]
Actual 1869 map and sale particulars not yet recovered.

WHY THIS IS CRITICAL:
The 2025 secondary title history says the Plestow family sold the manor(s) to
George Coote in 1869.

The NHER independently confirms:
A WATLINGTON HALL ESTATE SALE WAS BEING MAPPED IN 1869.

Therefore 1869 is no longer only a modern auction-catalogue date.
There is an independent historic-environment source confirming a real estate sale
event/map at precisely that date.

DECISIVE 1869 QUESTIONS:
The map/particulars must be recovered for:
- estate acreage;
- each lot;
- Hall and park;
- manor/lordship names;
- Colts/Trusbutts;
- Tottenhill;
- Gawsells;
- farms;
- minerals;
- quarries;
- sporting/game;
- timber;
- rights of common;
- rights of way;
- reservations/exceptions;
- title recitals;
- whether lordships were sold separately from freehold land.

========================================================================
BS. 1883 — DIRECT PROOF THAT FREEHOLD/SOIL AND MANORIAL LORDSHIP HAD SEPARATED
========================================================================

NEW/RE-READ SOURCE:
White's Directory of Norfolk, 1883 — Watlington.

URL:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1883.shtml

EXACT MATERIAL:
The parish contained 1604a 2r 30p.

White states:
- the soil was MOSTLY the property of the REV. CANNON BIRCH;
- Birch owned WATLINGTON HALL, park and plantations;
- G. COOTE of Sudbury was LORD OF THE MANOR OF GAWSELS IN WATLINGTON;
- Gawsells courts leet and baron continued yearly.

PASS-24 EXACT DE-DUPE:
"soil is mostly the property of the Rev. Cannon Birch" = no prior exact match.

THIS IS A MAJOR STRUCTURAL PROOF.

BY 1883:

PHYSICAL ESTATE / SOIL / HALL:
REV. CANNON BIRCH

BUT

MANORIAL LORDSHIP OF GAWSELLS:
GEORGE COOTE

Therefore:
FREEHOLD LAND OWNERSHIP ≠ MANORIAL LORDSHIP OWNERSHIP.

This is not theory.
It is directly reflected in contemporary directory evidence.

PASS-25 CONSEQUENCE:
Any attempt to determine whether sporting/mineral/warren rights passed with the
lordship MUST test whether those rights had:
- stayed with surface land;
- been reserved on sale;
- followed a manor;
- or been separately conveyed.

The existence of the lordship alone cannot answer the territorial right.

========================================================================
BT. HARE STILL HELD "COLTS FARM" AFTER THE PLESTOW/COOTE MANORIAL PERIOD
========================================================================

ALREADY-KNOWN:
HARE 5466 post-1874 package separately lists:
COLTS FARM IN SHOULDHAM.

At the same time:
- Watlington Hall estate had undergone the 1869 sale process;
- directory evidence places Gawsells lordship with Coote by 1883;
- yet Hare estate records still preserve a physical farm unit called Colts Farm.

THIS COMBINATION IS NOW MUCH MORE IMPORTANT.

[Inference — MAJOR WORKING HYPOTHESIS]

The late eighteenth/nineteenth-century de-combination may have divided:

A. INCORPOREAL MANORIAL/LORDSHIP INTERESTS
-> Plestow
-> later Coote

FROM

B. PHYSICAL FREEHOLD / FARM TERRITORY IN SHOULDHAM
-> retained within Hare/Stow Estate
-> including a unit still called Colts Farm after 1874.

IF SO:
This provides a coherent explanation for why:
- wider sporting/warren rights continue through Hare/Stow;
- Colts Farm remains in Hare schedules;
- manorial lordships appear in Plestow/Coote/Edleston deeds;
- modern title to the lordship does not automatically carry the retained Hare
surface estate rights.

THIS IS NOT YET PROVED.

DECISIVE DOCUMENTS:
- Hare -> Plestow operative conveyance c.1760s-1779;
- BL/CS 4/57 + attached court-book list;
- HARE 5185 1818 map;
- 1869 sale map + particulars;
- HARE 5466;
- c.1900 Hare/Hoff exchanges;
- 1943 lease.

========================================================================
BU. 1818 HARE 5185 REINTERPRETED AS A POST-SPLIT RETAINED-ESTATE MAP
========================================================================

PASS 24 found:
NRO HARE 5185, 231x2.
CBTM 22535.
John Wiggins survey, 1811-1818.

URL:
https://townmaps.history.ac.uk/townmap/norfolk-downham-market-1818/

COVERAGE:
- Stow Bardolph;
- Downham;
- Wimbotsham;
- Shouldham;
- Shouldham Thorpe;
- Marham;
particularly showing Stow Hall estate.

COMMENTS:
The catalogue says the map is notably minute and includes surrounding fields
even where not part of Hare estates.

PASS-25 NEW ROLE:
Because Plestow is already established at Watlington Hall and handling Watlington/
Tottenhill court books by 1779, HARE 5185 is potentially a MAP OF WHAT THE HARE
ESTATE RETAINED AFTER THE FIRST DE-COMBINATION.

THAT MAKES IT MUCH MORE VALUABLE.

The comparison should be:

PRE-SPLIT / COMBINED HARE ENVIRONMENT
|
v
1779-1782 FIRST DE-COMBINATION WINDOW
|
+--> PLESTOW:
| Watlington Hall
| Watlington/Tottenhill court administration
|
+--> HARE:
retained Stow/Shouldham/Shouldham Thorpe estate/game territory
|
v
1811-1818 HARE 5185
MAP THE RETAINED HARE TERRITORY

Then overlay:
- Colts Hall/Farm;
- Abbey Farm;
- Warren;
- 1798 allotments;
- roads;
- pits/lime ground;
- later HARE 5466 farms.

This could establish that a later Hare sporting/warren/mineral right was attached
to land that had been physically retained when the lordship split.

========================================================================
BV. TOTTENHILL — NEW QUARRY VALUE INSIDE THE PLESTOW MANORIAL TERRITORY
========================================================================

PASS-24 EXACT DE-DUPE:
"£157 are in quarries" = no prior exact match.

VISION OF BRITAIN:
Imperial Gazetteer of England and Wales,
1870-72.

URL:
https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/place/5125

TOTTENHILL:
- 1,590 acres;
- real property £2,793;
- OF WHICH £157 WERE IN QUARRIES;
- population 342;
- MANOR BELONGED TO MRS PLESTOW.

STATUS:
[Verified through GB Historical GIS / Vision of Britain transcription of
the Imperial Gazetteer.]

SIGNIFICANCE:

1. TOTTENHILL was a live Plestow manor in the same general de-combination era.

2. QUARRY VALUE was economically material enough to be separately recorded.

3. Tottenhill is part of the medieval Trussbut territorial fee complex.

4. Tottenhill is later separately named in the 1930 deed alongside:
- Watlington;
- Gawsells;
- Colts/Trusbutts.

5. Therefore mineral/quarry rights were not an abstract legal possibility in this
multi-manor estate environment.
Commercial extraction value was real.

CRITICAL LIMIT:
A Tottenhill quarry right cannot simply be relabelled a Colts mineral right.

BUT:
The evidence materially raises the priority of checking:
- 1869 sale reservations;
- Plestow/Coote deeds;
- HARE/Hoff exchanges;
- enclosure awards;
for minerals/quarries.

========================================================================
BW. 1870-72 "MRS PLESTOW" vs 1869 COOTE CLAIM — DO NOT FORCE A FALSE RECONCILIATION
========================================================================

The 2025 sale-history source states:
the Plestow family sold Watlington Colts to George Coote in 1869.

The independent 1869 NHER evidence shows:
there really was an estate sale map in 1869.

However:
the Imperial Gazetteer 1870-72 says:
THE MANOR OF TOTTENHILL BELONGED TO MRS PLESTOW.

Possible explanations include:
- source compilation lag;
- different completion dates;
- only some manors sold in 1869;
- a life interest;
- separate Tottenhill disposal;
- retention of Tottenhill by Plestow followed by later sale to Coote;
- or imprecision in the modern title history.

PASS 25 DOES NOT CHOOSE BETWEEN THESE WITHOUT A DEED.

By 1896:
Kelly's Directory identifies:
GEORGE COOTE
as lord of Tottenhill.

SOURCE:
https://forebears.io/england/norfolk/tottenhill

Thus:
Tottenhill passes from a Plestow-attributed manor environment c.1870-72
to Coote by 1896,
but the exact conveyance date/mechanism remains open.

THIS MAKES THE 1869 SALE PARTICULARS EVEN MORE IMPORTANT.

========================================================================
BX. 1883 + HARE 5466 = MANORIAL TITLE / HALL ESTATE / COLTS FARM ARE NOW THREE DISTINCT LAYERS
========================================================================

By the late nineteenth century we can now identify at least THREE separate layers:

LAYER 1 — MANORIAL LORDSHIP
---------------------------
George Coote:
lord of Gawsells by 1883.
Later also lord of Tottenhill by 1896.
Modern deed chain carries named manors/lordships.

LAYER 2 — WATLINGTON HALL / PARISH SOIL
---------------------------------------
Rev. Cannon Birch:
owns Watlington Hall and MOST OF THE SOIL of Watlington by 1883.

LAYER 3 — HARE/STOW PHYSICAL ESTATE IN SHOULDHAM
------------------------------------------------
HARE 5466:
retains named estate units after 1874 including:
- Colts Farm;
- Shouldham Abbey Farm;
- Heath Farm;
- Thorpe Manor Farm;
etc.

THIS IS A MAJOR ANSWER TO THE USER'S TERRITORIAL POINT.

The estate had genuinely DE-COMBINED INTO DIFFERENT PROPERTY TYPES AND OWNERS.

Therefore:
- lordship;
- Hall estate;
- Colts Farm surface;
- Warren/game territory;
can no longer be assumed to move together.

This structure must control every survival assessment from now on.

========================================================================
BY. SPORTING / WARREN — REVISED TERRITORIAL SURVIVAL TEST
========================================================================

OLD TEST:
"Find a sporting document that says Colts."

REVISED TEST:
1. Identify the territory subject to Hare game control before/during the split.
2. Identify whether Colts physical territory fell inside that sporting estate.
3. Identify what territory Plestow acquired.
4. Identify whether game rights were reserved by Hare.
5. Trace any later reservation through:
- HARE 5466 leases;
- HARE/Hoff exchange;
- 1943 lease;
- Sincks/Warren.

CURRENT EVIDENCE:

1782
Hare-family owners actively control game across several manors in Shouldham and
Shouldham Thorpe.

1845
Hare estate owns 2,674a in Shouldham INCLUDING rabbit warren;
dedicated warrener;
Colts Hall and Abbey Farm separately occupied.

POST-1874
HARE 5466 retains Colts Farm and Abbey Farm as named Hare estate units.

1943
Hare estate -> Forestry arrangement;
sporting rights reported retained/exercised in Sincks.

[Inference]
This now makes a CONTINUOUS HARE TERRITORIAL SPORTING/WARREN STREAM much more
plausible than a sporting right travelling automatically with the Plestow/Coote
incorporeal lordship.

BUT:
The precise boundary of Colts Farm vs Warren/Sincks remains decisive.

PRESENT CLAIM STATUS:
Do NOT yet claim the present Watlington Colts lordship owns the Warren/sporting right.
The evidence currently leans toward possible RETENTION/SEVERANCE WITH HARE TERRITORY,
but the operative split/reservation documents are missing.

========================================================================
BZ. MINERALS — REVISED TERRITORIAL SURVIVAL TEST
========================================================================

The same logic applies to minerals.

Known:
- local sand/gravel/silica/chalk resources;
- historic pits/digging ground;
- Tottenhill quarries had separately recorded economic value;
- 1930 deed conveyed lordships with subsisting rights/royalties/appurtenances.

But:
surface/freehold and lordship were already separable by the nineteenth century.

Therefore a modern Colts mineral claim requires:

A. identify parcel formerly inside Colts territory;
B. identify whether minerals were:
- included;
- excepted;
- reserved;
- enfranchised;
- allotted;
- transferred;
at de-combination.

TOP MINERAL DOCUMENTS NOW:
1. 1869 sale particulars/map;
2. Hare->Plestow conveyance;
3. HARE 5466 tenancy reservations;
4. HARE/Hoff c.1900 exchanges;
5. 1749/1798 awards;
6. MAF enfranchisement after parcel names known;
7. current/historic HMLR deeds only once parcel identified.

PASS-25 EFFECT:
Minerals remain the highest-value potentially surviving class,
but the territorial evidence makes it MORE important to distinguish:
LORDSHIP MINERALS
from
HARE/STOW RETAINED FREEHOLD MINERALS
from
TOTTENHILL QUARRY RIGHTS.

========================================================================
CA. 1869 SALE MAP + 1883 BIRCH/COOTE SPLIT — SECOND DE-COMBINATION IS NOW DIRECTLY VISIBLE
========================================================================

The late nineteenth-century chronology is now:

1845
-----
Charles Berners Plestow:
- resides Watlington Hall;
- parish land mostly his;
- lord Gawsells.

1869
-----
NHER:
Watlington Hall Estate sale map prepared.
Sale particulars survive in secondary archive inventory.

c.1870-72
----------
Mrs Plestow still reported manor owner of Tottenhill;
£157 quarry value.

POST-1874
---------
HARE 5466:
Colts Farm still a HARE ESTATE farm in Shouldham.

1883
-----
Rev Cannon Birch:
- owns Watlington Hall;
- owns most Watlington soil.

George Coote:
- lord Gawsells.

1896
-----
George Coote:
- lord Tottenhill.

Hare/Stow:
continues large Shouldham estate/lordship environment.

[Inference]
This is not simply one estate sold from Plestow to Coote.

It is a multi-stage separation involving:
- manor titles;
- Hall/freehold;
- Shouldham farm estate;
- possibly sporting/mineral rights;
moving on different tracks.

========================================================================
CB. 1930 DEED NOW READ IN LIGHT OF THE TERRITORIAL SPLITS
========================================================================

PRIMARY 1930 CONVEYANCE:
Humphreys -> Robert Holmes Edleston.

EXPRESS NAMED MANORS/LORDSHIPS:
- Watlington;
- Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham;
- Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts;
- Tottenhill.

EXPRESS GENERAL RIGHTS:
"as far as the same respectively are subsisting"
with:
"rights royalties members and appurtenances".

PASS-25 INTERPRETATION:
The 1930 deed is powerful for transmitting any SUBSISTING INCORPOREAL RIGHTS still
belonging to each lordship.

But the de-combination evidence means the word "rights" cannot recover rights that had
previously been territorially severed and retained with:
- Hare freehold;
- Birch Hall estate;
- another manor;
- another parcel owner.

Therefore 1930 becomes a CUT-OFF TEST:

IF a right was still attached to Colts in 1930:
-> modern transmission is strong.

IF it had already been severed before 1930:
-> the 1930 general words do not pull it back.

THE CORE PROJECT QUESTION IS NOW:
WHAT HAD BEEN SEVERED BEFORE 1930, AND WHAT HAD NOT?

========================================================================
CC. PASS 25 — MAJOR CORRECTION TO PRIOR "DO NOT IMPORT" LANGUAGE
========================================================================

Earlier handover wording often said:

"Do not import X because the source does not name Colts."

That rule remains valid only in a MODIFIED form.

REPLACEMENT RULE:

DO NOT ATTRIBUTE A RIGHT TO THE PRESENT COLTS LORDSHIP MERELY BECAUSE A COMMON
OWNER HELD NEIGHBOURING MANORS.

BUT:

DO NOT DISCARD A RIGHT merely because an intermediate document uses:
- Hare Estate;
- Shouldham;
- Shouldham Thorpe;
- several manors;
- Stow estate;
instead of "Colts",

IF:
- the estates were then combined;
- the right was territorial;
- and later division/reservation can be traced.

The attribution is decided at the DE-COMBINATION / SEVERANCE EVENT.

This correction applies particularly to:
- game/sporting;
- warren;
- minerals/quarries;
- timber;
- water/drainage;
- rights over waste/common/allotted lands.

========================================================================
CD. PASS 25 — NEW DECISIVE DOCUMENT ORDER
========================================================================

TIER 1 — DE-COMBINATION / CURRENT-RIGHTS DECISIVE
-------------------------------------------------

1. HARE -> PLESTOW OPERATIVE CONVEYANCE
DATE WINDOW:
after/around Hare succession changes, definitely before/around Aug 1779.
TARGET:
Watlington / Colts / Trusbutts / Tottenhill / Hall.
EXTRACT:
land, manors, appurtenances, sporting, game, Warren, minerals, timber, reservations.

2. NRO BL/CS 4/57 — FULL ORIGINAL + ANNEXED COURT-BOOK LIST
10 Aug 1779.
This may identify exactly which manorial records passed to Plestow.

3. NRO BL/MA 34 — FULL 1746-1778/1767 COURT SEQUENCE
Find change of lord/administration and enclosure effects.

4. 1869 WATLINGTON HALL ESTATE SALE MAP + PARTICULARS
Now independently evidenced by NHER.
This is potentially the single best second-severance document.

5. NRO HARE 5185, 231x2 — 1811-1818 MAP
Treat as post-first-split retained Hare territory map.

6. NRO HARE 5466 — FULL PACKAGE
Compare Colts Farm vs Abbey Farm vs retained rights.

7. HARE 6374/1-4 + HARE 6375/1-72 + HARE 6956/1-5
c.1900 Hare/Hoff exchanges:
identify surface/right reservations before 1926.

8. ACTUAL 1943 HARE -> FORESTRY LEASE + PLAN
determine sporting/mineral/timber/access reservations and burdened territory.

TIER 2 — STATUTORY TRANSFORMATION
---------------------------------

9. 1749 Watlington Norfolk award + map.
10. 1794-98 Shouldham/Thorpe award + map.
11. MAF 9/13/27 after copyholders/parcels are extracted.

TIER 3 — EARLIER TITLE ARCHITECTURE
-----------------------------------

12. HARE 2723 1632.
13. HARE 2495 1633.
14. HARE 3085 1628.
15. PROB 11/148 Hele 36.

These remain historically important,
but for CURRENT substantive-right survival the late-eighteenth/nineteenth-century
de-combination documents now outrank them.

========================================================================
CE. PASS 25 — NEW SOURCE URLS
========================================================================

1. Norfolk Chronicle 5 May 1781 — Thomas Plestow of Watlington Hall:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/norfolk/newspapers/nfkchron/1781/05.shtml

2. Heritage Gateway / NHER Watlington Hall Park — 1869 estate-sale map:
https://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/Gateway/Results_Single.aspx?resourceID=1002&uid=MNF31972

3. White 1883 Watlington — Birch soil/Hall vs Coote Gawsells lordship:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1883.shtml

4. Vision of Britain — Tottenhill 1870-72, £157 quarries, Mrs Plestow manor:
https://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/place/5125

5. Complete Baronetage Hare succession PDF:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/75/Complete_baronetage_IA_completebaroneta02coka.pdf

6. European Heraldry — Thomas Leigh later Hare / 1791 surname succession:
https://europeanheraldry.org/united-kingdom/families/families-g-l/house-hare/

EXISTING SOURCES REINTERPRETED, NOT DUPLICATED:
- BL/CS 4/57;
- BL/MA 34;
- HARE 5185;
- HARE 5466;
- 1782 Foxearth game notice;
- White 1845;
- HARE 6956 / 6374 / 6375;
- 1930 private conveyance evidence already in cumulative handover.

========================================================================
CF. PASS 25 — BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

PASS 25 materially changes the model.

THE ESTATE DID NOT SIMPLY MOVE AS ONE BLOCK.

The evidence now supports a working pattern of:

COMBINED HARE MANOR / ESTATE ENVIRONMENT
|
v
FIRST DE-COMBINATION BY 1779-1782
|
+----> PLESTOW:
| Watlington Hall
| Watlington + Tottenhill manorial administration
|
+----> HARE FAMILY:
retained wider Stow/Shouldham/Shouldham-Thorpe
territorial estate + game control
|
v
1818 HARE 5185
map surviving Hare territory
|
v
1845
Hare Warren / warrener / Shouldham acreage
Plestow Watlington Hall / Gawsells
|
v
1869 SECOND SALE / DE-COMBINATION
Watlington Hall estate map + sale particulars
|
+----> BIRCH:
| Hall + most Watlington soil by 1883
|
+----> COOTE:
| Gawsells lordship by 1883
| Tottenhill lordship by 1896
|
+----> HARE:
Colts Farm still appears in post-1874 Hare estate schedules
wider Shouldham sporting/warren stream continues
|
v
1930
named manorial titles bundled again in Humphreys -> Edleston deed
WITH WHATEVER RIGHTS WERE STILL SUBSISTING.

THIS IS THE NEW SURVIVAL TEST.

SPORTING/WARREN:
Historical combined/retained Hare territorial stream is now strong.
Whether the present Colts lordship owns it depends principally on whether it was
reserved/retained when the lordship/freehold split.

MINERALS:
Potentially valuable and historically real in the same multi-manor territory.
Again, de-combination reservations decide ownership.

FOLD/COMMON:
Enclosure transformation remains primary.

LORDSHIP:
Strong modern transmission.
But lordship ownership does not prove ownership of previously severed surface-based
sporting/mineral rights.

THE MOST IMPORTANT MISSING DOCUMENT IS NOW:
THE OPERATIVE HARE -> PLESTOW DE-COMBINATION DEED,
followed by:
THE 1869 SALE PARTICULARS/MAP.

END PASS 25

========================================================================
CG. PASS 26 — TERRITORIAL TITLE STREAMS, WIGGENHALL LIMBS & FORESTRY FOOTPRINT
========================================================================

[Unverified]

PASS 26 continues directly from PASS 25 and applies the territorial-first rule.

STRICT DE-DUPE:
Every candidate below was exact-checked against PASS 25 before being counted as new.

MAJOR CORRECTION TO PASS 25:
PASS 25 temporarily elevated an unknown "Hare -> Plestow" conveyance as if it might
represent the first simple de-combination event.

PASS 26 shows that model is TOO SIMPLE.

By 1721, while Sir Ralph Hare was separately identified at Stow Bardolph, there were
already multiple substantial gentlemen specifically "of Watlington", including John
Davis.

Therefore:
- Hare/Stow;
- Davis/Watlington;
- and other Watlington landed streams
already co-existed before Plestow's late-eighteenth-century appearance.

The task is NOT to force one Hare -> Plestow deed.

The correct task is to reconstruct WHICH EXISTING WATLINGTON STREAM Plestow acquired
or inherited, and then determine whether/when that stream included:
- Colts/Trusbutts;
- Gawsells;
- Tottenhill;
- Hall/freehold;
- Wiggenhall parcels;
while the Hare/Stow estate retained other Shouldham / Colts-associated physical land.

========================================================================
CH. NEW — 1721: HARE/STOW AND MULTIPLE WATLINGTON ESTATES EXIST SIDE BY SIDE
========================================================================

SCHOLARLY TRANSCRIPTION:
Edward Gregg,
The English Ministers and Jacobitism between the Rebellions of 1715 and 1745.

OPEN HTML SOURCE:
https://dokumen.pub/the-english-ministers-and-jacobitism-between-the-rebellions-of-1715-and-1745-9781487595593.html

APPENDIX:
"The Norfolk List of 1721"

ORIGINAL SOURCE CITED BY THE SCHOLARLY EDITION:
Royal Archives, Stuart 65/10.

The original spellings are stated to have been retained.

RELEVANT ENTRIES INCLUDE:

SIR RALPH HARE
of STOW BARDOLPH
yearly estate: £3,000

SAMUEL TAYLOR
of WATLINGTON
£1,000

SAMUEL BURKIN
of WATLINGTON
£500

JOHN DAVIS
of WATLINGTON
£700

PASS-25 DE-DUPE:
No prior exact occurrence of:
- "Norfolk List of 1721";
- "John Davis of Watlington £700";
- "Samuel Taylor of Watlington".

STATUS:
[Verified at scholarly-transcription level.]
The original Royal Archives document has not been inspected.

CRITICAL TITLE CONSEQUENCE:
This is powerful evidence AGAINST a monolithic model in which:
HARE = all relevant Watlington/Shouldham property
until a later transfer to Plestow.

Instead, by 1721 there were already:
- a very substantial Hare/Stow estate;
- at least three independently identified Watlington gentlemen with significant
landed incomes.

[Inference]
The Davis/Watlington court and Tottenhill stream visible later in BL/MA 34 may be the
continuation of an already independent Watlington landed interest, rather than land
first severed from Hare immediately before Plestow.

IDENTITY CAUTION:
Do NOT assume without proof that:
- the 1721 John Davis;
- the donor of Holybreads;
- the 1764 High Sheriff John Davis;
are one individual.
They may be successive generations or separate men.

========================================================================
CI. NEW — HOLYBREADS: A DAVIS LAND PARCEL LINKS WATLINGTON + TOTTENHILL
========================================================================

WHITE 1845:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1845.shtml

WHITE 1883:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1883.shtml

CURRENT PARISH-COUNCIL REPRODUCTION:
https://watlington-norfolk-pc.gov.uk/edward-shouldhams-charity-history/

All reproduce the material fact that:

JOHN DAVIS
left a yearly rent-charge of:
£5 4s.

charged on land called:
HOLYBREADS.

The benefit was distributed between poor persons of BOTH:
- WATLINGTON;
- TOTTENHILL.

KELLY 1896 / TOTTENHILL SOURCE-FINDER:
https://forebears.io/england/norfolk/tottenhill

The Kelly-derived text says Davis's charity:
- was £5 4s yearly;
- was "left in 1747";
- was distributed weekly in twelve small loaves:
8 for Watlington;
4 for Tottenhill.

PASS-25 DE-DUPE:
No exact prior occurrence of:
- "Holybreads";
- "Davis's charity";
- "left in 1747".

STATUS:
[Verified at nineteenth-century directory-transcription level for the land charge.]
[Unverified as to the original 1747 will/deed because it has not been recovered.]

TERRITORIAL SIGNIFICANCE:
HOLYBREADS is now a concrete parcel name in the Davis / Watlington / Tottenhill stream.

This is much more useful than generic owner names because it can potentially be located
through:
- tithe apportionment;
- enclosure map;
- land tax;
- estate map;
- conveyances;
- charity records.

It also proves that the Watlington/Tottenhill administrative relationship had a real
land-based financial expression.

DECISIVE NEXT:
LOCATE HOLYBREADS ON THE 1749 / TITHE / 1818 / LATER MAPS.

If Holybreads can be mapped, it can act as a discriminator between:
- Davis/Gawsells/Tottenhill property;
and
- retained Hare/Colts/Shouldham property.

========================================================================
CJ. NEW CONTROL — JOHN DAVIS OF WATLINGTON AS HIGH SHERIFF IN 1764
========================================================================

SECONDARY LIST SOURCE:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Sheriff_of_Norfolk

The published list identifies:

1764:
JOHN DAVIS, OF WATLINGTON.

PASS-25 DE-DUPE:
No prior exact occurrence of:
"1764 John Davis"
or a John Davis / High Sheriff entry.

STATUS:
[Verified only at secondary-list level.]
A primary appointment/sheriff roll has not been recovered in this pass.

IDENTITY CAUTION:
Do NOT equate this man automatically with:
- the John Davis of 1721;
- the Holybreads donor.

SIGNIFICANCE:
A John Davis of Watlington was sufficiently prominent to appear as county sheriff in
the exact period covered by:
- BL/MA 34 Watlington court material, 1746-1767;
- the 1749 enclosure;
- the late Davis/Plestow administrative transition.

This strengthens the need to reconstruct the DAVIS TITLE STREAM independently before
attempting to assign generic "Watlington" records to Colts or Gawsells.

========================================================================
CK. NEW — 1828 C.B. PLESTOW FREEHOLD BOUNDARY IN WIGGENHALL ST MARY MAGDALEN
========================================================================

BRITISH NEWSPAPER ARCHIVE SEARCH RESULT:
Norwich Mercury,
19 July 1828;
9 August 1828;
16 August 1828.

SEARCH ROUTE:
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/search/results/1800-01-01/1849-12-31?basicsearch=james+becket&phrasesearch=james+becket&place=norwich+norfolk+england&retrievecountrycounts=false

The exposed advertisement text describes land in:

WIGGENHALL SAINT MARY MAGDALEN

by / at the road:

WIGGENHALL SAINT MARY MAGDALEN TO WATLINGTON,

abutting:

towards the WEST:
LAND OF C. B. PLESTOW, ESQ.

towards the EAST:
LAND OF JAMES BECKET.

The advertised parcel carried:
LAND-TAX 12s per annum.

PASS-25 DE-DUPE:
No prior exact occurrence of:
- "C. B. Plestow";
- "James Becket";
- the Wiggenhall Saint Mary Magdalen -> Watlington road phrase;
- 16 August 1828.

STATUS:
[Verified at British Newspaper Archive search-extract level.]
Full newspaper page has not been downloaded in this pass.

WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT:
The 1597 Colts/Trusbutts conveyance stream is already known to extend beyond central
Watlington into:
- Runcton Holme;
- Thorpland;
- Watlington;
- Tottenhill;
- Setchey;
- the Wiggenhalls;
- Terrington;
- Marshland.

A secondary spelling expansion also specifically names:
Wigenhall St Mary Magdalen.

PASS 26 now gives direct nineteenth-century evidence that PLESTOW land also reached
Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen beside the Watlington road.

THIS DOES NOT PROVE:
C.B. Plestow's 1828 Wiggenhall land was descended from Colts.

BUT:
It proves Plestow's physical territorial footprint was NOT confined to Watlington Hall
or central Watlington.

DECISIVE TEST:
Map the 1828 Plestow boundary against:
- 1597 Colts extended parcels;
- Fitton enclosure claims;
- drainage-estate land;
- tithe records;
- land tax;
- 1818 estate mapping.

========================================================================
CL. NEW — 1781 LIMEBURNER CONNECTS WATLINGTON TO WIGGENHALL ST MARY MAGDALEN
========================================================================

OFFICIAL LONDON GAZETTE SOURCE:
Issue 12215, page 8.

DIRECT PDF:
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/12215/page/8/data.pdf

The insolvency notice identifies:

THOMAS HARRISON

formerly of:
WATLINGTON

late of:
WIGENHALL ST MARY MAGDALEN

both in Norfolk,

occupation:
LIME-BURNER.

NORFOLK CHRONICLE TRANSCRIPTION / DATE CONTROL:
4 & 11 August 1781 extracts:
https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=24499.0

PASS-25 DE-DUPE:
No prior exact occurrence of:
- Thomas Harrison;
- limeburner;
- formerly of Watlington;
- this Watlington -> Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen occupational connection.

STATUS:
[Verified in official Gazette search-extracted text.]
[Corroborated by historical-newspaper transcription.]
The exact kiln/pit/lease has NOT been located.

TERRITORIAL / MINERAL SIGNIFICANCE:
This is no longer merely geological potential.

A real late-eighteenth-century LIME-BURNER operated across the precise Watlington /
Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen geography that overlaps the wider historical Colts estate
footprint.

It does NOT prove:
- Harrison occupied Colts land;
- lime was dug from a Colts parcel;
- lordship mineral rights;
- a quarry reservation.

But it materially raises the value of searching:
- leases;
- land tax;
- insolvency schedules;
- kiln sites;
- lime pits;
- road-side industrial parcels;
in the Wiggenhall limb of the estate.

========================================================================
CM. NEW — 1757 WIGGENHALL DRAINAGE ACT CREATED A STATUTORY LAND-VESTING STREAM
========================================================================

GENUKI / WIGGENHALL ST MARY MAGDALEN LAND & PROPERTY:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/wiggenhall_st_marymag/

This lists:

WIGGENHALL DRAINAGE ACT 1757

"An act for draining and preserving certain marsh and fen lands and low grounds, in
the parish of Wiggenhall Saint Mary Magdalen, in the county of Norfolk."

It also lists later drainage Acts:
- 1783;
- 1833;
- 1878.

KING'S LYNN INTERNAL DRAINAGE BOARD MINUTES:
30 January 2015.

DIRECT PDF:
https://www.wlma.org.uk/uploads/KLIDB_Minutes_30_01_2015.pdf

The official successor-board minutes state that a predecessor body:

WIGGENHALL SAINT MARY MAGDALEN COMMISSIONERS

had land and ground forming:

THE GREAT BANK

also known as:

THE BORDER BANK ESTATE

VESTED in them under the 1757 Act.

The minutes further state:
- most of the estate had been sold long ago;
- the successor Board still owned approximately 22 acres in 2015;
- those acres had for many years been let to Smart Brothers.

PASS-25 DE-DUPE:
No prior exact occurrence of:
- Border Bank Estate;
- Great Bank;
- the Wiggenhall commissioners;
- the surviving 22 acres;
- Wiggenhall Drainage Act.

STATUS:
[Verified at official successor-board search-extracted minute level.]
Direct PDF is supplied above.
A web screenshot could not be obtained from the PDF cache during this pass.

MAJOR RIGHTS SIGNIFICANCE:
This is a concrete example inside an historic Colts-associated parish of:

PRIVATE / MANORIAL LAND
->
STATUTORY VESTING IN COMMISSIONERS
->
LATER SALES
->
RESIDUAL SUCCESSOR-BOARD LAND.

Therefore an old parcel/right in the Wiggenhall limb may have been displaced or
reallocated by drainage statute, not simply carried with a lordship.

DECISIVE TEST:
Determine whether any 1597 Colts parcel overlapped:
- Great Bank;
- Border Bank Estate;
- drainage works / marsh/fen subject land.

========================================================================
CN. NEW — FITTON ENCLOSURE 1807/1808: 58 CLAIMS IN THE WIGGENHALL PARISHES
========================================================================

SAME GENUKI LAND & PROPERTY SOURCE:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/wiggenhall_st_marymag/

NEW ITEMS:

FITTON IN WIGGENHALL INCLOSURE ACT 1807

Act title:
for inclosing lands of the manor of Fitton,
in the parish of Wigginhall Saint Mary's
and other parishes in Norfolk.

STATEMENT OF CLAIMS: FITTON, 1808

Description:
- manor of Fitton;
- lands in the Wiggenhall parishes;
- 58 claims;
- drawn up pursuant to the Act of Inclosure.

PASS-25 DE-DUPE:
No prior occurrence of:
- Fitton;
- 1808 statement of claims;
- 58 claims;
- Fitton Inclosure Act.

SIGNIFICANCE:
This creates a very specific archive/source target for the 1828 Plestow Wiggenhall
land and any remnant of the historic Colts Wiggenhall limbs.

SEARCH THE 58 CLAIMS FOR:
- PLESTOW;
- DAVIS;
- HARE;
- COLT / COLTS;
- TRUSBUT / TRUSSBUTTS;
- HARRISON;
- BECKET;
- field names later found on tithe maps.

This is a far better route than generic Wiggenhall searching.

========================================================================
CO. NEW — THE FORESTRY "SHOULDHAM" TERRITORY CHANGED SIZE AFTER THE 1943 LEASE
========================================================================

OFFICIAL FORESTRY COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORTS:

1953 REPORT:
https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/1954/04/fcar_1953.pdf

Search-extracted official table:
SHOULDHAM, NORFOLK
TOTAL AREA:
956 acres.

The same row gives approximately:
- 64 afforested during year;
- 27 replanted;
- 777 under plantations;
- 75 plantable;
- 104 agricultural / unplantable etc.

1954 REPORT:
https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/1955/05/fcar_1954.pdf

SHOULDHAM, NORFOLK
TOTAL AREA:
1,290 acres.

1955:
https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/1956/07/fcar_1955.pdf

SHOULDHAM remains:
1,290 acres.

1958:
official annual report likewise lists:
1,290 acres.

1960 REPORT:
https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/1961/02/fcar_1960.pdf

The table no longer treats Shouldham as the standalone name.

A note states:

LYNN FOREST
comprises the former:
- GAYWOOD;
- SHOULDHAM FORESTS.

PASS-25 DE-DUPE:
"1,290" had no prior match.
No prior territorial analysis of the 956 -> 1,290 increase existed.

CALCULATION:
1954 total minus 1953 total:
1,290 - 956 = 334 acres.

[Inference]
Something changed in the Forestry Commission's Shouldham reporting footprint between
the 1953 and 1954 annual reports:
- acquisition;
- additional lease;
- boundary adjustment;
- reclassification;
or another administrative change.

THE CAUSE IS NOT YET PROVED.

CRITICAL RIGHTS CONSEQUENCE:
DO NOT treat:
- the current Shouldham forest;
- the 1954-1959 1,290-acre forest;
- the 1953 956-acre unit;
- the original 1943 leased land;
as automatically co-extensive.

This is crucial for:
- sporting reservation;
- Warren;
- minerals;
- timber;
- access;
because a right reserved in 1943 may burden only the original lease parcels, not later
added territory.

NEW ARCHIVE SEARCH WINDOW:
1953-1954:
- supplemental lease;
- acquisition;
- exchange;
- variation;
- boundary plan;
- Forestry Commission estate correspondence.

POST-1960:
search under:
LYNN FOREST
as well as:
SHOULDHAM FOREST.

========================================================================
CP. FORESTRY / SPORTING CONSEQUENCE — TERRITORIAL FOOTPRINT NOW OUTRANKS NAME
========================================================================

ALREADY KNOWN:
- 1943 reported Hare Estate -> Forestry Commission 999-year lease;
- sporting rights retained by the estate;
- exercised in the Sincks;
- Shouldham currently described by Forestry England as leasehold;
- Sincks has been publicly identified as Stow Estates land.

PASS 26 adds:
THE FORESTRY TERRITORY ITSELF WAS NOT STATIC.

956 acres in 1953
|
| +334 acres / reporting change
v
1,290 acres in 1954-1958
|
v
1960
Shouldham administratively merged into LYNN FOREST with Gaywood.

Therefore:
"Sporting rights retained over Shouldham Forest"
must always be tied to:
- the relevant plan;
- lease version;
- supplemental deed;
- parcel boundary;
not merely the later forest name.

This makes recovery of the actual 1943 plan AND the 1953-54 change documents a
first-tier current-rights task.

========================================================================
CQ. 1869 WATLINGTON HALL SALE — FULLER TERRITORIAL DETAIL FROM NHER
========================================================================

SOURCE ALREADY ADDED IN PASS 25:
NHER 31972 / Watlington Hall Park.

URL:
https://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/Gateway/Results_Single.aspx?resourceID=1002&uid=MNF31972

PASS 26 does NOT count this as a new URL.

FULLER DETAILS NOW EXTRACTED:
- late-eighteenth-century parkland;
- Faden's map shows the Hall in a designed landscape;
- 1839 tithe map shows:
* formal garden / shrubbery / pleasure ground about 2.5 acres;
* stables and coach-house isolated in the park;
* kitchen gardens about 2 acres;
* main park about 46 acres;
* north-east pasture about 11 acres;
- dykes formed boundaries;
- roads bounded the park west, south and east;
- the 1869 sale map was drawn for the sale of the estate;
- the park was around 100 acres at sale/map stage;
- sale particulars referred to belts and plantations.

SIGNIFICANCE:
The 1869 sale was plainly a PHYSICAL ESTATE sale with mapped land and landscape,
not merely an incorporeal manor-title transaction.

That strengthens the need to recover its actual lots and reservations to distinguish:
- Hall/freehold sold;
- manor title sold;
- timber;
- game;
- minerals;
- roads/water/dykes;
- any land retained.

========================================================================
CR. PASS 26 — REVISED TITLE-STREAM MODEL
========================================================================

THE WORKING MODEL IS NOW:

EARLY / MEDIEVAL
---------------
Trussbut / Colts territorial estate:
Watlington + Shouldham-side demesne
plus extended land in:
Tottenhill, Setchey, Runcton Holme, Wiggenhalls, Terrington, Marshland, etc.

EARLY 17TH C.
-------------
Gawdy/Rich/Hare common-ownership environment grows by multiple acquisitions.

BY 1721
-------
THIS IS ALREADY NOT ONE SINGLE TERRITORIAL BLOCK:

HARE / STOW:
Sir Ralph Hare of Stow Bardolph

PARALLEL WATLINGTON LANDED STREAMS:
Samuel Taylor
Samuel Burkin
John Davis

MID 18TH C.
-----------
Davis/Watlington/Tottenhill stream:
- BL/MA 34;
- Holybreads rent-charge;
- 1749 enclosure;
- John Davis prominence.

1779-1782
---------
PLESTOW:
Watlington Hall;
Watlington + Tottenhill court-book administration.

HARE FAMILY:
retained Shouldham / Shouldham-Thorpe manor territory with game control.

EARLY 19TH C.
-------------
PLESTOW physical land reaches at least:
Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen / Watlington road boundary.

HARE:
1818 HARE map of retained Stow/Shouldham estates.

1869+
-----
Watlington Hall physical estate sold/reorganised.

BY 1883
-------
HALL / MOST WATLINGTON SOIL:
Birch.

GAWSELLS LORDSHIP:
Coote.

HARE PHYSICAL SHOULDHAM ESTATE:
still includes Colts Farm after 1874.

c.1900
------
Hare/Hoff reciprocal land exchanges:
pre-1926 severance/reservation checkpoint.

1930
----
Humphreys -> Edleston bundles named incorporeal manors/lordships:
Watlington;
Gawsells with West Dereham;
Colts/Trusbutts;
Tottenhill;
with only rights then subsisting.

1943 ONWARD
-----------
Forestry lease/use affects a defined Shouldham territory;
sporting retained;
but Forestry footprint later changes from at least 956 to 1,290 acres and then is
administratively merged into Lynn Forest.

THIS MODEL BETTER EXPLAINS WHY:
- historic manor title;
- Colts Farm surface;
- Warren/Sincks;
- Watlington Hall;
- Tottenhill;
- Wiggenhall limbs;
can all have different modern ownership/right outcomes.

========================================================================
CS. PASS 26 — RIGHTS SURVIVAL EFFECT
========================================================================

RIGHT / INCIDENT PASS 26 EFFECT
------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------

LORDSHIP / TITLE MAJOR TITLE-MODEL CORRECTION.
Do not force Hare -> Plestow as one first-split deed.
A parallel Davis/Watlington stream existed by 1721.

MANORIAL LAND / COLTS Extended territorial limbs now matter more.
Plestow had physical land in Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen by 1828.
Whether it was Colts-derived is open.

SPORTING / GAME Strong Hare/Stow territorial stream remains.
1943 burdened territory must be identified from lease plan.
Later Forestry additions cannot automatically inherit the same reservation.

WARREN Same.
Current Warren/forest geography cannot be assumed identical to 1943 lease footprint.

MINERALS / LIME MATERIAL TERRITORIAL UPGRADE.
Thomas Harrison, limeburner, links Watlington with Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen in 1781.
No Colts mineral title yet proved.

DRAINAGE / WORKS MAJOR NEW STATUTORY MODEL.
1757 Wiggenhall Act vested Great/Border Bank land in commissioners;
later sales/residual 22a show statutory displacement can persist.

COMMON / ENCLOSURE Fitton 1807/1808 adds a 58-claim Wiggenhall source for tracing Plestow /
possible Colts extended parcels.

RENTS Holybreads is a concrete Davis parcel carrying a cross-Watlington/Tottenhill
rent-charge; useful discriminator from other title streams.

ROADS / ACCESS 1828 Plestow boundary on Wiggenhall->Watlington road is a concrete
territorial mapping point.

TIMBER 1869 sale + Hare leases + Forestry plan remain necessary to decide
which timber reservations followed land.

CURRENT PRESENT-RIGHTS RESULT:
NO NEW PRESENT EXERCISABLE COLTS RIGHT IS PROVED.

BUT:
PASS 26 materially narrows the severance problem and identifies several concrete
parcel/statutory streams which can prove WHY a historic right did or did not remain
with the lordship by 1930.

========================================================================
CT. PASS 26 — NEW DECISIVE ORDER
========================================================================

1. DAVIS / WATLINGTON ROOT-OF-TITLE
- identify John Davis title/deeds/will(s);
- map HOLYBREADS;
- read BL/MA 34;
- read BL/CS 4/57 annexed court-book list;
- determine which "Watlington" manor Plestow actually received/administered.

2. 1808 FITTON STATEMENT OF CLAIMS — ALL 58 CLAIMS
Search Plestow/Davis/Hare/Colts/Trusbutts/Harrison/Becket and field names.

3. 1828 WIGGENHALL PLESTOW PARCEL
Recover complete advertisement/title description and map onto tithe/enclosure.

4. 1869 WATLINGTON HALL SALE MAP + PARTICULARS
Extract all lots, manors, freehold, minerals, game, timber, rights, reservations.

5. HARE 5185 — 1818 RETAINED HARE TERRITORY MAP
Overlay Colts Farm / Abbey Farm / Warren / roads / pits / Plestow-held land.

6. HARE 5466
Full tenancy/schedules; landlord reservations across named estate units.

7. HARE 6374/6375 + HARE 6956
c.1900 reciprocal exchange; exact pre-1926 reservations and parcel colours.

8. 1943 HARE -> FORESTRY LEASE + PLAN.

9. 1953-1954 FORESTRY ADDITION / VARIATION DOCUMENTS
explain 956 -> 1,290 acres.

10. POST-1960 RECORDS UNDER "LYNN FOREST"
not just "Shouldham Forest".

11. 1749 WATLINGTON AWARD + MAP.
12. 1757/1783 etc WIGGENHALL DRAINAGE RECORDS.
13. 1794-98 SHOULDHAM AWARD + MAP.
14. MAF 9/13/27 only after exact parcels/copyholders reconstructed.

========================================================================
CU. PASS 26 — NEW SOURCE / DOWNLOAD URLS
========================================================================

1. Scholarly transcription of Royal Archives 1721 Norfolk list:
https://dokumen.pub/the-english-ministers-and-jacobitism-between-the-rebellions-of-1715-and-1745-9781487595593.html

2. Watlington Parish Council / Holybreads charity reproduction:
https://watlington-norfolk-pc.gov.uk/edward-shouldhams-charity-history/

3. Kelly 1896 / Tottenhill / Davis charity source route:
https://forebears.io/england/norfolk/tottenhill

4. British Newspaper Archive 1828 C.B. Plestow / James Becket search route:
https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/search/results/1800-01-01/1849-12-31?basicsearch=james+becket&phrasesearch=james+becket&place=norwich+norfolk+england&retrievecountrycounts=false

5. Official London Gazette — Thomas Harrison limeburner:
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/12215/page/8/data.pdf

6. GENUKI Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen land/property page:
https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/wiggenhall_st_marymag/

7. King's Lynn Internal Drainage Board 2015 minutes / Border Bank Estate:
https://www.wlma.org.uk/uploads/KLIDB_Minutes_30_01_2015.pdf

8. Forestry Commission 1953 annual report:
https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/1954/04/fcar_1953.pdf

9. Forestry Commission 1954 annual report:
https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/1955/05/fcar_1954.pdf

10. Forestry Commission 1955 annual report:
https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/1956/07/fcar_1955.pdf

11. Forestry Commission 1960 annual report:
https://cdn.forestresearch.gov.uk/1961/02/fcar_1960.pdf

EXISTING URL RE-USED / ENRICHED:
- White 1845 Watlington;
- White 1883 Watlington;
- NHER 31972 Watlington Hall Park;
- BL/MA 34;
- BL/CS 4/57;
- HARE 5185;
- HARE 5466;
- HARE/Hoff exchange records.

========================================================================
CV. PASS 26 — BOTTOM LINE
========================================================================

The strongest new result is NOT a new right.

It is a materially better explanation of the title/territorial structure.

The evidence now shows that:
1. Hare/Stow and multiple Watlington landed interests already co-existed by 1721.
2. The Davis/Watlington/Tottenhill stream therefore cannot be treated simply as a
late severance from Hare without proof.
3. Plestow later controlled Watlington/Tottenhill administration and also owned
physical land out in Wiggenhall St Mary Magdalen.
4. The old Colts estate likewise had extended Wiggenhall geography.
5. Statutory drainage and enclosure in Wiggenhall created additional pathways by
which old estate land/rights could be vested, allotted and sold away.
6. Real lime-burning activity connected Watlington and Wiggenhall in 1781, increasing
the commercial importance of the mineral/lime investigation.
7. The Forestry "Shouldham" footprint itself expanded by 334 acres between the
1953 and 1954 annual-report totals, so the current forest cannot be equated
automatically with the original 1943 lease territory.
8. From 1960 the relevant Forestry archive trail must also be searched under LYNN FOREST.

THE CURRENT-RIGHTS INVESTIGATION HAS THEREFORE BECOME MUCH MORE PRECISE:

FOR EACH RIGHT:
historic territorial parcel
-> statutory transformation (if any)
-> owner/estate at de-combination
-> express reservation/severance
-> 1930 attachment test
-> modern chain.

END PASS 26

========================================================================
CW. PASS 27 — FINAL RIGHTS-SURVIVAL CLOSURE
========================================================================

[UNVERIFIED SYNTHESIS — evidence-based legal/historical assessment,
not a court or registry determination]

PURPOSE
-------
Pass 27 is an adjudication of the accumulated Pass 26 record. It adds no recycled
finding and does not reopen the broad historical search.

DISPOSITIVE CURRENT STANCE
--------------------------
1. The incorporeal lordship/title survives and is accepted for project purposes.
2. No substantive manorial right is presently proved to be attached to, owned with,
or exercisable through the current Watlington Colts/Trussbutts lordship.
3. That does not mean every possible class of right was extinguished. Minerals,
associated working powers, sporting rights, warren/chase, piscary, market
franchises and limited works incidents can survive in law in a proper case.
4. For Colts, however, the accumulated record does not prove the required combination
of Colts-specific origin, attachment at the relevant severance, benefited/burdened
property, modern benefit chain and Land Registry priority.
5. Several alleged rights were instead extinguished/transformed, separated from the
lordship, or shown only in distinct Shouldham Priory, Baynard, Hare/Stow or superior
Wormegay-honour streams.

FINAL CATEGORIES
----------------
SURVIVES — TITLE ONLY: 1
SEPARATED FROM LORDSHIP: 2
EXTINGUISHED / TRANSFORMED: 7
CAPABLE BUT UNPROVED FOR COLTS: 6
ATTRIBUTABLE ELSEWHERE / EXCLUDED: 10
NO CURRENT RIGHT PROVED: 2

SURVIVES — TITLE ONLY
---------------------
- Lordship/manorial title: accepted for project purposes as an incorporeal title.
It carries no automatic proof of land or substantive rights.

CAPABLE IN LAW BUT NOT PROVED FOR COLTS
---------------------------------------
- Mines/minerals; limestone/lime/clay/stone/gravel; pits/quarries; associated
entry/search/working powers; Watlington market franchise; limited roads/ways/
dykes/drains/protective-works incidents.
- Present result for every item: DO NOT CLAIM. The legal class may survive, but the
Colts right, exact property, benefit chain and (where applicable) priority are absent.

SURVIVAL/USE EVIDENCED ELSEWHERE, NOT AS A COLTS RIGHT
------------------------------------------------------
- Sporting and Warren/Sincks: a wider Hare/Stow/Forestry stream is real, but the
specific Colts benefit is not proved and the Forestry territory changed over time.
- Piscary, Shouldham market/fairs, tolls/stallage, two Shouldham fold liberties,
modern woodland access/wayleaves, mill, salthouse and superior Wormegay franchises:
the evidence belongs to other title/estate/manor streams unless an express later
recombination is proved.

EXTINGUISHED, TRANSFORMED OR FUNCTIONALLY ENDED
-----------------------------------------------
- 16s rent: historically evidenced, but its legal type and continuation are unproved;
if an ordinary manorial incident, it fell within the reform/compensation framework.
- One free fold and commons/wastes: old rights were transformed/extinguished through
enclosure; no Colts substitute allotment or continuing same right is identified.
- Court baron/customary court: historic institution, not a present feudal jurisdiction.
- Heriots, customary fines, reliefs, fealty, suit and copyhold admissions: historic only.
- Castleward and waytefee: historical superior-feudal burdens; no current Colts liability.

SEPARATED FROM THE LORDSHIP
---------------------------
- Colts Farm/manorial land: historic physical estate identity does not establish current
land ownership through the lordship.
- Advowson/patronage: historic Colts/Watlington evidence exists, but patronage followed
a separate stream and is not a present saleable incident of the manor title.

NO CURRENT RIGHT PROVED
-----------------------
- Timber and village-green control are not shown as Colts-specific present rights.

CONTROLLING LEGAL CHECK
-----------------------
- HMLR PG22: title, land and manorial rights are separate; a lordship may have no land
or rights. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/manors/practice-guide-22-manors
- HMLR PG66: lack of pre-13 October 2013 protection did not automatically extinguish a
valid right, but validity and priority against later registered purchasers must be
established. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013/practice-guide-66-overriding-interests-losing-automatic-protection-in-2013
- HMLR PG65: separate mineral title/custom/reservation proof is required.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/registration-of-mines-and-minerals-pg65/practice-guide-65-registration-of-mines-and-minerals
- Law of Property Act 1922: core reform/preservation framework.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1922/16/pdfs/ukpga_19220016_en.pdf

CLOSURE RULE
------------
Do not reopen this project for another broad catalogue, directory, newspaper,
place-name, geological or general-manor search.

Reopen a particular right only if an operative instrument is produced which:
1. identifies the right;
2. attributes it to Colts/Trussbutts rather than another estate/manor;
3. identifies the benefited and burdened property where required;
4. proves attachment or express reservation at the relevant severance;
5. proves the modern benefit chain; and
6. resolves current registered-title priority where applicable.

Until then the closed answer is:

THE LORDSHIP/TITLE SURVIVES.
NO SUBSTANTIVE CURRENT COLTS/TRUSSBUTTS RIGHT IS PROVED.

END PASS 27 — FINAL CLOSURE

Records & References

Sources and references mentioning this manor/title which are not necessarily conveyances or transfers.

925 records found.

Cambridge ArchiveSearch — Watlington Hall Estate sale particulars, forty-eight lots

Date / period: 4 Aug 1869 (current Cambridge indexed result); Pass 30 captured 29 Sep 1869 Type: University archive catalogue record for surviving sale particulars Reference: WCT-DIG-0270

Record ID: WCT-DIG-0270

Historical Date / Period: 4 Aug 1869 (current Cambridge indexed result); Pass 30 captured 29 Sep 1869

Evidence Scope: Critical exact retrieval target for Plestow-era Watlington Hall Estate sale

Record / Publication: Cambridge ArchiveSearch — Watlington Hall Estate sale particulars, forty-eight lots

Exact Manor / Name Form Found: Watlington Hall Estate, about six miles from Lynn, five from Downham Market and twenty from Ely, in forty-eight lots

People / Parties: Vendor/purchaser not established by indexed description

Place(s) Mentioned: Watlington, Norfolk; King's Lynn; Downham Market; Ely

What This Adds to Manor History: Cambridge ArchiveSearch indexes a surviving set of sale particulars specifically for the Watlington Hall Estate, divided into forty-eight lots. The current indexed result surfaces 4 August 1869, while Pass 30 captured 29 September 1869 for this exact target; both dates are retained pending direct inspection. The document remains the strongest exact retrieval target for the 1869 estate sale and may contain vendor, purchaser, lot-plan and manor-related particulars needed to test the claimed Plestow → Coote transfer.

Source Type: University archive catalogue record for surviving sale particulars

Primary / Secondary: Primary manuscript holding / official archival metadata

Direct Digital Copy Status: Exact public catalogue target; no scan of sale particulars verified

Direct Document URL: https://archivesearch.lib.cam.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/263086

Supporting / Discovery URL: https://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/Gateway/Results_Single.aspx?resourceID=1002&uid=MNF31972

Relevance: Very High

Verification: Pass 32 re-check: Cambridge ArchiveSearch's current indexed result for this exact archival object surfaces 1869-08-04; the catalogue page itself is access-restricted to the crawler. Norfolk Heritage Explorer independently confirms an 1869 estate-sale map.

Issues / Cautions: DATE CONTROL: Pass 30 stored 29 Sep 1869. The current Cambridge indexed result gives 4 Aug 1869. Both forms are retained pending direct inspection of the catalogue/document. The indexed description still does not name the purchaser or prove that the manor/lordship formed part of the sale.

Pass Added: 30

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Digital Records, original row 271.


[Conveyance Document Register 2026-08-30]
ID: EM-006
Date: 1869
Record: Sale particulars
Place / Manor: Watlington Hall Estate, 48 lots
Holder / Context: Plestow-era estate sale
Repository: Cambridge University Library Map Department
Reference: ArchiveSearch object
What It Shows: Actual catalogued sales-particulars item likely to state tenure, acreage, lots and conditions.
Directness: DIRECT SALE DOCUMENT
Digital Status: CATALOGUE HIT
Source URL: https://archivesearch.lib.cam.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/263073
Next Action: Request full scan including plans and manuscript purchaser annotations.
Caveat: Exact shelfmark to be confirmed by Cambridge.

Import note: Add 263073 as an additional external URL to the existing 1869 sale-particulars Manor Record. Preserve the existing 263086 URL; exact Cambridge object identity still requires archive confirmation.

BL/CS 4/57 — Plestow request for Watlington & Tottenhill court books

Date / period: 10 Aug 1779 Type: Stewardship/court-book custody letter Reference: BL/CS 4/57


[Conveyance Document Register 2026-08-30]
ID: LP-005
Date: 10 Aug 1779
Record Type: Stewardship/court-book custody letter
Person(s): Mr Plestow; Philip Case; Henry Bell
Manor / Property: Watlington and Tottenhill manors
Repository: Norfolk Record Office
Reference: BL/CS 4/57
Directness: DIRECT ADMINISTRATION
Verification: VERIFIED — OFFICIAL CATALOGUE
Why Relevant: Strong testimony of Plestow exercising manorial administration by 1779.
What Still Needed: Purchase deed from Hare and any abstract of title.
Source URL: https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/mr-plestow-watlington-hall-to-philip-case-asks-for-court-books-of-manors-of-watlington-and-tottenhill-as-he-declines-the-stewardship-with-list-of-court-books-receipted-by-henry-bell-10-aug-1779
Search Terms: Plestow Case Watlington court books 1779
Notes: Order annexed list too.

HARE 3083/2 — Bargain & sale: Robert Rich & Frances → William Battes

Date / period: 26 Nov 1611 Type: Bargain & sale Reference: Hare 3083/2


[Conveyance Document Register 2026-08-30]
ID: RD-005
Date: 26 Nov 1611
Reference: Hare 3083/2
Type: Bargain & sale
Parties: Robert Rich & Frances → William Battes
Property / Place: Shouldham Thorpe/Garboysthorpe, Foston, Russells
Repository: Norfolk Record Office
Relationship to Colts Chain: Genuine Rich-era conveyance; may recite Gawdy-derived title.
Verification: VERIFIED — OFFICIAL CATALOGUE
Risk of Misidentification: LOW
Source URL: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/4a8a576e-85b9-42a6-8ea7-b99900bbbd93
Next Action: Order full deed and inspect recitals.
Priority: CRITICAL
Notes: Actual surviving deed-level record.

7 Jun 1930 -> 18 Mar 2024 current-title control — Historic England places the modern Shouldham Village Hall on the eastern end of an approximately 87m x 25m enclosure in the field corresponding to the greater part of the >9-acre Batchelors close, later...

Date / period: 7 Jun 1930 -> 18 Mar 2024 current-title control Type: Land / estate event Reference: Historic England NHLE 1020446 + Charity Commission 304061 + Shouldham Parish Council minutes 18 Mar 2024 + NRO PD 356/129 locator

Date / Period: 7 Jun 1930 -> 18 Mar 2024 current-title control

Physical Land / Estate Event: Historic England places the modern Shouldham Village Hall on the eastern end of an approximately 87m x 25m enclosure in the field corresponding to the greater part of the >9-acre Batchelors close, later Further Homestall and within early-19C Colt's Farm. A Village Hall Trust Declaration is dated 7 Jun 1930.

Lordship / Title Event: No Watlington-Colts lordship transfer is stated in the Village Hall public records. The trust event occurs about four months after the 12 Feb 1930 Humphreys->Edleston lordship conveyance, but no connection between the two instruments is proved.

Rights Event: The 1930 declaration may concern land tenure/charitable use, but full terms are unread. Current Charity Commission data says the Trust owns/leases no land/property; 2024 Parish Council minutes show the Council sought the Governance Deed and Land Registry record to understand land ownership/lease.

Evidence / Record: Historic England NHLE 1020446 + Charity Commission 304061 + Shouldham Parish Council minutes 18 Mar 2024 + NRO PD 356/129 locator

What It Shows: First precise twentieth-century legal-instrument candidate attached to a physically identified historic Colts fragment. Modern public records still require the actual deed and HMLR record to explain the legal estate.

Colts Connection: Direct to Batchelors/Further Homestall eastern fragment; not evidence for the whole close.

Current Interpretation: [Inference] POTENTIAL VALID SEVERANCE / LEASE / TRUST EVENT, NOT YET PROVED. If the 1930 deed contains an operative grant/lease from the then physical-estate owner, it may close this fragment. If governance-only, ownership must be traced elsewhere. No ownerless or stolen-land finding.

Next Decisive Document: Full 7 Jun 1930 declaration/governance deed + NRO PD 356/129 + HMLR current/historic register and title plan.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 70.

Joan 15 Edw IV no.34 — supposed Norfolk return downgraded / non-blocking — Rogers' printed statement that no.34 included Norfolk is retained, but Walter Rye's dedicated Norfolk inquisition index includes real 15 Edw IV entries no.33/no.63 and does not ...

Date / period: Joan 15 Edw IV no.34 — supposed Norfolk return downgraded / non-blocking Type: Land / estate event Reference: Rogers 1879; Walter Rye, Norfolk Records vol. II (1892); C140/VCH citation controls.

Date / Period: Joan 15 Edw IV no.34 — supposed Norfolk return downgraded / non-blocking

Physical Land / Estate Event: Rogers' printed statement that no.34 included Norfolk is retained, but Walter Rye's dedicated Norfolk inquisition index includes real 15 Edw IV entries no.33/no.63 and does not expose no.34, Parr/Parre, Colt or Trusbut.

Lordship / Title Event: No new person; Joan/Parr/Colt names are source-control targets only.

Rights Event: No Norfolk parcel is now inferred from Joan no.34.

Evidence / Record: Rogers 1879; Walter Rye, Norfolk Records vol. II (1892); C140/VCH citation controls.

What It Shows: [Inference] The evidence now leans against treating Joan no.34 as a Norfolk county return. The direct Trusbut->Colt inheritance is independently evidenced through Parkin/Historic England, so the Joan-IPM Norfolk theory is no longer required.

Colts Connection: No modern parcel consequence.

Current Interpretation: FALSE-LEAD CONTROL — MISSING JOAN NORFOLK RETURN NO LONGER A REQUIRED LINK; C140 RETAINED FOR SOURCE CLEANUP ONLY.

Next Decisive Document: Check actual C140 item only to resolve /13 versus /34 and Rogers' error; do not keep the title chain open pending a hypothetical Norfolk return.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 68.

1427 Trusbut fee -> 1451 Thomas Trussbut will -> John/William -> Jane heiress -> Thomas Colt — 1427 primary-derived IPM places Thomas Trusbut and parceners on a one-fee Watlington/Tottenhill/Garbodesthorp/Setchey/?Longham block. Parkin's 1451 will acco...

Date / period: 1427 Trusbut fee -> 1451 Thomas Trussbut will -> John/William -> Jane heiress -> Thomas Colt Type: Land / estate event Reference: E-CIPM 22-799; Parkin/Blomefield vol. VII; Historic England List Entry 1020446; probate target Register Aleyn fol.163.

Date / Period: 1427 Trusbut fee -> 1451 Thomas Trussbut will -> John/William -> Jane heiress -> Thomas Colt

Physical Land / Estate Event: 1427 primary-derived IPM places Thomas Trusbut and parceners on a one-fee Watlington/Tottenhill/Garbodesthorp/Setchey/?Longham block. Parkin's 1451 will account then gives Thomas's Tittleshall lordship plus lands/foldcourses in Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey and adjacent places to son John, with Shouldham/Marham lands to William. Parkin's Shouldham descent says William died s.p., so the manor came to Jane, daughter/heir of elder brother John, who married Thomas Colt.

Lordship / Title Event: Thomas Trusbut; John Trusbut; William Trusbut; Jane/Joan Trusbut; Thomas Colt; John Colt.

Rights Event: Watlington; Tottenhill; Setchey; Garbodesthorp/Shouldham-Thorpe context; Tittleshall/Holme; Shouldham; Thorpland; Fincham.

Evidence / Record: E-CIPM 22-799; Parkin/Blomefield vol. VII; Historic England List Entry 1020446; probate target Register Aleyn fol.163.

What It Shows: [Inference] The exact 1427 fee parcels are not proved identical parcel-for-parcel with the 1451 testamentary estate, but the same holder plus overlapping Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey geography and the explicit Thomas->John/Jane->Colt succession materially closes the medieval transmission route.

Colts Connection: Very high title-identity significance; no modern parcel survival conclusion by itself.

Current Interpretation: MEDIEVAL TRUSBUT -> COLT TITLE/HEIRESS BRIDGE CLOSED AT PRIMARY-DERIVED LEVEL; ORIGINAL WILL STILL REQUIRED FOR MANUSCRIPT-LEVEL PROOF.

Next Decisive Document: Retrieve Aleyn fol.163 -> compare exact will wording with 1427 fee -> then use 1597 HARE 2402 premises to crosswalk surviving Tudor estate geography.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 67.

15 Edw IV no.34 -> [Inference] leading exact modern item C 140/52/34 + early archive-index routes — Pass 85 adds no physical-land transfer. The gain is source control: CIPM XXV explicitly shows that an old Calendarium item number is retained as the fin...

Date / period: 15 Edw IV no.34 -> [Inference] leading exact modern item C 140/52/34 + early archive-index routes Type: Land / estate event Reference: CIPM New Series XXV editorial introduction; VCH Roydon/Barking; Mapping the Medieval Countryside Chancery-archive history.

Date / Period: 15 Edw IV no.34 -> [Inference] leading exact modern item C 140/52/34 + early archive-index routes

Physical Land / Estate Event: Pass 85 adds no physical-land transfer. The gain is source control: CIPM XXV explicitly shows that an old Calendarium item number is retained as the final number in the modern C-series reference (16 Hen VI no.35 -> C 139/86/35). With Joan independently fixed to C 140/52, no.34, [Inference] C 140/52/34 is now the leading exact item. Separate early inventories at Trinity College Oxford MSS 61–62 and Bodleian Rawlinson B.231 add independent archive-index routes.

Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut-Colt-Parr; Sir William Parr; John Colt; John Tymperley junior only as existing target identifiers — no new person.

Rights Event: No new Norfolk property name. Existing five named non-Norfolk estate contexts remain unchanged; exact Norfolk return remains missing.

Evidence / Record: CIPM New Series XXV editorial introduction; VCH Roydon/Barking; Mapping the Medieval Countryside Chancery-archive history.

What It Shows: The modern item target is materially narrowed and the search now includes pre-modern archive inventories plus E 501/15–18. This improves retrieval precision without asserting any new severance or ownership event.

Colts Connection: Very high title-identity/recovery relevance; no direct modern parcel consequence until the Norfolk land schedule is recovered.

Current Interpretation: SOURCE-CONTROL UPGRADE — C 140/52/34 LEADING EXACT MAPPING [INFERENCE]; /13 CONFLICT RETAINED; EARLY INVENTORIES ADDED.

Next Decisive Document: Check/request C 140/52/34 and ask TNA to resolve /13 -> E 501/15–18 -> Trinity MSS 61–62 -> Rawlinson B.231 -> then E149/E152/E153/E136/E357 as needed.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 66.

Edward-IV Joan IPM recovery strategy — Pass 84 archive-survival expansion — No new physical-land event is asserted. Pass 84 concerns survival/retrieval of the missing Norfolk county return and its evidence trail.

Date / period: Edward-IV Joan IPM recovery strategy — Pass 84 archive-survival expansion Type: Land / estate event Reference: CIPM New Series XXVI editorial conventions; TNA IPM research guide; Mapping the Medieval Countryside E-CIPM 25-400/401 and reference table.

Date / Period: Edward-IV Joan IPM recovery strategy — Pass 84 archive-survival expansion

Physical Land / Estate Event: No new physical-land event is asserted. Pass 84 concerns survival/retrieval of the missing Norfolk county return and its evidence trail.

Lordship / Title Event: No change to the Joan -> John Colt inheritance conclusion. C 140/52 remains the safe Chancery piece-level target; exact constituent item is unresolved.

Rights Event: No new manorial right is asserted.

Evidence / Record: CIPM New Series XXVI editorial conventions; TNA IPM research guide; Mapping the Medieval Countryside E-CIPM 25-400/401 and reference table.

What It Shows: The retrieval ladder must now include E 152 enrolments, E 153 residual escheators' files, and E 136/E 357 account material in addition to C 140 and E 149. A concrete 1440 Norfolk/Suffolk packet shows one joint writ producing two county inquisitions while only the Suffolk return has a listed E149 duplicate.

Colts Connection: Indirect but very high identity significance: a negative E149 Norfolk search would not prove that no Norfolk return existed or survives elsewhere.

Current Interpretation: ARCHIVAL-SURVIVAL CONTROL UPGRADE — SEARCH EACH RECORD CLASS AND COUNTY RETURN INDEPENDENTLY; DO NOT EQUATE MISSING E149 DUPLICATE WITH MISSING NORFOLK IPM.

Next Decisive Document: C 140/52 all constituents -> E 149 -> E 152 -> E 153 -> E 136/E 357; use Joan Parre + John Tymperley junior + Norfolk/Suffolk + 15 Edw IV.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 65.

15 Edw IV assignment -> 28 Jan 17 Edw IV enforcement writ (Ch./MS. Ch. Norfolk 339) — Pass 83 corrects the Bodleian target to Ch./MS. Ch. Norfolk 339. Edward IV's writ to the sheriff of London and Middlesex names John Tymperley junior as escheator of N...

Date / period: 15 Edw IV assignment -> 28 Jan 17 Edw IV enforcement writ (Ch./MS. Ch. Norfolk 339) Type: Land / estate event Reference: Bodleian Calendar of Charters and Rolls (1878), Ch.339; current Bodleian catalogue MS. Ch. Norfolk 339; VCH Essex Roydon; CIPM editorial two-county procedure control.

Date / Period: 15 Edw IV assignment -> 28 Jan 17 Edw IV enforcement writ (Ch./MS. Ch. Norfolk 339)

Physical Land / Estate Event: Pass 83 corrects the Bodleian target to Ch./MS. Ch. Norfolk 339. Edward IV's writ to the sheriff of London and Middlesex names John Tymperley junior as escheator of Norfolk and Suffolk and says he had been assigned in 15 Edw IV to take Joan's inquisition. VCH Roydon independently fixes the Chancery retrieval form as C 140/52, no.34; Pass-82 /13 is now treated as an unresolved sub-item/citation form rather than the final whole-packet reference.

Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut-Colt-Parr; Sir William Parr; John Tymperley junior; John Colt/Colte.

Rights Event: No Norfolk manor is named by the writ. The new value is procedural: Joan's post-mortem inquiry was explicitly assigned to the joint Norfolk/Suffolk escheator.

Evidence / Record: Bodleian Calendar of Charters and Rolls (1878), Ch.339; current Bodleian catalogue MS. Ch. Norfolk 339; VCH Essex Roydon; CIPM editorial two-county procedure control.

What It Shows: [Inference] A joint Norfolk/Suffolk assignment is compatible with separate county inquisitions and uneven survival; this materially strengthens the search for a missing Norfolk return but does not prove that such a return survives.

Colts Connection: No Watlington/Shouldham/Shingham/Holme/Runcton Holme parcel is named. C 140/52 sub-item numbering remains unresolved; do not promote /13 or /34 as a modern item number without TNA confirmation.

Current Interpretation: PRIMARY-DERIVED NORFOLK/SUFFOLK IPM PROCESS NOW PROVED — EXACT NORFOLK LAND LIST STILL MISSING.

Next Decisive Document: Order/retrieve MS. Ch. Norfolk 339; request TNA C 140/52 material for Joan wife of William Parre / old 15 Edw IV no.34; search E149 by Joan + John Tymperley; extract county returns separately.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 64.

15 Edw IV no.34 -> VCH source-specific C 140/52/13 citation -> five known estate contexts; 28 Jan 1478 Bodleian writ — Joan's same numbered IPM is now explicitly tied in published record-based sources to Cavendish/Colt's Hall, Clayhall, Suffolks, Boxst...

Date / period: 15 Edw IV no.34 -> VCH source-specific C 140/52/13 citation -> five known estate contexts; 28 Jan 1478 Bodleian writ Type: Land / estate event Reference: VCH Essex/Barking; Copinger County of Suffolk; Copinger Manors of Suffolk; existing Copinger/Lysons/Robinson/Rogers; Bodleian Charters Catalogue.

Date / Period: 15 Edw IV no.34 -> VCH source-specific C 140/52/13 citation -> five known estate contexts; 28 Jan 1478 Bodleian writ

Physical Land / Estate Event: Joan's same numbered IPM is now explicitly tied in published record-based sources to Cavendish/Colt's Hall, Clayhall, Suffolks, Boxstead Manor and 'Peytones'/Peyton Hall. VCH additionally supplies C 140/52/13 for the Clayhall/Joan passage. Bodleian MS. Ch. Norfolk 339 [corrected Pass 83] preserves a later 28 Jan 1478 commission/writ to take an inquisition of Joan's lands.

Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut Colt Parr; Sir William Parr; John Colt/Colte; Thomas Colt.

Rights Event: Inheritance/IPM packet across Suffolk, Essex and Middlesex; Rogers separately states the fifteenth-year inquisition also included Norfolk, Berkshire and the other counties. Exact Norfolk places remain unknown.

Evidence / Record: VCH Essex/Barking; Copinger County of Suffolk; Copinger Manors of Suffolk; existing Copinger/Lysons/Robinson/Rogers; Bodleian Charters Catalogue.

What It Shows: The old-reference bottleneck is materially reduced: a precise modern Chancery target now exists and two further Suffolk manor contexts are tied to the same IPM number. The original C140/E149 content still controls.

Colts Connection: Very high heiress/title-identity relevance. No new Norfolk/Watlington parcel is claimed from Boxstead or Peyton; the Bodleian collection label is not treated as land-location proof.

Current Interpretation: MAJOR IPM RECONSTRUCTION UPGRADE — C 140/52 IS SAFE MODERN PIECE; /13 REMAINS UNRESOLVED; FIVE KNOWN ESTATE CONTEXTS; NORFOLK PLACE LIST STILL MISSING.

Next Decisive Document: Obtain/read all C 140/52 constituent returns/items for Joan (including source-cited /13, status unresolved) -> compare Calendarium 15 Edw IV no.34 -> E149/E152 counterparts -> extract every Norfolk property -> inspect MS. Ch. Norfolk 339 -> then search John Colt C66 livery.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 63.

Late 15th-century heiress seat — source ladder: NORFOLK -> SHINGHAM / HOLME / RUNCTON HOLME — The 1561 Suffolk visitation gives only a Norfolk Trusbut heiress. Gough's much earlier monumental account names father John Trusbut of Shingham. A separate mo...

Date / period: Late 15th-century heiress seat — source ladder: NORFOLK -> SHINGHAM / HOLME / RUNCTON HOLME Type: Land / estate event Reference: Harvey Suffolk Visitation 1561; Gough; Powys-Lybbe; BP2003-derived ThePeerage.

Date / Period: Late 15th-century heiress seat — source ladder: NORFOLK -> SHINGHAM / HOLME / RUNCTON HOLME

Physical Land / Estate Event: The 1561 Suffolk visitation gives only a Norfolk Trusbut heiress. Gough's much earlier monumental account names father John Trusbut of Shingham. A separate modern pedigree says John 'of Holme, Norfolk'. BP2003-derived sites expand the seat to Runcton Holme.

Lordship / Title Event: John Trusbut; Joan/Jane Trusbut; Thomas Colt; Sir William Parr.

Rights Event: Competing seat descriptions: generic Norfolk; Shingham; Holme; Runcton Holme. No primary estate schedule yet attaches Joan to a particular one.

Evidence / Record: Harvey Suffolk Visitation 1561; Gough; Powys-Lybbe; BP2003-derived ThePeerage.

What It Shows: Pass 81 shows the modern evidence is not one uniform Runcton tradition. 'Holme' exists as a less specific intermediate form, making editorial/source expansion a live possibility. Gough's Shingham remains the earliest specific seat found.

Colts Connection: No claim-specific source is exposed for Powys-Lybbe's Holme wording; Gough is antiquarian; BP2003 derivative is modern. Do not merge places or select a seat.

Current Interpretation: SEAT CONFLICT REFINED — GENERIC NORFOLK / SHINGHAM / HOLME / RUNCTON HOLME ALL KEPT DISTINCT.

Next Decisive Document: Joan Norfolk IPM return; John/Thomas Trusbut wills; Shingham records; Runcton MR4/6; Harley MS1177 and other visitation copies.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 62.

15 Edw IV inquisition — Rogers NORFOLK wording visually verified; exact manor names missing — Pass 81 visually inspected the original printed Rogers pages. The page itself states that Johanna's fifteenth-year inquisition contained an extensive list of ...

Date / period: 15 Edw IV inquisition — Rogers NORFOLK wording visually verified; exact manor names missing Type: Land / estate event Reference: Rogers 1879 direct scanned page; Copinger; Lysons; Robinson; TNA C140/E149/Calendarium route.

Date / Period: 15 Edw IV inquisition — Rogers NORFOLK wording visually verified; exact manor names missing

Physical Land / Estate Event: Pass 81 visually inspected the original printed Rogers pages. The page itself states that Johanna's fifteenth-year inquisition contained an extensive list of possessions in Berkshire, Middlesex, Norfolk, Essex and Suffolk. The printed footnote itself says 'Cal. Inquis. post mortem, Richard II., p.72', proving the source defect is not OCR.

Lordship / Title Event: Joan/Johanna Trusbut Colt Parr; John Colt.

Rights Event: Norfolk property is explicitly reported by Rogers at county level; no exact Norfolk manor/lands extracted. Known other estate contexts remain Cavendish, Clayhall and Suffolks.

Evidence / Record: Rogers 1879 direct scanned page; Copinger; Lysons; Robinson; TNA C140/E149/Calendarium route.

What It Shows: The evidential status is clearer: the Norfolk assertion is certainly Rogers' printed statement, while its printed citation is demonstrably anomalous. This strengthens the statement-as-source but not the unidentified underlying medieval record.

Colts Connection: No exact Norfolk place. Do not repair the Richard-II citation by assumption. Rogers' separate Materials Henry VII p127 pointer has now been identified as Thomas Colt/Roger Thorpe litigation, not John Colt livery.

Current Interpretation: NORFOLK STATEMENT VISUALLY VERIFIED — UNDERLYING IPM LAND LIST STILL THE DECISIVE TARGET.

Next Decisive Document: Calendarium 15 Edw IV no.34 -> C140/E149 -> all Norfolk places; keep John Colt livery search in C66/Patent Rolls.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 61.

Joan d. probable 4 Aug 1473 -> IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 -> three known estate contexts — The exact Joan IPM reference is now independently tied to three property contexts: Cavendish/Colt's Hall succession (Copinger), Clayhall in Barking descending to John C...

Date / period: Joan d. probable 4 Aug 1473 -> IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 -> three known estate contexts Type: Land / estate event Reference: Copinger; Lysons; Robinson; all independently citing 15 Edw IV no.34. TNA method points to C140/E149 and Calendarium IV.

Date / Period: Joan d. probable 4 Aug 1473 -> IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 -> three known estate contexts

Physical Land / Estate Event: The exact Joan IPM reference is now independently tied to three property contexts: Cavendish/Colt's Hall succession (Copinger), Clayhall in Barking descending to John Colte (Lysons), and the Manor of Suffolks in Enfield inherited by John Colt (Robinson). Robinson's family narrative is corrupted, but his property paragraph explicitly cites the same Esch. 15 Edw IV no.34.

Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut Colt Parr; John Colt; Thomas Colt; Sir William Parr.

Rights Event: Known contexts: Cavendish/Colt's Hall, Suffolk; Clayhall, Barking, Essex; Suffolks, Enfield, Middlesex. Norfolk holdings remain unknown.

Evidence / Record: Copinger; Lysons; Robinson; all independently citing 15 Edw IV no.34. TNA method points to C140/E149 and Calendarium IV.

What It Shows: Three separate estate contexts using the same numbered IPM make a multi-county/multi-property return highly plausible. [Inference] A full C140/E149 extraction has a realistic chance of exposing additional Norfolk estates if Joan held them.

Colts Connection: Robinson misstates marriage order/husband/date. No Norfolk holding is yet found. The original return controls.

Current Interpretation: THREE-ESTATE JOAN IPM RECONSTRUCTION — ORIGINAL C140/E149 NOW CRITICAL.

Next Decisive Document: Read Calendarium IV 15 Edw IV no.34 -> map to C140 modern file/item -> check E149 counterpart -> extract all counties/properties -> then C66 livery for John Colt.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 60.

4 Aug 1473 [reconstructed] -> 15 Edw IV IPM -> John Colt — Copinger's death formula resolves to 4 Aug 1473 and says Cavendish passed to son/heir John. Lysons independently cites the same 15 Edw IV no.34 escheat/IPM for Joan dying seised of the Manor of...

Date / period: 4 Aug 1473 [reconstructed] -> 15 Edw IV IPM -> John Colt Type: Land / estate event Reference: Copinger, Manors of Suffolk; Lysons, Environs of London; DNB chronology control.

Date / Period: 4 Aug 1473 [reconstructed] -> 15 Edw IV IPM -> John Colt

Physical Land / Estate Event: Copinger's death formula resolves to 4 Aug 1473 and says Cavendish passed to son/heir John. Lysons independently cites the same 15 Edw IV no.34 escheat/IPM for Joan dying seised of the Manor of Clayhall in Barking and its descent to John Colte. Thus the Joan IPM trail now demonstrably touches at least a Suffolk succession context and an Essex manor.

Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut Colt Parr; Thomas Colt; Sir William Parr; John Colt/Colte.

Rights Event: Known estate points: Cavendish/Colt's Hall succession context; Manor of Clayhall, Barking. Norfolk Trusbut estate still unknown.

Evidence / Record: Copinger, Manors of Suffolk; Lysons, Environs of London; DNB chronology control.

What It Shows: The same IPM number appearing independently for different estates sharply increases the likelihood that the original return contains a broader multi-property schedule. [Inference] This makes a county-by-county search of the IPM more promising than livery searching alone.

Colts Connection: Clayhall is not proved Trusbut-derived. Copinger may cite the IPM for heir/death rather than every Cavendish detail. Original IPM still controls.

Current Interpretation: MULTI-ESTATE JOAN IPM TRAIL — FIRST NON-CAVENDISH MANOR RECOVERED; NORFOLK CONTENT UNKNOWN.

Next Decisive Document: Locate C 140 modern shelfmark for 15 Edw IV no.34; search county histories for additional properties; trace Clayhall pre-Joan title; then compare any Norfolk entries with Trusbut fee geography.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 59.

13 Edw IV death -> 15 Edw IV IPM -> 1 Hen VII wardship / reported 5 Nov 1485 livery — Joan dies, John succeeds as heir in known estate contexts, and John is later described as Parr's ward in 1 Hen VII. Modern BP2003 material reports livery 5 Nov 1485. ...

Date / period: 13 Edw IV death -> 15 Edw IV IPM -> 1 Hen VII wardship / reported 5 Nov 1485 livery Type: Land / estate event Reference: Copinger; Lysons; Robinson; BP2003 derivative; TNA IPM research guide.

Date / Period: 13 Edw IV death -> 15 Edw IV IPM -> 1 Hen VII wardship / reported 5 Nov 1485 livery

Physical Land / Estate Event: Joan dies, John succeeds as heir in known estate contexts, and John is later described as Parr's ward in 1 Hen VII. Modern BP2003 material reports livery 5 Nov 1485. Pass 79 adds official TNA method: post-IPM livery and wardship records can often be found in Patent Rolls C66; this should now be searched before treating Fine Rolls as the only route.

Lordship / Title Event: Joan Trusbut Colt Parr; Sir William Parr; John Colt.

Rights Event: Known inherited estate hooks now include Cavendish, Clayhall and Suffolks; property released by livery remains unknown.

Evidence / Record: Copinger; Lysons; Robinson; BP2003 derivative; TNA IPM research guide.

What It Shows: [Inference] The known estate names should materially improve Patent Roll searching for John Colt around 5 Nov 1485.

Colts Connection: No primary livery entry found. Date remains secondary. Do not infer Norfolk land without record text.

Current Interpretation: LIVERY SEARCH ROUTE CORRECTED — PRIORITISE C66 PATENT ROLLS.

Next Decisive Document: Search CPR Henry VII 1485-1494 and C66 around 5 Nov 1485 using John Colt/Colte + Clayhall/Cavendish/Suffolks; then county escheator returns.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 58.

Trusbut heiress -> Thomas Colt -> Joan d. probable 4 Aug 1473 -> IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 -> John heir/ward — Visitation proves Jane/Joan as Norfolk Trusbut heiress married Thomas Colt and John as son/heir. Copinger gives probable death 4 Aug 1473 and exact...

Date / period: Trusbut heiress -> Thomas Colt -> Joan d. probable 4 Aug 1473 -> IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 -> John heir/ward Type: Land / estate event Reference: Harvey Visitation; DNB; Copinger; Lysons.

Date / Period: Trusbut heiress -> Thomas Colt -> Joan d. probable 4 Aug 1473 -> IPM 15 Edw IV no.34 -> John heir/ward

Physical Land / Estate Event: Visitation proves Jane/Joan as Norfolk Trusbut heiress married Thomas Colt and John as son/heir. Copinger gives probable death 4 Aug 1473 and exact IPM reference 15 Edw IV no.34. Pass 78 adds Lysons' use of that same IPM for Joan's seisin of Clayhall, Barking, descending to John, showing the IPM trail covers substantive estate property beyond the Cavendish narrative.

Lordship / Title Event: Jane/Joan Trusbut; Thomas Colt; Sir William Parr; John Colt.

Rights Event: Known inherited/succession contexts now include Cavendish and Clayhall. Exact Norfolk Trusbut estate remains missing.

Evidence / Record: Harvey Visitation; DNB; Copinger; Lysons.

What It Shows: The legal chain is increasingly concrete. The original IPM could now plausibly resolve whether John inherited Norfolk Trusbut property alongside Suffolk/Essex holdings.

Colts Connection: Clayhall origin is unproved; do not label it Trusbut property. Original IPM/livery not yet recovered.

Current Interpretation: VERY HIGH HEIRESS/IPM BRIDGE — ACTUAL SECOND MANOR NOW IDENTIFIED, NORFOLK SCHEDULE STILL MISSING.

Next Decisive Document: Original IPM/C140 -> all county returns -> 5 Nov 1485 livery -> compare Norfolk entries to 1403/1427 fee and 1597 Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 57.

1 Hen V (1413-14) -> by Easter 1418 -> 1597 comparison — Christ's College MR7 item 53(1) describes a 60-year Bromehill Priory lease to Laurence ?Trussebut [Gressebut] of all lands, tenements, rents and tithes in Runcton Holme, annual rent 20s, with cat...

Date / period: 1 Hen V (1413-14) -> by Easter 1418 -> 1597 comparison Type: Land / estate event Reference: Christ's College Muniments Inventory MR7 item 53(1); HARE 2402/2403 1597 catalogue evidence.

Date / Period: 1 Hen V (1413-14) -> by Easter 1418 -> 1597 comparison

Physical Land / Estate Event: Christ's College MR7 item 53(1) describes a 60-year Bromehill Priory lease to Laurence ?Trussebut [Gressebut] of all lands, tenements, rents and tithes in Runcton Holme, annual rent 20s, with catalogue total about 4a 3r 20p. Lawrence is dead by Easter 1418. In 1597 the Colt estate sale expressly includes Colt lands/tenements in Runcton Holme alongside Watlington Coltes/Trusbuttes.

Lordship / Title Event: Laurence ?Trussebut; Bromehill Priory; much later George Colt/Thomas Shouldham estate parties.

Rights Event: 1413-14 leased Runcton property; exact parcels unnamed/partially illegible in catalogue. 1597 Colt Runcton-Holme lands are separately documented but no parcel equation is proved.

Evidence / Record: Christ's College Muniments Inventory MR7 item 53(1); HARE 2402/2403 1597 catalogue evidence.

What It Shows: [Inference] Runcton Holme is now a direct locality-continuity marker on both the early Lawrence-era Trusbut side and the later Colt estate side. This materially strengthens the route to test physical continuity, especially if the original lease yields parcel names.

Colts Connection: Catalogue surname is queried; lease is not a manor; 1413 parcels are not yet shown to be the 1597 Colt parcels. Runcton also contained distinct manorial interests.

Current Interpretation: DIRECT EARLY RUNCTON-HOLME LAND BRIDGE — LOCALITY CONTINUITY STRONG, PARCEL CONTINUITY UNPROVED.

Next Decisive Document: Obtain original MR7 item 53(1); inspect MR4,6 Runcton rolls/rental; compare parcel/tenant names with HARE 2493, 1597 HARE2402 and later estate maps.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 56.

4 Jul 1403 -> by Easter 1418 -> 4 May 1427 — 1403: Lawrence Trussebute and others hold one knight's fee across Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, Shouldham Thorpe and Langham, plus a separate Watlington quarter-fee. Modern archival scholarship places Law...

Date / period: 4 Jul 1403 -> by Easter 1418 -> 4 May 1427 Type: Land / estate event Reference: E-CIPM 18-793 / C 137/37/39 mm.9-10 / E 149/81/3 m.3; Maddock archival synthesis; E-CIPM 22-799 / C 139/30/56 mm.13,15.

Date / Period: 4 Jul 1403 -> by Easter 1418 -> 4 May 1427

Physical Land / Estate Event: 1403: Lawrence Trussebute and others hold one knight's fee across Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, Shouldham Thorpe and Langham, plus a separate Watlington quarter-fee. Modern archival scholarship places Lawrence's death by Easter 1418. 1427: Thomas Trusbut and parceners hold one knight's fee across Watlington, Tottenhill, Garbodesthorp, Setchey and ?Longham.

Lordship / Title Event: Lawrence Trussebute; Thomas Trusbut and parceners.

Rights Event: One-fee Trusbut block with exact Watlington/Tottenhill/Setchey overlap; probable Shouldham Thorpe/Garbodesthorp alias continuity; fifth place unresolved. Lawrence also had a separate Watlington quarter-fee in 1403.

Evidence / Record: E-CIPM 18-793 / C 137/37/39 mm.9-10 / E 149/81/3 m.3; Maddock archival synthesis; E-CIPM 22-799 / C 139/30/56 mm.13,15.

What It Shows: [Inference] Same fee quantity, same Trusbut surname and highly overlapping locality-set strongly indicate continuity of the feudal fee block from Lawrence's generation to Thomas's by 1427. The transition window is now approximately 1418-1427.

Colts Connection: No source yet states Thomas's relationship to Lawrence, the legal transfer, or that 1403 Langham = 1427 ?Longham. No automatic identity with later Colts/Trusbuttes manor.

Current Interpretation: VERY HIGH TRUSBUT CONTINUITY ANCHOR — FEE BLOCK STRONGLY CONTINUOUS, HOLDER DESCENT STILL UNPROVED.

Next Decisive Document: Find Lawrence probate/death instrument; Thomas parentage/heirship; inspect HARE 2683-4 and HARE 2493; resolve Garbodesthorp and Langham/Longham; push fee block forward to 1451/Colt transition.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 55.

1467 -> 5 Oct 1474 -> 1494/1496 — Thomas Shuldham's 1467 testamentary summary grouped Watlington, Shouldham and Burnham Deepdale as life interests for widow Margaret. By 5 Oct 1474 a charter transcription shows Margaret, now widow of Thomas Shuldham se...

Date / period: 1467 -> 5 Oct 1474 -> 1494/1496 Type: Land / estate event Reference: Norfolk Archaeology VI Shuldham will summary; 1474 charter derivative transcription; Fincham compilation; NRO Hare 2026 193 x 5 official IPM metadata.

Date / Period: 1467 -> 5 Oct 1474 -> 1494/1496

Physical Land / Estate Event: Thomas Shuldham's 1467 testamentary summary grouped Watlington, Shouldham and Burnham Deepdale as life interests for widow Margaret. By 5 Oct 1474 a charter transcription shows Margaret, now widow of Thomas Shuldham senior, receiving a life annuity of 8 marks 6s.8d. charged on the manor of Depdale called Holkhammes from John Fyncham and feoffees. Fincham material says John purchased Burnham Deepdale in 1474; his 1494 will names his manor of Depdale and the official 1496 IPM confirms a manor in Depdale and Brankastir.

Lordship / Title Event: Thomas Shuldham senior; Margaret Shuldham; John Fyncham and feoffees.

Rights Event: Burnham Deepdale/Depdale manor; Margaret's prior life interest; 1474 annual rent/annuity with distraint. Watlington and Shouldham disposition after this event not shown.

Evidence / Record: Norfolk Archaeology VI Shuldham will summary; 1474 charter derivative transcription; Fincham compilation; NRO Hare 2026 193 x 5 official IPM metadata.

What It Shows: [Inference] This is the strongest current indication that Thomas Shuldham's grouped three-manor estate was being fragmented by 1474: Deepdale appears under Fyncham control while Margaret's economic interest is preserved as an annuity. It may represent purchase plus commutation/protection of her life estate.

Colts Connection: The operative 1474 purchase/conveyance is missing. Do not state Margaret sold Deepdale, released her entire life estate, or that Watlington/Shouldham passed with Deepdale.

Current Interpretation: PROBABLE DEEPDALE SEVERANCE/RESTRUCTURING FROM SHULDHAM GROUP — OPERATIVE DEED NOT YET RECOVERED.

Next Decisive Document: Recover original 1474 annuity charter and purchase deed; compare Thomas Shuldham 1467 will; determine what happened separately to Watlington and Shouldham after Deepdale left the group.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 54.

17 Ric II (1393-94) -> 4 Jul 1403 — Secondary Fincham pedigree evidence cites a 17 Ric II marriage settlement for Alicia Fyncham and Laurence Trusbutt of Shouldham. Ten years later a royal IPM fee schedule directly records Lawrence Trussebute holding a...

Date / period: 17 Ric II (1393-94) -> 4 Jul 1403 Type: Land / estate event Reference: Fyncham compilation citing Marr. Sett. 17 Ric II; E-CIPM 18-793 / TNA C 137/37/39 mm.9-10; E 149/81/3 m.3.

Date / Period: 17 Ric II (1393-94) -> 4 Jul 1403

Physical Land / Estate Event: Secondary Fincham pedigree evidence cites a 17 Ric II marriage settlement for Alicia Fyncham and Laurence Trusbutt of Shouldham. Ten years later a royal IPM fee schedule directly records Lawrence Trussebute holding a separate Watlington quarter-fee and a larger one-fee block across Watlington, Tottenhill, Setchey, Shouldham Thorpe and Langham; the same schedule separately records John de Fyncham holding a Foston/Shouldham Thorpe quarter-fee and a Fincham/West Dereham/Roxham/Fordham fee.

Lordship / Title Event: Alicia Fyncham; Laurence/Lawrence Trusbutt/Trussebute; John de Fyncham.

Rights Event: Trusbut: Watlington 1/4 fee plus one-fee multi-place block. Fyncham: Foston/Shouldham Thorpe 1/4 fee plus Fincham/West Dereham/Roxham/Fordham fee. Marriage property schedule unknown.

Evidence / Record: Fyncham compilation citing Marr. Sett. 17 Ric II; E-CIPM 18-793 / TNA C 137/37/39 mm.9-10; E 149/81/3 m.3.

What It Shows: Pass 74 places a Fyncham-Trusbut marriage immediately before primary proof of Laurence's Watlington tenure and alongside a separate Fyncham Shouldham-Thorpe fee. [Inference] The marriage may be relevant to local property consolidation, but there is no evidence yet that Alicia brought the Watlington fee or that the Fyncham fee became Trusbut property.

Colts Connection: Original marriage settlement missing. The 1403 fee schedule expressly distinguishes the fee entries and gives no acquisition mechanism.

Current Interpretation: DIRECT TRUSBUT WATLINGTON TENURE + TIGHT FINCHAM MARRIAGE NETWORK — TITLE MECHANISM UNPROVED.

Next Decisive Document: Recover 17 Ric II marriage settlement; trace Laurence's 1403 full fee and quarter-fee backward/forward; trace John Fyncham's Shouldham-Thorpe quarter-fee separately; compare later Trusbut/Shouldham deeds.

Imported from Pass 111 worksheet Land Severance Timeline, original row 53.

Conveyance & Descent

Title route through the present holder's bloodline

  1. Hon Jean West — grandparent line: 60.7% (34 mapped holder entries)
  2. Captain Derek Stanley West, Esq — grandparent line: 32.1% (18 mapped holder entries)
  3. Brenda Patricia Bedding — grandparent line: 7.1% (4 mapped holder entries)

Calculated from 56 of 60 conveyance/descent entries that have a usable saved blood relationship path. Entries without a blood path are not assigned to a grandparent branch. The present-holder endpoint is recognised automatically and excluded from this historical branch denominator. Heir Apparent entries are future holders and are also excluded from the historical denominator.

First holder to present holder: blood proximity & distance travelled

First recorded holder: Ailid / Æthelgyth

Present holder: William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk

Recorded title journey: 61 holder entries in this manor's saved Conveyance & Descent history.

Predominantly collateral blood relationship

Direct blood descent6.9%
4 mapped historical holder entries
Collateral blood89.7%
52 mapped historical holder entries
Marriage-linked blood route3.4%
2 mapped historical holder entries

Calculated from 58 of 60 recorded holder entries with a usable saved blood-connected route to the present holder. A marriage-linked blood route contains one or more spouse bridges but also a usable blood/collateral section; it is no longer discarded as wholly in-law. Pure in-law, unclassified and unmapped entries are excluded. The present-holder endpoint is recognised automatically as Self / 0 steps and excluded from the historical percentage denominator so it cannot skew the route. Heir Apparent entries are future holders and are excluded from that historical percentage denominator as well. These are title-route relationship percentages, not DNA inheritance percentages.

First recorded holder → present holder

Saved route classification: Marriage-linked blood route

Saved relationship description: 27th great grandfather's wife's great grandfather's second great nephew's wife

Genealogical distance travelled: 39 saved relationship steps (32 ascending, 3 descending, 1 lateral/collateral, 3 marriage bridges).

Blood/collateral share of the classified route: 92.3% (7.7% marriage-bridge steps).

This does not claim the first holder is a strict blood relative of the present holder. It means the saved route is predominantly blood/collateral genealogy but crosses one or more marriages, so it is shown as blood-connected rather than discarded as wholly in-law.

View the saved relationship path

Transfer: Grant

Connected with House of Wessex, deprived after conquest.

Relationship to present holder

27th great grandfather's wife's great grandfather's second great nephew's wife
Marriage-linked blood route · Research
View relationship path

Transfer: Crown Grant

Previous holder: Ailid / Æthelgyth, Mesne Lord (Lady)

Granted by William I "The Conqueror" 

Relationship to present holder

29th great uncle
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

13th great aunt's sister's husband's 12th great uncle
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Relationship to present holder

first cousin 29 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

13th great aunt's sister's husband's first cousin 12 times removed
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Forfeited after rebellion against Henry I.

Relationship to present holder

Second cousin 28 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

13th great aunt's sister's husband's second cousin 11 times removed
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Forfeiture

Previous holder: Sir William Bainard, Baron of Baynard

Relationship to present holder

28th great grandfather
Blood · Documented
View relationship path

22nd great grandmother's partner's father
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Royal Grant

To the Earls of Clare.” For the Baynard forfeiture

Relationship to present holder

27th great grandfather
Blood · Documented
View relationship path

21st great grandmother's husband's great grandfather
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Relationship to present holder

27th great grandfather
Blood · Documented
View relationship path

23rd great grandmother's 1st husband
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Transfer

Relationship to present holder

23rd great grandfather
Blood · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Relationship to present holder

23rd great uncle
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Relationship to present holder

23rd great uncle
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Other

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Adam de Botefoy, John de Botefoy, Sir Robert de Bokenham, Richard Trussbut, John Trussbut, Nicholas Trusbut, Laurence Trussbut, Thomas Trusbut, William Trusbut, Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)

Relationship to present holder

27th great uncle
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Other

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Roger Trussebut, John de Botefoy, Sir Robert de Bokenham, Richard Trussbut, John Trussbut, Nicholas Trusbut, Laurence Trussbut, Thomas Trusbut, William Trusbut, Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)

Relationship to present holder

22nd great grandmother's husband's wife's first cousin once removed
Marriage-linked blood route · Research
View relationship path

second cousin 26 times removed
Collateral · Research
View relationship path

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Roger Trussebut, Adam de Botefoy, Sir Robert de Bokenham, Richard Trussbut, John Trussbut, Nicholas Trusbut, Laurence Trussbut, Thomas Trusbut, William Trusbut, Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)

Relationship to present holder

third cousin 25 times removed
Collateral · Research
View relationship path

22nd great grandmother's husband's wife's first cousin twice removed
Marriage-linked blood route · Research
View relationship path

Transfer: Grant

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Roger Trussebut, Adam de Botefoy, John de Botefoy, Richard Trussbut, John Trussbut, Nicholas Trusbut, Laurence Trussbut, Thomas Trusbut, William Trusbut, Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)

Shouldham Priory fee

Relationship to present holder

second cousin 21 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

19th great uncle's first cousin twice removed
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Succession

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Roger Trussebut, Adam de Botefoy, John de Botefoy, Sir Robert de Bokenham, John Trussbut, Nicholas Trusbut, Laurence Trussbut, Thomas Trusbut, William Trusbut, Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)

Previous holder: Roger Trussebut

Relationship to present holder

27th great uncle
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Succession

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Roger Trussebut, Adam de Botefoy, John de Botefoy, Sir Robert de Bokenham, Richard Trussbut, Nicholas Trusbut, Laurence Trussbut, Thomas Trusbut, William Trusbut, Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)

Previous holder: Richard Trussbut

Relationship to present holder

first cousin 27 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Roger Trussebut, Adam de Botefoy, John de Botefoy, Sir Robert de Bokenham, John Trussbut, Nicholas Trusbut, Laurence Trussbut, Thomas Trusbut, William Trusbut, Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)

Previous holder: John Trussbut

Relationship to present holder

second cousin 26 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Roger Trussebut, Adam de Botefoy, John de Botefoy, Sir Robert de Bokenham, Richard Trussbut, John Trussbut, Laurence Trussbut, Thomas Trusbut, William Trusbut, Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)

Previous holder: Richard Trussbut

Relationship to present holder

fourth cousin 21 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Roger Trussebut, Adam de Botefoy, John de Botefoy, Sir Robert de Bokenham, Richard Trussbut, John Trussbut, Nicholas Trusbut, Thomas Trusbut, William Trusbut, Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)

Previous holder: Nicholas Trusbut

Relationship to present holder

fifth cousin 20 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Roger Trussebut, Adam de Botefoy, John de Botefoy, Sir Robert de Bokenham, Richard Trussbut, John Trussbut, Nicholas Trusbut, Laurence Trussbut, William Trusbut, Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)

Previous holder: Laurence Trussbut

Relationship to present holder

6th cousin 19 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Roger Trussebut, Adam de Botefoy, John de Botefoy, Sir Robert de Bokenham, Richard Trussbut, John Trussbut, Nicholas Trusbut, Laurence Trussbut, Thomas Trusbut, Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)

Previous holder: Thomas Trusbut

Relationship to present holder

6th cousin 19 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance / heiress succession

Holding arrangement: Trust

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory
Co-holders: Roger Trussebut, Adam de Botefoy, John de Botefoy, Sir Robert de Bokenham, Richard Trussbut, John Trussbut, Nicholas Trusbut, Laurence Trussbut, Thomas Trusbut, William Trusbut

Previous holder: William Trusbut

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 1
From: Trusbut family
To: Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt), heiress
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance / heiress succession
Approx. Date / Period: 15th c.
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: IPM/fee evidence anchors Thomas Trusbut holding Watlington; no specific heiress conveyance located.
Archive Ref / Object: IPM digital edition
Conflict / Caveat: Holding is evidenced; inheritance mechanism still requires will/IPM/heirship record.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will, IPM, partition or settlement showing Jane's title.
Priority: HIGH
Source URL: https://inquisitionspostmortem.ac.uk/view/inquisition/22-791/794.html
Research Note: Search Trusbut wills, IPMs, fines and marriage settlements.

Source: IPM/fee evidence anchors Thomas Trusbut holding Watlington; no specific heiress conveyance located. — source link

Relationship to present holder

7th cousin 18 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Marriage / jure uxoris

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory - Colts - Gawsell
Co-holders: Richard Gawsell, Henry VIII (Dissolution / Crown vesting)

Previous holder: Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt), Heiress

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 2
From: Jane Parr (Trusbut) (Colt)
To: Thomas Colt Jr
Transfer Type in Chain: Marriage / jure uxoris
Approx. Date / Period: 15th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: Historic England states Trusbutt manor passed by marriage to Thomas Colt; no operative marriage settlement or fine located.
Archive Ref / Object: Historic England narrative
Conflict / Caveat: Official corroboration is not the underlying instrument.
Missing Operative Instrument: Marriage settlement, fine, feoffment or heirship record.
Priority: HIGH
Source URL: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry
Research Note: Search Feet of Fines, Common Pleas and HARE early title deeds.

Source: Historic England states Trusbutt manor passed by marriage to Thomas Colt; no operative marriage settlement or fine located. — source link

Relationship to present holder

7th cousin 18 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Other

Holding arrangement: Other

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory - Colts - Gawsell
Co-holders: Thomas Colt, Jr, Henry VIII (Dissolution / Crown vesting)

Previous holder: Thomas Colt, Jr

Relationship to present holder

fourth cousin 18 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Forfeiture

Holding arrangement: Trust

Shared holding: Shouldham Priory - Colts - Gawsell
Co-holders: Thomas Colt, Jr, Richard Gawsell

Previous holder: Richard Gawsell

Relationship to present holder

fifth cousin 18 times removed.
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

15th great grandmother's partner
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Marriage / jure uxoris

Holding arrangement: Other

Previous holder: King Henry VIII (Dissolution / Crown vesting)

Relationship to present holder

9th cousin 18 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

15th great uncle
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

16th c.

John Colt

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Thomas Colt, Jr

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 3
From: Thomas Colt Jr
To: John Colt
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: 16th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: User chain only in this pass; no will/IPM located.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: No new primary transfer record found.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will/probate/IPM.
Priority: MEDIUM
Source URL: Search PCC/Norfolk probate + IPM.

Source: User chain only in this pass; no will/IPM located. — source link

Relationship to present holder

8th cousin 17 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

15th great aunt's father's wife's father
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: John Colt

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 4
From: John Colt
To: Sir George Colt
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: 16th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: User chain and later official narrative anchor George Colt as seller; no inheritance instrument located.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: No new primary transfer record found.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will/probate/IPM.
Priority: MEDIUM
Source URL: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry
Research Note: Search Colt family probate and fines.

Source: User chain and later official narrative anchor George Colt as seller; no inheritance instrument located. — source link

Relationship to present holder

9th cousin 16 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

15th great aunt's father's wife's brother
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

1587 or 1596

Thomas Shouldham

Transfer: Sale

Previous holder: George Colt

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 5
From: Sir George Colt
To: Thomas Shouldham
Transfer Type in Chain: Sale
Approx. Date / Period: 1587 or 1596
Documentary Status: CONFLICT
Best Evidence Located: Historic England says 1587. Commercial title catalogue says 1596 and supplies alleged wording 'manor of Watlington Coltes or Watlington Trusbuttes...'
Archive Ref / Object: Exact deed not located
Conflict / Caveat: Two incompatible secondary dates. Commercial wording is a search lead, not proof.
Missing Operative Instrument: Original bargain & sale / feoffment / fine / enrolment with exact manor wording.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry
Research Note: Search NRO HARE deeds plus enrolled records using all place-name variants and the quoted parcel list.

Source: Historic England — source link

Relationship to present holder

second cousin 15 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

first cousin 16 times removed's 1st husband
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

shortly after 1587 / late 16th c.

Sir Francis Gawdy, Knight

Transfer: Sale

Previous holder: Thomas Shouldham

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 6
From: Thomas Shouldham
To: Sir Francis Gawdy
Transfer Type in Chain: Sale
Approx. Date / Period: shortly after 1587 / late 16th c.
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: Historic England states Shouldham shortly afterwards sold Colt's manor to Judge Gawdy. Associated 1587 licence and 1590 feoffment exist in HARE references but do not yet prove Colts transfer.
Archive Ref / Object: HARE 2719; HARE 979 (transcribed refs)
Conflict / Caveat: Associated transactions may be title recitals rather than the Colts deed itself.
Missing Operative Instrument: Specific Shouldham→Gawdy conveyance naming Colts/Trusbutts.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1020446?section=official-list-entry
Research Note: Verify HARE 2719/HARE 979 and search adjacent deeds.

Source: Historic England states Shouldham shortly afterwards sold Colt's manor to Judge Gawdy. Associated 1587 licence and 1590 feoffment exist in HARE references but do not yet prove Colts transfer. — source link

Relationship to present holder

fourth cousin 18 times removed
Collateral · Research
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Sir Francis Gawdy, Knight

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Sir Francis Gawdy, Knight

Relationship to present holder

Collateral
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Sir Francis Gawdy, Knight

Relationship to present holder

fifth cousin 17 times removed
Collateral · Research
View relationship path

Previous holder: Elizabeth Gawdy (Newport/Hatton)

Relationship to present holder

6th cousin 16 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Marriage / jure uxoris

Previous holder: Countess Frances Rich

Relationship to present holder

fourth cousin 13 times removed.
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

ultimately 1632

Sir John Hare, Knt, MP

Transfer: Sale

Previous holder: Robert Rich, 2nd Earl of Warwick

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 8
From: Frances / Robert Rich
To: Sir John Hare
Transfer Type in Chain: Sale / acquisition
Approx. Date / Period: ultimately 1632
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: Historic England gives 1632. Genuine 1611 Rich bargain & sale and 1628 deed to lead uses survive for associated local manors; exact 1632 Colts deed not located.
Archive Ref / Object: Hare 3083/2; Hare 3085
Conflict / Caveat: The 1628 instrument names Gawsells but not Colts in catalogue abstract.
Missing Operative Instrument: 1632 deed/recovery/fine naming Colts/Trusbutts, or a recital proving inclusion.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/297d3b1d-dad8-42d6-b050-1bcf5e0e2de1
Research Note: Order 1611 and 1628 deeds; search HARE sequence around 1632.

Source: Historic England gives 1632. Genuine 1611 Rich bargain & sale and 1628 deed to lead uses survive for associated local manors; exact 1632 Colts deed not located. — source link

Relationship to present holder

6th cousin 15 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Sir John Hare, Knt, MP

Relationship to present holder

7th cousin 14 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Sir Ralph Hare, MP, 1st Baronet of Stow Bardolph

Relationship to present holder

Collateral
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Sir Thomas Hare, 2nd Baronet

Relationship to present holder

6th cousin 10 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Sir Ralph Hare, 3rd BARONET

Relationship to present holder

6th cousin 10 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Sir Thomas Hare, 4th Baronet

Relationship to present holder

6th cousin 10 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Sir George Hare, 5th Baronet

Relationship to present holder

7th cousin 9 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

c.1760s–1770s

Thomas Plestow

Transfer: Purchase

Previous holder: Lady Mary Hare (Harris)

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 10
From: Lady Mary Hare
To: Thomas Plestow
Transfer Type in Chain: Purchase
Approx. Date / Period: c.1760s–1770s
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: By 10 Aug 1779 Plestow of Watlington Hall was requesting court books for Watlington and Tottenhill. Purchase deed itself not located.
Archive Ref / Object: BL/CS 4/57
Conflict / Caveat: Strong administration/possession evidence, not conveyance.
Missing Operative Instrument: Hare→Plestow lease & release / bargain & sale / mortgage / recovery / abstract.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://nrocatalogue.norfolk.gov.uk/index.php/mr-plestow-watlington-hall-to-philip-case-asks-for-court-books-of-manors-of-watlington-and-tottenhill-as-he-declines-the-stewardship-with-list-of-court-books-receipted-by-henry-bell-10-aug-1779
Research Note: Search NRO HARE and Philip Case/BL solicitor papers, approx. 1760–1780.

Source: By 10 Aug 1779 Plestow of Watlington Hall was requesting court books for Watlington and Tottenhill. Purchase deed itself not located. — source link

Relationship to present holder

fourth cousin 12 times removed's husband
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

late 18th–early 19th c.

Sir Thomas Berners Plestow, Knight

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Thomas Plestow

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 11
From: Thomas Plestow
To: Sir Thomas Berners Plestow
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: late 18th–early 19th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: No operative probate/settlement located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: Family succession from chain not independently instrumented here.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will/probate/settlement.
Priority: MEDIUM
Source URL: Search Prerogative Court and NRO family papers.

Source: No operative probate/settlement located in this pass. — source link

Relationship to present holder

fifth cousin 11 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Sir Thomas Berners Plestow, Knight

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 12
From: Sir Thomas Berners Plestow
To: Charles Berners Plestow
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: 19th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: No operative probate/settlement located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: Same.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will/probate/settlement.
Priority: MEDIUM
Source URL: Search probate and Watlington Hall estate abstracts.

Source: No operative probate/settlement located in this pass. — source link

Relationship to present holder

6th cousin 10 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: Charles Berners Plestow

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 13
From: Charles Berners Plestow
To: Charles John Berners Plestow
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: 19th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: No operative probate/settlement located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: Same.
Missing Operative Instrument: Will/probate/settlement.
Priority: MEDIUM
Source URL: Search probate and estate papers.

Source: No operative probate/settlement located in this pass. — source link

Relationship to present holder

7th cousin 9 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Sale

Holding arrangement: Share

Previous holder: Charles John Berners Plestow

Transfer: Purchase

Previous holder: Charles John Berners Plestow

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 14
From: Charles John Berners Plestow
To: George Coote / 1869 purchaser
Transfer Type in Chain: Sale
Approx. Date / Period: 1869
Documentary Status: PARTIAL
Best Evidence Located: Actual Cambridge sale-particulars catalogue hit; Heritage Gateway confirms an 1869 sale map. Completion conveyance not yet located.
Archive Ref / Object: Cambridge Map Dept sale particulars; 1869 sale map
Conflict / Caveat: Sale material is strong but purchaser, lots and manorial-right clauses need the original particulars/plan.
Missing Operative Instrument: Executed conveyance/completion deed and annotated sale particulars.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://archivesearch.lib.cam.ac.uk/repositories/2/archival_objects/263073
Research Note: Order complete Cambridge item; trace auctioneer/solicitor papers and NRO deeds.

Source: Actual Cambridge sale-particulars catalogue hit; Heritage Gateway confirms an 1869 sale map. Completion conveyance not yet located. — source link

Relationship to present holder

15th cousin twice removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

11th great uncle's first cousin 7 times removed
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

late 19th/early 20th c.

Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys

Transfer: Inheritance

Previous holder: George Coote

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 15
From: George Coote
To: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys
Transfer Type in Chain: Inheritance
Approx. Date / Period: late 19th/early 20th c.
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: No will/probate located in this pass.
Archive Ref / Object: —
Conflict / Caveat: 1883 directory confirms G. Coote as lord of Gawsels, but not the inheritance instrument.
Missing Operative Instrument: Coote will/probate/assent.
Priority: HIGH
Source URL: https://www.origins.org.uk/genuki/NFK/places/w/watlington/white1883.shtml
Research Note: Search probate calendar/will and title abstracts.

Source: No will/probate located in this pass. — source link

Relationship to present holder

16th cousin once removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

11th great uncle's first cousin 8 times removed
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Purchase

Holding arrangement: Trust

Shared holding: Watlington, Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham, Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts, and Tottenhill
Co-holders: Crown (Queen Elizabeth II), Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston

Previous holder: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys

[Conveyance Register crosswalk snapshot — 2026-08-30; later Pass 111/live evidence takes precedence]
Stage: 16
From: Mary Rhoda Spooner Humphreys
To: Rev. Robert Holmes Edleston
Transfer Type in Chain: Purchase
Approx. Date / Period: 1929
Documentary Status: GAP
Best Evidence Located: Commercial title catalogue/user chain says 1929 sale. Durham archive proves Edleston's manorial conveyances and solicitor correspondence survive generally, but no Watlington-specific item was found.
Archive Ref / Object: Durham D/HH 8/2 comparator records
Conflict / Caveat: 1929 transfer remains unverified by actual instrument in this pass.
Missing Operative Instrument: Executed 1929 conveyance, contract, abstract of title, correspondence and schedule of deeds.
Priority: CRITICAL
Source URL: https://durhamrecordoffice.org.uk/catalogue-item/?ImagesOnly=&ItemID=165400&ItemNum=250&PageNum=10&Variations=
Research Note: Ask Durham to search D/HH and uncatalogued Holmes/Edleston papers by all manor aliases and Humphreys/Coote.

Source: Commercial title catalogue/user chain says 1929 sale. Durham archive proves Edleston's manorial conveyances and solicitor correspondence survive generally, but no Watlington-specific item was found. — source link

Relationship to present holder

13th cousin 6 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

second cousin 14 times removed's 7th great nephew
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Legal Vesting

Shared holding: Watlington, Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham, Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts, and Tottenhill
Co-holders: Rev. Robert Holmes Edleston, Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston

Previous holder: Rev. Robert Holmes Edleston, Baron de Montalbo

Without issue

Relationship to present holder

9th cousin four times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

first cousin 8 times removed's nephew's wife's first cousin twice removed
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Court Order

Shared holding: Watlington, Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham, Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts, and Tottenhill
Co-holders: Rev. Robert Holmes Edleston, Crown (Queen Elizabeth II)

Previous holder: Crown (Queen Elizabeth II), Probate, Extant

Relationship to present holder

13th cousin 6 times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

second cousin 14 times removed's 7th great niece
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Legal Vesting

Previous holder: Sarah Alice Cumming Edleston, Mesne Lord (Lady)

Relationship to present holder

9th cousin four times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

first cousin 8 times removed's nephew's wife's first cousin twice removed
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Legal Vesting

Holding arrangement: Trust — Administrators (Eric Holmes + Bertram Stephen Liddon Surtees Raine)

Shared holding: 31 May 1966–14 Jun 1971 Eric Holmes + Bertram Stephen Liddon Surtees Raine, administrators de bonis non

Previous holder: Crown Statutory Custody (Queen Elizabeth II), Probate, Extant

31 May 1966–14 Jun 1971 Eric Holmes + Bertram Stephen Liddon Surtees Raine, administrators de bonis non

Relationship to present holder

10th cousin five times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

second cousin 11 times removed's 6th great niece's husband's father.
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Grant

Previous holder: Eric Richard Hanby Holmes & Party, Administrators: de bonis non

Vesting Assent

Relationship to present holder

10th cousin five times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

second cousin 11 times removed's 6th great niece's husband's father
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

21 Dec 1977 – 20 Nov 2016

Richard John Hanby Holmes

Transfer: Vesting

Previous holder: Eric Richard Hanby Holmes

Relationship to present holder

11th cousin four times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

second cousin 11 times removed's 6th great niece's late husband
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Legal Vesting

Holding arrangement: Trust

Previous holder: Richard John Hanby Holmes

Relationship to present holder

11th cousin four times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

second cousin 11 times removed's 6th great niece's late husband
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Grant

Holding arrangement: Trust

Previous holder: Richard John Hanby Holmes

Relationship to present holder

9th cousin four times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

first cousin 8 times removed's nephew's wife's first cousin twice removed
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Grant

Previous holder: Crown (Queen Elizabeth II)

Relationship to present holder

11th cousin four times removed
Collateral · Documented
View relationship path

second cousin 11 times removed's 6th great niece
Marriage-linked blood route · Documented
View relationship path

Transfer: Transfer

Previous holder: Olivia Mary Holmes

Relationship to present holder

Self / present holder
Direct identity · Documented · 0 relationship steps

Transfer: Succession

Previous holder: William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West, Esq., Lord of Watlington-West Norfolk

Relationship to present holder

Son
Blood · Documented
View relationship path

Source / Document Library

Reusable evidence belonging to this Manor / Lordship entity. A current, unended Manor ↔ Title association shares one library; historical or uncertain associations keep separate libraries.

General Sources (1)

MHR-S-0047250 · VG168, Shouldham, Villiage Green

VG168, Shouldham

2026-09-04_summary_of_title_NK419172_GOV.UK_.pdf PDF · 713.7 KB · Public
Download
2026-09-04_title_plan_NK419172_GOV.UK_.pdf PDF · 142.2 KB · Public
Download
Source notes / extracted text

HM Registry of Land 'seized, stolen' via Parish Council whilst vesting of the Title occurred (High Court determination on succession)

https://www.google.com/maps/place/52%C2%B039'06.8%22N+0%C2%B028'41.5%22E/@52.6517525,0.478274,15a,75y,81.9h,81.54t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1susnFd-u2bUco899EOc_Haw!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D8.464301044446415%26panoid%3DusnFd-u2bUco899EOc_Haw%26yaw%3D81.89677470832181!7i16384!8i8192!4m4!3m3!8m2!3d52.6519!4d0.4782?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI2MDkwMS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D

Lordship / Title Associations

Associations are recorded by period so changes in estate composition do not imply that every manor remained attached to the same title indefinitely.

Research Status / Wanted Evidence

12 Feb 1930 Humphreys -> Edleston conveyance Resolved

Wanted evidence: None for the deed itself. The genuine predecessor gap is the 16 Dec 1929 deed and the pre-1930 physical parcel chain.

Source: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_5_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0310; Pass 42/77 cumulative handover.

Record / Parcel: 12 Feb 1930 Humphreys -> Edleston conveyance
Actual record status: RECOVERED — PRIMARY
Evidence recovered: User-supplied deed images analysed in Pass 42/rights project
What it conclusively proves: Humphreys, as beneficial owner for £100, conveyed Watlington; Watlington Gawsells with West Dereham; Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts; and Tottenhill, 'as far as ... subsisting', with rights, royalties, members and appurtenances, in fee simple.
What it does NOT prove: Does not prove that every historic Colts field remained in Humphreys's title or was still a member/appurtenance in 1930.
Remaining exact missing item: None for the deed itself. The genuine predecessor gap is the 16 Dec 1929 deed and the pre-1930 physical parcel chain.
Priority: CLOSED / core evidence
Loop status: CLOSED — DO NOT RE-SEARCH
Source / project evidence: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_5_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0310; Pass 42/77 cumulative handover.

16 Dec 1929 Green + Public Trustee -> Humphreys Open

Wanted evidence: First re-check prior user image/ZIP/conveyance batches if accessible. If still absent, recover the separate 16 Dec 1929 conveyance. In parallel, identify the 1897 testatrix and the Edward Humphreys legatee before using that network clue for capacity/root-of-title analysis. Do not repeat title-only/index searches unless a new file surface or archive source becomes available.

Source: WCT-DIG-0316; private 1930 deed recital; WCT-DIG-0469/0470; WCT-DIG-0471; current conversation/library search. Pass 100 current-index negative control added.

Record / Parcel: 16 Dec 1929 Green + Public Trustee -> Humphreys
Actual record status: RECITAL RECOVERED; SEPARATE ORIGINAL NOT SURFACED IN CURRENT PROJECT SEARCH
Evidence recovered: Express recital inside the 12 Feb 1930 primary deed; Pass 97 independent contemporary controls establish J.H.T. Green as a Weatherall & Green property professional; Pass 99 adds a 31 Jul 1897 Morning Post indexed will report naming the exact J.H.T. Green and an Edward Humphreys as separate legatees in the same will. The Edward identity is unresolved. Pass 100 indexed conversation+Library searches using exact parties/date and PDF/image-only filters again did not surface the separate original. Pass 101 title-only Library searching for the Batch-5 project name, the 16 Dec 1929 date and exact parties still did not surface the underlying image/ZIP/conveyance artifact; only cumulative/derived references surfaced. Pass 102 exact public-web searching using the date plus Watlington Gawsells / Trusbutts / Tottenhill / Public Trustee did not surface the separate instrument.
What it conclusively proves: The 1930 recital proves Green + Public Trustee granted to Humphreys in fee simple the hereditaments later conveyed to Edleston, together with other hereditaments. Pass 97 independently proves Green's professional identity/capacity in property work, not his 1929 ownership.
What it does NOT prove: Does not expose the 1929 schedule, parcel descriptions, reservations, root of title, consideration or party capacities. The 1897 newspaper clue does not prove that its Edward Humphreys is the solicitor in the 1913 Spooner/Coote probate network, Mary Rhoda's husband/relative, or connected to Watlington. The fresh negative search does not establish that the user never uploaded the instrument in an earlier unsurfaced image/ZIP batch. Pass 101's negative Library result remains a retrieval limitation, not evidence that the original was never uploaded. This repeated public-index negative is not evidence that the deed is lost or was never supplied privately.
Remaining exact missing item: First re-check prior user image/ZIP/conveyance batches if accessible. If still absent, recover the separate 16 Dec 1929 conveyance. In parallel, identify the 1897 testatrix and the Edward Humphreys legatee before using that network clue for capacity/root-of-title analysis. Do not repeat title-only/index searches unless a new file surface or archive source becomes available.
Priority: CRITICAL
Loop status: OPEN — VERIFY PRIOR UPLOADS BEFORE EXTERNAL RE-RESEARCH
Source / project evidence: WCT-DIG-0316; private 1930 deed recital; WCT-DIG-0469/0470; WCT-DIG-0471; current conversation/library search. Pass 100 current-index negative control added.

27 May 1954 Sarah Edleston personal-representative assent Resolved

Wanted evidence: None for this assent itself.

Source: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_1_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0317.

Record / Parcel: 27 May 1954 Sarah Edleston personal-representative assent
Actual record status: RECOVERED — PRIMARY
Evidence recovered: User-supplied primary assent
What it conclusively proves: Selected Yorkshire manors were assented; Watlington was not included in this selected-manor document.
What it does NOT prove: Does not transfer or define Watlington Colts physical land.
Remaining exact missing item: None for this assent itself.
Priority: CLOSED / negative control
Loop status: CLOSED — DO NOT RE-SEARCH
Source / project evidence: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_1_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0317.

31 May 1966 administration de bonis non Open

Wanted evidence: Separate grant only if probate-file completeness is desired.

Source: WCT-DIG-0318; 1977 supplied assent.

Record / Parcel: 31 May 1966 administration de bonis non
Actual record status: PRIMARY FACT RECITED IN 1977 ASSENT
Evidence recovered: 21 Dec 1977 primary assent expressly recites Eric Holmes + Raine receiving administration of Robert's remaining estate
What it conclusively proves: Establishes the probate-administration gateway used in the 1977 Watlington-Colts assent.
What it does NOT prove: Not a physical-parcel schedule; separate grant image is not required to decide pre-1930 Colts land.
Remaining exact missing item: Separate grant only if probate-file completeness is desired.
Priority: NON-BLOCKING
Loop status: SUBSTANTIVELY CLOSED FOR CURRENT PURPOSE
Source / project evidence: WCT-DIG-0318; 1977 supplied assent.

30 Oct 1969 assent to Richard John Hanby Holmes Open

Wanted evidence: Actual 30 Oct 1969 assent.

Source: Referenced in WCT-DIG-0319 / supplied 1977 vesting assent.

Record / Parcel: 30 Oct 1969 assent to Richard John Hanby Holmes
Actual record status: NOT SEPARATELY RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Referenced by second 21 Dec 1977 vesting assent
What it conclusively proves: Shows there was an earlier Sarah-estate vesting step before the residual 1977 sweep.
What it does NOT prove: Does not currently identify which manors were in the 1969 schedule.
Remaining exact missing item: Actual 30 Oct 1969 assent.
Priority: MEDIUM / chain cleanup
Loop status: OPEN BUT NON-BLOCKING FOR LAND
Source / project evidence: Referenced in WCT-DIG-0319 / supplied 1977 vesting assent.

21 Dec 1977 first assent — Robert unadministered estate Resolved

Wanted evidence: None for this assent itself.

Source: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_2_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0318.

Record / Parcel: 21 Dec 1977 first assent — Robert unadministered estate
Actual record status: RECOVERED — PRIMARY
Evidence recovered: User-supplied primary assent
What it conclusively proves: Expressly schedules 'Watlington Colts otherwise Trusbutts' within the Tottenhill/Watlington manor group and moves it into Eric's Sarah-executor capacity.
What it does NOT prove: Does not identify historic Colts physical parcels or prove they were still attached in 1930.
Remaining exact missing item: None for this assent itself.
Priority: CLOSED / core chain
Loop status: CLOSED — DO NOT RE-SEARCH
Source / project evidence: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_2_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0318.

21 Dec 1977 second vesting assent -> Richard J.H. Holmes Resolved

Wanted evidence: None for this deed itself; 1969 assent only for completeness.

Source: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_4_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0319.

Record / Parcel: 21 Dec 1977 second vesting assent -> Richard J.H. Holmes
Actual record status: RECOVERED — PRIMARY
Evidence recovered: User-supplied primary vesting assent
What it conclusively proves: Vests Cranwich and residual Sarah-estate manors/lordships not already included in the 1969 assent in Richard in fee simple.
What it does NOT prove: Does not identify surviving physical Colts land.
Remaining exact missing item: None for this deed itself; 1969 assent only for completeness.
Priority: CLOSED / core chain
Loop status: CLOSED — DO NOT RE-SEARCH
Source / project evidence: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_4_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0319.

22 May 2017 probate grant — Richard -> Olivia executor authority Open

Wanted evidence: No probate record needed for the pre-1930 parcel issue. Current transfer is treated under the user's later working premise, not independently re-proved here.

Source: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_3_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0320.

Record / Parcel: 22 May 2017 probate grant — Richard -> Olivia executor authority
Actual record status: RECOVERED — PRIMARY
Evidence recovered: User-supplied High Court probate grant
What it conclusively proves: Richard died 20 Nov 2016 and Olivia Mary Holmes received executor/personal-representative authority.
What it does NOT prove: Probate authority alone does not prove beneficial ownership of a physical Colts parcel.
Remaining exact missing item: No probate record needed for the pre-1930 parcel issue. Current transfer is treated under the user's later working premise, not independently re-proved here.
Priority: CLOSED AS AUTHORITY
Loop status: CLOSED — DO NOT RE-SEARCH
Source / project evidence: Private project: Watlington-Colts_Batch_3_Enhanced_Ordered; WCT-DIG-0320.

Current Watlington-West transfer Open

Wanted evidence: Executed transfer only if independent modern-title proof is later required.

Source: Pass 16 working-premise section preserved in cumulative handover.

Record / Parcel: Current Watlington-West transfer
Actual record status: WORKING PREMISE — NOT INDEPENDENTLY RECOVERED HERE
Evidence recovered: User instructed project to treat current transfer as conveying everything still historically associated with Watlington-Colts/Trussbutts
What it conclusively proves: Removes current executed transfer as the project's rights-survival bottleneck.
What it does NOT prove: Does not prove any disputed physical parcel was still attached to the manor in 1930 or today.
Remaining exact missing item: Executed transfer only if independent modern-title proof is later required.
Priority: NON-BLOCKING BY USER INSTRUCTION
Loop status: DO NOT REOPEN UNLESS USER CHANGES PREMISE
Source / project evidence: Pass 16 working-premise section preserved in cumulative handover.

HARE 2495 — 1633 Field Book Open

Wanted evidence: Full HARE 2495 original/complete copy if needed for exact parcel boundaries and tenure.

Source: Historic England NHLE 1020446; NRO HARE 2495.

Record / Parcel: HARE 2495 — 1633 Field Book
Actual record status: PARTIAL CONTENT RECOVERED VIA HISTORIC ENGLAND; ORIGINAL NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: HE summary identifies capital messuage/Colt's close, four tenements/yards, Alder Carr, Appletons, Batchelors and acreages/relative locations
What it conclusively proves: Establishes a strong positive historic Colts physical parcel inventory.
What it does NOT prove: Does not give complete tenant/abuttal/rent/tenure wording for every parcel.
Remaining exact missing item: Full HARE 2495 original/complete copy if needed for exact parcel boundaries and tenure.
Priority: HIGH
Loop status: OPEN — BUT HISTORIC IDENTITY ALREADY STRONG
Source / project evidence: Historic England NHLE 1020446; NRO HARE 2495.

HARE 6832 — 1811 Map of Estates of Sir Thomas Hare Open

Wanted evidence: Actual Shouldham/Colt's Farm section of HARE 6832. Also extract the actual 1798 Shouldham IR 23 owner/occupier rows before interpreting the 1811 estate map.

Source: Historic England NHLE 1020446; NRO HARE 6832.

Record / Parcel: HARE 6832 — 1811 Map of Estates of Sir Thomas Hare
Actual record status: NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Historic England cites it and uses it to state early-19C Colt's Farm included the whole scheduled area Pass 107 adds a quantified predecessor landscape control: the Cooke/Arthur Young enclosure table records Shouldham + Garboiesthorpe at 5,570 acres in 1794. Pass 108 verifies direct digital access to the 1798 Shouldham Land Tax Redemption/IR 23 owner-occupier return, providing a new pre-1811 control immediately before HARE 6832.
What it conclusively proves: Provides published/official evidence of Colt's Farm continuity into early 19C. This helps frame the scale of the landscape restructuring before the 1811 estate map. If the actual 1798 return identifies the same estate proprietor/tenant seen around Colt's Farm, it will materially constrain the 1794->1811 continuity question.
What it does NOT prove: No parcel colours, numbers, field boundaries or ownership legend have been read directly. It does not identify any Hare or Colts allotment and cannot substitute for HARE 6832.
Remaining exact missing item: Actual Shouldham/Colt's Farm section of HARE 6832. Also extract the actual 1798 Shouldham IR 23 owner/occupier rows before interpreting the 1811 estate map.
Priority: CRITICAL
Loop status: OPEN — REAL MISSING RECORD
Source / project evidence: Historic England NHLE 1020446; NRO HARE 6832.

1843 Shouldham tithe map + apportionment Open

Wanted evidence: Search the tithe collection directly by County=Norfolk / Parish=Shouldham with personal names blank; inspect transcript/original/map for Colt's Hall, Homestall and Further Homestall; record the returned IR 29/23/[item] and IR 30/23/[same item], exact plot numbers, owner, occupier, acreage and cultivation. Cross-check with NCC L12/R61436/C85456.

Source: Historic England + TNA/NRO tithe route. WCT-DIG-0449/0450; Pass 100 current NCC MapServer validation.

Record / Parcel: 1843 Shouldham tithe map + apportionment
Actual record status: PARCEL NAMES KNOWN; NORFOLK SERIES FIXED; DIRECT SHOULDHAM PARISH-SEARCH ROUTE VERIFIED; ACTUAL PLOT/OWNER/OCCUPIER STILL NOT READ
Evidence recovered: Historic England: Homestall east/southeast of Colt's Hall; Batchelors = Further Homestall. Pass 99 targeted public/TNA searches again failed to surface the exact Shouldham IR 30/IR 29 reference, plot numbers, owner or occupier. Pass 100 independently reverified the live Norfolk County Council ncc_tithe cache architecture/parameters used by WCT-DIG-0450. Pass 101 exact-name searching again independently reached Historic England's 1843 'Homestall' / 'Further Homestall' statement but did not expose the plot number, owner, occupier or exact IR reference. Pass 102 adds a near-date control: the 1835 West Norfolk poll-book index independently records 'Lemmon Charles, Shouldham'. Pass 104 corrects the Lemmon identity control: Discover Downham says Mary Winearls was Charles's first wife (m. Shouldham 1821) and Hannah Dean his second wife, while the Shouldham baptism transcription continues to show farmer Charles + Mary in later 1850s entries. Pass 105 official TNA catalogue controls prove Norfolk apportionments are IR 29/23/[item] and corresponding maps IR 30/23/[same item]. Pass 106 verifies that the current tithe interface permits County/Parish-only searching without a personal name and exposes transcript, original apportionment, map and the TNA piece/sub-piece reference from the result. Pass 107 adds the 1794 combined-enclosure scale of 5,570 acres as a predecessor control. Pass 108 adds a directly searchable 1798 Shouldham owner/occupier control from digitised IR 23, giving an independent predecessor checkpoint before the 1843 tithe.
What it conclusively proves: Creates real 1633 -> 1811 -> 1843 parcel genealogy. It strengthens the dated pre-1843 presence of Charles Lemmon at Shouldham, but not his title to a particular parcel. The early Charles + Mary farmer sequence is now better contextualised, but the post-1840 family identity is not secure enough to substitute for the tithe apportionment. The archive-reference uncertainty is now narrowed from the entire TNA tithe system to Shouldham's final Norfolk item number. The final Shouldham IR item is no longer a prerequisite to accessing the tithe; it can be learned from the returned parish record/map. The quantified enclosure context can be used to sanity-check later parish/farm acreages but supplies no tithe proprietor or plot identity. A 1798 proprietor/main-tenant match cannot replace the tithe but can test whether the later Hare/Lemmon model is already visible before 1811.
What it does NOT prove: No exact tithe plot number, owner, occupier, acreage or use has yet been extracted. The actual target tile image still has not been read, so no plot number or apportionment identity is claimed. Pass 101 did not obtain or read the target tithe tile itself, so the plot number remains unverified. The 1835 poll index does not expose the qualifying property and therefore cannot identify the tithe owner/occupier or prove Colts Hall ownership. No wife chronology, directory label or poll-book entry proves who owned or occupied Homestall/Further Homestall in the 1843 tithe. The later Mary/Hannah conflict prevents treating every Lemmon entry as one continuous household without further primary evidence. It still does not supply Shouldham's final item number or any Colt's Hall/Homestall plot, owner, occupier, acreage or use. Pass 106 still has not opened the actual Shouldham result, so owner/occupier/plot data remain unproved. No part of the 5,570-acre combined enclosure figure is assigned to Colt's Hall, Homestall or Further Homestall without the award/map/apportionment.
Remaining exact missing item: Search the tithe collection directly by County=Norfolk / Parish=Shouldham with personal names blank; inspect transcript/original/map for Colt's Hall, Homestall and Further Homestall; record the returned IR 29/23/[item] and IR 30/23/[same item], exact plot numbers, owner, occupier, acreage and cultivation. Cross-check with NCC L12/R61436/C85456.
Priority: CRITICAL
Loop status: OPEN — REAL MISSING RECORD
Source / project evidence: Historic England + TNA/NRO tithe route. WCT-DIG-0449/0450; Pass 100 current NCC MapServer validation.

HARE 5370 221 X 6 — Wiggins 1849 survey/terrier/valuation Open

Wanted evidence: Actual Colts entry, if any, from HARE 5370.

Source: NRO HARE 5370 221 X 6; Agricultural History Review citation.

Record / Parcel: HARE 5370 221 X 6 — Wiggins 1849 survey/terrier/valuation
Actual record status: NOT RECOVERED FOR COLTS
Evidence recovered: Exact archive citation independently established
What it conclusively proves: Shows a surviving 1849 Hare-estate terrier/valuation exists at the right date.
What it does NOT prove: No public evidence yet proves Colts Farm is actually listed or gives its tenant/acreage/rent.
Remaining exact missing item: Actual Colts entry, if any, from HARE 5370.
Priority: CRITICAL
Loop status: OPEN — REAL MISSING RECORD
Source / project evidence: NRO HARE 5370 221 X 6; Agricultural History Review citation.

HARE 5466 222 X 5 — Colts Farm schedule Open

Wanted evidence: Actual Colts Farm schedule inside HARE 5466.

Source: NRO/TNA Discovery HARE 5466 222 X 5.

Record / Parcel: HARE 5466 222 X 5 — Colts Farm schedule
Actual record status: COLTS FARM NAME RECOVERED; FULL SCHEDULE NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Official catalogue expressly lists 'Colts Farm in Shouldham' among Hare estate schedules, post-1874 material
What it conclusively proves: Proves a property named Colts Farm remained in Hare estate administration after the reported later title-transition period.
What it does NOT prove: Does not expose tenant, acreage, rent, field list, legal estate or proprietary wording.
Remaining exact missing item: Actual Colts Farm schedule inside HARE 5466.
Priority: ARCHIVE ACCESS
Loop status: FROZEN — PUBLIC/CATALOGUE RESEARCH COMPLETE; REOPEN ONLY WITH ORIGINAL BUNDLE IMAGES/TRANSCRIPT
Source / project evidence: NRO/TNA Discovery HARE 5466 222 X 5.

HARE 6374/6375 + HARE 6956/1-5 — Hare/Hoff exchange Open

Wanted evidence: Full exchange instruments + coloured plans, then overlay Colts/Homestall parcels.

Source: NRO HARE 6374/6375; HARE 6956/1-5.

Record / Parcel: HARE 6374/6375 + HARE 6956/1-5 — Hare/Hoff exchange
Actual record status: EXCHANGE EVENT/MAPS IDENTIFIED; OPERATIVE DETAILS NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Catalogue evidence: c.1900 OS sheets marked for land exchange across Shouldham/Thorpe/Marham/Wormegay
What it conclusively proves: Proves a concrete pre-1930 land-exchange/severance event exists in the Hare estate.
What it does NOT prove: Does not show whether any Colts parcel was exchanged or what rights were reserved.
Remaining exact missing item: Full exchange instruments + coloured plans, then overlay Colts/Homestall parcels.
Priority: ARCHIVE ACCESS
Loop status: FROZEN — PUBLIC/CATALOGUE RESEARCH COMPLETE; REOPEN ONLY WITH ORIGINAL EXCHANGE INSTRUMENTS/PLANS
Source / project evidence: NRO HARE 6374/6375; HARE 6956/1-5.

Batchelors / Further Homestall — Village Hall fragment Open

Wanted evidence: Full 7 Jun 1930 trust/governance deed + NRO PD 356/129 + HMLR title/register.

Source: Charity 304061; NRO PD 356/129; Shouldham PC 18 Mar 2024.

Record / Parcel: Batchelors / Further Homestall — Village Hall fragment
Actual record status: 1930 TRUST METADATA RECOVERED; OPERATIVE DEED NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Charity Commission: Declaration of Trust dated 7 Jun 1930; HE places Village Hall on eastern end of historic Batchelors-area enclosure; 2024 PC minutes sought deed + LR record
What it conclusively proves: Identifies a precise 1930 legal-document event on a physically matched historic Colts fragment.
What it does NOT prove: Does not show whether the deed conveyed, gifted, leased or merely governed the land.
Remaining exact missing item: Full 7 Jun 1930 trust/governance deed + NRO PD 356/129 + HMLR title/register.
Priority: CRITICAL
Loop status: OPEN — REAL PARCEL-SPECIFIC TEST
Source / project evidence: Charity 304061; NRO PD 356/129; Shouldham PC 18 Mar 2024.

Current HMLR freehold/title coverage of Colts core parcels Open

Wanted evidence: Full Borough Council file for the 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall conservation-area lime-tree entry, retrieved by address/date: actual application reference, applicant, plan and any ownership-related declaration actually present; then HMLR register/title plan/index-map search against both 'Colts Hall, 21 The Green, Shouldham, PE33 0BY' and '21 Colts Hall, Eastgate Street, Shouldham'. The secondary administrative address control does not replace HMLR or the full Borough planning file. Exact Borough application reference/full file remains required before any applicant/ownership-certificate inference. Search/request the direct TREECA/tree-notification register by Colts Hall + 21 The Green + 20 Nov 2025 + exact lime-pollarding description; do not repeat ordinary Planning Committee delegated-list searches. Retrieve/click the underlying direct 'View application' target for the 20 Nov 2025 parish entry or query the Borough register directly by exact address/date/description.

Source: HM Land Registry INSPIRE/SIM/register/title-plan workflow; WCT-DIG-0467 corrected Pass 98; WCT-DIG-0468.

Record / Parcel: Current HMLR freehold/title coverage of Colts core parcels
Actual record status: NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Official INSPIRE/SIM/title-search methods identified. WCT-DIG-0467 correctly records the 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall, 21 The Green conservation-area lime-tree entry; WCT-DIG-0468 adds the Borough Council address form '21 Colts Hall' under Eastgate Street (IDox 1480). Pass 101 adds a secondary administrative cross-check: public property indexes independently list the exact postal property as Council Tax Band F and as a house with EPC rating G / potential E / score 15. Pass 102 exact phrase/address searching still did not expose the Borough reference for the separate 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall T1/T2 lime-pollarding entry. Pass 103 establishes the Borough record class/search-channel control: an official Shouldham example is 24/00135/TREECA, while current Planning Committee delegated reports expressly exclude Works to Trees in a Conservation Area from ordinary delegated lists. Pass 104 adds the exact 6 Nov 2025 Shouldham control 25/00257/TREECA (Orchard House, 3 Lynn Road) plus surrounding late-November Borough TREECA examples, confirming the numbering system is active in the correct period.
What it conclusively proves: The modern property is searchable through two official address formulations plus a dated Borough planning event. PASS 98 confirms that 2/TPO/00673 / Grey Poplar is King George Playing Field, not Colts Hall; the exact Colts Hall planning reference is still to be retrieved. The exact modern postal property is independently present in multiple administrative/property datasets. The 2025 Colts Hall entry is therefore properly targeted as a direct tree-notification/TREECA planning-register record rather than an ordinary delegated-planning-list item. The exact Colts Hall number is now tightly targeted to the correct 2025 TREECA data stream, but it remains omitted from the surfaced parish result.
What it does NOT prove: No current legal proprietor, HMLR title number, registration boundary or unregistered gap is proved. The planning index does not itself prove title or identify the proprietor. Council-tax/EPC records do not identify the legal proprietor or freehold boundary. Pass 103 does not recover or infer the exact 2025 TREECA number, applicant, owner or plan. Neighbouring TREECA numbers cannot safely be used to deduce the Colts Hall number.
Remaining exact missing item: Full Borough Council file for the 20 Nov 2025 Colts Hall conservation-area lime-tree entry, retrieved by address/date: actual application reference, applicant, plan and any ownership-related declaration actually present; then HMLR register/title plan/index-map search against both 'Colts Hall, 21 The Green, Shouldham, PE33 0BY' and '21 Colts Hall, Eastgate Street, Shouldham'. The secondary administrative address control does not replace HMLR or the full Borough planning file. Exact Borough application reference/full file remains required before any applicant/ownership-certificate inference. Search/request the direct TREECA/tree-notification register by Colts Hall + 21 The Green + 20 Nov 2025 + exact lime-pollarding description; do not repeat ordinary Planning Committee delegated-list searches. Retrieve/click the underlying direct 'View application' target for the 20 Nov 2025 parish entry or query the Borough register directly by exact address/date/description.
Priority: HIGHEST
Loop status: OPEN — REQUIRED TO END MODERN OWNERSHIP QUESTION
Source / project evidence: HM Land Registry INSPIRE/SIM/register/title-plan workflow; WCT-DIG-0467 corrected Pass 98; WCT-DIG-0468.

NHER 4283 / 2001 protection agreement Open

Wanted evidence: Protection agreement + plan + parties; cross-check HMLR.

Source: Norfolk Heritage Explorer / Historic England designation context.

Record / Parcel: NHER 4283 / 2001 protection agreement
Actual record status: EXISTENCE KNOWN; AGREEMENT/PARTIES NOT RECOVERED
Evidence recovered: Norfolk Heritage Explorer says surviving earthworks have been under protection agreement since 2001
What it conclusively proves: Shows protected surviving pasture within the historic Colts landscape.
What it does NOT prove: Does not identify proprietor, occupier, title number or agreement plan publicly.
Remaining exact missing item: Protection agreement + plan + parties; cross-check HMLR.
Priority: HIGH
Loop status: OPEN — MODERN OWNER LEAD
Source / project evidence: Norfolk Heritage Explorer / Historic England designation context.

Macons identity Open

Wanted evidence: Any deed, abstract, sale particulars, map or schedule explicitly defining Macons

Source: Conveyance Register 2026-08-30 — Gap Resolution rank 9

Record history (latest 12)
  1. Updated conveyance/descent history, research archive.
    4 Sep 2026, 03:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk
  2. Updated conveyance/descent history, research archive.
    4 Sep 2026, 03:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk
  3. Updated conveyance/descent history, research archive.
    4 Sep 2026, 03:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk
  4. Updated research gaps.
    4 Sep 2026, 03:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk
  5. Updated research archive.
    4 Sep 2026, 03:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk
  6. Updated research archive.
    3 Sep 2026, 19:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk
  7. Updated research archive.
    3 Sep 2026, 19:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk
  8. Updated research archive.
    3 Sep 2026, 19:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk
  9. Updated research archive.
    3 Sep 2026, 19:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk
  10. Updated research archive.
    3 Sep 2026, 19:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk
  11. Updated research archive.
    3 Sep 2026, 19:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk
  12. Updated research archive.
    3 Sep 2026, 19:40 UTC · William James Dalrymple Bedding Fanshawe West Esq., Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk

Corrections / Challenges

Sign in to challenge or submit evidence against a recorded assertion.

JSON API

Machine-readable published manor data, including public images, mapped land areas, notes, rights, conveyances, relationships, records, source/document-library entries and public file links.

https://manorialregistry.com/index.php?rest_route=/mhr/v1/manor/watlington-west

Public API access is currently disabled. Authorised API clients must use a private X-MHR-API-Key; currently only administrator keys are enabled.

Private source files, pending edits, moderation/admin information, user API keys and non-public import identifiers are not returned.