Search Menu

Dunham-on-the-Hill

Sponsored by William James Dalrymple West, Esq,. Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk

← Back to Manorial Registry

Manor & Lordship

Manor / site
Unknown
Associated lordship
Lordship of Dunham-on-the-Hill Associated
Lordship status
Unknown

The supplied record expressly describes the property as a paramount lordship held in chief of the Crown; survival or extinction of a distinct title is not established.

Historical names: Dunham

About the Manor

(a paramount lordship held in-chief of the Crown)

THE SITUATION of this Lordship accords precisely with its Saxon name, dun a hill, and ham a dwelling place. The FitzAlans, afterwards Earls of Arundel, who were connected by marriage with the Earls of Chester, were the first grantees of this Manor. As a result Dunham became the head of an extensive seigniory comprising the Manors of Alvanley, Helsby, Mickle Trafford, Wimbolds Trafford, Hoole, and Hapsford.

In the reign of Edward II, Edmund FitzAlan, Earl of Arundel forfeited his estates and was beheaded at Hereford. However, his son Richard, was subsequently restored to his father's estates by Edward III, but his son and namesake was beheaded for treason in 1397. Thomas, the 11th Earl of Arundel died without issue in 1415 and his estates, but not his title, passed to his sisters and coheirs. Elizabeth married four times: William Montacute, Earl of Salisbury (1378); Thomas Lord Mowbray, Earl of Nottingham and Duke of Norfolk: best remembers in the opening scene of Shakespeare's Richard II when he challenges Henry, Earl of Hereford and Derby (later Henry IV) to a duel (1389); Sir Robert Gonshill (1401); Sir Gerrard Ufflete (1416). The second sister, Joan, married William Beauchamp, Baron Abergavenny; and the third, Margaret, was the wife of Sir Rowland Lenthall. Under these sisters, William Troutbeck held a lease of part of the Lordship in the reign of Henry V.

In Lord Shrewsbury's archives is a letter from Elizabeth, the eldest sister, confirming Mr Troutbeck holding:

“The Duchesse of Norff; Right dere well belovet, we grete you well, and for alsmycull (forasmuch) as we have given under our greate seale of our armes, unto our servant Norman Baynton, and Margaret his wife, and unto the heirs of Norman, the third part of the manors of Staune Dunham ... with the app’tenuz (appurtenances), of which, William Troutbeck hold of us the thrid part t’me (for the term) of his life yealding to us yerely a certayne rent, as the said William Troutbeck and declare you more pleyneley, we pray you with all oure hart, that ye make fine to be reud before you of thri part of the s’d manoirs, and also of the thrid part of the ferme (farm ie lease) of which the s’d Troutbeck yealds to us and to our sisters, unto the said Norman and Margaret and to the heirs of Norman, and with warrantie written under our great seale at Annesley XX May”.

Over a period of time all of the coheirs sold their moities to William Troutbeck who by 1444 became vested with the whole of the Manor. William's son, Sir William, claimed many rights in a writ of quo warranto in 1466: that part of the Forest of Delamere which lay within the Paramountcy with free warren of rabbits and power to fell and sell the trees, together with free pannage, the right to paster his and his tenants' pigs. Effectively, he became the sole forester for that part of Delamere that lay within his Manorial jurisdiction. The area contained in this “liberty” is specified in the charter: extending “from Stamford Bridge along the King's highway to Northwich, and from Northwich to Darleigh Brook, following the course of Darleigh Brook to the bounds between Rushden and Otton to Yanelegh Mill, and following thence the bounds between Ayton and Alpram to the town of Torpley, and from thence the bounds of the forest to Stamford Bridge”.

Sir William had within this bailiwick criminal jurisdiction and the right to take two bucks in summer and two does in winter with the right to keep greyhounds and hunting dogs for hares, rabbits, and foxes. He had the view of frankpledge in the Manor at Easter and Michaelmas, and a Court Baron every three weeks. He also asserted the right of free fishery in the River Dee, and the office of keeper of Bridge Gate at Chester. The Troutbecks held the Manor for several more generations until it passed to the Earls of Shrewsbury by the marriage of Margaret Troutbeck to Sir John Talbot of Grafton.

Rights, customs and incidents

“The Duchesse of Norff; Right dere well belovet, we grete you well, and for alsmycull (forasmuch) as we have given under our greate seale of our armes, unto our servant Norman Baynton, and Margaret his wife, and unto the heirs of Norman, the third part of the manors of Staune Dunham ... with the app’tenuz (appurtenances), of which, William Troutbeck hold of us the thrid part t’me (for the term) of his life yealding to us yerely a certayne rent, as the said William Troutbeck and declare you more pleyneley, we pray you with all oure hart, that ye make fine to be reud before you of thri part of the s’d manoirs, and also of the thrid part of the ferme (farm ie lease) of which the s’d Troutbeck yealds to us and to our sisters, unto the said Norman and Margaret and to the heirs of Norman, and with warrantie written under our great seale at Annesley XX May”.
William's son, Sir William, claimed many rights in a writ of quo warranto in 1466: that part of the Forest of Delamere which lay within the Paramountcy with free warren of rabbits and power to fell and sell the trees, together with free pannage, the right to paster his and his tenants' pigs.
Sir William had within this bailiwick criminal jurisdiction and the right to take two bucks in summer and two does in winter with the right to keep greyhounds and hunting dogs for hares, rabbits, and foxes.
He had the view of frankpledge in the Manor at Easter and Michaelmas, and a Court Baron every three weeks.
He also asserted the right of free fishery in the River Dee, and the office of keeper of Bridge Gate at Chester.

Ownership / Holder Account

Historical holder / succession information

  1. Earls of Shrewsbury by the marriage of Margaret Troutbeck to Sir John Talbot of Grafton [source claim requiring identity review]
    passed_to · historical_holder_or_transferee
    Source wording: The Troutbecks held the Manor for several more generations until it passed to the Earls of Shrewsbury by the marriage of Margaret Troutbeck to Sir John Talbot of Grafton.
  2. Troutbecks
    held_manor · historical_holder_or_transferee
    Source wording: The Troutbecks held the Manor for several more generations until it passed to the Earls of Shrewsbury by the marriage of Margaret Troutbeck to Sir John Talbot of Grafton.

Manorial Rights & Privileges

Historic manorial rights / privileges (9)

Free warren within the relevant manorial jurisdiction

Provisional

Sir William Troutbeck claimed free warren in a 1466 quo warranto.

Power to fell and sell timber within the part of Delamere Forest lying within the paramountcy

Provisional

Claimed by Sir William Troutbeck in 1466.

Free pannage

Provisional

The right to pasture the lord's and tenants' pigs was claimed in 1466.

Criminal jurisdiction within the bailiwick

Provisional

Asserted by Sir William Troutbeck in connection with the manorial jurisdiction.

Hunting rights, including specified rights to take bucks and does and keep hunting dogs

Provisional

The supplied account records rights to take two bucks in summer and two does in winter, and to keep greyhounds and hunting dogs for hares, rabbits and foxes.

View of frankpledge

Provisional

Held at Easter and Michaelmas according to the supplied account.

Court Baron every three weeks

Provisional

The supplied account records a triennial-cycle manorial court held every three weeks.

Free fishery in the River Dee

Provisional

Asserted by Sir William Troutbeck.

Office of keeper of Bridge Gate at Chester

Provisional

The supplied account records this office as an asserted incident of the lordship.

Conveyance & Descent

Export complete recorded holder history: Export PDF (coloured, with crests) Export TXT (full text and paths)

First holder to present holder: blood proximity & distance travelled

First recorded holder: Troutbecks

Present holder:

Recorded title journey: 7 holder entries in this manor's saved Conveyance & Descent history.

No recorded holder currently has a usable saved direct-blood or collateral-blood relationship path from which to calculate proximity percentages.

First recorded holder → present holder

A usable saved blood relationship path between the first recorded holder and the present holder has not yet been recorded, so that first-to-present genealogical distance cannot be calculated.

Troutbecks

Transfer: held_manor

Source role: historical_holder_or_transferee. The Troutbecks held the Manor for several more generations until it passed to the Earls of Shrewsbury by the marriage of Margaret Troutbeck to Sir John Talbot of Grafton.

Source: Lot #28 Manorial Auctioneers’ Partnership – October 1990

1326 – 1326

Edmund FitzAlan, 9th/10th Earl of Arundel

with Edmund FitzAlan, 9th/10th Earl of Arundel

Transfer: Forfeiture of estates following his rebellion; Edmund FitzAlan was executed at Hereford.

Previous holder: FitzAlan family

The lordship is described as having been held by the FitzAlans, and Edmund FitzAlan forfeited his estates in the reign of Edward II before his execution in 1326.

1331

Richard FitzAlan, 10th/11th Earl of Arundel

with Richard FitzAlan, 10th/11th Earl of Arundel

Transfer: Restoration of his father's estates by Edward III.

Previous holder: Edmund FitzAlan, Earl of Arundel

Richard FitzAlan was subsequently restored by Edward III to the estates forfeited by his father, including the Dunham lordship as described in the registry record.

– 1397

Richard FitzAlan, 11th/12th Earl of Arundel

with Richard FitzAlan, 11th/12th Earl of Arundel

Transfer: Forfeiture after execution for treason.

Previous holder: Richard FitzAlan, Earl of Arundel

The restored FitzAlan estates were again forfeited after Richard FitzAlan was executed for treason in 1397.

1415

Elizabeth FitzAlan, Duchess of Norfolk, and her sisters Joan FitzAlan and Margaret FitzAlan

with Elizabeth FitzAlan, Duchess of Norfolk, Joan FitzAlan, Margaret FitzAlan

Transfer: Descent as coheirs after Thomas FitzAlan died without issue; the estates, unlike the title, passed to his sisters.

Holding arrangement: Share — coheirs' shares or moieties; exact proportions not stated

Previous holder: Thomas FitzAlan, Earl of Arundel

On Thomas FitzAlan's death without issue in 1415, the estates passed to his three sisters and coheirs. The registry identifies them as Elizabeth, Joan and Margaret.

Transfer: Lease and subsequent acquisition of the coheirs' interests; by 1444 he was vested with the whole manor.

Previous holder: Elizabeth FitzAlan, Duchess of Norfolk, and her sisters Joan FitzAlan and Margaret FitzAlan

William Troutbeck held a lease of part of the lordship during the reign of Henry V. The record further states that, over time, the coheirs sold their moieties to him and that by 1444 he held the whole manor.

Transfer: Succession within the Troutbeck family and assertion of manorial and forest liberties by quo warranto.

Previous holder: William Troutbeck, Manorial holder of Dunham, lessee and later owner, Knight, lord of Dunham, claimant of forest and manorial liberties, Guardian of Marjery Holes

William Troutbeck's son, Sir William Troutbeck, asserted extensive manorial, forest, fishery and jurisdictional rights in a writ of quo warranto in 1466.

Lordship / Title Associations

Associations are recorded by period so changes in estate composition do not imply that every manor remained attached to the same title indefinitely.

Research Status / Wanted Evidence

Verify whether Dunham-on-the-Hill has a securely attested Domesday entry and its Domesday spelling. Open

Wanted evidence: Source-backed evidence resolving this point

Offline backfill could not securely resolve this without source research.

Verify the precise historical parish designation and any additional medieval name forms. Open

Wanted evidence: Source-backed evidence resolving this point

Offline backfill could not securely resolve this without source research.

Verify whether the paramount lordship constituted a distinct surviving title and determine its status and holder. Open

Wanted evidence: Source-backed evidence resolving this point

Offline backfill could not securely resolve this without source research.

Corrections / Challenges

Sign in to challenge or submit evidence against a recorded assertion.

JSON API

Machine-readable published manor data, including public images, mapped land areas, notes, rights, conveyances, relationships, records, source/document-library entries and public file links.

https://manorialregistry.com/index.php?rest_route=/mhr/v1/manor/dunham-on-the-hill

Public API access is currently disabled. Authorised API clients must use a private X-MHR-API-Key; currently only administrator keys are enabled.

Private source files, pending edits, moderation/admin information, user API keys and non-public import identifiers are not returned.