Search Menu

Brickendonbury

Sponsored by William James Dalrymple West, Esq,. Lord of Watlington-West, Norfolk

← Back to Manorial Registry

Manor & Lordship

Manor / site
Unknown
Associated lordship
Lordship of the Manor of Brickendonbury Associated
Lordship status
Unknown

The supplied record states that the lordship was conveyed separately from the estate in 1881; its subsequent status and holder are not positively established.

Historical names: Brickendona; Liberty of Brickendon

Location: Hertfordshire

Places / associated places: Hertfordshire

Listed in Domesday Book: Yes

About the Manor

In the Liberty of Brickendon and Hundred of Hertford

This Manor according to the Victoria History of Hertfordshire (Vol. III) was in the Hundred of Hertford in the parish of All Saints and was known as the Liberty of Brickendon. it was anciently part of the possessions of the Saxon Kings and was bestowed by Edward the Confessor upon the canons of the church of Waltham. The Canons of Waltham were 14th in the list of holders of land in the County of Hertford when the Domesday Survey was made and it was in that work called Brickendona. The detailed description of it is:

"It is assessed at 5 hides.

There is land for 8 ploughs.

In the demesne are 3 1/2 hides,

and on it are 2 ploughs, and there could be a third.

There 9 villeins have 4 ploughs between them and there could be a fifth.

There are 9 bordars and 24 cottars and 2 serf, and 1 mill worth 8 shillings.

Meadow is sufficient for 2 ploughteams,

pasture sufficient for the live stock of the vill and (worth) 2 shillings bedside,

woodland to feed 200 swine.

In all its value is and was 100 shillings at the time of King Edward 8 pounds.

This Manor belonged and belongs to the Church of Holy Cross of Waltham. "

Between the years 1174 and 1184 King Henry II confirmed the Manor to the monks of Waltham Abbey who had replaced the Canons of Waltham. It was given to them free from geld and toll and from the forfeiture of criminals, thus establishing the Liberty.

In 1227 the Abbot of Waltham obtained freedom from tollage and as there was no church then at Brickendon the Manor was regarded as belonging to the Parish of All Saints, Hertford. The monks held this Liberty until the Dissolution when King Henry VIII granted it to Thomas Knighton with the advowson of All Saints; from him it passed to Sir William Soame who conveyed it to Edward Clarke in 1682. His son Thomas surrendered to the Manor and when he died in 1754 it is said that he left it to Mrs. Jane Morgan, his niece. Her youngest son John Morgan inherited it and left a half share to his sister Jane and the other to the representatives of his Aunt, Anne Freke.

Jane's moiety passed to her son Sir Charles Morgan and from him to his grandchild Selina Rose Catherine, who was the wife of the Rev. W. T. Marsh-Luschington Tilson. The other moiety went to Anne Freke's two granddaughters, Mary, wife of the Rev. Edward Lewis, and Fanny, the wife of the Rev. Francis Lewis. In 1881 Henry Edward Paine and Richard Brettell, of Chertsey, purchased the Lordship of the Manor for £2,000. The parties to the Conveyance were: (1) Charles Edward Lewis of St. Pierre, Mon.; (2) Frances Lewis of Portskewitt, Mon. Spinster; (3) Thomas Freke Lewis of Abbey Dore, Hereford; (4) Thomas Henry organ of Chepstow, Mon. as surviving Settlement Trustee; (5) the said T. H. Morgan as mortgagee; (6) Selina Rose Catherine Marsh-Lushington Tilson of South Hall, Guildford; (7) Edward Motman, a Lt.-Col. in H.M. Army and Governor of H.M. Prison at Holloway; (8) Henry Edward Paine and Richard Brettell of Chertsey.

Up to this point the Lordship of the Manor had gone automatically with the Brickendon Estate, but like many other large estates during the second half of the last century, the time came when they came under the hammer and the Lordship of the Manor, sold as a separate Lot, passed to a person other than the owner of the Manor House and estate. in this particular case the purchaser of the Lordship of the Manor is unlikely to be the present owner of the Mansion, for this now belongs to the County and is the Headquarters of the County Executive Agricultural Committee. It is pleasant to relate that the buildings and grounds are kept in such perfect order that any former owner of the estate would feel that the house, stabling, parkland, woodlands and views he so loved were still appreciated and giving pleasure to employees and visitors.

An interesting feature in connection with the sale of the estate in 1881 is that considerable portions of the extensive wastes of the Manor were sold with the appropriate Lots. Even Brickendon Green, that charming open space at the Southern extremity of the Liberty, was sold as part of Fanshaw's Farm; Well Green and a number of wide roadside wastes were also sold with the Farms which they bordered. Altogether 35 acres of wastes were sold away from the Manor of which they had hitherto formed part. They cannot be enclosed, but the adjoining owners have the right to cut the grass, and fell the trees subject to any necessary license. These wastes, which were excepted from the 1881 conveyance of the Manor, are specifically shown on the plan attached to the old Particulars of Sale included in the records to be handed to the purchaser.

The plan referred to shows at the point where Brickendon Lane joins the road from Hertford to Hatfield, opposite the Horns Public House, a triangular piece of land upon which a small rectangular building is shown marked "Pound." No trace now remains of the building, but it was presumably the Pound into which the Pindar of the Manor drove stray cattle, sheep, etc., only to be recovered by the owners upon payment of the customary charges. Such interest as the present Lord of the Manor may have in this, and any wastes still forming part of the Manor, is included in the sale, and the purchaser should be able to negotiate wayleave agreements with the appropriate Authorities in respect of any telegraph, telephone, electricity poles, stays, kiosks, etc., erected thereon.

Many items of interest are to be found upon perusal of the records included in the sale. For example, some names well-known in the County are to be found among the Stewards, viz., Bostock Toller (Court held 1703); Henry Thorowgood (1755); Benjamin Rooke (1770); William Crowdy (1823, Rooke's stewardship thus being at least 53 years); Philip Longmore (1838); Matthew Skinner Longmore (1875); Thomas Joseph Sworder (1881); the last three being partners in the still existing Longmores at Hertford. Upon the sale to H. E. Paine and R. Brettell, Joseph Beaumont became Steward and has been followed by his son and grandson up to the present time.

The custom of descent in the Manor was to the eldest son; the fines were arbitrary, i.e. two years' annual value, as opposed to a fine certain of so much per acre, house, etc.

From an early date the Courts were held at the "Inn called the Black Swan otherwise Pimblico" in Hertford. This Inn was a copyhold property of the Manor and, at a Court held in 1706, is recorded as being surrendered by the tenant, Maria Hawkings, to her son-in-law Thomas Harrod and her daughter Maria, on their marriage (Vol. 1, p. 49).

The Cowper family had a long connection with the Manor. William Cowper (later referred to as "Clerk to the Parliaments") succeeded to holdings on the death of his father Spencer Cowper, a Justice of the Court of Common Pleas at Westminster, and subsequent reference to the Earldom conferred later on William Cowper occur frequently in the transactions.

The records of the mid-eighteenth century are unusually clear and full. The proceedings at a Court Leet held in 1758 (Vol. II, o. 141) are confirmation of the status of those Courts for reference is made to "the Great Inquest for our Lord the King." At these Courts the Jury - in Courts Baron and Customary Courts the jurors are called "The Homage" - took notice of the infringement on the ancient rights, not only of the Lord but also of the tenants, commoners, or inhabitants, such as the stopping-up of a water course for commoners' cattle, closure of a footpath, etc. A presentment was made to the Court referred to "that there is an Ancient Footpath leading from the West Street in the said Manor to the River Lee lying between the house of Stephen Beadle on the West part and the house of John Giddings on the East part and that no horses ought of right to pass or go in the said Footpath and that several persons have lately went up and down the said footpath with horses to the great prejudice and danger of all persons passing and repassing on foot up and down the said Footpath."

A court held in 1801 runs to 117 pages in recording redemptions of Land Tax by the heirs fo the Dowager Lady Tonwnshend; this family had a long connection with the Manor. Baron Dimsdale (the Barony was of Russian origin) also held extensive properties in this and other Hertfordshire Manors.

In Vol. VIII, p. 238-268 are enrolled a conveyance to the Governors and Company of the New River of several parcels of riverside land with accompanying plans. An intriguing loose note in this volume (at p. 161) is worded, "This book should be carefully examined with the Court Rolls and deeds of ? (illegible ) ? to 1874, Mr. ? does not appear to have enfranchised all but see deed." The note is signed "P. Longmore, The Castle."

The Conveyance of the Manor in 1881 enumerates in detail the rights intended to be included (inter alia) "wastes, warrens, commons, mines, minerals, quarries, furzes, trees, woods, underwoods, coppices and the ground and soil thereof, fences, hedges, ditches, ways, waters, water courses, fishings, fisheries, fowlings, Courts Leet, Courts baron and other Courts, views of frank-pledge, mills, mulctures, tolls, duties, reliefs, heriots, waifs, estrays, rents, services, royalties, jurisdictions, franchises, liberties, privileges, easements, profits, advantages, enrolments, hereditaments" and so on.

Among the papers to be handed over is a statement of fines on admission of tenants received by the Lord during the years 1871-76, the last decade of the ownership of the Manor by the Morgan family. These included 90 from H. Randall in 1871; 405 Pembertons Trustees (1872); 118 Misses Stodart; 79 10s. 0d. B. Young (1874) and 250 Baroness Dimsdale's Trustees (1876). These transactions emphasise the fact that Manorial Rights were in those days of substantial value, and that a good deal still remained is shown by the amount of the amount of the purchase money for what remained in 1881, viz., 2,000. Of that, 1,500 went to Charles E. Lewis, Thos. Freka Lewis, Frances Lewis, and Mrs. S. R. C. M. Lushington-Tilson , while the remaining 500 was paid to Everard Stephen Milward. Their receipt for the money duly signed and witnessed are endorsed on the conveyance.

Rights, customs and incidents

They cannot be enclosed, but the adjoining owners have the right to cut the grass, and fell the trees subject to any necessary license.
II, o. 141) are confirmation of the status of those Courts for reference is made to "the Great Inquest for our Lord the King." At these Courts the Jury - in Courts Baron and Customary Courts the jurors are called "The Homage" - took notice of the infringement on the ancient rights, not only of the Lord but also of the tenants, commoners, or inhabitants, such as the stopping-up of a water course for commoners' cattle, closure of a footpath, etc.
A presentment was made to the Court referred to "that there is an Ancient Footpath leading from the West Street in the said Manor to the River Lee lying between the house of Stephen Beadle on the West part and the house of John Giddings on the East part and that no horses ought of right to pass or go in the said Footpath and that several persons have lately went up and down the said footpath with horses to the great prejudice and danger of all persons passing and repassing on foot up and down the said Footpath."
The Conveyance of the Manor in 1881 enumerates in detail the rights intended to be included (inter alia) "wastes, warrens, commons, mines, minerals, quarries, furzes, trees, woods, underwoods, coppices and the ground and soil thereof, fences, hedges, ditches, ways, waters, water courses, fishings, fisheries, fowlings, Courts Leet, Courts baron and other Courts, views of frank-pledge, mills, mulctures, tolls, duties, reliefs, heriots, waifs, estrays, rents, services, royalties, jurisdictions, franchises, liberties, privileges, easements, profits, advantages, enrolments, hereditaments" and so on.
These transactions emphasise the fact that Manorial Rights were in those days of substantial value, and that a good deal still remained is shown by the amount of the amount of the purchase money for what remained in 1881, viz., 2,000.

Associated manorial documents / archive references

  • Court Books: 1703-1731; 1733-1762; 1767-1799; 1801-1820; 1823-1845; 1845-1865; 1865-1932.
  • Rental: 1848
  • Particulars of Sale: 15th August 1882
  • Particulars of Tenants: properties etc., dates of admissions, enfranchisements, etc.
  • Insurance of records 300, premium 15/- p.a.
  • Commencement of Title: Deed dated 14th December, 1881

Ownership / Holder Account

Historical holder / succession information

  1. In 1881 Henry Edward Paine and Richard Brettell, of Chertsey [source claim requiring identity review]
    1881 · purchased · historical_holder_or_transferee
    Source wording: In 1881 Henry Edward Paine and Richard Brettell, of Chertsey, purchased the Lordship of the Manor for £2,000.
  2. a person other than the owner of the Manor House and estate [source claim requiring identity review]
    passed_to · historical_holder_or_transferee
    Source wording: Up to this point the Lordship of the Manor had gone automatically with the Brickendon Estate, but like many other large estates during the second half of the last century, the time came when they came under the hammer and the Lordship of the Manor, sold as a separate Lot, passed to a person other than the owner of the Manor House and estate. in this particular case the purchaser of the Lordship of the Manor is unlikely to be the present owner of the Mansion, for this now belongs to the County and is the Headquarters of the County Executive Agricultural Committee.

Manorial Rights & Privileges

Historic manorial rights / privileges (7)

Courts Leet, Courts Baron and customary courts

Provisional

The manor maintained courts, including a Court Leet and Courts Baron, with jurors or homage presenting breaches of manorial and public rights.

View of frankpledge and related jurisdictions

Provisional

These were expressly included among the rights listed in the 1881 conveyance of the lordship.

Wastes, commons, warrens, and associated soil and profits

Provisional

The 1881 conveyance enumerated wastes, warrens, commons, mines, minerals, quarries, furze, trees, woods, and related profits; substantial areas of waste were sold with adjoining lots and excepted from the manor conveyance.

Rights concerning ways, waters, watercourses, fishings and fisheries

Provisional

These rights were expressly included in the 1881 conveyance; court presentments also protected an ancient footpath and a watercourse used by commoners' cattle.

Herbage and tree-cutting rights on certain wastes

Provisional

Adjoining owners were stated to have rights to cut grass and fell trees on wastes that could not be enclosed, subject to any necessary licence.

Custom of descent to the eldest son

Provisional

The stated manor custom was descent to the eldest son; fines on admission were arbitrary and calculated at two years' annual value.

Mill, mulctures, tolls, rents, services, heriots, waifs and estrays

Provisional

These incidents and profits were among the rights enumerated in the 1881 conveyance.

Conveyance & Descent

First holder to present holder: blood proximity & distance travelled

First recorded holder: Henry Edward Paine and Richard Brettell

Present holder:

Recorded title journey: 10 holder entries in this manor's saved Conveyance & Descent history.

No recorded holder currently has a usable saved direct-blood or collateral-blood relationship path from which to calculate proximity percentages.

First recorded holder → present holder

A usable saved blood relationship path between the first recorded holder and the present holder has not yet been recorded, so that first-to-present genealogical distance cannot be calculated.

1881

Henry Edward Paine and Richard Brettell

with Henry Edward Paine, Richard Brettell

Transfer: Purchased the lordship of the manor for £2,000

Holding arrangement: Joint

Previous holder: The Morgan and Lewis interests and associated parties

The 1881 conveyance treated the lordship as a separate interest from the manor house and estate. The supplied account also states that Everard Stephen Milward received £500 of the purchase money, while £1,500 went to named Lewis and Morgan-related parties.

Source: Offline model knowledge; source verification required

1174 – 1184

Monks of Waltham Abbey

with Monks of Waltham Abbey

Transfer: King Henry II confirmed the manor to the monks of Waltham Abbey, with liberties including freedom from geld and toll and from forfeiture of criminals.

Previous holder: The canons of the church of Waltham

The confirmation established or confirmed the Liberty of Brickendon under the Waltham religious house.

1530 – 1547

Thomas Knighton

with Thomas Knighton

Transfer: King Henry VIII granted the manor, with the advowson of All Saints, to Thomas Knighton at or after the Dissolution.

Previous holder: Waltham Abbey

The registry places this grant in the period of the Dissolution but does not provide an exact date.

1682

Edward Clarke

with Edward Clarke

Transfer: Sir William Soame conveyed Brickendonbury to Edward Clarke.

Previous holder: Sir William Soame

– 1754

Thomas Clarke

with Thomas Clarke

Transfer: Thomas Clarke, son of Edward Clarke, surrendered to the manor and held the Brickendonbury interest until his death in 1754.

Previous holder: Edward Clarke

The registry describes the event as a surrender to the manor and states that Thomas Clarke died in 1754; the exact date and legal effect are not otherwise specified.

1754

Jane Morgan

with Jane Morgan

Transfer: Thomas Clarke is said to have left the manor interest to his niece, Mrs Jane Morgan.

Previous holder: Thomas Clarke

The registry uses qualified wording ('it is said'), so the succession is recorded conservatively.

John Morgan

with John Morgan, Jane Morgan, Representatives of Anne Freke

Transfer: John Morgan, Jane Morgan's youngest son, inherited the manor interest and divided it by leaving a half share to his sister Jane and the other half to the representatives of his aunt Anne Freke.

Holding arrangement: Share — Divided into two half shares

Previous holder: Jane Morgan

This row records the descent and division described in the registry; dates are not supplied.

Sir Charles Morgan

with Sir Charles Morgan

Transfer: Jane Morgan's moiety passed to her son Sir Charles Morgan.

Holding arrangement: Share — One moiety

Previous holder: Jane Morgan

– 1881

Selina Rose Catherine Marsh-Luschington Tilson

with Selina Rose Catherine Marsh-Luschington Tilson

Transfer: The moiety held through Sir Charles Morgan passed to his grandchild Selina Rose Catherine, wife of the Rev. W. T. Marsh-Luschington Tilson, and was included among the interests conveyed in 1881.

Holding arrangement: Share — One moiety

Previous holder: Sir Charles Morgan

This is the Morgan-side moiety identified in the registry's account of the 1881 conveyance.

– 1881

Mary Lewis and Fanny Lewis

with Mary Lewis, Fanny Lewis

Transfer: The other moiety descended to Anne Freke's two granddaughters, Mary, wife of the Rev. Edward Lewis, and Fanny, wife of the Rev. Francis Lewis, and was included among the interests conveyed in 1881.

Holding arrangement: Share — One moiety jointly represented by two granddaughter branches

Previous holder: Representatives of Anne Freke

The registry does not state whether the two women held as joint owners or in separate fractional shares within the moiety.

Lordship / Title Associations

Associations are recorded by period so changes in estate composition do not imply that every manor remained attached to the same title indefinitely.

Research Status / Wanted Evidence

The post-1881 holder and survival status of the separate lordship title are not established. Open

Wanted evidence: Source-backed evidence resolving this point

Offline backfill could not securely resolve this without source research.

The precise dates and instruments for the successions between the Dissolution and 1881 remain incomplete. Open

Wanted evidence: Source-backed evidence resolving this point

Offline backfill could not securely resolve this without source research.

The identity of the purchaser of the lordship at the later separate sale is not established in the supplied record. Open

Wanted evidence: Source-backed evidence resolving this point

Offline backfill could not securely resolve this without source research.

Corrections / Challenges

Sign in to challenge or submit evidence against a recorded assertion.

JSON API

Machine-readable published manor data, including public images, mapped land areas, notes, rights, conveyances, relationships, records, source/document-library entries and public file links.

https://manorialregistry.com/index.php?rest_route=/mhr/v1/manor/brickendonbury

Public API access is currently disabled. Authorised API clients must use a private X-MHR-API-Key; currently only administrator keys are enabled.

Private source files, pending edits, moderation/admin information, user API keys and non-public import identifiers are not returned.