Historical names: Aldebury; Albury
Location: Merstham, Surrey
Places / associated places: Merstham, Surrey
Location & Extent
GPS Location & Recorded Land Areas
Representative GPS point: 51.259, -0.1473
Identity: confirmed — The registry record is securely identified with the reputed manor of Albury, also styled Aldebury, in Merstham, Surrey. The Victoria County History records its tenure of the Prior of Christchurch, Canterbury, by Sir Edmund de Passelew and John de Passelew, its later descent through the Timperley, Elingbridge, Dannett, Southcote, Docminique and Jolliffe families, and its eventual union with Merstham Manor. Historic England independently identifies the medieval moated site at Albury Farm, Merstham, as the site of the Albury manor house.
Representative point: 51.2590, -0.1473
Basis: documented_manor_house — The manor-house site is identified with the medieval moated enclosure at Albury Farm, Merstham. Historic England gives National Grid Reference TQ 29376 52721; the representative coordinates are a rounded WGS84 conversion of that documented site location.
Point confidence: medium
Boundary status: representative_point_only
Boundary period:
Boundary confidence: none
Boundary basis: The consulted sources establish the manor-house location but do not provide a defensible perimeter for the historical manorial land. The Victoria County History mentions specific holdings and a licence to impark 40 acres of wood, 100 acres of land, 80 acres of pasture and 30 acres of meadow in Merstham, but does not identify their complete spatial arrangement or the manor's outer boundary. The scheduled-monument boundary at Albury Farm represents the archaeological moat and manor-house site, not the territorial extent of Albury Manor, and therefore has not been substituted as a manor polygon.
Sources:
- The National Archives, Albury Manor, TNA/MDR record F245688: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/c/F245688 — Registry record identifying Albury Manor as a reputed manor in Merstham, Surrey, and associating the manor-house site with the medieval moated enclosure at Albury Farm.
- A History of the County of Surrey, Volume 3, Victoria County History, page 290: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:The_Victoria_History_of_the_County_of_Surrey_Volume_3.djvu/290 — Documents the historical identity and descent of the reputed manor of Albury or Aldebury in Merstham, including the de Passelew, Timperley, Elingbridge, Dannett, Southcote, Docminique and Jolliffe connections, and states that the old manor-house site is marked by a moated enclosure.
- Historic England, Medieval moated site, Albury Farm, Merstham, List Entry 1015977: https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1015977 — Identifies the medieval moated site at Albury Farm as the former manor-house site, links it to the de Passelle family, and gives National Grid Reference TQ 29376 52721.
- The National Archives, Albury Manor court roll with rentals, DD/HY/10/5: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/N14307364 — Archive reference for a 1512-1565 Albury Manor court roll with six rentals, supporting the existence of manorial records but not supplying an accessible complete boundary in the consulted catalogue entry.
- The National Archives, Albury Manor rental, DD/HY/11/1/2: https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/N14274217 — Archive reference for a 1633 Albury Manor rental, potentially relevant to reconstructing the estate's parcels, but the catalogue entry does not expose a mapped territorial extent.
Warnings / uncertainty:
- No reliable historical polygon for the full manorial extent was located in the consulted sources.
- The representative point denotes the documented medieval manor-house site at Albury Farm, not the centroid or complete boundary of the manor's lands.
- The Historic England scheduled-monument boundary has deliberately not been returned as the manor boundary.
About the Manor
Albury Manor, also recorded as Aldebury and Albury, was a reputed manor in Merstham parish, Surrey, held of the Prior of Christchurch, Canterbury. In the early fourteenth century it was held by Sir Edmund de Passelew and his son John. The manor-house site is identified with a medieval moated enclosure at Albury Farm, Merstham. The estate was later associated with the Timperley, Elingbridge, Dannett, Southcote, Docminique and Jolliffe families. It was eventually united with the manor of Merstham. The place-name and local roads and institutions, including Albury Road and Albury Manor School, preserve the manor's association with South Merstham.
Ownership / Holder Account
The secure documentary descent begins in the early fourteenth century with Sir Edmund de Passelew and his son John, who held Albury of the Prior of Christchurch for an annual service of £16 and suit at the Merstham court. John inherited about 1327 and conveyed his right in 1339 to Richard de Burton, while John le French held the tenement under a lease beginning in 1338. The subsequent record indicates that Nicholas le French granted the manor for eight years to Fulk Harwode, who conveyed his right to Nicholas de Lovayne in 1365–1368. The next securely reported lord is John Timperley, whose tenure falls in the reign of Henry VI; the precise transition from Nicholas de Lovayne is not recorded in the consulted sources. Timperley conveyed the manor to John Elingbridge, who settled it on his second wife Anne. John Elingbridge died in 1473 and was succeeded by his grandson Thomas, who died in 1507. Thomas's daughter Anne became heiress after the death of her posthumous brother John in 1507 and later married her guardian, John Dannett. Albury remained with the Dannetts until 1579, when Leonard Dannett and Christiana his wife sold it to John Southcote. After Southcote's death in 1585 the manor was settled on his son John and John's wife Magdalen Waldegrave. Two-thirds of the estate were regranted by the Crown in 1633–1634 to John Southcote and his son Edward, described as recusants, for an annual rent of £100. The manor was settled on John Southcote's grandson John in December 1637, shortly before the elder John died in January 1637/8. It remained in the Southcote family until its sale to Paul Docminique in 1727. The manor later became the property of William Jolliffe, but the consulted source does not establish the exact date or instrument of that transfer. It was subsequently united with Merstham Manor, with Lord Hylton identified as owner in the Victoria County History's early twentieth-century account. Several intermediate transactions and the precise date of the union remain undocumented in the sources consulted.
Manorial Rights & Privileges
Historic manorial rights / privileges (3)
Held of the Prior of Christchurch, Canterbury
Provisional
The early fourteenth-century holding is expressly described as being held of the Prior of Christchurch, Canterbury.
Annual service of £16
Provisional
The early fourteenth-century tenure was subject to an annual service of £16.
Suit at the Merstham court
Provisional
The early fourteenth-century tenure included suit at the Merstham court.
Records & References
Sources and references mentioning this manor/title which are not necessarily conveyances or transfers.
7 records found · showing 1–7.
1839-1893: rentals, with other manors (1 bundle, including accounts and quit rents)
Held by: Somerset Heritage Centre (South West Heritage Trust)
Further information: NRA 3945 Jolliffe
1836-1902: steward's papers, with other manors (1 bundle)
Held by: Somerset Heritage Centre (South West Heritage Trust)
Further information: NRA 3945 Jolliffe
1773-1899: court book, with Merstham
Held by: Somerset Heritage Centre (South West Heritage Trust)
Further information: NRA 3945 Jolliffe
1762- 1657: rental, with Merstham (copy with other papers)
Held by: Somerset Heritage Centre (South West Heritage Trust)
Further information: NRA 3945 Jolliffe
1633: rental
Held by: Somerset Heritage Centre (South West Heritage Trust)
Further information: NRA 3945 Jolliffe
1559- 1711: court roll
Held by: Somerset Heritage Centre (South West Heritage Trust)
Further information: NRA 3945 Jolliffe
1512-1565: court roll (with six rentals)
Held by: Somerset Heritage Centre (South West Heritage Trust)
Further information: NRA 3945 Jolliffe
Conveyance & Descent
First holder to present holder: blood proximity & distance travelled
First recorded holder: Sir Edmund de Passelew and John de Passelew
Present holder:
Recorded title journey: 21 holder entries in this manor's saved Conveyance & Descent history.
No recorded holder currently has a usable saved direct-blood or collateral-blood relationship path from which to calculate proximity percentages.
First recorded holder → present holder
A usable saved blood relationship path between the first recorded holder and the present holder has not yet been recorded, so that first-to-present genealogical distance cannot be calculated.
Sir Edmund de Passelew and John de Passelew
Transfer: Documented holding of Albury of the Prior of Christchurch; John later inherited after Sir Edmund's death.
Holding arrangement: Joint — Joint holding by father and son; exact shares not stated.
Shared holding: de Passelew family
Co-holder: John de Passelew
Previous holder: Not established in the consulted sources
The reputed manor of Albury was held of the Prior of Christchurch by Sir Edmund de Passelew, or Passelee, together with his son John, for service of £16 yearly and suit of court every three weeks at Merstham. Sir Edmund also held other land in Merstham jointly with his second wife Margaret; that separate holding should not be confused with the manor itself.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, pp. 216–217; citing Chan. Inq. p.m. 1 Edw. III, no. 35, and related records. — source link
Transfer: Inheritance from his father, Sir Edmund de Passelew; John then conveyed his right in the manor in 1339.
Shared holding: de Passelew family
Co-holder: Sir Edmund de Passelew and John de Passelew
Previous holder: Sir Edmund de Passelew and John de Passelew
John de Passelew inherited Albury at his father's death about 1327. In 1339 he conveyed all his right in the manor to Richard de Burton. The conveyance also transferred to Richard an annual rent of 20 marks from John le French, who held the Albury tenement under a seven-year lease beginning in 1338.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Chan. Inq. p.m. 1 Edw. III, no. 35; Add. MS 6167, fols. 20 and 245; and Calendar of Close Rolls, 1339–1341, p. 338. — source link
Transfer: Conveyance by John de Passelew of all his right in Albury in 1339.
Shared holding: de Burton family
Previous holder: John de Passelew
Richard de Burton received John de Passelew's right in Albury in 1339. The same transaction transferred an annual rent of 20 marks from John le French, who occupied the Albury tenement under a lease. The consulted source does not establish how long Richard de Burton retained the manor or the precise transition to the later French family interest.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Add. MS 6167, fol. 245, and Calendar of Close Rolls, 1339–1341, p. 338. — source link
Transfer: Seven-year lease of the Albury tenement beginning in 1338; the lease or its rent was referred to in the 1339 conveyance to Richard de Burton.
Holding arrangement: Other — Leasehold tenancy, not established freehold lordship
Shared holding: French leaseholding interest
Previous holder: Richard de Burton or the prior manor interest represented by John de Passelew
John le French held the tenement of Albury on a seven-year lease beginning in 1338. He is included to preserve the documented leasehold interest, not as a proven absolute lord of the manor. The 1339 conveyance transferred an annual rent of 20 marks from him to Richard de Burton.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Add. MS 6167, fol. 245, and Calendar of Close Rolls, 1339–1341, p. 338. — source link
Nicholas le French
Transfer: Granted the manor for eight years at a rent of 50 shillings to Fulk Harwode.
Shared holding: French family
Previous holder: Richard de Burton or an undocumented intervening holder
The Victoria County History states that either the lease to John le French was renewed or the manor was acquired in fee by the French family. It records that Nicholas le French later granted the manor for eight years at a rent of 50 shillings to Fulk Harwode. Because the source expresses uncertainty about the legal route by which the French family acquired the manor, the date and nature of Nicholas's title are retained as uncertain.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Close Rolls, 39 Edward III, membranes 26 and 25. — source link
Transfer: Received an eight-year grant of the manor from Nicholas le French and conveyed his right to Nicholas de Lovayne in 1365–1368.
Holding arrangement: Other — Term interest under an eight-year grant; not necessarily absolute freehold ownership
Shared holding: Harwode interest
Previous holder: Nicholas le French
Fulk Harwode held the manor under an eight-year grant from Nicholas le French at a rent of 50 shillings. He conveyed his right to Nicholas de Lovayne in 1365–1368. The legal character of the interest is described as a term interest because the source expressly states that the grant was for eight years.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Close Rolls, 39 Edward III, membranes 26 and 25. — source link
Transfer: Received Fulk Harwode's right in Albury in a conveyance dated within 1365–1368.
Holding arrangement: Other — Right conveyed under the term arrangement; exact legal extent not stated
Shared holding: de Lovayne interest
Previous holder: Fulk Harwode
Nicholas de Lovayne received Fulk Harwode's right in Albury in 1365–1368. The subsequent descent is undocumented until John Timperley is reported as holding the manor in the reign of Henry VI.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Close Rolls, 39 Edward III, membranes 26 and 25. — source link
Transfer: The source reports that John Timperley held Albury and later conveyed it to John Elingbridge; the date of the conveyance is not stated.
Shared holding: Timperley family
Previous holder: Nicholas de Lovayne or an undocumented intervening holder
After an undocumented interval, Albury is reported as being held by John Timperley in the reign of Henry VI. He received royal privileges including a licence to impark land in Merstham, free warren and waif and stray. Manning and Bray, as cited by the Victoria County History, state that Timperley conveyed the manor to John Elingbridge. The precise date and instrument are not given in the consulted source.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Manning and Bray, History and Antiquities of Surrey, volume 2, p. 258, and Charter Rolls, 27–39 Henry VI, no. 41. — source link
Transfer: Conveyance from John Timperley; John Elingbridge settled the manor on his second wife Anne.
Shared holding: Elingbridge family
Co-holder: Thomas Elingbridge
Previous holder: John Timperley
John Elingbridge received Albury from John Timperley according to the Merstham court rolls cited by Manning and Bray. He settled the manor on his second wife Anne, daughter of John Prophet and widow of Ralph St. Leger. John Elingbridge died in 1473.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Manning and Bray, History and Antiquities of Surrey, volume 2, p. 258. — source link
Anne Elingbridge
Transfer: Settlement by her husband John Elingbridge on his second wife Anne.
Holding arrangement: Trust — Settlement interest; exact legal extent not stated
Shared holding: Elingbridge settlement
Previous holder: John Elingbridge
John Elingbridge settled Albury on his second wife Anne, daughter of John Prophet and widow of Ralph St. Leger. The consulted source does not specify whether Anne held for life, in jointure, or under another settlement form, so this is recorded as a settlement interest rather than as an unequivocal sole lordship.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Manning and Bray, History and Antiquities of Surrey, volume 2, p. 258. — source link
Transfer: Succession as grandson and heir of John Elingbridge after John died in 1473.
Shared holding: Elingbridge family
Co-holder: John Elingbridge
Previous holder: John Elingbridge
Thomas Elingbridge succeeded his grandfather John Elingbridge, who died in 1473. Thomas died in 1507, leaving one daughter, Anne, and a posthumous son, John, who was born and died in the same year.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Manning and Bray, History and Antiquities of Surrey, volume 2, p. 258, and related court-roll evidence. — source link
Transfer: Succeeded as heiress after the death of her father Thomas Elingbridge and her posthumous brother John; later married her guardian John Dannett, who became associated with the estate.
Shared holding: Elingbridge-Dannett family
Previous holder: Thomas Elingbridge
Anne became heiress of the estate after her father Thomas died in 1507 and her posthumous brother John died in the same year. She later married her guardian, John Dannett, knighted in 1529. The source states that Albury remained in the possession of the Dannetts until 1579; it does not specify whether Anne and John Dannett held jointly, or whether John held under her inheritance or by another legal arrangement.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Manning and Bray, History and Antiquities of Surrey, volume 2, p. 258, and related court-roll evidence. — source link
John Dannett, Knighted 1529
Transfer: Marriage and inheritance connection through Anne Elingbridge; the manor remained in the Dannett family until its sale in 1579.
Holding arrangement: Joint — Exact shares not stated
Shared holding: Dannett family
Co-holder: Leonard Dannett and Christiana Dannett
Previous holder: Anne Elingbridge
John Dannett acquired his association with Albury through his marriage to Anne Elingbridge, his ward and the estate's heiress. The consulted source records the manor as remaining in the Dannett family until 1579, when Leonard Dannett and Christiana his wife sold it to John Southcote. John Dannett was knighted in 1529 and later marshalled a muster from Merstham in 1539.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Manning and Bray, History and Antiquities of Surrey, volume 2, p. 258, and Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, Henry VIII, volume 14, part 1, no. 294. — source link
Transfer: Sold Albury Manor to John Southcote in 1579.
Holding arrangement: Joint — Joint vendors; exact shares not stated
Shared holding: Dannett family
Co-holder: John Dannett
Previous holder: Dannett family
The manor remained in the Dannett family until Leonard Dannett and Christiana his wife conveyed it to John Southcote in 1579. A local history account gives 1578, but the Victoria County History cites the 1579 recovery and feet of fine and is preferred here.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Recovery Rolls, Hilary 22 Elizabeth, rot. 534, and Feet of Fines, Surrey, Michaelmas 22 and 23 Elizabeth. — source link
Transfer: Purchase from Leonard Dannett and Christiana Dannett in 1579; after his death the manor was settled on his son John and daughter-in-law Magdalen.
Shared holding: Southcote family
Co-holder: John Southcote and Magdalen Southcote
Previous holder: Leonard Dannett and Christiana Dannett
John Southcote acquired Albury Manor from Leonard Dannett and Christiana Dannett in 1579. He was described by the Victoria County History as one of the judges of the Queen's Bench. He died in April 1585, after which the manor was settled upon his son John and John's wife Magdalen.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Recovery Rolls, Hilary 22 Elizabeth, rot. 534, Feet of Fines, Surrey, Michaelmas 22 and 23 Elizabeth, and Chancery Inquisitions post mortem, series 2, volume 206, no. 25. — source link
Transfer: Settlement following the death of John Southcote in April 1585; the manor was settled on his son John and John's wife Magdalen Waldegrave.
Holding arrangement: Joint — Joint settlement; exact shares not stated
Shared holding: Southcote family
Co-holder: John Southcote
Previous holder: John Southcote, Judge of the Queen's Bench
After the death of the purchaser John Southcote in April 1585, Albury was settled on his son John and John's wife Magdalen, one of the daughters of Sir Edward Waldegrave. The source later records a Crown regrant of two-thirds of the estate to John Southcote and his son Edward in 1633–1634, indicating that the estate's legal interests were affected by recusancy and Crown action.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Chancery Inquisitions post mortem, series 2, volume 206, no. 25. — source link
John Southcote and Edward Southcote
Transfer: Crown regrant of two-thirds of Albury and other estates to John Southcote and his son Edward, recusants, at an annual rent of £100.
Holding arrangement: Share — Two-thirds of the estate
Shared holding: Southcote family, Crown regrant
Previous holder: John Southcote and Magdalen Southcote
The Victoria County History states that two-thirds of Albury, with several other estates, were regranted by the Crown in 1633–1634 to John Southcote and his son Edward, who were recusants, at an annual rent of £100. This was a Crown regrant of a share of the estate and should not be treated as an ordinary private conveyance of the entire manor.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Patent Roll, 9 Charles I, part 16, no. 2. — source link
John Southcote, grandson of the earlier John Southcote
Transfer: Settlement on the grandson John Southcote in December 1637, shortly before the death of the elder John Southcote in January 1637/8.
Holding arrangement: Trust — Settlement interest; exact share not stated
Shared holding: Southcote family settlement
Previous holder: John Southcote and Edward Southcote
The manor was settled on John Southcote's grandson John in December 1637. The elder John Southcote died in January 1637/8. The source states that Albury remained the property of the Southcote family until its sale in 1727, but does not provide a complete list of the intervening holders.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Chancery Inquisition post mortem, series 2, volume 487, no. 181, and related Southcote evidence. — source link
Transfer: Purchased Albury Manor from the Southcote family in 1727.
Shared holding: Docminique family
Previous holder: Southcote family
The Victoria County History states that Albury remained the property of the Southcote family until 1727, when it was sold to Paul Docminique. The consulted sources do not establish the exact deed, consideration, or date on which Paul Docminique's ownership ended.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; citing Close Roll, 1 George II, part 1, no. 18, and Feet of Fines, Surrey, Michaelmas 1 George III, as related estate evidence. — source link
William Jolliffe
Transfer: Later acquisition from the Docminique interest; exact date and instrument not established. The manor was eventually united with Merstham Manor.
Shared holding: Jolliffe family
Previous holder: Paul Docminique
The Victoria County History states that Albury eventually became the property of William Jolliffe. It does not identify the precise conveyance or date of acquisition. William Jolliffe also purchased Merstham Manor in 1788, but the consulted evidence does not permit the date of his acquisition of Albury to be equated with the 1788 Merstham purchase.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; see also p. 214 for William Jolliffe's 1788 purchase of Merstham Manor. — source link
Lord Hylton, Jolliffe family
Transfer: Inherited or succeeded to the Jolliffe interest after Albury had become the property of William Jolliffe; the exact succession and date are not established. Albury was eventually united with Merstham Manor.
Shared holding: Jolliffe-Hylton family
Previous holder: William Jolliffe and later Jolliffe family holders
The Victoria County History states that Albury eventually became the property of William Jolliffe and was united to the manor of Merstham, with Lord Hylton as the present owner at the time of publication. This identifies Lord Hylton as the latest securely evidenced historical holder in the consulted sources, but the exact transfer from William Jolliffe and the precise date of the union are not stated. A late nineteenth-century Kelly's directory also identifies Lord Hylton with Merstham House and as lord of the manor in the locality, corroborating the Jolliffe-Hylton connection.
Source: A History of the County of Surrey, volume 3, Victoria County History, 1911, parish of Merstham, p. 216; corroborated by Kelly's Directory of Surrey, 1885, entry for Merstham. — source link
Corrections / Challenges
Sign in to challenge or submit evidence against a recorded assertion.
JSON API
Machine-readable published manor data, including public images, mapped land areas, notes, rights, conveyances, relationships, records, source/document-library entries and public file links.
https://manorialregistry.com/index.php?rest_route=/mhr/v1/manor/albury-manorPublic API access is currently disabled. Authorised API clients must use a private X-MHR-API-Key; currently only administrator keys are enabled.
Private source files, pending edits, moderation/admin information, user API keys and non-public import identifiers are not returned.